No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

South Creek Post Acute

917 South Scheuber Road, Centralia, WA 98531 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 128 certified beds · (360) 736-9384 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 736-9384 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$8,278 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1000 S Scheuber Rd · (360) 330-8950 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1129 Harrison Ave · (360) 330-5229 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway1.2 mi
1129 Harrison Ave · (360) 330-0884 · Call to confirm hours
Park
902 Johnson Rd · (360) 330-7662 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2400 Cooks Hill Rd · (360) 736-6133

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.2%17.7%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.2%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.5%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.7%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.9%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.5%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.461.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.331.521.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 319 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.2%CMS range 56.1–66.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 8.2–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge83.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 4.2–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
55.0%
Total nursing turnover
61.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 100.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-11)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-12-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain ordered laboratory services for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for laboratory services. Resident 1 experienced harm when physician ordered CBC (complete blood count, a lab used in part to determine levels of red blood cells in blood) and BMP labs (basic metabolic panel, a blood test that checks the levels of different substances in your blood including sodium) were not obtained timely for physician evaluation and the resident required transport to the hospital and admission to the intensive care unit where they were diagnosed with profound anemia (low red blood cells) and hyponatremia (low levels of sodium in the blood). Findings included.Record review of the facility policy, titled, Request for Diagnostic Services, dated April 2007, showed, Orders for diagnostic services will be promptly carried out as instructed by the physician's order.Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-day admission Minimum Data Set, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for a resident assessed to be a high elopement risk for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for care plans. This failure placed residents at risk of elopement, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 03/19/2026, documented the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident 2's elopement risk evaluation, dated 03/13/2026, documented the resident was at high risk of elopement. Record review of Resident 2's physician notes, dated 03/15/2026, documented, [Resident 2] was considered an elopement risk. Record review of Resident 2's facility investigation, dated 04/20/2026, documented the resident eloped from the facility and traveled to a relative's house. Record review of Resident 2's comprehensive care plan documented an elopement care plan was initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to answer a call light in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for call light response time. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The discharge minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 04/15/2026, documented the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident 1's facility investigation, dated 04/10/2026, documented, The resident reported that his call light was not answered for approximately 1.5 to 2 hours. The resident expressed concern regarding the delay in response to his request for assistance. The resident statement documented, Pushed my call light during breakfast to get assistance for toileting and it took 1.5 to 2 hours to come assist me. Record review of facility's call light report, dated 04/10/2026, documented Resident 1's call light was activated on 04/10/2026 at 6:22 AM. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and/or neglect to the State Survey Agency within required timeframes. This allegation involved 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident 1) reviewed for reporting requirements. This failure placed residents at risk for unassessed and unaddressed potential abuse and neglect. Findings included . The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, stated if resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The policy defined immediately as within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or resulting in serious bodily injury. The policy further required that all allegations are thoroughly investigated and documented. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse and/or neglect within required timeframes. This allegation involved 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident 1) reviewed for investigative requirements. This failure placed residents at risk for unassessed and unaddressed allegations of abuse and potential ongoing harm. Findings included . The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, stated all allegations are thoroughly investigated. The policy further stated the administrator initiates investigations upon receipt of an allegation and ensures investigations are documented. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a chronic lung condition that affects breathing) and opioid dependence. On 01/27/2026 at 2:10 PM, Staff A, Administrator, was notified of an allegation involving Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff received dementia training for 5 of 28 sampled staff (Staff H, I, J, K & L) reviewed for staff in-service trainings. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from untrained staff.Findings included .Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was hired on 08/01/2024. The Relias (electronic learning center for staff training) transcript, the Training Sign In Sheets and Continuing Education Certificates for Staff H, did not show documentation of dementia training since date of hire.Staff I, CNA, was hired on 03/18/2025. The Relias transcript, the Training Sign In Sheets and Continuing Education Certificates for Staff I did not show documentation of dementia training since date of hire.Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was hired on 01/31/2025. The Relias transcript, the Training Sign In Sheets and Continuing Education Certificates for Staff J did not show documentation of dementia training since date of hire.Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was hired on 12/16/2025. The Relias…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard expired food items for 1 of 1 meal preparation (lunch) observed and failed to ensure resident refrigerator temperatures were checked and/or logged daily for 1 of 3 resident snack refrigerators (North Refrigerator) reviewed for food services. These failures placed residents at risk of consuming expired food goods, food-borne illness, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Expired Food In an observation on 02/09/2026 at 11:43 AM, during lunch preparation service, two 8-ounce cartons of Sysco [brand] Thickened Dairy Drink were observed on a food tray, sitting on top of the steam table food counter, along with a stack of napkins for the residents' lunch trays. The expiration date observed on the Thickened Dairy Drink showed, 05NOV2025 [November 05, 2025] best if used by. In an interview and observation on 02/09/2026 at 12:34 PM, Staff D, Dietary Director, said she would check expiration dates when she completed food orders and put away food items on Mondays and Fridays. When asked about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to convey the trust account funds for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 115) reviewed for trust funds. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for loss of funds. Findings included.Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 115 expired on [DATE].Record review of the facility's trust funds statement titled, Resident Statement Landscape, from [DATE] to [DATE], indicated Resident 115 had a balance of $7.94. As of [DATE], 216 days after Resident 115 expired, Resident 115's account had not been closed. In an interview on [DATE] at 1:17PM, Staff M, Business Office Manager, said trust accounts were supposed to be conveyed no longer than 30 days after discharge or death. Staff M said as of [DATE] Resident 115's account had not been closed. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:30 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said Resident 115's final funds should have been disbursed within 30 days of discharge, but they were not. Reference WAC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 20) were free from physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk of injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Admission's Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/03/2026, indicated Resident 20 was alert and oriented.During an interview and observation on 02/06/2026 at 9:18AM, Resident 20 was observed to have bilateral bedrails. When asked about the bedrails Resident 20 said they were for mobility. Record review of Resident 20's electronic health records (EHR) did not show an assessment, consent or an order for bedrails.During an interview on 02/10/2026 at 3:00 PM, Staff F, Resident Care Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse said before a resident got bedrails they would do an evaluation, get consent and get an order. When asked if Resident 20 had an evaluation, consent and an order Staff F said she could not find any of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 8) reviewed for constipation. This failure to initiate interventions placed residents at risk of discomfort, experiencing health complications and a diminished quality of life.Finding included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bowel Protocol, dated 02/09/2026, showed, it is the policy of this facility to monitor and provide interventions to ensure routine bowl [sp] elimination by residents of this facility. Physician orders will be obtained for implementation of facility bowel care protocol unless an alternate bowel care regimen is ordered by the physician.At the beginning of each shift (based on an eight-hour shift), the Licensed Nurse will pull the Resident Bowel Management Report and identify resident that have not had a BM (bowel movement) for 3 days (please run the report for the last 7 days and check the box 'Include residents regardless of Bowel Alert Status'. The Licensed Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure medications in 2 of 2 residents' rooms (Resident 50 & 67) reviewed for medication access and storage. This failure placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for accessing unauthorized medication, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Self Administration of Medication, dated 09/01/2024, revised 02/09/2026, documented, .Medication at bedside is stored in closed, locked cupboards or drawers. This includes over-the-counter medications. 2. the RCM evaluates the resident's ability to self-administer medications using the Self Administration Evaluation form. No medications are stored at bedside nor self-administered until evaluation is complete. 3. A physician order is obtained indicating the specific medications that the resident is able to self-administer. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications ordered by a provider were administered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk of delayed healing, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 10/22/2025, documented the resident had a wound infection and was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident 1's Antibiotic Medication Care Plan, dated 11/11/2025, documented the intervention, Administer medication as ordered. Record review of Resident 1's Providence Swedish Infectious Disease Clinic Provider Orders, dated 10/15/2025 at 10:05 AM, documented, Meropenem [an antibiotic] 1g [gram] IV [Intravenously] every 8 hours. Record review of Resident 1's Providence Swedish progress note, dated 10/07/2025 and sent to the facility on [DATE], documented, Recommended patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for facility investigations. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/25/2025, documented the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident 1's smoking care plan, dated 07/10/2025, documented the intervention, Supervision provided while resident is smoking. Record review of Resident 1's smoking assessment, dated 07/10/2025, documented, Patient is unable to safely get to smoking area independently and has cognitive impairment. Patient is unable to safely smoke independently. Record review of Resident 1's fall investigation, dated 07/12/2025, documented, NAC [Nursing Assistant Certified] assisted resident outside to watch patient smoke. NAC witnessed resident slide out of wheelchair,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure vital signs were obtained upon admission to the facility and before administration of a blood pressure medication for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for vital signs monitoring. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Record review of the facility policy, Admitting the Resident: Role of the Nursing Assistant, dated September 2013, documented, The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record. The resident's vital signs. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/15/2025, documented the resident was cognitively intact. The resident discharged from the facility on 06/15/2025. Record review of Resident 1's physician's order, dated 06/16/2025, documented, [check] Blood Pressure weekly prior to giving antihypertensive [blood pressure] medication. Notify MD [Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was in compliance with state and local laws and regulations when the facility allowed 2 of 2 sampled Nurse Technicians (Staff D and Staff E) to administer scheduled medications and IV (intravenous) medications. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . [NAME] Administrative Code 246-840-870 documented, The nursing technician is authorized only to perform specific nursing functions within the limits of their education, up to their skills and knowledge, as verified by their nursing program. The nursing technician . May not administer chemotherapy, blood or blood products, intravenous medications, scheduled drugs, nor carry out procedures on central lines. Staff D, Nurse Technician, was first credentialed as a nurse technician on [DATE]. Staff D's nurse technician credential expired on [DATE]. Staff E, Nurse Technician, was first credentialed as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or maintain Advance Directives (AD) for 2 of 20 sampled residents (59 & 65) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy entitled, Advance Directives, dated September 2022, documented, .1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. 2. The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so . 1) Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/27/2025, documented Resident 59 was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an assessment, consent, and/or physician's order regarding bed rails for 2 of 3 sampled residents (264 & 50) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk of injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy entitled, Physical Restraint Application, dated October 2010, documented, .Preparation 1. Verify physician's order for the use of restraints . 1) Resident 264 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Admission/Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/09/2025, documented Resident 264 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 264's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not show an assessment, resident and/or representative consent, or physician's order related to bed rails. On 04/08/2025 at 10:53 AM, Resident 264's bed was observed with a padded covered bed rail, about one third length of the bed, on the upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) for Level II services for 2 of 7 sampled residents (36 & 54) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health services and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per Facility policy, entitled [PASARR] Screening for Mental Disorder/Intellectual Disability, revised 01/22/2025, documented, A positive Level I Screen (PASARR Indicates that individual required PASARR Level II Referral) necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the state-designated authority PASARR Level II) which must be conducted prior to admission to a nursing facility OR upon identification that the individual may need a Level II PASARR Referral while at the Nursing Facility. 1) Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/30/2025, indicated Resident 36 was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment was completed to reflect accurate mental health diagnoses for 1 of 7 sampled residents (94) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per Facility policy, entitled [PASARR] Screening for Mental Disorder/Intellectual Disability, revised 01/22/2025, showed, 2. The PASARR process requires all individual be screened for possible serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions. The initial pre-screening [PASARR level I] should be completed prior to admission to facility. A negative level I requires no further action. Resident 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition characterized by symptoms of both schizophrenia, like delusions and hallucinations; and a mood disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered activities care plan for 1 of 6 sampled residents (97) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/06/2025, documented Resident 97 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 97's electronic health record (EHR) did not show a care plan addressing activity preferences, goals or interventions. On 04/07/2025 at 11:00 AM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed sleeping. At 12:38 PM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed sleeping. At 2:35 PM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed. On 04/09/2025 at 9:42 AM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed. On 04/10/2025 at 11:21 AM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed sleeping. At 1:01 PM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed. On 04/11/2025 at 8:54 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice with inaccurate enteral nutrition (method of providing nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract via a feeding tube) pump settings and not documenting medication administration for 1 of 1 sampled residents (101) reviewed for professional standards of practice. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The admission Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/23/2025, documented Resident 101 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. <Enternal Nutrition Pump Settings> A review of Resident 101's electronic health record (EHR) showed a physician order dated 03/28/2025, Enteral Feed Order in the evening Enteral Feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance was provided with shaving for 1 of 3 sampled residents (59) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for Dependent Residents. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, decreased self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 02/27/2025, documented Resident 59 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on assistance for personal hygiene. On 04/07/2025 at 11:45 AM, Resident 59 was observed lying in bed with thick facial hair about one quarter inch long on her upper lip and chin. Resident 59 said it bothered her when she had hair on her chin and lip. On 04/08/2025 at 10:40 AM, Resident 59 was observed with thick upper lip and chin hair about one quarter inch long. On 04/09/2025 at 8:40 AM, Resident 59 was observed with thick upper lip and chin hair present at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident centered activities incorporating the resident's preferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (97) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk of a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/06/2025, documented Resident 97 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 97's electronic health record (EHR) did not show a care plan addressing activities preferences, goals or interventions. On 04/07/2025 at 11:00 AM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed sleeping. At 12:38 PM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed sleeping. At 2:35 PM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed. On 04/09/2025 at 9:42 AM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed. On 04/10/2025 at 11:21 AM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed sleeping. At 1:01 PM, Resident 97 was observed lying in bed. On 04/11/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 6 of 7 sampled residents (37, 50, 86, 92, 102 & 105) reviewed for quality of care related to bowel management. This failure placed residents at risk for health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility's bowel policy entitled Bowel Protocol, revised on 09/2024, documented, .1. At the beginning of each shift (based on an eight-hour shift), the Licensed Nurse will pull the Resident Bowel Management Report and identify residents that have not had a BM (Bowel Movement) for 3 days. (please run the report for last 7 days and check the box Include residents regardless of Bowel Alert Status). The Licensed Nurse will review the residents MAR (medication administration record) to determine if the PRN (as needed) Bowel Protocol had been initiated by the previous shift. Bowel movements are charted every shift by CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant). 2. Unless resident is physically unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure continuous supplemental oxygen (O2) was provided for 1 of 4 sampled residents (97) reviewed for respiratory care and services. This failure placed residents at risk of discomfort, medical decline and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy entitled Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, documented, After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 3. The rate of oxygen flow, route, and rationale. 5. The reason for p.r.n. (as needed) administration . Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/06/2025, documented Resident 97 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of physician's order, dated 03/02/2025, noted, O2 @ 1-5 L(liters)/min(minute) per NC (Nasal Cannula) as needed SpO2 (oxygen saturation) < (less than) 88% as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete behavior monitoring and intervention assessments for 1 of 5 sampled residents (36) reviewed for psychotropic medications. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/30/2025, indicated Resident 36 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 36's April 2025 physician orders showed Resident 36 was taking medications for anxiety, depression, and psychosis. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident 36 did not include monitoring of behavioral symptoms or intervention for psychotropic medication use. On 04/10/2025 at 9:10 AM, Staff O, Nursing Assistant said she would look at the [NAME] to find specific information about resident behaviors and interventions. Staff O was unable to find specific behavior monitoring or interventions for Resident 36 on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled in 1 of 4 medication carts (Middle South) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving the wrong medication, adverse outcome, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy entitled, Medication Labeling and Storage, undated, documented .Medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each resident's medications are assigned to an individual cubicle, drawer, or other holding area to prevent the possibility of mixing medication of several residents. On 04/10/2025 at 11:11 AM, the Middle South medication cart was observed with Staff S, Licensed Practical Nurse. The top drawer of the medication cart contained about six or seven loose plastic medication cups with multiple unlabeled medications in each cup. The plastic medication cups had writing on them of a room number. Staff S quickly grabbed all the plastic medication cups…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they were compliant with infection prevention and control guidelines and practices when staff did not clean and disinfect shared medical equipment between resident use on 2 of 2 hallways (North & South) reviewed for infection prevention and control. This failure placed residents, staff and visitors at risk for potential infection. Findings included . On 04/09/2025 at 9:48 AM, a facility staff was observed removing a Hoyer lift (a device used to help caregivers safely transfer individuals with mobility limitations from surface to surface) from room [ROOM NUMBER] and placed it in the hallway. Staff did not disinfect the Hoyer lift. At 3:14 PM, Staff V, Nurse Assistant Registered (NAR), was observed leaving room [ROOM NUMBER] with a vital sign (VS) machine (takes blood pressure, pulse and oxygen) after using it on the resident in Bed 1. Staff V did not disinfect the machine. At 3:26 PM, Staff V was observed going back into room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were securely fastened to the bed and without gaps between the mattress and bed rail for 1 of 3 sampled resident (264) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and/or entrapment. Findings included . Resident 264 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Admission/Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/09/2025, documented Resident 264 was severely cognitively impaired. On 04/08/2025 at 10:53 AM, Resident 264's bed was observed with a padded covered bed rail, about one third length of the bed, on the upper right side of the bed. The bed rail was observed to be loose with about six to seven inches of movement back and forth, and leaning six to seven inches out from the mattress. The bracket attaching the bed rail to the bed frame was observed to be loose. On 04/09/2025 at 8:45 AM, Resident 264 was observed lying in bed. Resident 264's right side bed rail was observed to be loose.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated after a change in condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care plan revisions. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 02/19/2025, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 1's skin care plan, initiated 11/05/2024 and revised 02/20/2025, documented, Skin: Resident is at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility and activity level, length of time in dialysis chair, diabetes, and ESRD [end stage renal disease]. At risk of continued skin breakdown and infections related to multi system organ failure secondary to ESRD and Liver failure. The skin care plan did not reference a wound to the resident's genitalia (reproduction organs). A communication with provider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, after a planned hospitalization, the resident was readmitted to the facility for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for permitting residents to return to the facility. This failure placed residents at risk for increased anxiety related to being placed in an unfamiliar environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A facility policy, entitled Bed-Holds and Returns, revised October 2022, documented, The requirement that residents be permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization or therapeutic leave applies to all residents regardless of payer source. The policy noted, If the facility determines that a resident cannot return, the facility must comply with the requirements of the facility-initiated discharge. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 01/06/2025, documented the resident had a chronic ulcer to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care related to falls. This failure placed residents at risk of undiagnosed injuries, increased pain, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . A facility policy, entitled Falls-Clinical Protocol, dated March 2018, documented, The staff will evaluate and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility; for example, when and where they happen, any observations of the events, etc. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/26/2024, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required some assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident 1's progress notes, dated 12/18/2024 through 01/17/2025, were reviewed for nurses notes and assessments related to a fall on 12/31/2024. No progress notes were found related to the 12/31/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a clean, dry and sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards of cleanliness and food safety for 1 of 1 dry storage rooms and 1 of 1 juice dispensing areas reviewed for cleanliness and food safety. The failure placed residents at risk for food borne illness, ingestion of contaminated food or beverages, cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A facility policy entitled Food Receiving and Storage, undated, documented, Food services, or other designated staff, maintain clean and temperature/humidity appropriate food storage at all times. <Dry Storage Area> On 01/03/2025 at 10:55 AM, the dry storage area was observed with Staff C, Dietary Manager. There was a pink, wheeled cart in the corner of the storeroom. Under the pink cart was clear and brown liquid and approximately 2-3 square feet of a black, spotted substance on the floor and creeping up the baseboards. The floor underneath and behind the wheeled shelving, that stored food,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide repair and maintenance services for a safe and sanitary environment in 1 of 1 kitchen floors reviewed for safe and functional environment. This failure placed residents at risk for infection by not having cleanable and maintained surfaces. Findings included . On 01/03/2025 at 11:30 AM, the kitchen floor was observed with broken linoleum tiles near and around the dishwashing station and a handwashing station. Bare concrete was showing in these areas, approximately 5 square feet at the dishwashing station and approximately 2 square feet at the handwashing station. At 11:31 AM, Staff D, Maintenance Director, said he was aware of the need to replace the kitchen floor, and in the meantime placed mats down on the exposed area. On 01/07/2025 10:23 AM, Staff A, Administrator, said he had seen the broken tiles in the kitchen. Staff A said the building was purchased from the prior corporation in that condition. Staff A said the broken tiles were something that could be fixed as soon as possible. Reference WAC 388-97-3220 (1) .

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the kitchen ice machine and vent fan covers; and failed to ensure stored food and reusable items in the refrigerator, freezers and dry storage were labeled and dated when opened. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Initial Brief Tour> On 05/20/2024 at 9:23 AM, the ice machine dispenser snout was observed to have dark residue on its lower rim. The walk-in freezer had an opened Ben & Jerry's ice cream container that was not labeled and dated when it was opened. The dry storage had an opened and undated container of [NAME] Egg Shade Food Coloring. Two overhead vents were observed to have lint hanging down from them in the kitchen prep area and behind on the tray line side. <Follow-Up Visit> On 05/23/2024 at 10:53 AM, seven items were found opened and not labeled or dated during a walk through the dry storage room. At 11:05 AM, Staff K, Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a consent, evaluation assessment and physician order for 1 of 3 sampled residents (17) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's policy entitled, Physical Restraints and Enablers/Devices, revised 07/2023, documented .the Bed Rail/Bed Enabler/Device Evaluation is completed prior to the device being initiated, annually and on change of condition . Devices may include but are not limited to the following: i. Bed rails (quarter, ½, ¾ full) . The resident and/or resident representative is provided risks/benefits of restraint use or enabler/device use, and consent obtained prior to implementation of the device. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/31/2024, documented Resident 17 was severely cognitively impaired. On 05/20/2024, at 10:52 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (17) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy entitled, Physical Restraints and Enablers/Devices, revised 07/2023, documented .Devices may include but are not limited to the following: i. Bed rails (quarter, ½, ¾ full) . The care plan is updated for the device use with the goal for the least restrictive measures . The care plan is evaluated quarterly and as needed. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/31/2024, documented Resident 17 was severely cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 17's Electronic Health Record Comprehensive Care Plan did not show documentation the care plan addressed padded quarter bed rails on the left and right side of the bed. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure preventative measures for contractures were provided, and failed to provide consistent restorative services for 2 of 3 sampled residents (30 & 17) reviewed for maintaining activities of daily living (ADLs) These failures placed residents at risk for further decline and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/21/2024, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The Care Plan, initiated 01/25/2020, documented, I have left side weakness to the UE (upper extremity) and LE (lower extremity) due to history of CVA (cerebral vascular accident - a stroke) with contractures to the left hand. On 05/23/2024 at 3:21 PM, Resident 30 said she was not able to open her left hand. Staff F, Resident Care Manager (RCM) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said she did not think Resident 30's nails were digging into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide follow-up education for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) for 1 of 5 sampled resident (45) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed resident at risk of exposure to contagious diseases and an increased risk of respiratory complications. Findings included . A Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed Consent, dated 08/11/2020, documented Resident 45 declined the PCV13. No reason for the declination was given and no other information about the pneumococcal vaccine were found in the electronic health record. On 05/23/2024 at 12:17 PM, Staff J, Infection Preventionist and Licensed Practical Nurse, she said she could only find the 08/11/2020 consent form. Staff J said she believed the PCV13 should be reviewed quarterly at the care conference. Staff J said the care plan indicated Resident 45 wanted to get the PCV13 with her granddaughter. Staff J said she was not sure if this was followed up. At 3:40 PM, Staff C, Assistant Director of Nursing and Registered Nurse, said if the Pneumococcal vaccine was declined, we…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a facility investigation after a resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) and was later admitted with a diagnosis of narcotic overdose for 1 of 4 sampled residents (1) reviewed for facility investigations. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors, medication side effects, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/25/2024, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician order, dated 03/19/2024, documented, Morphine Sulfate ER [extended release] Oral Table Give 15 mg [milligrams] by mouth two times a day for pain. An alert note, dated 03/25/2024, documented, This LN [licensed nurse] went to check on pt [patient] . and patient alert and oriented x 1 only [alert to person, not place or time]. Patient had fall on 3/22 . [Resident] is only able to tell me I am [Resident 1]. R [Right] pupil…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-02-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were accurately posted and updated daily for 4 of 31 days (01/08/2026, 01/11/2026, 01/13/2026 & 01/15/2026) reviewed for nurse staff postings and failed to provide accurate identifiers on daily postings, to include the facility name, census and date. These failures placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census information.Findings included . Record Review of the nursing home daily staff postings showed they had not been updated for 4 shifts, dated 01/08/2026, 01/11/2026, 01/13/2026 & 01/15/2026 to accurately reflect the number of nurses and/or nursing assistants working per shift. Record review of the posting for 01/08/2026 showed 16 nursing assistants (CNAs) for the day shift (06:00 AM - 02:00 PM). The actual day shift schedule showed 13 CNAs worked. Record review of the posting for 01/11/2026 showed 15.5 CNAs for the day shift. The actual evening shift schedule showed 12.5 CNAs worked. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (Staff C) had the required qualifications/certification to perform their duties for 1 of 1 facility kitchens. The failure placed residents at risk of receiving a menu prepared by staff without the required competencies and skills to provide the necessary food and nutrition services. Findings included . On 04/15/2025 at 2:07 PM, a public complainant said the facility's dietary manager did not have a dietary management certification. On 04/17/2025 at 11:53 AM, Staff A said when Staff C was out of the facility, oversight of the kitchen was done by the Human Resources Director, who was also pursuing their Dietary Manager certification. Staff A said Staff C started her position as dietary manager on 02/10/2025. Staff A said Staff C was waiting about a month for a proctor for her final test to obtain her dietary manager certification. At 12:33 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse, said Staff C did not have a dietary manager certification. Staff B said Staff C was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-12-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/14/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2024
ATTRI, PRIYANKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2024
SCHNEIDER, BRENTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 18%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$443per resident / day
operating cost
$13,476per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$420per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505373. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next