No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Porthaven Post Acute

5330 NE Prescott Street, Portland, OR 97218 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (503) 288-6585 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$43,788 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $43,788 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6633 NE Sandy Blvd
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.4 mi
4346 NE Cully Blvd · (503) 288-0836 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5850 NE Prescott St · (503) 284-7268 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4936 NE Skidmore St · (503) 284-6697

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.6%20.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%12.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.4%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.3%13.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.3%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.4%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.2%21.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%16.1%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 36.7–61.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.8–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.4–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.44
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
43.6%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.44 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-08)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for the prevention of sexual abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, placed residents at risk for sexual abuse when staff witnessed repeated nonconsensual sexual activity without putting interventions in place. Findings include: A 1/2023 facility abuse policy indicated the following. - A thorough investigation is completed through a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or series of events. It seeks to determine if abuse occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences. - Sexual abuse is defined as sexual contact where the resident has no ability to consent. - Residents with sexual behaviors are assessed to determine their ability to give informed consent related to sexual acts. - Staff with knowledge of inappropriate sexual comments or contact between residents are to report immediately to the facility administration. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident (#2) reviewed for physical abuse. This resulted in physical injury and prolonged pain which required increased pharmaceutical interventions. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including multiple spinal fractures and mild cognitive impairment. The 1/9/25 Quarterly MDS, revealed Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with mobility. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including restlessness and agitation. A 8/13/24 Quarterly MDS, revealed Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with mobility. An email communication record from 11/30/23 from Staff 19 (Prior Interim DNS) reported Resident 1 was a very violent person with behaviors and provided contact information for Resident 1's probation officer. A review of Resident 1's clinical record including her/his care plan revealed no information regarding her/his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided supervision and positioning assistance with eating and follow a resident's care plan related to bed mobility and bathing for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 11) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in Resident 5 aspirating while eating without supervision and positioning assistance. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including difficulty swallowing following a stroke and respiratory failure. Resident 5's Care Plan initiated on 7/11/23 indicated the resident required one-on-one staff supervision while eating. A Progress Note dated 7/23/23 indicated Resident 5's breakfast tray was left at the resident's bedside without the head of the bed elevated. The resident ate breakfast without staff assistance, began coughing and displayed signs and symptoms of aspiration (when food enters the lungs or airway by accident). The nurse assisted the resident with deep breathing and appeared to clear the obstruction. The resident's lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly respond to grievances and complaints from the resident council for three of four months reviewed. This placed residents at risk for a lack of resolution to voiced concerns. Findings include:An undated facility Resident Council Policy indicated the following:-A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. -The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee will review information and feedback from the Resident Council as part of their quality review. -Issues documented on council response forms may be referred to the QAPI Committee, if applicable (i.e., the issue is of serious nature or if there is a pattern, etc.). A review of the 1/2025 through 11/2025 grievance book revealed that there were no grievances submitted by the Resident Council. A review of the Resident Council Minutes from 8/2025 through 11/2025 revealed multiple concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment toilet/shower rooms for 3 of 4 communal resident bathrooms reviewed for homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for unsanitary conditions while using the communal toilet/shower rooms. Findings include:The facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection Environment Surfaces, adopted on 8/1/24 indicated the following: Policy: Environmental surfaces are cleaned and disinfected according to CDC recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. A one-step process and an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant designed for housekeeping purposes is used in resident care areas where: a. uncertainty exists about the nature of the soil on the surfaces (e.g., blood or body fluid contamination versus routine dust or dirt) or b. uncertainty exists about the presence of multi-drug-resistant organisms on such surfaces.Resident 11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered activity program for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#42) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings include:The facility's 6/2018 Activity Programs Policy indicated activities offered were based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident and documented in the resident's medical record. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including dementia.Resident 42's 10/29/25 admission MDS revealed the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and listening to preferred music was a very important activity to the resident. The Activities CAA indicated an activity care plan would be created and updated as needed. Resident 42's Activity Task Records from 11/9/25 to 12/8/25 revealed the resident did not participate in any music-themed activities. A review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed no activity care plan was developed for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 6 residents (#14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for decreased weight loss. Findings include:Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including an open wound on her/his right foot and morbid obesity.Resident 14's 10/12/25 admission MDS revealed she/he had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent for bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene.Signed physician orders dated 10/14/25 revealed Resident 14 was to receive 0.5ML of Tirzepatide injected subcutaneously every seven days for diabetes mellitus and weight management.A review of Resident 14's medication administration records revealed she/he did not receive an injection of Tirzepatide as ordered on the following days:-11/19/25-11/26/25-12/3/25A progress note created on 11/19/25 revealed Resident 14 was given her/his final weekly dose and a new order was placed for her/his next dose.On 12/3/25 at 9:57 AM Resident 14 stated, she/he started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decreases in range of motion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscle, tendons and skin causing the joint to shorten and stiffen) and conditions. Findings include: The facility's 7/2017 Resident Mobility and ROM Policy indicated the following:-Residents with limited ROM received treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM.-As part of the comprehensive assessment, the nurse identified conditions that placed the resident at risk for complications related to ROM and mobility, including contractures. -The care plan would be developed based on the comprehensive assessment and revised as needed. -The care plan would include specific interventions, exercises and therapies to maintain, prevent avoidable decline in, and/or improve mobility and ROM. -Interventions included therapies, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and smoking materials were properly secured for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#73) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include:The facility's 9/2024 Smoking Policy indicated the following:-Residents who do not meet the established criteria to smoke independently are aided/supervised during smoking activities. -Residents are not allowed to borrow cigarettes or other smoking materials from other residents. -All smoking materials are locked up, including smoking materials for residents who are assessed to be a supervised smoker. Resident 73 was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage (brain bleed). Resident 73's 11/26/25 admission MDS revealed the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and did not use tobacco. Resident 73's 12/1/25 Smoking Assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, smoked cigarettes, could not light her/his own smoking device and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and records review it was determined the facility failed to practice proper food safety techniques for 1 of 4 (#5) residents reviewed for food. The placed residents at risk for consumption of contaminated food. Findings include:The Center for Disease Control 11/24/25 Food Safety guidelines include the following information:Bacteria can multiply rapidly if food is left at room temperature or in the Danger Zone between 40 degrees F and 140 degrees F.Never leave perishable food (meat, dairy, and cut fruit) out for more than two hours.Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder).A Care Plan updated 8/25/25 included interventions for room cleaning including asking resident if room could be cleaned and ensuring safe/sanitation in the room.Review of records revealed no specific information of education provided to Resident 5 on risks of having meals kept in her/his room for extended periods or alternate techniques attempted to ensure Resident 5's safety with food while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge from the facility for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge. Findings include:Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility in 2/2025, for congestive heart failure and delusional disorders.On 8/4/25 at 2:40 PM and 8/5/2025 at 4:01 PM, Witness 1 (Primary Physician) stated Resident 5 was discharged unsafely to the resident's family home, which had no running water, rats, and no heat in the winter. Witness 1 further stated the facility had never included them in any discharge planning nor had the facility informed them that Resident 5 was discharged . On 8/6/2025 at 4:20 PM, Witness 2 (former Social Services Director) stated Resident 5 was really discouraged from returning to his/her family home due to unsafe situations, including a rat infestation, no running water, and no electricity.Resident 5's clinical records indicated an IDT meeting was held on 11/17/2024, which stated it was unsafe to discharge Resident 5.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately document wound assessments and dressing change refusals for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 3) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records and risk for injury and/or decreased ability for recovery. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including acute and subacute infective endocarditis (infection). An undated facility policy pertaining to documentation indicated the following: - all nursing staff must document resident assessments. - Documentation should be timely, complete and entered in the appropriate PCC module. - Refusals of care are to be documented in the progress notes including interventions used, resident response, and any notifications made. Resident 3 had the following weekly wound assessments documented in her/his medical record: 1/20/25, 1/24/25, 1/30/25, 2/6/25, 2/13/25, 2/20/25, 2/27/25, 3/6/25, 3/7/25, 3/20/25, and 4/7/25. There was no documented assessments found between 3/20/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 3 residents (# 2) sampled reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including open wound to left foot. A 3/20/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 2 was cognitively intact. On 4/8/25 at 10:00 AM, during an observation of a chronic wound dressing change, an unidentified female placed an enhanced barrier precaution sign on the door to Resident 2's room. Staff 6 (RN) and Staff 5 (LPN/Care Manager) were observed to then put appropriate PPE on and continue Resident 2's dressing change. There was no documentation found in Resident 2's clinical record indicating she/he had been placed on enhanced barrier precautions for a chronic wound. On 4/8/25 at 10:56 AM, Staff 6 confirmed he had not worn appropriate PPE (gown) when he provided care to Resident 2. On 4/8/25 at 10:59 AM, Resident 2 stated she/he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for sexual abuse. This placed residents at risk for psychological harm. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy, revised 1/2023, stated the facility and staff would protect residents from all types of abuse. The facility's Resident Sexual Consent policy dated 9/2022, stated a resident's consent to engage in sexual activity is not valid if a resident lacks the capacity to consent. Any forced sexual activity with a resident is considered sexual abuse. Resident 10 admitted to the facility 7/2024, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Resident 10's 8/2024 MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 10 was discharged home on 8/28/24. Resident 11 admitted to the facility 5/2024, with diagnoses including Factor X chromosome (a genetic disorder causing developmental and intellectual disability). Resident 11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 2 of 4 halls (East and Annex Halls), 1 of 1 dining room, and 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 28 and 37) reviewed for dining and skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include: 1. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, section titled Infection Prevention during Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration specified there was an increased risk for exposure to bloodborne viruses through contaminated equipment, such as glucometers, when shared. Using a [glucometer] for more than one person without cleaning and disinfecting it in between uses contributed to transmission of HBV (Hepatitis B virus). [Glucometers] should be cleaned and disinfected after every use. The facility's 4/2019 Disinfection of Point-of-Care Devices/Instrument Policy & Procedure specified all point-of-care devices, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 3 of 4 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 8/12/24 through 8/16/24 identified the following issues: -A light cover on the annex hall near room [ROOM NUMBER] was cracked with missing chunks of the lighting cover. -One hall light was out on the annex hall near room [ROOM NUMBER]. -Two lights were out in the dining room. -Dirty vent covers in rooms 155, 157, 158, the center hall outside the employee room and outside the RCM office near the west hall. -The east hall near the O2 storage closet had a torn/jagged baseboard to the left of the closet door. -The east hall near the emergency exit had broken pieces of plastic on both wall corners approximately 3 inches in length that were sharp/jagged. -A lower corner wall near the west hall and RCM office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to involve residents/representatives in the care planning process for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 4 and 41) reviewed for care planning and dementia. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 5/2009 with diagnoses including dementia. A review of Resident 4's medical record revealed the last care conference completed for Resident 4 was on 2/5/24. On 8/15/24 at 10:12 AM Staff 11 (SSD) stated Resident 4 had not had a care conference completed since 2/5/24. On 8/15/24 at 12:54 AM Staff 6 (LPN Resident Care Manager) and Staff 4 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated care plan revisions and reviews are reviewed with the resident and/or representatives on a quarterly basis during the care conference. Staff 6 stated Resident 4 was overdue for a care conference. 2. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure. A 6/15/24 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 41 had moderate cognitive decline. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up on grievances for 1 of 1 resident (#309) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 309 was admitted to the facility in 6/2020 with diagnoses including depression. On 7/8/24 a public complaint was received with allegations of missing personal property. On 8/12/24 at 5:25 PM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 309 was discharged from the facility in 4/2024 and was missing some personal belongings. Witness 1 stated she informed the facility via phone of the missing items but had not received a reply from the facility. On 8/13/24 at 9:41 AM Staff 4 (SSD) stated she never received a complaint or grievance related to missing personal items from Resident 309 or her/his representatives. An 8/14/24 review of the facility grievance binder revealed no evidence of a grievance from Resident 309 or her/his representatives. On 8/14/24 at 11:20 AM Staff 4 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated she was Resident 309's care manager but had not received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalizations for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 56) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy by the Ombudsman's office. Findings include: Resident 56 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and bacteremia (bacteria in blood). Resident 56's 5/23/24 Discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute care hospital. A review of Resident 56's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the state/local Ombudsman was notified Resident 56 was discharged to a hospital. On 8/15/24 at 12:51 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of discharged residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 3 residents (#s 4 and 56 ) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 5/2009 with diagnoses including epilepsy and dementia. A 1/31/24 Progress Note revealed Resident 4 experienced a change in condition which required increased medical attention and she/he was transferred to a hospital. A review of Resident 4's health record revealed no documentation to indicate a copy of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to Resident 4 when she/he experienced a change in condition and was transferred to a hospital. On 8/15/24 at 1:24 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed a bed hold policy was not provided to Resident 4 when she/he experienced a change in condition and was required to be transferred to a hospital. On 8/16/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess residents for oxygen therapy and wounds for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 22 and 37) reviewed for respiratory care and skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including heart attack and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe). Resident 22's 12/17/24 through 6/11/24 Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive supplemental oxygen therapy at 2 LPM (liters per minute) per NC (nasal cannula-a non-invasive medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to resident's through their noses) for signs of cyanosis (bluish or purple discoloration of the skin, lips and nail beds caused by lack of oxygen), symptoms of dyspnea (difficulty breathing) or shortness of breath. Resident 22's 6/11/24 through 7/30/24 Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive supplemental oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 22 and 28) reviewed for respiratory care and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including heart attack and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe). Resident 22's 7/30/24 Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive supplemental oxygen therapy at 2 to 4 LPM (liters per minute) continuously per NC (nasal cannula-a non-invasive medical device that provides supplemental oxygen through the nose). Resident 22's 5/14/24 (most current) Care Plan indicated the resident was to receive oxygen per NC at 2 LPM as needed to maintain oxygen saturation levels (a measurement of how well the lungs are working) between 88% and 92%. Observations from 8/12/24 through 8/16/24 between the hours of 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provided nail care services to 1 of 1 resident (# 24) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with diagnoses including a stroke resulting in hemiplegia (partial or complete loss of function of one side of the body). Physician orders from 7/11/22 stated a licensed nurse was to check fingernails and toe nails once a week and trim as needed. A 6/5/24 Care Plan included Resident 24 requiring extensive assistance with ADL tasks including hygiene and grooming. Review of LN Care Records from 6/2024 through 8/2024 revealed nail care was marked as not needed on the following dates: - 6/3/24, - 6/24/24, - 7/1/24, - 7/8/24, - 7/15/24, - 7/22/24, - 7/29/24, - 8/5/24 and - 8/12/24. Review of LN Care Records from 6/2024 revealed Resident 24 refused nail trimming on the following dates: - 6/10/24 and - 6/17/24. On 8/13/24 at 12:35 PM Resident 24 stated her/his nails were too long, nail care had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to start antibiotic treatment timely or follow physician orders for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#s 4 and 28) reviewed for skin condition and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Finding include: 1. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes with a foot ulcer and cellulitis (a bacterial skin infection) of the left lower limb. a. Resident 28's 5/20/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had a total of two venous ulcers (leg ulcers caused by problems with blood flow in a person's leg veins) and arterial ulcers (a painful, deep sore or wound in the skin of the lower leg or foot) and received the application of nonsurgical dressings and ointments/medications other than to her/his feet. A 6/26/24 Progress Note indicated Resident 28 was observed to have three large greenish patches on her/his right lower extremity with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure necessary interventions were in place and followed to reduce the risk of falls and to thoroughly investigate the cause of a fall for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 37 and 360) reviewed for skin conditions and falls. This placed residents at risk for falls. Findings include: 1. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes, acquired absence of left foot, acquired absence of right toes and peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). Resident 37's 7/9/23 Morse Fall Scale indicated the resident was at high risk to fall. Resident 37's 3/7/24 At Risk For Falls Care Plan revealed the following: -The resident experienced impaired physical mobility as a result of the surgical amputation of her/his left foot. -The resident had a history of falls. -The resident's call light/personal items were to be within reach. -The resident was to wear nonskid footwear when transferring. -Staff were to remind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide correct humidity administration for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for improper humidity administration. Findings include: A Respiratory Treatment Policy and Procedure dated 6/22/22 stated: It is the policy of this center that residents receive respiratory treatments and monitoring per their physician orders, standards of practice and care plan. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including respiratory failure which included a tracheostomy required to breathe and malnutrition. A 3/13/24 physician order for Resident 17 revealed the resident used humidity mist via her/his tracheostomy with a flow rate of eight liters per minute at all times. The 6/13/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 17 was severely cognitively impaired. On 8/15/24 at 8:50 AM Staff 19 (LPN) observed Resident 17's humidity mist and confirmed it was set at four liters per minute. On 8/15/24 at 10:57 AM Staff 3 (Interim…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to employ a Physical Therapist to provide therapy services to 1 of 1 resident (# 209) reviewed for therapy services. This placed residents at risk of a decline in function and/or a delayed recovery. Findings include: Resident 209 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple left toe fractures. Hospital orders from 8/6/24 included instructions for Resident 209 to receive a PT evaluation and services. Review of therapy records on from 8/6/24 to 8/13/24 revealed Resident 209 had not been evaluated by PT and therefore had not received PT services to assist with her/his transfer safety and mobility. On 8/14/24 at 2:50 PM Staff 20 (Rehabilitation Director) stated the facility had not been able to have a consistent physical therapist who performed evaluations or provided therapy services. Staff 20 stated the frequency and duration of therapy services had to be reduced for all residents due to insufficient therapy staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a plan in place to coordinate care and document hospice services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#359) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for lack of coordination of care. Findings include: Resident 359 admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including failure to thrive and acute kidney failure. Resident's 359's health record indicated the resident was admitted to hospice services on 8/6/24. There was no further documentation including contact information, physican's orders for hospice services, hospice care plan or hospice notes. On 8/13/24 at 2:01 PM Staff 11 (Social Services Director) stated resident 359 began hospice services on 8/6/24 and Staff 11 did not know when they came in to care for the resident. On 8/14/24 at 10:00 AM Staff 23 (CNA) stated she thought the resident received hospice services, but had not seen any hospice providers and had no communication with any hospice staff. On 8/15/24 at 10:17 AM Staff 5 (RNCM) acknowledged there was no hospice documentation in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff available to meet resident care needs in a timely manner for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing and call light response times. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet needs and lengthy call light response times. Findings include: On 5/9/24 the facility had a census of 63 residents. On 5/13/24, Staff 2 (DNS) provided a list of residents who: -Required two-person mechanical lift transfers: 12 -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for bathing: 58 -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for toileting: 22 -Required one or two-person extensive or total assistance for dressing: 39 -Required suctioning due to a tracheostomy (an opening into the trachea from the outside due to obstructed breathing): 2 -Required tube feedings: 4 -Had behavioral healthcare needs: 8 Observations from 5/9/24 through 5/13/24 from the hours of 8:15 AM to 1:30 PM revealed the following concerns:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility's quality assessment and performance improvement committee (QAPI) failed to systematically identify and correct deficiencies in the areas of reporting abuse, safe discharge and accident prevention. This placed residents at risk of abuse, accidents and injuries. Findings include: The facility's 1/4/2024 complaint survey identified the following: 1. The facility failed to report allegations of abuse timely. This deficient practice was also identified on the 2/2024 revisit survey. During an interview on 2/28/24 at 4:22 PM and 2/29/24 at 11:16 AM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (Interim DNS) and Staff 3 (Regional RN) acknowledged the QAPI system the facility had in place was not effective. Staff 3 shared audits she completed which did not systematically address the identified residents and areas the QAPI committee was to address in the facility's plan of correction. Additional information provided by the facility on 2/29/24 and 3/1/24 failed to demonstrate a root cause analysis, systems to identify, report, track,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 12/2019 with diagnoses including stroke and dementia. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A facility incident report dated 4/30/23 indicated at approximately 9:45 AM Resident 1 (who was on one-to-one staff supervision due to behavioral issues.) and Resident 2 started arguing with each other during a smoking break. Resident 2 told Resident 1 to shut up and used a racial slur. On 12/21/23 at 1:09 PM Staff 3 (CNA) stated on 4/30/23 she was assigned to monitor Resident 1 related to her/his behavior issues. Staff 3 stated while out in the smoking area Resident 1 was talking a lot and Resident 2 told Resident 1 to shut the [profanity] up. The argument escalated with the residents verbally and physically threatening each other and Resident 1 told Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 6 and 7) reviewed for abuse reporting. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 6/2020 with diagnoses including seizures and anxiety. A facility incident report dated 7/21/23 indicated on 7/21/23 an unnamed CNA reported Resident 6 was found wet, with a garbage bag underneath her/him during morning cares on 7/19/23. A Nursing Facility Reported Incident Form dated 7/21/23 indicated the incident was reported to the Sate Agency on 7/21/23. On 12/28/23 at 9:45 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the incident was not reported to the State Agency in a timely manner. 2. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including obesity and anxiety. A facility incident report dated 7/26/23 indicated on 7/24/23 an unnamed CNA reported another unnamed CNA threw a gown at Resident 7. A Nursing Facility Reported Incident Form dated 7/26/23 indicated the incident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for accidents and lack of ADL care. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including neck surgery and foot fracture. Resident 13's SNF Utilization Review Skilled dated 11/7/23 indicated the resident had upper body weakness, needed assistance with eating and the resident's upper body (strength and mobility) did not improve. The resident needed maximum assistance with dressing, toileting and bathing. The discharge plan indicated the resident still needed to work on upper body strength. Resident 13's Discharge Summary/Plan of Care dated 12/4/23 indicated the resident was discharging to her/his private residence and home health services would be arranged. Resident 13's Progress Notes dated 12/4/23 indicated the resident was discharged to her/his home with home health services set up. On 12/27/23 at 3:00 PM Witness 5 (Complainant) stated Resident 13 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided ADL care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes and anxiety. An undated facility Event Summary indicated overnight between 6/23/23 and 6/24/23 Resident 4 reported she/he was left in her/his wheelchair all night. Staff 4 (CNA) who was assigned to Resident 4 during the night shift stated she was not aware the resident was in her/his wheelchair all night. Staff 4 was terminated for neglect of Resident 4. On 12/27/23 at 10:34 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the incident occurred according to the Event Summary.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs in a timely manner for 4 of 6 residents (#s 6, 14, 18 and 25) reviewed for staffing concerns. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including a knee fracture and obesity. Resident 6's 3/10/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 6's 12/1/22 Self Care Performance ADL Care Plan indicated the resident required extensive assistance with one to two person assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, transfers and personal hygiene. Resident 6's 4/18/23 through 5/2/23 iAlert (call light tracking records) indicated the following delayed response times: Call light times between 20 minutes and 30 minutes: 17 Call light times between 31 minutes and 45 minutes: 7 Call light times between 46 minutes and one hour: 8 Call light times over one hour: 3 Resident 6's call light times were delayed 26% of the time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide written information to residents concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1, 44 and 99) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care decisions honored. Findings include: Records reviewed for Residents 1, 44 and 99 revealed no documentation of an advance directive or documentation to indicate the residents were informed of or provided written information concerning their right to formulate an advance directive. On 5/3/23 at 10:02 AM Staff 19 (Regional Director of Operations) stated advance directives were typically sent with the resident from the hospital and placed in their medical record. Staff 19 stated it was his expectation staff asked for advance directives prior to admission and offered one within the first 72 hours of admission. On 5/3/23 at 11:32 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she had not educated social services on going over advance directives prior to admission or offering one within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 102 and 103) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including influenza and heart attack. Resident 102's Clinical Census (reviewed on 5/5/23) indicated the resident's last covered day of Medicare Part A services (skilled services including therapy) was 1/21/23. On 5/4/23 at 9:26 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked to provide documentation demonstrating Resident 102 was provided a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) which notified the resident of skilled services ending and their rights of appeal. On 5/4/23 at 11:20 Staff 19 (Regional Director of Operations) stated Resident 102 was not provided with a NOMNC prior to discharge, but a notice should have been provided. 2. Resident 103 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#248) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including dementia with behavior disturbance. Resident 21's 3/16/22 Care Plan included monitoring for behaviors including verbal and physical aggression. Resident 248 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. Resident 248's 2/2023 cognitive assessment concluded normal cognitive function. Review of a 3/6/23 Facility Incident Report indicated Resident 21 was attempting to get hot chocolate from the kitchen and was asked to wait. Resident 21 observed Resident 248 laughing with staff members and assumed Resident 248 was laughing at her/him. Resident 21 approached and verbally threatened to strike Resident 248. Staff 13 (CNA) intervened and removed Resident 248 from the altercation. A Progress Note dated 3/7/23 at 8:35 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review is was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan reflected the needs of the resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#99) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for pain and injury. Findings include: Resident 99 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including paralysis and [NAME]-Danlos syndrome (a disorder which can cause overly flexible joints which can cause pain and dislocations). A review of Resident 99's Care Plan initiated on 4/19/23 revealed no instructions for staff to handle the resident carefully to prevent joint pain or dislocation. On 5/2/23 at 9:29 AM Resident 99 stated during care staff caused a subluxation (partial dislocation) of her/his left shoulder which caused severe pain. A 4/25/23 incident investigation indicated while Resident 99 was being turned in bed, the resident's arm dropped and caused pain to the resident's left shoulder. The investigation concluded the resident's disease process caused the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bed baths for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 6 and 99) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of hygiene. Findings include: 1. Resident 99 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including paralysis. On 5/2/23 at 9:31 AM Resident 99 stated she/he had not received a bed bath since she/he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] because the facility had to order hypoallergenic soap. Resident 99's bathing record from 4/20/23 through 5/1/23 indicated the resident received bed baths on 4/24/23, 4/27/23 and 4/29/23. On 5/3/23 at 11:36 AM Staff 13 (CNA) confirmed Resident 99 was not receiving bed baths because the facility did not have the special soap for Resident 99 and were just wiping the resident down with water. On 5/3/23 at 12:19 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she ordered the special soap for Resident 99 and it was delivered the last week of 4/2023. The soap was called Vanicream. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 23 and 43) reviewed for unnecessary medications and amputation healing. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences and inadequate amputation healing. Findings include: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with diagnoses including heart failure, high blood pressure and arteriosclerotic heart disease (thickening and hardening of the heart arteries). A 10/31/22 physician order indicated Resident 23 was prescribed clonidine transdermal patch for hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (heart damage due to chronic high blood pressure), to be applied every Monday and the old patch removed. A review of Resident 23's 4/2023 MAR indicated the clonidine patch was not applied and the old patch was not removed on Monday, 4/10/23. A review of Resident 23's 4/2023 Progress Notes revealed no documentation regarding the resident's missed clonidine patch and no evidence Resident 23's medical provider was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary services for pressure ulcer care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2019 and was diagnosed with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) on her/his coccyx (tailbone) in 1/2022. Resident 7's 1/2023 Care Plan included instructions for pressure ulcer healing for her/his coccyx including repositioning Resident 7 at least every two hours. On 5/1/23 at 2:52 PM Resident 7 said, [she/he] would be lying if [she/he] said I was repositioned every two hours. On 5/2/23 at 10:21 AM Resident 7 stated she/he had not been repositioned since she/he had received breakfast around 8:00 AM that morning. Observations of Resident 7 were made on 5/3/23 from 10:15 AM through 12:27 PM. No positioning change assistance was provided during the observation period. At 12:27 PM, Resident 7 stated she/he had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide foot care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for increased foot problems. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses including a knee fracture and obesity. Resident 6's 3/10/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with one person physical assistance for personal hygiene. On 5/1/23 at 3:38 PM and 5/3/23 at 8:58 AM Resident 6 was observed with long, yellow and very thick toenails on both feet. Resident 6 stated her/his toenails were starting to get long before she/he was admitted to the facility and the toenails grew a lot since her/his admission. Resident 6 stated she/he asked a nurse to trim her/his toenails a long time ago but they said they did not have the right type of clippers. Resident 6 stated nothing had been done about her/his long toenails. A review of Resident 6's health record did not include evidence the resident received toenail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide brace/splint devices to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 14 and 27) reviewed for ROM. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including stroke and left sided flaccid hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of motor function on one side of the body). Resident 14's 1/26/23 Annual MDS indicated the resident had upper and lower extremity impairment on one side and there were 0 days with brace/splint assistance. Resident 14's current Care Plan instructed staff to apply the resident's brace twice daily for four hours and remove for four hours in between. Resident 14's 4/1/23 through 4/30/23 Brace Donning log indicated the following: -Staff documented Resident 14 wore her/his brace for 3-15 minutes on 11 days. -Staff documented Resident 14 refused her/his brace on 13 days. -Staff documented not applicable on 15 days. Observations on 5/1/23 at 11:45 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' environment was free from hazards for 1 of 1 facilities randomly observed. This placed residents at risk for injury and blood borne infection. Findings include: a. A random observation on 5/1/23 at 11:14 AM revealed several unused syringes on top of a medication cart by room [ROOM NUMBER]. The syringes were unsecured and unmonitored by staff. On 5/1/23 at 11:18 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) verified the syringes were unsecured. b. A random observation on 5/2/23 at 9:21 AM revealed a large sharps container on a cart by room [ROOM NUMBER]. The sharps container did not have a lid on the top and numerous used sharps and syringes were in the container. The container was not being monitored by staff. On 5/2/23 at 10:29 AM Staff 20 (former Administrator) verified the sharps container did not have a lid and had used sharps including syringes. 2. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct post dialysis assessments of resident's condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for potential unmet care needs upon return from dialysis. Findings include: Resident 31 was re-admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnosis including end stage renal disease and diabetes with other diabetic kidney complications. Resident 31's Care Plan identified she/he needed dialysis due to end stage renal disease, which was scheduled every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Interventions included to monitor and report any problems with the resident's access site to the physician or dialysis nurse. The facility's Dialysis Transfer Form included a Post Dialysis Nursing Assessment to be completed by the facility upon the residents return from dialysis. The Post Dialysis Nursing Assessment included the following sections: Lung sounds, access site, bruit, thrill, signs/symptoms of post dialysis complications, temperature, pulse, rate, BP and did the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 43 and 99) reviewed for bathing and skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and improper amputation healing. Findings include: 1. Resident 99 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including paralysis. On 5/2/23 at 9:31 AM Resident 99 stated she/he had not received a bed bath since she/he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] because the facility had to order hypoallergenic soap. Resident 99's bathing record from 4/20/23 through 5/1/23 indicated the resident received bed baths on 4/24/23, 4/27/23 and 4/29/23. On 5/3/23 at 11:36 AM Staff 13 (CNA) confirmed Resident 99 was not receiving bed baths because they did not have the special soap for Resident 99 and were just wiping the resident down with water. Refer to F677 example 1. 2. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a left leg above the knee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain respiratory care equipment in a sanitary manner and perform wound care in a sterile manner for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 29 and 99) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for infection. Findings include: 1. Resident 99 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including paralysis. A physician order dated 4/20/23 indicated staff were to change Resident 99's disposable inner cannula (The smaller inner tube which inserted into the larger outer tube of a tracheostomy (an independent airway created by a surgical incision in the neck into the windpipe)) every day. Resident 99's 5/2023 TAR included replacement of the inner cannula and tracheostomy care every day and PRN. On 5/3/23 at 9:42 AM Staff 17 (RN) was observed as she performed tracheostomy care for Resident 99. Resident 99 had a vertical tracheotomy (the incision which created the tracheostomy) which extended slightly below the outer cannula and a bandage was in place over the incision. Staff 17 obtained a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were functional for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#27) reviewed for call light functioning concerns. This placed residents at risk for delayed assistance. Findings include: Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including a stroke. On 5/1/23 at 3:00 PM, 5/2/23 at 8:30 AM and 9:29 AM and 5/3/23 at 8:19 AM Resident 27 turned on her/his call light which was observed to not be activated on the call light monitors located in the hallways and at the nursing station. On 5/1/23 at 3:00 PM Resident 27 stated her/his call light did not work and had not been working for a while. On 5/3/23 at 8:20 AM Resident 27 turned on her/his call light and Staff 11 (CNA) confirmed the resident's call light did not activate. Staff 11 pulled the call light cord from the device and re-inserted it and the call light still did not activate. On 5/3/23 at 10:40 AM Staff 16 (Maintenance Director) confirmed Resident 27's call light was not working. Staff 16 stated he completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$43,788 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $10,166 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-01-04
  • $25,604 — penalty dated 2024-01-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
MORRIS, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WARR, BRANDONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
WELCH, EZEKIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2024
LTC PROPERTIES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 8%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$576per resident / day
operating cost
$17,519per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$583per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385045. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next