Glisan Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 78.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.96 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired residents did not have access to excessively hot liquids for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed accidents and hazards. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a second-degree burn (partial thickness involving the first two layers of skin) to her/his thigh. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. A 11/13/23 progress note indicated Staff 9 (Agency CNA) notified Staff 2 (LPN) that Resident 2 spilled hot coffee on her/his lap. A 11/13/23 facility investigation revealed nursing staff took the coffee cart out of the kitchen prior to the coffee cooling to a safe temperature. Resident 2 was provided with coffee that was too hot (above 155 degrees). The resident was found by Staff 9 after she/he spilled the coffee in her/his lap. A 11/23/23 progress note indicated Resident 2 was assessed to have a second degree burn described as a large area of reddened skin noted to the right lateral thigh with several ruptured…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow the resident's plan of care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for falls. As a result, Resident 1 fell and suffered a subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed), and placed all residents at risk for significant injury. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 11/2011 with diagnoses including heart failure and osteoporosis. The 1/7/24 Annual MDS revealed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. The 1/15/24 ADL Care Plan revealed Resident 1 required two person extensive assistance for bed mobility and two or more person assistance to transfer with the mechanical lift. The 3/19/24 Progress Notes revealed at 5:30 AM, Resident 1 fell out of bed, hit her/his head on the floor and assessed to have a bruise on her/his scalp. The floor mats were not in place at the time of the fall as they were removed in preparation for the upcoming mechanical lift transfer. At approximately 11:00 AM, the resident complained of increased neck and upper back pain, the provider was notified and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure fall risk interventions were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#13) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in Resident 13 sustaining wrist and leg fractures which placed residents at risk for falls and injuries. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (difficulty breathing), stroke and diabetes. Resident 13's Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition and needed extensive assistance with ADLs. Resident 13's Care Plan dated 6/21/23 identified the resident was at risk for falls due to gait/balance problems. Interventions on the care plan included: extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, staff were to anticipate the resident's needs, keep the call light and personal items within reach, the resident was to wear non-skid footwear and promptly respond to all requests for assistance. A FRI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured for 1 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 3 treatment carts reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to medications. Findings include: The facility's undated Storage of Medication Policy indicated only licensed nurses, pharmacy staff and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aides) are allowed access to the medication carts. Medication rooms, cabinets and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. 1. On 3/11/26 from 5:08 AM to 5:22 AM, an unlocked and unattended treatment cart was observed in the east hall across from the nurse's station. Two boxes of enoxaparin (an injectable anticoagulant [blood thinner]) for Resident 15 were observed on top of the cart. CNA staff were in the area, one resident was observed to self-propel in her/his wheelchair near the cart, and the contents of the cart were accessible. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly store food and failed to maintain sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 unit refrigerators and 1 of 1 unit freezers. This placed residents at risk for food borne illness and contaminated food. Findings include:The facility's 11/2022 Food Receiving and Storage Policy indicated:-All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated; and;-Foods in the walk-ins are stored off the floor. On 3/9/26 at 9:03 AM, observation of the unit refrigerator and the unit freezer revealed the following items:-Two unlabeled, undated plastic bags of hot dogs;-One unlabeled, undated large container of sliced pepperonis;-One unlabeled, undated small container of lemon wedges;-One unlabeled, undated large container of shredded cheese;-One unlabeled plastic container of pulled pork;-One unlabeled medium container of corn dated 3/2;-One unlabeled medium container of chicken fried steak dated 2/17;-One unlabeled medium container of spaghetti sauce dated 12/3;-One box of opened ice cream bars…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate use and disposal of personal protective equipment in accordance with CDC guidelines and failed to ensure the separation of soiled and clean linens for 1 of 1 facility. These failures placed residents at risk for infections and cross contamination. Finding include: The CDC's 2/11/25 Eye Protection for Infection Control website, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ppe/eye-safety/infection-control.html, specified to remove eye protection, such as face shields, by only handling the parts that secure it to the head (like plastic temples, elastic bands, or ties) and to avoid touching the front of face shields, as those surfaces are most likely contaminated by sprays or droplets. Non-disposable eye protection should be placed in a designated container for cleaning and disinfection. The facility's Droplet/Contact Precautions sign dated 5/2020 included the following: - Wear eye protection (face shield or goggles).- Remove…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 10, 13 and 60) reviewed for self-administration. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include:The facility's Self Administration of Medication dated 8/2024 included the following:- No medications are stored at bedside nor self-administered until evaluation complete.- A physician order is obtained indicating the specific medications that resident is able to self-administer.- If the resident chooses to have the medications at the bedside, they are contained in a locked cupboard or drawer.- Medications are indicated on the MAR as self-administered. - The resident is reevaluated for continued ability to self-administer their medications annually and with significant change in condition.1. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility 7/2025 with diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a syndrome of global brain dysfunction caused by underlying systemic illnesses). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a homelike environment and loss of sleep. Findings include:The facility's 2/2021 Homelike Environment Policy indicated the facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting, including comfortable sound levels. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including insomnia. Resident 1's 2/5/26 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. On 3/10/26 at 9:50 AM, Resident 1 was observed in her/his room in bed. Resident 1 stated the backdoor, located just outside of her/his room, was broken and the alarm attached to the door would ring and ring and ring when the door was not shut properly. Resident 1 stated the sound of the alarm was constant, and at night, it prevented her/him from sleeping. Resident 1 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments in the areas of cognition and mood for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#62) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unassessed needs. Findings include:Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including acquired absence of larynx (the surgical removal of the voice box [laryngectomy]) and encounter for attention to tracheostomy (a surgically created opening [stoma] in the front of the neck leading directly into the trachea [windpipe] to create a new airway for breathing). Resident 62's 2/26/26 admission MDS revealed the resident had no speech but was able to communicate to and understand others without difficulty. The MDS further revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and Resident Mood Interview (PHQ-2 to 9) were not completed as the resident was rarely/never understood. On 3/9/26 at 11:51 AM, Resident 62 was observed in her/his room. The resident was nonverbal but able to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care and assistance to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 3 and 72) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor grooming and loss of dignity. Findings include:1 Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with diagnoses including quadriplegia and Type 2 diabetes. On 3/9/26 at 11:10 AM Resident 3 was observed in her/his room. Resident 3's fingernails were long and contained a thick, skin-colored debris beneath the nails. The ADL Function CAA dated 8/14/25 indicated Resident 3 required maximum assistance with all ADLs. A Physician Order dated 9/10/25 directed a licensed nurse to check Resident 3's fingernails and toenails weekly on bath days and trim as needed. A review of the 2/2026 and 3/2026 TAR indicated a licensed nurse was to check Resident 3's fingernails and toenails weekly on bath days and trim as needed. On 3/10/26 at 2:22 PM Staff 10 (CNA) stated a licensed nurse would have to trim Resident 3's fingernails due…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 1 of 2 sampled residents (s 3) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: An undated Facility Activity Programs Policy Statement indicated:-Activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident.-The activities program is provided to support the well-being of residents and to encourage both independence and community interaction.-Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident.-The activities program is ongoing and includes facility organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities.-Activities are scheduled 7 (seven) days a week.-Our activity programs consist of individual, small group and large group activities designed to meet the needs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed to independently perform tracheostomy care and a person-centered care plan was developed for respiratory care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#62) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for respiratory distress and unmet needs. Findings include:The facility's 8/2024 Respiratory Treatment Policy and Procedure indicated residents received respiratory treatments and monitoring according to their physician orders, standards of practice and care plan. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including acquired absence of larynx (the surgical removal of the voice box [laryngectomy]) and encounter for attention to tracheostomy (a surgically created opening [stoma] in the front of the neck leading directly into the trachea [windpipe] to create a new airway for breathing). Resident 62's 2/20/26 Nursing admission Assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact, nonverbal and communicated her/his needs in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain dental services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for difficulty with eating. Findings include:Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 10/2020 with diagnoses including malnutrition.A 12/8/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 16 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact. A 10/27/20 Care Plan indicated staff coordinated and made arrangements for dental care services and indicated Resident 16 had her/his own teeth. A 7/22/25 Dental Treatment Summary indicated Resident 16 had all her/his teeth extracted. On 3/9/26 at 2:38 PM, Resident 16 stated she/he had all her/his teeth extracted eight months earlier, had repeatedly asked staff about getting dentures without receiving a response, and was having trouble chewing and eating.On 3/12/26 at 11:35 AM, Staff 42 (CNA) stated Resident 16 had her/his own teeth and did not require assistance to complete dental hygiene. On 3/12/26 at 12:21 PM and 1:26 PM, Staff 19 (Social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $971K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR