No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lacamas Creek Post Acute

740 NE Dallas Street, Camas, WA 98607 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 83 certified beds · (360) 834-5055 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 834-5055 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3240 NE 3rd Ave · (360) 838-2440 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
212 NE 4th Ave · (877) 797-2334 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
322 NE Cedar St · (360) 210-5921 · Call to confirm hours
Park
120 NE 17th Ave · (360) 834-5307 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.5%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.4%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.2%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.6%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.0%13.4%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 229 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.4%CMS range 51.2–63.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.0–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.8–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
53.8%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 76.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported timely for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) sampled residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for potential physical abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, showed All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following hospitalization. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/29/2025, indicated that Resident 1 was cognitively intact.Review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that trauma informed care was integrated into the care plan for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) sampled residents reviewed for trauma informed care. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving mental health (MH) interventions that therapeutically supported the resident and could lead to a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Policy entitled Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care, dated August 2022, showed Trauma-informed care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of trauma. A trauma-informed approach to care delivery recognizes the widespread impact and signs and symptoms of trauma in residents, and incorporates knowledge about trauma into care plans, policies, procedures and practices to avoid re-traumatization.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following hospitalization. The Quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a need to alter treatment significantly, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for change in condition. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of continued pain, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (an assessment tool), dated 08/04/2025, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a cognitive assessment) of 00/15 indicating, severe impairment. Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) Medical Diagnosis list included congestive heart failure (a weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs), chronic osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease leading to breakdown of cartilage in joints), and unspecified cognitive impairment. Record review, completed on 10/07/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain daily weights, for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), with diagnosis of heart failure. This failure placed the residents at risk of worsening heart failure, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (an assessment tool), dated 08/04/2025, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Medical Diagnosis list included congestive heart failure (a weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs), chronic osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease leading to breakdown of cartilage in joints), and unspecified cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident 1's physicians' order, dated 7/30/2025, documented, Daily Weights: Weigh resident in the morning before breakfast and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with completing the advance directives (AD); and obtaining and maintaining Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) documentation for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 27) reviewed for ADs. This failure placed residents at a potential risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored.Findings included.Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 05/29/2025, showed Resident 27 was alert and oriented. Record review of Resident 27's Social History Assessment, dated 11/26/2024, documented Resident 27 was their own responsible/legal guardian, had a Living Will and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR).Record review of Resident 27's electronic record did not have documentation the advanced directive had been reviewed on a quarterly basis.In an interview on 07/24/2025 at 9:51 AM, Staff E, Social Services Director, stated advanced directives were reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 27) reviewed for constipation. This failure to initiate interventions placed residents at risk of discomfort, experiencing health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Record review of the facility policy, titled, Bowel Protocol, dated February 2019, showed it was the facility policy to monitor and provide interventions to ensure routine bowel elimination by residents of the facility. At the beginning of each shift the Licensed Nurse would pull the resident bowel management report and identify residents that had not had a bowel movement for three days. The Licensed Nurse would review the residents Medication Administration Record to determine if the as needed bowel protocol had been initiated by the previous shift. Residents that did not have a bowel movement for three days would be given Milk of Magnesia (medication to help with constipation). If there was no bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when providing wound care for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 28) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for potential infection and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/09/2025, documented Resident 28 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent for activities of daily living. Record review of Resident 28's electronic health record, titled, UNITED WOUND HEALING Wound, Ostomy, Lymphedema, Burn, and Dermatological Medicine, dated 06/18/2025, documented Resident 28 had an unstageable bilateral sacrococcyx [tail bone] pressure ulcer.Record review of Resident 28's physician's order, dated 07/02/2025, documented, Wound care: Bilateral sacrococcyx c/f [concerning/for] terminal skin failure - Cleanse wound with NS [Normal Saline]/Wound cleanser and gauze -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected residents' health status and/or care needs for 3 of 21 sampled residents (39, 41, & 59) reviewed for assessment accuracy. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 07/14/2024, showed Resident 39 was moderately cognitively impaired and was not receiving hospice care. Review of Resident 39's physician orders, dated 07/09/2024, documented, Admit for Hospice End of Life Care. Review of Resident 39's care plan documented, The resident has a terminal prognosis r/t [related to] acute kidney failure with no further treatment wanted. Hospice/comfort care only . Date Initiated: 07/09/2024 . On 09/23/2024 at 3:55 PM, Resident 39 said she was on hospice. On 09/27/2024 at 10:08 AM, Staff C,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure bowel interventions were initiated for 2 of 6 sampled residents (5 & 32) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per Facility Bowel Management Policy, entitled Bowel Protocol, updated 02/2019: 1. At the beginning of each shift (based on an eight-hour shift), the Licensed Nurse will pull the Resident Bowel Management Report and identify residents that have not had a BM for 3 days. (please run the report for last 7 days and check the box Include residents regardless of Bowel Alert Status). The Licensed Nurse will review the residents MAR to determine if the PRN Bowel Protocol had been initiated by the previous shift. Bowel movements are charted every shift by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). 2. Residents who have not had a bowel movement in three days will be given Milk of Magnesia. 4. If no bowel movement by the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews for 1 of 2 sampled Nursing Assistants (NA) (Staff G) whose personnel and training record were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving care from unskilled staff. Finding included . Staff G, NA, was hired on 03/29/2014. Staff G's personnel records did not have a Performance Evaluation for the previous year. On 09/26/2024 at 3:40 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said she was not able to locate a performance evaluation for Staff G. Staff A said performance evaluations should be completed annually. Reference WAC 388-97-1680 (2)(b)(i) .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement in a manner that residents understood for 2 of 3 sampled residents (28 & 46) reviewed for arbitration agreement. This failure placed residents at risk of forfeiting their right to a trial without consent, lack of adequate resolution of violation of rights and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 28 signed the Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement on 02/16/2024. On 09/27/2024 at 1:51 PM, Resident 28 said she did not recall signing the arbitration agreement document. Resident 28 said her daughter handled that kind of stuff. 2) Resident 46 signed the Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement on 09/10/2024. On 09/27/2024 at 1:38 PM, Resident 46 said she did not recall signing such a document and said her sister was her Power of Attorney (POA). At 1:58 PM, Collateral Contact 1 (CC1), POA, said Resident 46 should not be signing legal documents because she did not know what she was signing. CC1 said Resident 46 had gotten herself into trouble because people had taken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were securely fastened to the bed and without gaps between the mattress and bed rails for 1 of 3 sampled residents (22) reviewed resident beds. This failure placed residents at risk for injury. Findings included . Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/28/2024, indicated Resident 22 was moderately cognitively impaired. The bed rail care plan, revised 08/29/2024, indicated, bilateral ¼ side rails to aid in bed mobility and to increase independence. On 09/23/2024 at 2:46 PM, Resident 22's left side bed rail was observed to be loose. The bed rail had approximately 9 to 10 inches of movement. On 09/27/2024 at 8:50 AM, Resident 22's left side bed rail was observed to be loose. The bed rail had approximately 9 to 10 inches of movement. At 8:57 AM, Staff I, Resident Care Manager and Registered Nurse, said the nursing assistants and floor nurses were supposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff received Dementia training for 1 of 5 sampled staff (F) reviewed for staff in-service trainings. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving necessary care from unskilled staff. Findings included . Staff G, Nursing Assistant, was hired on 03/29/2014. Provided training or in-service training records did not show Dementia training was completed over the past year. On 09/26/2024 at 2:51 PM, Staff H, Staff Training Coordinator, said dementia training was covered in the new employee orientation and then annually. An email from Staff A, Administrator, dated 09/30/2024 at 9:49 AM, noted, Staff G should've had it [dementia training] as she's been a long standing employee so that is an error on us. Reference WAC 388-97-1680(2)(b) .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered in accordance with provider orders for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions, a change in health condition and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Medication Administration-Errors, dated 11/2004 and revised 02/2019, noted, Policy: It is the policy of this facility that practices will be in place to ensure . 2. Residents are free of any significant medication errors . Medications will be prepared and administered in accordance with: 1. Physicians orders . 3. Accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food preparation dishes were properly cleaned and air dried to provide safe, sanitary food preparation when the kitchen was reviewed for sanitization and storage. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 10/23/2023 at 10:30 AM, observations showed a rack of food preparation dishes including wet quarter pans and wet 6-inch pans stacked on top of each other; stacking of the wet pans would not allow for required air drying. Additionally, two quarter pans were noted to have food debris in the bottom and on the sides of the dish. At 10:45 AM, Staff U, Food and Nutrition Services Manager, observed the stacked wet food preparation dishes and the food debris in the dishes and said that the dishes in the rack were supposed to be clean and dry. Staff U said that the dishes were quarter pans and 6-inch pans, and they were used for food preparation for resident meals. Reference WAC 388-97-1100 (3), -2980 .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative describing the reason for transfers for 9 of 13 sampled residents (2, 4, 10, 26, 48, 316, 318, 319 & 320) reviewed for transfer notifications regarding hospitalization. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being informed of the resident's condition, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/14/2023 documented Resident 2 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a transfer to an acute-care hospital on [DATE] and 08/11/2023. Resident 2's EMR did not show documentation a written notice of transfer was provided to Resident 2 or their representative for the 05/16/2023 and 08/11/2023 transfers. Resident 2's eINTERACT forms, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice to the resident and/or the resident's representative at the time of transfer to the hospital for 9 of 13 sampled residents (2, 4, 10, 316, 318, 319, 320, 26 & 48) reviewed for bed hold notifications. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being informed regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . 1) Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/14/2023, documented Resident 2 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a transfer to an acute-care hospital on [DATE] and 08/11/2023. Resident 2's EMR did not show documentation a written bed hold was provided to Resident 2 or their representative for the transfers listed above. 2) Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were individualized to promote the highest physical, emotional and psychosocial well-being and failed to ensure an anticoagulant care plan was in place for 4 of 7 sampled residents (2, 4, 8 & 45) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a negative impact on their quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/14/2023, documented Resident 2 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident 2's Care Plan, dated 09/26/2023, showed interventions requiring editing, as indicated by the word SPECIFY within the Care Plan, had not been edited with individualized resident information. The care plan did not show individualized interventions. 2) Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 4 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an activity program to meet individual resident needs for 3 of 3 sampled residents (26, 17 & 51) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk for becoming bored and depressed when not provided meaningful engagement throughout the day, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A facility policy, entitled Activity Assessment and Documentation, dated January 2012 and revised March 2019, documented, The AD [Activity Director]/designee assures that participation records are completed for each resident as well as level of engagement . All participation records will be kept according to state regulation. PCC [an electronic medical record program]: Participation records are recorded and stored in EHR [electronic health record]. 1) Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/25/2023, documented the resident was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility's activity program was directed by a trained and qualified activities professional for the ongoing assessment, development, and/or revision of individualized activity programs for the current activities scheduled in the facility for 1 of 1 Activity Directors (Staff G) reviewed for activities professional qualifications. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet recreation needs, boredom, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The Activities Director Position Description, dated July 2022, documented, Qualifications and Experience: Must meet certification requirements by the local and state regulations. Minimum of two years' experience in social or recreation programming for seniors. The position description documented under educational requirements, Associates Degree or equivalent knowledge and skills obtained through a combination of education, training, and experience. Review of Staff G's (Activity Director) application for Activity Director, dated 02/01/2023, did not show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff responded to call lights in a timely manner to provide necessary care and services for 1 of 5 halls (300). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 10/24/2023 at 8:05 AM, Resident 31 said it had taken staff almost two hours to respond to his call light. At 8:26 AM, Resident 41 said it could take up to one hour on the day and night shift for staff to respond to call lights. On 10/25/2023 at 8:20 AM, the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed 1 was initiated. At 8:22 AM, the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed 2 was initiated. At 9:06 AM, an unidentified Laundry Aide was observed going into room [ROOM NUMBER], about 44 minutes after the call light was initiated. At 9:10 AM, an unidentified Nursing Assistant (NA) was observed going into room [ROOM NUMBER], about 50 minutes after the call light was initiated. When the NA came out of the room, she went to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide daily nurse monitoring for side effects of anticoagulant use in 3 of 3 sampled residents (2, 8 & 46) reviewed for unnecessary medications related to anticoagulant use. This failure placed residents at risk of unidentified adverse side effects, poor outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/14/2023, showed Resident 2 was taking an anticoagulant daily. Review of anticoagulant care plan, dated 09/26/2023, showed Resident 2 started Eliquis (an anticoagulant) on 09/10/2022. Staff were to monitor for signs and symptoms of increased bleeding. Review of Resident 2's electronic medical record did not show daily nurse monitoring for side effects. 2) Resident 8 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, difficulty expressing himself with verbal communication, and dementia. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication refrigerator temperature logs were consistently maintained in 2 of 2 sampled medication rooms and failed to ensure a multi-dose vial of PPD (purified protein derivative, a medication used in a skin test to diagnose tuberculosis, a contagious disease) was labeled appropriately with an open date for 1 of 2 sampled medications refrigerators (100 Hall Med Room) reviewed for medication storage. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications with unknown potency. Findings included . The facility policy, entitled Storage of Medication, dated January 2023, documented, A temperature log or tracking mechanism is maintained to verify that temperature remained within accepted limits. The temperature of any refrigerator that stores vaccines should be monitored and recorded twice daily. The facility policy, entitled Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated January 2023, documented, the nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff properly wore N-95 masks for 1 of 4 nurses (Staff O) on the evening shift; preformed hand hygiene and implement hygienic use of gloves, and adhered to transmission-based precautions on 5 of 5 halls (Halls 100, 200, 300, 400 & 500) reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents, staff and visitor at risk of contracting an infectious disease, developing infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . During the survey, 10/23/2023 to 10/27/2023, the facility was on outbreak status for COVID-19 (a highly contagious virus that can cause severe illness including death). A sign posted at the entrance of the facility documented staff were to wear a N-95 mask (respirator that protects against COVID-19). <Mask Usage> On 10/23/2023 at 10:17 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse (RN), said they had eight residents in the facility who were positive for COVID. On 10/25/2023 at 6:57 PM, Staff O,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a pest free environment for 1 of 5 halls (400 Hall) reviewed for a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This failure placed residents at risk of infectious disease and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . On 10/23/2023 at 10:00 AM, during the screening of residents and general tour, black house flies were observed in two resident rooms on 400 Hall, on top of the residents' blankets that were covering un-named residents. On 10/26/2023 at 1:06 PM, five gnats were observed in/on/around a cup of grape juice in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident 51 said he sometimes tried to trap them on his meal tray to send them out of his room. Resident 51 said he would prefer to not have them in his room. Resident 51 said the gnats were on the window. At 1:07 PM, Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant, said she saw gnats in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff K said she tried to get all the food out of resident rooms and wipe the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure electronic discharged Minimum Data Set (MDS), a required assessment tool, were submitted to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required time frame for 1 of 1 sampled resident (53) reviewed for resident assessment. This failure placed residents at risk of not have an accurate assessment in place. Findings included . The Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Census, showed Resident 53 discharged from the facility on 06/15/2023. The admission None PPS (prospective payment systems), MDS, dated [DATE], showed it was accepted. The discharged Return Not Anticipated/End of PPS Part A Stay, MDS, was completed on 06/15/2023; and did not show it was accepted by CMS. On 10/26/2023 at 3:31 PM, Staff E, Resident Care Manager and Licensed Practical Nurse, said the discharge MDS did not have to be transmitted to CMS because Resident 53 had an HMO (private insurance). Staff E said the MDS was done for the facility's records and thought the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, an assessment used to ensure individuals with serious mental illness, intellectual or developmental disabilities and/or related conditions receive appropriate placement and services) assessment was completed to reflect accurate mental health diagnoses and failed to obtain a Level 1 PASARR 30 days after an exempted hospital discharge for 2 of 5 sampled residents (41 & 26) reviewed for PASARR. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 26's PASARR, dated [DATE], documented, No Level II evaluation indicated at this time due to exempted hospital discharge; Level II must be completed if scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include residents and/or their representative in care conferences and having input into care decisions for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 51) reviewed for care plan revisions. This failure placed residents at risk of not being fully informed about care decisions, not being able to provide input about care and treatment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 09/11/2023, showed Resident 51 was moderately cognitively impaired, participated in the MDS assessment, and his representative did not participate. Review of electronic medical record showed the last documented care conference was 03/16/2023. Documentation was not available to show the resident or his representative were offered or declined the care conference for care plans created in June and September 2023. On 10/24/2023 at 9:45 AM, Resident 51 did not recall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care with activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents including fingernail care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (26) reviewed for ADLs. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed for which they were unable to perform themselves. Findings included . Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/25/2023, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene ADLs. Resident 26's fingernail care record, dated April 2023 to October 2023, did not show documentation of a fingernail trimming for over six months. On 10/23/2023 at 3:17 PM, Resident 26 was observed with fingernails approximately ½ inch long, with dark debris noted under the fingernails of the right hand. On 10/25/2023 at 1:01 PM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant, said Resident 26 required a lot of assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bowel interventions were initiated and failed to ensure resident weight gain was reported to the physician as ordered for 2 of 6 sampled residents (60 & 4) reviewed for quality of care related to bowel management and weight gain. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, health complications and a diminished quality of life. Finding included . 1) The facility's policy entitled Bowel Protocol, revised 02/19, documented, 1. At the beginning of each shift [eight-hour shift], the Licensed Nurse will pull the Resident Bowel Management Report and identify resident that have not had a BM [Bowel Movement] for 3 days . The Licensed Nurse will review the residents MAR [medication administration record] to determine if the PRN [as needed] Bowel Protocol had been initiated by the previous shift. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/10/2023, showed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement strategies for pressure ulcer prevention including turning and repositioning, air mattress, and zinc cream for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 51) reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This failure placed residents at a high risk for recurrence of a recently closed pressure ulcer. Findings included . Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/11/2023, showed Resident 51 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance by two staff for bed mobility, had not transferred out of bed during the look back period, and was assessed to be at risk for developing a pressure ulcer. Review of electronic medical records showed Resident 51 had a Stage 4 (a pressure injury that extends to muscle, tendon or bone) in April 2023. Treatment orders included an air mattress overlay and a topical zinc cream to be applied to the sacrum (low back). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was monitored and sanitary for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 17) reviewed for respiratory services. This failure placed residents at risk for unsanitary oxygen equipment, respiratory infections and a poor quality of life. Findings included . Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (airflow blockage and breathing related problems). The annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/03/2023, showed Resident 17 was able to make needs know and utilized oxygen therapy. Review of respirator care plan, dated 08/24/2022, showed staff were to Change O2 tubing, humidifier water, and clean concentrator filter per facility procedure and Check with rounds on night shift and re-place oxygen PRN (as needed). On 10/23/2023 at 3:54 PM, Resident 17 said she had recently been sick with pneumonia. The resident was observed to be wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health care and services for 1 of 1 sampled residents (41) reviewed for behavioral health services. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary services to meet their mental health needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, psychotic disorder (mental disorders characterized by disconnection from reality which results in strange behavior often accompanied by disturbances of thought and perception), and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder, mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback and avoidance of similar situations). The 5-day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/24/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 07/26/2023, documented, Psych…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting the mind) medications by failing to monitor for target behaviors for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 10/20/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact. A physicians' order, dated 07/13/2023, documented Resident 4 was prescribed Citalopram (an antidepressant). Resident 4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) did not show documentation of antidepressant medication target behavior monitoring. A physicians' order, dated 08/31/2023, documented Resident 4 was prescribed Quetiapine (an antipsychotic). Resident 4's EHR did not show documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine was offered in a timely manner to 1 of 5 sampled residents (26) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed residents at risk for developing pneumonia with potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/25/2023, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 26's pneumococcal vaccine consent, dated 02/17/2023, documented the resident consented to the administration of the PPSV23 vaccine, a type of pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. Resident 26's medical record did not document administration of any pneumococcal vaccine. On 10/26/2023 at 10:46 AM, Staff E, Residential Care Manager and Licensed Practical Nurse, said Resident 26 had a pneumonia vaccine that was set to be given on 10/27/2023, 252 days after consent for the vaccine was obtained. Staff E said usually vaccines were given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) for residents dependent on staff assistance were provided related to bathing for 8 of 11 sampled residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8) reviewed for ADLs for dependent residents. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), a comprehensive assessment tool, dated 07/27/2023, documented the resident required 1 to 2-person extensive assistance with ADLs including 1-person total dependence with bathing. The facility shower schedule, undated, documented Resident 1 was scheduled for 2 showers a week. On 09/07/2023 at 12:18 PM, Resident 1 said she gets an average of one bed bath a week. Resident 1 said she does not feel clean and feels undignified. Resident 1 said she would like to have at least 2 bed baths a week. The bath report documented Resident 1 received 6 of 8 bath or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.5+2.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/14/2024
PACS GROUP, INC.OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/14/2024
PACS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/14/2024
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
KALINOWSKI, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
ORLOVSKAYA, OLGAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
VAN AUKEN, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 16%Other / private 34%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$474per resident / day
operating cost
$14,410per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$465per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next