Mountain View Post Acute
1050 E Mountain View, Ellensburg, WA 98926 · For profit - Corporation · 74 certified beds · (509) 925-4171 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $241,528 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 60.4% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.7% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.3% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.0% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.8% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.79 | 1.52 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 194 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.3%CMS range 41.6–54.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.8–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 3.0–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 66.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess/reassess and provide adequate supervision and safety monitoring for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. Resident 1, who had moderately impaired cognition and lacked safety awareness, experienced harm when they exited the facility unsupervised, was subsequently found by a bystander outside the facility, lying on the ground and sustained a head injury, left elbow fracture, and multiple bruises that required a hospital evaluation and intervention. Findings included .Review of a policy revised on March 2019 titled, Wandering and Elopement, showed the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the residents care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety.Review of Resident 1's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for neglect, when they failed to perform consistent skin assessments as ordered and failed to obtain and implement wound treatment orders when Resident 1 developed a new skin concern. Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed a necrotic (death of tissue) area to the right foot and fifth (little) toe which required hospitalization and surgical intervention of a partial amputation of the right foot (side of foot) including the little toe. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy dated 08/2024, titled, Abuse -screening, training, identification, investigation, reporting and protection, showed the definition for neglect is the failure to provide goods or services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015, showed neglect may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received physician ordered medication, had necessary laboratory values (labs) drawn as ordered, and received timely treatment for abnormal labs for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 5) reviewed for quality of care. This failed practice resulted in harm for Residents 1 and 2 when their treatment was delayed, conditions worsened, and required hospitalization. Residents 3 and 5 were at risk for their condition to worsen and experience inaccurate or a delay in treatment. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include removal of the left leg below the knee and kidney failure. The 04/19/2024 comprehensive assessment, showed the resident's cognition was intact and required one staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident 1's 04/12/2024 hospital notes, showed the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider (physician or nurse practitioner) following a resident's complaint of new onset chest pain for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 22) reviewed for change in condition. The failure to notify the provider in a timely manner resulted in harm to Resident 22 when they experienced distress, delay in treatment, and prolonged pain. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Managing Acute Condition Change (MACC), revised on 02/2018, showed the Resident Care Manager (RCM) or charge nurse would assess the resident experiencing an acute change. The facility would notify the physician and family/responsible party without delay when a change in condition had been identified. <Resident 22> Review of the electronic medical records showed Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) and a history of a heart attack. The 09/15/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services that addressed skin infections and accurate blood pressure treatments were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 44 and 13) reviewed for quality of care. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident 44 when they experienced unnecessary pain, emotional distress and a decline in their medical condition, and caused unmet care needs and placed Resident 13 at risk for negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 44> Review of the electronic medical records, showed Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the deep layer of skin) of the right lower leg, lymphedema (swelling caused by a blockage of the drainage of lymph fluid) of the right and left lower legs, heart disease, obesity, and depression. Resident 44's most recent comprehensive assessment, dated 10/31/2023, showed they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to ensure the safety of 1 of 2 residents (Resident 26) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in actual harm to the resident who experienced two falls within 10 hours, that resulted in a major injury; the first fall resulted in a head trauma with a laceration; the second fall resulted in a pelvic fracture. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Accident/Incident, revised 10/2022 showed a plan to prevent re-occurance is initiated at the time of the incident. <Resident 26> Review of the medical record showed Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), delirium (a serious change in mental ability that causes confused thinking and lack of awareness), kidney failure, and muscle weakness. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters (a hollow, partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag), was referred to a urologist for evaluation of the continued need for the urinary catheter. Resident 1 experienced harm when after nine months of use, they experienced a urethral (a tube that connects the urinary bladder to an opening for the removal of urine from the body) erosion (a place where surface tissue has been gradually destroyed) pressure injury (localized damage to the skin as well as underlying soft tissue sometimes related to medical devices). Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter, dated 02/2019, showed that: - residents who enter the facility without a catheter will not be catheterized unless medically necessary, - a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure inventions were implmented to safeguard, protect, and prevent the elopement (an instance where a resident leaves the facility without authorization and/or necessary supervision) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for serious injury and the potential for future elopements.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled Wandering and Elopements, revised in March 2019, showed residents who were identified as at risk for wandering or elopement would have strategies and interventions to maintain residents' safety on their care plan.Resident 1Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility, on 01/08/2026, with diagnoses of severe dementia (a loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities) with agitation (feeling of irritability or mental distress), anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and restlessness (the physical or mental inability to relax or sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for physical injury, psychosocial distress, and feeling unsafe in their home.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Abuse-Screening, Training, Identification, Investigation, Reporting, and Protection, revised in January 2025, defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury to another person and defined willful as a deliberate action.Resident 1Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis or impaired ability to move) of the right side and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [(COPD) a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe due to damaged, inflamed, and narrowed airways]. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 02/10/2026, showed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required the assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The failure to consistently monitor kitchen refrigerator temperatures for 2 of 2 kitchen refrigerators, and the failure to ensure undated/expired foods were discarded for 1 of 1 nutritional refrigerator (resident snack refrigerator), placed residents at risk for ingestion of contaminated food or beverages, cross contamination, and potential of food borne illness. Findings included . Review of the Washington State Retail Food Code dated January 18th, 2023, showed Food must be protected from contamination by preparing and storing food as follows: In a clean, dry location, where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination. Records must be monitored to verify that the critical limits required for food safety are being met. Normal refrigerator temperature requirements are 41 degrees Fahrenheit to 45 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the facility policy dated 08/01/2025, titled Resident Food from Outside Source showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement components of their infection prevention and control precautions regarding, A) the water management program (WMP) control measures (actions or steps taken), identified to reduce the potential growth/spread of Legionella (a bacteria that can cause a severe respiratory disease) in water, when not within acceptable ranges for 1 of 1 WMP reviewed for infection control and, B) respiratory devices were not cleaned/disinfected for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident 30), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Legionella WMP, reviewed November 2025, showed that proactive steps were established to provide an .infection-free environments for their residents, staff and visitors . The policy showed the facility would identify water system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their abuse/neglect policies and procedures to identify allegations of neglect filed as grievances for 10 of 44 grievances from 12/01/2025 to 02/23/2026) reviewed for neglect allegations. The facility did not provide a thorough investigation into the allegations of neglect to determine if further action to protect the residents was required. The lack of recognizing allegations of neglect and taking appropriate action placed residents at risk for a deterioration in their physical and or mental health. Findings included. Review of Nursing Home Guidelines Prevention and protection, Incident Identification, Investigation, and Reporting The Purple Book dated October 2015 (sixth edition), showed the definition of neglect as; an individual or entity with a duty of care fails to provide goods and services that maintain resident's physical and mental health. Record review of the facility grievances from 12/01/2025 to 02/23/2026 showed ten grievances that were not identified as allegations of neglect and not provided a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure investigations were completed and/or thorough for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 22, 4, and 52) reviewed abuse. The failure to initiate and complete thorough investigations placed residents at risk for unidentified accidents, abuse/neglect and serious injuries. Findings include . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), all incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. A thorough investigation was a systematic collection of a review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events to determine what occurred and make necessary changes to a resident's plan of care and services to prevent recurrence. The investigation should include the who, what, when, why and how, of the incident and establish a reasonable cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of competent nursing staff to provide care and services for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 5, 2, 3, and 35 ) as evidenced by failures related to Resident Rights, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Quality of Care, and Prevention or Decrease in Range of Motion. Additionally, reports in the facility grievance logbook showed allegations of neglect in care and staff interviews provided additional evidence of insufficient staff. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their needs met and potential/actual negative outcomes to their physical and mental health. Review of the 2025 Facility Assessment, updated 01/13/2026, showed on Section A. Function and Mobility for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) excluding bathing which required assistance was 87% of the facility residents. Additionally, ADLs excluding bathing for residents who required maximal assistance of two plus staff was 45.8% of facility residents. Residents that required mobility assistance with contractures (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable and sanitary environment was maintained for 8 of 12 resident rooms (Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 18, 21 and 25), 1 of 1 utility room (East hallway) and 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for environment. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential accidents and not feeling safe/secure with their environment. Findings included . Rooms room [ROOM NUMBER]: observation on 02/23/2026 at 11:15 AM, showed the bathroom door had an area measuring 2 1/2 feet (a unit of measure) by 10 inches (a unit of measure) where the paneling had been removed, exposing bare wood. room [ROOM NUMBER]: observation on 02/17/2026 at 10:27 AM, showed a five-foot scratch extending down the wall to the left of the entry. Multiple areas of paint were missing, and the drywall was exposed. room [ROOM NUMBER]: observation on 02/17/2026 at 10:27 AM, showed a six-foot area of the wall to the left of the entrance missing paint. A metal plate located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required assistance with incontinence received timely care to maintain their dignity for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for dignity. Resident 11 requested assistance with an incontinence episode however staff told them they would have to wait until other staff were available to help them. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, embarrassment, potential skin injuries and a deterioration in their quality of life. Findings included . Record review of a facility document given to residents on admission to the facility titled [NAME] Specific Residents Rights stated, the nursing home must protect the rights of the resident to have a dignified existence and promote and protect their rights. Resident 11Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included heart failure (the heart is unable to keep up with needs of the body),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required liability notices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 78) reviewed for liability notices. Failure of the facility to issue a Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage [NOMNC] or Advanced Beneficiary Notice [ABN] (required notifications informing Medicare beneficiaries that their covered services will be terminated and providing information on their appeal rights) before discharge from the facility placed Resident 78 at risk for not fully understanding their Medicare benefits and appeal rights. Findings included. Resident 78Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of a surgical repair to their left lower leg. Review of the 09/19/2025 discharge assessment showed Resident 78's cognition was intact. Review of Resident 78's Medicare documentation showed Resident 78 was not issued NOMNC or ABN notifications prior to their discharge from covered services on 09/29/2025. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were promptly followed up on by coming to a resolution of the grievance for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 5 and 4) reviewed for grievances. Additionally, the facility did not keep the residents updated on the progress of their grievances. This failure placed residents at risk for overall dissatisfaction with their lives and unresolved concerns. Findings included . Record review of a facility policy titled Grievances dated 08/2024 showed, each resident has the right to voice concerns/grievances. The facility will actively seek a resolution to concerns and keep residents updated on the progress. Resident 5 Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included heart failure (the heart can no longer keep up with the needs of the body), end stage renal disease with dialysis (the kidneys no longer work and require a machine to remove waste from the blood) and diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that change brain chemistry to alter a person's mood, thoughts, behavior, or perceptions) medications when they did not consistently attempt non-pharmacological (non-drug, strategies used first to manage mental health symptoms) interventions prior to medication use and failed to adhere to the 14-day limitation for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 35), reviewed for unnecessary medication. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for falls, medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needs. Findings included. Review of the policy titled, Psychotropic Medication, dated 08/01/2025, showed that non-pharmacological interventions would be attempted and documented prior to the use of any PRN psychotropic medication. Orders for such medications would expire in 14 days and would require an in-person assessment by a medical provider, along with supporting documentation, for the order to continue for an additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure residents dependent on staff received consistent showers, incontinent care, oral care, and nail care for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 2 and 3) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The failure to receive adequate showering and grooming care according to the residents' physician orders and care plan placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, impaired skin integrity, and a potential decline in health. Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised date March 2018, showed appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining and communication. Resident 2 Review of the resident's medical records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical well-being in accordance with professional standards of care by failing to ensure proper immobilization, and failing to consistently follow physician's orders to oversee the healing process for 1 of 3 resident (Resident 35) reviewed for falls with injury. This failure placed Resident 35 at risk for further injury, impaired healing, and a decline in range of motion (ROM). Findings included. Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a condition where the brain gradually loses the ability to control movement properly). The 01/03/2026 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 35's cognition was severely impaired and required the assistance of one-two staff members for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the comprehensive assessment showed Resident 35 had no impairment with their ROM to their upper extremity (hand).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for positioning. There were no assessments, specific interventions to mitigate the risk of contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff) or Restorative nursing for Range of Motion (ROM) services to prevent further decrease in range of motion and hand contracture. This failure placed the residents at risk for a decrease in mobility, development/worsening of contractures and inability to maintain their current level of functioning. Findings included. Resident 2 Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (severe or total loss of motor function on one side of the body) of the left side, dementia (loss of memory, thinking and the ability to perform daily activities), and need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored, labeled, and monitored in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to discard expired or improperly labeled medications on one of three medication carts (East medication cart) and failed to document twice-daily temperature monitoring for 1 of 1 medication refrigerator in medication storage room. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications and vaccines and negative health outcomes.Review of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention guidance titled, Vaccine Storage and Handling, dated 04/03/2024, showed to ensure safety of vaccines, the refrigerator must have a reliable temperature monitoring device with the recommended use of a recording device called a digital date logger (DDL-a device that records temperatures at least every 30 minutes). The guidance further showed when a DDL was not used, the facility should monitor and record the vaccine refrigerator temperature at a minimum of twice daily. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine and timely dental services were provided and failed to follow through on practitioner-ordered referrals for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 52, 53 and 41) reviewed for dental care. This failure placed the residents at risk for dental pain, nutritional compromise and unmet dental needs. Findings included. Resident 52 Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including heart failure and dementia (a decline in brain functions severe enough to interfere with daily life). The 12/21/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 52 cognition was moderately impaired and required the assistance of one staff member for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)s. During an interview on 02/17/2026 at 10:49 AM, Resident 52 stated they wanted to go to the dentist because they had one tooth in the back on the right side that was worn out. Resident 52 stated they had not seen a dentist since their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents/resident representatives (RR) were educated on the potential risk versus benefits when offering the pneumococcal and influenza immunization (specific vaccines that protects against pneumococcal bacteria and influenza viruses that can lead to lung, nose and throat infections) nor documentation that indicated vaccination were offered, accepted or refused for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 22 and 2) reviewed for immunizations with infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of exposure to contagious diseases without the knowledge of the risk/benefits in order to make an informed decision.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, dated 08/01/2024, showed the facility would provide residents with the opportunity to accept or refuse the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. The policy stated that a resident or RR would complete an immunization informed consent document, were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representative (RR) were offered/educated on the COVID-19 (an infectious disease causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) immunization (a specific vaccine for the COVID-19 virus) benefits/risks and potential side effects for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 22 and 2) reviewed for immunization status. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of making an uninformed decision and resident contracting the COVID-19 virus.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, COVID-19, dated 08/01/2024, showed that facility residents were offered the recommended COVID-19 immunization upon admission to the facility. The policy stated that an immunization informed consent would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to maintain Range of Motion (ROM) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 3, and 2) reviewed for Restorative Nursing programs. The lack of consistent processes in place for implementation of splints and providing ROM services placed residents at risk for not maintaining ROM in the affected areas of contractures (tightening of tendons and muscle), decreased function and pain.Findings included .Resident 1 Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including history of a stroke (blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted) with paralysis (loss or impairment of voluntary movement) on the left side and heart failure. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for dressing, grooming and mobility. During an observation on 09/29/2025 at 1:17 PM, Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure cleaning, disinfecting and/or storing of oxygen care equipment was maintained in a manner to prevent infectious diseases for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 4, 5 and 6 ) reviewed for cleanliness of oxygen concentrator (a device that pulls air out of the environment and concentrates into oxygen) filters and storage of oxygen tubing when not in use. This failure placed residents at risk for infectious disease transmission and illness in their respiratory system (lungs). Findings included .Resident 4Review of Resident 4's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (repeated episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep) and dementia (ongoing cognitive decline). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for grooming, dressing, transfers and mobility. Review of Resident 4's physicians order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of chemical restraints for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of experiencing unnecessary side effects such as sedation, decline in physical functioning, and placed residents at risk of experiencing an undignified life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use, revised February 2025, showed psychotropic medications were any medication that affected brain activity related to mental processes and behavior, and these medications were .never used to sedate or alter a resident's behavior for discipline or for the convenience of staff. Further review showed residents' medical record should show specific behaviors to monitor for, potential triggers for these behaviors, and non-pharmacological interventions to try for soothing before as needed psychotropic medication were administered. <Resident 5> Review of the medical record showed Resident 5 admitted to the facility, on 04/15/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the components for identification and reporting abuse/neglect from their abuse prohibition policy were implemented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice placed residents at an increased risk for unidentified abuse and neglect and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, Abuse-Screening, Training, Identification, Investigation, Reporting, and Protection, dated 08/01/2024, showed facility staff was expected to be able to identify abuse and neglect of residents and were mandated to report these incidents to the State Agency (SA). Further review of the facility policy showed the facility identified unauthorized chemical restraints as a form of abuse with the example .[(psychotropic) a substance that affects the mind or brain, causing changes in thinking, feeling, or perception] medication is administered in order to prevent a resident from displaying behaviors . or for staff convenience resulting in a changed behavior requiring a lesser…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse and/or neglect to the State Agency (SA) as required for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse/neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised September 2022, showed all reports of abuse and neglect .are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) . <Resident 5> Review of the medical record showed Resident 5 admitted to the facility, on 04/15/2025, with diagnoses of dementia (a disease that causes loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), diabetes (a disease that affects the body's ability to process sugar in the blood), sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep), and anxiety (a mood disorder causing the feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Review of the comprehensive assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration practices were maintained in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 5 receiving a chemical restraint and placed other residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings included . Review of Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice 10th edition, defined the following ethical areas: Informed consent was the patient's right to accept or decline treatment provided by the nurse, and in circumstances where the patient was incapable of fully understanding the treatment components, informed consent must be obtained trhough a responsible person such as a decision maker or guardian. Accountability required the professional nurse to be proactive and take all appropriate measures to ensure their professional practice was not lacking, remiss, or deficient in any area or way. Review of the facility policy, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure residents dependent on staff received consistent showers for 3 of 9 residents (Residents 1, 3, and 4) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care provided for dependent residents. The failure to receive adequate showering and grooming care according to the residents' care plan placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, impaired skin integrity, and embarrassment. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, weakness, altered mental status, and unsteadiness on their feet. Review of Resident 1's most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, and had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required substantial/maximal assistance with showering, upper/lower body dressing, and moderate assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed, free from odors and provided a dignified dining experience for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 13, 14, 25, 27, and 7) reviewed for dignity. These failures placed residents at risk for feelings of embarrassment, helplessness, and a diminished self-worth. Findings included . <Resident 13> Review of the medical record showed the resident was alert, oriented, and able to make their needs known. The10/18/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required assistance with transfers with a mechanical lift, turning in bed, nail care and bathing. Diagnoses included cancer of the prostate (gland at the base of the urethra (tube that urine exits the body), stroke with left sided paralysis, and urinary catheter use due to urinary retention. Resident 13 was incontinent of bowels. During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/06/2025 at 10:39 AM, Resident 13's fingernails were long and could be seen over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a prompt effort to resolve grievances (a concern that has happened or been done that you believed was unfair) was made regarding resident grievances discussed during Resident Council (RC, an independent group of nursing home residents who meet at a minimum of once a month to discuss concerns and suggestions and to plan activities that are important to them) meetings nor the residents right to file a grievance/grievance process for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 6, 12, 13, and 14) reviewed for grievances. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Grievance, dated 03/2019, showed the Activities Director (AD) should have completed a grievance if a concern was brought up during the RC meeting. The policy showed the Social Services Director (SSD) would then review/log the concerns and forward the concerns to the department heads who would complete them with appropriate actions and follow-up. Then, the grievance would be returned to the SSD who would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were completed or correct on/after residents admission to the facility and had the required level two referral sent if residents had a positive level one PASARR for 4 of 7 residents (Resident 9, 263, 56, 4) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the Department of Social and Health Services, Dear Nursing Home Administrator Letter, guidance titled, Clarification to the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 Screening Process, dated 07/06/2024, showed that nursing facilities will ensure residents with a positive level 1 PASARR screen have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (BCP) within 48 hours of admission that included resident specific initial goals and treatment plans, nor provide a summary of the required information from the BCP upon completion of the comprehensive care plan to the resident or the resident ' s representative for 5 of 10 newly admitted residents (Residents 49, 62, 60, 263, and 48) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the initial plan for delivery of care/services and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 49> Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including a stroke, anxiety, dementia (a progressive disease that destroys the memory and other important mental functions) and end of life care. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident preferred language was Spanish, cognition was severely impaired and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were consistently reviewed and revised to meet residents' current needs for 5 of 12 sample residents (25, 30, 13, 4, and 17) reviewed for care plans. Additionally, the facility failed to complete care conferences for 1 of 3 residents' (Resident 4) reviewed for resident/resident representative participation in care conferences. These failures to revise care plans and complete care conferences, define changes and allow resident participation in planning their care, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 25> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart failure and hypoxia (low level of oxygen in body tissue), on continuous oxygen and a Bipap machine (a device that helps you breathe by pushing pressurize air into your lungs) to be worn. Review of the 12/24/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician assistance for a resident with a mental health and substance use disorder (SUD, a medical condition that is defined by the inability to control the use of a particular substance or substances despite harmful consequences) history, provide ongoing assessment and monitoring of identified non-pressure skin conditions, and provide care for a peripheral IV line for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 263, 28, and 13) reviewed for quality of care.These failures placed residents at risk for delay of treatment, unmet care needs, and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 263> Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include a right foot ulcer, bi-polar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), SUD, and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). The 01/02/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 263's cognition was moderately impaired, had mild depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and services were provided to increase, maintain and/or prevent a decline in Range of Motion (ROM) mobility for of 4 of 6 residents (Residents 13, 14, 25 and 42) reviewed for limited ROM and restorative nursing services. The facility's failure to have a process in place that ensured timely processing of the program, assessment, and implementation of restorative nursing programs, placed residents at risk for not maintaining gains made while on skilled therapy, functional decline, increased dependence on staff for Activities of Daily Living. Findings included . Review of the July 2017 Restorative Nursing Services policy showed that restorative nursing may or may not accompany a formalized rehabilitative service (physical therapy, occupational, therapy or speech therapy) Restorative Assistance goals and objectives are to be individualized, resident centered and outlined in the resident's care plan. Restorative Assistance goal may include supporting and assisting residents in development and maintenance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of nursing staff to provide care and services for 12 of 13 residents (Residents 13, 14, 25, 27, 6, 22, 37, 28, 263, 30, and 42) as evidenced by failures related to Resident Rights, Grievances, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, daily actions like dressing, transferring/getting a resident up out of bed, changing briefs/toileting), Quality of Care, Resident Mobility, and Facility Assessment. Additionally, resident interviews and staff interviews provided evidence of insufficient staff. These failures place residents at risk for unmet care needs and the inability to attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included . Review of the facility's resident roster, dated 01/06/2025, showed a census of 62, of which more than half of the residents required transfer assistance via a mechanical lift or required assistance of one to two staff for ADL's.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure cleaning, disinfecting and/or storing of oxygen care equipment was maintained in a manner to prevent infectious diseases for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 36, and 35)reviewed for cleanliness of oxygen concentrator (a device that pulls air out of the environment and concentrates oxygen for use) filters and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for storage of oxygen tubing when not in use. These failures placed residents at risk for infectious disease transmission and illness in their respiratory system (lungs). Findings included . <Oxygen filters> <Resident 1> Review of the Resident 1's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, obstructive sleep apnea (repeated episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep) and dementia. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent for grooming, dressing, transfer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable and sanitary environment was maintained for 1) 2 of 3 halls (East and West) flooring, 2) East dining room, 3) [NAME] Hall shower room, 4) rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], 5) Laundry room, 6) East clean/dirty utility room, and 7) Conference/activities room. These failures placed the residents, at risk for potential accidents and the exposure to contaminants from unclean surfaces. Findings included . <East Hall Resident Room Floors> Observations on the east hall on 01/06/2025 at 11:00 AM, 01/07/2025 at 10:30 AM, 01/08/2025 at 11:15 AM, 01/09/2025 at 12:00PM, 01/10/2025 at 9:00 AM and 01/14/2025 at 9:00 AM, showed a housekeeper swept and mopped the east hallway to include resident rooms, utility rooms, linen room and east dining room. The dark substances and dirt embedded into the floors and entry ways was not cleanable. All resident rooms on the east hallway Rooms (1-12) had uncleanable dirt embedded black dirt substances at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor the need for a physical restraint (any physical, mechanical device or equipment that limits a resident ' s freedom of movement) when a seat belt was applied during the resident use of their electric wheelchair, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 17) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the resident at risk for a restriction of their free movement and/or activity and at an increased risk for injury when in their electric wheelchair. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Physical Restraints and Enablers/Devices, revised July 2023, showed that residents had the right to be free of physical restraints (any manual method or physical or mechanical device/equipment attached to the resident ' s body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one ' s body) .imposed for purposes of discipline or staff convenience, and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation of their abuse prohibition policy/procedures components of resident protection, identification, reporting and investigating for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 41, 28, 42, and 27) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at an increased risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, retaliation from the alleged perpetrator and the potential for continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, dated 08/08/2024, the Code of Federal Regulations 483.12 (b)(1), F607, the facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of residents property, and in order to .provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident residing in the facility . the facility must develop and implement components of screening, training, prevention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person that advocates for residents in nursing homes) for 1 of 2 residents (Residents 60) reviewed for transfer/discharge notice requirements. This failure placed the residents at risk for diminished protection from inappropriate transfers/discharges, a lack of access to an advocate that could inform them of their options/rights, and to ensure the resident advocacy agency was aware of the facility practices and activities related to a transfer or discharge. Findings included . <Resident 60> Review of the resident ' s medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart complications and Parkinson ' s (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves, causing shaking movements) and was transferred to the hospital on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) at the time of the resident ' s hospital transfer for 1 of 2 residents (Residents 60) reviewed for hospital transfers. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed and any monetary charges associated with the bed hold while in the hospital. Findings included . <Resident 60> Review of the resident ' s medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart complications and Parkinson ' s (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves, causing shaking movements) and was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The 10/09/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 60 had a moderately impaired cognition. Review of the medical record showed a 10/09/2024 progress note documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive resident centered care plans for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 21 and 56) reviewed for care plan development. This failed practice put residents at risk for unmet care and/or safety needs. Findings included . <Resident 21> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include a urinary tract infection and urine retention. The 11/22/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 21's cognition was severely impaired, they required the use of a retention catheter (R/C- a device used to drain urine from the bladder) and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. During an observation on 01/06/2025 at 10:16 AM, Resident 21 was sitting on the edge of their bed, the r/c tubing was hanging out of their right pant leg, with the end of the tubing touching the floor. Resident 21 had a white stretchy material wrapped around their ankle, the tubing, and the bag to secure them in place. Resident 21 had a r/c leg bag (a smaller…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure residents dependent on staff received consistent showers for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 37 and 22) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The failure to receive adequate showering and grooming care according to the residents' care plan placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, impaired skin integrity, and embarrassment. Findings included . <Resident 37> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted with diagnoses to include diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and asthma (a chronic respiratory condition which is caused by inflammation of the airway that causes narrowing of the airway). The 12/04/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 37's cognition was intact and required the assistance of one staff for showering/bathing. During an interview on 01/06/2025 at 3:45 PM, Resident 37 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who used chewing tobacco was assessed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 30) reviewed for smoking/chewing tobacco. This failure placed the resident at risk for interaction of medications with ingredients in chewing tobacco and/or with current health concerns. Findings included . <Resident 30> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] after surgery of an infection and partial amputation of the resident's foot. The 12/17/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident was alert and able to make their own decisions and required minimal assistance. Additionally, Resident 30 was on a psychoactive medication and an intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication. Resident 30's diagnosis includes nicotine dependence to chewing tobacco. During an observation and concurrent interview on 01/06/2025 at 11:20 AM, Resident 30 was chewing tobacco at their bedside in their room and stated he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident on continuous oxygen that required a Bipap device (an external device that helps you breathe by pushing pressurized air into your lungs and provides a fixed pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) was used for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure of staff to assess and document Resident 25's refusal to use their Bipap device placed Resident 25 at risk for ineffective assisted ventilation and unmet respiratory needs. Findings included . <Resident 25> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include hypoxia (low level of oxygen in body tissue), on continuous oxygen and a Bipap device to be worn at night. Review of the 12/24/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 25 was alert and oriented and had shortness of breath. During an interview on 01/08/2025 at 9:45 AM, Resident 25 stated they had not used their Bipap device for sleep for about two months now. The Bipap device was observed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement specific requirements for the timely administration of an immuno-suppressive medication Tacrolimus (used to prevent the body from rejecting a transplanted organ) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for high-risk medications. Additionally, the specific instructions for the medication were not included on the medication administration record (MAR) to ensure licensed nurses were aware of the importance with closely following the medication administration times to maintain steady levels of Tacrolimus in the blood. This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for low therapeutic blood levels of the immuno-suppressive medication and increased the risk for rejection of their transplant organ. Findings included . Record review of an undated patient pamphlet published by [NAME] Cancer Center titled Tacrolimus Reference Guide showed, Tacrolimus must be taken at the same time every day to keep steady levels of Tacrolimus in your blood. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 21 and 263) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to 1) consistently monitor individualized targeted behaviors, 2) attempt non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions prior to psychotropic medication administration, 3) assess for abnormal involuntary movements (AIMS, assess the presence and severity of abnormal movements of the face, limbs, and body in patients with tardive dyskinesia (abnormal and uncontrollable movements caused by antipsychotic [drugs that treat psychosis, a collection of symptoms that affect your ability to tell what's real and what isn't] medications) prior to starting a psychotropic medication and periodically thereafter. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy dated 2001,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide palatable, and warm meals at the proper temperature for 4 of 8 residents (4, 23, 41 and 48) reviewed for appetizing food and drink. This failure placed the residents at risk for less-than-adequate nutritional intake potentially leading to weight loss and dissatisfaction with their dining experience. Finding included . <Resident 4> Review of the resident's record showed they were admitted with diagnoses including diabetes (a disease that results in too much sugar in the blood) and malnutrition (when the body does not get enough nutrients). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 4 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating after meal set up. During an interview on 01/06/2025 at 1:48 PM, Resident 4 stated the food is terrible here. Further stating it was often served cold which was unappetizing to them and made it difficult to eat. During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/07/2025 at 8:52 AM showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to A) update the assessment when a substantial change occurred when the facility experienced a change in ownership, and B) update the assessment when substantial changes occurred for sufficient staffing when the facility lost their access to a nursing assistant training program that helped fill nursing assistant vacancies. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 09/2023, for (former facility name) showed what resources were necessary to provide person-centered care for residents during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The Facility assessment showed no change in ownership as of 08/01/2024. During an interview on 01/06/2025 at 8:50 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated they no longer had a nursing assistant program and that it had been suspended prior to Staff B becoming employed. During an interview on 01/09/2025 at 9:55 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the previous Administrator (from two weeks ago) was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the cognitive capacity to understand the nature and implication of entering into a binding arbitration agreement (an alternative means of settling disputes without a jury by trial) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 52 and 21) reviewed for arbitration. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of understanding of the legal contract they had signed and their right to make a choice for a jury trial in the event of a dispute with the facility. Findings included . <Resident 52> Review of the resident ' s medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including fracture of the right leg bone, stroke and dementia (a progressive disease that destroys the memory and other important mental functions). The 10/10/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident had a severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident 52 ' s arbitration agreement, dated 10/27/2024 showed the resident signed the legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were educated on the risks and benefits of the influenza vaccine, and consent or declination were obtained for the vaccine for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 14 and 27) reviewed for influenza immunization. This failure placed residents at risk of not being fully informed before making decisions regarding immunizations and receiving the vaccine. Findings included . <Resident 14> Review of the 11/22/2024 medical record showed the resident was alert, oriented and able to make their needs known. During an interview on 01/09/2025 at 1:00 PM, Resident14 stated they received a flu vaccine every year but had not been given the vaccine in 2024/2025 and would like to have the flu vaccine. Review of the 12/03/2024 informed consent for vaccine education, consent and/or declination showed Resident 14 declined the COVID-19 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete, thoroughly investigate, and provide prompt resolutions for grievances filed for 5 of 9 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) reviewed for grievances. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and the potential for unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy, titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing, showed the facility was to complete an investigation for any expressed concerns (verbally, in writing, or anonymously) within five working days of receipt, and the Grievance Office or Administrator would provide verbally (in writing upon request) the determined resolution to the resident and/or their representative. Review of the facility's documented grievances for August 2024, September 2024, and October 2024 showed 17 grievances were filed regarding 10 different residents. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility, on 11/14/2023, with diagnoses of heart disease, lower back inflammation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to maintain their Respiratory Protection Program (RPP) for N95 respirator masks (a respiratory protective device designed to filtrate airborne particles by achieving a very close facial fit) related to fit testing for 2 of 4 staff (Staff F and G) and appropriate wear for 3 of 6 staff (Staff E, H, and I) reviewed for infection control practices during a COVID-19 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing, that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak. This deficient practice placed residents and staff at continued risk of exposure and spread of COVID-19 during an active outbreak. Findings included . Review of guidance from the Washington State Department of Health website (with no date to reference), titled Respiratory Protection Program for Long-term Care Facilities, showed the N95 respirator protected the user when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff compliance with current infection control guidelines and standards of practice by 1) incorrectly donning/doffing (to put on/to take off) personal protective equipment (PPE) for 4 of 7 staff (Staff K, F, T, and U), 2) not adhering to fit testing (to ensure a proper fit) guidelines for N-95 respirator (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) for 5 of 5 staff (Staff G, I, M, N, and O), and 3) improper hand hygiene and glove changes for 4 of 7 staff (Staff K, F, T, and U) between dirty and clean tasks when providing care and services to residents on transmission based precautions ([TBP], safeguards to prevent spread of diseases) during a COVID- 19 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider of an elevated heart rate and a low blood pressure for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for change in condition This failure placed the resident at risk of inappropriate medication dosages, health complications, and timely care of services from the physician, resulting in a delay of treatment. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Managing Acute Condition Change, dated 07/11, showed: .Assess the resident experiencing an acute change including vital signs . Notify physician without delay . <Resident 4> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection of the lungs that may be caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), and hypertension (high blood pressure - when your blood is pumping with more force than normal through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident representative a summary of the baseline care plan for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 33, 38, 149, and 43) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure placed the residents at risk for an unsafe environment, a delay in care and services, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan - [NAME] (an information system that is used for a quick reference for nurses)/Baseline Care Plan, revised February 2019, showed the [NAME] would be completed, printed, and reviewed with the resident and/or their representative. The resident would be asked to sign a copy of the [NAME], indicating they received the information, and that signed copy would be scanned into the electronic medical record. If the resident was unable to sign, a progress note would be entered into the resident's medical record to reflect that the [NAME] was reviewed with the resident and/or their representative.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive assessments and care plans prepared by the required members of the interdisciplinary team (a group of healthcare providers from different fields who work together for the best outcome for residents) for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 43, 44, 27, and 153) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, last revised February 2023 §483.21 (b) (ii) The interdisciplinary team (IDT) must, at a minimum, consist of the resident's attending physician, a registered nurse and nurse aide with responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition services staff, and to the extent possible, the resident and resident representative. <Resident 43> Review of the electronic medical record showed Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a left knee replacement and high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Five medication errors were identified for 3 of 9 residents (Residents 40, 19, and 249) observed during 31 medication administration opportunities, that resulted in an error rate of 16.13%. Errors in medication administration had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible and possible adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, General Guidelines, dated 01/2023, showed staff that are allowed to administer medications, administer medications in accordance with manufacturers' instructions. Review of the Instructions for use (IFU) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) revised 07/2023, stated to prime the insulin pen with a new needle prior to each injection administration. Priming was meant to remove air from the needle and the cartridge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection control interventions, intended to mitigate the risk for transmission of infectious diseases, were consistently implemented in the areas of: A) Transmission based precautions (TBP- standard precautions [minimum infection prevention practices that apply to all patient care] along with additional precautions for residents that may be infected with certain infectious diseases) for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 151, and 38) reviewed for TBP; B) Personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 38) reviewed for PPE in TBP rooms; C) Medication administration for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 38, 40, 42, and 32) reviewed for infection control practices during medication administration. These failures placed the residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included . Review of the Washington State Hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for grievances. The failure to promptly attempt to resolve grievances disallowed the resident their right to a timely grievance resolution and placed the resident at risk for dignity and financial concerns. Findings included . Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and a right knee fracture. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff member for activities of daily living. During an interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:04 AM, Resident 6 stated their hearing aid charger was lost in February 2023 and was not replaced by the facility. During an interview on 12/14/2023 at 1:11 PM, Staff P, Social Service Director (SSD) stated they were not sure what happened to Resident 6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an incident involving an unwitnessed event with substantial (of considerable importance) injury was reported to the State Agency (SA) as required for 1 of 2 resident (Resident 26) reviewed for falls with injury. The failure to report an unwitnessed fall that resulted in a substantial bodily injury, placed the resident at risk for further injury, harm and potential neglect. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, sixth edition, dated October 2015, showed substantial and substantial reasonably (good judgement) related incidents, were to be reported to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) within 24 hours of the incident. <Resident 26> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 27 and 19) reviewed for residents' dependent on staff for personal grooming and hygiene. The failure to provide the necessary care and services to dependent residents placed them at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 27> Review of the electronic medical records showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a recent urinary tract infection, Parkinson's disease (a condition that affects the brain and causes problems with movement, balance, and coordination), and onychomycosis (a nail fungus causing distorted, thickened, brittle, crumbling, yellowish color to the toenails and fingernails). The resident's most recent comprehensive assessment, dated 09/22/2023, showed they required extensive to total assistance of one to two caregivers for bathing, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 20), reviewed for vision. Failure to ensure residents received vision care and assistive devices placed the residents at risk for worsening vision. <Resident 20> Review of Resident 20's electronic medical record (EMR), showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, presbyopia (loss of the eye to focus on objects closely), diplopia (a condition of the eye that caused double vision), and cataracts (cloudy patches that covers the eye causes blurred vision). The 10/19/2023 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 20 required partial or substantial assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs) and an intact cognition. During an observation and interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:31 AM, Resident 20 stated they should be wearing glasses because they have cataracts.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of three medication carts (South and East Hall medication carts), reviewed for medication storage, were secured. This failure placed residents at risk for access to potentially harmful medications and negative health outcomes Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, Storage of Medication, dated 01/2023, showed medications were to be stored properly and accessible only to licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel, or staff members who were lawfully authorized to administer medications. Medication storage should remain locked when not in use or attended by staff with authorized access. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, General Guidelines, dated 01/2023, showed the medication cart was to be closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse and no medications were to be kept on top of the medication cart. During an observation on 12/15/2023 at 8:57 AM, showed Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN), obtained medications for Resident 38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of an injury for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for a change in condition. This failure placed the resident at risk for a delay in medical treatment and of not having a resident representative involved in health care decision making. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Skin at Risk/Skin Breakdown, dated 09/2020, showed that newly identified skin impairment (abrasion, excoriation, pressure sore, rash, or skin tear), the licensed nurse will notify the physician and notify the resident representative. <Resident 1> Review of Resident 1's medical record showed they were admitted from another long term care nursing facility on 03/09/2022. Review of the 03/15/2022 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 09/15/2023 at 6:33 AM, showed Resident 1 was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (an infection of any part of the urinary system) and sepsis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was being posted in a place readily accessible to residents/visitors and included the required information on 3 of 7 days (01/08/2025, 01/09/2025, and 01/13/2025) of the recertification survey. This failure placed residents, family members and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of current staffing levels and resident census information. Findings included . Observations on 01/08/2025 at 10:47 AM no daily staffing roster noted anywhere in the front of the nursing home or by the nursing desk area, on 01/09/2025 at 10:02 AM, no daily staffing roster posted where the surveyor could find it, in the front where visitors could visualize it, or at the nursing desk area, and on 01/13/2025 at 9:06 AM, no daily nurse staffing posting that included the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked per shift for Registered Nursed, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Nursing Assistants who would have been responsible for the resident's care. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$241,528 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-11-03
- $47,918 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
- $37,557 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
- $114,865 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
- $30,830 — penalty dated 2023-09-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 08/01/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| CASTANEDA, MARCUS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| FLEMMING, STANLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| SCHNEIDER, BRENT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/24/2025 |
| ELLENSBURG 1050 REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $987K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505263. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.