Colonial Vista Post-Acute & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 304 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR)-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disabilities (ID), and related conditions were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care] had the required Level II referral sent when residents had a positive Level 1 PASARR and were an exempted hospital discharge (a process that allowed residents admission to a nursing facility from a hospital without undergoing the PASSAR screening when certain criteria were met) in the facility for more than 30 days for 4 of 7 residents (Resident 35, 64, 44 and 8) reviewed for PASARR. Additionally, the mental health diagnoses were not accurately documented on the PASARR Level I. These failures placed the residents at risk for inappropriate placement and not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included. Resident 35 Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities for 6 of 6 residents (Resident 74, 14, 66, 57, 15, and 69) reviewed for activities. This failure placed the residents at risk for dissatisfaction with their activity choices, poor psychosocial well-being, and boredom. Findings included. Resident 74 Review of the medial record showed Resident 74 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including poliomyelitis (an infection that affects nerves, brain and spinal cord and can result in loss of muscle functions), diabetes (a disease that results in excess sugar in the blood), and obesity. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 74 required total assistance of one to two staff members with activities of daily living (ADLs) and was cognitively intact. Resident 14 Review of the medical record showed Resident 14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes and kidney disease. The comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in a respectful and dignified manner for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 6 and 15) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for being treated with a lack of dignity, respect and embarrassment. Findings included . Review of the policy titled Activities of Daily Living dated 03/2021, showed residents would be provided with care, treatment, and services to ensure their ADLs were maintained and did not diminish. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently in accordance with the care plan including appropriate support with assistance with elimination (toileting), hygiene (dressing) and eating. Resident 6Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses including stroke (when blood stops flowing to part of your brain) and Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder where brain cells are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated and assessed for safe administration of medications for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 35 and 79), reviewed for self-medication administration. The failure to complete a self-administration of medication assessment placed the residents at risk for medication errors, adverse medication interactions, and complications. Findings included. Review of the policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised 02/2021, showed residents had the right to self-administer medications when the interdisciplinary team [(IDT) a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines to help people receive the care they need] determined it was safe and appropriate through an evaluation and assessment of the residents cognitive and physical abilities. The policy showed when a resident was identified as appropriate and safe to self-administer medications, it would be documented in the resident's medical record and care plan. Resident 35Review of the medical record showed Resident 35 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to use personal possessions in their room, specifically a personal refrigerator, for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 74 and 69) reviewed for resident rights. This failed practice placed the residents at risk of feeling like their rights had been taken away and emotional distress. Findings included . Resident 74Review of the medial record showed Resident 74 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including poliomyelitis (an infection that affects nerves, brain and spinal cord and can result in loss of muscle functions), diabetes (a disease that results in excess sugar in the blood), and obesity. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 74 required total assistance of one to two staff members with activities of daily living (ADLs) and was cognitively intact.Resident 69Review of the medical record showed Resident 69 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and indications for use was in place for psychotropic (drugs that affects how the brain works, and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings or behavior) medication management for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and adverse side effects. Findings included .Review of the policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication [used to treat mental health symptoms], dated 08/2024, showed nursing staff would observe and document information regarding the effectiveness of any antipsychotic medications. It further showed that nursing staff would review for appropriate indications for use for the drug, monitor for and report to the attending physician, side effects and adverse consequences.Resident 10Review of the medical record showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in mental ability, specifically affecting thinking, memory, and reasoning), depression (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during meals consistent with resident needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 15) reviewed for accidents and supervision. This failure placed Resident 15 at risk for choking and adverse health outcomes. Findings included. Resident 15 Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a disease due to abnormal brain development which causes disorders of movement, muscle tone and posture), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the Resident 15 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for dressing, grooming and personal hygiene however they were able to eat independently after their meal was set up. Review of a physician order dated 08/20/2025 showed Resident 15's diet was regular texture with soft bite sized pieces served with gravy or sauce to decrease choking risk and thin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was continent of bowel and bladder received services and assistance to maintain their continent status for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 19) reviewed for bowel and bladder function. Failure to identify the decline in bladder and bowel continence and assess/determine causative factors, left the resident at risk for continued decline, feelings of embarrassment, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Resident 19 Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory disease, diabetes, obesity, kidney disease, and depression. Resident 19's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed they required total assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and transfers with a mechanical lift and were cognitively intact. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 19 on 08/19/2025 at 10:40 AM, showed them lying in bed with only a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practices were followed; 1. During a facility COVID-19 (an infectious disease causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise [a general feeling of discomfort/uneasiness], headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak to mitigate the risk for transmission of COVID-19 on 1 of 3 halls (South Hall); 2. During a residents Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter [(PICC) a long thin tube inserted through a vein in an arm to the heart to administer fluids, medications, and blood draws] dressing change for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 79). These failures placed residents, staff and visitors at risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and the transmission of infectious diseases. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0560 — isolated
  Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' right to refuse a room transfer when their payor source changed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for choices. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for feeling vulnerable, disheartened and powerless. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy, titled Room Change/Roommate Assignment, showed residents had the right to refuse a room transfer if the purpose was to relocate a resident from a Skilled Nursing unit (a living unit with the focus of regaining strength, endurance and independence through the skilled services of nursing and therapy) to a Long-Term Care (LTC) unit [a living unit with the focus of being a home with staff assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) ongoing]. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of respiratory failure, diabetes (a condition that happens when the body can't use glucose [a type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-27 for 39 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA