No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Menlo Park Post Acute

745 NE 122nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97230 · For profit - Corporation · 83 certified beds · (503) 252-0241 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 252-0241 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1350 NE 122nd Ave Ste 200 · (503) 408-7008 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12112 NE Glisan St · (503) 261-0303 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11679 NE Glisan St · (503) 954-2596 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1017 NE 117th Ave · (503) 823-7503 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11954 NE Glisan St · (260) 415-3458

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.9%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.2%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.7%95.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.1%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.6%13.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.0%81.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.5%21.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%16.1%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.0%CMS range 37.4–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.1–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
39.5%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 71.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.29 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include:Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, unspecified conjunctivitis, perforated corneal ulcer, and dependence on renal dialysis.Resident 6's 2/8/26 comprehensive MDS assessment documented Resident 6 had a medically complex condition including perforated corneal ulcer in her/his right eye and conjunctivitis with bacterial agents as the disease. Resident 6's Care Plan initiated on 2/12/26 documented Resident 6 was at risk for complications related to a bilateral eye infection. Erythromycin (an antibiotic) eyedrops were initiated on 2/12/26. Resident 6's 2/12/26 Physician Orders included erythromycin ophthalmic ointment 5 mg to apply in left eye five times a day. Resident 6's 2/2026 MAR documented the following:-On 2/16/26 at 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures met the minimum requirements for 1 of 1 dishwasher and failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 1 of 1 resident refrigerator reviewed for the kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses, communicable diseases, and un-sanitized dishware and utensils. Findings include: The facility's Dishwashing policy dated 8/2024 included the following:- Do not run dishes through until machine has reached proper temperature for your specific machine. This may take multiple cycles.- Check for proper temperatures and pressure. Log Temps, if deficient, tell FNS Manager and/or Maintenance Director. The facility's Resident Food from Outside Source policy dated 8/2024 included the following:- Refrigerated food items from an outside source is stored in a container with the following information on it: date product was received, name of product, resident name and room number. - Refrigerated foods that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 3 of 26 sampled residents (#s 30, 62 and 66) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include:1. Resident 66 was admitted to the facility in 1/2021 with a diagnosis of an encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Resident 66's 1/6/26 Annual MDS Assessment was listed in her/his health record as in progress and was not signed or submitted by the recertification survey exit date of 2/13/26. On 2/13/26 at 12:21 PM Staff 36 (RN, MDS Coordinator) acknowledged Resident 66's 1/6/26 Annual MDS Assessment was not completed within 14 days of the Assessment Review Date (ARD). Staff 36 stated the assessment was partially completed and not ready to be submitted. Staff 36 stated the assessment was a priority but she did not know when she would be able to complete it and submit it. On 2/13/26 at 1:10 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete Quarterly MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 7 of 8 sampled residents (#s 12, 15, 26, 45, 51, 67 and 80) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include:1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with a diagnosis of pneumonia. Resident 12's 1/6/26 Quarterly MDS was listed as in her/his health record as in progress and was not completed or signed by the recertification survey exit date of 2/13/26. On 2/13/26 at 12:21 PM Staff 36 (RN, MDS Coordinator) acknowledged Resident 12's 1/6/26 Quarterly MDS Assessment was not completed within 14 days of the Assessment Review Date (ARD). Staff 36 stated there were still sections of the assessment that she needed to complete before she submitted it. On 2/13/26 at 1:10 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the resident's assessment was not completed timely and he knew it was also an issue for other residents. Staff 1 stated he expected all residents' MDS Assessments to be completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide resident centered activities for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 2, 3, 20, 30 and 60) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's undated Activities policy included the following: - Activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident.- Activities are considered any endeavor, other than routine ADLs, in which the resident participates, that is intended to enhance his or her sense of wellbeing and to promote or enhance physical, cognitive or emotional health.- Activities are not necessarily limited to formal activities being provided only by activities staff.- Other facility staff may also provide the activities.- Scheduled activities are posted on the resident bulletin board. Activity schedules are also provided individually to residents who cannot access the bulletin board (e.g., bed bound or visually impaired residents).- Residents are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified professional to direct the activities program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Findings include:On 2/12/26 at 3:15 PM, Staff 9 (Activities Director) stated she was recently promoted to Activities Director and was not aware of any certifications, trainings, or qualifications required for the position. Staff 9 confirmed she was the person who planned the group and individual activities for residents.On 2/13/26 at 8:13 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed Staff 9 had been the Activities Director since 12/2025 and did not have the appropriate certifications, trainings, or qualifications for the role.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and garbage storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 garbage area reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for exposure to pathogens related to the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include: On 2/9/26 at 9:24 AM, the facility's dumpsters were observed to be very full and the doors did not close to enclose the trash.On 2/10/26 at 9:18 AM, the facility's dumpsters were observed to be very full and had trash overflowing from the top. Two inside out gloves were observed on the concrete where the dumpsters were and one large trash bag was placed in front of the dumpsters. On 2/10/26 at 3:30 PM, the facility's dumpsters were observed to be very full, trash overflowing from the top and four large bags were in front of the dumpsters. The ground around the dumpsters was observed to have miscellaneous trash items.On 2/11/26 at 5:00 AM, the facility's dumpsters were observed to be very full, trash overflowing from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed for 1 of 1 sampled employee (#27) and 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s) reviewed for infection prevention and control practices. This placed residents at risk for infections. Findings include:The 8/1/24 Hand Hygiene policy and procedure specified hand hygiene was required before and after assisting a resident with personal care, after handling soiled or used linens, before applying gloves, and after removing gloves. 1.On 2/10/26 at 9:09 AM Staff 27 (CNA) was observed wearing gloves and providing cares to Resident 8 who was on contact precautions (infection-control measures used to prevent the spread of germs). These cares included touching the resident's gown, legs and bedding, and combing her/his hair. Staff 27 placed the resident's linens into a bag, removed her gloves, and exited the room using the gloves to carry the bag. Staff 27 was observed continuously as she dropped off the dirty linens, proceeded down the hall with the dirty gloves in hand,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 13 and 47) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include:The facility's Self-Administration of Medication policy dated 8/2024 included the following:- Medication at bedside is stored in closed, locked cupboards or drawers. This includes over the counter medications.- The RCM (Resident Care Manager) evaluates the resident's ability to self-administer medications using the Self Administration Evaluation form. No medications are stored at bedside nor self-administered until evaluation complete. - A physician order is obtained indicating the specific medications that resident is able to self-administer.- Drug storage is the responsibility of the nursing staff. - Medications are indicated on the MAR as self-administered. 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with a diagnosis of fracture of neck of left femur. The Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident right to privacy was honored for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#64) reviewed for privacy. The placed residents at risk for exposure of personal information. Findings include:Resident 64 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including heart failure.Resident 64's 8/15/25 admission MDS assessed her/him to be cognitively intact.Review of the 11/2025 Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed the council had a concern of to much into personal business. The 11/18/25 written response by Staff 8 (Social Services Director) revealed Resident 64 was upset because call was placed to APS [Adult protective Services] regarding misappropriation of funds.On 2/13/26 at 9:24 AM Staff 9 (Activity Director) acknowledged she assisted the residents with the Resident Council meetings. Staff 9 confirmed she read the written responses from the meeting minutes to the Resident Council out loud, exactly as written. Staff 9 confirmed Resident 64's name was written in the 11/2025 Resident Council meeting minutes.On 2/13/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 2 of 5 sampled resident (#42 and 45) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for complications and discomfort. Findings include: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 11/24/25 Modified Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 42 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The 9/5/25 Care Plan indicated the nursing staff completed nail trimming for Resident 42 and staff monitored skin conditions when care was provided and staff notified the nurse of any open areas or red skin areas. A review of Resident 42's Physician Orders on 2/2026 indicated the nurses checked fingernails and toenails once a week on bath days and trimmed the residents nails as needed. Resident 42 was scheduled for evening showers on Sunday and Wednesday. The 3/10/25 Skin & Wound Evaluation indicated Resident 42's right plantar foot wound was healed. An attached picture of Resident 42's right plantar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure trauma informed care was assessed to ensure proper practices were provided for 2 of 2 resident (#s 3 and 10) reviewed for mood and behavior. This placed residents at risk for triggered responses and re-traumatization. Findings include: A facility Trauma-Informed Care policy dated 8/2024 included the focus of four areas when care interventions are developed and strategies to support resident with trauma history. Those four areas include: -Realize the prevalence of trauma through education and training of care staff, -Recognize how trauma affects individuals through evaluation and identification of triggers, -Responding and putting knowledge into practice through development of resident=centered care planning, and -Resisting re-traumatization through avoiding identified triggers and making empathetic, reasonable modifications to the care approach and environment. 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate indications for medication use for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include:Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body) and wounds. The 1/10/26 Care Plan identified Resident's 10's pain would be relieved to a tolerable level as indicated by the resident. A 1/11/26 Physician's Order was in place for Morphine Sulfate 10 MG/5 ML every six hours as needed for pain. The 1/16/26 admission MDS revealed a BIMS score of 14 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident received scheduled and PRN pain medications. The 1/2026 and 2/2026 MARs showed Staff 27 (CMA) administered PRN Morphine with a pain rating of zero seven times in the two-month period on 1/21/26, 1/22/26, 1/28/26, 1/29/26, 2/4/26, and 2/5/26.The 1/2026 and 2/2026 Progress Notes contained no additional assessment or justification for the dates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide emergency dental services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for dental care. This placed residents at risk for acute dental pain and poor appetite. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes.The 9/5/25 Care Plan indicated Resident 42 had her/his own teeth and required assistance setting up when oral hygiene was performed. The 11/24/25 Modification of Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 42 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and Resident 42 did not have dental pain, discomfort and difficulty chewing. The 11/2025 Documentation Survey Report indicated Resident 42 was not verbally or physically aggressive to other residents or staff. A 11/21/25 Progress Note indicated Resident 42 was verbally aggressive with staff and reported toothache. A 11/25/25 Progress Note indicated Staff 31 (Social Services Assistant) called to make an emergent dental appointment but the clinic advised her to call back the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 5 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel records on 11/6/24 at 12:01 PM with Staff 23 (Human Resources/Payroll) indicated the following employees had not received their annual performance evaluations: -Staff 6 (CNA), hire date 9/17/15: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 7 (CNA), hire date 9/16/14: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 8 (CNA), hire date 9/15/17: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 9 (CNA), hire date 8/1/08: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 10 (CNA), hire date 6/24/14: no annual performance review was completed. On 11/6/24 at 12:01 PM Staff 23 confirmed annual performance reviews for Staff 6, Staff 7, Staff 8, Staff 9 and Staff 10 were not completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 5 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care. Findings include: On 11/6/24 at 1:19 PM Staff 23 (Human Resources/Payroll) provided a list of annual training hours for CNA staff which revealed the following: -Staff 6 (CNA): 0 annual training hours; -Staff 7 (CNA): 8 annual training hours; -Staff 8 (CNA): 11 annual training hours; -Staff 9 (CNA): 0 annual training hours and -Staff 10 (CNA) 8 annual training hours. On 11/6/24 at 1:19 PM Staff 23 confirmed Staff 6, Staff 7, Staff 8, Staff 9 and Staff 10 did not complete the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. On 11/8/24 at 11:09 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged CNA staff were required to have 12 hours of annual in-service training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for a lessened quality of life. Findings include: Observations on 11/5/24 through 11/8/24 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 12:35 PM revealed meals were served with plastic spoons, plastic glasses and Styrofoam cups. On 11/5/24 at 12:38 PM Resident 66 was eating lunch. Resident 66 held up a plastic spoon and stated, they give us this crap to eat with. On 11/6/24 at 1:38 PM Staff 29 (CNA) stated residents usually received regular forks and knives but were given plastic spoons, plastic glasses and Styrofoam cups for at least the past month. Staff 29 stated this was not homelike. On 11/6/24 at 1:42 PM Staff 30 (Dietary Manager) stated the facility did not have enough glasses, cups or silverware for all of the meal service. Staff 30 stated plasticware and Styrofoam cups were not homelike. On 11/8/24 at 9:17 AM Staff 13 (Activities Director) confirmed multiple residents complained about paper and Styrofoam cups,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were maintained within secured (locked) locations, accessible only to designated staff for 3 of 6 medication and treatment carts reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for unsafe access to medications and diversion of medication. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Storage of Medication Policy stated: In order to limit access to prescription medications, only licensed nurses, pharmacy staff, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aides) are allowed access to medication carts. Medication rooms, cabinets and medications supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. 1. On 11/6/24 at 1:38 PM a treatment cart was observed to be unlocked on Hall 1. The nurse was not in view of the cart. On 11/6/24 at 1:47 PM Staff 12 (LPN) confirmed the cart was unlocked. 2. On 11/7/24 at 9:53 AM a medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended on Hall 3. On 11/7/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the ice machine and ice machine scoop were cleaned adequately to maintain sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary kitchen services. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 11/4/24 at 9:34 AM the ice machine adjacent to the kitchen was observed to have a pink/black substance on a plastic shield inside the machine. Condensation was observed dripping over the substance onto the ice. On 11/4/24 at 9:39 AM Staff 18 (Maintenance Director) stated the ice machine was cleaned every month. Staff 18 acknowledged the presence of the pink/black substance and confirmed the ice machine should be free of any debris or contaminants. On 11/4/24 at 9:58 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the existence of pink/black substance inside the ice machine and stated the ice machine needed to be cleaned. 2. On 11/4/24 at 9:34 AM the ice machine scoop located on the wall next to the ice machine was observed to be stored in a clear plastic container with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and/or the residents' responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 34 and 66) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: The facility's Psychoactive Medications policy, dated 8/1/24, indicated risks and benefits of drug use and revealed informed consent was to be obtained from the resident/resident representative prior to administration of any psychoactive medication. 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. Resident 34's 10/2024 MAR revealed the resident received the following psychotropic medications as ordered by her/his physician: -Buspirone (a medication to treat anxiety), three times a day for anxiety. -Sertraline (a medication to treat depression), one time a day for major depression. -Clonidine (a medication to treat anxiety), every 6 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 19 admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including infection and anxiety disorder. A 10/10/24 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 19 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including amputation and obesity. A 10/23/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 17 was cognitively intact. On 11/6/24 at 11:55 AM Resident 17 was observed to enter the doorway of Resident 19's room where she/he proceeded to yell and swear at Resident 19. Resident 17 told Resident 19 to stop fucking yelling out and to turn her/his damn tv down. The interaction was observed by Staff 13 (Activities Director), Staff 22 (Physical Therapy Assistant), Staff 21 (CMA) and Witness 1 (Family Member). On 11/6/24 at 12:02 PM Staff 22 stated he was doing a therapy session with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 60) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's 8/2024 Abuse Screening, Training, Identification, Investigation, Reporting and Protection policy directed the following: -Any suspicion of a crime requires notification of law enforcement and the State survey agency immediately by the person who first forms the suspicion of the crime for sexual abuse. -If, with the suspicion of a crime, there is abuse or a serious injury, the staff member must report the incident within 2 hours of forming the suspicion to law enforcement and the State survey agency. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including C-difficile infection (a bacterial infection in the colon). Resident 60's 10/15/24 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and alcohol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to residents and their representatives, and to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalizations for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#73) reviewed for hospitalizations. This placed residents at risk for lack of information regarding their options, rights, and lack of advocacy from the Ombudsman Office. Findings include: Resident 73 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including complications of a foreign body accidentally left in the body following heart catheterization (a procedure that uses a catheter to diagnose and treat heart conditions). A review of Resident 73's health record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No evidence was found in Resident 73's health record to indicate a transfer notice with appeal rights was provided in writing to the resident or their representative upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#73) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include: Resident 73 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including complications of a foreign body accidentally left in the body following heart catheterization (a procedure that uses a catheter to diagnose and treat heart conditions). A review of Resident 73's health record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No evidence was found in Resident 73's health record to indicate a written bed hold policy with reserved bed payment was provided to the resident or their representative upon transferring to the hospital on [DATE]. On 11/7/24 at 2:50 PM Staff 2 (Interim DNS) stated the charge nurse was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8, 34 and 66) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including major depression and diabetes. a. A 10/28/24 Physician Order indicated Resident 34 was prescribed clonidine (an anti-anxiety medication) one tablet every six hours as needed. Hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP-the maximum pressure in your blood vessels when your heart contracts and pumps blood) was less than 110. Resident 34's 10/2024 MAR indicated the resident received clonidine one time on 10/29/24, three times on 10/30/24 and one time on 10/31/24. A review of Resident 34's health record revealed no evidence the resident's blood pressure was assessed prior to administering clonidine. On 11/7/24 at 8:33 AM Staff 12 (LPN) reviewed Resident 34's MAR and stated the resident's SBP was not assessed prior to administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist in vision care needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for impaired vision. Findings include: Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including major depression and diabetes. A 12/27/23 Request for Medical Eye Care, resident authorization form, indicated Resident 34 consented to have a vision examination on 12/27/23. The 9/14/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 34 had intact cognitive functioning and the resident wore glasses. A review of Resident 34's heath record revealed no evidence a vision examination was scheduled or completed. Observations from 11/5/24 through 11/7/24 between the hours of 10:14 AM and 9:01 PM revealed Resident 34 was not wearing glasses. On 11/5/24 at 9:23 AM, Resident 34 stated she/he was supposed to get glasses last year around Christmastime but nothing happened. Resident 34 stated she/he asked for an appointment several times but was yet to be scheduled for a vision examination. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 39) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 8/2024 Trauma-Informed Care Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -Realize the prevalence of trauma: Through education and training of care staff, -Recognize how trauma affects individuals: Through education and identification of triggers, -Responding/putting knowledge into practice: Through development of resident-centered care planning, and -Resisting re-traumatization: Through avoiding identified triggers and making empathetic, reasonable modifications to the care approach and environment. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with diagnoses including Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder. Resident 39's 7/25/22 Social Services Assessment revealed the resident was not assessed for her/his diagnosis of PTSD. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately supervised while smoking for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#106) reviewed for smoking safety. This placed residents at risk for injury from fire hazards. Findings include: The facility's Smoking Policy, revised 10/2023 stated residents who wished to smoke were evaluated for their ability to smoke safely. Residents who did not meet the safety criteria established by the facility to smoke independently were aided or supervised by facility staff during smoking activities. Resident 106 admitted to the facility in 2016, with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and stroke. Resident 106's MDS Quarterly dated 7/11/24 revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 106's Smoking Safety Evaluation dated 8/14/24 revealed Resident 106 did not have adequate cognitive skills or memory recall, did not recognize designated smoking areas and could not identify proper smoking receptacles. The IDT decision stated observations [of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 2 sampled residents (# 106) reviewed for misappropriation. This placed residents at risk for loss of property. Findings include: Resident 106 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and heart failure. Resident 106's MDS Quarterly dated 5/7/24 revealed she/he was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The facility submitted a report to the state agency on 5/30/23 which stated Resident 106 had loaned Staff 4 (Former CNA) money and the facility started an investigation which included suspending Staff 4. On 5/30/24 at 12:48 PM, Resident 106 confirmed she/he loaned Staff 4 money on several occasions prior to May 2023 and Staff 4 had paid back the money. Resident 106 stated in May 2023 she/he loaned Staff 4 $700.00 for new tires and was not paid back. Staff 4 was unable to be interviewed due to no longer working at the facility. On 6/6/24 at 11:00 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene while preparing and serving food for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: On 7/27/23 at 11:39 AM during the kitchen inspection, Staff 14 (Dietary Aid) was observed touching a kitchen door and handle. The door was white in color with numerous dark brown markings on front and back. Afterwards Staff 14 resumed preparing trays. Staff 14 did not change his gloves and perform hand hygiene. On 7/28/23 between 11:31 AM and 12:08 PM Staff 14 was observed with gloved hands touching a white kitchen door with numerous dark brown markings on front and back, cart handles, refrigerator handles, his clothing, facemask and silverware during lunch food service without changing his gloves and performing hand hygiene. On 7/28/23 between 11:31 AM and 11:50 AM Staff 13 (Cook) and Staff 14 were wearing facemasks pulled down below their noses. Staff 13 and Staff 14 touched their facemasks to adjust them with their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment on 4 of 4 resident halls and 1 of 1 resident outside courtyard patio reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for tripping and living in an unkept and unhomelike environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's outside resident courtyard patio and resident rooms from 7/25/23 through 7/28/23 found the following issues: -Numerous deep cracks, lifted and uneven cement surfaces and areas of missing cement were observed on the resident courtyard patio which posed a tripping hazard. Multiple residents were observed utilizing the outside courtyard patio on a frequent basis. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hole in the wall, chipped paint on the walls, the flooring in front of the window was cracked and non-skid strips in front of the toilet were lifted and peeling which were a tripping hazard. Urine was observed on the far wall to the left of the toilet, a wash cloth with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mood disorder) and anxiety disorder. The 6/12/23 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 18 was cognitively intact and was not exhibiting behaviors at that time. A closed care plan from a prior admission to the facility dated 5/11/22 indicated Resident 18 had a history of expressing suicidal ideations in an attempt to be admitted to the hospital. The closed care plan also included extensive resident centered interventions for identified behaviors. Resident 18's current care plan reviewed on 7/30/23 did not include a history of expressing suicidal ideations identified on the 5/11/22 closed care plan, specific behaviors, nor interventions to manage these behaviors. Resident 18's [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including diabetes and chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. 1. A 6/13/23 and revised 7/10/23 physician order indicated Resident 4 was prescribed lispro insulin (a rapid acting insulin that lowers blood glucose) before meals. A review of Resident 4's 7/1/23 through 7/26/23 DAR (diabetic administration record) indicated the resident's lispro insulin was not administered according to physician orders on the following days: -7/4 lunch dose missed; -7/6 lunch dose missed; -7/8 lunch dose missed; -7/11 lunch dose missed; -7/15 lunch dose missed; -7/18 lunch dose missed; -7/20 lunch dose missed; -7/22 lunch dose missed; -7/23 lunch dose missed. On 7/27/23 at 11:07 AM Staff 7 (RNCM) reviewed Resident 4's lispro insulin DAR and stated the resident's lispro insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess and provide or offer pressure ulcer wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#117) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers or delayed healing. Findings include: Resident 117 was readmitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including malnutrition. On 12/13/22 at 10:47 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 117 reported the facility should have done more to prevent the resident's pressure ulcers from worsening. Resident 117's Progress Notes from 8/1/22 through 12/12/22 revealed extensive documentation of the resident's refusals of care including pressure ulcer treatment and pressure off-loading. The notes also included frequent education provided to the resident regarding the risks of refusing treatments and off-loading. Resident 117's 9/2022 TAR revealed the resident had wound treatments ordered for pressure ulcers to the left and right buttocks three times per week. The TAR indicated wound care was completed three times out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure smoking care plan interventions were followed and smoking materials were stored in a safe manner for 3 of 3 residents (#s 11, 14 and 33) reviewed for smoking. This placed residents at risk for burns and smoking related accidents. Findings include: The facility's Smoking Policy and Procedure for Independent smokers, last revised 3/2020, indicated the following: -The smoking policy was communicated to the resident prior to or upon admission to the center. -Residents who were safe to smoke independently and safely manage their smoking materials were allowed to do so in a manner that was safe according to the assessment. -Residents who did not adhere to smoking policies were subject to additional interventions and safety measures, including but not limited to, revocation of their ability to smoke while a resident at the center and discharge from the center. 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including COPD (a lung disease causing breathing problems) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions (GDRs) were attempted for residents on psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (mood disorder) and anxiety disorder. The 6/12/23 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 18 was cognitively intact. Resident 18's current active physician orders indicated the following: - Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 20mg by mouth at bedtime. Order last updated 10/17/22 - Invega (antipsychotic) 3mg extended release one time a day. Order last updated 10/17/22 - Sertraline (antidepressant) 150mg one time a day. Order last updated 9/3/2022 A review of Resident 18's clinical record from 9/2022 through 7/2023 revealed no documentation to support or rationalize gradual dose reductions not being attempted. On 7/31/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 7 (RNCM), Staff 9 (LPN), Staff 10 (RNCM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/10/2024
PACS GROUP, INC.OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/10/2024
PACS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/10/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/10/2024
MURRAY, JASONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
CEESAY, ANSUMANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
GRACE, VICTORIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/21/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
LARSON, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
PROVIDENCE GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 3%Other / private 20%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$508per resident / day
operating cost
$15,429per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$534per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385044. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next