No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brightwood Center

840 Lee Road, Follansbee, WV 26037 · For profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (304) 527-1100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations$65,274 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent May 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $65,274 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 32% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
138 Rockdale Rd · (304) 527-1747 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
866 Main St · (304) 527-0150 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Riesbecks1.5 mi
1512 Main St · (304) 527-3835 · Call to confirm hours
Park
648 Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.1%14.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.0%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%4.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened36.2%15.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.9%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.5%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.1%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.411.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.521.841.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
17.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 17.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.4%CMS range 27.4–49.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.3–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge17.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge21.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.5–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.76
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
60.4%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 107.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-27)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual and psychosocial abuse perpetrated by another resident . This created an immediate jeopardy situation and put all residents at risk. Resident identifier's: #97 and #102. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #97 At approximately 09:05 AM on 05/20/2025, Resident #97 reported to a surveyor she was abused by Resident #58. Resident #97 stated Resident #58 hit her with her wheelchair and put her hand up my crotch. The resident stated she reported the alleged abuse to Nurse Aide (NA) #63 who, instead of reporting it, made fun of her and laughed while stating, Didn't you like it? The resident stated she told NA #63 she did not like it. NA #63 did not report the allegation of abuse and Resident #97 stated she asked repeatedly to fill out a complaint and the facility would not listen to her. Resident #97 stated a friend, who used to be a Director of Nursing (DON), came to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by failing to take actions related to allegations of abuse/neglect, when reported by staff. This had the potential to adversely affect all residents residing in the facility. The State Agency (SA) determined these failures caused Resident #97 to suffer sexual abuse and psychosocial harm. Due to the facility's failure to act on the allegation of sexual abuse when they were made aware not only placed Resident #97 at risk for sexual abuse and psychosocial harm but also placed the remaining 110 residents. The SA determined this constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. Facility census: 111. Resident identifiers: #97, #58, and #102. Findings include: a) Resident #97 The State Agency (SA) identified two (2) Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse by not implementing written policies for abuse and following policy and procedures to investigate abuse allegations. This was true for one(1) of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy situation due to all residents residing in the facility could experience serious actual or psychological harm if the facility did not immediately intervene. Resident identifier: #97. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident#97 Observation during the survey revealed a flyer citing the Elder Justice Act of 2010 posted in the facility's break-room. The flyer stated, If you have reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred against a resident or patient, the federal Elder Justice Act of 2010 and Genesis Integrity Program require that you report your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview the facility failed to provide the right to a safe, comfortable and homelike environment by not providing residents access to over the bed lights. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Facility Census: 111 Findings Include: a) On 5/19/25 at 12:45 PM a resident voiced her concern that she could not see very well while reading in her bed. She believed the light bulb needed to be brighter. Upon further investigation it was found that there was a light fixture over each resident's bed. There was a toggle switch to the right of each fixture. It is placed in a manner that requires the resident to get out of bed, walk to the head of the bed and reach the toggle switch in order to operate the light. On 5/19/25 at 3:30 PM during an interview and walk through of the facility, the Administrator confirmed that there are residents that can not access the switch. She stated she had never even noticed that the lights did not have pull strings or a way residents could access the light other than calling out for staff to assist them. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing information was accurate, by failing to update the posting. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) During staffing review, daily nurse staff postings were reviewed. During that review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately update the posted information. The following days were reviewed and compared with the facility's punch in and out reports, with discrepancies: -11/16/2024- No census was indicated on the staffing sheet. Total direct care hours are 309.38 on the staffing sheet. On the facility punch in and out reports, the accurate number was 299.60. 11/23/2024- No census was indicated on the staffing sheet. Total direct care hours are 279 on the staffing sheet. On the facility punch in and out reports, the accurate number was 272.98. 12/28/24- Hours Per Patient Day (HPPD) indicated on the staff posting was 2.8 hours. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and observations the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to a dignified existence. This is in relation to their dining experience and failing to invite the residents and/or resident's representative to participate in the care plan meeting. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #59, #89, #80, #6, #13, #109, #3, #14, #42 #58, #59, #109, and #42. Facility Census: 111 Findings Include: a) Resident #59 On 5/19/25 at 5:15 PM during the dinner meal observation in the Coral Dining Room it was observed that five (5) residents at table #1 were not served their meals at the same time. There were three (3) additional large tables seating five (5) at one table, and three (3) at the other two. There were also two (2) residents sitting at individual tables, alone. Resident #59 received her meal at 5:18 PM and began eating. Staff members continued serving meals to the other tables in the dining room prior to finishing serving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide suitable snacks for residents consistent with the residents plan of care. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier's: # 74, #87, #10, and # 90. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Snacks, Nourishments, Supplements and Pantry Stock stated, Snacks, nourishments, supplements and pantry stock are available to complement meal service and are stored in a clean and sanitary environment. The policy and procedure stated the definition of a Snack was Evening snack is planned as part of the menu. and the definition of Pantry Stock was Small amounts of foods stored at the nursing station to accommodate resident requests between meals when the Food and Nutrition Services department is closed, as well as provide products for medication pass. On 05/20/25 at 2:00 PM, a Resident Council Meeting was held. The Resident Council Members reported the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage: Dry Goods stated, 5. All packaged and canned food items will be kept clean, dry, and properly sealed. 6. Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate. The Regional Chef #162 reported, the facility policy is for items to be dated seven (7) days after being opened with an open and close date. The facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage: Cold Foods stated, 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and date, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The Regional Chef # 162 reported, the facility policy is for items to be dated seven (7) days after being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to adhere to proper infection control practices by leaving food items being transported from the kitchen to the floor, uncovered and by failing to handle and transport soiled linens in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) During dinner service on 05/19/25 at approximately 5:35 PM, each tray being pulled from the delivery cart was observed as having an uncovered brownie on it. When asked if the brownies should be uncovered, The Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (CRC) stated, I ' m not sure, I will let you know. The CRC returned and stated, They can be uncovered because we are taking them from the cart to the rooms. At approximately 11:05 AM, on 5/20/2025, the policy regarding meal distribution was reviewed, and it was confirmed with the Regional Chef, that all items transported from the kitchen should be covered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on investigation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. Furthermore, facility staff failed to notify maintenance or management of defective equipment promptly, thereby potentially exposing all residents in the facility to injury. Resident identifier: #24. Facility Census: 111. Findings include: a) Resident #24 Record review on 05/20/25 at approximately 2:30 PM revealed Resident #24 was injured on 04/10/25, when the resident's bed moved while the nursing assistant was providing care. Resident #24 struck his head against the nightstand on the left side of the bed. The resident sustained two lacerations to the top of his head. The facility investigation revealed that the wheel on the resident's bed was broken. The bed moved even when the wheel was locked. Maintenance replaced the wheels and then performed a whole house audit of all the beds in the facility. Further review of the records revealed that the incident was reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to afford the residents and their representatives the opportunity to participate in the care planning process and to be included in decisions and changes in care, treatment, and/or interventions. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents interviewed. Resident Identifiers: Residents #42 and #70. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include: a) Resident #42 During an interview on 05/19/25, at 1:00 PM, the resident stated that he had not been invited to, nor given the opportunity to participate in, his care plan meeting. He further mentioned that his sister, who was his Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA), was not allowed to attend the meeting. Additionally, the resident's MPOA submitted a written statement that included the following: In our first conversation, Director of Social Services (DSS) #66 told me that a care meeting was being planned for Friday, 3/28/25 at 4:30 p.m. to discuss [Resident's] progress and sending him to LTC. She stated she would be on vacation, returning Monday, March 24. In discussing care at home for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident of treatment and healthcare information in accordance with his preferences. The facility further failed to ensure that each resident had the opportunity to exercise their autonomy regarding those things that were important in their life. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents surveyed for choices. Resident Identifier: #70. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include: a) Resident #70 During an interview on 05/19/25, at 1:08 PM, Resident #70 expressed feeling unsafe because the facility does not keep him informed about his lab test results and other treatment outcomes. The resident, who is [AGE] years old and a veteran, also mentioned that he had not been invited to participate in his care plan meetings. He stated that he receives documentation and lab results from the VA hospital but that his requests for documentation from the Long Term Care facility have been ignored. A review of Resident #70's Care Plan on 05/21/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to give appropriate notices for discharges for residents who received Medicare Part A services. This was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident Identifier: #102. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #102 A discharge for Resident #102 was initiated by the facility from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. A Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) and a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) were not acknowledged by the beneficiary or the beneficiary's representative. Findings were confirmed by Senior Nursing Home Administrator #160 on 05/27/25 at 10:04 AM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform a thorough investigation and failed to take the necessary steps to correct the alleged violation. Resident identifier: #265. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include: a) Resident #265 A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted on 10/21/24 at 3:15 Pm stated that Resident #265 had alleged that that she had to wait for three hours on 10/20/24 for incontinence care. The facility had performed an investigation and found the allegation unsubstantiated. Resident #265 was no longer at the facility. Record review on 05/22/25 at 10:00 AM revealed that Resident #265 had capacity and was classified as Dependent. Further review of records revealed a statement on 10/28/24 by Resident #74, the roommate of Resident #265, who stated that she had witnessed Resident #265 experience extended wait times for assistance on multiple occasions. Resident #74 also corroborated Resident #265's account of the night of 10/20/24. Record review also revealed that Resident #74 had capacity. Another statement by Physical Therapist #130 on 10/21/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the care plan for Resident #110 by failing to implement non-pharmacological interventions for pain and by failing to identify an acceptable level of pain. This was true for one (1) of 30 care plans reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifier: #110. Facility census: 111. a) Resident #110 During a review of Resident #110's care plan on 5/19/2025, the following was noted: Focus- (Resident #110's name) is at risk for decreased ability to perform ADLs in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting. Date initiated-05/02/25. Goal- (Resident #110's name) will improve current level of function in:bathing, grooming/personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting by next review as evidenced by improved ADL scores. Date initiated- 05/02/25. Interventions- Monitor for pain. Attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain and document effectiveness. Administer pain medication as ordered and document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for a resident with ordered adaptive equipment. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #100. Facility Census: 111. Findings Included: a) On 05/19/25 at 05:44 PM, Resident #100 was given his drink during the dinner meal in a Sip-A-Mug cup. Resident #100's care plan stated to provide a [NAME] Cup. On 05/21/2025 at 03:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated they changed the order yesterday for a Sip-A-Mug due to the straw used with a [NAME] Cup. The resident is currently ordered honey consistency thickened liquids. The DON confirmed the resident's care plan stated to provide a [NAME] Cup. b) The facility's policy and procedure for Assistive Devices stated, Assistive devices/utensils will be provided as identified in the individualized plan of care to maintain or improve a resident's/patient's ability to eat or drink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), by failing to ensure Resident #110 was assisted to bed and Resident #42 received assistance with toileting and incontinence care. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for ADL care during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #110, #42. Facility census: 111. Findings include: A) Resident #110 At approximately 2:50 PM on 5/19/25, Resident #110 was observed in his geri chair, facing the wall, between his and his roommate's beds. Resident #110 was attempting to sleep, curled up with his head resting on his left arm, on the left arm rest of his chair. At approximately 3:25 PM, multiple staff members had been witnessed walking by, and looking into, the resident's room, noticing him in the chair. At one point, staff walked in and pulled his roommate's curtain because he was asleep. At approximately 3:30 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the environment over which it had control was free from accident hazards. Namely, the facility failed to identify risks and hazards related to the resident's beds and failed to perform preventive maintenance to ensure that the beds were safe and functional. In addition, the facility's preventive maintenance program failed to identify the risks posed by defective or broken bed wheels and failed to include inspection, assessment, and maintenance of the bed wheels in the facility's preventive maintenance policy. Resident Identifier: Resident #24. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include: a) Resident #24 A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 04/10/25 stated that Resident #24 was injured when the resident's bed moved while the nursing assistant was providing care. Resident struck his head against the stand on the left side of the bed. The resident sustained two lacerations to the top of his head. The resident was assessed, and neuro checks were implemented. Neuro checks were found to be within normal limits.