Piedmont Post-Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two staff members assisted with a mechanical lift transfer for 1 Resident (R)1 of 4 residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The failure resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to the top right side of their head, which required three staples to repair. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, revised 07/2017, revealed, 1. At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. 2. Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks that require: a. Lifting a resident from the floor; b. Transferring a resident from bed to chair; c. Lateral transfers; d. Lifting limbs; e. Toileting or bathing; or f. Repositioning. 3. Types of lifts that may be available in the facility are: a. Floor based full body sling lifts; b. Overhead full body sling lifts; and c. Sit-to-stand lifts. 4. Lift design and operation vary across manufactures. Staff must be trained and demonstrate competency using the specific machines or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff checked temperatures of all foods placed on the steam table for hot holding prior to meal service. Specifically, staff failed to check temperatures of additional batches of food added to the steam table during meal service on 04/03/2026. This had the potential to affect 80 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Serving Temperatures for Hot and Cold Foods, effective 2020, revealed, The cook will take temperatures of hot and cold food items using approved food thermometers prior to each meal service. During an observation on 04/03/2026 at 12:36 PM, Dietary Aide (DA)21 placed a new batch of fried chicken on the tray line and plated a plate for a resident and did not take the temperature of the fried chicken. The Assistant Dietary Director (ADD) asked DA21 if she took the temperature of the chicken and DA21 revealed she did not. During a continued observation of the tray line for lunch on 04/03/2026 at 12:55 PM, a new pan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, which affected 1 of 1 resident, (Resident (R)92), reviewed for tracheostomy care, 1 of 1 resident, (R9), reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 1 of 1 resident, (R87), reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility also failed to implement a complete water management program for Legionella prevention, which had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings included: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Tracheostomy Care, revised 10/2023, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to guide tracheostomy care and the cleaning of reusable tracheostomy cannulas. The policy revealed, Procedure Guidelines included, 8. Remove old dressings. Pull soiled glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle, and 9. Perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5 percent (%) or less. There were 6 errors out of 44 opportunities, which resulted in a medication error rate of 13.64% for 3 (Residents (R)22, (R)14, and (R)62) of 3 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, indicated, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted R22 on 03/23/2026. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included but was not limited to a diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/30/2026, revealed R22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Review of R22's Order Summary Report, with active orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to remove a lidocaine patch for 1 (Resident (R)62) of 3 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, indicated, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of Manufacturer guidelines titled, Lidoderm, dated 01/2015, revealed, Apply Lidoderm to intact skin to cover the most painful area. Apply the prescribed number of patches (maximum of 3), only once for up to 12 hours within a 24-hour period. Review of R62's admission Record revealed the facility admitted R62 on 12/24/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included but was not limited to diagnoses of infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter and muscle weakness. Review of R62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient bowel monitoring for 1 (Resident (R)26) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for bowel monitoring. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Bowel Management Protocol, dated 02/15/2015, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are free from complications secondary to constipation. This will be accomplished through adequate assessment, tracking and treatment as indicated. The policy also indicated, Normal bowel pattern is once every day up to once every three (3) days. Constipation results from factors such as immobility, decreased activity, and as a side effect of numerous medications. The policy also indicated, CNAs [certified nursing assistants] to document each shift the number of bowel movements and size of bowel movements on the resident flow record. The policy also indicated, The Unit Manager will review the resident flow record daily and compose a list of those residents having not had a BM [bowel movement] in three (3)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided catheter care appropriately for 1 (Resident (R)69) of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care.Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, revised 09/2014 revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The policy revealed, Steps in the Procedure included, 13. With nondominant hand separate the labia of the female resident or retract the foreskin of the uncircumcised male resident. Maintain the position of this hand throughout the procedure; 14. Assess the urethral meatus; and 15. For a female resident: Use a washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse the labia. Use one area of the washcloth for each downward, cleansing stroke. Change the position of the washcloth with each downward stroke. Next, change the position of the washcloth and cleanse around the urethral meatus. Do not allow the washcloth to drag on the resident's skin or bed linen. With a clean washcloth, rinse with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record accurately reflected the removal of a lidocaine patch ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident (R)62) of 3 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Charting and Documentation, revised 07/2017, revealed, 3. Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted R62 on 12/24/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included but was not limited to a diagnosis of muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/27/2026, revealed R62 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated R62 received a scheduled pain medication regimen. Review of R62's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 04/01/2026, revealed an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.Correct serving sized utensils were used to ensure portion sizes at meals, which had the potential for all residents who received food from the kitchen to have unmet food intakes and potentially to have weight loss. 2. Resident (R)65 received the appropriate texture food (pureed) for dysphagia which had the potential for the resident to choke. Findings include: During an observation on 04/08/25 between 11:50 AM and 12:30 PM, of the meal service, [NAME] (C) 1 was observed plating food to be served to residents. The preplanned menu identified the meal included sliced pork roast, mashed potatoes, and green beans. C1 was observed using the same size scoops for the mashed potatoes, the green beans, and altered textured foods that had been prepared as well. The regular diets were served one slice of pork roast. During an interview on 04/08/25 at 11:55 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) was asked for the menu spread sheets and or menu…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner, failed to ensure foods were dated and failed to ensure the equipment storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 81 of 82 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1.During the initial tour completed on 04/07/25 between 9:20 AM and 9:50 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) the following observations were noted: Diet Aide (DA) 1, was working in the dish room assisting with washing and stacking dishes. DA1 had a beard and a ponytail, neither were covered with a hair restraint. During an interview on 04/07/25 at 9:25 AM, DA1 confirmed he should be wearing hair restraints. 2.During an observation with the DM on 04/07/25 at 9:30 AM, a box of Mighty Shakes was found on a shelf in the walk-in refrigerator, the box was dated 03/11/25. The DM said the Might Shakes are delivered to the facility frozen, and are thawed in the refrigerator and then had a shelf life of 21 days after removing them from the freezer. When asked what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders for three of three residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident (R)13, R24 and R76) out of 23 sampled residents. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs and at risk for respiratory complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revealed .Steps in the Procedure .5. Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered . 1.Review of R13's admission Record revealed R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of R13's Orders revealed O2 [oxygen] @ [at] 2liters via NC [nasal cannula] every shift . dated for 02/07/25. Review of R13's Care Plan revealed a focus initiated on 02/19/25 of End of Life: Resident requires Hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-12-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $289K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC