No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bedford Post Acute

136 Donahoe Manor Road, Bedford, PA 15522 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (814) 623-9075 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 623-9075 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jul 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
644 E Penn St · (814) 623-1973 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8772 Lincoln Hwy · (814) 623-6721 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Fort Bedford Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.8%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.4%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.9%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.6%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%9.5%12.0%typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.0%CMS range 40.6–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 8.4–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.3–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.00
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.62
RN hoursweekends
36.1%
Total nursing turnover
27.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 63.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-17)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the ombudsman (an independent, impartial official appointed to investigate and help resolve complaints) of a transfer to the hospital for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 6, 9, 65 and 75). Findings include: A facility policy regarding transfer or discharge notices, dated January 7, 2026, indicated that residents (or resident representatives) are notified of an impending transfer or discharge and the reason for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. A copy of the notice is sent to the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. When a resident is sent emergently to an acute care setting, this is considered a transfer, not discharge, because the resident's return is generally expected. Notice of transfer is provided to the resident and representative as soon as practicable before the transfer and to the long-term care (LTC) ombudsman when practicable (e.g., in a monthly list of residents that includes all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 37) and failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 53).Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated April 2, 2026, indicated that the resident was mildly cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia and epilepsy (brain condition that causes repeated seizures).Observation of Resident 2 on June 17, 2026, at 9:44 a.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her recliner watching television. Interview with Director of Rehabilitation on June 17, 2026, at 9:50 a.m. stated that they have never done a recliner safety assessment on their residents. Interview with Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 51 and 59). Findings include: A facility policy related to psychoactive/psychotropic medication use, dated January 7, 2025, indicated that the resident or resident representative has the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the Alternative or option he or she prefers. Prior to administration of a psychotropic medication, the prescribing clinician will obtain informed consent from the resident (or, as appropriate, the resident representative) for use of a psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 42 and 65). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, revealed that Section N0415F1 Antibiotic Medications was to be coded if an antibiotic medication was taken by the resident at any time during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 42, dated February 24, 2026, included an order for staff to apply 2% lidocaine/Nystatin/Silvadene /20% zinc topical cream (pain reliever/antifungal/ antibiotic/protective barrier) to the resident's sacrum (area located at the lower part of the spine) every day and evening shift for wound care. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 42, dated May 2026, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 10), and failed to follow consultant recommendations to send a representative/staff member to an appointment for a resident unable to communicate causing the appointment to be canceled and a delay in treatment for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 68).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment for Resident 10, dated March 16, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had skin tears, received application of nonsurgical dressings (with or without topical medications) other than to feet, and had a diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD-a disease that limits blood flow to the heart caused by plaque buildup in the arteries). A care plan for the resident, dated December 9, 2023, included an intervention to apply tubi-grips (compression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 42, 63) and failed to label one multi-dose vial of Tubersol solution with the date it was opened in one of two medications rooms reviewed. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated May 14, 2026, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had pain frequently, received routine and as needed pain medications, and received an opioid (narcotic pain reliever). Physician's orders for Resident 42 dated May 20, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone twice a day for pain and 5 mg of Oxycodone every six hours as needed for moderate/severe pain. A review of the controlled drug count record (tracks each dose of a controlled medication) for Resident 42,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to eat as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 37).Findings include:The facility policy for assistive devices, dated January 7, 2026, indicated that certain devices and equipment that assist with mobility, safety, and independence were provided for residents. They may include specialized eating utensils and equipment, safety devices for the bathroom, and mobility devices.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 37, dated March 31, 2026, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision from staff with eating. A care plan, dated May 22, 2026, revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutrition and was to have all foods in separate bowls for each meal.Observations of Resident 37 during the lunch meal on June 17, 2026, at 12:01 p.m. revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending July 2, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending June 17, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to correct deficient practices related to quality care, safe environment free from accident hazards, and storage and labeling of medications. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding quality of care, cited during the survey ending July 2, 2025, revealed that the facility would complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hand-washing techniques were used during medication administration for one of 35 residents observed (Residents 7).Findings include: The facility's policies regarding Medication Administration, dated January 7, 2026, indicated that staff should follow infection control procedures, including hand sanitization for administration of medications. Observations during medication administration on June 15, 2026, at 8:50 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 5 was preparing Resident 7's medications. Using her bare hands, Licensed Practical Nurse 5 took a pill out of the cup and broke it in half. She then administered the medication to Resident 7. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 5 on June 15, 2026, at 8:55 a.m. confirmed that she should not have touched the pill with her bare hands. Interview with the Director of Nursing on June 15, 2026, at 2:12 p.m. confirmed that Licensed Practical Nurse 5 should not have touched the pill with her bare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered and/or received the influenza and/or the pneumococcal immunizations for four of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 13, 37, 42).Findings include:The facility's influenza and pneumonia vaccination policies, dated January 7, 2026 revealed that all residents would be offered the influenza and pneumonia vaccines.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated April 30, 2026, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Section O0250 A (Influenza Vaccination) revealed that the resident did not receive the influenza vaccine in the facility for the year's influenza vaccination season, due to not being offered the vaccine. There was no documented evidence that the facility offered or administered the influenza vaccine to Resident 3. A quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the COVID-19 vaccination for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 13).Findings include: A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 13, dated May 29, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that she was not offered the influenza or pneumonia vaccine. Review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed no immunization or declination information documented related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 16, 2026, revealed that Resident 13 was not offered the covid vaccination and should have been. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Nursing Assistant job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to five of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10).Findings include: Review of the facility nursing assistant job description indicated that nurse aides were to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations. Review of Nurse Aide 6's personnel file revealed that she was hired on February 19, 2019. Review of her continuing education transcript revealed that she did not complete any annual education regarding Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training. Review of Nurse Aide 7's personnel file revealed that she was hired on August 21, 2017. Review of her continuing education transcript revealed that she did not complete any annual education regarding Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training. Review of Nurse Aide 8's personnel file revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and information provided by the facility, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was completed into the resident's and their family member's concern for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding complaint grievances, dated February 14, 2025, revealed that the facility ensures complaints regarding the community were resolved in a timely and appropriate manner for employees or residents who have concerns or complaints. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated September 16, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, was cognitively intact, and had a diagnosis of parkinsonism (syndrome that causes movement symptoms like tremor, stiffness, and slowness of movement).Interview with the Resident 2 on November 12, 2025, at 12:16 p.m. revealed that he was upset when a staff member got water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that fall/injury prevention interventions were in place for one of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: A facility policy for fall management, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that the interdisciplinary team reviews falls. The team will discuss and care plan recommended interventions to reduce the potential for additional falls with the resident and/or resident's representative and document in the care plan and progress note. The care plan will be reviewed and/or revised as indicated. The care Kardex will be updated as appropriate. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated July 23, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was independent with transfers and ambulation, was occasionally incontinent of urine, received therapy, had one fall since her prior assessment with no injury, and had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 17, 36) who used an air mattress. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated May 30, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with daily care needs, had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (pressure wound that forms as a result of prolonged pressure involving the fat layers beneath the skin), and had diagnoses that included dementia and Parkinson's Disease (a degenerative brain condition that affects muscle control and movement). Physician's orders for Resident 9, dated December 3, 2024, included an order for the resident to have a low air flow mattress (an inflated mattress for pressure relief) to promote skin integrity. Observations on June 30, 2025, at 11:11 a.m. revealed that Resident 9's bed was equipped with an air mattress; however,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and observations, as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of medical information for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding general dose preparation and medication administration, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that employees are to observe each resident's privacy and rights in accordance with applicable law (including blocking unnecessary access to the Medication Administration Record). Observations during medication administration on July 2, 2025, at 8:04 a.m. revealed that Registered Nurse 1 walked away from the medication cart in the hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] to administer medications to Resident 46 in room [ROOM NUMBER], and left the laptop on top of the medication cart open and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 46 was visible to staff, residents, and visitors in the hallway. Interview with Registered Nurse 1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the status of nursing licenses was checked with the State Board of Nursing for two of two nurses reviewed (Registered Nurse 2, Licensed Practical Nurse 3), and failed to complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention prom, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that the facility would conduct employee background checks and would not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individuals who have had a finding entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property; or have a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property. The personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel protocols for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: A facility policy for bowel protocol, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that the facility was to ensure that residents are free from complications secondary to constipation. This would be accomplished through adequate assessment tracking, and treatment as indicated. The evening shift nurse would provide medication as ordered according to the following bowel protocol: Give Milk of Magnesia (MOM - an oral laxative) one time if there is no bowel movement after three days at bedtime. If Milk of Magnesia is ineffective, on day four, give a Dulcolax suppository (a laxative inserted rectally). If both Milk of Magnesia and Dulcolax suppository are ineffective, on day five give a saline enema (a liquid inserted rectally to stimulate a bowel movement). The day shift nurse would monitor the daily bowel record to ensure the residents had received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's recommendations for brace application were followed for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 25). Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 25, dated May 21, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required moderate assistance for dressing and hygiene, and utilized a walker and a wheelchair. Interview with Resident 25 on June 30, 2025, at 1:29 p.m. revealed that he was to receive a back brace after he had fallen at the facility and broke his back, but he never received it. Hospital discharge records for Resident 25, dated January 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was to have a TLSO Brace (a brace that supports the back and pelvis area to reduce pain and prevent further injury) due to a back fracture. A nursing note for Resident 25, dated January 7, 2025, at 11:27 a.m., revealed that the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 17). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that documentation of narcotic administration will be done in accordance with applicable law including documenting necessary medication administration treatment information on appropriate forms. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a residents abilities and care needs) for Resident 17, dated May 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis of Parkinson's (a progressive neurological disease that affects movement), stroke, sarcopenia (a medical condition where there is a loss of muscle mass). Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated September 9, 2024, included an order for the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions and behavior), by failing to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) behavioral interventions (individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care) were attempted prior to the administration of as needed antianxiety medications (psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety) for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 47). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding psychoactive/psychotropic medication use (any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), dated February 14, 2025, indicated that psychotropic medication management for the resident will involve identifying person-centered non-pharmacological interventions (unless contraindicated) to minimize or discontinue the use of psychotropic medications. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, manufacturer's instructions, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding general dose preparation and medication administration, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that facility staff should crush oral medications only in accordance with pharmacy guidelines. Exceptions to Should Not Crush medications may occur when the physician/prescriber orders are documented in the medical record including a statement explaining why crushing the medication will not adversely affect the resident. The facility is to follow manufacturer medication administration guidelines. Manufacturer's instructions for Oxycontin extended-release tables, dated May 2024, included instructions to swallow the tablets whole. Do not break, crush, chew or dissolve the tablets. Doing so can release all the drug at once increasing the risk for overdose. The medication label included instructions to take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly secured in the medication cart. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding general dose preparation and medication administration, dated February 14, 2025, indicated that the facility should ensure that medication carts are always locked when out of sight or unattended. Observations during medication administration on July 2, 2025, at 8:04 a.m. revealed that Registered Nurse 1 walked away from the medication cart in the hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] to administer medications to Resident 46 in room [ROOM NUMBER] and left the medication cart unlocked, unattended, and out of sight in the hallway when he entered the resident's room. Interview with Registered Nurse 1 on July 2, 2025, at 8:16 a.m. confirmed that the medication cart was not locked, and it should have been. Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 2, 2025, at 11:09…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policy/protocols set forth regarding alerting the physician of a resident's change in condition, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: The facility's emergency and/or alternative physician care policy, dated February 11, 2025, indicated that if a physician's backup coverage does not respond in a timely manner, then the nursing staff will contact the medical director for assistance. The facility's current after hours tele-health physician guidelines indicated that the average response time for a consult is two to five minutes. If there is no response from a physician within five minutes, staff are to re-create the consult using the orange Contact on Call Clinician button. If no response after a second consult, a support number was to be called. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated October 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of work history reports and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions. Findings include: Review of the facility's work history report, dated July 28, 2023, through July 25, 2024, revealed that the vent was inspected and cleaned if necessary monthly with the last time being documented as inspected on July 25, 2024. Observations in the main kitchen during dish washing on July 30, 2024, at 1:28 p.m. revealed that one dietary staff member was placing dirty dishes, cups, utensils, etc. in the dish washer and then another dietary staff member would take the clean dishes, cups, utensils, etc. from the dishwasher and would leave them on the counter beside the dishwasher until she would take the items to be stored. There was a metal shelf that was above and to the left of the dish washer that had clear plastic bins and other miscellaneous items being stored on it. There was a metal shelf next to the oven with clear plastic pitchers on the top shelf. Above the two metal shelves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending August 17, 2023, and a complaint investigation survey ending March 27, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending August 1, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), developing care plans, care plan timing and revision, storage, and labeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of three of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 48, 65, 67) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: A facility policy for considerate and respectful treatment, dated March 1, 2024, indicated that staff will refrain from practices that are demeaning to patients, such as keeping urinary catheter bags uncovered. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated July 15, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required substantial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene care, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and had diagnoses that included renal insufficiency. Physician's orders for Resident 48, dated July 13, 2024, included for staff to place a foley catheter (flexible catheter used to drain urine from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and legal guardian in writing regarding the reason for hospitalization for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 22). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated June 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis which included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated June 19, 2024, included an order for the resident to be sent to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. A nursing note for Resident 19, dated June 19, 2024, at 10:26 p.m., revealed that the nurse aide yelled to the writer that the resident was choking. The physician was notified of the situation, and the resident was transferred to the emergency department via emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 51, 64). Findings include: The RAI User's Manual, dated October 2023, revealed that Section N0415I1 Antiplatelet (a group of medicines that stop blood cells (called platelets) from sticking together and forming a blood clots) Medications was to be coded if an antiplatelet medication was taken by the resident at any time during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 51, dated August 24, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 75 milligrams (mg) of Plavix (an antiplatelet) one time a day for clot prevention. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 51, dated June and July 2024, revealed that staff had administered the 75 mg of Plavix to the resident on June 27, 2024, through July 4,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address resident care needs for five of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 21, 23, 66, 68). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding person-centered care plans, dated March 15, 2024, revealed that a comprehensive person-centered care plan must be developed for each resident and must describe the services that were to be furnished, any specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services the facility would provide, and any service not provided due to refusal of treatment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 18, dated May 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was usually understood, could usually understand others, and had a diagnosis which included Multi Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 48, dated July 15, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and could understand others, required assistance with personal care needs, was dependent on staff for toileting needs, and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease. Physician's orders for Resident 48, dated July 13, 2024, included an order for the staff to insert a foley catheter (flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a bag outside the body) for urinary drainage. The current care plan for Resident 48, dated July 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was incontinent of urine. An active care plan, dated July 14, 2024, indicated that the resident had an indwelling foley catheter. Observations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay, was completed for one of two discharged residents reviewed (Resident 63). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 63, dated May 1, 2024, revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility at approximately 10:15 a.m. Verbal and written discharge instructions/medications were provided to resident and the resident's son. As of August 1, 2024, there was no documented evidence that a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay was completed for Resident 63. Interview with Medical Records Coordinator on August 1, 2024, at 5:50 p.m. confirmed that there was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was completed for Resident 63. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(d) Clinical Records.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians orders were followed for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 44, 68). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 44, dated May 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand, required assistance from staff for care needs, and had a diagnosis which included dementia. A fall investigation for Resident 44, dated April 25, 2024, at 7:19 p.m., indicated that the resident was observed sitting on the floor. She tried to transfer herself from the wheelchair to the bed without assistance. The resident hit the back of her head on the front wheel of the wheelchair. An assessment was completed and her oxygen saturation (the percentage of oxygen circulating in the blood-with a normal range being greater than 92) was in the low 70's. The physician was notified that of the fall, and orders were received to start neurological checks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were obtained for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 65). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 65, including nurses notes, revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]; had diagnoses that included urinary retention; and had a foley catheter (tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder). There was no documented evidence that a physician's order was obtained to indicate that the resident required a foley catheter. The care plan for Resident 65, dated July 24, 2024, indicated that the resident required an indwelling foley catheter because of urinary retention. Nurse's notes for Resident 65, dated July 22, 2024, at 3:15 p.m., revealed that the resident arrived at the facility for admission by ambulance and had a urinary catheter intact for urinary retention. A nurse's note, dated July 28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for two of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 2, Nurse Aide 5). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 2 was due January 20, 2024. As of July 31, 2024, there was no documented evidence that the annual performance evaluation was completed as required for Nurse Aide 2. A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 5 was due May 13, 2024. As of July 31, 2024, there was no documented evidence that the annual performance evaluation was completed as required for Nurse Aide 5. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 31, 2024, at 2:03 p.m. confirmed that there was no evidence that the annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 2 and Nurse Aide 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of eye drops with the date they were opened in one of two medication carts reviewed (Cart 2). Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for the use of Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005 percent (used for the reduction of elevated fluid pressure of the eye), dated November 3, 2023, revealed that once a bottle is opened for use, it may be stored at room temperature for six weeks. The facility's policy regarding the storage of medication, dated March 15, 2024, revealed that medications are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. Physician's orders for Resident 65, dated July 22, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive one drop of Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005 percent in both eyes at nightly at bedtime. Observations of the Cart 2 medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 29, 34) who received hospice services. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hospice (specialized care that provides physical comfort and emotional, social and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life), dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the designated interdisciplinary team member will be responsible for obtaining the following from the hospice: most recent hospice plan of care; hospice election form, and the physician's certification and recertification of terminal illness (a form signed by the resident's hospice physician and specific to each patient). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated May 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was rarely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 21). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a list of nurse aides currently employed by the facility, including their hire dates and training hours, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides had 12 hours of in-service training annually for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 1, Nurse Aide 2, Nurse Aide 3). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire: Nurse Aide 1 should have received at least 12 hours of in-service training between June 11, 2023, and June 11, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that she received at least 12 hours of in-service training as required. Nurse Aide 2 should have received at least 12 hours of in-service training between January 20, 2023, and January 20, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that she received at least 12 hours of in-service training as required. Nurse Aide 3 should have received at least 12 hours of in-service training between January 16, 2023, and January 16, 2024. However, there was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, resident council meeting minutes, and facility grievance/complaint logs, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its grievance policies regarding maintaining a log of all grievances received and failed to ensure that grievances were responded to in a timely manner for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 4), and failed to include the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusion regarding the resident's concerns, or any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding grievances/complaints, dated February 28, 2024, indicated that upon receipt of the grievance/concern, the grievance/concern form will be initiated by the staff member receiving the concern and documented on the grievance/concern log. The department manager will contact the person filing the grievance to acknowledge receipt, investigate the grievance, take corrective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A facility policy regarding plans of care, dated February 28, 2024, revealed that the care plan must be customized to each individual patient's preferences and needs. The care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated February 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, and had diagnoses that included seizures and traumatic brain injury (TBI - an injury that affects how the brain works). A care plan for the resident, dated March 4, 2024, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
APT, FREDERICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
FISHER, MARIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
MURRAY, JASONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
ZUBAK, GEORGEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 7%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$380per resident / day
operating cost
$11,556per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$349per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next