Stone River Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.24 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2020-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation, observation and interview, the facility failed to eliminate a foreseeable and known accident hazard in the resident's environment for 1 (#13) of 4 residents who were assessed at risk for falls. The facility's noncompliance placed Resident #13 in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairement or death to a resident). The Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 1/8/2020 at 1:05 PM in her office. F-689 was cited at a scope and severity of J which was Substandard Quality of Care. An extended survey was conducted on 1/8/2020. The Immediate Jeopardy was effective on 1/8/2020. An acceptable Immediate Action Removal Plan which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy was received on 1/8/2020 at 8:10 PM and corrective actions were validated on site by the surveyors on 1/8/2020. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, emergency menu, emergency supply inventory sheet, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine maintained the correct chemical sanitization concentration and failed to maintain an emergency supply of pureed (food that has been blended into a smooth, creamy, paste consistency) food. The facility had a census of 55 with 52 residents receiving trays, 6 of these residents receiving pureed food. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Dishmachine [dish machine] Use, dated 4/2006, revealed .Food Service staff required to operate the dishmachine will be trained in all steps of dishmachine use by the supervisor or a designee proficient in all aspects of proper use and sanitation.Dishmachine chemical sanitizer concentrations should be between 50-100 ppm [parts per million].If water temperatures or chemical sanitation concentrations do not meet requirements, cease use of dishmachine immediately until temperatures or PPM are adjusted. Review of the facility policy titled, Emergency Food Supply, dated 4/2021,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to honor food preferences for 2 of 16 (Resident #6 and Resident #26) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Food Preferences, dated 2001, revealed . Nursing/dietary staff will document the resident's food and eating preferences on the diet order and/or meal ticket . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #15 was coded for receiving a therapeutic diet. Review of the Care Plan dated 11/16/2025, revealed .Resident has a diagnosis of diabetes and is at risk for complications manifested by hyperglycemia.Dietary referral as indicated . Review of the Progress Note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, Closed Account Summary Report, Resident Statement Landscape, and canceled check review, revealed the facility failed to refund the personal funds deposited with the facility to the resident's estate within 30 days upon the death for 4 of 4 (Resident #72, Resident #73, Resident #74 and Resident #75) sampled residents. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Trust Fund, dated [DATE], revealed .The facility Administrator will be responsible for establishing and maintaining a system that assures a full, complete, and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf .Upon death or discharge of a resident with a personal fund account, the facility will convey within 30 days the resident's funds and a final accounting of those funds . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, signed written statements, and interview, the facility failed to report a staff to resident allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #6) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Plan, revised 10/24/2022, revealed, The facility has a zero-tolerance policy for abuse .physical abuse .is prohibited .The facility shall attempt to identify and shall investigate any reported violation or allegation of abuse .'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury .or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish .'Physical Abuse' includes .slapping .'Alleged violation' is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor, another healthcare provider, or others but has not yet been investigated .The policy of this facility is that reports of abuse .are promptly and thoroughly investigated .The investigation shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the abuse coordinator for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Plan dated 10/24/2022 revealed .Employees must always report any allegation of abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to their supervisor. The supervisor shall notify the Director of Nursing and/or the Administrator . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances, Speech Disorder, and a Personal History of Nutritional and Metabolic Disease. Review of the undated care plan revealed Resident #2 was care planned for .At risk for malnutrition, mechanically altered diet . Continued review revealed one of the interventions was .Allow adequate time to eat; provide cues; encouragement, and assistance . Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to date refrigerated perishable foods. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary Foods revised 7/12/2021, revealed, .left over foods are stored in appropriate containers so that the interior temperature of food chills quickly to < 41 F. They are covered, labeled and dated . Observation in the dietary department freezer with the Registered Dietician on 10/4/2021 at 9:28 AM, confirmed 4 hamburger patties, one bag of cauliflower, two bags of mixed vegtables and 2 bags of potatoes not dated. Observation in the dietary department refrigerator with the Registered Dietician on 10/4/2021 at 9:33 AM, confirmed a large opened jar of mayonaise not dated. During an interview on 10/4/2021 at 12:28 PM, the Dietary Manager stated he expected left over unused food items to be dated.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #168, #169, #170, and #171) as evidenced by no posted signage and no appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not available on the 14 day observation unit and staff did not wear appropriate PPE while in observation rooms. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Response Plan and Facility Policy & Protocol, dated March 5, 2020, revealed, .Any patient admitted to the facility, regardless of their admitting diagnoses will be placed in Transmission-Based Precautions in a separate observation area, for at least 14 days after admission .Required Transmission Based Precautions: The type of isolation used Standard Precautions, Contact Precautions, Airborne or Droplet Precautions and Eye Protection. The required PPE is a gown, gloves, N95 face mask, goggles or a face shield . Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview the facility failed to implement a care plan for 2 of 27 sampled resident (Resident #18) reviewed for advanced directive code status and (Resident #30) reviewed for nutritional status for weight loss. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 3/25/2021, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive care plan will be revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Atrial Fibrillation, Type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-10-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for Transmission Based Precautions for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #29 and Resident #32) on Transmission Based Precautions. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Verbal Order Policy, dated 5/20/2021, revealed, .Physician orders may be received by telephone, by a licensed nurse or other licensed or registered health care specialist who are legally authorized to do so .Enter the order into the medical record manually or electronically . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Diabetes Mellitus, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Breast, and Urinary Tract Infection. Review of Resident #29's Physician Orders Sheet dated September 2021, revealed no order for Transmission Based crecautions. Review of Resident #29's lab report dated 9/27/2021,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-10-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to have a complete medical record for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #66) reviewed for closed records. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Pneumonia, Hepatic Failure, Coagulation Defect, Alcoholic Cirrhosis, Esophageal Varices, Acute Kidney Failure and Respiratory Failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) dated [DATE], revealed, .Resuscitate (CPR) [Cardiopulmonary Resuscitate] . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was discharged from the hospital on [DATE]. Continued review revealed Resident #66's care was discussed by the hospital physician and the resident decided to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN