Cedar River Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 403 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 212 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.74 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.53 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.34 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-08-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff performed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR- an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air when the resident's heart stops and they stop breathing) to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for unexpected death in the facility. The failure to ensure staff followed the facility's policy for CPR including staffs ability to accurately assess signs of irreversible death, immediately verify the Physician's Order (PO) for CPR status, immediately access the resident's POLST form (Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment - a document the resident completes to declare their wishes for CPR or No CPR), initiate CPR, communicate effectively to the 911 operator, communicate effectively to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel, provide accurate residents records to EMS personnel placed 39 additional residents (Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect and provide a dignified existence that promoted quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for resident rights. The failure to have a process for staff to provide a comfortable environment for residents after the death of a roommate, placed residents at risk of feeling scared, unsafe, distressed, and have a diminished quality of life. Resident 2 was harmed, using the reasonable person concept, when their roommate (Resident 1) died and they were left in the same room with the deceased resident from 10:00 PM on [DATE] until 5:30 PM on [DATE], 19.5 hours. Resident 2 was placed in a situation to cause harm to their mental well-being, safety, and dignity when they were not separated from their dead roommate's body. Findings included . The [DATE] admission nursing assessment and [DATE] admission progress note showed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], was cognitively intact, had some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed, failed to ensure medications were available from the pharmacy and failed to notify the provider of not giving medications as ordered for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) whose medication regimens were reviewed. The failure to ensure orders were followed and medications were made available, placed residents for unnecessary pain, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>Review of the facility's 01/2025 Medication Ordering and Receiving from the Pharmacy policy showed timely delivery of new orders is required so that medication administration is not delayed.According to the 06/25/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 1 had medically complex diagnoses including orthopedic conditions, pain in right hip, and anxiety. The MDS showed Resident 1 needed after care for orthopedic surgery, pain management and surgical wound care. In an interview and observation on 06/25/2026 at 2:15 PM, Resident 1 stated they just…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-20 · tag F0825 — pattern
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as determined by the physician's order and the residents' plan of care for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for Occupational Therapy (OT) services. This failure placed residents at risk of not attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included . <Facility Assessment>Review of the updated February 2026 Facility Assessment showed the facility would conduct, document, and review their facility-wide assessment to consider their resident population and the resources needed to care for these residents. The assessment showed OT services were provided seven days per week, and the hours provided per day varied depending on the facility census. The assessment showed the facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for their resident population during day-to-day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that included the required participants. This failure put residents at risk for unmet care needs due to ongoing non-compliance with federal regulations and detracted from the interdisciplinary effectiveness of the team. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a December 2024 facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement [QAPI] Committee policy, the committee would meet monthly and listed the staff to serve on the committee which included the: Administrator; Director of Nursing Services; Medical Director, and infection control representative. Review of the 07/11/2024 QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheet showed the Medical Director did not attend. Review of the 08/29/2024 QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheet showed the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and Infection Preventionist did not attend. Review of the 09/26/2024 QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheet showed the Medical Director and Infection Preventionist did not attend. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' medical information was maintained in a manner to ensure privacy and confidentiality when staff failed to properly secure medical records for 3 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 59, 7, & 50) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality and 7 supplemental residents (Residents 30, 66, 264, 9, 38, 56, & 55). The failure to ensure residents' medical appointment and weight information were stored in a secure manner placed residents at risk for a loss of privacy and a diminished quality of life. <Findings> <Facility Policy> Record review of the facility's December 2016 Resident Rights policy showed facility staff were prohibited from disclosing Protected Health Information (PHI - any information that could be used to identify someone and their health care status). The policy directed staff to make reasonable efforts to protect residents' PHI. <Resident 30> Observations on 04/14/2025 at 10:59 AM and 04/14/2025 at 1:10 PM showed a folder placed upright on the counter at the 3rd floor nurses station. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity for 1 of 16 sample residents reviewed (Resident 214). This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished sense self-worth and overall well-being. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised February 2021 Dignity Policy each resident would be cared for in a manner that promoted or enhanced their sense of well-being. The policy showed when staff helped with care, residents should be supported and provided with a dignified dining experience. <Resident 214> According to the 04/10/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 214 needed substantial/maximal assistance with eating due to fractures to right and left shoulders. In an interview and observation on 04/15/2025 at 8:20 AM, Resident 214 stated they had to be fed because they could not move their arms due to their shoulder fractures. Staff G (Certified Nursing Assistant) assisted Resident 214 with four large bites of oatmeal and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 3 (Residents 63, 23, & 29) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative, in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decisions about transfers/discharges. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a system by which the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO, an advocacy group for individuals residing in nursing homes) received required resident discharge/transfer information for 3 (Residents 63, 23, & 29) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to ensure the required notification was completed, denied the LTCO the opportunity to educate residents and advocate for them regarding the discharge process. Findings included .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a mental health screening required prior to admission to a nursing home) assessments were completed as required for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 45 & 50) reviewed for PASRR screening. The failure to ensure PASRR screenings were complete and accurate left residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the undated facility PASRR policy, the facility would screen for mental disorders prior to admission by completing a Level I PASRR form. The policy showed the facility would ensure the Level I PASRR was complete and accurate prior to admission. Individuals who had or were suspected to have a mental disorder would not be admitted to the facility unless: a Level II invalidation was completed by the state-designated authority, a Level Il evaluation was completed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to ensure comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) were developed to address all identified resident care needs for 4 (Residents 58, 214, 14, & 45) of 16 residents whose CPs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and frustration. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's December 2016 Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, facility staff would develop and implement a comprehensive CP in conjunction with the resident and/or their representative. The policy showed CPs should include measurable goals and describe the care and services the resident should be provided. <Resident 58> According to the 03/27/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 58 medical conditions including spinal cord dysfunction, spinal stenosis (a narrowing of spinal cord space that compressed nerves of spine) and muscle weakness. The MDS showed Resident 58 had frequent pain. Review of history and physical admission paperwork dated December 2024 showed Resident 58…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for 1 of 5 (Resident 45) residents whose medication regimens were reviewed. The failure to ensure orders were followed placed residents for unneeded treatment, and other negative health outcomes Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's July 2016 Administration Orders policy showed facility staff should administer medications in accordance with the physician's orders. Review of the facility's undated Weight Assessment and Intervention policy showed facility staff should monitor residents for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. <Resident 45> According to the 04/08/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 45 had medically complex diagnoses including heart disease and heart failure. The MDS showed Resident 45 had high blood pressure. Record review showed Resident 45's physician's orders included the following: - a 04/03/2025 order to weigh Resident 45 daily and notify the physician for a weight gain of more than two Pounds (lbs)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs - daily hygiene and other self-care tasks) for 2 (Residents 13 & 7) of 6 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide ADL assistance residents were assessed to require placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished feelings of self-worth, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's revised March 2018 Activities of Daily Living, Supporting policy, showed residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal hygiene, and oral hygiene. <Resident 13> Review of the 03/07/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 13 needed moderate assistance with showering/bathing and had a compression fracture in their spine. Review of 03/01/2025 ADL/Mobility Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 13's bathing/showering was to be done per the shower schedule. Review of second floor shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$74,815 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $74,815 — penalty dated 2024-08-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA