Parkersburg Center
1716 Gihon Road, Parkersburg, WV 26101 · For profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (304) 485-5511 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,562 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.2% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.3% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.4% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.3% | 15.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.4% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.2% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.6% | 13.4% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.5% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.4% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.0% | 11.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.96 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.4%CMS range 29.3–54.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 9.1–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.6–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 63.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-10 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were ordered honey and nectar thickened liquids received liquids at a correct consistency. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for thickened liquids. Providing a resident with the wrong consistency of liquids could result in choking, aspiration pneumonia which can lead to serious harm and or death if not immediately corrected. This situation could occur again and have the likelihood of resulting in serious injury or death for any residents requiring thickened liquids.This failed practice was a random opportunity of discovery and the State Agency (SA) determined this to be an immediate jeopardy situation. Resident identifiers: #1 and #24 Facility Census: #63.Findings include: a) Resident #1On 12/08/25 at 12:10 PM an observation found that Resident #1 was ordered honey thickened liquids but had a bottle of water and a facility pitcher of thin water at bedside. She was eating her lunch meal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed and met the nutritional needs of the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Menus stated menus will be planned in advance to meet the resident's nutritional needs. Menus will be served as written unless a substitution is provided in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special need. Menus will be posted. On 12/07/2025, the posted menu in the dining included: Turkey, Cornbread, Dressing, Broccoli, Rolls, Pumpkin Pie and Whipped Topping. The Week at a Glance Menu stated the following items were to be served: Maple Sage Turkey,, Dinner Roll, Homemade Pumpkin Pie w/Whipped Topping, Seasoned Peas and Cornbread Dressing. The lunch meal that was served included: Turkey, Cauliflower, Pumpkin Cake, and Cornbread. On 12/07/2025 at 01:20 PM in the Dining Room, Recreation Assistant #6 confirmed rolls,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the food served to the residents was palatable, attractive and prepared by methods that conserved the nutritive value, flavor, and appearance of the food. Resident Identifiers: #36, #14, and #40. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) On 12/08/2025 at 11:55 AM, the state survey team tested a lunch tray for palatability. It was determined the scalloped potatoes had chewy edges and were not soft. they had an inconsistent consistency. The Salisbury steak was judged to be tough, hard to cut and had crunchy edges. The vegetables were judged to be too soft, especially the broccoli, and have no seasoning. These findings were confirmed by the Regulatory Compliance Officer at 12:05 PM. b) On 12/07/2025 at 2:10 PM, Resident #36 reported the food was awful and the food was never hot .always lukewarm. On 12/08/2025 at 03:50PM, when the resident was asked about today's lunch, Oh, I can't eat that. The potatoes were okay and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to ensure effective administrative oversight related to freedom from neglect and abuse, quality of care, staffing, infection control, dietary services, investigation and reporting of incidents, staff training, and an immediate jeopardy situation that affected multiple residents. Facility Census: 63Findings include:During the survey conducted from 12/07/25 through 12/10/25, the following concerns were identified:a) Failure to Investigate and Report Facility Reportable Incidents (FRIs):Review of facility records revealed the facility failed to ensure reportable incidents were thoroughly investigated and that the results were reported to the State Agency within five (5) working days, with appropriate corrective actions taken. This was found to be true for eight (8) of nine (9) residents reviewed.b)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment. These failed practice findings were random acts of discovery. Room Identifiers: #225, #226, #229 and #222. Facility Census: #63Findings Include: a) Room # 225 On 12/07/25 at 11:40 AM upon the initial observations and interview the window blinds by Resident #60 were found to be broken and missing. b) room [ROOM NUMBER] On 12/07/25 at 11:45 AM upon the initial observations and interview the privacy curtain by Resident #1 was found to be dirty with a dark brown substance. c) room [ROOM NUMBER] On 12/07/25 at 12:05 PM upon the initial observations and interview the floor at the head of the bed (under the pole holding the tube feeding) for Resident #9 was dirty. There were sticky, dirty spots on the floor where the feeding appeared to have leaked or spilled and the entire floor was dirty and had a sticky substance on it. The above findings were confirmed with the Environmental Services Manager #78…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and/or neglect by refusing to toilet/Change residents and treating a resident who had a fall that resulted an facture. This failed practice was found true during the long-term care survey process and had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the long-term care facility. Resident Identifier #21, #66, and #50. Facility Census: 63.Findings include: a) Resident #21 Record review completed on12/08/25 2:15 PM of a reported incident (FRI) was reviewed and found to be true according to the credible evidence provided by the facility. As written on the five (5) day follow up – The resident reported that she is able to get up and walk to the bathroom but CNA's tell her to just soil her brief. It was reported to APS, OHFLAC, and Ombudsman. Skin check was completed on 10/25/25. On October 23, 2025 (Facility name here) Care Center reported an allegation of neglect for Resident #21. (resident name here) alleges that Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate reportable incidents and report the results of those investigations to the State Agency within five (5) working days of the incident and if the alleged violation was verified include the appropriate corrective action taken. This was found to be true for eight (8) of nine (9) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #6, #14, #15, #24, #35, #39, #56, #57, and #68. Facility census: 63. a) Resident #15 During the survey process between 12/07/25 through 12/10/25, reviewed the facility reported incident (FRI) documents from 11/03/25 regarding Resident #15. There were no documentation readily available of staff interviews conducted during the investigation. There were no documentation readily available to demonstrated that the facility submitted a five (5) day follow up investigation report to the State Agency. These findings were verified with the facility Administrator on 12/09/25 at approximately 12:30 p.m. b) Resident #39 During the survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program when a new mental health diagnosis or change in condition is presented. This was found to be true for four (4) of five (5) residents during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #44, #56, #59, and #5. Facility census: 63Findings included: a) Resident #56 The resident's PASARR was completed on 08/19/24 at another facility. Diagnoses on this PASRR included Bipolar disorder and depression, unspecified. Upon review of the medical record, the resident had the following diagnoses related to mental health upon admission to the nursing home facility: BIPOLAR DISORDER, CURRENT EPISODE MANIC WITHOUT PSYCHOTIC FEATURES, UNSPECIFIED 8/9/2024 Upon Admission/Readmission The PASARR was completed as a Level I, with no Level II required. During the resident's stay at the facility, she received a new diagnosis of: MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, resident interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and care were provided to dependent residents for showers, oral care and grooming. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #28, #56, #23. Facility Census: 63.Findings included: a) Resident #28 The facility's policy and procedure for Oral Health stated, Oral hygiene will be performed, at a minimum, two (2) times per day (morning and night - after dinner, if possible). The facility's policy and procedure for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) stated a patient who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary level of ADL assistance to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #28 had a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side. The resident's care plan interventions started to provide resident with dependent assist of one (1) to two (2) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review resident interviews and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, through facility-sponsored group activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, This found practice has the potential to affect more than a minimal number of resident residing in the long term care facility. Facility Census: 63.Findings include:a) ObservationAn observation on 12/08/25 at 11:00 AM of the large Monthly Activity Program Calendar posted near the facilities nurses stated to have the same activities each week other than a few volunteer days, and showed Monday through Friday the last activity was at 4:30 PM and was a Movie. On Saturday and Sunday, the last activity was at 5:00 PM which was Dinner and Movie that would interrupt for some a dignified dining experience.Further observation revealed there were no locations on the calendar where these activities would be held.b) Record review A review completed on 12/09/25 of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and take action on the consultant pharmacist's recommendations on irregularities found in residents' drug regimen reviews. This was found to be true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #44, #59, #14. Facility census: 63Findings included: A) Resident #44A review of Resident #44's medical record documents the resident had the following diagnoses as it relates to psychosocial health: SCHIZOPHRENIA, UNSPECIFIED 4/28/2022 Upon admissionANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED 4/28/2022 Upon Admission/ReadmissionAUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS 4/28/2022 Upon Admission/ReadmissionVISUAL HALLUCINATIONS 4/28/2022 Upon Admission/ReadmissionMAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE, MILD 6/11/2025 During Stay GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER 9/4/2024 During StayUNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY 6/20/2023 During StayThe resident had the following physician orders as it related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 63.Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedures for Food Storage: Cold Foods stated, all foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage: Dry Goods stated, all food would be stored according to the Food and Drug Administration) (FDA) Food Code. and that the food storage areas would be neat, arranged for easy identification and the date marked as appropriate. b) On 12/07/2025 at 11:35 AM, the kitchen investigation was initiated. The following items were found and verified by [NAME] #62: Dry Storage - Beverage cart was sitting in the dry food storage area for lunch. The cart contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse disposed of properly by blocking trash cans This had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 63. Findings included:a) According to the facility's policy and procedure, garbage and refuse will be disposed of in a safe and efficient manner. The policy and procedure indicated the Dining Service Director (DSD) would ensure lined containers wiould be available within the food service area and garbage and refuse would be removed routinely from the kitchen area during the day and at the end of the workday.b) On 12/07/2025 at 11:35 AM, during the initial kitchen observation, five (5) empty and opened boxes were under the handwashing sink on the floor covering the trash can. A plunger was under the boxes. The boxes had to be moved to dispose of paper towels when the state surveyor's hands were washed. Dietary [NAME] #62 confirmed the boxes on the floor and difficulty disposing of paper towels after hand hygiene was completed.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program by staff not wearing masks during COVID outbreak and staff leaving ice scoops in ice containers. These were random opportunities for discovery during the survey process. Facility census 63. Findings included: a) On 12/07/25 at approximately 11:30 a.m., upon initial entry observed that the facility was under COVID outbreak and observed Employee #18 and Employee #42 sitting at the nurse's station not wearing any masks. Reviewed the facility's COVID outbreak policy and policy requires all staff to wear masks during outbreak. Interview on 12/07/25 at approximately 11:38 AM with Employee #20 verified that during a COVID outbreak all staff were required to wear masks inside of the facility. b) On 12/07/25 at 12:00 PM, the state surveyor observed no separate container for the ice scoop as drinks were passed on the 200 Hall. The ice scoops were placed in the ice bucket. Nurse Aide (NA) #24 confirmed the scoop was in the ice container during the drink pass and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. for the freezer. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 63.Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Safety as related to kitchen and associated equipment safety stated, the equipment will be properly maintained and the Dining Service Director Will ensure that all equipment is in proper working condition and equipped with safety guards, as appropriate. b) On 12/07/2025 at 12:10 PM, ice and significant frost was observed by the state surveyor on the right side of the freezer door during the initial kitchen inspection. Small ice drips were frozen on the freezer's fan, and a large block of ice was formed under the freezer fan. Dietary [NAME] #62 confirmed the finding and reported there was no frost this morning and that it must have been when the dietary aide was going in and out of the freezer.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure twelve hours of in-service education for nurse aides, which includes dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. This was found to be true for three (3) of five (5) nurse aide personnel reviewed during the long term care recertification process. Staff identifiers: #24, #9, #54, #43, #21. Census: 63 Findings included: A) Nurse Aide (NA) #9 Nurse Aide #9 only had sixteen (16) minutes of dementia management training during the twelve-month period from 12/01/24 to 11/30/25. This falls short of the two hours minimum required annually. B) Nurse Aide (NA) #43 Nurse Aide #43 had a hire date of 09/17/25. She only had twenty-four (24) minutes of dementia management training during the period from 09/17/25 through 11/30/25. This fails to comply with WV regulations of receiving two hours of education within her first 30 days or at next orientation. She also had not been educated on resident abuse prevention, or resident rights. The Nurse Aide had no competencies completed prior to assuming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review, resident interviews, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to honor resident's preferences for showers.This was found to be true for two (2) of eleven (11) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #6, and #56. Facility census: 63. Findings included: A) Resident #6 During an interview with the resident on 12/07/25 at approximately noon, the resident stated he would like to get a shower. He stated, All they do is give me a bed bath. Resident's hair appeared oily, and hair did not look like it had been combed. He had facial beard growth of a few days length. A review of the resident's current care plan, developed on 03/10/25, documents, It is important to me to shower. The facility's shower/bathing schedule showed Resident #6 was scheduled showers for Wednesdays and Saturdays on day shift. A review of the ADL tasks for showering for the last three (3) months documents the following: 9/9/25 through 9/16/25 no bath or showers documented 9/17/25, Wednesday 1:18 PM shower provided 09/18/25-09/20/25 no bath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving verbal abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the long-term care facility. Resident identifier: #35 Facility census: 63. Findings include:Review on 12/10/25 of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) revealed the Initial Reporting of Allegations for verbal abuse which should be reported immediately or within two (2) hours had a date and time of 12/18/25 12:00 AM.Further record review of the FRI revealed there no fax or email confirmation of when the incident was reported.Continued record review on 12/10/25 revealed the incident happened on 11/18/25 according to some immediately witness statements taken, however no time of incident was noted in that statement. Other witness statements taken were on 11/25/25 and 11/26/25 which were 6 days after the allegation of verbal abuse was made.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 4:24 PM with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the appropriate documentation when a resident was transferred out of the facility to the hospital. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: #63. Findings Include: a) Resident #9On 12/09/25 at 1:15 PM record review of hospitalizations for Resident #9 shows she was transferred to the hospital on the following days.08/20/25 no bed hold documentation available09/15/25 no transfer documentation available09/22/25 no bed hold documentation availableAccording to the Policy OPS404 Discharge and Transfer for a resident being transferred to a hospital includes but is not limited to the following:5.1 For unplanned, acute transfers, the patients must be permitted to return to the Center. Prior to the transfer, the patient and patient representative will be notified verbally followed by written notification using the Notice of Hospital Transfer or state specific transfer form. 5.3 For any hospital transfers, the following will be sent to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive care plan was revised relating to a resident using a straw, tube feeding orders, a urinary (Foley) catheter, an actual pressure ulcer and a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in place. These were random opportunities of discovery. Resident Identifiers: #9 and #11. Facility Census: #63Findings Include: a) Resident #9 On 12/08/25 at 11:55 AM record review shows that Resident #9 has orders for Enteral Feed Order every shift. Osmolite 1.5 Cal. 60 ml/hr. Runs for 22 hours/day with downtime from 1100-1300 (11:00 AM to 1:00 PM). 25ml H20 flushes every 4 hours. There are no current orders for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line, urinary foley catheter or pressure ulcer treatment. Review of the care plan states: Resident at risk for skin breakdown related to actual pressure ulcer, decreased activity, frail fragile skin, impaired sensation, incontinence, Foley catheter in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to treat a fall for Resident #66 and failed to administer medications in a timely manner as ordered by the physician for Resident #9. These failed practices were random opportunities for discovery during the long term care survey process and had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the long term care facility. Resident identifier #66 and #9 Facility census: 63 Findings include: a) Resident #66 Record review completed on 12/10/25 at 9:38 AM of a facility reported incident (FRI) revealed the facility substantiated that a resident was neglected. As written on the five (5) day follow up – To whom it concerns: While conducting an investigation into an injury of unknown origin regarding the long-term care facility Resident #66, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported that she had previously been notified in report resident #66 had sustained a fall on 2/28/2024. Resident #66's roommate, who is alert and oriented, also confirmed that he had a fall on 2/28/24 and a nurse and CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for residents by transporting oxygen without a carrier and not documenting a fall that resulted in a fracture. These were failed practices were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier # 66. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure stated, the center staff will report, review and investigate all accidents/incidents which occurred, or allegedly occurred, on or off Center property involving, or allegedly involving, a patient who is receiving services. and the licensed nurse will Report accidents/incidents and assist with completion of a timely investigation to determine root cause. The facility's policy and procedure for Oxygen High Pressure Cylinders stated the cylinders must be properly secured to prevent accidental tipping of the tank and possible rupture causing high pressure release of gasses. and cylinders must be in a secured stand. Full oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide nutritional and hydration care and services to a resident that is dependent on tube feed for nutritional and hydration. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for tube feeding. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident #9 On 12/07/25 at 2:45 PM it was observed Resident #9 had no tube feeding or water infusing. Upon checking the current orders it was found that Resident #9 was ordered: Enteral Feed Order: every shift Osmolite 1.5 CAL 60 ml/hr. Runs for 22 hours/day with downtime from 1100-1300 and 25 ml of H20 flushes every 4 hours. Order also stated 25 ml of H20 flushes every 4 hours. Hanging on the tube feed pole was Y-tubing which allows simultaneous or separate administration of feedings (formula/nutrition) and water (flushing/hydration) through different ports on the same connection. Upon approaching the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #102 the surveyor asked LPN #102 to check the order for the tube feeding to see when it was to begin. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to manage tube feeding care management as required. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: #63.Findings Include: a) Resident #9 On 12/07/25 at 2:45 PM it was observed that the tube feeding syringe used during administration did not have the current date on it as required. There was noo date on the syringe.According to the Procedure: Enteral Feeding: Administration by pump under 2) Gather supplies. 2.14 Clean bag or container for storing syringe and administration connector cover (to be changed every 24 hours) labeled with patient's name, date and start time.27. Rinse and dry syringe. Separately store syringe and barrel before storing in labeled and dated plastic bag or container. [NAME] can be used for up to 24 hours. It was confirmed on 12/07/25 at 2:48 PM with the Administrator that the syringe should have the current date on it and only used daily.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information on 07/05//25, 07/06/25, and 12/07/25.This was found to be true for three (3) of thirteen days reviewed during the long term care survey process. Facility Census: 63 a) Upon entrance to the facility for the recertification survey on 12/07/25 at approximately 11:25 AM, the nursing schedule was posted in a prominent location, and contained the required data elements. However, the data which was posted was for the calendar day of 12/05/25. A review of the time detail report from the facility's timekeeping system documents the posted nurse staffing data hours were not consistent with the data from the time detail report. Discrepancies were as follows: Posted Daily Nurse Staffing Form for 07/05/25 Registered Nurse Hours totaled 24 hoursLicensed Practical Nurse Hours totaled 24 hoursCertified Nurse Aide Hours totaled 96.75 hours Time Detail Reports for 07/05/25 Registered Nurse Hours totaled 23.97 hoursLicensed Nurse Hours totaled 24.93 hoursCertified Nurse Hours totaled 98.97 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide an assistive device as ordered by the physician during the dinner meal. Theis was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #17. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #17 The facility's policy and procedure for Assistive Devices stated assistive devices/utensils will be provided as identified on the individualized plan of care to maintain or improve a resident's/patient's ability to eat or drink independently. On 12/08/2025 at 06:2025 PM, Resident #17 was observed during the dinner meal. The resident's tray card stated in all capital letters two (2) times on the tray ticket with one in larger print and one in bold print, FOOD IN BOWLS. The resident did not receive his food in bowls for his entree or side, but did receive his dessert in a bowl. Nursing Assistant #9 confirmed the resident did not receive his food in bowls per his tray ticket. sand order. The resident's dietary order stated, regular diet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate physician order for thin liquids via straw. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier #11. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: Resident #11 a) On 12/07/2025, a dining room observation was initiated. Resident #52 had a straw in a [NAME] Cup in her wheelchair cup holder in the dining room during the lunch meal and a straw in her water pitcher in her room at bedside. At 1:35 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #52 verified the resident's tray card for 2 Handled cup w/no lid, Food in mugs, [NAME] Cup, and NO STRAWS The resident and Nursing Aide (NA) #52 the resident had been using straws in the dining room and her room. At 1:35 PM, NA #52 verified the resident's tray card for 2 Handled cup w/no lid, Food in mugs, [NAME] Cup, and NO STRAWS. According to North Coast Medical and Rehabilitation Products, a [NAME] Cup is a Lightweight,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow its policy for residents who choose to smoke or vape.This was found to be true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier:#56 Census: 63 Findings included:A) Resident #56During the interview with this resident on 12/07/25 at 1:20 PM, the resident was complaining about the facility changing the designated smoking schedule, and having staff accompany her to smoke, as well as use of the smoking apron. A review of her care plan contained the following:Focus area:During my Preferences for Customary Routine Interview, there were daily routine preferences noted as important. The most important things for the center staff to know about my preferred daily routine are: smoking outside. Date initiated: 08/21/24. Surveyor explained to the resident the use of the smoking apron and having staff to accompany the residents outside were for the resident's own safety.A review of the resident's medical record documented a smoking assessment was last completed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-23 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to have an infection preventionist. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Infection Preventionist During an interview, on 01/22/24 at 12:11 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), stated, I do the Infection preventionist job. We also have a lady that works down the road, that has had the class that helps me with it. On 01/22/24 at 1:30 PM the DON confirmed there are no staff currently employed at this facility who have completed the specialized training and hold an Infection Preventionist Certificate of training.