No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sullivan Park Care Center

14820 East Fourth, Spokane, WA 99216 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (509) 922-1644 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (509) 922-1644 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$126,188 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (93) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $126,188 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-09)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
14402 E Sprague Ave, 0 · (509) 922-2625 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
15510 E Sprague Ave · (509) 891-0735 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.3 mi
14020 E Sprague Ave · (509) 921-9859 · Call to confirm hours
Park
14015 E 17th Ave · (509) 928-7627 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.3%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%2.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.7%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.5%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.3%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.2%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.5%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.4%13.4%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 308 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.4%CMS range 41.4–52.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 9.5–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.2–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
52.3%
Total nursing turnover
52.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 122.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

32
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-06)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

93 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 81 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-09-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary pain management for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3 and 4), reviewed for pain. Resident 3 and 4 each experienced harm when the facility did not ensure they had the ordered pain medication, or another effective alternative, to treat the residents timely, which resulted in each resident requiring to transfer to the hospital to relieve their pain. This failure placed residents at risk of uncontrolled pain and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Medication Orders, dated January 2023, showed a prescription required multiple components including a manual signature from the medical provider to be valid. <Resident 3> Review of the hospital discharge notes dated 07/26/2024 showed Resident 3 had pain to their right wrist, right groin, and right shoulder after a fall which resulted in fractures to the pelvis, rib and wrist. The resident was to discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the identified transfer assistance required to prevent injury for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents and supervision. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident 1, who sustained a fracture and pain during a transfer without utilization of a two-person assist and appropriate equipment, as required. Findings included . Review of the 01/02/2024 annual assessment showed Resident 1 was dependent on staff for transfers, had impaired mobility to one upper and one lower extremity, and had no falls since the previous assessment. Per the mobility care plan initiated 01/08/2021, Resident 1 was to use a sit-to-stand lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer residents who could bear some weight) for transfers. The care plan included the instruction: this needs to be done with two people. Additionally, the care plan stated if the resident was drowsy, having increased weakness, or decreased ability to bear weight, staff were to use the Hoyer lift (full body mechanical lift used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication management. The failure to ensure medications were acquired and administered as ordered placed residents at risk for adverse events related to missed medications. This constituted a Past Non-Compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the situation occurred; however, there was sufficient evidence that the facility corrected the non-compliance after it was identified). The facility educated staff, updated training methods, and monitored for additional missed medications, by 02/02/2026. The facility was notified of the past non-compliance on 06/18/2026.Findings included .Review of Resident 1's Skilled Nursing Facility Transfer Orders, dated 01/30/2026, showed the resident had diagnoses of diabetes (chronic condition that affects how the body uses blood sugar) and hypothyroidism (condition in which the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone). Medication orders included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate consents were obtained prior to the administration of psychoactive (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior and are typically used to treat mental health conditions) medications for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 91, 102 and 411) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure precluded the residents or their representatives to participate in decisions regarding their care and treatment. Findings included . <Resident 411> A 10/2022 facility policy titled Psychoactive Medications showed, the staff obtained informed consent from the resident or their representative prior to the administration of any psychoactive medication. Informed consent included a review of the risks and benefits of the psychoactive medication. Review of a 02/21/2025 Social History Assessment showed Resident 411 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the staff assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse prevention policy including identification of potential allegations, timely reporting allegations to the State Survey Agency as required, thoroughly investigating allegations, and monitoring residents for potential psychosocial harm after allegations were made for 6 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 42, 62, 63, 35, 311, and 20), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of potential abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation or their property and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised April 2021, documented the facility would develop and implement policies to prevent and identify abuse or mistreatment of residents; neglect of residents; and/or theft, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property. Staff would be provided orientation and training on abuse prevention, incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 6, 23, 411, 416, 417, and 62) reviewed for trauma informed care, received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The failure of the facility to adequately screen, assess, identify potential triggers (a psychological stimulus that prompts recall of a previous traumatic event), and develop and implement a Trauma Informed Care Plan to help limit the residents' exposure to potential trauma triggers, placed the residents at risk for re-traumatization and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the [DATE] facility policy titled, Trauma-Informed Care showed, the facility screened residents for indications of trauma for newly admitted residents and as part of the comprehensive care plan process, and developed appropriate interventions based upon the screening responses and resident observations. The facility interviewed the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility had enough staff to provide care according to facility acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and/or care plans for 5 of 10 sampled resident's, (Resident 63, 62, 91, 89, and 42), reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed all residents at risk for potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment reviewed January 2025, documented the facility's average daily census was 120. The facility admitted more acutely ill residents with multiple co-morbidities and provided care for an increased number of residents with drug abuse, cognitive impairment, behaviors and used a wander guard system (system consisting of a bracelet that would alarm when an exit door was approached) on the south side of the building (400, 500, and 600 halls) with secured doors leading onto the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual staff performance reviews yearly as required and provide education based on the outcome of these reviews for 4 of 6 sampled staff (Staff I, BB, N, and UU), reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or underqualified care staff, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Staff N> Review of Staff N's, Nursing Assistant (NA), personnel file showed they were originally hired on 09/06/2016. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. <Staff UU> Review of Staff UU's, NA, personnel file showed they were originally hired on 02/21/2018. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. <Staff I> Review of Staff I's, NA, personnel file showed they were originally hired on 01/14/2022. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. <Staff BB> Review of Staff BB's, NA, personnel file showed they were originally hired on 03/14/2022. No documentation of a performance evaluation was found. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable food for 5 of 14 sampled residents (Residents 35, 46, 211, 20, and 17) reviewed for food. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased nutritional intake, potential weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . In a Resident Council (group of facility residents that regularly met to discuss care at the facility) Meeting on 02/26/2025 at 10:37 AM, the Council stated the food was only good maybe two days a week. The Council explained the vegetables were overcooked, the menu lacked variety, and the weekend food was the worst. <Resident 35> The 02/26/2025 comprehensive assessment documented Resident 35 had diagnoses which included diabetes and depression. Resident 35 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding their care. In an observation and interview on 02/24/2025 at 3:16 PM, Resident 35 was lying in bed and watching television. Resident 35 stated the quality and taste of the food had diminished over the past year. Resident 35 explained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, discard and distribute food, monitored temperatures of foods being served, ensure accuracy of preparation of thickened liquids, and maintain a cleaning schedule in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchens, reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for food borne illness and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022 revised 01/18/2023, showed that food must be labeled with the date the food was prepared, the package opened, and the date the food must be discarded as directed by the food manufacturer's use-by-date. During a kitchen observation and interview on 02/24/2025 at 09:02 AM, the reach-in refrigerator contained an unlabeled tossed salad covered with plastic wrap. Staff Z, Dietary Manager, acknowledged the salad should have been labeled with a date and quickly disposed of it. Staff Z stated that it was important for food to be discarded at the appropriate time to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during wound care to include removal of gloves and performing hand hygiene (HH) when indicated for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 101 and 105), reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, staff did not implement or follow Enhanced Barrier and Contact Precautions when indicated. Additionally, staff failed to notify the Infection Preventionist (IP) of a potential gastrointestinal (GI) outbreak in 1 of 4 units in the facility. These failures placed the residents at risk for the spread of infections, illnesses and unintended health consequences. Findings included . The Centers for disease Control (CDC) 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings updated September 2004 retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/isolation-precautions/index.html documented Standard Precautions were recommended the use of gloves,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was evaluated to self-administer their medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 20), observed during medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk for missed medication doses or unintended health consequences. According to a 01/10/2025 comprehensive assessment, Resident 20 had diagnoses that included diabetes, heart failure and aphasia (a partial or total loss of the ability to articulate or comprehend language). Per the assessment, they could usually understand and made their needs known. Their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive test) score was 00 (out of a maximum of 15), and all responses were either: no answer, missed, incorrect or could not recall. A review of Resident 20's care plan, initiated on 01/06/2022 and revised on 01/13/2025, showed a focus that the resident had episodes of refusing cares, and the goal was the resident would accept cares and have fewer episodes of refusals. An Interdisciplinary Team Conference Note, dated 01/10/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 81 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to make reasonable efforts to accommodate a resident's visual impairment needs for 1 of 4 sampled resident (Resident 46), reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk of eye strain, potentially avoidable accidents, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 02/17/2025 quarterly assessment, Resident 46 had diagnoses including cataracts (the natural clear eye lens becomes cloudy making it difficult to see). The assessment further showed Resident 46 had impaired vision and had no corrective lenses. Resident 46 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of the 10/19/2021 vision care plan showed Resident 46's vision was within normal limits with use of their glasses and instructed staff to arrange eye appointments as needed, monitor for signs and/or symptoms of eye problems and to ensure Resident 46's glasses were clean, in good repair, and easily available for use. Review of a 01/22/2025 vison exam progress notes showed Resident 46 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure advanced directive documents were completed accurately and the correct information was entered into the medical record for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 102, 91 and 63), reviewed for advanced directives. Specifically, Resident 102 had conflicting information regarding what interventions staff were to take during a code situation (an emergency where one would die if cardio-pulmonary rescusitation, CPR, was not started) and Resident 91 had severe cognitive impairement and signed their own advanced directive documents. These failures created potential for confusion during medical emergencies and for resident decision makers to be uninformed of a resident's care. Findings included Review of the facility policy titled, Advanced Directives reviewed [DATE], defined advanced directives as written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney (POA) for healthcare, recognized under law, related to the provision of healthcare when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, safe and homelike environment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 20), reviewed for environment. Specifically, Resident 20's walls in their room were in disrepair and chemicals were not properly secured in a storage room. These failures placed all residents at risk for potentially avoidable injuries and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an observation and interview on 02/24/2025 at 10:31 AM, Resident 20 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room. Resident 20's room had multiple patches of drywall on the wall next to their bed and the wall at the foot of their bed. The wall to the right as you entered the room had black scrapes and gauges out of the wall. The wall to the left as you entered the room had a hole near the floor. The bathroom was painted a tan color, a paper towel dispenser in the room had been raised and the area was blue from the previous paint job. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently supervise and/or monitor cognitively impaired residents' behaviors to prevent verbal and/or physical resident-to-resident altercations to the extent possible for 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 89 and 63), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of potential abuse, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised April 2021, documented the facility would develop and implement policies to prevent and identify abuse or mistreatment of residents; neglect of residents; and/or theft, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property. Staff would be provided orientation and training on abuse prevention, incident identification and reporting. The policy further showed all potential allegations of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify what information was conveyed to the hospital at the time of transfer for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 110 and 104), reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed residents at risk for a disruptive, ineffective transition from the facility to the hospital setting and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Notice of Transfer or Discharge dated April 2020, showed when a resident transferred to the hospital, staff documented the transfer in the medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving hospital. The policy showed the minimum information communicated to the hospital included the contact information of the provider responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information, including contact information, Advanced Directive information, special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, Comprehensive Care Plan goals, a copy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a required Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 evaluation (a person-centered evaluation that is completed for anyone identified as having or suspected of having a serious mental illness, intellectual disability, developmental disability, or related condition) prior to admission for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 6 and 102), reviewed for PASRR. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident 52's PASRR Level 2 recommendations were implemented. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet mental health care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled PASRR Process dated March 2019, showed that if a Level 2 PASRR was indicated the facility Social Worker would ensure the resident was evaluated within a timely period. <Resident 6> Review of a 02/17/2025 assessment showed Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions and assessed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level I (PASRR, determines if an individual had or was suspected of having a serious mental illness [SMI], intellectual or developmental disability or related condition) were accurately completed for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 6, 411, and 63 ) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, PASRR Process dated March 2019, showed the facility ensured that upon a resident's admission to the facility, a PASRR Level I was included in the admission paperwork. If there was no PASRR Level I, the Medical Records Director or designee contacted the hospital to obtain it. Review of the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services Level I PASRR form showed the facility was responsible for ensuring the form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that documented resident specific goals and treatment plans for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 6 and 411), reviewed for new admissions. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, possible medical complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 6> Review of an admission assessment showed Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record showed the resident was treated with medications for heart failure, high blood pressure, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). Additionally, the resident was diagnosed as legally blind. Review of the resident's baseline care plan showed no goals or interventions to address the provider orders for the management of the cardiovascular diagnoses or the vision impairment. <Resident 411> Review of the medical record showed Resident 411 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop the care plans and implement interventions for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 78, 62, and 41), reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the residents at risk for inadequate care, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set, an assessment]/Care Plan Review dated June 2017 showed, the facility reviewed a resident's care plan, no less frequently than quarterly to ensure the care plan reflected the resident's current needs. <Resident 78> Review of a 12/16/2024 admission assessment showed Resident 78 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions. The assessment further showed Resident 78 had difficulty hearing and used a hearing aid or other hearing appliance. During an observation on 02/24/2025 at 9:50 AM, Resident 78 was in bed with a hearing aid (HA) to the right ear. An observation on 02/25/2025 at 10:19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plans in response to changing goals, needs of the residents or in response to current interventions for 2 of 33 sampled residents (Residents 44 and 35) reviewed. Specifically, Resident 44 fell and broke their hip, and had continued falls and the care plan was not updated. Additionally, Resident 35 was newly diagnosed with Addison's disease (when the adrenal glands are damaged and do not produce enough hormones to regulate blood pressure, water and salt balance, and respond to stress), and disease related interventions were not added to the residents care plan. These failures put the residents at risk for unmet care needs and unintended health consequences. Findings included . <Resident 44> A review of the 12/18/2024 significant change assessment documented Resident 44 had diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbances and right femur (upper thigh bone) fracture. Resident 44 was severely cognitively impaired, behaviors had worsened since their last assessment, and they had fallen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring assistance with their activities of daily living (ADLs), were provided timely assistance according to their needs and preference for 2 of XXX sampled residents (Residents 52 and 41) reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, Resident 52 was not provided showers per their preference and Resident 41 was not shaved when indicated. This failure put residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 52> The 12/26/2024 admission assessment documented Resident 52 had diagnoses that included empyema (pockets of infection that build up in the space between the lung and the chest wall) and fractured ribs. The resident was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance of 1 to 2 staff for showering. The 12/28/24 care plan revised on 01/30/2025 documented Resident 52 was at risk for skin breakdown related to incontinence. Staff were instructed to keep the skin clean and dry, and minimize exposure to moisture from incontinence, wounds, and perspiration. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement the bowel management protocol when indicated for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 18 and 71), reviewed for constipation. In addition, the facility failed to identify changes in a resident's skin condition timely for 1 of 2 sampled residents, (Resident 15), reviewed for skin conditions. These failures placed residents at risk for complications, worsening conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Bowel Protocol, revised Febuary 2019, documented nursing staff was to review a resident's bowel monitor every shift. The policy instructed nursing staff to implement the bowel program if a resident did not have a bowel movement (BM) for three days. The policy documented nursing staff was to administer Milk of Magnesia (MOM) on day three and a laxative suppository was to be administered the next shift if there were no results from MOM. If the resident exceeded four days without a BM, the Licensed Nurse performed an abdominal assessment and notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who admitted without pressure injuries did not develop pressure injuries and residents with pressure injuries did not worsen. Specifically, the facility failed to communicate interventions to the staff including settings of specialty mattresses, the correct use of positioning devices, and to address the identification of refusals of care for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 101, 1, and 105), reviewed for pressure injury. These failures placed residents at risk for pressure injury development, wound infections and/or complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Skin at Risk/Skin Breakdown revised September 2020, showed residents who entered the facility without pressure injuries would not develop pressure injuries unless the clinical condition demonstrated it was unavoidable and a resident with pressure injuries would receive the necessary treatment and services to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure smoking materials were secured as care planned for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 18), reviewed for smoking. In Addition, the facility failed to assessed and monitored for the safe use of an electrical heating appliance for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 78), reviewed for accident hazards. These failures placed residents at risk for potentially avoidable accident and placed the facility at risk of fire. Findings included . <Electrical Appliances> Review of a 12/16/2024 admission assessment showed Resident 78 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions. The assessment further showed Resident 78's cognition as intact and had both vision and hearing impairment. Resident 78 required assistance from the staff to complete Activities of Daily Living. An observation on 02/25/2025 at 10:19 AM showed Resident 78 in bed, head slightly up, and a heating pad to their right side. When asked about its use, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, also known as a central line, a catheter placed in a large vein in the arm that extended to a large vein in the heart, used if long term antibiotic therapy was required or if antiobiotics were damaging to smaller veins) was maintained according to standards for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 52) reviewed. This failure placed the resident at risk for complications related to their PICC including blood stream infections, blood clots, or inflammation of the vein. Findings included . The 2011 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, updated October 2017, retrieved at https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/intravascular-catheter-related-infection/index.html documented the following recommendations: replace transparent dressings used on central venous catheters at least every 7 days or if it becomes loosened, damp, or visibly soiled, and promptly remove any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen delivery equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 35, 74) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications and infection. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Respiratory Treatment, dated 06/22/2022, documented the external filter of an oxygen concentrator provided no protection to the resident from respiratory illness, per manufacturers. The filter kept debris from the concentrator compressor only and provided no respiratory protection to the resident. Oxygen cannulas/mask and tubing were to be changed as needed if soiled or damaged and the concentrator filters were to be cleaned weekly. <Resident 74> Per the 12/18/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 74 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe), respiratory failure and needed oxygen due to those conditions. Review of the physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to evaluate staff competencies in skills and techniques to ensure staff provided necessary care and respond to each resident's individualized needs for 10 of 12 sampled staff (Staff I, S, N, BB, HH, JJ, LL, RR, SS, and UU), reviewed for nursing services. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or underqualified care staff, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment reviewed January 2025, showed the facility's average daily census was 120. The facility admitted more acutely ill residents with multiple co-morbidities (two or more medical conditions) and was able to provide care for residents who required total parental nutrition (TPN, liquid nutrition provided into the bloodstream), respiratory care, intravenous (IV) medications, and wound care. Staff completed routine competency checks to ensure staff could provide care to the facility population to include infection prevention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications were tracked, and controlled medications for discharged residents were discarded, in 1 of 2 medication rooms (North Hall) inspected. This failure placed the facility at risk for drug diversion. Findings included . On [DATE] at 8:40 AM, the North Hall medication room was inspected with Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse/ Resident Care Manager (LPN/RCM.) In the locked narcotic box in the refrigerator, the following medications were found for two residents: Resident 999 1) an unopened, full sealed bottle of liquid Morphine (a narcotic pain medication) that was filled on [DATE]. 2) an unopened, full sealed bottle of liquid Lorazepam (a controlled anti-anxiety medication) that was filled on [DATE]. 3) a medication card contained 10 Dronabinol 5 milligram (mg) capsules (used to treat nausea and stimulate appetite) was filled on [DATE] and had expired on [DATE]. Resident 998 4) an unopened, full sealed bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and monitor target behaviors for the use of psychoactive (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior and are typically used to treat mental health conditions) medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 6 and 411), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse consequences related to the use of the medications. Findings included . <Resident 6> A 10/2022 facility policy titled Psychoactive Medications showed, the facility reviewed the use of psychoactive drugs and behaviors associated with the use of the drugs quarterly. The facility evaluated the number of targeted behaviors or symptoms, the effectiveness of the medication, potential side effects, and supporting diagnoses for the use of psychoactive medications. Review of a 02/17/2025 admission assessment showed Resident 6 admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the provider's order for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 95 and 102) reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, multiple doses of a medication that treated Resident 95's lupus (the body's immune system attacks it's own healthy tissues causing pain and swelling) were omitted. Additionally, medication to control Resident 102's heart rate was not held when hold parameters were met. This failure placed the residents at risk for unintended health consequences from omitted doses, and medication side effects when medications were not held as ordered. Findings included . <Resident 95> A review of the 02/14/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 95 had diagnoses that included lupus and drug-induced suppression of the immune system. Resident 95 was cognitively intact and frequently had pain that interfered with therapy and day-to-day activities. The 11/19/2024 care plan documented Resident 95 was at risk for pain and discomfort. Staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the required qualifications (current Washington State Food Worker Cards) for 1 of 14 dietary staff (Staff Z), whose records were reviewed. This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings included . On 02/28/2025, a copy of dietary staff's current Washington State Food Worker cards were requested. Review of dietary cards on 02/28/2025 at 3:25 PM showed no documentation Staff Z, Dietary Manager/Registered Dietician, had a Food Workers Card, as required. Staff Z acknowledged they did not have a Washington State Food Worker card. In a follow-up interview on 03/06/2025 at 10:53 AM, Staff Z confirmed they were required to obtain the Washington State Food Worker card. Staff Z further stated it was important because it showed proof of competency and knowledge of dietary operations. Reference WAC 388-97-1160. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 104) whose discharge records reviewed. Specifically, Resident 104 was sent to the local hospital for urgent treatment and the medical record did not include events leading to the resident's decline and need for transfer. This failure created a risk for incomplete sharing of vital information with care givers across levels of care and lack of evidence of care provided. Findings included . A review of the 01/30/2025 five-day assessment documented Resident 104 had diagnoses that included stroke and difficult swallowing. Resident 104 required substantial staff assistance for their activities of daily living and was able to make decisions regarding their care. On 03/03/2025 at 9:07 AM, it was observed that Resident 104 was not present in their room and the nursing unit. When asked, Staff Y, Nursing Assistant, stated they heard Resident 104 had been vomiting blood and was sent to the hospital, but they were unsure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were educated regarding the risks and benefits of and provided the COVID (a highly contagious viral illness that caused fever, breathing difficulty and potential hospitalization) vaccine if desired, and failed to ensure minimum documentation was maintained regarding staff COVID vaccination status for 1 of 1 sampled staff (Staff P) reviewed. This failure placed staff and residents at risk of exposure to and illness from COVID-19. Findings included . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule 2025 for ages 19 years or older retrieved from www.cdc.gov/acip-recs/hcp/vaccine-specific/ documented adults age [AGE]-64 years, or adults age [AGE] or older who were unvaccinated for COVID-19, were recommended to receive 1 or 2 doses (dependent on the vaccine brand) of COVID-19 vaccine unless contraindicated. Those previously vaccinated before 2024-2025 were recommended to receive 1 or 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that ensured a resident's abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs) did not diminish for 2 of 45sampled residents (Resident 1 and 3), reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure put residents at risk for physical decline and decreased quality of life. Findings Included . <Resident 1> Per the admission assessment dated [DATE] Resident 1 admitted to the facility for therapy services after a fracture (arm). The assessment documented the resident required extensive staff assistance to perform ADLs. Review of the 11/06/2024 care plan showed Resident 1 was to work with therapies to meet goals of improvement in their functional abilities. Review of a physical therapy discharge summary, signed 12/06/2024, showed Resident 1 met one out of three short-term goals and zero out of three long-term goals. Per the summary the resident was referred to the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP; nursing interventions that promote the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication management. The failure to ensure medications were acquired and administered as ordered placed residents at risk for adverse events related to missed medications. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the 11/15/2024 care plan showed Resident 1 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (((a mental disorder characterized by symptoms of both schizophrenia (hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking) and a mood disorder (bouts of mania and depression))). In a telephone interview on 01/08/2025 at 11:09 AM with Staff C, Physican Assistant, they stated that they were the provider in the facility who worked with residents who used medications for psychological diagnoses requiring medication managment. They further stated that they had worked with Resident 1 since shortly after they admitted . Staff C stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 8) and their representatives and medical provider, reviewed for notification of changes, received timely notification of an incident. This failure placed the resident at risk of delayed access to care, inability to participate in care planning, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a 09/19/2024 facility investigation report showed Resident 8 was found in Resident 1's bed at 9:40 PM the previous evening. Per the report, Resident 8 was fully dressed but Resident 1 was undressed and both residents had diagnoses of dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities). Resident 8 was interviewed in their primary language the next morning and reported that Resident 1 brought them into Resident 1's room, encouraged them into bed, attempted to remove their clothes, and laid down next to them in bed. The report showed Resident 8's representatives and the medical provider were notified of the incident but did not include the date and time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse, for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 8), reviewed for abuse. The failure to provide timely follow-up medical care and to preserve potential evidence placed the resident at risk of unidentified abuse. Findings included . Review of a 09/19/2024 facility investigation report showed Resident 8 was found in Resident 1's bed at 9:40 PM the previous evening. Per the report, Resident 8 was fully dressed but Resident 1 was undressed and both residents had diagnoses of dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities). Resident 1 was unable to give a statement about the incident due to their cognitive deficits. Resident 8 was not interviewed until the following morning. Resident 8 was interviewed in their primary language and denied sexual assault but was transferred to the hospital for additional examination due to the potential for sexual assault. In an interview on 10/01/2024 at 2:36 PM a representative for Resident 8 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the resident, their representative, and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 10), reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk of not having the opportunity to make informed decisions about transfers/discharges. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Notice of Transfer or Discharge, adopted on 08/01/2024, showed the facility would notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in a written notice using the Resident Notice of Transfer or Discharge. In the case of an emergency transfer, the written notice would be issued as soon as practical. Additionally, the facility would send a copy of the notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Review of the 09/12/2024 admission assessment showed Resident 10 had cognitive impairments and physical behaviors that impacted their care one-to-three-days of the assessment period. Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 8 and 12), reviewed for meal intake, received assistance setting up their meals and continued supervision and cueing while eating. This failure placed the residents at risk of decreased dietary intake, potential weight loss, and decreased quality of life. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 8, 1, and 5), reviewed for bathing, received the assistance they required with baths and/or showers. This failure placed the residents at risk for skin breakdown, discomfort, and diminished quality of life. Findings included <Resident 8> Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 8 had impairments to upper and lower extremities and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as eating, transferring and bathing. Per the assessment, the resident did not refuse care. Review of the care plan dated 08/09/2024 showed staff were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to respond to call lights timely and to meet the care needs of 6 of 13 sampled residents (Residents 13, 8, 3, 4, 5, and 12), reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. This failure resulted in feelings of frustration and vulnerability, diminished quality of life and unmet care needs of the residents. Findings included . <Resident 13> Observation on 08/16/2024 at 12:25 PM showed Resident 13 was sitting in their wheelchair in the doorway of their room with the call light activated. The resident was looking up and down the hallway and muttering to themself. At 12:56 PM the resident's call light was still activated and the resident wheeled themself to the nurse's medication cart and asked when staff would be available to assist them into bed to use the bedpan. The resident stated they had been waiting more than 45 minutes and were beginning to become nauseous due to their gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), told Resident 13 that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure significant medications were given as ordered for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3, 4, 5), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk for worsening of their medical conditions and unintended consequences. Findings included . <Resident 3> Per the 07/27/2024 hospital transition of care orders Resident 3 had the following medication orders: -an oral antibiotic, cephalexin 500 mg (milligrams), four times daily for seven days for a skin infection to their left lower leg -requip (medication to treat restless legs and neurological disorders) 3mg at bedtime -amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant) 25mg at bedtime -gabapentin 300mg three times daily (drug that affects chemicals and nerves involved in seizures and pain) Review of Resident 3's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed no administration of any medications. Review of the July 2024 progress notes showed Resident 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide personal privacy for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 5 and 8), reviewed for dignity. Failure to ensure the residents' personal privacy placed them at risk for lack of dignity and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 8> In an interview on 08/15/2024 at 1:17 PM, Collateral Contact (CC) 1 stated when visitors came in to see Resident 8 they found the resident obviously soaked in urine on two separate occasions. Observation on 08/16/2024 at 12:42 PM showed Resident 8 was in bed covered with a blanket. Staff O, Physical Therapist, came into the resident's room and invited the resident to go to the therapy gym for a therapy session. Staff O pulled back the blankets which revealed Resident 8 was lying in a large puddle of fluid that was clearly visible on the front and back of their shirt and pants. A strong odor of urine was present. Staff O stated the resident needed assistance from nursing staff then went out into the hallway and immediately returned with a non-mechanical lift for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential misappropriation were reported immediately to administration and the State Agency as required, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for possible misappropriation. Findings included . Review of Resident 4's July 2024 progress notes showed an entry on 07/07/2024 by Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse, which documented an allegation that Staff I, Registered Nurse, had misappropriated oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) from an unknown resident and administered it to Resident 4, due to lack of availability of Resident 4's medication from the pharmacy. The note showed Resident 4's pain was discussed with Staff B, Director of Nursing, but did not document whether Staff B was notified of the allegation of misappropriation. Review of the facility's Incident Log for July 2024 did not show any entries related to Resident 4 and/or any entries of misappropriation for any resident. In an interview on 09/04/2024 at 11:45 AM, Staff B, Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary wound care supplies were available and staff were knowledgeable in their use for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] showed Resident 4 had multiple abdominal surgeries and discharged with two surgical drains (to remove fluid from a wound) to the abdomen. The resident was to discharge to a skilled nursing facility as they were not safe to return home. Per the 07/07/2024 skilled nursing facility transfer orders Resident 4 was to have negative pressure wound therapy (wound vacuum) to their abdominal incision continuously. Review of the July 2024 progress notes showed Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a specialty dressing intended for use with a wound vacuum but did not have a wound vacuum machine. Per the notes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 8), reviewed for accident hazards and staff supervision, were safely transferred with via the assistance devices and staff supervision level they were assessed to need. This placed the resident at risk for injury, decreased sense of safety and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 08/13/2024 admission assessment showed Resident 8 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia (one sided paralysis or weakness) and was dependent upon staff for transfers. Review of the care plan initiated 08/06/2024 showed staff were to transfer Resident 8 via a total body mechanical lift and assistance of two staff. The care plan included that the resident had weak legs. In an interview on 08/15/2024 at 1:17 PM, Collateral Contact (CC) 1 stated an unidentified staff member transferred Resident 8 from their wheelchair into their bed with a mechanical sit-to-stand lift and no additional staff assistance. CC1 stated the resident had not been strapped into the lift properly and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals with assistive devices in the correct position for use for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 8), reviewed for meal service. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased meal intake, loss of dignity, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 08/13/20204 admission assessment showed Resident 8 had an impairment in mobility to their upper extremity and were dependent upon staff for eating assistance. Review of Resident 8's care plan for nutrition and activities of daily living (ADLs), initiated 08/06/2024, showed a goal of no further avoidable decline in ADLs and an intervention of staff to provide supervision and cues when the resident ate. There was no instruction to staff on how to maintain/encourage independence with eating for Resident 8 and/or assistive devices the resident utilized with their meals. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 11:04 AM Collateral Contact (CC) 1 stated Resident 8 was not receiving adequate assistance with eating and was not provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place in which residents' records were complete and accurate for 1 of 11 sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility failed to ensure the medical record included medications administered for pain control immediately prior to a transfer to a hospital for pain control. Failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records placed the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Resident 4's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 showed no medications were administered to the resident on 07/07/2024. An order for oxycodone 5 mg (milligrams) one to two tablets every four hours as needed for pain was present on the MAR, but not administrations were documented. There was no order for acetaminophen on the MAR. Review of the July 2024 progress notes showed a note which documented Staff I, Registered Nurse, administered a pill in a cup to Resident 4 on 07/07/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one randomly observed staff (Staff L) wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for prevention of spread of COVID-19 (a disease with a wide range of symptoms ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus). This failure placed residents (facility census 108) and staff at risk for spread of a contagious disease. Findings included . Review of the CDC guidelines titled, Infection Control Guidance: SARS-CoV-2, updated 06/24/2024, showed staff working on a unit or area of a facility experiencing a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak should use source control (face mask or respirator to cover a person's mouth and nose to prevent spread of respiratory secretions). Additionally, staff who entered the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should use a N95 respirator (instead of source control), gown, gloves and eye protection. Review of a document titled, COVID, dated 08/08/2024, provided by Staff F,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care planning. This failure left the resident at risk for unmet needs, falls and fall related injuries. Findings included . Review of the fall prevention care plan revised 01/25/2024 showed staff were to keep Resident 1's call light was in reach, provide a Paddle-style call light for ease of use, and place a fall mat at the bedside when the resident was in bed. Observation on 02/16/2024 at 2:51 PM showed Resident 1 was in bed with a standard call light, a bedside table with personal items next to the bed, and no fall mat. A similar observation was made on 02/29/2024 at 2:37 PM. The care planned interventions of the specialty paddle-style call light and fall mat at bedside were not observed on either date. In an interview on 02/29/2024 at 2:41 PM Staff G, Nursing Assistant, stated they were responsible for Resident 1's care that day but did not know whether their care planned interventions to prevent falls were in place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three staff members (Staff F and G), reviewed for competency, were evaluated by the facility for competency with skills and techniques upon hire. This failure placed residents at risk to receive substandard care. Findings included . Review of Staff F's employee file showed Staff F, Nursing Assistant, was hired on 07/17/2023 and had no documentation showing their competency with skills and techniques were assessed. Review of Staff G's employee file showed Staff G, Nursing Assistant, was hired on 09/20/2023 and had no documentation showing their competency with skills and techniques were assessed prior to 01/22/2024. The employee file showed Staff G was assessed for skill competency related to resident transfers only on 01/22/2024 (after an incident involving Staff G improperly transferring a resident; see F-689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision for more information). In an interview on 02/29/2024 at 2:41 PM Staff G stated they got training if they asked for it and were oriented to the facility when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 2 of 4 sampled residents (62,35) during 4 medication passes observed. Specifically, 3 errors were made during 27 medication administration opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 11.11 percent. Errors in medication administration placed residents at potential risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication. Findings included . <Resident 62> During an observation on 12/18/2023 at 6:12 AM, Staff J, Registered Nurse, prepared medications for Resident 62. The medications included a Bisacodyl suppository (a medication used to treat constipation) to be administered every morning. Staff J decided not to administer the suppository related to the resident had a bowel movement. The resident also had an order to check placement of their peg tube (a tube that is placed inside the stomach wall to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not possible). Staff J did not check placement of the tube per physician order. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms. Additionally, temperatures were not monitored consistently for refrigerators containing vaccines, narcotic books did not contain two verifying signatures that the count was correct, and insulin was expired and undated when opened. The facility further failed to ensure narcotics were locked in a permanently affixed narcotic container in 2 of 2 medication storage room refrigerators. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication and placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of narcotic medications. Findings included . According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), vaccines should be stored between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and failure to do so reduced or destroyed their potency, resulting in inadequate or no immune response in the recipient. During observation of the north…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, perishable foods were not labeled with the opened on or discard date, expired foods were not discarded, refrigerator temperatures were not monitored, hand hygiene was not performed with glove changes, and facial hair was not covered in the food preparation area. These failures placed residents at risk for consuming contaminated foods and food-borne illness. Findings included . On 12/11/2023 at 9:05 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with Staff Y, Food Service Manager, the following observations were made: In the dry storage area, the following items were opened and partially used, but were not labeled with an opened on or use by date. 1) Cream Soup base 2) [NAME] style cooking wine, 1 gallon 3) Light molasses, 1 gallon 4) Worchestershire sauce, 1 gallon 5) [NAME] cooking wine, 1 gallon 6) Vegetable oil, 1 gallon 7) White cooking wine, 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system for identifying, investigating and reporting infectious diseases for 1 of 5 sampled residents (82) reviewed for tuberculosis (TB) screening (a bacterial infectious disease spread through contact with or breathing in particles coughed into the air) and failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed when indicated during observations of three medication passes, one dressing change, and two meals in the South unit dining room. This failure placed residents at risk for spread of infectious illnesses and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (TB) in Healthcare Settings, 2005 retrieved 01/02/2024 from http://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/infectioncontrol/TBhealthCareSettings.htm documented primary tuberculosis (TB) risk to others was the undiagnosed or unsuspected patient with infectious TB. A high index…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to preserve a resident's dignity for 1 of 2 sampled residents (10) reviewed. Failure to ensure signage regarding Resident 10's personal care was not hung in public view placed Resident 10 at risk for embarassment and decreased quality of life. Findings included . According to a quarterly assessment completed on 11/09/2023, Resident 10 was severely cognitively impaired and required total assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Physicians Order dated 05/17/2023 instructed nursing staff to monitor redness on Resident 10's left buttock. During an observation on 12/11/2023 at 9:11 AM, a sign hung to the right of Resident 10's bed documented to apply Calazyme (a skin protectant that repels moisture) to the resident's buttocks for bed sores. The sign was highlighted in a bright yellow color, decorated with hearts, and included Resident 10's name at the bottom. The sign was in view of Resident 10's roommate or any visitors that came into the room. During subsequent observations on 12/13/2023 at 9:10 AM, 12/13/2023 at 10:43 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care planned goals and interventions for 3 of 27 sampled residents (82, 53 and 81) reviewed and failed to ensure the care plan was implemented by staff for 1 of 27 sampled residents (81) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident 82 was dependent on dialysis (a way of removing waste from the body when kidneys no longer function). Residents 53 and 80 had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, condition triggered when one expierienced or witnessed shocking or terrifying events). These residents had no goals or interventions developed related to these diagnoses. Also, Resident 81 had a history of falling and their call bell was not left within their reach as care-planned. These failures left residents at risk for unmet needs, and at risk for fall related injuries. Findings included <Resident 82> An 11/27/2023 admission assessment documented Resident 82 had diagnoses including end-stage renal (kidney) failure dependent on dialysis. The resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 of 27 sampled residents (62) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident 62's care plan did not reflect that they were not to have their nutrition by mouth. This failures placed the resident at risk for adverse events related to receiving the wrong therapies. Findings included . <Resident 62> According to a 10/11/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 62 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Accident (stroke) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). The assessment showed Resident 62 had moderately impaired cognitive skills. Review of the nursing progress notes from 10/12/2023 through 10/20/2023 documented the resident was admitted to the hospital and upon readmission to the facility, was not to have any food/fluids by mouth. According to the October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR), Resident 62 was to receive nothing by mouth, and medication was to be administered through a gastrostomy tube, (G-Tube, a tube that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled residents (16) reviewed for activities, received an ongoing program of activities that met their interests. This failure placed the resident at risk for boredom and diminished quality of life. Findings included Per the 09/30/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 16 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses which included macular degeneration (an eye disease that caused vision loss). The assessment showed it was very important to the resident to be involved in activities that included: books, newspapers, and magazines to read. Review of Resident 16's care plan, showed they were dependent for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to their disease process and staff would offer opportunities to engage in planned group/social activities as well as material to self-engage. The goal for Resident 16 was to participate in activities of choice one to three times weekly. The interventions were to provide the resident with books on tape, assist with tapes, and to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents environment remained free of accident hazards, and that 1 of 5 sampled residents (29), reviewed for accidents/hazards, received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, hazardous chemicals and materials were not secured on 5 of 5 halls where residents could access them, treatment and medication carts were left unlocked and unsupervised. In addition, Resident 29 had unsecured cigarettes and a lighter in a pouch on their wheelchair. These failures placed the residents at a potential risk of harm related to avoidable incidents. Findings included . <200 Hall Shower Room> On 12/11/2023 at 10:49 AM, a gallon container labeled ZEPS (a cleaning product) was observed in the unlocked 200 Hall shower room. An unnamed Nursing Assistant (NA) stated that the shower door was usually locked. A similar observation on 12/12/2023 at 11:30 AM, showed the door to the shower room remained unlocked. There were no residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that had significant weight loss were reassessed by the Registered Dietician (RD) timely for 2 of 6 sampled residents (10, 62) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for further undesired weight loss, and a decline in their health. Findings included . <Resident 10> According to a quarterly assessment completed on 11/09/2023, Resident 10 had diagnoses including dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), stroke and anxiety. Resident 10 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance of one for eating and had significant weight loss not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. A review of the resident weights showed the following weights for Resident 10: -6/4/2023 140 pounds (lbs.), -09/03/2023 142 lbs., -11/08/2023 121 lbs., -12/12/2023 124 lbs., a -12.68% loss in 3 months and -11.43% loss in 6 months. The 12/06/2023 Nutritional Risk assessment showed Resident 10 had significant weight loss, they ate 0-25% of their meals and occasionally consumed nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of care for 1 of 2 residents (62) reviewed for tube feedings. Specifically Resident 62 experienced vomiting and failure of staff to check gastric residual volumes (GRV - fluid/contents that remain undisgested in the stomach) prior to tube feeding administration. This failure placed the resident at risk for weight loss, continued vomiting, medical complications, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the comprehensive care plan dated 05/11/2022, showed Resident 62 had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and received 100% of their nutrition and hydration through use of a tube feeding. Review of the medical record showed there were no orders that directed staff to check for GRV prior to the initiation of tube feeding, what an acceptable GRV was for Resident 62, or when to notify the physician when the GRV exceeded the acceptable range. During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 10:43 AM, Staff L, Resident Care Manager, stated there should have been an order to check for GRV as this was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen delivery equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (16, 40) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications and infection. Findings included . <Resident 16> Per the 09/30/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 16 had diagnoses which included heart failure (when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should), circulation problems, lung disease, and needed oxygen due to those conditions. Review of the physician orders showed on 03/03/2020, the resident had been prescribed oxygen to be used continuously, due to the heart and lung conditions listed above. The 04/02/2020 respiratory care plan showed no direction for cleaning oxygen filters on the oxygen concentrator, a machine that delivers oxygen to the resident. On 12/11/2023 at 9:14 AM, Resident 16 was observed wearing oxygen while lying in bed. An inspection of the oxygen concentrator in the resident's room showed the concentrator was unclean with thick…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered for 1 of 6 sampled residents (53) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed Resident 53 at risk for worsening depression and adverse health consequences when they missed doses of their medications. Findings included . <Resident 53> A review of the 11/29/2023 quarterly assessment documented Resident 53 had diagnoses including general anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, trauma from experienced stressful or terrifying events), and high cholesterol and was cognitively intact. On 12/13/2023 at 9:52 AM, Resident 53 was observed to keep their door closed. Upon entrance, Resident 53 was observed sitting on their bed organizing personal bank items. Resident 53 rocked back and forth during conversation. Resident 53 stated they went to a friend's house and stayed until midnight most nights because they did not sleep well. Resident 53 stated that usually upon return to the facility, their nighttime medications were brought in for them to take.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate licensing necessary to carry out the functions of the nutritional services for 92 residents. Specifically, the Registered Dietician (RD) did not have a license to practice in Washington State. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and possible unintended weight loss or gain. Findings included . A review of staff credentials showed that Staff R, Registered Dietician (RD), had successfully completed requirements for dietetic registration through the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Commission on Dietetic Registration, with a certificate valid through 08/31/2024. A copy of Staff R's license to practice in Washington State was also requested and none was provided. A search of the Washington State Department of Health Provider Credential database could not confirm that Staff R had a Dietician Certification (license) necessary for practice in Washington State. During an interview on 12/19/2023 at 1:07 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they requested a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and/or accurately document condition changes for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3). These failures placed residents at risk of potential medical complications, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of Resident 2's medical record showed they admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure (the inability of the heart to beat effectively resulting in fluid buildup in the body), edema (swelling), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are not able to filter toxins and fluids as they normally would) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] (treatable disease characterized by progressive breathlessness and cough). The record also showed the resident was a full code (indicating they would like all life saving measures performed in case of a medical emergency). Review of Resident 2's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an order to complete a Heart Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consistently monitor tolerance to dialysis (procedure to remove fluid and waste from the body when the kidneys stop working properly) treatments for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for dialysis care. In addition, the facility failed to communicate and collaborate care with the dialysis center. These failures placed residents at risk of unrecognized complications, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis-Provision of Care by Outside Providers, revised 02/2019, showed communication would exist between the dialysis center and the facility with an interchange of information necessary for the care of the resident. Review of the facility policy titled, Hemodialysis Care, revised 11/2023, showed residents who require hemodialysis were provided ongoing assessment and monitoring for complications of their condition before and after treatments. The policy further stated the licensed nurse was to complete the Dialysis Center Communication Form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe providers orders accurately and/or ensure residents routinely received their medications as ordered by the provider for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2), reviewed for significant medication errors. These failures placed residents at risk of potential adverse side effects, unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, revised 06/2019, showed medication and treatment orders would be entered into the electronic medical record completely and accurately exactly as ordered. The policy further showed orders would be reviewed for completeness and accuracy during the first week a resident was admitted . Standards of nursing care indicate medication should be administered as ordered by the prescribing provider. <Resident 1> According to the 05/26/2023 admission assessment, Resident 1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of diabetes, heart failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of personal property and funds for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 2, 4, and 7), reviewed for misappropriation. This failure placed residents at risk for missing property, missing funds, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse - Screening, Training, Identification, Investigation, Reporting, and Protection, revised January 2023, showed misappropriation definitions included the deliberate use of a resident's resources for personal profit or gain, and borrowing or spending resident funds. Exploitation was defined as taking advantage of a resident for personal gain. <Resident 2> Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on e week prior to the assessment date (08/15/20023) with diagnoses of stroke and dementia. The assessment showed the resident had weakness to one side of their body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the spread of communicable disease during a COVID-19 (an infectious disease causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise [a general feeling of discomfort/uneasiness]) outbreak on 2 of 2 affected units (200 & 300 halls). This failure placed residents at risk of contracting a communicable disease. Findings included . Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 05/08/2023, respirators or well fitting face masks to cover a person's mouth and nose to prevent spread of respiratory secretions when they are breathing, talking, sneezing, or coughing should be worn by those working on a unit or area of the facility experiencing a COVID-19 or other outbreak of respiratory infection until no new cases of infection have been identified for 14 days. Additionally, the facility should perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one staff member (Staff G) timely reported allegations of staff misappropriation of resident property, as required. This failure placed residents at risk of misappropriation and exploitation. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse - Screening, Training, Identification, Investigation, Reporting, and Protection, revised January 2023, showed any staff member observing staff to resident exploitation or misappropriation of resident property would immediately remove the resident from the situation and report to administrative personnel. If the allegation included misappropriation of resident property, the incident would be reported to local law enforcement and the State Survey Agency within 24 hours. Review of the care plan revised 06/24/2023 showed Resident 7 was at risk of altered mental status due to delirium, opioid use, and Parkinson's with a psychotic disorder with delusions. In an interview on 10/12/2023 at 3:31 PM, Staff G, Nursing Assistant, stated they started working at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate 1 of 3 (Resident 2) allegations of misappropriation of resident property. This failure placed residents at risk of unidentified misappropriation and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility investigation dated 09/13/2023 showed a representative for Resident 2 reported the resident was missing a medical alert necklace, which had been removed from the resident by Staff C, Social Services, while the resident was at the facility. The investigation included a typed summary by Staff B, Director of Nursing, which documented both Staff C and Staff D, Social Services, were interviewed, as well as unidentified nurses and nursing assistants, who worked on the same hall the resident resided on, as well as a list of residents. Neither the staff member nor the resident statements, including date and time of the interviews or specific statements made, were included. Additionally, the interviewed parties did not include Staff F, Transport Staff, the first person to see the resident during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 sample residents (Resident 1), reviewed for skin conditions, received appropriate monitoring and nursing care related to skin care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified wounds, unmet care needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Skin at Risk/Skin Breakdown, revised September 2020, showed a licensed nurse was to examine a resident's entire body within 8 hours of admission, to determine if skin impairment was present. Additionally, a full body skin evaluation was to be completed and documented weekly by the licensed nurse. Per the admission assessment dated [DATE], Resident 1 admitted to the facility from a hospital one week prior and required limited to extensive assistance of 1-2 staff for dressing, toileting, hygiene and bathing. The assessment also showed the resident had no behaviors of rejecting care. Review of the July 2023 Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-17 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 sample residents (36, 16, 44, 83), reviewed for hospitalization, were given a written copy of a bed-hold notice prior to or within 24-hours of an emergency transfer to the hospital, as required. This failure created the potential for residents and/or their responsible parties to not have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold (revised March 2019) read, Policy. The resident and or resident representative will be informed of this policy in writing upon admission, transfer or leave of absence. If unable to provide at the time of transfer or leave of absence, the policy will be provided within 24 hours. Review of the record showed Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), and a psychotic disorder with delusions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 9 sample residents (8, 36, 43, 68, 74), who were dependent on staff for care, received appropriate care and services related to hair removal and bathing. Failure to provide necessary care and services to dependent residents placed them at risk for embarrassment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 05/04/2022 quarterly assessment, Resident 8 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness, history of a stroke, and a cognitive communication deficit. Additionally, the assessment showed the resident required extensive, one person physical assistance with personal hygiene. Per the resident's care plan dated 03/09/2022, staff were directed to provide physical assistance with bathing and personal hygiene, which included shaving. During an observation on 06/14/2022 at 10:23 AM, Resident 8 was sitting in a common area of the facility in a wheelchair. The resident had very long nostril hair, protruding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate a mechanical lift failure involving 1 sample resident (10); to ensure the smoking area on the rehabilitation unit was equipped with a fire extinguisher; to ensure cigarette butts were disposed of in the appropriate containers.; and maintain fall interventions and ensure wheelchair armrests were in good condition for 1 sample resident (83). These failures placed the residents at risk for accidents and injuries (including burns). Findings included . Mechanical Lifts Review of the Resident 10's record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including morbid obesity. Review of the resident's significant change in condition assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating Resident 10 was cognitively intact. The assessment also showed the resident had experienced one fall with minor injury since the last assessment. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the oxygen concentrator filter (a type of medical device used for delivering oxygen to individuals), change nasal canula tubing (flexible tubing placed in the nose to administer oxygen), label the nasal cannula tubing, and cover nasal canula tubing when not in use according to the facility protocol, for 4 of 5 sample residents (36, 38, 34, 14), who required respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at increased risk for infection and unmet care needs. Findings included . The facility respiratory treatment policy, dated 03/31/2022, showed that oxygen concentrator filters were to be cleaned weekly. The task was documented on the treatment record and when oxygen was not in use, the nasal cannula and tubing were to be stored in a plastic or mesh bag. Review of Resident 36's record showed an admission date of 05/12/2022, with diagnosis including mild asthma and heart disease. Further review of the record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus and recipes were followed to ensure nutritional adequacy for 5 of 5 sample residents (439, 53, 68, 15, 64), observed in the 100-hall dining room. This failure had the potential to affect residents who received food from the kitchen, causing decreased quality of life and health complications to include weight loss. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Portion Size Adjustment, reviewed 05/2019, showed The standard menu lists regular size portions to be served unless otherwise indicated. Review of the facility's policy titled Menus, reviewed 02/2019, showed The menus serviced will meet the nutritional needs of the residents in accordance with established national guidelines .If there are changes to the menus, the changes must be written on all posted menus (production and resident) prior to services. Review of the facility's menu for breakfast on 06/16/2022 showed waffles, breakfast meat of choice, seasonal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served to the residents was palatable and at proper temperature for 13 of 13 sample residents (439, 85, 49, 8, 74, 29, 52, 11, 27, 34, 69, 15, 64) interviewed related to the food quality. This failure placed the residents at decreased quality of life and potential weight loss. Findings included . Interview with the Staff B, Director of Nursing, on 06/16/2022 at 3:09 PM showed the facility did not have any policies related to food palatability. During an interview on 06/14/2022 at 9:43 AM, Resident 439 stated the meals were terrible, stating the menu was repetitive and there was not enough food. During an interview on 06/14/2022 at 10:02 AM, Resident 85 stated the food was inedible the day before. Resident 85 stated the ice cream was melted, and they consistently ran out of snacks. During an interview on 06/14/2022 at 10:47 AM, Resident 49 stated the food did not look good or taste good. During an interview on 06/14/2022 at 11:06 AM, Resident 8 stated the food was not good. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one facility kitchens. This failure had the potential to affect all residents that received food from the kitchen. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Discard Date, reviewed 02/2019, showed Leftover food that is to be reused will be wrapped, covered with plastic wrap or placed in a suitable NSF [National Sanitation Foundation] approved plastic container and stored in the appropriate manner. Review of the facility's policy titled Bare Hand Contact, reviewed 02/2019, showed It is the policy of our facility to NOT allow bare hand and arm contact with all food. In an interview with Staff B, Director of Nursing, on 06/16/2022 at 3:09 PM, showed the facility did not have any policies related to box storage in the refrigerator/freezer walk-ins. During an observation on 06/14/2022 at 8:44 AM, the walk-in refrigerator had one plate of salad, uncovered; one metal pan with cooked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified quality deficiencies and developed, implemented, and maintained corrective actions that ensured ongoing compliance with federal regulations. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving care and services for optimal resident outcomes. Findings included Per documentation provided by the facility on 06/14/2022, the facility had a census of 99 residents. On 06/17/2022 at 10:30 AM, an interview was completed with Staff A, Administrator, and Staff B, Director of Nursing, regarding the facility's QAPI program. Staff A stated the facility had a QAPI committee, and meetings were held at least quarterly with the required members. The following deficiencies were identified by the survey team during the Long Term Care Survey Process, and were not identified by the facility, until brought to their attention by the survey team: Notice of Bed-Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer See F625 for additional information. When Staff A was asked if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate 1 of 2 sample residents (11), reviewed for choices, related to when they could get out of bed to smoke. This failure placed the resident at risk of decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in March 2021, with a diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs). The most recent comprehensive assessment, dated 03/12/2022, showed that the resident was cognitively intact and able to make their needs known. Resident 11 required staff assistance to get into their wheelchair, but were independent with mobility once in their chair. A 03/19/2022 Smoking Safety Evaluation showed that the resident was safe to smoke independently. A review of the record showed that the resident had fallen on 05/10/2022. A further review of the fall report investigation from the same date showed a recommendation for two people to assist with transfers to and from the wheelchair, and the resident's care plan was updated with that information. During an interview on 06/14/2022 at 3:30 PM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of property was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 sample residents (22), reviewed for abuse, out of a total sample of 42 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for additional incidents of misappropriation. Findings included . Review of the facility's Abuse policy, revised February 2019, read, Policy- It is the policy of this center to: . 4) investigate allegations of abuse . 6) Protect our residents from abuse. Procedure to include Prevention, Investigation, and Protection . 6. Facility shall utilize Incident/ Accident Investigation policy and procedure to investigate concerns and incidents. The investigations will include but not limited to the following: a. All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and or/financial exploitation or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated . b. A thorough investigation is completed through a systematic collection and review of evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide required transfer notices for 2 of 4 sample residents (36, 83), reviewed for hospitalization. The facility failed to provide the resident and/or their representative a written notice at the time the resident was transferred to the hospital, and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Ombudsman (a person who investigates complaints and/or concerns related to care and services in a nursing home), as required. Findings included . Per record review, Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), and a psychotic disorder with delusions (a mental illness in which the person has an unshakable belief in something untrue). Review of a 02/08/2022 progress note showed the resident was sent to the hospital with increased blood pressure, diaphoresis (profuse sweating), and chest pain. Further review of the record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a comprehensive assessment (an assessment tool used to identify a resident's care needs), for 1 of 3 sample residents (4), reviewed for assessments. Failure to accurately assess the resident related to hearing loss, placed the resident at risk for feelings of isolation, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Per the 06/05/2022 annual assessment, Resident 4 had diagnoses which included respiratory failure, and loss of vision. The assessment further showed the resident required extensive physical assistance with most activities of daily living. Under the communication and sensory evaluation of the same assessment, the resident was assessed as having adequate hearing, with no use of hearing aids. During an observation and interview on 06/14/2022 at 9:18 AM, hearing aids were in a box on Resident #4's beside table. The resident stated the hearing aids didn't work and needed repaired. A review of the care plan dated 02/25/2021, showed there was no care plan in place related to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and follow a comprehensive activity plan, that met specific resident interests and needs, and to promote well-being, for 3 of 7 sample residents (71, 12, 83), reviewed for activities. This failure placed the residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and unmet needs. Findings included . Per record review, Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a condition that makes it hard to remember, think clearly and make decisions), anxiety, and depression. The most recent comprehensive assessment, dated 05/06/2022, showed that Resident 71 had moderately impaired cognition, but was able to understand and be understood. The resident had impaired vision and used a walker or wheelchair with assistance. The document further showed that music, pets/animals, keeping up with the news, going outside when the weather was good, and religious services were all very important to the resident. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a central intravenous (IV) catheter - a thin flexible tube inserted into a vein, which is then guided into a large vein above the right side of the heart - had dressing changes as ordered by the physician for 1 of 5 sample residents (340), reviewed during medication administration. This failure placed the resident at risk for infection at the insertion site. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated IV Catheter Insertion and Care Policy showed . Central and Midline Dressing Changes: Central and Midline catheter dressings will be changed at specified intervals, or when needed, to prevent catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened, or soiled catheter site dressings . Review of the undated admission Record, showed Resident 340 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis (bone infection). An admission assessment had not yet been completed, but per interview,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sample residents (43), reviewed for positioning and range of motion, received services to prevent a further decrease in range of motion for a hand contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to rigidity of joints), through use of a hand brace. This failure placed the resident at increased risk for a worsening contracture, potential decrease in range of motion, and skin integrity issues. Findings included . Per the quarterly assessment dated [DATE], Resident 43 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (cerebral palsy is a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). Additionally, the assessment showed the resident had right sided upper body mobility limitations. During an observation on 06/14/2022 at 10:57 AM, Resident 43 was seated in a wheelchair in their room. The resident's right hand and wrist were curled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, or to monitor weight consistently, for 2 of 6 sample residents (439, 10), reviewed for nutritional status. This failure resulted in significant weight loss for Resident 439, and placed Resident 10 at risk for nutritional compromise and weight loss. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Monitoring and Documentation, revised 03/2019, showed, It is the policy of this facility to monitor nutrition parameters, including weights. In an interview with Staff B, Director of Nursing, on 06/16/2022 at 3:09 PM, showed the facility did not have any other policies related to nutritional status. Per record review, Resident 439 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of right hip fracture, macular degeneration (vision loss), vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent aspiration for 1 of 2 sample residents (83), reviewed for tube feeding. This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications and a decline in condition. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy Gastrostomy Feeding Tube, undated, showed the resident's head of bed should be elevated a minimum of 30-45 degrees during administration of enteral feeding (providing nutrition through a tube into the stomach), and for at least 30 minutes following administration. Should the resident be required to be in the supine position for any reason during a tube feeding, the tube feeding shall be stopped and then restarted once the procedure is completed. If the resident's clinical condition warrants supine or a position less than 30-45 degrees in elevation, this will be indicated on the resident's care plan . Review of the facility's policy Enteral Feeding Tubes, undated, showed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate behavior monitoring for 2 of 5 sample residents (9, 10), reviewed for unnecessary use of psychotropic medication drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary and/or ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's Psychoactive Medication Policy, revised in 05/2022, showed the resident's medication regimen should be free from unnecessary drugs and help to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. The policy also stated newly admitted residents and residents started on psychoactive medication would be placed on alert charting for monitoring behaviors and a behavior management plan would be initiated. Review of the Resident 10's admission record, dated 09/20/2017, showed the resident admitted with diagnoses including insomnia, anxiety, and major depression. Review of a 03/08/2022 significant change assessment showed Resident 10 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in a timely manner, there was a functioning call light in resident rooms occupied by 1 of 5 residents (4), reviewed for call light use. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, and the inability to call for assistance. Findings included . Per the annual assessment dated [DATE], Resident 4 had diagnoses which included respiratory failure, and loss of vision. The assessment further showed the resident required extensive physical assistance with most activities of daily living. During an observation and interview on 06/14/2022 at 9:18 AM, Resident 4 reported that the call light in their room would not work unless the call light in the bathroom was turned completely off. The resident stated the problem had been reported to maintenance. On 06/14/2022 at 9:30 AM, the survey team tested the call lights in all sample resident rooms. All other call lights were in working order. In an interview on 06/14/2022 at 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$126,188 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $100,282 — penalty dated 2024-09-09
  • $25,906 — penalty dated 2024-02-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/14/2024
DOWNING, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/14/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/14/2024
MORAN, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2026
ROBINSON, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2026
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
SPOKANE 14820 EAST REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 13%Other / private 21%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$439per resident / day
operating cost
$13,353per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$414per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505383. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next