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to control pain for Resident #110 by failing to implement non-pharmacological interventions for pain and by failing to identify an acceptable level of pain. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for pain during the survey process. Resident identifier: #110. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) Resident #110 At approximately 3:30 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #110 while he was in his chair, beside his bed. The resident stated he was in pain at the time, and would rate his pain at an eight (8) on a scale of one (1) to 10. The resident stated he would much rather be in his bed than the chair and stated he had asked staff to put him in his chair already, but was told they would be back to assist him. The resident stated he was in constant pain and did not feel like it was controlled. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident suffered frequent pain and it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Medically related social services were provided to Resident #51, related to a desired transfer to another facility. This is true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for medically related social services during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #51. Facility census: 111. Findings include a) Resident #51 At approximately 2:40 PM on 05/19/25, an interview was conducted with Resident #51. During the interview, Resident #51 stated he would like to transfer to a facility in Maryland, but had trouble getting assistance from the facility. He states he reached out to his sister and she was looking but she doesn't know what to look for. Resident #51 states he told the social worker at the facility but she hasn't got back to me about it. During review of the resident's electronic health record, it was noted the facility has one note from September 2023 where they inquired with one facility about a transfer to Maryland. The note stated they were awaiting a response. No response or follow up notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview the facility failed to honor resident preferences for meals or provide an alternative vegetable. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #75 and #80. Facility Census: #111 Findings include: a) Resident #75 On 05/19/25 at 5:34 PM an observation was made of Nurse Aide (NA) #110 assisting Resident #75 with her meal. Resident #75 was heard to say, Do not give me any of these peas. Nurse Aide #110 replied, I know, I won't give you any. Resident #75 replied and don't get them mixed in my other food. When this surveyor ask Resident #75 don't you like peas? She stated, No and they know it. Observation of Resident #75's meal ticket did not have peas listed as being served. It listed the following: 4 Tbsp creamed peanut butter & jelly #10 scoop Ground meat butter crumb topped fish fillet with 1 Tbsp lemon mayonnaise 1/2 cup Au Gratin Potatoes 1 each ice cream variety 1 each frosted brownie 8 ox 2% milk 1 each dinner roll 1 each margarine It was confirmed with Nurse Aide#110 at that time that Resident #75 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide adaptive devices during a meal. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #89 and #100. Facility Census: #111 Findings Include: a) Resident #89 On 5/19/25 at 5:25 PM observation at the dinner meal found Resident #89 had a meal ticket that consisted of a sip a mug. She did not have a sip a mug provided with her meal. This was confirmed on 5/19/25 at 5:30 PM with Nurse Aide (NA) #110 at which time she commented I don't know if she still has an order for the sip mug. Review of her physicians orders reads: Regular/Liberalized diet Regular texture, standard thin liquids consistency, sip a mug per residents request. Her care plan read: Resident at increased nutritional risk d/t ETOH abuse, COPD, cerebral aneurysm may affect nutritional status/meal intake. Advanced age. significant weight loss from 2/7/25 - 3/7/25, decreased meal intake, She is forgetting to eat and needs cued. Patient will consume adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a smoking assessment for Resident #32. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for smoking. Resident identifier: #32. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) Resident #32 During a review of Resident #32's electronic health record on 05/21/25, it was noted a smoking assessment was completed for the resident on 04/29/25. The last question of the smoking assessment had three (3) choices to choose from. Those choices were the resident was allowed to smoke independently, with assistance, or not at all. This question was left blank, with no determination made regarding the resident's smoking status. The incomplete assessment was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing (DON) at approximately 3:00 PM on 05/21/25.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to deploy sufficient staff to meet resident care needs by failing to provide Activities of daily living (ADL) care for Residents #28, 24, and 81, while failing to meet state minimum staffing numbers on reviewed days. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: 28, 24, 81. Facility census: 109 Findings include: A) Resident #28 At approximately 12:55 PM on 04/23/24, an interview was conducted with Resident #28. Resident #28 stated he had requested to be shaved twice a week. Resident #28 stated he gets a shower one day a week and is supposed to be shaved during the shower,plus an additional day a week, however, Resident #28 states Sometimes they'll say they don't have time to shave me. Resident #28 had not been shaved at this time and stated they had not been shaved in at least a week. At approximately 11:20 AM on 04/24/24, an interview was conducted with Nurse Aide (NA) #103 concerning shaving Resident #28. NA #103 stated, We try to shave everyone in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide dignified dining experiences for residents eating in the dining room and their rooms. The facility failed to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time. The facility also failed to sit down while feeding Resident #100 and #108. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: 100, 108. Facility census: 109. Findings include: a) Coral Dining Room At approximately 5:20 PM on 04/22/24, facility staff were observed in the Coral Dining Room serving dinner. During the dinner service, staff were observed serving residents at different tables instead of one table at a time, leaving residents to wait as long as ten (10) minutes for their tray, after the first resident was served at their table. The Director of Nursing (DON) was present in the dining room at the time of service and acknowledged witnessing the staff serving different tables. b) 300 Hall At approximately 5:46 PM on 04/22/24, dinner service was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide information and/or offer the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) immunization per recommendation of the CDC in a timely manner, complete neurological checks or accurately provide pain management. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who currently reside in the facility. Resident Identifier: #27 and #80. Facility census: 109. Findings include: a) RSV immunization During a review of the facility documents regarding immunizations, found zero (0) out of 109 residents have been provided educational information about the risk and benefits of receiving the RSV vaccination. On 04/25/24 at 11:09 AM, Infection Preventionist (IP) stated the facility has not started giving the information or offering the vaccine to anyone yet. b) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, is a common respiratory virus that usually causes mild, cold-like symptoms. Most people recover in a week or two, but RSV can be serious. Infants and older…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to complete temperature logs for food items being maintained on the steam table at meal service. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 109. Findings include: At approximately 1:25 PM on 04/22/24, during the initial tour of the kitchen, service line temperature logs were reviewed for the month of April. During this review, it was noted the service line temperature log for 04/15/24 was not completed for any meals that day, while the service line temperature log was not completed for dinner service on 04/16/24. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the temperature logs were incomplete for the preceding dates and stated We ' re not perfect, we are going to miss some things.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, resident council meeting, and anonymous staff interviews, the facility failed to offer residents a nourishing evening/bedtime snack. This failed practice had the potential to affect an unlimited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #80, #48, #28, #13, #40, #72, #66, #48, #63, #50, #105, #78, #53, #55, #68, #19, and #11. Facility census: 109. a) Evening/Bedtime Snack During an interview on 04/22/24 at 3:34 PM, Resident #80 reported she was not offered an evening snack. A subsequent review of Resident #80's Significant Change in Status minimum data set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/29/24, indicated resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15. This score signified the resident was cognitively intact. During a resident council meeting, on 04/23/24 at 10:40 AM, the 18 residents in attendance reported they were not offered evening/bedtime snacks but would like them if they were offered. One (1) resident stated she knew some residents had a physician order to receive a snack in the evening and those snacks were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner, and maintain sanitary equipment. This has the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 109 Findings include: A) Salad At approximately 1:00 PM on 04/22/24, a tour was conducted of the kitchen in the facility. During the tour, three salads, in plastic bowls with lids, were found in the reach in refrigerator without dates on them. The Dietary Manager (DM) acknowledged and confirmed the salads had been prepared the previous week and had no date on them. B) Sauerkraut At approximately 1:02 PM on 04/22/24, during the tour of the facility's kitchen, a plastic container of sauerkraut was found in the walk in refrigerator without a date on it. The DM acknowledged and confirmed the sauerkraut had been prepared the previous week and had no date on it. C) Apple Sauce At approximately 1:12 PM on 04/22/24 during a tour of the nourishment rooms, a jar of opened apple sauce was found in the Nourishment Room A refrigerator with the date of 04/01/24 with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices by failing to ensure soiled specimen collection devices were not left in rooms, resident trays were not placed in nourishment room refrigerators, dirty linens were not left in the floor, linen carts were not uncovered, and that items that could contaminate clean linen were not placed on linen carts. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 109. Findings include: A) Nourishment Room A At approximately 1:12 PM on 04/22/24, during a tour of the nourishment room A, a resident's lunch tray from their room was found to be placed in the nourishment room refrigerator. The Dietary Manager (DM) was present during the tour and stated I don't know why that's in there. They know they are not supposed to put those in there because it causes an issue. B) room [ROOM NUMBER] At approximately 2:15 PM on 04/22/24, during a tour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident, and staff interview the facility failed to honor a Resident choice for bathing. This affected one of one reviewed for choices, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifiers #66. Census 109. Findings include: a) Resident #66 During an interview with Resident #66 on 04/23/23 at 12:21 PM, he stated he only receives one (1) shower a week. He stated, he would like to have at least two showers a week. Medical record review revealed, Resident #66's shower schedule is Monday and Thursdays and AS needed per Residents choice. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) from 03/07/24, found the resident's brief interview for mental status was fifteen (15). MDS Section E (Behaviors) also indicated Resident #66 does not reject care such as ADL Care, medications, or treatments. A continued review of Resident #66's ADL documentation found from 03/26/24 to 04/24/24: he only received five showers. On 04/24/24 at 4:45 PM the Director of Nursing verified Resident #66 did not receive his showers as scheduled.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form to two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice during an annual survey. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident Identifiers: #48 and #216. Facility census: 109 Findings include a) Beneficiary Notice Review On 04/24/24 at 3:18 PM, a review was completed regarding the beneficiary protection notification liability notices given for the following two (2) residents who remained at the facility following their last covered day of Medicare Part A services: - Resident #24 began Medicare Part A skilled services on 01/17/24. The last covered day of Part A service was 02/17/24. Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was signed and dated on 02/15/24. There was no evidence a SNF ABN form had been provided and signed. - Resident #216 began Medicare Part A skilled service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to safeguard the privacy of Resident #88's medical record. This was true for one (1) of 12 residents reviewed during medication administration. Resident #88. Facility Census: 109. Findings Include: a) Resident #88 On 04/24/24 at 1:46 PM, an observation was made during medication administration on the B hall. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38 was standing at the medication cart. LPN #38 was preparing to administer medication to Resident #88. At this time, Resident #12 requested LPN #38 assist her to the bathroom. Upon walking away from the medication cart, LPN #38 left the computer screen visible to anyone within the vicinity of the medication cart. On 04/24/24 at 1:51 PM, LPN #38 returned to the medication cart. LPN #38 was advised the computer screen was visible while Resident #12 was being assisted. LPN #38 stated, I'm sorry I forgot to lock my computer screen. On 04/24/24 at approximately 5:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the incident during medication administration. The DON stated, thank you for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #108. This was true for two (2) of 24 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #108. Facility Census: 109. Findings Include: a) Resident #108 On 04/23/24 at 10:00 AM, the admission MDS dated [DATE] was reviewed. The review found Section O entitled Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs was incorrect regarding J1. Dialysis. Section J1 did not indicate the resident was receiving dialysis treatments. On 04/23/24 at 10:19 AM, Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (CRC) #65 was notified. CRC #65 confirmed section J1 was incorrect. CRC #65 stated, we can send in a correction right away.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect a change in activities of daily living (ADL) status for resident #80 and a change in Resident #108's need for assistance during meals. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #80 and #108. Facility census: 109. Findings include: a) Resident #80 A medical record review was completed on 04/24/24 at 2:33 PM. Review of Resident #80's care plan revealed a discrepancy in the amount of assistance resident required for the following ADLs: -Toileting -Bed Mobility -Transfers The FOCUS section of resident's care plan stated resident required assistance/was dependent for the ADLS mentioned above. However, the INTERVENTIONS section of resident's care plan stated resident was independent in all three (3) areas. During an interview on 04/25/24 at 9:36 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported Resident #80 was independent in the areas of toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. The DON acknowledged the FOCUS section had not been updated to reflect the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL)s the necessary services to maintain good grooming for Resident #28, by not shaving the resident twice a week, as requested by the resident, and by not providing nail care and assisting Resident #24 with meals. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident identifiers: 28, 24. Census 109. Findings include: A) Resident #28 At approximately 12:55 PM on 04/23/24 an interview was conducted with Resident #28. Resident #28 stated he had requested to be shaved twice a week. Resident #28 stated he gets a shower one day a week and is supposed to be shaved during the shower,plus an additional day a week, however, Resident #28 states Sometimes they'll say they don't have time to shave me. Resident #28 had not been shaved at this time and stated they had not been shaved in at least a week. At approximately 11:20 AM on 04/24/24, an interview was conducted with Nurse Aide (NA) #103 concerning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and accident free environment as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #58. Facility Census: 109. Findings Include: a) Resident #58 On 04/23/24 at 9:50 PM, a bottle of lubricating eye drops were found at Resident #58's bedside. The resident stated, I don't know how long they have been sitting there. On 04/23/24 at 9:52 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #92 was notified the eye drops were found at bedside. LPN #92 confirmed the eye drops should not have been left at bedside. On 04/24/24 at 9:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the incident regarding the eye drops found at bedside. The DON stated, medication should not be left at bedside.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to manage Resident #5's chronic pain. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of pain. Resident Identifier: #5. Facility Census: 109. Findings Include: a) Resident #5 On 04/22/24 at 2:15 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #5. The resident stated, I have had four (4) back surgeries .they won't give me pain medication .they say they are referring me to a pain clinic. On 04/22/24 at 5:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #5. The review found two (2) current physician's orders for the following: -- Tylenol Extra Strength 500mg (milligram) give two (2) tablets by mouth every 6 (six) hours as needed for general discomfort 1-4 (one to four) pain scale. Do not exceed 3 (three) gram within 24 hours. Code for non-pharm (pharmacological) intervention 0 (zero) nonpain 1 Reposition 2 massage 3 apply cold 4 apply heat 5 (five) Ambulate/movement 6 (six) limit movement 7 (seven) promote relaxation/calm environment 14 other-add to PN the description (Typed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    , Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of care for residents receiving dialysis. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of dialysis. Resident Identifier: #108. Facility Census: 109. Findings Include: a) Resident #108 On 04/22/24 at 6:40 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #108. The review found the resident receives dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Fridays. The resident's chair time is 10:30 AM. A review of the Dialysis Communication forms was completed on 04/24/24 at 9:30 AM. The following Dialysis Communication form was found to be incomplete: --04/06/24 pre-dialysis facility nurse's signature was missing On 04/24/24 at 10:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. The DON confirmed the Dialysis Communication forms should be filled out completely.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications for Resident #91 were not misappropriated by failing to properly reconcile the narcotic medication count. This was true for one (1) of one (1) for pharmacy records during the survey process. Resident identifier: 91. Facility census: 91. Findings include: A) Incident At approximately 6:00 AM on 04/06/24, Registered Nurse (RN) #5 noticed a bottle of liquid morphine was empty, indicating a discrepancy in the narcotic medication count. RN #5 signed the narcotic medication count sheet, indicating the count was correct, however it was not. When the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) #106 reported to work that day at 8:00 AM, RN #5 reported the discrepancy, failing to follow facility policy on reporting discrepancies in narcotic medication counts immediately. B) Investigation RNS #106 was made aware of the discrepancy for Resident #91's liquid morphine on the narcotic medication count sheet. RNS #106 went to verify the count with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #51, confirming the bottle of liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate menus prior to meal times. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 109. Findings include: At approximately 1:38 PM on 04/22/24, it was noted the menus for 04/21/24 were still displayed outside of the Fiesta Dining Room. The Housekeeping Manager (HM) was standing outside the dining room at the time and confirmed the menus from 04/21/24 were still up after lunch service had taken place on 04/23/24. The HM was asked to accompany this surveyor across the facility to check for other places that accurate menus were not placed. Menus for 04/21/24 were found to still be displayed at the A Nurses Station and the B Nurses Station. At approximately 1:44 PM on 04/22/24, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) regarding the menus. The DM stated I had to make new menus because my truck didn't come. I just forgot to hang them up.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record for Resident #22. This was true for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 109. Findings Include: a) Resident #22 On 04/22/24 at 5:18 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #22. The review found the Physician's Scope of Orders for Treatment (POST) form was not complete. The POST form was not signed or dated by the resident or the resident representative. On 04/22/24 at 6:41 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the incomplete POST form. The DON confirmed the form was missing the signature of the resident or the resident representative as well as the date. No further information was obtained during the survey process.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it has control is as free from accident hazards as possible. The facility failed to correct the identified issue of nurses placing resident medication in medicine cups, placing the medicine cups on the bedside table or over-bed tray, and walking away without waiting to see if the medication was taken. Resident identifiers: #13, #84, #15, #92, and #26. Facility Census: 114 a) General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration Policy Section 5 of the facility's General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration Policy reads, During medication administration, Facility staff should take all measures required by Facility policy and Applicable Law, including, but not limited to the following: - 5.10 Observe the resident's consumption of the medication(s). b) Resident #13's Grievance Resident #13 filed a grievance on 07/19/23 reporting, Meds (medications) are being left on bedside table. The Director of Nursing (DON) was designated to act on the concern.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical information. Staff failed to secure medical information from those who did not have a need to know, by leaving reports on the medication carts unattended, which contained personal and medical information for resident's care. The information was in plain sight of anyone passing by in the hallway. This deficient practice was identified through a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Census: 108 Findings included: An observation, on 08/23/22 at 07:48 AM, revealed a 24-hour shift report laying on the A/B medication cart. The report contained residents names, with information regarding the residents' diagnoses, code status, vital signs, special instructions for care that could be seen by anyone passing down the hallway. An interview, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN # 49), on 08/23/22 at 07:48 AM, verified the 24-hour report was visible to those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to serve all Residents residing in the same room at the same time. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident #34 was not afforded a dignified dining experience. Resident identifier: #34. Facility census: 108. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled Meal Service, revised on 10/27/19, showed Trays are labeled with a tray card and are assembled by each employee contributing assigned service ware items. a) Resident #34 An observation on 08/22/22 12:40 PM, showed a lunch tray was delivered to Resident #34's roommate but not to Resident # 34. An observation on 08/22/22 at 12:45 PM, showed Resident #34 was sitting on bed with bedside table prepared for lunch tray delivery and watched roommate already eating lunch. During an interview on 08/22/22 at 12:47 PM, Resident #34 stated that I think they forgot me. During an interview on 08/22/22 at 12:49 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #79 stated usually staff deliver food trays to roommates together however there was a tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 28 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed correctly per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care. Resident identifier: #11. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #11 An electronic medical record review was completed on 08/22/22 at 2:58 PM. There was a 2021 Edition of the POST form in Resident #12's medical record. The Patient or Patient Representative signature line on the POST form was dated 05/31/22. Verbal consent from resident's Health Care Surrogate (HCS) had been accepted via phone by LPN #41 and LPN #49 on this date. Review of all progress notes in the electronic medical record did not reveal documentation related to the completion of the POST form or that the HCS had been asked to sign form at their earliest convenience. Review of the Using the POST Form Guidance for Health Care Professionals, 2021 Edition, revealed the following guidance for completing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that a copy of a resident's Notice of Transfer/Discharge was sent to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This was true for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #64. Facility census: 108. Findings Included: a) Resident #64 A medical record review was completed on 08/23/22 at 2:33 PM. The record review revealed Resident #64 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not reflect the Notice of Transfer was sent to the Ombudsman. During an interview on 08/24/22 at 8:36 AM, the Administrator stated the facility had no evidence a Notice of Transfer had been provided to the Ombudsman. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide resident-centered care and services, in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's needs. The facility failed to follow physician orders for the administration of insulin. This was true for two (2) of seven (7) residents reviewed for medications during the Long-term Survey Process Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #64 and #85. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #64 A medical record review, on 08/23/22 at 2:41 PM, found the following sliding scale order for insulin on Resident #64's chart: ORDER: NovoLOG (Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 151 - 200 = 4 units; 201 - 250 = 6 units; 251 - 300 = 8 units; 301 - 350 = 10 units; 351 - 400 = 12 units, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for DM [Diabetes Mellitus] II If BG [Blood Glucose] is below 70 or greater than 400 notify MD [Medical Doctor]. Subsequent reviews of the Medical Administration Records (MARS) for the months of June, July, and August 2022 found the following: - On 08/03/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility's kitchen. Resident Identifiers: #1 and #79. Facility Census: 108. Findings Included: A) Resident #1 During an interview 08/22/22 at 11:45 AM, Resident #1 stated she ate in her room for meals and that the food is cold. On 08/23/22 at 12:51 PM, temperatures were obtained on the lunch meal tray for Resident #79. (Resident #79's tray was selected because it was the last tray to be served on the same hall as Resident #1. The following temperatures were obtained by the Dietary Manager using his thermometer: -Mixed vegetables 140.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F) -Fish - 155.0 degrees F -Diced Potatoes - 122.0 degrees F During an interview on 08/22/22 at 12:53 PM, the Dietary Manager stated, The potatoes aren't climbing to the desired temperature. When asked what the desired temperature would be, the Dietary Manager replied,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to label and date food items that were opened. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents who are served food from the kitchen. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Initial Tour of Kitchen Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen, on 08/220/22 at 10:45 AM, revealed: -One (1) gallon plastic container of vanilla ice cream. Approximately 3/4 of the ice cream had been consumed. There was no opened date on the container. -One (1) ten pound opened bag of pasta. Approximately 1/5 of the pasta had been consumed. There was no opened date on the container. During an interview on 08/22/22 at 10:55 PM, [NAME] #26 acknowledged this practice did not follow facility protocol of labeling and dating all opened food items in the kitchen and did not allow the staff to ensure the food is still safe for consumption. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$65,274 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $65,274 — penalty dated 2025-05-27
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-28 for 47 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME 1 of 5Sandia Ridge CenterAlbuquerque, NM

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2018
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2016
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
KRIEGER, CORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025
PUREWAL, GUNEETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.6M
Related-party expense32% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 5%Other / private 7%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 32% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,929per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$413per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515128. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next