Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
940 Walnut Bottom Road, Carlisle, PA 17013 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (717) 249-0085 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $90,205 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.4% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.9% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.7% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.20 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 27% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.3%CMS range 36.6–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.0–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 28.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 75.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 6.0–15.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 135.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-06-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, observations, clinical record reviews, review of facility master menu diet guide sheets, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an altered texture diet, as prescribed by the physician, for six residents (Residents 2, 9, 12, 14, 60, and 101) observed. This failure placed 14 additional residents that had similar diet needs at a high risk for death and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (Residents 12, 13, 39, 50, 51, 62, 68, 73, 74, 78, 98, 108, 110, and 289). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Consistency Alterations and Therapeutic Menus dated May 1, 2023, read, in part, Purpose: To provide diets as ordered by the physician/advanced practice provider. Review of facility policy, titled Dysphagia Management dated May 1, 2023, read, in part, Residents who have swallowing difficulties/dysphagia will receive treatment interventions to promote adequate nutrition and hydration. Review of physician's orders revealed that Residents 2, 9, 12, 14, 60, and 101, were ordered the dysphagia advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility document review, policy review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct thorough fall investigations for one of six residents reviewed for falls (Resident 81) and failed to ensure that residents who expressed suicidal ideations were provided supervision and safety interventions were put into place to prevent serious bodily injury and/or death. This failure resulted in Resident 59 cutting himself and an immediate jeapordy situation. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Procedure: Suicide Precautions, last reviewed May 7, 2025, revealed the facility procedure included the following: 1. Evaluate patients with suicidal behavior or ideation. 2. Notify Physician/advanced practice provider (APP) of patients with suicidal behavior or ideation . 3. For Patients who exhibit suicidal behavior: 3.1 Obtain order for suicide precautions from the physician/APP. Implementation of suicide precautions should not be delayed while awaiting physician order. 3.2 Evaluate immediate safety needs. Remove any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, nurse aide competency review, clinical record review, review of select facility documentation, hospital discharge summary, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 111), which resulted in actual harm for Resident 111 as evidenced by a femur fracture.Review of facility policy, titled Falls Management last reviewed January 15, 2026, read, in part, Patients will be assessed for risk of falling as part of the nursing assessment process. Interventions to reduce risk and minimize injury will be implemented as appropriate. Implement and document patient-centered interventions according to individual risk factors in the patient's plan of care. Educate staff, patient, and/or patient representative(s) as appropriate to increase awareness of 'at risk' patients and to provide possible strategies to minimize risk for falls. Review of checklist, titled Turning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, which resulted in actual harm as evidence by weight loss for one of five Residents reviewed (Resident 1). Also, the facility failed to adequately monitor and document fluid restrictions for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 8), and failed to reweigh and notify the physician and dietician of significant weight loss for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 21).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Weights and Heights, last reviewed January 15, 2026, revealed the following Based on the patient's comprehensive assessment, the Center will ensure that all patients maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the patient's clinical condition demonstrates that it is not possible for the patient's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review select document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete routine and weekly skin checks for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). In addition, the facility failed to provide timely and comprehensive care and services after a change in condition including a respiratory assessment on a resident in respiratory distress, which resulted in harm as evidenced by hospital admission for respiratory failure that required intubation and abnormal labs for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the protective myelin sheath covering nerve fibers in the central nervous system, disrupting brain-body communication), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels, dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, hospital records, staff interviews, and review of the facility incident report, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided timely following a fall with fracture for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), which resulted in harm as evidenced by uncontrolled fracture-related pain and delayed corrective treatment. Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), congestive heart failure (CHF - weakness of the heart that leads to buildup of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Review of the facility incident report, revealed that Resident 1 experienced an unwitnessed fall between 4:45 and 5:00 AM on April 3, 2024. Further review of the report revealed, resident was found lying on the bathroom floor after staff had noted knocking noise coming from resident's bathroom. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from the potential for abuse by failing to perform licensure or registry verifications prior to hire for three of four personnel files reviewed (Employees 7, 8, and 9).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, with a last review date of November 14, 2025, revealed, in part, The Center will implement an abuse prohibition program through the following: Screening of potential hires. The Center will screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreating patients, including attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers, and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries. Review of personnel file for Employee 7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed that her date of hire was April 28, 2026. Further review of the personnel file revealed that the facility completed her license verification on July 13, 2026. Review of personnel file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 47, and 56).Findings include: Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition that includes symptoms of both schizophrenia and mood disorders) and bipolar disorder (unusual shifts in mood, ranging from extreme highs to lows). Review of Resident 7's physician orders revealed the following orders: risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg (milligrams) in the morning for bipolar disorder and bupropion HCL XR (antidepressant medication) 300 mg one time a day for depression, and mirtazapine (antidepressant medication) 7.5 mg at bedtime for antidepressant. Review of Resident 7's significant change minimum data sets (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, as well as resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 34, 85, and 130), and failed to ensure that care plan meetings were held, residents were invited, and that the required interdisciplinary team members attended care plan meetings for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 34, 106).Findings include: Facility policy, titled Person-Centered Care Plan, revised [DATE], read, in part, The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the patient and/or patient representative, as appropriate, will establish the expected goals and outcomes of care, the type, amount, frequency, and duration of care, and any other factors related to the effectiveness of the plan of care. 6. Care plans will be: 6.2 Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards during medication administration for four of six residents observed (Residents 1, 38, and 99) and failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for one of two resident's reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 2).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration Enteral Tubes, dated [DATE], revealed, in part, Crushed medications are not mixed together. The powder from each medication is mixed with water before administration. The standard of practice is that crushed medications should not be combined and given all at once via feeding tube. Each medication is given separately to avoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for two out of four residents reviewed for hearing (Residents 34 and 115).Findings include: Review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (long term degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that mainly affects the motor system) and cognitive communication deficit (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to communicate, which can cause difficulty with understanding or producing language and nonverbal communication skills such as gestures and facial expressions). During an interview with Resident 34 on July 20, 2026, at 11:25 AM, Resident 34 indicated that he was experiencing hearing loss and was awaiting hearing aids. Review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed an audiology consultation completed on May 28, 2026, after he had reported to nursing staff that he was experiencing hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility receive appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for four of four residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Residents 6, 7, 11, and 34).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG232 Restorative Nursing with a last revision date of July 17, 2026, revealed, in part, Restorative Nursing Program refers to nursing intervention that promotes the patient's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning. Restorative programs are coordinated by nursing or in collaboration with rehabilitation and are patient specific based on individual patient needs. A licensed nurse must supervise the activities in a restorative nursing program. 2. Develop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication and failed to appropriately monitor a resident receiving dialysis services for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG253 Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) - Communication and Documentation, with a last revision date of June 15, 2022, revealed, in part, Center staff will communicate with the certified dialysis facility regarding the ongoing assessment of the patient's condition by monitoring for complications before and after hemodialysis (HD) treatments received at a certified dialysis facility.1. Prior to a patient leaving the Center for HD, a licensed nurse will complete the top portion of the Hemodialysis Communication Record or the state required form and send with the patient to his/her HD facility visit.2. Following completion of the HD, the dialysis facility nurse should complete and return the form and return it or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, grievance review, resident council meeting minute review, facility audit review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three out of three nursing units (East, West, and Arcadia).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled NSG101 Call Lights with a last review and revised date of July 15, 2026, revealed, Staff will respond to call lights and communication devices promptly. During an interview with Resident 6 on July 20, 2026, at 10:49 AM, revealed the Resident had a concern for long call bell wait times. During an interview with Resident 18 on July 20, 2026, at 11:41 AM, revealed the Resident had a concern for long call bell wait times. During an interview with Resident 138 on July 20, 2026, at 12:36 PM, revealed the Resident had a concern for long call bell wait times and sometimes waits up to 60 minutes for assistance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free from a medication error rate of five percent or greater based on four medication errors out of 25 opportunities.Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration Enteral Tubes, dated January 2025, revealed, in part, Crushed medications are not mixed together. The powder from each medication is mixed with water before administration. The standard of practice is that crushed medications should not be combined and given all at once via feeding tube. Each medication is given separately to avoid interaction and clumping. The enteral tubing is flushed with water between each medication to avoid physical interaction of the medications. Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated January 2025, revealed, in part, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Observation of Employee 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse) on July 21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label medication vials, failed to dispose of medications upon a resident's discharge, and failed to monitor medication refrigerator temperatures to ensure refrigerated medications are stored at an acceptable temperature in two of two medication rooms observed (West Hall and Arcadia Unit); and failed to discard medications with illegible manufacturer expiration dates in one of three medication carts observed (East Wing D Hall).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration Enteral Tubes, dated January 2025, revealed, in part, 17. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. No medications are kept on top of the cart. Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, dated February 2026, revealed, in part, Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate infection control guidelines during medication administration for two of six residents observed (Residents 1 and 79), during wound care for one of one resident observed (Resident 1), and failed to implement appropriate infection control precautions per facility policy and physician orders for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 65).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated January 2025, revealed, in part, Hands are washed with soap and water and gloves applied before administration of .ophthalmic [eye] .enteral [feeding tube] medications. Hands are washed with soap and water again after administration and with any resident contact. Antimicrobial hand sanitizer may be used in place of soap and water as allowed per state nursing regulations and facility policy. Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration Enteral Tubes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure abuse training upon hire was completed for two of five employees reviewed (Employees 7 and 13).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, with a last review date of November 14, 2025, revealed, in part, The Center will implement an abuse prohibition program through the following: Training of employees (both new employees and ongoing training for all employees); Training and reporting obligations will be provided to all employees - through orientation, Code of Conduct training, and a minimum of annually - and will include: 4.1 the Abuse Prohibition policy and 4.8 dementia management and patient abuse prevention. Review of personnel file for Employee 7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed that her date of hire was April 28, 2026. Further review of the personnel file failed to reveal any documentation Employee 7 had completed any new employee orientation to include training on the facility abuse prohibition policy. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote an environment that enhances each resident's dignity by storing incontinent briefs in open view for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 30 and 34).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS206 Resident Rights Under Federal Law with a last revised date of February 1, 2023, and a last review date of June 12, 2025, indicated under the section titled Purpose that the facility was to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her self-esteem and self-worth. Also, in Section 1 Resident Rights revealed 1.1 The facility to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anxiety (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Facility policy, titled Medication Administration General Guideline, dated January 2025, read, in part, 15. Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the prescriber, the nursing care center's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications and state regulations. Facility policy, titled Medications: Self-administration, last revised October 15, 2024, read, in part, Patients who request to self-administer medications will be evaluated for safe and clinically appropriate capability based on the patient's functionality and health condition. If it is determined that the patient is able to self-administer: A physician/advanced practice provider (APP) order is required. Self-administration and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to privacy when receiving mail and packages for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 110).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled REC214 Patient/Resident Mail Delivery with a last revised and reviewed date of July 17, 2026, revealed Patients/Residents have the right to privacy in written communications, to send and promptly receive unopened mail and other letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the Center/Community, including those delivered through a means other than a postal service, and to have access to stationery, postage, and writing implements at their own expense. Procedure: 1. The Recreation Director or designee will: 1.2 Ensure that mail is delivered to the person unopened or postmarked within 24 hours, including Saturday. During an interview with Resident 4 at the resident council meeting on July 21, 2026, at 1:30 PM, she revealed that staff at the facility have opened her mail thinking it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including housekeeping and maintenance services, to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 34, and 67).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS200 Safe and Homelike Environment, with a last revised date of November 14, 2025, revealed, in part, The resident/patient has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Observation in Resident 6's room on July 20, 2026, at 10:40 AM; July 21, 2026, at 2:01 PM; and July 22, 2026, at 9:52 AM, revealed her wallpaper was torn and there were two large black scratch marks along the wall. During a staff interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: Review of Resident 6's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, initial encounter for a closed fracture, muscle weakness, and low back pain. Review of Resident 6's clinical record revealed she had a Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set- assessment tool utilized to identify residents' physical, mental and psychosocial needs) Assessment on March 10, 2026, and her next assessment was an Annual MDS Assessment completed on July 16, 2026. During an interview with Employee 12 (MDS Coordinator) on July 22, 2026, at 2:41 PM, she revealed Resident 6 should have had an assessment completed every 3 months. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on July 23, 2026, at 1:03 PM, she revealed she would expect MDS assessments to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings Include: Facility policy, titled OPS416 Person-Centered Care Plan, revision date September 15, 2025, read, in part, 1. Baseline Care Plan . 1.1.7. The admitting nurse, or supervising nurse on duty, shall gather information from the admission physical assessment, hospital transfer information, physician orders, and discussion with the patient and patient representative, if applicable.1.1. 7.2. Interventions shall be initiated that address the patient's current needs including: 1.1.7.2.1 Any health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury, such as elopement, fall, or pressure injury risk. 1.1.7.2.3 Any special needs such as for IV therapy, dialysis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, resident council interviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain personal hygiene for three out of five residents reviewed for ADL care (Residents 2, 3, and 28).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled NSG200 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with a last revised date of May 1, 2023, and a last review date of March 20, 2026, revealed, in part, Based on the comprehensive assessment of a patient and consistent with the patient's needs and choices, the Center must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a patient's activities of daily living (ADL) abilities are maintained or improved and do not diminish unless circumstances of the patient's clinical condition demonstrate that a change was unavoidable. ADLs include: Hygiene - bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. And 5. Documentation of ADL care is recorded in the medical record and is reflective of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments were provided as ordered for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 99 and 106); failed to ensure catheter orders were complete for one of two residents reviewed for catheters (Resident 1); and failed to ensure consultation appointments were scheduled in a timely manner to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 99). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage urine flow making it difficult or impossible to urinate) and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland causing trouble with urination). Review of Resident 1's comprehensive plan of care revealed that Resident 1 required an indwelling foley catheter 16 FR/10ml balloon due to neurogenic bladder. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving wound care was consistent with infection control standards of practice regarding aseptic field at the bedside and hand hygiene for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1); and failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent of a pressure ulcers for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 122).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Procedure: Wound Dressings, Aseptic last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed, in part, the following steps: 3. Prepare a clean, uncluttered, disinfected surface. 4. Create an aseptic field at bedside and place clean barrier on over-bed table. Place supplies on barrier. Review of the facility policy, titled IC203 Hand Hygiene last reviewed March 20, 2026, read, in part, If a task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident admitted with an indwelling foley catheter was accurately assessed for the removal of the catheter for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included severe protein-calorie malnutrition (a severe nutritional deficiency caused by inadequate or absorption of protein and energy-calories), cancer of the tongue, and obstructive (functional blockage of urine flow which causes damage to the kidneys) and reflux (urine flows backward into the kidneys) uropathy (any condition affecting that affects the urinary system). Observation of Resident 1 on July 21, 2026, at 9:00 AM, revealed the presence of an indwelling foley catheter (a flexible tube placed through the urethra to the bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed an order for a voiding trial to start June 30, 2026. Bladder scan every eight hours. May insert a straight catheter (a flexible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two of five residents reviewed for pain management (Residents 47 and 122).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Pain Management last revised March 24, 2025, read, in part, Staff will continually observe and monitor patients for comfort and presence of pain and will implement strategies in accordance with professional standards of practice, the patient-centered plan of care, and the patient's choices related to pain management. Purpose: To maintain the highest possible level of comfort for patients by providing a system to identify, assess, treat, and evaluate pain. An individualized, interdisciplinary, person-centered care plan will be developed and include: Non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. PRN (as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 112).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Monitoring Medication Regimen Review and Reporting with a last policy review date of March 10, 2026, revealed, 6. Resident-specific MRR recommendations and findings are documented and acted upon by the nursing care center and/or physician. 7. A record of the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations is made available in an easily retrievable format to nurses, physicians and the care planning team within 48 hours of MRR completion. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed that on January 11, 2026, a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) was performed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on nurse aide job description review, employee file reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure required in-service training for nurse aides sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides no less than 12 hours per year and/or include resident abuse prevention training for two of five nurse aide files reviewed for annual education requirements (Employees 10 and 11).Findings include: Review of facility document, titled Job Description: Nursing Assistant last revised November 23, 2020, read, in part, Must attend a minimum of 12 hours continuing education programs provided by the center in order to maintain certification. Review of Employee 10's annual education hours revealed she had only completed 2.38 hours of annual education and had not completed any abuse prevention training. Review of Employee 11's annual education hours revealed she had not completed any abuse prevention training. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on July 22, 2026, at 2:09 PM, she revealed she would expect nurse aides to complete at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to meet resident needs for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and progressive multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of the nerves, which disrupts communication between the brain and the body). Review of Resident 1's clinical record progress notes revealed a Care Plan Meeting note dated October 2, 2025, at 8:38 AM, which indicated that Resident 1 and her Representative were present for the meeting and that Resident 1 wished to be seen by the dentist for possible dentures. Review of Resident 1's dental consultation dated November 18, 2025, and electronically signed by the dentist on November 23, 2025, revealed recommendations for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included generalized anxiety disorder (excessive and ongoing worry that is difficult to control and interferes with day-to-day activities) and major depressive disorder (persistent low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities).Review of Resident 2's physician's orders revealed an order for Lorazepam three times a day for anxiety.Review of Resident 2's November 2025 medication administration record (MAR) revealed that on November 3, 2025, at 2:00 PM and 10:00 PM, Resident 2's Lorazepam was marked NN, indicating no/see nurse notes.Review of Resident 2's nursing progress notes for November 11, 2025, failed to reveal any notes relating to Resident 2's Lorazepam administration.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on December 15, 2025, at approximately 12:30 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility provided documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice of a resident's transfer to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for five of 11 residents reviewed for hospital transfers (Residents 27, 48, 79, 81, and 86). Findings include: Review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed he was transferred out of the facility and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and 19, 2025. Review of select facility documentation provided failed to reveal the representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of Resident 27's aforementioned hospitalizations. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on June 26, 2025, at 9:57 AM, revealed he would expect notification of hospitalizations to the representative of the Office of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 48, 79, 86 and 105). Findings include: Review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), and depression. Review of Resident 48's Medicare 5 Day MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) with the assessment reference date (last day of the assessment period) of October 15, 2024, revealed in Section N. Medications that she was coded as receiving an antianxiety medication and was coded as not receiving anticonvulsant. Review of Resident 48's October 2024 Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, as well as staff, resident representative, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the care plan was reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current status for four of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 48, 77, 94, and 102), and that residents were given the opportunity to participate in the care planning process and failed to ensure care plan meetings were being completed for five of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 25, 26, 47, 59, and 79). Findings Include: Facility policy, titled OPS416 Person-Centered Care Plan, last reviewed May 7, 2025, read in part, 7. Care plans will be: 7.2 Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals. 8. Care Plan Meetings: 9. The Center has the responsibility to assist patients to participate by: 9.1 Extending invitations to patient and HCDM sent in advance; 9.3 Facilitating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for five of 28 residents (Residents 13, 27, 38, 79, and 102). Findings include: Review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow to your brain) and scoliosis (a condition where the spine curves sideways). Review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed the Resident had a fall on March 27, 2025, at 12:00 PM, where staff were alerted that Resident 13 was seen to be sitting on the floor and trashcan across from toilet. Description of immediate action taken revealed that the medical director provided a new order for urine analysis with culture and sensitivity (UA/C&S) to rule out urinary tract infection (UTI) due to Resident falling three times in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed ensure the resident received care, consistent with professional standards, to treat and prevent pressure ulcers for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 77 and 106). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG236, Revised October 15, 2024, revealed in 6.10. Determine the need for heel off-loading, 6.13 Implement special wound care treatments/techniques, as indicated and ordered, and step 11. Review care plan and revise as indicated. Review of Resident 77's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of left ankle and foot (infectious inflammation of bone marrow) and diabetes (a disease that effects how the body utilizes and regulates blood sugar). Observation of Resident 77 on June 23, 2025, at 1:25 PM, revealed him sitting in his wheelchair in his room and two pressure off-loading boots were sitting beside his bed. Interview with Resident 77 at that time revealed that staff occasionally put the pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure employee performance reviews were completed yearly (at least every 12 months) for five of five employees reviewed (Employees 9, 12, 13, 14, and 15). Findings include: On June 25, 2025, at approximately 9:45 AM, a request for the most recent employee performance reviews for Employees 9, 12, 13, 14, and 15 was made to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). During a staff interview on June 26, 2025, at approximately 12:20 PM, the NHA revealed the facility did not have any record that an employee review was conducted within the past year for Employees 9, 12, 13, 14 and 15. During the staff interview, the NHA revealed it was the facility's expectation that employee performance reviews are completed yearly. 28 Pa code 201.18(b)(3)Management 28 Pa code 201.19(2) Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired medications in one of three medication carts observed (B Hall) and in one of two medication rooms observed (West Wing). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medication, with a last review date of May 7, 2025, revealed Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer or provider pharmacy recommendations to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. Review of facility policy, appendix Medications with Shortened Expiration Dates, dated 2007, revealed that Novolog insulin should be discarded 28 days after opening and that the beyond use date after initially opening multi-dose injectable vials is 28 days unless otherwise specified by the manufacturer. Observation of the B Hall medication cart on June 24, 2025, at 9:16 AM, revealed a Novolog insulin vial with an open date of May 24, 2025. Observation of the [NAME] Wing medication room on June 24, 2025, at 9:27 AM, revealed two open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of manufacturer guidelines, observation, review of select facility temperature logs, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of manufacturer guidelines for Cle-Series Dishwashers, dated November 2012, revealed that the minimum temperatures using high-temperature sanitizing for single-tank models, such as CL44e, require a minimum wash temperature of 160 degrees F (Fahrenheit- unit of measure). Observation of the dish machine in the main kitchen on June 23, 2025, at 9:41 AM, revealed the temperature gauge on the machine read 152 degrees F for the wash temperature while in use. During an interview with Employee 1 (Certified Dietary Manager) on June 24, 2025, at 12:37 PM, he revealed the model of the dish machine was CL44e and provided the manufacturer guidelines for review. He further revealed he and the staff were under the impression that the dish machine required a minimum wash temperature of 150 degrees F.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 287); and failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan that includes, but is not limited to: (i) The initial goals of the resident. (ii) A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions. (iii) Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility. (iv) Any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary for one of one resident's reviewed (Resident 287). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS416 Person-Centered Care Plan, with a last review date pf May 7, 2025, revealed, in part, 1. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services regarding hygiene and bathing for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG200 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), with a last review date of May 7, 2025, revealed, in part, Based on the comprehensive assessment of a patient and consistent with the patient's needs and choices, the Center must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a patient's activities of daily living (ADL) abilities are maintained . 4.2 A patient who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary level of ADL assistance to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 5. Documentation of ADL care is recorded in the medical record and is reflective of the care provided by nursing staff. ADL care will be documented in real time, as close to the time that care was provided and information obtained as possible. ADL care is documented every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident receives proper treatment and services to maintain hearing abilities for one of three residents reviewed for vision and hearing (Resident 42). Findings include: Review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included stage 3 chronic kidney disease (when your kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood) and hypothyroidism (when your thyroid gland doesn't make and release enough hormone into your bloodstream). During an interview conducted with Resident 42 on June 23, 2025, at 9:52 AM, revealed that she was having difficulty hearing, and has requested to see a doctor as she has hearing aids but has lost her ability to hear adequately. Review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed a medical practitioner note written on April 11, 2025, at 1:45 PM, that read, in part, Resident 42 was seen for an acute visit for hearing loss, and that they will consult audiology for evaluation. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, policy review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing care for range of motion exercises for two of four residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Residents 5 and 88). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing last revised August 7, 2023, read, in part, Centers may provide restorative nursing programs for patients who: Will benefit from restorative programs in conjunction with formalized rehabilitation therapy. Restorative programs are coordinated by nursing or in collaboration with rehabilitation and are patient specific based on individual patient needs. A licensed nurse must supervise the activities in a restorative nursing program. Document: Daily on Restorative Nursing Record in ADL Point of Care. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that damage blood vessels in the brain, leading to reduced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to manage or prevent pain consistent with professional standards of practice and the residents' goals and preferences for three of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 27, and 287). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG 227 Pain Management, with a last review date of May 7, 2025, read, in part, Staff will continually observe and monitor patients for comfort and presence of pain and will implement strategies in accordance with professional standards of practice, the patient-centered plan of care, and the patient's choices related to pain management. Purpose is to design a plan of care to achieve an optimal balance between pain relief and preservation of function, in accordance with patient directed goals and preferences. 7. Center staff will report any observation or communication of pain to the nurse responsible for that patient. 9. Patients receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of grievances, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for one out of three nursing units (West wing). Findings Include: During the initial pool process on June 23, 2025, and June 24, 2025, there were 10 residents who expressed concern to the survey team about call bell response time and/or staffing. Review of facility grievances from April, May, and June of 2025 revealed three grievances related to extended wait time for call bells to be answered. Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes for April, May, and June of 2025 revealed that residents present at the meetings complained about extended call bell wait times in April and May of 2025. During an observation on June 23, 2025, at 11:00 AM, in [NAME] wing, B-hall, there were call lights activated for rooms [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to meet resident need for one of one resident reviewed for dental (Resident 14). Findings include: Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive, persistent, and disproportionate fear or worry) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). During an interview with Resident 14 on June 25, 2025, on 12:18 PM, revealed she had new dentures that do not fit her mouth, which results in her not being able to eat properly. Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed she was last seen by the facility's dentist on August 16, 2024, with treatment notes that included the Resident is interested in having new dentures fabricated, and that a preauthorization was submitted and will follow up with the Resident following denture approval. Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed a preauthorization for the Resident's dental claim was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of medication package insert, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the preparation and administration of medications to four of four residents observed (Residents 19, 52, 87, and 109). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration 7.5 Orals, with a last review date of May 7, 2025, revealed in part avoid touching any of the medication unless wearing gloves. Review of the instruction leaflet for Lantus-Solostar Insulin Pen, with a last revised date of February 23, 2016, revealed the following, in part, Always use a new sterile needle for each injection. A. Wipe the rubber seal with alcohol. B. Remove the protective seal from a new needle. C. Line up the needle with the pen and keep it straight as you attach it (screw or push on, depending on the needle type). Review of facility policy, titled Subcutaneous Insulin, with a last review date of May 7, 2025, failed to reveal any direction to cleanse the rubber…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that enhances each resident's dignity for four of four Residents reviewed (Residents 5, 25, 40, and 54). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS200 Accommodation of Needs, with a last review date of April 24, 2024, revealed, in part, that the Center's physical environment and staff behaviors should be directed toward assisting the patient in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and wellbeing to the extent possible in accordance with the patient's own needs and preferences. Review of facility policy, titled OPS206 Resident Rights Under Federal Law, with a last review date of April 24, 2024, indicated under the section titled Purpose, that the facility was to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her self-esteem and self-worth. Also, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer to residents and/or resident representatives, or to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for eight of 11 residents reviewed for hospital transfers (Residents 5, 7, 22, 25, 27, 39, 54, and 103). Findings include: Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes which causes memory loss in older adults), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty in thinking and how someone uses language), and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech). Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed that the Resident was transferred to the hospital on April 19, 2024, and returned to the facility on April 24, 2024. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on July 18, 2024, at 10:40 AM, the NHA confirmed that the facility was unable to provide documentation that Resident 5's responsible party or the Pennsylvania State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents and/or resident representatives with the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer for seven of 11 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 5, 7, 25, 27, 39, 54, and 103). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Bed Hold Notice - Deliver Upon Transfer, revised August 5, 2022, revealed that staff are to complete the Bed Hold Notice Form, deliver it to the resident or representative (if there is one), and note delivery of the notice in the electronic health record. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes, which causes memory loss in older adults), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty in thinking and how someone uses language), and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech). Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed that the Resident was transferred to the hospital on April 19, 2024, and returned to the facility on April 24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for six of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 25, 38, 39, 123, and 124). Findings include: Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs), chronic kidney disease (a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Interview with Resident 7 on July 15, 2024, at 12:30 PM, revealed he lost use of his leg when he was in the hospital, and he has been in therapy since he returned. Review of select documentation, titled Physical Therapy Evaluation, with a start of care date of May 21, 2024, revealed under section Range of Motion: does patient have limitation in lower extremity range of motion that interfered with daily function or placed resident at risk of injury in the last 7 days, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 27 residents reviewed (Resident's 5, 40, 41, and 113). Finding include: Review of facility policy, titled SNF Clinical System Process - Care Plan, last reviewed April 24, 2024, read, in part, Updating & Revising the Care Plan: Including Resolving and Un-resolving the Focus, Goals, and Interventions - Care Plans will be updated and revised as needed. When and How Often: Based on ongoing assessment and evaluation of Patients needs and according to OBRA Requirements, Within 7 days of admission, at MDS interval, Quarterly review, with change in condition as it occurs. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes which causes memory loss in older adults) and the presence of a gastrostomy tube (a surgically placed device used to give direct access to one's stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of four residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Resident 115). Findings include: Review of Resident 115's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included encounter for orthopedic aftercare (aftercare following joint replacement surgery), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy (a group of inherited disorders that affect the peripheral nervous system), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in things). Interview with Resident 115 on July 15, 2024, at 10:12 AM, revealed he had previously received therapy services, but he doesn't get out of bed much since then. Review of select documentation, titled Physical Therapy Discharge Summary, signed by Employee 5 (Physical Therapist) on March 22, 2024, revealed Discharge reason, maximum potential achieved, refer to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice for three of five residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 41, 54, and 84). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Respiratory Equipment/Supply Cleaning/Disinfecting, revised July 15, 2021, revealed, Oxygen Concentrators: Rinse and dry the external filter weekly and PRN [as-needed] when visibly dusty and change oxygen delivery devices-every seven days and as needed for soiling. Review of Resident 41's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included respiratory failure with hypercapnia (when the lungs have difficulty removing carbon dioxide from the blood) and morbid (severe) obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (diminished respiratory drive related to obesity). Observations made on July 16, 2024, at 9:43 AM, and July 17, 2024, at 1:09 PM, revealed Resident 41 receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal canula. No date was noted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were appropriately acted upon for four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 7, 25, 54, and 56), and one of one resident reviewed for insulin use (Resident 51). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Psychotropic Medication Use, Last revised October 24, 2022, revealed section two of Procedure, stated, Facility should comply with the Psychopharmacologic Dosage Guidelines created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ('CMS'), the State Operations Manual, and all other Applicable Law relating to the use of psychopharmacologic medications including gradual dose reductions. Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), last revised June 1, 2024, read, in part, Facility should alert the medical director where MRRs are not addressed by the attending physician in a timely manner. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident medication regimen was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 25 and 56). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Psychotropic Medication Use, last revised October 24, 2022, revealed section 10 of Procedure, stated, All medication used to treat behaviors must have a clinical indication and be used in the lowest possible dose to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. All medications used to treat behaviors should be monitored for .efficacy . Review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident 25's current physician orders revealed that the Resident was receiving the following psychotropic medications: belsomra (medication used to treat difficulty falling and staying asleep) oral tablet 10 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia, dated March 2, 2024;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to place opened dates on medications in two of three medication carts observed (100 Hall and 200 Hall). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled 5.3 Storage and Expiration Dating of Medication, Biologicals, last reviewed April 24, 2024, read, in part, This Policy 5.3 sets forth the procedures relating to the storage and expiration dates of medication, biologicals, syringes, and needles. Procedure 5. Once any medication or biological package is opened, facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dated for opened medication. Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container (vial, bottle, inhaler) when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened. Observation of the 200 hall medication cart on July 17, 2024, at 9:01 AM, revealed open stock bottles of the following medications with no open date: stool softener 100 mg, chewable aspirin 81 mg, delayed release aspirin 81 mg, vitamin D3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and three of three nourishment areas Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Refrigerated/Frozen Storage, dated May 1, 2023, read, in part, Food stored under refrigeration/freezer storage is maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. Purpose: to prevent damage, spoilage, and contamination of products. All foods are labeled with the name of product and the date received and 'use by' date one opened. Manufacturer 'use by' dates are used until opened. Food and Nutrition Services employees observe and record equipment temperatures daily according to the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Standards. Review of facility policy, titled Food and Nutrition Services 'use by' dating guidelines, dated July 10, 2023, read, in part, Item: produce and thickened liquids, date with 'use by' date seven days after opening. Frozen food stored in the freezer, 'use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal and influenza immunizations for four of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 17, 25, 47, and 107). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled IC600 Influenza Immunization Program, revised September 1, 2023, revealed, Obtain consent for influenza vaccination; patient immunization consent is documented in PointClickCare (PCC) [electronic health record] --Patient Informed Consent or Declination; document influenza vaccination refusals. If patient/representative or employee refuses influenza immunization, provide information and counseling regarding the benefit of immunization. If immunization refused, document patient's and/or representative's refusal of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that education was provided to Residents on the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine for three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 17, 25, and 107). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled IC604 COVID-19 Vaccination, revised February 7, 2024, revealed, Based on the patient's COVID-19 vaccination history, offer the vaccination following the manufacturer's recommended schedule. Obtain consent. In situations where COVID-19 vaccination requires multiple doses, the patient/patient representative/employee/visiting HCP [Healthcare Provider] is provided with current information regarding those additional doses, including any changes in the benefits or risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine before requesting consent for administration of any additional doses. If a patient/patient representative refuses vaccination, document declination on the Immunization Record. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment on one of three units observed (East Lounge). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS200 Accommodation of Needs, with a review date of April 24, 2024, revealed, in part, that the Center's physical environment and staff behaviors should be directed toward assisting the patient in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and wellbeing to the extent possible in accordance with the patient's own needs and preferences. Observation of East Lounge on July 15, 2024, at 10:52 AM, revealed that approximately 20 empty wheelchairs/specialty chairs used for resident mobility were stored. During this observation, Resident 26 was observed to ambulate into the lounge using their walker. Resident 26 stepped away from their walker to move an empty wheelchair that was pushed up against a table displaying a jigsaw puzzle. After moving the wheelchair, Resident 26 retrieved their walker and proceeded to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 57). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, with a last revision date of October 24, 2022, and last review date of April 24, 2024, revealed, in part, under section titled External Abuse Reporting Requirements that reporting requirements as based on real (clock) time, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 378). Findings include: Review of Resident 378's clinical record revealed Resident 378 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (kidneys can no longer filter waste and excess fluids) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood). During an interview on July 16, 2024 at 11:00 AM, with Resident 378, it was revealed that Resident 378 had a midline catheter and received dialysis treatment three times a week. Review of Resident 378's physician orders failed to document an order for hemodialysis or care needs surrounding hemodialysis. Review of Resident 378's baseline care plan failed to document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident comprehensive plan of care accurately reflected the status of two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 56 and 83). Findings include: Review of Resident 56's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive, irreversible degenerative brain disease that results in decreased contact with reality and decreased ability to perform activities of daily living) and type two diabetes mellitus (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood stream into the cells for nourishment). Review of Resident 56's physician orders revealed that on January 26, 2024, revealed Resident 56 was started on Rexulti (an atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health disorders) 0.5 milligrams (mg - metric unit of measurement). On February 8, 2024, Resident 56's order for Rexulti was discontinued and Resident 56 was started on risperidone (antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health disorders)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled 5.3 Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, with a last revision date of August 7, 2023, and last review date of April 24, 2024, revealed 13. Bedside Medication Storage: 13.1 Facility should not administer/provide bedside medications or biologicals without a Physician/Prescriber order and approval by the Interdisciplinary Care Team and Facility administration; and 13.2 Facility should store bedside medications or biologicals in a locked compartment within the resident's room. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes which causes memory loss in older adults), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty in thinking and how someone uses language), and muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 113 and 378). Findings Include: Review of Resident 113's clinical records revealed diagnoses that included acute renal failure (ARF - a sudden and often reversible decrease in kidney function), short bowel syndrome (condition that occurs when the small is damaged preventing absorption of nutrients from food), and protein-calorie malnutrition (nutritional state where the body doesn't get enough protein, calories, or other nutrients causing changes in body composition and function). Review of Resident 113's physician orders revealed an order for a left double lumen PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter): inserted June 21, 2024 at 2:58 PM. Further review of Resident 113's physician orders revealed no orders for monitoring Resident 113's PICC line site and PICC line site dressing changes. Review of Resident 113's physician progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and complications related to the use of a foley catheter (small, flexible tube that can be inserted through the urethra and into the bladder, allowing urine to drain) for two of two residents reviewed for catheter use (Residents 12 and 40). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheter: Indwelling Urinary - Care Of, revised February 1, 2023, revealed, Secure the catheter tubing to keep the drainage bag below the level of the resident's bladder and off the floor. Review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of bladder (bladder cancer) and retention of urine. Observations on July 15, 2024, at 10:14 AM and at 10:49 AM, revealed Resident 12 had a urinary catheter, and the catheter drainage bag was laying on the floor next to her bed, doubled over onto itself. When informed of the concern at 10:52 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor hydration status precisely and effectively for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Nutrition/Hydration Care and Services, last revised February 1, 2023, read, in part, Practice Standards: Maintain fluid and hydration balance. When a physician orders a fluid restriction due to specific clinical condition, dietary will calculate the amount of fluids to be provided on the meal trays, nursing will calculate the remaining amounts of fluids allotted for each shift. Inform the patient and/or patient representative of fluid restriction. Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF - a long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs), chronic kidney disease (CKD - a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function), and hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy and documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods and beverages that are palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one meal observed on the Arcadia unit. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Food Handling dated May 1, 2023, indicated 24. During transportation of food from the kitchen to the dining rooms, resident rooms, or other dining locations, care is taken to keep hot food hot and cold food cold and protected from contamination. Review of HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) Food Flow Chart, undated, provided by the facility indicated that ground meats and portioned meats should be maintained at a temperature of 145 degrees Fahrenheit or above. Observation on May 6, 2024, at 12:47 PM, revealed that two food delivery carts arrived on the Arcadia unit. A test tray was completed on May 6, 2024, at 1:05 PM on the Arcadia Unit from cart 2. Test tray temperatures were taken by Employee 1 (Dietary Manager) on the tray. Findings were as follows:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$90,205 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $50,150 — penalty dated 2026-03-20
- $31,231 — penalty dated 2025-06-26
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-04-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/14/2022 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2020 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/14/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/14/2022 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| KIRSCHNER, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MURRAY, LAUREN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| ANJUM, RASHID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/14/2025 |
| MITRZYK, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/14/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 395746. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.