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified dining experience. Residents dining together were not served at the same time. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #8, #25, #31, #29, #27, #1, #58, #10, #28, and #38. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Dining room observations On 01/16/24 at 12:01 PM, Residents #8, #25, #31, and #29, were observed sitting together at table. #1. Residents #27, #1, #58, and #10 were observed sitting together at table #2 . Resident #28 was sitting at table #3 by themselves. Resident #38 was seated at table #4 by themselves. The trays were served in this order: Resident #29, was served at table #1 Resident #58 was served at table #2 Resident #38 was served at table #4 Resident #8 was served at table #1 Resident #31 served at table #1 Resident #1 served at table #2. Resident #1 required assistance to eat; therefore, the tray was left sitting in front of her while other residents were eating their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable homelike environment by not cleaning the heater/air conditioning unit filter in Resident #48's room and by not ensuring the dining room chairs are in good repair. This was a random opportunity for discovery, and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #48. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #48 An observation of Resident #48's room on 01/16/24 at 2:00 PM, it was discovered the heater had dust flying out of it and the filters were covered with dirt and dust. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 2:30 PM, Resident #48 stated, I haven't been in this room long, who knows when they cleaned it last. They haven't cleaned it since I have been in here. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 03:36 PM, the Maintenance Assistant (MA) #60 stated, Oh my goodness, yes that is dirty. I am gonna go look to see when is the last time it was cleaned. It won't be dirty after today. During a record review on 01/17/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and observation the facility failed to implement and/or develop care plans for three (3) of 18 sampled residents. For Resident #52 the facility failed to develop a care plan for the resident's use of an anticoagulant medication. Also, Resident #52's fall care plan was not implemented. For Resident #24 the facility failed to implement their dementia care plan. Finally, for Resident #50 the facility failed to implement his catheter care plan. Resident identifiers: #52, #50, and #24. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #52 1. Anticoagulant A review of Resident #52's care plan on 01/22/24, found a physician order for Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) five (5) milligrams twice a day. This order was written on 07/06/23 and was a current order at the time of this review. A review of Resident #52's care plan found it was void of any focus statements, goals, or interventions related to Resident #52's use of this anticoagulant medication. On 01/23/24 at 9:05 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #52's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to develop an activity program to meet the needs and interest of the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #4, #24, and #14. Facility census 63. Findings include: a) Activity Program During the Resident Council Meeting on 01/17/24 at 2:00 PM the Resident Council members complained there was not much to do at the facility anymore and there was not anything to do in the evening except go to bed. During a record review on 01/18/24 at 10:00 AM of the facilities activity calendars for 10/2023, 11/2023, 12/2023, and 01/2024 a noticeable difference was noted in the amount of activities offered and the type of activities offered. In 10/2023 there were at least 5 activities offered daily and 2 days a week activities were offered at 7:00 PM in the evening. In January 2024 on most days there were only 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Initial tour of the kitchen On 01/16/24 at 7:40 AM, observation of the stove found the drip pan, oven racks, and the oven floor had a heavy build of a charred black substance. The ovens backsplash also had a build up debris. The metal grates covering the burners also had a build up of black, dried debris. Dietary Manager (DM) #10 stated he had boiled oatmeal earlier this morning which had covered the burner; however, all the burners were littered with charred debris. b) Fruit During an observation on 01/16/24 at 12:14 PM, of the lunch meal it was discovered that none of the individual bowls of fruit cocktail on the Resident's lunch trays were covered. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 12:31 PM, Nursing Assistant (NA) #16 stated, The fruit is usually covered with cellophane or it's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing infection control program aimed at preventing the spread of diseases and infections. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #7, #60, #4, #10, #22, #23. Facility Census 63. a) Surveillance Log During a record review, on 01/22/24 at 1:00 PM, of the facilities Infection Control Monthly Line Listing it was revealed that no infections had been tracked for December 2023 and January 2024. During an interview on 01/22/24 at 01:16 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Our Nurse Practice Educator (NPE), eft around the 1st of December and our new one started yesterday, our line listing has not been updated since she left at the first of December. During a record review, on 01/22/24 at 3:39 PM, the following residents were listed as examples of residents who had infections, were receiving an antibiotic in December 2023 and/or January 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of choices received written notice of a room move and an explanation of why the room change was needed. Resident identifier: #14. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #14 On 01/16/24 at 8:11 AM, the resident said she recently returned from the hospital and did not return to her original room. She said, I understand I had no bed hold and that was OK, but I got moved to one room when I got back and then 2 days later, I had to go to another room. When asked why she was moved, the resident said she was told she needed to move, and she would have more room if she moved. She said she really didn't want to move, and she frequently gets moved all over the place. Record review found the resident returned to the facility from a hospital admission on [DATE]. She was placed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A. On 01/04/23 the resident was moved to room [ROOM NUMBER]-B. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14's grievance related to missing nightgowns was resolved promptly. This was true for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. Resident identifier: #14. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #14 A review of the facility's grievances for the previous year found a grievance form dated 12/13/23. Resident #14 made the grievance because she was missing one (1) pink and one (1) dark purple nightgown. She also indicated there were no lift pads at times. The recommended corrective actions taken by the facility was to replace the gowns and (name of hospice company) providing lift pads. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 01/17/24 at approximately 8:30 AM the surveyor requested documentation showing they had ordered the gowns. On the afternoon of 01/17/24 the NHA provided documentation showing the gowns had been ordered. Review of the computer printout provided by the NHA found the gowns were ordered on 01/17/24 at 9:24 AM which was after surveyor intervention.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to send information which included medications, diagnosis, advance directives, representative contact information, and any other necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. This was found to be true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #14 and #51. Facility census: 64. Findings include a) Resident #51 On 01/17/24 at 9:45 AM, record review found the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record found a note on 01/09/24, which read a report was called to the emergency room. There was no information indicating if any documentation was sent with the resident at the time of discharge. b) Resident #14 On 12/17/23 the resident was sent to the emergency room due a low oxygen saturation rate of 84%. The facility contacted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were completed with accurate information when two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization were transferred to the hospital. Resident identifiers: #51 and #14. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #51 Record review found Resident #51 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. At 10:00 AM on 01/17/23, the business Office Manager (BOM) #79 provided a completed copy of the bed hold policy sent to the Resident at the time of discharge indicating the resident had no bed hold days available. The BOM confirmed the Resident's payer source was through the Veterans Administration (VA) and the VA would have paid for three (3) bed hold days; however, the form documented the resident had no bed hold days available. b) Resident #14 Record review found the resident was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] due a low oxygen saturation rate of 84%. The facility contacted the hospital on [DATE] and found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurately and reflected one (1) of 18 resident's status. Resident identifier: #3. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #3 On 01/16/24 at 8:29 AM, the resident said, I am blind, I see only light. I have fallen several times due to my eyesight. Review of the resident's medical record found the following falls: 04/08/23, the resident fell in his room after his roommate told him to get up and go to the bathroom by himself- he did not take his walker fell to the floor. 04/21/23, the resident fell in his room while staff were assisting him. 05/20/23, the resident fell while his brother was assisting him back from the bathroom. 05/23/23, the resident was found on the floor while ambulating from the bedside commode back to his recliner. 05/26/23, the resident was found sitting on the floor. 07/13/23, the resident fell while trying to find his shoes. An admission MDS with an assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) with a diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. This failed practice was found for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #28. Facility census: 63. Finding included: a) Resident #28 On 01/17/24 at 2:15 PM, record review showed Resident #28 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia upon admission; however, this was not on the PASARR from the hospital. On 01/17/24 at 2:42 PM, an interview with Social Worker (SW) #32 confirmed the facility did not have PASARR which documented Resident #28 has a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. SW #32 said a new PASARR would be completed today.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission which included current physician's orders for treatment with antibiotics. This was true for one (1) of one (1) new admission. Resident identifier: #23. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #23 Record review found Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At the time of admission, the resident was receiving the antibiotic, Cefdinir, for treatment of a urinary tract infection. In addition, the resident was receiving a topical antibiotic, Mupirocin to the bilateral lower extremities for a diagnosis of cellulitis. At 8:15 AM on 01/23/24, the unit manager Licensed Practical Nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed the antibiotic usage should have been listed on the 48-hour care plan. On 01/23/24 at 8:22 AM, the above information was discussed with the administrator. No further information was provided by the close of the survey.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to revise Resident #60's care plan when her urinary catheter was removed. This was true for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. Resident Identifier: Resident #60. Facility Census: 63. Findings Included: a) Resident #60 An observation of Resident #60 on the morning of 01/16/24 found she had no indwelling urinary catheter. A review of Resident #60's care plan on 01/17/24 found the following active care plan: Focus Statement: (First Name of Resident #60) requires indwelling Foley catheter due to: other: retention. This focus statement was added to care plan on 12/19/23. The goal associated with this focus statement read: Resident will have no signs and symptoms of Urinary tract infection X 30 days. This goal had a target date of 03/12/24. The interventions included: --Monitor for signs and symptoms of infection and report to physician. -- Monitor output for odor, color, consistency, and amount. -- Provide Privacy and comfort. -- Monitor urine for sediment, cloudy, odor, blood and amount. -- Report to physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of activities of daily living received services for personal hygiene. Resident identifier: #14. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #14 On 01/16/24 at 8:11 AM, the resident said you have to be scheduled to get a shower and you can only have two (2) a week. I would like to get a shower more often than I do, my hair gets matted up in between the few showers I get here. Review of the resident bathing / shower schedule from 11/16/23 through 01/16/24 found the Resident received a shower on 11/19/23 and 01/16/24. The Resident was discharged from the facility on 12/17/23 and returned on 01/03/24. On 01/16/24 at 3:18 PM, the Resident's Nurse Aide (NA) #71, said the Resident receives bed baths because she doesn't like getting a shower. NA #71 said we did have a shower chair that we used to take her to the shower but she started doing bed baths. Sometimes she just says it's too cold in the shower room. On 01/17/24 at 9:10 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to follow a physician's order in regards to blood sugar monitoring for Resident #10. This failed practice was found true for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census 63. Findings Include a) Resident #10 A record review on 01/18/24 at 9:30 AM found Resident #10 was ordered NovoLog FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector to be injected per sliding scale. Call the doctor for a blood sugar over 341. Review of Resident #10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) found on 01/17/24 Resident #10's blood sugar was 422. Resident #10's medical record had no mention of the doctor being contacted. During an interview on 01/18/24 at 10:44 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated, This was a different doctor and he has a different scale. The other doctor doesn't like to be called unless a resident's blood sugar is over 450. That's no excuse though, they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the residents environment over which it had control of was free from accident hazards. A prescription cream was found at Resident #40's bedside. Interventions for fall prevention were not in place for Resident #52. This failed practice was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for accidents during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #40, #52. Facility Census 63. Findings include: a) Resident #40 Observation on 01/16/24 at 8:25 AM, found a tube of prescription Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream at the Resident's bedside. During an interview on 01/16/24 at 9:30 AM with Resident #40, she states, I put the cream on in the morning and in the evening . There is a resident that is confused that wonders in my room, poor thing. But he doesn't bother me. A second observation on 01/16/24 at 03:42 PM, found the Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream continues to be at the Reediest's bedside. A third observation on 01/17/24 at 8:15 AM, found the Triamcinolone Acetonide cream continues to be at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter had a proper medical justification for its use. Also the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter receives the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of urinary catheter use. Resident Identifiers: Resident #60 and Resident #50. Facility census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident #60 An observation of Resident #60 on the morning of 01/16/24 found she had no indwelling urinary catheter. A review of Resident #60's care plan on 01/17/24 found the following active care plan: Focus Statement: (First Name of Resident #60) requires indwelling Foley catheter due to: other: retention. This focus statement was added to care plan on 12/19/23. The goal associated with this focus statement read: Resident will have no signs and symptoms of Urinary tract infection X 30 days. This goal had a target date of 03/12/24. The interventions included: --Monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to make sure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Staff identifiers: #66 and #14. Facility census: 63. Findings Include: On 01/22/24 at 3:27 PM, review of Nurse Aide #66 and Licensed Practical Nurse #14's personal files did not include any documentation that these staff could demonstrate the skill sets to perform their duties as directed. On 01/23/24 at 8:26 AM, the administrator confirmed she was unable to provide evidence of competency evaluations for NA #66 and LPN #14.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents at the facility. Staff identifier: #66. Facility census: 63. Findings Include: a) Nurse Aide (NA) #66 On 01/22/24 at 3:27 PM, review of NA #66's personnel record found no evidence of a yearly performance review. At 8:26 AM on 01/23/24, the Administrator said she was unable to provide a copy of a yearly performance review for NA #66. No further information was provided by the close of the survey.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60's controlled substances which were signed out on the controlled substance log were documented as administered on the medication administration record (MAR). This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: Resident #60. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #60 A review of Resident #60's medical record on 01/22/24 at 1:44 PM, found the resident was ordered oxycodone 10 milligrams (MG) by mouth every six (6) hours as needed for pain. Further review of Resident #60's MAR and the control substances log for Resident #60's oxycodone for the months of 12/2023 and 01/2024 found the following occasions when Resident #60's oxycodone was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide a Pneumococcal immunization as required. This failed practice was found true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for immunizations during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: # 40. Facility Census 63. Findings include: a) Resident #40 During a record review, on 01/22/24 at 1:24 PM, of Resident # 40's vaccines it was found that she had the Prevnar (PCV) 13 vaccine on 11/05/21 and was not given a second vaccination as required. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommends: The second dose of PPSV23 be given at least 8 weeks after PCV13 and 5 years after PPSV23 (Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine.) During an interview, on 01/22/24 at 1:46 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I know what happened. Resident #40 was out at the hospital and the order did not get put back in, so I am assuming that is what happened. She has not had the PPSV 23.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to keep odors maintained, emptying of bedside commodes, repairing of broken pipes in the kitchen, repairing chipped paint in the kitchen, keeping floors clean in the kitchen and not keeping drain odors in bathroom contained. Facility census 62. Findings included: a) Dirty floors On 4/25/22 at 10:35 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen observed floors to be very dirty with brown substance stuck to the floor. Director Food/ Nutrition Services #62 stated, the staff mop after lunch every day. Asked if the kitchen floor is on a deep cleaning schedule and Director Food/Nutrition Services #62 stated when housekeeping can but, they are working behind. On 4/26/21 at 8:45 AM, interview with Cooperate Chef stated, I did not leave the facility until 11 PM on 4/25/22 due to cleaning of dietary department floor. Cooperate Chef stated, I had to pour boiling water on floor to get dirt to lift. The floor was also scrubbed with a scrubbing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in an environment that promoted dignity for each resident. Based on a random opportunity for discovery, Resident #34 was noted to have a sign above the bed with personal care needs addressed which would be visible to any person entering the resident's room. Resident identifier: Resident #34. Facility census: 62. Findings included: a) Resident #34 An observation, on 04/25/22 at 11:03 AM, revealed a sign posted above Resident #34's bed noting No blood pressure or needle sticks to be performed to the right arm. An interview, on 04/26/22 at 9:48 AM, with the facility's Administrator, verified there was a sign, with resident care information, above the resident's bed. Additionally, the Administrator stated because of dignity issues, no signs should be posted above resident's beds to provide information. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 24 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). The POST forms were unsigned by the Resident or Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). Resident identifiers: Resident #6 and #40. Facility census: 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #6 Record review on 04/25/22 at 3:01 PM found a POST Form on Resident #6's chart was unsigned by the Resident or MPOA. (Patient/Patient MPOA representative/surrogate signature required). The POST form was dated 07/05/21. During an interview on 04/26/22 at 10:06 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #6's POST form was incomplete without a Resident or MPOA signature. b) Resident #40 Record review on 04/25/22 at 3:05 PM found a POST Form on Resident #40's chart was unsigned by the Resident or MPOA. (Patient/Patient MPOA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update care plan and [NAME], this is true for (1) one of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. Resident identifier #57. Facility Census 62 Findings included: a) Resident #57 On 04/25/22 at 3:00 PM, review of Care Plan did not show resident receiving a bedside commode and showed one (1) person assist with toileting. [NAME] also did not show bedside commode being utilized and showed independent with toileting. On 4/26/22 at 1:00 PM, interview with IP (infection preventionist) Registered Nurse #22 and verified Care Plan was not updated, Resident #57 utilized bedside commode when resident #57 tested positive for covid six (6) weeks ago and will not let staff take bedside commode out of room now. IP RN #22 stated, information in Care Plan and [NAME] had not been update to reflect current plan of care for resident #57 and will update Care Plan and [NAME] immediately. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation , record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required respiratory care, was provided that care in accordance with professional standards of practice and in accordance with the resident's plan of care. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTSP) who were receiving oxygen therapy. Resident identifier: Resident #49. Census: 62 Findings included: a) Resident #49 A review of the Policy titled: Oxygen Therapy via Nasal Cannula, with an effective date of 12/01/06, noted that oxygen therapy would be administered as ordered by a physician and would include the correct flow rate, mode of delivery and frequency. A record review for Resident #49 showed a current order which started on 03/29/22, for the resident to receive oxygen therapy at four (4) Liters per minute. An observation of the oxygen administration for Resident #49, on 04/25/22 at 01:52 PM, revealed the oxygen flow rate was set on six (6) Liters per minute. An interview with the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to identify a pharmacist's recommendations made during the Medication Regimen Review (MRR). The MRR was not reported to the physician or acted upon in a timely manner. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: 51. Facility census: 62. Findings include: a)Resident (R) #51 Review of the medical record on 04/26/22, revealed R #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The pharmacist progress note written 04/08/22 identifies comments/recommendations made during the monthly MRR and states see report. The medical record is silent for this report. During an interview on 04/26/22 at 1:06 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged she did not download the last medication regimen reviews. The DON reported she was unaware the pharmacists had made any recommendations for R #51 and confirmed the physician was not notified. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility, failed to label and date foods in the refrigerator and to keep the utensil drawer clean and organized in a sanitary manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents who receive nutrients from the kitchen. Facility Census 62 Findings included; a) Kitchen On 4/25/22 at 10:35 AM initial tour the kitchen with Director Food/Nutrition Services #62. Observed in walk in refrigerator a pitcher of ice tea not label and dated. Observed an open to air stick of butter not covered and dated. Director Food/Nutrition Services #62 immediately discarded items observed. Continuing with initial tour of the kitchen found utensils drawer to have an excessive amount of debris and utensils were mixed together in no sanitary manner. Director of Food/Nutrition Services #62 agreed that the utensil drawer needed cleaned and organized. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation , staff and resident interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was sanitary and with functioning equipment. This deficient practice was identified during a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident #17 did not have a functioning toilet and the portable toilet used was not maintained in a sanitary manner. Resident Identifier #17. Facility census: 62. Findings included: a) Resident #17 A review of the Policy and Procedure titled: Preventive Maintenance: Routine Maintenance, dated with a revision date of 06/01/07, addressed requests for routine maintained on the physical plant, fixtures and equipment would require a work order. The policy further showed once work was completed, the maintenance supervisor or designee would write the action taken on the work order and completed work orders would be filed and maintained for one year. During a resident interview, on 04/25/22 at 10:57 AM, Resident #17 explained the toilet in the room had been broken for approximately a month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-23 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information posting accurately reflected the number of staff who actually worked. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 63. Findings include: On 01/22/24 at 12:06 PM, observation of the posted nurse staffing information (the information posted daily in the facility for visitors and residents) provided by the facility staff shows no Licensed Practical Nurse and or Registered Nurse ( LPN/RN) staff from 11pm-7am on the following nights: 12/22/23, 12/23/23, 12/25/23, 12/29/23. Further investigation of staff time cards showed at least one (1) RN/LPN from 11PM-7AM on 12/22/23, 12/23/23, 12/25/23, 12/29/23. On 01/22/24 12:20 PM, the Administrator confirmed the posted nurse staffing was incorrect.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,562 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,562 — penalty dated 2025-12-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGENCY HEALTH SERVICES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| REED, KRISTIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2025 |
| TOOTHMAN, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $439K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515102. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.