Meridian Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 199 beds and averages 167.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.03 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews with staff, resident, and the Medical Director, the facility failed to ensure safe securement per manufacturer recommendations of a resident during a van transport. On 2/21/25, Resident #8 was being transferred to dialysis in the facility's transportation van. When Transportation Driver #1 made a left turn, Resident #8 and the wheelchair she was seated in tipped over onto the floor of the van. The Transportation Driver called 911. Resident #8 complained of pain to the right side of her neck and face and was transported to the hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Resident #8 was receiving a blood thinner which increased her risk of bleeding. While at the hospital, Resident #8 was found to not have sustained any injuries but was admitted for one day to receive her missed dialysis treatment before returning to the facility. This practice had a high likelihood of causing a serious adverse outcome, including death or serious injury. This deficient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility staff failed to disinfect a shared blood glucose meter (glucometer) between residents in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer of the disinfectant wipes used for 1 of 2 residents whose blood glucose levels were checked (Residents #135). This occurred while there was at least one resident with a known bloodborne pathogen in the facility. Shared glucometers can be contaminated with blood and must be cleaned and disinfected after each use with an approved product and procedure. Failure to use an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved disinfectant in accordance with the manufacturer potentially exposes residents to the spread of blood borne infections. Care must also be taken by personnel handling glucometers to protect the glucometers against cross-contamination via contact with other surfaces. Immediate Jeopardy began on 8/14/25 when Nurse #1 was observed performing blood glucose checks on residents using a shared glucometer without disinfecting per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff, resident, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to transfer a resident safely from a shower to the resident's room. On 06/12/24 Resident #1 was being pushed in a shower chair down the hall by Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 and the resident fell forward out of the chair hitting the floor. The fall resulted in the resident being sent out to the hospital for complaints of severe pain. Resident #1 indicated from a 1-10 (10 being the most pain) her pain level was an 11 in her lower extremities and wanted to be sent out to the hospital immediately. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with a left tibial plateau fracture (top part of the shin bone), right foot great toe fracture, and an acute displaced (bones are out of alignment) spiral (broken by twisting force) fracture of the right femur (thigh bone) requiring surgical repair. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for providing supervision to prevent accidents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and Nurse Practitioner interview, the facility failed to provide assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #110) reviewed for falls. Resident #110 fell out of bed, hit her head on the floor, yelled, and screamed of pain, sustaining a 36 centimeters [cm] full thickness curvilinear (crescent) wound to the lateral aspect of the right lower leg and the right first toenail was almost completely avulsed (torn off) with only attachments on the lateral proximal (from the side to the center) nail. Findings included: Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypertension (HTN). Resident #110's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and with no behaviors. The quarterly assessment further indicated Resident #110 required extensive assistance of two persons…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date food items stored for use in the reach-in refrigerator for 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerator and failed to use gloves when handling an unpeeled cucumber for 1 of 5 kitchen staff observed. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents.Findings included:A.On 6/7/26 at 9:15 am the initial kitchen observation was completed with kitchen staff #1. The reach-in refrigerator had the following food items that were not in the original manufacturer's packaging and were not dated: Six applesauce cups no longer in the original package, One yellow pudding consistency food item in a large metal bowl with plastic wrap which was lying in the food and no longer covering. The food item appeared to be runny with water pooling on the edges, and Fourteen poured cups of thickened liquid were in plastic cups. On 6/7/26 at 10:45 am an interview was completed with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated that all food items required an expired by date when placed in alternate packaging. B.On 6/9/26 at 12:32 pm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property when a staff member (Nurse Aide #8) accepted a meal purchased by Resident #144 through an online food delivery service and failed to reimburse Resident #144 for the cost of the meal. The deficient practice was for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for misappropriate of resident property (Resident #144).Findings Included:Resident #144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #144's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment indicated Resident #144 was cognitively intact.An initial allegation report dated 5/2/26 completed by the Administrator showed that Resident #144 made the Registered Nurse (RN) Weekend Supervisor aware on 5/2/26 that on 5/1/26, Nurse Aide #8 took his online food delivery service order and did not deliver it to him.A review of the 5-day investigation report dated 5/8/26 completed by the Administrator revealed that on 5/5/26 the Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 of 3 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #68). The findings included:Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential hypertension, communication deficit, unspecified visual loss, and chronic pain syndrome.A care plan dated 6/5/2026 indicated Resident #68 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with a goal that read Resident #68 would maintain his current level of function. The care plan revealed the resident was dependent on the assistance of one staff with personal hygiene.The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 5/22/2026 documented Resident #68 as cognitively intact, without refusal of care behavior, and dependent on others for personal hygiene.Resident #68 was observed on 6/7/2026 at 10:39 AM. The free edge of Resident #68's fingernails on both hands were either jagged or broken,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident, resident representative, staff, Neurosurgery Staff Nurse, Wound Care Physician, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to follow up with the neurosurgeon's office regarding a follow up appointment to address resident's staples. The deficient practice affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care (Resident #1).The findings included:A review of Resident #1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], it was noted that the resident underwent a C4-T2 (4th cervical vertebra through 2nd thoracic vertebra) posterior fusion on 4/30/26. It was also noted that there were no follow-up visits scheduled for Neurosurgery or guidance provided regarding the 15 staples present in her surgical incision.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a non-displaced cervical fracture C6 and C7 (cervical spine in neck) acute 3-column fracture of C6 (a severe and unstable cervical spine injury in which all three structural columns of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide personal care in a safe manner when Resident # 44 was left unattended in shower room with the side rails on shower stretcher left in down position. Resident #44 rolled off the right side of shower stretcher and required transfer to the hospital for medical evaluation. This was for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #44).Findings included: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' diagnoses included Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following Cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, and contractures of left wrist and hand. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 was cognitively intact and had range of motion impairment on one side of his upper and lower extremities. The MDS also indicated Resident #44 was dependent rolling left and right.Resident #44's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure a bottle of prescription eye drops that was left unattended on top of the second-floor medication cart for 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (second floor medication cart).The findings included:A continuous observation was conducted on 6/9/26 from 9:15 AM to 9:18 AM. During that time, the second-floor medication cart parked outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], contained a bottle of prescription eye drops (timolol, used to reduce high pressure in the eye) that were sitting on top of the cart. The cart was unattended and an observation of the hallway revealed the nurse for this cart (Nurse #7) was not present in the hallway. Also, at 9:15 AM Unit Manager #1 walked past the medication cart but did not acknowledge or remove the prescription eye drops. There were 2 residents observed sitting in the hallway in the vicinity of the medication cart during the observation. On 6/9/26 at 9:19 AM Nurse #7 returned to the medication cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable in taste and temperature. The deficient practice affected 3 of 3 residents reviewed for food (Resident #14, #83, and #139). Findings included:1a. On 6/7/26 at 9:10 am during the initial kitchen observation, there were two carts of breakfast trays returned to the kitchen for washing. Several of the plates had what appeared to be French toast that was dark brown with shriveled edges that was not eaten or had bites taken. The toast felt hard when touched.On 6/7/26 at 9:12 am kitchen staff #1 was interviewed. She stated the carts were breakfast trays returned from this morning. She had no comment regarding the French toast that was not eaten and returned on the tray nor its consistency. On 6/7/26 at 9:15 am the cook was interviewed. The cook stated she prepared the breakfast which included French toast and had no comment about the toast. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #14's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, residents, and the dialysis center Nurse Manager, the facility failed to provide transportation back to the facility after hemodialysis was completed which caused the residents to wait up to 2 hours to return. The residents requested they be transported back to the facility and not wait, which made one resident late for dinner. This deficient practice affected 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents #22 and #8). The findings included:1a.Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD) dependent on hemodialysis. Resident #22's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident had intact cognition. The care plan for Resident #22 dated 7/14/25 documented he had impaired renal function and was at risk for complications of hemodialysis. The interventions were hemodialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and to watch for complications. On 08/12/25 at 9:41 am Resident #22 was interviewed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0646 — pattern
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the North Carolina Medicaid Uniform Screening Tool (NC MUST), that is the State Mental Health or Intellectual Disability Authority, when a significant change in condition was identified for a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability (Resident #39) and failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) re-evaluation for PASRR Level II residents identified to have a significant change in his or her physical or mental status (Resident #11 and Resident # 179). This deficient practice affected 3 of 3 residents reviewed who had a significant change in condition. The findings included: 1.Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His cumulative diagnoses included a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. The resident's electronic medical record (EMR) included information from the North Carolina Medicaid Uniform Screening Tool (NC MUST). This record revealed Resident #39 was evaluated and found to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 kitchen icemakers was free from black and gray debris and wet mixing bowls were not stacked together before they were fully dry. This had the potential to affect all residents who received ice and/or food that came into contact with the mixing bowls. An observation completed on 08/11/25 at 9:38 AM revealed 1 of the facility's 2 icemakers in the kitchen had black and gray debris running down the ice divider inside of the ice maker and then along the top ridge of the icemaker where the door opened and closed. The black and gray debris was wet in nature and appeared to be running down the divider and potentially dripping onto the ice. Additional observations at this time revealed 3 large metal mixing bowls that had recently been washed, nested together on a storage shelf. When pulled apart visible liquid drained from each of the bowls and onto the floor.An interview with the Dietary Manager on 08/11/25 at 9:46 AM revealed the ice maker was scheduled to be cleaned monthly by the maintenance department. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$88,566 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $54,964 — penalty dated 2025-08-20
• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
• $4,766 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-05-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC