Kingsburg Center
1101 Stroud Ave, Kingsburg, CA 93631 · For profit - Individual · 86 certified beds · (559) 897-5881 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.12 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.3%CMS range 45.3–64.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.6–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.8–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 79.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when nurses assessed both of Resident 1's legs as discolored and one leg as swollen on [DATE], contacted the physician for orders and did not follow physician's orders to obtain a vascular consult ordered on [DATE]. A Change in Condition (CIC- documentation completed when nurse's identify a change from a resident's baseline condition) was not completed on [DATE] due to the changes in Resident 1's legs. The nurse assessed Resident 1's left leg as more swollen than the right leg on [DATE] and failed to complete a CIC. A weekly head-to-toe assessment was done on [DATE] and should have been repeated on [DATE] and was not. These failures resulted in a delay in acting on Resident 1's symptoms, delayed treatment and care and contributed to an acute change of pain and swelling on [DATE] for which Resident 1 was transported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the food service manager met state requirements when the Dietary Account Manager (DAM) hired for this role did not meet the qualifications required for food service managers.This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for compromised food safety and inadequate oversight of dietary operations for the 75 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings: During a review of the California Health and Safety Code (HSC) 1265.4, dated 1/1/25, the California Health and Safety Code 1265.4 indicated seven qualification pathways of the full-time position responsible for the day-to-day operation of dietetic services. Pathway five indicated the manager is a graduate of a college degree program with major studies in food and nutrition, dietetics, food management, culinary arts, or hotel and restaurant management and is a certified dietary manager (CDM) credentialed by the Certifying Board of the Dietary Managers Association, maintains this certification, and has received at least six hours of in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement a comprehensive antibiotic (ATB) stewardship (program designed to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics and to limit the spread of antibiotic resistance in bacteria) and surveillance program to identify, track, and monitor resident antibiotic use when the facility's ATB stewardship and surveillance program were incomplete for February 2026, March 2026, April 2026, and May 2026. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for an adverse effect (bad reaction or unwanted result) of antibiotics and/or develop an antibiotic-resistant (not effective to treat infection) organisms from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/5/26 at 8:58 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), the facility's Surveillance Log (Log), dated February 2026, March 2026, April 2026, and May 2026 were reviewed. The IP stated she had been working for the facility for 10 years and assumed the position as IP in February 2026. The IP stated she tried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) were completed and documentation was maintained demonstrating delivery of the notices to the resident and/or responsible party (RP) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 90). This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 90 and or RP from being fully informed of Medicare coverage termination, potential financial liability, and appeal rights. Findings:During an interview on 6/4/26 at 8:24 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN), the MDSN stated the process for issuing a NOMC included discussing residents during weekly interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings. The MDSN stated when a resident met their goals and was determined to be safe for discharge home, the IDT identified the last covered day. The MDSN stated she created the NOMC and provided the form to social services for completion. The MDSN further stated social services notified the residents and or RP and initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the required bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 13), when:1. Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on 3/8/26 due to low oxygen levels and was not given the required facility document titled, Bed Hold Notice of Policy & Authorization (BHNPA).2. Resident 13 was transferred to the hospital on 5/25/26 due to shortness of breath (SOB-the feeling that you cannot get enough air into your lungs) and was not given the required facility document BHNPA. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 13 being unaware of their right to return to the facility under state and federal laws and regulations and the option to privately pay to hold their bed if they were a Medicare beneficiary, private pay resident, or insurance resident.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 84) when:1.Resident 2's surgical incision was not coded in the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE].2.Resident 84's use of oxygen was not coded in the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE].These failures had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 84's needs to not be met and changes in status not monitored which could lead to wound and respiratory complications. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/3/26 at 11:40 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 was sitting up in her wheelchair in the dining/activity room with other residents. Resident appeared well groomed holding on to a doll while another resident was trying to engage her to talk. Resident 2 did not respond to questions asked but was mumbling with words. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of five sampled residents (Residents 27 and 84), when:1. Resident 27's physician order for daily dressing changes to the left breast wound were not followed. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection and result in inaccurate medical record documentation. 2. Resident 84's physician order for oxygen was not followed, and there was no documentation and monitoring of oxygen saturation (measures the percentage of oxygen in the blood). This failure placed Resident 84 at risk for receiving too much oxygen or too little oxygen without adequate monitoring which could cause damage to the lungs, brain, and eyes. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 6/2/26 at 9:01 a.m. in Resident 27's room, Resident 27 stated staff had not changed the dressing to her left breast as ordered. Resident 27 stated the dressing was to be changed daily and had not been changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing information was consistently posted in a prominent location that was readily visible and accessible to residents, and visitors, in accordance with regulatory requirements. The facility census was eighty residents. This failure had the potential to prevent residents, visitors and family members from readily accessing required staffing information necessary to make informed decisions regarding resident care and services. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/26 at 12:28p.m. with the Administrator (ADMIN), the surveyor observed the main lobby and other prominent locations within the facility in an attempt to locate the posted daily nurse staffing information. The ADMIN approached surveyor and asked if assistance was needed. When the ADMIN was informed the surveyor was looking for the posted nurse staffing hours, the ADMIN stated the staffing hours were not posted. The ADMIN then reached over the nurses' station counter, retrieved an unlabeled binder, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals (medicines or products made from living organisms) was labeled in accordance with current professional standards of practice and facility procedures for one of four sampled residents (Resident 84), when Resident 84's morphine sulfate (strong opioid pain medication) medication label directions did not match the medication order in the electronic medical administration record (EMAR-digital version of a patient's medication chart).This failure placed Resident 84 at risk of receiving too much or too little pain medication which could lead to more serious health conditions such as not experiencing pain relief or slow or shallow breathing or even unconsciousness. Findings: During a review of Resident 84's admission Record (AR-a document containing resident profile information), dated 6/4/26, the AR indicated Resident 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified intracranial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. One of three dietary staff (Dietary Aid [DA]) did not have facial hair (mustache) properly restrained.2. A [Brand name] (a commercial-grade food processor machine) lid had left over residue of food and was stored on a standing rack that contained dry, clean, and ready-to-use equipment.These failures had the potential to cause cross contamination (the process by which germs are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect) and the growth of microorganisms (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) that harbor foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) of residents' food which could lead to food-borne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) for the 75 residents admitted to the facility who received meals from the kitchen.Findings: 1. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition when pipes on top of two of two washers in the laundry room were observed covered with thick white and green build up. This failure had the potential to affect the efficiency of the washers to clean the personal clothing of 80 residents and linens used in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/4/26 at 8:30 a.m. in the laundry room with Laundry Person (LP) 1, observed two washers with thick white and green hard build up around the pipes connected to the top of the washers. LP 1 stated she did not remember cleaning the top of the washers and was not sure who was responsible to clean the top of the washers. LP 1 stated she only cleaned the lint trap on the bottom of the dryers and wiped down the front lid of the washers. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/4/26 at 8:33 a.m. in the laundry room with the Housekeeping/Laundry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use for an air loss mattress (specialized medical mattress with internal air tubes and tiny holes that continuously circulate air to keep skin dry, cool, and reduce pressure, preventing bedsores (pressure ulcers) by shifting pressure points) and facility staff were trained and competent to use their air loss mattresses safely for one of two sampled residents (Resident (RES)) 2, when RES 2 who had a history of a recent fall (12/9/25) while on an air loss mattress at the facility. RES 2 weighed 124.4 pounds (lbs. -unit of weight measurement) and weight settings on the air loss mattress indicated weight was set at 245 -285 lbs. The nurses assigned to RES 2 did not know what pressure settings should be set on the air loss mattress, and there was no record of any training, education, in-service or competency record for air loss mattress use for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had an elopement (a situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision) assessment done quarterly (every three months) as per their written policy and procedure, and failed to initiate elopement risk interventions for Resident 1 when she was assessed to have a significant increase in her elopement risk factors. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1's elopement from the facility when she was found outside the facility briefly in a confused state early in the winter morning, potentially causing significant risks to Resident 1's health and safety, placing Resident 1 at risk of cold exposure, fear, dehydration and/or other medical complications, or being struck by a motor vehicle. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) , dated 1/27/25, the AR indicated she was admitted to the facility during May 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-14 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey document titled Statement Survey Binder in a place readily accessible for 83 of 83 residents, families, and their legal representatives. This failure had the potential to violate the rights of residents and their representatives to be informed of previous survey deficiencies and the facility's plan of correction. Findings: During an observation on 10/10/24 at 9:31 a.m., a binder titled, State Survey Binder was located in the hallway near the Director of Nursing's (DON) office. During a review of the facility's, State Survey Binder binder, undated, the binder did not contain results for the facilities last recertification survey conducted on 7/14/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/10/24 at 9:07 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the facility's State Survey Binder, undated, was reviewed. The State Survey Binder did not contain the results from the facility's last recertification survey on 7/14/24. The ADM stated the last recertification survey's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to: 1. Comply with Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time dietitian and the requirements were not met as specified in established State standards (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4) for food service managers which required, employment of a full-time, qualified dietetic supervisor when the dietitian was not full-time; and 2. Ensure the Registered Dietitian (RD) provided frequently scheduled consultation to the Food and Nutrition Services department. The lack of a qualified, full-time, competent supervisor to oversee Food and Nutrition Services, and lack of frequently scheduled consultation from the RD, placed the 83 residents who were admitted to the facility at risk for receiving incorrect food items, not receiving a well-balanced diet that was approved by the RD which could result in residents receiving over or under nutrition that can increase their nutrition risk and further compromise their medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed: 1. For the lunch meal on October 8, 2024, when steamed spinach was served instead of creamed spinach for 79 of 81 residents eating spinach at the facility. 2. For the lunch meal on October 8, 2024, when an incorrect scoop size was used for the mechanical (diced) ham given to 24 residents (Resident 34, 185, 1, 16, 33, 51, 42, 22, 24, 43, 46, 26, 60, 2, 29, 186, 27, 40, 21, 30, 76, 184, 18, 35) on the dysphagia advanced (Dys Adv per the National Dysphagia Diet as Level 3-food should be: soft solid, easy-to-cut-meats, fruits and vegetables, requires some chewing ability, meats in soft, bite-size pieces) and the 9 residents (Resident 66, 62, 75, 7, 70, 183, 3, 54, 56) on the dysphagia mechanical (Dys Mech per the National Dysphagia Diet as Level 2-food should be: cohesive, moist semi-solid food, requires some chewing ability, ground or minced meats, moist, ground, soft-textured minced or fork-mashable textured foods) diets; 3. For the lunch meal on October 8, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent infections for three of 21 sampled residents (Residents' 48, 52, and 54) when: 1. Resident 52's oxygen nasal cannula (O2 NC- a tube that directs oxygen into the nose) tubing was observed on top of the oxygen concentrator (medical device that supplies oxygen-enriched air to help people breathe easier) was not stored in a plastic bag. This failure placed Resident 52 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare associated infections. 2. Resident 48's medication syringe was stored in a wet plastic bag and had some orange liquid substance at the tip of the syringe. This failure placed Resident 48 at an increased risk to develop bacterial infection and gastrointestinal illness. 3. Resident 54 who was on Enhanced Standard/Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control measures that help reduce the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician informed consent (the process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of psychoactive medications) for the use of psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions, and behavior) was obtained for three of six sampled residents (Residents' 3, 13 and 64) when: 1. Resident 3 was administered escitalopram oxalate tablet (medication used to treat depression [serious mental illness affecting person's though, feelings, behavior, and sense of well-being] from 6/2/24-6/31/24, 7/1/24-7/31/24 and 81/24-8/27/24 and informed consent was not obtained prior to medication administration. 2. Resident 13 was administered sertraline HCl tablet (medication used to treat depression) from 8/1/24 to 10/14/24 and informed consent was not obtained prior to medication administration. 3. Resident 64 was administered buspirone HCl tablet (medication used to treat anxiety [feeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 75 and Resident 29) when: 1. Resident 75 did not have a care plan (a document that outlines how a resident's health care needs will be met, and is used by the resident and their care team to facilitate communication and collaboration) for the use of indwelling urinary catheter (thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine). This failure placed Resident 75 at risk for her indwelling urinary catheter needs to not be met. 2. Resident 29 did not have a care plan for urinary tract infection (UTI- common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or rectum, enter the urethra and infect the urinary tract). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 29's care needs to go unmet. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/8/24 at 10:13 a.m. in Resident 75's room, Resident 75…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 55) when: 1. License nurses continued to sign the physician's order to monitor for side effects for Resident 29's anticoagulant medication which was discontinued on 9/5/24. This failure resulted in an inaccurate documentation and monitoring of Resident 29's medical symptoms related to the side effects if a medication that has been discontinued. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 prepared and signed Resident 55's medications, and the Infection Preventionist (IP) administered the medication prepared by LVN 1. This failure had the potential for Resident 55 to not received the medication and could lead to medication error and or drug diversion. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 10/10/24 the AR indicated, Resident 29 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide personal hygiene for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 233 and 32) when Resident 233 and 32's fingernails were long and had black particles underneath. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 233 and 32 to develop skin infections or sustain skin injuries. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/8/24 at 8:37 a.m. in Resident 233's room, Resident 233 had long fingernails with black particles underneath. Resident 233 stated, he did not like his fingernails long and wanted them cleaned and cut. Resident 233 stated he did not remember the last time his fingernails were cut. During an interview on 10/8/24 at 8:44 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8 should have cleaned resident's fingernail daily. The DSD stated nurses were responsible cutting diabetic (a chronic disease that occurs when the body doesn't produce or use insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled Residents (Resident 13 and Resident 33) received the necessary care and respiratory services, consistent with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 13's oxygen (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) flow rate (the amount of oxygen being delivered to the body) was not administered according to the physician order (an order given for specific patient/resident by a health care provider). This failure resulted in Resident 13 not obtaining the ordered amount of oxygen via the oxygen concentrator (a machine that pulls in the air around you), which could lead to breathing problems which includes shortness of breath, headache, and confusion. 2. Resident 33's oxygen flow rate was given at a lower rate than the physician's order (a set of written or verbal instructions from a doctor that clinicians follow to care for a patient). This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-14 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven sampled residents (Resident 48 and 133) were assessed for the use of bed (side rails) when Residents 48 and 133 had no assessment for the risk of entrapment, a physician's order specifying reason for use was not obtained and a care plan was not created. Additionally Resident 133 did not have informed consent obtained (a form signed by the resident or family explaining the risks). This failure had the potential to place Resident 48 and 133 at risk for decreased freedom of movement, entrapment and/or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment too used to identify cognitive (mental process) and physical functional level assessment, dated 9/22/2024, indicated Resident 48's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool used to assess resident cognitive level) score was 00 out of 15 indicating Resident 48 has severe cognitive impairment (0-7 indicated severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent (6.9 % [percent]) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN)1 did not administer Resident 48's metformin (brand name-medication used to control high blood sugar) medication during medication pass. This failure had the potential to result in a high blood sugar which could lead to serious medical condition. 2. Resident 23 had a lidocaine patch (transdermal[through the skin] skin patch- topical anesthetic that numbs pain by blocking the nerve signals in your skin) and in place for more than 12 hours. This failure resulted in Resident 23 receiving more than the recommended dose and had the potential for adverse side effects. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/24 at 8:24 a.m. in Station 2, LVN prepared Resident 48's medications and administered six of seven medications scheduled for Resident 48. LVN stated she did not administer metformin to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice for three of 14 sampled residents (Residents 18, 51, and 76) when: 1a. Resident 51's Fluticasone Propionate (medication sprayed into the nostrils in order to reduce swelling in the body) was not labeled with its expiration date. 1b. Resident 76's albuterol sulfate (medication used to help open up the airways making it easier to breathe) was not labeled with its expiration date. These failures placed Residents 51 and 76 at risk of being administered medications way past its expiration date which could result in less effective medications. 2. Resident 18's insulin pen (pen-shaped injector devices that contain a reservoir for insulin or an insulin cartridge) was missing a label on the pen. This failure had the potential to result for Resident 18 at risk of receiving an incorrect medication. 3. Four medication pills were found on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident food preferences were accommodated for three residents (Resident 44, 75, 184); and 2. Provide an alternate option when residents disliked a food group for two residents (Resident 31, 39). This failure had the potential to increase residents' refusal of food items due to the facility not following the resident's preferences and potential reduction of meeting the resident's nutritional needs. 3. Resident 52 's dislike of warm food and preference of cold food on his meal ticket (document used to write a resident ' s diet, likes, dislikes, and allergies) was not documented. This failure had the potential for Resident 52 to not receive the caloric intake needed to meet his nutritional needs. Findings: 1. During the lunch meal observation on 10/08/24 at 12:00 PM, in the kitchen, the steam table contained the following food items: Hawaiian baked ham, steamed spinach, mashed sweet potatoes, poppyseed roll. During a review of the facility document titled, hcsg1NewGen2024 Diet Guide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when the sanitizer solution was not the appropriate concentration to sanitize food preparation areas and equipment. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination and the growth of microorganisms which could lead to food borne illness for the 83 residents admitted to the facility. Findings: During an observation in the kitchen on 10/08/24 at 3:36 PM, Food Service Worker (FSW) 1 wiped down a food service cart with a rag from the red bucket sanitation solution. The red bucket sanitation solution concentration was tested with a dip test strip result zero parts per million (ppm). During a concurrent interview at the same time with FSW 1, FSW 1 stated the concentration of the red bucket sanitation solution should be 200 ppm. The sanitation solution in the red bucket was dumped in the sink, replaced, and re-tested with a dip test strip result of 200 ppm. During an observation in the kitchen on 10/08/24 at 4:41 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of four sampled residents (Resident 39) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 checked Resident 39's blood pressure (B/P-measures the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels [channels that carry blood throughout the body]) and did not provide privacy. 2. LVN 1 administered medication to Resident 39 and did not provide privacy. These failures resulted in Resident 39 not being provided with respect and dignity while his B/P was checked and while taking his medication. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/10/24 at 7:38 a.m. in Station 2 in Resident 39's room, Resident 39 was sitting up in bed watching TV and appropriately dressed. LVN 1 approached Resident 39's bedside and checked Resident 39's blood pressure without closing the privacy curtain or the door, while staff, residents and visitors walked by. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 10:10 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status of one of five sampled residents (Resident 75) when Resident 75's diagnosis of indwelling urinary catheter was not coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 75's care needs to not be met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/8/24 at 10:15 a.m. in Resident 75's room, Resident 75 was laying in bed with eyes open, urinary catheter was observed hanged on the side of the bed with yellow urine. Resident 75 stated she needed the catheter because she was not able to void. Resident 75 stated she prefers to stay in bed. During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 10/11/24, indicated Resident 75 was admitted in the facility on 10/11/24 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of 8 sampled resident (Resident 29) when the care plan was not updated to reflect the insulin (a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels by moving glucose from the bloodstream into cells throughout the body) medication was discontinued on 7/23/24. This failure had the potential for Resident 29's care needs to go unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 10/10/24 the AR indicated, Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type 2 (disease in which your blood glucose, or blood sugar, levels are too high), hypertension (high blood pressure- is when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high (140/90 mmHg or higher) end stage renal disease, (ESRD- is a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured the administration of medication to meet residents needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 48) when Resident 48's metformin (brand name-medication used to control high blood sugar) medication was not available for administration for two days (10/9/24 and 10/10/24). This failure had the potential for Resident 48's blood sugar to increase which could result to serious medical condition. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/10/24 at 8/:24 a.m. in Resident 48's room, Resident 48 was sitting up in bed watching TV, Resident 48 was appropriately dressed and stated he was happy in the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/10/24 at 8:30 a.m. in Station 2 hallway, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed preparing Resident 48's medications. LVN 1 did not administer Resident 48's metformin. LVN 1 stated she did not administer the medication because it was not available. LVN 1 stated licensed nurse are responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure support personnel was able to effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services when [NAME] 1 did not follow menus and recipes. This failure resulted in not accommodating resident preferences which could result in disinterest in meals and decreased meal intake which has a potential to result in weight loss which can compromise the medical condition. This also had the potential to result in increased residents' risk of choking for nine residents. Findings: 1. a. During the review of facility document titled, hcsg1NewGen 2024 Diet Guide Sheet for 10/8/24, showed ½ cup of creamed spinach for the following diets: Regular, Dys Adv, Dys Mech, renal, vegetarian. It showed for the puree diet to serve pureed creamed spinach. During a lunch meal observation on 10/08/24 starting at 12:00 PM, in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 prepared the tray line steam table with: puree (steamed) spinach, regular (steamed) spinach. During an interview with [NAME] 1 on 10/8/24 at 12:48 PM, [NAME] 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was in the proper form when a whole green bean was served on a pureed diet test tray. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of choking for nine residents who had physician ordered pureed diets due to having severe chewing and/or swallowing problems. Findings: During a lunch meal observation in the kitchen on 10/09/24 at 12:26 PM, meals were placed on trays and put into food cart 4. A regular and puree test tray was ordered by the surveyors. [NAME] 1 plated the test tray for the puree diet test tray with pureed ravioli, pureed bread, pureed salad. During an observation on 10/09/24, at 12:48 PM, food cart 4 arrived at nursing station 2 and the test trays were sampled in the hallway, in conjunction with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) 1. A whole green bean was identified in the pureed salad. A concurrent interview was conducted at this time with the CDM 1, he acknowledged the whole green bean in the puree salad and stated that was not okay. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician prescribed diets were followed for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 6) when Resident 6 did not receive his ordered double portion meal for lunch on 10/8/24. This failure placed Resident 6 at risk to not receive the full nutritional value of his meal which had the potential for Resident 6 to experience weight loss Findings: During a review of Residents 6's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 10/10/24, the AR indicated Resident 6's admitting diagnoses included the following: sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), gangrene (a serious condition that occurs when tissue in the body dies due to a lack of blood flow), acquired absence of left below knee (surgical removal of the leg). During an observation on 10/08/24 at 1:03 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 6 was served a regular portion for his lunch. During a review of Resident 6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment in the kitchen for staff. This failure had the potential to increase staff risk of developing heat related illnesses such as heat cramps, heat exhaustion or heatstroke caused by exposure to heat. Findings: During an observation on 10/8/24 at 12:44 PM in the kitchen, the surveyor thermometer read 89.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F) near the hand wash sink. During an observation on 10/8/24 at 3:28 PM in the kitchen, the surveyor thermometer placed on the counter in the center of the kitchen read 90.1 degrees F. During an interview on 10/8/24 at 3:34 PM in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 stated the kitchen is usually this warm. Surveyor thermometer placed on the counter in the center of the kitchen read 90.7 degrees F. During an observation on 10/8/24 at 4:51 PM in the kitchen, the surveyor thermometer placed on the counter in the center of the kitchen read 93.6 degrees F. During an interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) 1 on 10/9/24 at 10:52 AM, CDM 1 stated the air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a care plan for elopement (to run away secretively) risk for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 attempted to leave against medical advice (AMA) from an appointment at the dialysis center on 8/23/23 and was assessed to be a risk for elopement. This failure resulted in Resident 1 successfully leaving AMA from the dialysis center on 9/6/23. FINDINGS: During an interview on 9/13/23 at 8:35 a.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), SSD stated she was aware Resident 1 had eloped from previous Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) but she had never eloped from current SNF. SSD stated she did not know if Resident 1 had a care plan for Elopement. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/13/23 at 8:48 am with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Patient 1's care plans, nurses notes dated 8/23/23, and elopement evaluations dated 8/10/23 and 8/23/24 were reviewed. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 often talked about how she wanted to get out of this place . LVN 1 read the nurses note from 8/23/23 by LVN 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food safety guidelines were followed when: 1. There was no air gap (a fixture that provides back-flow prevention) underneath the food prep sink and the two-compartment sink. 2. Three silver-colored pitchers had grime and build up inside. 3.There were Saltine crackers and graham crackers past the use by date. 4. A package of hot dog buns and a package of sliced bread did not have labels identifying the open dates and use by dates. 5. A container of applesauce did not have the use by date. 6. The freezer temperature reading was 12 °F (degrees fahrenheit [scale of temperature]). These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food) from the growth of microorganisms for the 80 residents eating food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/10/23 at 9:11 a.m. in the kitchen, the two-compartment sink had no air gap with the piping be routed into the wall. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition when the steamer machine in the kitchen was leaking and dripping liquid onto towels placed under the equipment. This failure had the potential to impact the ability of dietary staff to prepare food in a safe and sanitary manner which could affect the residents health. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/10/23, at 9:03 a.m., in the kitchen, the steamer machine was leaking from the front bottom right and left corners onto two white towels which were lined with a brown substance. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated, the towels were placed under the steamer machine to catch the dripping water. During an interview on 7/12/23, at 2:49 p.m., with CDM, CDM stated, the steamer machine in the kitchen was dripping onto towels which caused the towels to be lined with a brown substance. CDM stated, kitchen equipment should have been kept functioning properly to facilitate food preparation for the residents. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician Informed Consent (the process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of psychoactive medications) for the use of psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions, and behavior) was obtained for two of six sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 56) when: 1. Resident 11 was administered lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety [intense excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations]) without current and updated informed consent. 2. Resident 56 was administered escitalopram (brand name) and trazodone (medications used to treat depression [mood disorder characterized by feelings of sadness and loss of interest]) on 6/27/23 to 7/11/23 and informed consent was not obtained prior to medication administration. These failures resulted in Resident 11 and Resident 56 to be administered with psychotropic medications and not fully…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 3 of 12 residents (Residents 2, 26 and 66) when: 1. Resident 66's care plan reflected active interventions for treatment to his right foot even after having a right below the knee amputation (surgical removal of limb). This failure placed Resident 66 at a potential risk of his right lower leg care needs not to be met. 2. Resident 12 no longer used a communication board (paper with words and pictures) to communicate with staff. This failure placed Resident 12 at a potential risk of not being able to communicate her needs due to not having a tool to help communicate. 3. Resident 26's care plan reflected ongoing physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy (therapies to help improve one's mobility, activities of daily living and speaking services). This failure placed Resident 26 at a potential risk for his current care needs not to be met. Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 22, 28, 47 and 22 ) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 failed to follow the manufacturers direction to shake tube feeding formula prior to hanging and administering to Resident 22. This failure placed Resident 22 at a potential risk to not receiving the amount of nutrition ordered by the physician. 2. LVN 6 signed the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR- legal record of drug administration to a patient at a facility by a health care professional) prior to administering Resident 22's medications. This failure resulted in inaccurate charting and placed Resident 22 at a risk to not receive the medication ordered. 3. LVN 11 did not follow medication administration direction when she gave medication to Resident 47 without giving food. This failure had the potential to put Resident 47 at risk for stomach upset. 4. A small medication cup filled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when: 1. One Fluticasone Prop 50mcg (microgram -a unit of measure) spray (medication used to treat allergy) was opened with no label of used-by date or open date and another bottle of Fluticasone was expired. This failure had the potential to decrease the medication potency that could compromise the therapeutic effectiveness when used by Resident 138 and Resident 69. 2. Resident 81's Ipratropium/Albuterol (medication used to prevent and treat difficulty breathing, wheezing, shortness of breath) medication was expired. This failure had the potential to decrease the medication potency that could compromise the therapeutic effectiveness when used by Resident 81. 3. Resident 22's Insulin Lispro (medication used to treat diabetes[high blood sugar]) was opened with no indication of used-by date or when the insulin was opened. This failure had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to contain garbage and refuse (nonhazardous solid waste) properly for three out of four dumpsters when the dumpster lids were not have securely closed lids. This failure had the potential to attract rodents, insects and flies and spread infection which placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/10/23 at 1:58 p.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), in the back parking lot of the facility, there were four dumpsters. One dumpster had a lid which was fully open. A second dumpster had a lid that was propped open due to trash piled up underneath the lid. A third dumpster had two lids that were ill-fitting which created a gap between the lids. CDM stated, the lids to the three dumpsters were not closed securely. CDM stated staff were to keep the lids completely closed after opening. CDM stated, bugs and rodents could have entered the dumpsters with the lids open. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/13/23 at 9:00 a.m. with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for eight of 38 residents (Residents 22, 26, 29, 32, 55, 59, 66 and 73) when: Residents 22, 26, 29, 32, 55, 59, 66 and 73's Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a document indicating wishes for end-of-life care) were incomplete in the residents medical record. This failure had the potential risk for Residents' 22, 26, 29, 32, 55, 56, 59, 66 and 73's end-of-life care decisions to not be followed in case of an emergency. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encounter for palliative care (specialized care for people with a serious illness), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of diseases which causes blocked airflow and difficulty breathing), hemiplegia (paralysis on one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent infections for three of 12 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 22, and 33) when: 1. Resident 4's room entry did not have signage indicating he was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities, designed to reduce transmission MDROs [organisms resistant to multiple antibiotics]) or indicate what precautions and personal protective equipment (PPE-items worn to protect healthcare worker from body fluids and infectious diseases) were required. This failure had the potential to infect staff, residents and other visitors with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA- a bacteria which is difficult to treat due to resistance to antibiotics) and spread it to others. 2. Resident 22's gastrostomy tube (G-tube -tube inserted through the abdominal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of personal information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Registered Nurse (RN) left her workstation computer open and unattended with resident information exposed to public view. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 2's rights to confidentiality and the potential for unauthorized access to Resident 2's personal information. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/11/23, at 7:05 am., in station 1 hallway, a medication cart was parked outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], the computer on the medication cart was left open and unattended by RN. The computer screen displayed Residents 2's name, photo, room number, allergies and a list of prescribed medications visible to everyone who passed by the medication cart out in the hallway. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR- document which contain patient personal information), dated 7/13/23, the AR indicated Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS -assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of six sampled residents (Resident 11) when Resident 11's antipsychotic medication (used to treat severe mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to recognize reality or relate to others) use was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 11's care needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 7/12/23, indicated Resident was admitted in the facility on 12/22/22 with diagnoses which included unspecified psychosis (mental health problem that causes people to perceive or interpret things differently from those around them) and anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During a review of Resident 11's, Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 56) when Resident 56 was on continuous oxygen (a life supporting component of air) therapy for her respiratory illness. This failure placed Resident 56 at a potential risk for her oxygen care needs not met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/10/23, at 8:35 a.m., with Resident 56's room, Resident 56 was sitting up in bed watching television. Resident 56 was on oxygen via nasal cannula (small flexible tube to deliver supplemental oxygen) connected to an oxygen concentrator (medical device that produces oxygen) at bedside. Resident 56 stated the oxygen helped her breathing. During a review of Resident 56's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 7/12/23, the AR indicated, Resident 59 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis (body's extreme response to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper maintenance and care for residents with foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter - a thin tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a bag) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 65) when Resident 65's urinary catheter bag was touching the floor on three separate occasions. This failure resulted in compromised urine drainage and accumulation of a large amount of sediment in the urinary catheter tubing and placed Resident 65 at a potential risk for catheter contamination, urinary retention (unable to empty the bladder) and a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system [kidneys, ureters, bladder]). Findings: During an observation on 7/12/23, at 3:30 p.m., Resident 65 was lying in bed resting. Resident 65's bed was in the lowest position and the foley catheter bag hanging on the bed frame, folded in half and touching the floor. Resident 65's catheter tubing was filled with cloudy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured the administration of medications to meet residents needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 35) when Resident 35's Benazepril (brand name [medication used to treat high blood pressure]) was not available for administration for 8 days (7/4/23, 7/5/23, 7/6/23, 7/7/23, 7/8/23, 7/9/23, 7/10/23 and 7/11/23). This failure had the potential for Resident 35's blood pressure to be uncontrolled and lead to serious medical condition. Findings: During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on 7/11/23 at 7:15 a.m., at Station 1, RN was preparing Resident 35's medications after checking blood pressure which was 168/93. RN did not administer Resident 35's benazepril medication. RN stated the medication was not available to give to Resident 35. RN stated Resident 35's B/P was at 168/93 and could go higher. RN stated having high blood pressure could result to a more serious health condition because the medication was not administered. RN stated follow-up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent (eight percent) when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) did not administer Resident 35's benazepril (brand name [medication used to treat high blood pressure]) medication during medication pass. This failure had the potential for Resident 35's blood pressure to go higher and lead to serious medical condition. 2. RN administered diltiazem (medication used to treat high blood pressure) medication to Resident 68 with blood pressure of 157/71 and pulse rate of 51. This failure resulted in Resident 68 receiving her blood pressure medication not as prescribed by the physician and had the potential for Resident 68's blood pressure and pulse to go lower and lead to serious medical condition. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/11/23 at 7:15 a.m., in Station 1, RN was passing medication. RN checked Resident 35's blood pressure which was noted as 168/93. RN prepared Resident 35's medications and administered two of three medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for one of 81 residents (Resident 83) when incorrect portion sizes of the spinach au gratin and baked sweet potatoes was served to Resident 83 during lunch on 7/11/23. This failure had the potential for Resident 83 to receive the wrong caloric intake and not meet his nutritional needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/11/23, at 12:55 p.m., in the kitchen, Assistant Supervisor (AS) served a gray scoop (4 oz.[ounce - unit of measure]/ 1/2 cup) of spinach au gratin, a gray scoop of baked sweet potatoes to a large portion meal. AS stated, the large portion tray received same sized gray scoops of the spinach au gratin and baked sweet potatoes as a regular tray. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/12/23, at 2:55 p.m., the Tuesday (Day 24) Lunch Diet Guide Sheet, dated 5/8/23, was reviewed. The Diet Guide Sheet indicated, the large meal was to receive 2/3 cup of Spinach Au Gratin and 2/3 cup of Baked Sweet Potatoes. The Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed ensure their policy and procedure was followed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 29) when there was no documentation of Resident 29's education of the risk and benefits and his refusal of the Influenza vaccine (a preparation used to stimulate body's immune response against infection by flu viruses). This failure had the potential for Resident 29 of not being informed on the risks and benefits of receiving the influenza vaccine and not being able to make an informed decision. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and Resident 29 was [AGE] years old. During concurrent interview and record review on 7/14/23 at 2:37 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 29's medical record for Influenza Immunization Informed consent forms was reviewed. The IP stated Resident 29 refused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BQ OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2021 |
| BOLD QUAIL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2020 |
| NEWGEN LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| ROBIN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| TRESS, AVROHOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2020 |
| HAKIMIPOUR, MEHDI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| SHAW, PAMELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| WILLIAMS, NATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/03/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $548K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055573. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.