Sandpiper Post Acute
1049 Anna Knapp Boulevard, Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (843) 881-3210 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $73,787 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.3% | 11.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 3.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.8% | 12.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.1% | 21.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.6% | 90.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.8% | 16.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.7% | 15.3% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.0% | 78.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.5% | 24.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.72 | 2.04 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.8%CMS range 41.9–60.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.1–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 89.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.8–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 161.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect 3 of 3 residents (Resident (R)2, R51 and R159) from physical abuse, out of a sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility enabled R68 to physically abuse R2, R51, and R159 by not properly supervising R68.On 06/29/26, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 06/29/26 at 9:30 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 01/25/26. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.12 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation.On 06/30/26 at 1:06 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 06/30/26 at 4:30 PM, the survey team, validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assess, supervise, and provide proper safety protocols for residents that smoke, for 2 of 6 residents (Resident (R)123 and R101) reviewed for accidents/hazards. On 04/16/24 at 5:17 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to conduct smoking assessments, ensure residents were adequately supervised during smoking, ensuring safety protocols, and providing a safe environment for residents that smoke constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 04/16/24 at 5:17 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the Center of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) IJ Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 04/10/24 at 4:33 PM. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 04/17/24 the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 04/18/24 at 8:40 AM the survey team, validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ as of 04/16/24. The facility remained out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to Resident (R)1's usage of bedrails. On [DATE] at 3:25 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On [DATE] at 3:25 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of [DATE]. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.21 - Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan. On [DATE] at 6:32 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On [DATE] at 7:00 PM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of compliance at F656 at a lower scope and severity of D. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-05 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was properly assessed for the usage of bedrails to prevent entrapment, educated on the risks and benefits of bed rails with R1 and/or his Resident Representative, and to ensure consents were in place prior to the use of bedrails. On [DATE] at 3:23 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On [DATE] at 3:27 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of [DATE]. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25: Quality of Care. On [DATE] at 6:38 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On [DATE] at 7:00 PM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents/hazards for 1 of 3 residents. Specifically, on 08/10/23, Resident (R)1 had a successful elopement from the facility. On 08/15/23 at 6:06 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 08/15/23 at 6:06 PM, the Administrator in Training (AIT) and the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCT) were notified that the failure to prevent a resident from successfully eloping the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689, at Past Non-Compliance (PNC) On 08/15/23 at 6:06 PM the survey team provided the AIT and the RDCT with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 08/10/23. On 08/16/23 at 12:47 PM, the facility presented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a timely notification to the provider or nurse practitioner (NP) of the delayed delivery of a medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident (R)172) in the sample of 33 residents. Specifically, R172 missed two doses of intravenous (IV) medication and there was no evidence in the medical record the provider or NP was notified. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's health and recovery from sepsis.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Reconciliation of Medication on admission dated 2017 revealed, Any medications not received timely from pharmacy the physician will be notified. Review of R172's electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet under Profile tab revealed an admission date of 06/02/26 and a discharge date of 06/05/26, with diagnoses including but not limited to Hepatic Biliary Necrosis (the localized death of bile duct tissues) and Septic Shock (a life-threatening immune…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment, including but not limited to ensuring maintenance services were conducted as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, the bedroom walls were gauged and scraped and the bathroom door had scuff marks and was unable to open fully. This deficient practice affected eight resident (R)76, R141, R147, R17, R82, R35, R145 and R96) in the census of 151. The facility failed to provide a homelike environment and easy access in and out of resident rooms and bathrooms. Findings include: The undated Common Area Checklist revealed, General and Common Area items to review daily. These items include monitoring doors, walls, trims, baseboards, and flooring. During an observation on 04/08/25 at 10:00 AM, R76's room revealed extensive and deep wall scrapings along the side of the resident bed. During an observation on 04/08/25 at 10:08 AM, the bathroom door for R82 and R35's room could not open more than approximately half-way…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, document review and policy review, the facility failed to have menu spreadsheets and/or follow menu spreadsheets for portion sizes for three (Resident (R)51, R61 and R92) of three residents reviewed for menus and therapeutic diets for 81 residents reviewed for menus. This deficient practice could cause residents to choke on food and/or lose weight. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Menus dated 2001 revealed, 1. Menus meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board (National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences). 2. Menus for regular and therapeutic diets are written at least two (2) weeks in advance and are dated and posted in the kitchen at least one (1) week in advance. Review of the facility's diet roster dated 04/10/25 located in the EMR under the Report tab revealed 37 residents were prescribed a mechanical soft diet, 14 residents were prescribed a pureed diet, 42 residents were prescribed a CCHO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and ensure signage for Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) was posted for residents who had a urinary catheter, gastrostomy tube (G-tube), dialysis, and/or open wounds for 13 of 34 residents (Resident (R) R113, R412, R16, R151, R126, R88, R119, R75, R38. R10, R22, R114, and R101) reviewed for EBP. As a result of this deficient practice the staff had the potential to spread infections from one resident to another. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 03/24, revealed EBP's are (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO colonization. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. a. Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity (as opposed to before entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 65 years or older, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer pneumovax recommended updates for five of five residents (Residents (R)49, R39, R86, R53, and R83) reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations out of a total sample of 34 residents, the opportunity for the resident to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for these residents to contract pneumonia. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine dated 10/19 indicated, All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines or revaccinations will be made in accordance with current CDC recommendations at the time of the vaccination. Review of CDC recommendation pneumococcal vaccination for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for one resident (Resident (R)87) of two sampled residents reviewed for hospice in a total sample of 34. The facility failed to complete the significant change assessment when R87 revoked hospice services due to an improvement in his condition. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the RAI manual version 3.0 dated October 2024, page 2-25 revealed, .An SCSA [significant change in status assessment] is required to be performed when a resident is receiving hospice services and then decides to discontinue those services (known as revoking of hospice care). The ARD [assessment reference date] must be within 14 days from one of the following: 1) the effective date of the hospice election revocation (which can be the same or later than the date of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for two (Residents (R)87 and R135) in a total sample of 34. The facility failed to accurately code a significant change assessment for prognosis of terminal illness for R87 and for mental status for R135. These failures placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the October 2024 RAI manual, page 1-5 revealed, .An accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations .It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the MDS items on the assessment, and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during the observation period) by the IDT (interdisciplinary team) completing the assessment . Review of the October 2024 RAI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was accurate and complete within 48 hours of admission to the facility for one of nine residents (Resident (R)412) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 34 residents. The deficient practice had the potential for the lack of care planning for the specific needs of the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans-Baseline revised 12/22 revealed, A baseline plan of care should be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. The baseline care plan should include instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident . Review of R412's admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 03/26/25 with a readmission date of 04/08/25 with medical diagnosis that included end stage renal disease (ESRD) Observations on 04/08/25 at 5:30 PM revealed R412 had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) inserted in the abdomen, a central venous catheter (CVC) inserted in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive plan of care with measurable goals for one of 34 sampled residents (R) 16) reviewed for care plans. The failure to implement the care plan intervention for pressure ulcers of a cushion to the resident's wheelchair placed the resident at risk of an ongoing decline in healing of the pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated March 2022 indicated, .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan should include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs . The care plan interventions should be derived from information obtained from the resident and his/her family/responsible party, with possible discretionary modifications resulting from the comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan should: Describe the services that are to be furnished in an attempt to assist the resident attain or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan was revised/updated for one resident (Resident (R)87) in a total sample of 34 care plans reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to update the care plan when R87 revoked hospice services, had the gastrostomy tube (G-tube-a tube placed into the abdomen for medications and nourishment) removed and had the enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) removed. This failure placed the resident at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R87 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of anoxic brain injury (lack of oxygen to the brain). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/02/25 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15 which indicated R87…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate the possible underlying issue for significant weight loss and assessed the resident before the use of a psychotropic drug for weight loss for one (Resident (R)51) of 10 sampled residents reviewed for nutritional status. This had the potential to cause further weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and intervention revised 03/22 revealed, Weight Assessment .3. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. a. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing.Evaluation, 1. Undesirable weight change is evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. 2. The physician and the multidisciplinary team identify conditions and medications that may be causing anorexia, weight loss or increasing the risk of weight loss. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutritional Assessment revised 10/17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, resident record, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis treatments, staff were using Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) when providing direct resident care for two of three residents (Resident (R) 113 and R412) reviewed for dialysis care. The facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for dialysis treatment and accurate interventions were documented in the care plan. The deficient practice has the potential for the residents to not receive dialysis care in the facility. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident dated 09/19 revealed, Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. Education and training of staff includes, specifically: the care of grafts and fistulas. The resident's comprehensive care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of five residents (Resident (R) 145) out of a total sample of 33 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Specifically, the facility failed to follow adequate monitoring of blood pressure parameters before the unnecessary administration of blood pressure medications, according to physician orders. This failure had the potential to increase the risk for serious adverse effects. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications dated April 2019 indicated, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any time frame.1. Review of R145's admission Record found in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, localized hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and edema. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% when two oral medications were not administered according to the physician's order for two (Residents (R)20 and R80) of seven residents observed during medication pass. This consisted of two medications errors in 30 opportunities for a 6.67% error rate. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Oral Medications dated 2001 revealed, .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame .The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) before giving the medication . 1. During a medication pass observation on 04/10/25 at 8:39 AM. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 8removed a multivitamin (MVI) with iron tablet from a bottle in the top drawer of the medication and placed the medication into the medication cup. In addition, there was one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, document review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure narcotic counts were initialed by the on-coming nurse (7:00AM to 7:00PM) and the off-going nurse (7:00PM to 7:00AM) at the change of shift to ensure the narcotic count was accurate for eight of eight medications carts reviewed. This failure had the potential for drug diversion. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances dated 2001 revealed, .Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count .The nurse coming on duty and nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services . 1. Review of the medication cart identified as 100 hall-cart 1 on 04/09/25 at 9:23 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 revealed on 04/07/25 the on-coming and off-going nurse did not identify how many narcotic cards were in the narcotic box at the end of the shift. In addition, on 04/08/25 the off-going nurse did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, resident record, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis treatments had accurate documentation of care provided for the dialysis site for two of three residents (Resident (R) 113 and R412) reviewed for dialysis care. The deficient practice has the potential for the residents to not receive dialysis care in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R113's admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of 6/29/22 with medical diagnosis that included chronic kidney disease, stage three. Review of R113's physician orders under the Orders tab in the EMR documented an order dated 03/26/25 indicating, Resident has arteriovenous (AV) fistula (shunt) located on [right]chest wall. Monitor for presence of bruit (auscultation) and thrill (palpation of vibration) [every] shift. Notify MD [Medical Doctor] if unable to auscultate of palpate. Monitor [each] shift for bleeding. Drainage, excessive warmth, pain, redness, numbness in fingers, tenderness, or swelling. Check circulation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect residents private health information, for 3 of 8 residents. Specifically, a nurse did not secure the computer screen while administering medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Protected Health Information (PHI), Uses and Disclosures of documented, The facility will make reasonable efforts to limit the use or disclosure of PHI to only the minimum necessary use to accomplish the intended purpose of the use, disclosure or request. During an observation on 01/28/25 at 5:16 PM, revealed a nurse's medication cart was left unattended, while the nurse was administering medications. Further observation revealed, the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) was still open on the computer screen, revealing multiple residents listed on the screen. During an interview on 01/28/25 at 5:18 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated, You are interviewing me about my screen being open. I was gone for three minutes. I went to give morphine to a resident. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 certified nursing assistants (CNA)s received annual performance reviews. Findings include: On 04/18/24 at approximately 8:10 AM, the Regional Director revealed the facility does not have a policy specific to performance reviews for CNAs. Review of 3 CNA personnel files revealed, CNA5, CNA6, and CNA7's annual performance reviews were not completed by the facility in the past year. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 1:40 PM, the Regional Director of Clinical Services revealed that CNAs do not receive performance reviews. Instead, they are given a 2% raise if they have not received any disciplinary actions over the year. During an interview on 04/17/24 at 1:23 PM, the Administrator revealed performance reviews will be done annually moving forward. CNA performance levels will be evaluated once they reach their yearly marks, and Human Resources (HR) will notify them when year marks are approaching.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, manufacturer labeling and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored in 5 of 8 medication carts, 4 of 4 treatment carts and 2 of 4 medication rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised on [DATE] states: Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments . The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Discontinued, outdated or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. Review of the facility policy titled Security of Medication Cart revised on [DATE] states: The cart must be locked before the nurse enters the resident's room. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of nurses' view. When the medication cart is not being used, it must be locked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff wore beard/hair restraints while cooking, preparing, or assembling food. Furthermore, the facility failed to to properly store, label/date and discard expired foods for 1 of 1 kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service revised on 11/2022, revealed, Policy Statement: Food and nutrition services employees, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Food and nutrition services staff wear hair restraints (hair net, beard restraint, etc.) so that hair does not contact food. Review of the facility policy titled, Staff Attire revised on 10/2023, revealed, Policy Statement: All employees wear approved attire for the performance of their duties. All staff members will have their hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods revised on 04/2018, revealed, Policy Statement: All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide dignity to Resident (R)129 prior to entering her room, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity last revised on 02/29/21, revealed, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth, and self-esteem. Residents' private space and property shall be respected at all times . staff will knock and request permission before entering residents' rooms. Review of R129's Face Sheet revealed R129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses including but not limited to: congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, restless leg syndrome, and osteoarthritis. Review of R129's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/28/24, revealed R129 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)273's representative of a room change for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Room Change/Room Assignment revised on May 2017 stated, Documentation of a room change is documented in the facility record. Notice of a room change will include why the change is being made . all parties involved in the change/assignment and their representatives will be given notice of such change . Review of the facility policy titled Change in the Residents Condition or Status revised on February 2021 stated, A nurse will notify the residents representative when there is a need to change the residents room assignment. Review of R273's Face Sheet revealed R273 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: fracture of right lower leg, left rib fracture, vertebral fracture, cognitive communication deficit, and alcohol abuse. Review of R273's South…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation. Furthermore, the facility neglected to provide care for R58 for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect last revised on 03/31/28, revealed abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. The nurse will assess the individual and document findings. Assessment data will include injury assessment; pain assessment; current behaviors; patient's age and sex; all current medications; all active diagnoses; and behavior over last 24 hours. The physician and staff will help identify risk factors within the facility, for example, significant numbers of residents with unmanaged problematic behaviors. Review of R160's Face Sheet revealed R160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation and an allegation of neglect to the state agency in a timely manner as required by federal regulation, for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect last revised on 03/31/28, revealed, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. All aged violations of involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported to the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies: the state licensing/certification agency responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)60 with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled ADLs, Supporting last revised on 03/31/18 revealed, Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADLs. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Review of R60's Face Sheet revealed R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, rheumatoid, dementia with behaviors, anxiety disorder due to known…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to properly position the catheter bag for Residents (R)163, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary revised on August 2022, revealed, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complication, including urinary tract infections. Infection control: 2. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of R163's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/11/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to: retention of urine, presence of urogenital implants, and edema. Review of the Order Summary Report' for the month of April 2024, revealed an order, dated 04/01/24, for foley catheter: 16 french 10 cc bulb, and change as needed. Review of R163's Care plan revised on 04/01/24, revealed the resident was at risk for complication with urinary system related to indwelling catheter. Interventions initiated on 03/30/24 revealed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assess and provide pain medication as prescribed to Resident (R)60 in a timely manner, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pain. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain- Clinical Protocol last revised on 10/31/22 revealed, The Physician and staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain. The nursing staff will assess each individual for pain upon admission to the facility, at the quarterly review, whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain. Staff will provide elements of a comforting environment and appropriate physical and complementary interventions; for example local heat or ice, repositioning, massage, and the opportunity to talk about chronic pain. Review of R60's Face Sheet revealed R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)3 with a dinner meal tray for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for food. Findings include: Review of R3's Face Sheet revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: absence of kidney, muscle weakness, epilepsy, and end stage renal disease. Review of R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/22/24 revealed R3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicates that she is cognitively intact. Review of R3's Physician Orders for April 2024 revealed the following order, Regular, Large Portion diet, Regular texture, thin liquids consistency. During an interview on 04/16/24 at 8:40 AM, R3 revealed they did not receive their dinner tray on 04/15/24, when they returned back to the hospital. R3 stated that she got back from the hospital around 4:30 PM or 5:00 PM and does not understand why staff did not bring her a tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an incident involving death to the State Agency (SA) within two (2) hours. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, with a revision date of [DATE] revealed Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Section 3 indicates, Immediately is defined as: within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury . The SA received a call on [DATE] at 3:47 PM from the [NAME] County Coroner's Office indicating they had received an anonymous tip that a resident had expired after being found caught…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-19 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow preplanned menus and make food substitutions that were equal in nutritional value for 153 of 163 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Week 3 Spring Menu 2023 revealed, the menu included meat or entrée, a vegetable, carbohydrate, and dessert. The alternate menu revealed residents could receive peanut butter and jelly, egg salad, chicken salad, and pimento cheese. Residents may also request chicken noodle soup. During an observation in the kitchen, with the cook (C)10, the Dietary Manager (DM) and the Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM), on 05/18/23 from 12:15 PM through 1:03 PM revealed, lunch included spaghetti with meat sauce, steamed mixed vegetables, garlic bread and a brownie. The DM stated that residents who were allergic to tomatoes, would receive spaghetti with no meat or sauce, steamed vegetables, garlic bread and baked chicken. The DM further stated residents who required mechanical soft meals would receive ground beef and rice. The puree meal was pureed ground beef and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly in 2 of 2 dumpster. Findings include: During the kitchen tour on 05/17/23 at 6:59 AM with the Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM), two dumpsters were observed in the back of the facility. There were no lids on the dumpsters and refuse was sticking out of the top of one dumpster. Further observation revealed, wood lying on the ground and carts that had dried paint on them. During an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 05/18/23 at 10:57 AM, the MD stated there had been a lot of construction going on with the building, so that was why the wood, and paint and other items were by the trash dumpster. The MD stated he would call the company when the trash was getting full, and they would pick it up. He stated there was no scheduled pick up for trash, it would only occur when he contacted the trash company.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, during the facility's resident council meeting, the facility failed to ensure that 9 Residents (R)8, R12, R41, R52, R65, R71, R117, R114, and R123 out of 163 residents received mail delivery on Saturdays. Findings include: During a resident council meeting on 05/18/23 at 11:00 AM with nine residents (R)8, R12, R41, R52, R65, R71, R117, R114, and R123 in attendance, revealed residents do not always receive mail on the weekends. The residents stated they did not receive mail this past Saturday (05/13/23). The residents further stated the activities staff were responsible for delivering the residents' mail. During an interview on 05/19/23 at 9:05 AM with the Activities Director (AD) revealed, the activities staff were responsible for delivering the residents' mail, however on the weekends, if the activities staff are not working then it is the responsibility of the front desk receptionist to deliver the mail. During an interview on 05/19/23 at 9:10 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)16, who works as the front desk receptionist, revealed the weekend front desk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)90 of a total of 36 residents reviewed in the sample was appropriately assessed for self-administration of medication. Specifically, R90 had a bottle of Tums Chewable Antacid Medication at his bedside and there was no assessment or care plan related to the resident's self-administration of this medication. In addition, R90 did not have a physician's order for the medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated 02/2021 read, in pertinent part, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the inter-disciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so; and As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the inter-disciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administration of medication is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each Medicare resident whose Medicare therapy services were terminated received a notice including the reason the services were ending or what the options were prior to the discontinuation of therapy services. This had the potential to affect 1 of 3 Residents (R58) who were reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review. Findings include: Review of R58's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R58 was receiving Medicare benefits and she was discontinued from skilled therapy services on 01/10/23. R58 had not exhausted her Medicare benefit days. However, the facility failed to notify her representative regarding the expiration of benefits prior to the expiration date. R58's benefits ended on 01/10/23 and her representative was notified on 01/13/23, three days later. Review of R58's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 Resident (R)5, 119, and 414, reviewed for hospital transfers out of a total sample of 36 residents, contained documentation that the resident and/or the resident representative and ombudsman were provided a written notice of transfer when the residents were transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency dated 08/2018 revealed, Policy: Emergency transfers or discharges may be necessary to protect the health and/or well-being of the resident(s) . Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 4. Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures .e. Notify the representative (sponsor) or other family member. Further review of the policy reveals the facility policy fails to address providing written notification to the resident, resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Level 1 PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) in order to potentially generate a Level 2 PASARR assessment for 1 Resident (R) R145, who had a diagnosis of major mental illness with significant behavioral disturbances, of four residents reviewed for PASSAR. There were 36 residents reviewed in the sample. The findings include: During an interview with the facility's Social Services Director (SSD) on 05/18/23 at 12:55 PM, she stated the facility did not have a specific policy for PASARR evaluations, but rather the facility relied upon the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (SCDHHS) for guidance related to PASARR. The SSD further stated, per the SCDHHS, a Level 1 screening was expected to be accurate and referral for a Level 2 PASARR was expected to be timely and based upon accurate information gathered within the Level 1 PASARR Screening. She indicated Level 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop a care plan with interventions for 1 Resident (R)160, with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from a sample of 36 residents. This has the potential for the staff to not provide appropriate and compassionate care specific to this resident's trauma needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care dated March 2022 revealed, As part of the comprehensive assessment, identify history of trauma or interpersonal violence when possible. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences may involve record review or the use of screening tools. Review of R160's undated Diagnoses sheet located in the electronic medical records (EMR) tab titled Medical Diagnosis revealed, the resident has a diagnosis that included PTSD. Review of R160's Onsite Behavioral Health Comprehensive Exam dated 5/12/23, located in the EMR, under the tab Practitioner Notes documented the resident was diagnosed with PTSD but has not exhibited any signs or symptoms of flashback…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide oral and personal hygiene care for 2 Residents (R)83 and R159, that are dependent on staff for all areas of care, from a sample of 36 residents. Specifically, R83 was identified as incontinent of bowel and bladder, and R159 was observed with dry and cracked lips. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with a revision date of March 2018 documents, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 1. During an observation on 05/19/23 at 1:50 PM revealed, R83 receiving incontinent care from Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN)13. R83 was observed to have reddened areas to her sacrum and buttocks, bruising to the groin area (in the process of healing), and her labia area was reddened. The resident had been incontinent of her bowels. Review of R83's Diagnoses sheet located in the electronic medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was available per order for one Resident (R)37 of 36 total residents reviewed in the sample. R37 returned from the hospital with orders for antibiotic medication related to his diagnosis of a urinary tract infection (UTI) and the medication was not available for administration for four days after the resident's return. The findings include: Review of R37's admission Record dated 05/19/23 located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Admissions Tab, indicated R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to; multiple sclerosis (MS), disorder of the brain, and history of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Review of R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/23 located in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R37 is cognitively intact. Review of R37's Order Summary Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 Resident (R)12 reviewed for smoking was appropriately assessed for safe smoking. Specifically, R12 was not routinely assessed to ensure safe smoking practices or the need for assistance with smoking. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Smoking Policy read, in pertinent part, This facility has established and maintains safe smoking practices; and Resident smoking status is evaluated upon admission. If a smoker, the evaluation includes a. current level of tobacco consumption b. Method of tobacco consumption (traditional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes; pipe; etc.) c. desire to quit smoking; and d. ability to smoke safely with or without supervision (per completed Safe Smoking Evaluation;) and A resident's ability to smoke safely is re-evaluated quarterly, upon significant change, (physical or cognitive) and as determined by the staff; and Any resident with smoking privileges…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper positioning of 1 of 1 Resident (R)159's urinary drainage bag, from a sample of 36 residents. Specifically, R159's urinary drainage bag was observed laying flat on the floor. This has the potential for the resident to develop reoccurring urinary tract infection (UTI). Finding include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Suprapubic Catheter Care with a revision date of October 2010, revealed, General Guidelines include the following . The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder. During an observation on 05/17/23 at 9:01 AM revealed R159 lying in a low bed with the head of the bed (HOB) elevated 30 degrees. R159 had a catheter connected to a urinary drainage bag with a privacy covering. There was yellow urine with sediment in the tubing. The drainage bag was lying flat on the floor. During an observation on 05/18/23 at 9:43 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. During observation of medication pass, there were seven errors observed out of 37 opportunities, resulting in an 18% error rate. This had the potential to place 1 Resident (R)81 at risk of not receiving the full benefit of their medication therapy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration revised on 01/01/22, read in pertinent part, 4.1 Facility staff should: 4.1.1 Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident, as set forth in facility's medication administration schedule. Review of R81's Order Summary Report located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Report tab, revealed Buspirone HCl Tablet 7.5 MG (milligrams), Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Anxiety -Start Date- 11/23/22; Baclofen Tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to adhere to guidance for 1 of 1 Resident (R)214) on Contact Isolation Precautions from a sample of 36 residents. This has the potential to spread this organism throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Isolation Categories of Transmission Based Precautions with revision date of November 2022 direct staff as follow: If possible, place the resident in a private room. Staff and visitors wear gloves when entering the room. While caring for a resident, staff will change gloves after having contact with infective material (for example, fecal material and wound drainage). Gloves are removed and hand hygiene performed before leaving the room. Staff avoid touching potentially contaminated environmental surfaces or items in the resident's room after gloves are removed. Staff and visitors wear a disposable gown upon entering the room and remove before leaving the room and avoid touching potentially contaminated surfaces with clothing after gown is removed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-10 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the previous three years of surveys, complaint investigations and any plans of corrections were made readily accessible to residents, families, or visitors. This failure placed all the residents, families, and visitors at risk of not being provided with information on the facility's quality of care. Findings included: During a tour of the facility on 04/08/25 at 4:29 PM, the survey book, which was located on the wall at the entrance to the activity room, revealed no previous surveys, certifications, complaint investigations and any plans of correction between 2022 and present. Review of the Casper [an acronym for Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting] report revealed the following surveys and complaint investigations occurred at the facility since 2022: May 2023 a federal survey with citations and the plan of correction; 08/27/24 complaint investigation which was substantiated and the plan of correction; 10/09/24 complaint investigation which was unsubstantiated; 11/21/24 complaint investigation which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$73,787 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $7,882 — penalty dated 2025-04-10
- $49,104 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
- $3,801 — penalty dated 2024-01-05
- $13,000 — penalty dated 2024-01-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALMETTO MASTER TENANT, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/19/2021 |
| OUTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2022 |
| LITCHFIELD, TANNER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/20/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in SC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 425146. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.