Evergreen Post Acute
8643 NE Beech Street, Portland, OR 97220 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 55 certified beds · (503) 256-2151 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $4,194 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.0% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.5% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.5% | 13.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.9% | 81.2% | 79.4% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.43 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered a discontinued medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure resulted in the resident experiencing diaphoresis (heavy sweating), shortness of breath and diminished lung sounds which required emergency medical services and treatment at the hospital. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2/2019 with diagnoses including acute bronchitis (a condition that causes swelling in the lungs). A 2/24/20 physician order indicated Resident 10 was prescribed Roxicodone (an opioid pain medication) every four hours to assist with pain management. A 4/18/22 physician order indicated Resident 10 was to begin receiving Xtampza (an opioid pain medication) once a day for pain management on 4/20/22 and for Roxicodone to be discontinued on 4/20/22. Review of a 4/2022 MAR revealed Resident 10 received both Xtampza and Roxicodone on 4/20/22, 4/21/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure mental health services were obtained for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for behavioral health services. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including major depression and suicidal ideation. Resident 1's [NAME] Psychiatric Consultant Notes dated 8/20/25 indicated she/he had last spoken to a therapist at that time. The notes indicated Resident 1 requested to discontinue services with the specific therapist. The notes indicated further therapy could be helpful for Resident 1 and the clinician recommended nursing staff and social services to assist Resident 1 with finding ongoing therapy outside the facility. There was no documented evidence in Resident 1's clinical record to indicate the facility followed up on obtaining mental health services for the resident after 8/2025. Resident 1's Care Plan dated 4/10/26 included active suicidal ideations, with interventions including to call 988, to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for falls. Findings include: Resident 9 admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including left femur fracture following a fall in previous living situation, dementia with psychotic disturbance, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and unsteadiness on feet. A MORSE (Morse Fall Scale) Fall assessment dated [DATE] and 8/16/25 indicated Resident 9 was a high fall risk.The Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan dated 8/18/25 revealed Resident 9's problem solving was severely impaired and the resident required maximum assistance with transfers. The 8/22/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 9 had a BIMS score of three, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident utilized a walker and wheelchair as mobility devices, required substantial to moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate dosing of opioid medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for complications related to narcotic medications. Findings include:The facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 1/2023 indicated the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders. If the dose seems excessive or unrelated to the resident's current condition, the nurse calls the pharmacy or prescriber for clarification. The clarification is documented in the resident's medication record. -Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the MAR.-If the label and MAR were different or if there was any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the prescriber's orders were to be checked for the correct dosage schedule. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including opioid abuse. Resident 3's 12/20/24 physician order indicated the resident was prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activity program for 3 of 4 sampled dependent residents (#s 28, 46 and 254) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Activity Program Policy, last revised 6/2018, indicated the following: -Activity programs were designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. -The activities program included facility-organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities. -The facility's activity programs were designed to encourage maximum individual participation and were geared to the individual resident's needs. -All activities were documented in the resident's medical record. 1. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including a brain stem stroke, severe dementia, Alzheimer's disease and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure meals served to residents in their rooms were served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 2 carts reviewed for food quality. This placed residents at risk for decreased enjoyment of food. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 10:00 AM Resident 40 stated the food temperature for breakfast was cold if she/he wanted to eat in her/his room. On 2/10/25 at 10:10 AM Resident 24 stated breakfast was cold when she/he wanted to eat in her/his room due to it sitting out there for too long. On 2/11/25 at 8:06 AM Resident 40 had breakfast in her/his room and stated, It's cold again. On 2/11/25 at 8:08 AM Resident 24 stated breakfast was served in her/his room and the breakfast was cold. On 2/11/25 at 8:16 AM Resident 15 stated breakfast served in her/his room was cold. An observation on 2/12/25 at 7:13 AM revealed kitchen staff obtained the temperature of the scrambled eggs, which was 188 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/12/25 at 8:22 AM staff began delivering trays. On 2/12/25 at 8:40 AM the last tray was served. On 2/12/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 1 of 2 unit refrigerators reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the US FDA 2022 Food Code indicated the following: -Food prepared and held cold must be clearly marked with date prepared or by day which the food shall be consumed or discarded. -Food must be labeled with a use-by-date if stored for at least 24 hours. -Food could be stored up to seven days. The facility's Resident Food from Outside Source Policy, dated 8/1/24, indicated the following: -Refrigerated food items from an outside source was stored in a container with the date the product was received, the name of the product and the resident's name and room number. -Unlabeled and undated foods would be discarded. On 2/11/25 at 3:50 PM Staff 3 (Administrator in Training) and Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident 303 admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including severe chest pain due to reduced blood flow to the heart muscle. Resident 303's 2/4/25 Physician Orders revealed PT and OT to be provided as indicated. Resident 303 was evaluated on 2/5/25 by the facility to begin PT four times per week. On 2/10/25 at 10:25AM Resident 303 reported she/he had not been receiving therapy. On 2/12/25 at 1:09PM Staff 11 (Director of Rehabilitation) confirmed Resident 303 was scheduled to have physical therapy four times per week and she/he did not receive therapy. Staff 11 stated there was no physical therapist available to work with Resident 303 and there was no plan in place for coverage when therapy staff were out. 3. Resident 254 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a serious brain injury that occurs when blood pools beneath the brain's outermost membrane). Resident 254's 1/31/25 Physician Orders directed the resident to receive physical therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for timing of wound care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for choices. This placed resident at risk for impaired sleep and reduced quality of life. Findings include: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including a stage four pressure ulcer and a non-pressure chronic ulcer with necrosis of the bone (non-healing open sore with loss of bone tissue). A review of Resident 42's physician orders indicated wound care was to be performed twice daily. A review of Resident 42's scheduled pain medication showed administration times to be at 6:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 6:00 PM, and 12:00 AM. Resident 42 also had physician orders for two other separate pain medications every three hours, as needed. On 1/28/25 Resident 42's admissions assessment noted Resident 42 to be social and looked forward to activities and it was very important for her/him to do things with groups of people. On 2/10/25 at 10:41 AM and on 2/12/25 at 1:32 PM, Resident 42 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents and their representatives with a baseline care plan and to ensure baseline care plans included care for an indwelling urinary catheter for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 46 and 254) reviewed for care planning and catheter care. This placed residents at risk for being uniformed of their plan of care and complications of catheter use. Findings include: The facility's 5/2024 Baseline Care Plan Policy indicated the following: -A baseline care plan was to be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission and was to be used until an interdisciplinary, person-centered and comprehensive care plan was developed. -The baseline care plan was to include instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident. -The resident and/or representative was to be provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including cognitive and communication deficit. Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services in the area of communication for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#254) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life and potential decline in their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Findings include: Resident 254 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including dementia and hearing loss. Resident 254's 1/30/25 Baseline Care Plan indicated the resident was hard of hearing and wore bilateral hearing aids, and staff were to ensure the resident's hearing aids were in her/his ears or were to use a dry erase board in order to ensure proper communication. On 2/10/25 at 10:44 AM, Resident 254 was observed in her/his room and sat in her/his wheelchair. No dry erase board was visible in the resident's room and the resident's hearing aids were in her/his ears. The state surveyor greeted the resident and spoke at a loud volume to which the resident stated, I can't hear you. On 2/10/25 at 10:45 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#21) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene. Findings include: Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and muscle weakness. Resident 21's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required one-person total assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. Resident 21 was observed on 2/10/25 at 12:28 PM, and on 2/12/25 at 1:10 PM, with a significant amount of chin hairs. On 2/10/25 at 12:28 PM, Resident 21 stated she/he did not want to have facial hair but was not able to look at herself/himself or touch her/his face due to lack of mobility in her/his arms from Parkinson's disease. Resident 21 stated she/he relied on staff to shave unwanted facial hair. On 2/12/25 at 3:33 PM, Staff 14 (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for daily wound care for 1 of 1 resident (#50) reviewed for discharge. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to chronic wounds. Findings included: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 for wound care with diagnoses including lower extremity venous stasis ulcers. admission orders dated 11/18/24 included silver sulfadiazine cream 1 %: Apply to right leg topically one time a day and as needed for wound care. Review of the 11/2024 TAR and nursing notes dated 11/20/24 revealed wound care was not provided on 11/20/24 due to the silver sulfadiazine cream not being available. There was no documentation on the TAR or in nursing notes to indicate if wound care was completed on 11/21/24, however, a physician progress note dated 11/22/24 revealed the resident complained to the provider she/he had not received wound care while in the facility. The resident left the facility AMA (against medical advise) later that day. An attempt was made to contact the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain and prevent a potential decrease in ROM or mobility for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 5 and 28) reviewed for restorative services. This placed residents at risk for loss of ROM and mobility. Findings include: The facility's Restorative Nursing Policy, dated 8/1/24, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to ensure that a resident's communication, mobility, range of motion, performance of ADLs, eating and toileting do not deteriorate unless the deterioration is unavoidable. Residents evaluated with deficits in communication, mobility, range of motion, performance of ADLs, eating or toileting received necessary care and services to attain and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. -Residents with the need to improve functional status were re-evaluated monthly to determine effectiveness of the current interventions and need to revise goals or interventions. -Residents with the need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and services related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#254) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for complications of catheter use. Findings include: The facility's 8/2024 Indwelling Urinary Catheter Policy and Procedure revealed a resident with a catheter was evaluated for the ongoing need for an indwelling catheter following their admission. If the resident did not have appropriate indications for continuing its use, the physician was to be contacted to determine if the catheter could be discontinued. If there was an appropriate indication for use, then orders were to be reviewed to include the medical justification for the catheter use, catheter size, frequency of catheter, bag and tubing changes and catheter irrigations if appropriate. Resident 254 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including complications associated with an indwelling urinary catheter with the presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were in place including monitoring and communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 27) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications and delayed treatment. Findings include: The facility's Dialysis policy, dated 8/1/24, indicated the following: a. The licensed nurse completes the Dialysis Center Communication Form prior to the resident leaving for dialysis. Weights are obtained from Dialysis Communication Center Form. b. Upon return, the post dialysis assessment portion of the form is completed and attached to the resident's medical record. *Note-Residents who require hemodialysis are provided ongoing assessment and monitoring of the resident's condition before and after dialysis treatments including for complications and interventions as part of nursing standard of practice. Issues are documented, as noted, by the licensed nurse and medical providers are notified. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received trauma informed care for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 27 and 46) reviewed for behavioral-emotional care and abuse. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include: The facility's 8/2024 Trauma-Informed Care Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -The facility screened newly admitted resident for indications of trauma as part of the comprehensive care plan process, accomplished through interview with the resident and/or her/his representative as appropriate. -The center developed an appropriate plan of care and interventions based upon the screening responses and observations of the resident. 1. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder). Resident 27's 11/22/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact, able to make herself/himself understood and understood others without difficulty. On 2/10/25 at 10:16 AM, and on 2/11/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 8/2024 Behavior Monitor Policy and Procedure directed the following: -Residents who resided in the facility who developed behavior symptoms received a comprehensive assessment completed by social services to identify potential precipitating factors as possible causes for behavior. -Target behavior was to be described as specifically as possible and interventions developed based on the resident's targeted behaviors. -If all behavior interventions were attempted and not effective, the charge nurse was to be notified. -The charge nurse was to further evaluate the resident and take further action to manage the behavioral symptoms. -The RNCM and DNS were to be notified through the 24-Hour Report of effectiveness or ineffectiveness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident dietary preferences for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for not receiving preferred food. Findings include: Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and cognitive and communication deficit. Resident 46's 1/21/25 Physician Orders directed the resident to receive a regular diet with a minced and moist texture. Resident 46's 1/24/25 Nutrition At Risk Evaluation revealed weight gain was desirable for the resident. A 1/24/25 Social Service Note revealed Witness 1 (Family Member) was informed Resident 46's meal portion size would be increased after she reported to Staff 5 (Social Services Director) the resident was hungry all of the time. On 2/10/25 at 3:04 PM, Witness 1 stated Resident 46 was hungry all of the time. Witness 1 stated she spoke with a staff member at the facility a few weeks ago and requested the resident to receive double portions at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) were followed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#45) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for infections, communicable disease and cross-contamination. Findings include: The CDC webinar titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Skilled Nursing Facilities, dated 11/15/22, indicated the following: -EBPs were a risk based approach to PPE use designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistent organisms (MDROs). -EBPs involved use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities with residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as, residents with wounds, indwelling catheters, central lines, feeding tubes, tracheostomies (a surgical opening in the neck where a tube is inserted to provide an artificial airway) and ventilators (a machine that helps people breath). The facility's Transmission Based Precautions Policy, dated 8/1/24, indicated the following: -When a resident was colonized with a MDRO, enhanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy and Procedure dated 8/2024, stated: Abuse is defined as: a. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. c. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental, physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 4/2017 with diagnoses including obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia. Resident 10's 1/13/25 Annual MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and PTSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#105) reviewed for dignity and abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: The facility's Courtesy Policy, last revised 5/2019, indicated all employees were expected to treat residents, families, visitors and fellow workers with kindness, respect and dignity. Resident 105 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. On 7/3/24 a public complaint was received by the State Agency which alleged Staff 7 (CNA) talked down to Resident 105 like she/he was a kid and stated, I don't know why you pee in the bed when you have a urinal. You do not need to pee in the bed. On 9/18/24 at 11:43 AM Resident 105 stated Staff 7 kept yelling and talking to her/him like, I am a teenager. Resident 105 stated she/he told Staff 7, I don't have to take it. Resident 105 stated she/he told other CNAs that Staff 7 yelled and cussed at her/him but nothing had gotten better. Resident 105…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to transport clean laundry to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination for spread of infection. Findings include: The facility's 4/2019 Laundry Handling Policy and Procedure indicated laundry personnel were to transport clean linens in a covered cart. On 10/18/23 at 8:57 AM Staff 16 (Housekeeping/Laundry Manager) was observed to transport and distribute clean laundry to residents using an uncovered wire basket on wheels. Staff 16 confirmed the clean laundry was to be covered while she delivered it to residents. On 10/18/23 at 1:56 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed laundry personnel were to transport clean linens in a covered cart. 2. Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of water borne pathogens for 1 of 1 facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications and a physician order was in place for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#142) observed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication-related consequences. Findings include: The facility's 3/2020 Self Administration of Medication Policy and Procedure outlined the following: -During the 14-day admission assessment period, the RCM (Resident Care Manager) evaluates the resident's ability to self-administer medications using the Self Administration Evaluation form. No medications are stored at bedside nor self-administered until evaluation [is] complete. -If the evaluation indicates that the resident has the cognitive, physical and emotional ability to self-administer his or her own medications in a safe and prudent manner, a plan for self-administration is established with the resident. A physician order is obtained indicating the specific medications that resident is able to self-administer.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a comfortable, clean and homelike environment for 1 of 1 dining room and 1 of 2 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for dining experience and environment. This placed residents at risk for an unsatisfying meal experience and living in an institutionalized environment. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the dining room for the lunch meal service on 10/18/23 between 11:54 AM and 12:35 PM, six residents were observed to sit at the dining room tables. In addition to nine dining room tables, the following items were observed in the dining room: -Two weight scales -A bed mattress -A wooden tripod -A power wheelchair -An orthopedic walker On 10/19/23 at 12:14 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) observed the dining room with the surveyor. Staff 1 acknowledged he expected the residents dining experience to be homelike, and the items stored in the dining room were not homelike. 2. On 10/17/23 at 10:52 AM the following was observed in Resident 13's room: -Small brown stains scattered on the wall beneath the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse by another resident for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#192) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 192 was admitted to the facility in 1/2020 with diagnoses including morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. A review of Resident 192's 3/10/23 Annual MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 193 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident 193's 4/19/23 admission MDS revealed she/he was severely cognitively impaired. A 5/29/23 FRI revealed on 5/29/23 at approximately 1:05 AM Resident 192 awoke and saw Resident 193's feet below the privacy curtain. Resident 192 opened the curtain and asked Resident 193 what she/he wanted. Resident 193 yelled at Resident 192 and accused her/him of taking Resident 193's watch. Resident 192 explained to Resident 193 the watch was on Resident 193's table. Resident 193 then struck Resident 192 across the face.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident centered care plans were implemented for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: The facility's 2/2019 Care Plan-[NAME] Policy and Procedure directed the following: -Staff to give care per the [NAME] (a condensed version of the resident Care Plan). -If the resident refused care or was unable to complete the task as outlined in the Care Plan, staff were responsible to report this to the charge nurse. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including other specified diseases of the spinal cord. Resident 29's 9/20/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required physical assistance from one person to walk in her/his room, to walk in the corridor and for locomotion on unit (how the resident moves between locations in his/her room and adjacent corridor on same floor). Resident 29's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure smoking materials were secured and not accessible to residents for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for access to hazardous materials and accidents. Findings include: The facility's 3/2020 Smoking Policy and Procedure Independent and Supervised outlined the following: -Residents who wish to smoke have a smoking evaluation completed on admission or at the time they decide to smoke to evaluate their ability to smoke safely and appropriately manage their smoking materials. -For residents requiring assistance/supervision with managing their smoking material the center establishes and provides appropriate storage method per assessment. -Residents who are safe to smoke independently and safely manage their smoking materials are allowed to do so in a manner that is safe according to the assessment. -Should any incidents of unsafe smoking or unsafe management of smoking materials occur, nursing staff are notified immediately, and a new smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable and attractive for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic breathing condition). Resident 18's 6/24/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 10/17/23 at 1:29 PM Resident 18 stated she/he often received food she/he was not able to eat because it was overcooked and hard. Resident 18 stated she/he received a toasted cheese sandwich which was burnt on one side and not toasted on the other side. On 10/18/23 at 12:54 PM Resident 18 was observed to sit in her/his room with an untouched meal tray on the bedside table in front of her/him. Resident 18 stated the meat looked awful and was too hard to eat. Resident 18 stated she/he tried to eat a slimy looking Brussels sprouts but she/he spit it out. Resident 18 stated the mashed potatoes were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident alternative meal replacements for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#18) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for food choices not being honored and unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic breathing condition). Resident 18's 6/24/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 18's 10/2023 Physician Diet Order instructed the facility to provide a heart healthy meal and extra protein with every meal. On 10/19/23 at 12:47 PM a test tray consisting of fish sticks, tartar sauce, a slice of bread, cooked cabbage, pudding and condiments was sampled. The sampled food lacked flavor. No alternative meal tray was provided to the surveyors due to inadequate food supply. The Alternative Menu indicated the following options were available for lunch and dinner meals (no alternatives offered for breakfast): - Peanut Butter and Jelly:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-15 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete nurse aide performance reviews at least every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 5 of 5 CNAs (#s 9, 12, 20, 22 and 23) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 8/10/22 at 10:01 AM facility staff records for Staff 9 (CNA), Staff 12 (CNA), Staff 20 (CNA), Staff 22 (CNA) and Staff 23 (CNA) were reviewed with Staff 16 (HR/Payroll/Staffing) and revealed no information related to annual CNA performance reviews being completed and no regular in-service education was done based on the outcome of the reviews. On 8/10/22 at 9:18 AM and 10:15 AM Staff 9 (CNA) and Staff 12 (CNA) stated they did not receive annual performance reviews. On 8/10/22 at 3:20 PM and 4:09 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 8 (Director of Operations) stated they had no annual performance reviews for the identified CNA staff and they were aware the facility was not in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food sanitation. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and food borne illness. Findings include: Observations in the kitchen, dry storage area, refrigerator and freezer revealed the following: -On 8/8/22 at 9:34 AM raw fruit peels were observed to be placed on top of fresh strawberries that were observed sitting on the kitchen countertop; -On 8/8/22 at 9:44 AM the reach in freezer contained used, unmarked, unlabeled meat, vegetables and fruits, all with significant freezer burn; -On 8/9/22 at 2:27 PM a reach in refrigerator contained undated roast beef which was heavily grayed from freezer burn. The refrigerator contained an open bowl of of shriveled and wilted onions. -On 8/9/22 at 2:36 PM multiple open containers of spices including oregano, cream of tartar, bay leaves and cocoa powder were noted without a date; -On 8/9/22 at 2:38 PM the reach in freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the building was clean and kept in good repair for 3 of 3 resident halls and 1 of 1 main resident lobby area reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt and unhomelike environment. Findings include: From 8/8/22 through 8/10/22 between the hours of 10:30 AM and 12:20 PM, the following observations were made: -A blue cloth chair in the east hallway was stained on the seat cushion and an end table had large white stains on the table top; -The main resident lobby area door where residents exited to the back patio had numerous large, deep scrapes and areas lacking paint; -Walls were scraped and gouged behind chairs in the resident main lobby area; -The wall to the left of the dining room door and the wall under the light switch near the administrative offices were scraped and gouged; -Hand railings down each hallway were scraped and gouged; -The windows or sliding glass doors in room [ROOM NUMBER],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 35) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 2/2/22. The resident's last covered day of Part A services was 2/18/22 and the facility intiated a discharge from Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. The resident remained in the facility. A review of the resident's medical record indicated written SNF ABN information was not issued to Resident 5. On 8/11/22 at 10:32 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the facility was required to provide written notification of non-coverage to Resident 5 and the facility failed to provide the resident with the required written information. 2. Resident 35 admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 7/21/22. The resident's last covered day of Part A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for negative physical and psychosocial outcomes. Findings include: Resident 7 was admitted in 2/2022 with diagnoses including altered mental status. Resident 31 was admitted in 4/2017 with diagnoses including adult personality and behavior disorder. A facility Resident to Resident Incident investigation revealed on 3/25/22 at approximately 2:25 PM, Resident 31 was outside in the smoking area with Resident 7. Resident 31 walked towards Resident 7 and Resident 7 stated, don't come by me thief. Resident 31 pinched and pushed Resident 7, then followed the resident to the outside door and hit Resident 7 on the back. On 8/8/22 at 11:56 AM and 8/11/22 at 11:31 AM Resident 7 confirmed Resident 31 pinched her/his arm and struck her/him on the back and stated she/he still felt angry and uneasy about the incident. Resident 7 stated it hurt when Resident 31 pinched and punched her/him. On 8/8/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for bathing services. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2/2022 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis and muscle pain. Resident 5's 2/9/22 admission MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person for bathing. Resident 5's current bathing Care Plan indicated the resident required one person extensive assistance for bathing with bathing scheduled on Tuesday and Friday mornings. The 7/2022 and 8/2022 Bathing Documentation Survey Report indicated the resident received bathing on 7/6/22 and 7/20/22. No bathing was provided in 8/2022 until 8/10/22. On 8/8/22 at 1:49 PM Resident 5 stated she/he did not receive bathing services very often which bothered her/him. On 8/10/22 at 9:10 AM and 10:28 AM Staff 9 (CNA) and Staff 10 (CNA) stated Resident 5 was supposed to receive bathing services twice a week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication administration, failed to monitor the resident when medication was missed and failed to notify the resident's provider of missed medication doses for 1 of 7 sampled residents (# 35) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse consequences of missed medication doses. Findings include: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular, rapid heart rate) and diabetes. Resident 35's 7/28/22 admission MDS revealed no cognitive impairment. A 7/21/22 physician's order indicated Resident 35 was prescribed amlodipine (a medication to treat high blood pressure and heart disease) 2.5 mg by mouth one time a day for [resident's] heart. A review of Resident 35's 8/2022 MAR revealed Resident 35 was not administered amlodipine on 8/7, 8/8 or 8/9. The medication was marked as NA (not available) on all three days. The resident's blood pressure was within normal limits on the above mentioned dates per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate for 18 of 39 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incorrect staffing information. Findings include: Review of the 7/2022 through 8/8/22 DCSDR postings and Daily Nursing Rosters indicated the following days when CNA numbers and hours worked were inaccurately recorded: -7/2, 7/7, 7/8, 7/9, 7/11, 7/12, 7/18, 7/20, 7/21, 7/25, 7/28, 7/30, 8/1, 8/3, 8/4, 8/5, 8/6 and 8/7. On 8/9/22 at 9:58 AM Staff 16 (HR/Payroll/Staffing) reported she was responsible to ensure the DCSDR postings were accurate. Staff 16 stated she counted all CNAs as one CNA regardless of how many hours they worked per shift and reported she was unsure how CNA numbers were properly counted. On 8/11/22 at 11:13 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed CNA numbers on the DCSDR postings were incorrectly reported on the days identified.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication was stored securely for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#35) assessed to be safe to have medications at bedside. This placed residents at risk for a loss of medications or unauthorized individuals to access medications. Findings include: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with diagnoses including COPD (a lung disease which makes it difficult to breathe). On 8/8/22 at 9:16 AM and 8/9/22 at 12:34 PM and 3:19 PM Resident 35 was observed to have the following medications unsecured on her/his bed or on top of her/his bedside table: -Fluticasone Nasal Suspension (nasal spray); -Ipratropium Bromide Nasal Solution (nasal spray) and -Anoro Ellipta (inhaler to treat COPD). A review of Resident 35's physician orders indicated the resident had current orders for the medications observed at the resident's bedside on 8/8/22 and 8/9/22. Resident 35's 7/28/22 admission MDS revealed no cognitive impairment. Resident 35's 8/4/22 Administration of Medication Evaluation revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received scheduled therapy service for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for therapy services. This placed residents at risk for decreased mobility independence. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including a right lower extremity below the knee amputation. In a therapy encounter note from 6/24/22 at 2:15 PM, Resident 17 was evaluated by physical therapy and had goals developed to improve her/his independence with mobility. Resident 17 requested to receive physical therapy services twice a week to assist with her/his recovery. Review of physical therapy treatment encounter notes from 6/24/22 through 8/6/22 revealed Resident 17 was only provided physical therapy once a week from 7/17/22 through 7/30/22 and not provided any physical therapy from 7/31/22 through 8/6/22. On 8/8/22 at 11:08 AM Resident 17 stated she/he did not receive therapy as scheduled during the prior three weeks. On 8/10/22 at 4:07 PM Staff 7 (Rehab Director) stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-02-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and the public at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 9:49 AM the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) posted for 2/10/25 was incomplete for the morning shift. On 2/12/25 at 5:40 AM the DCSDR posted for 2/11/25 was incomplete for the morning, evening, and night shift. On 2/12/25 at 12:43 PM, there was a DCSDR posted by the front entrance of the facility and another DCSDR posted next to where staff clocked in and out. The information on the two forms did not match. On 2/12/25 at 3:40 PM the DCSDR posted for 2/12/25 was incomplete for the morning shift. During an interview on 2/18/25 at 10:59 AM, Staff 31 (Staffing Coordinator) stated the DCSDR were expected to be complete and accurate by 8:00 AM for the morning shift, 4:00 PM for the evening shift, and 12:00 AM for the night shift. Staff 31 stated the DCSDR was to be posted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$4,194 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| BRZYCKI, TRACY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2024 |
| CARNAGIE, RUSSELL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| LARSON, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/10/2024 |
| PORTLAND 8643 REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $623K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.