Greenville Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 127.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)1's physician of elevated blood pressures for 1 of 1 resident, reviewed for notification of changes.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Change In a Resident's Condition or Status with a complete revision date of February 2021 states, Policy Statement: Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care. billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): . d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; . 2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain and administer missing Lacosamide, a seizure medication, for Resident (R)2, resulting in the resident not receiving 11 doses of the medication from 1/7-1/13, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed.Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, with a revision date of June 2025 revealed, Policy Statement: The interdisciplinary team monitors medication usage to prevent and detect medication - related problems such as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and side effects. Medication Errors: 1. A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with provider's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principals of the professional(s) providing services. 2. Examples of medication errors include: a. omission- a drug is ordered but not administered;Review of R2's Face Sheet revealed he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that menus were followed in regard to serving sizes. This had the potential to affect 120 of 124 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen and placed them at nutritional risk. The facility identified four resident who were nothing by mouth (NPO). Findings include: Review of policy titled Diet Accuracy with a revision date 2/23, revealed Tray cards are to be used on the tray line for service and checked prior to leaving the kitchen for accuracy. Proper portions are to be served according to menu extensions. During an observations on 04/24/25 at 11:30 AM of the serving line in the kitchen revealed the menu being served was, honey glazed turkey with poultry gravy, mashed potatoes, roasted brussels sprouts, cornbread square, margarine, and pumpkin cheesecake bar. Resident's meal tickets indicated they were to get anywhere from two ounces (oz) to six oz of turkey. While watching the serving line, some slices of turkey were large and some were small; there was no consistency to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and test tray sample, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at the proper temperature. This had the potential to affect 120 of 124 residents who consumed food from the kitchen and for them to be at nutritional risk. The facility identified four residents who were nothing by mouth. (NPO). Findings include: 1.Review of R89's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/25 and located under the MDS tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R89 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 11:15 AM with R89, R89 indicated that the food was served cold. 2. Review of R88's annual MDS with an ARD of 03/29/25 located under the MDS tab in the EMR, revealed that R88 had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 04/22/25 at 11:35 AM with R88 indicated that the food was usually served cold, and the bread was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to allow immediate family or other relatives the right to visit at any time for one (Resident (R) 122), reviewed for visitation of 31 sample residents. This had the potential for the resident to experience a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Visitation with a revision date of 08/22 revealed, Our facility permits residents to receive visitors subject to the resident's wishes and the protection of the rights of other residents in the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Residents are permitted to have visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing. The facility provides 24-hour access to individuals visiting with the consent of the resident. Review of R122's admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated that R122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R122's admission Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for one (Resident (R) 89) reviewed for abuse was reported to the state agency (SA) within two hours of knowledge of the alleged verbal abuse. The failure to timely report allegations of abuse put the resident at risk for further abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating with a revision date 04/21, indicated, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) . If resident abuse (staff to resident and/or resident to resident), neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident's property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for one (Resident (R)89) reviewed for abuse out of a total of 31 sampled, was thoroughly investigated. The failure to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse had the potential for further abuse to the resident. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program with a revision date 04/21, indicated, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to . verbal abuse. Identifying barriers such as fear of retaliation or causing trouble for someone and implementing interventions to remove barriers and promote a culture of transparency and reporting, investigating, and reporting any allegations within the timeframes required by federal requirements, and protecting residents from any further harm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a written transfer notice that contained all required information was provided to three of three residents and/or their representative (Resident (R) 87, R113, and R83) reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfer out of 31 sample residents. This failure has the potential to affect the resident and their Resident Representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency, dated December 2016, revealed .(4) should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures: .(d) prepare a transfer form to send with the resident. 1. Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed (R)87 admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of maintenance documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one siderail was securely attached to the bed for one Resident (R)33) of one resident reviewed for side rails, which resulted in a fall, which required hospitalization out of a sample of 31 residents. After the fall, R33 developed a hematoma and pain to the right leg. This had the potential for other residents to have side rail safety issues that had the potential for residents to fall or sustain injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails Program, revised in August 2022, revealed: Maintenance staff routinely inspect all bed and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. Any worn or malfunctioning bed system components are repaired or replaced using components that meet manufacturer specifications. Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that facility's Binding Arbitration Agreement (BAA) was explained to residents in a manner that they understood for three out of three (Residents (R)68, R117, and R276) out of a total sample of 31 residents. The facility further failed to ensure the BAA informed residents and/or representative they had the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days. This failure placed the 122 residents at risk of signing an agreement they did not understand. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Binding Arbitration Agreements dated November 2023 revealed, Residents (or representatives) are informed of the nature and implications of any proposed binding arbitration agreements so as to make informed decisions on whether to enter into such agreements . 1. Residents (or their representatives) have the right to make informed decisions about important aspects of their health, welfare, and safety . 5. The terms and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $656K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC