Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 77.9 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to adhere to its policies and procedures for infection control and Legionella prevention. The facility failed to follow the established water management plan by neglecting remediation or testing of the water system after a confirmed resident case of Legionella. Furthermore, the facility failed to document the results of control measures as required by the Water Management Plan. Additionally, the facility allowed the use of a humidifier in a resident's room, which creates a potential risk for the spread and growth of Legionella. Collectively, these failures in following policies, procedures, and the Water Management Plan expose the facility's census of 80 residents to the potential spread and growth of Legionella.Findings include:Review on 10/6/25 of Resident #1's medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted and resided at the facility since November 2024. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on 9/30/25 for acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 18 residents. (Resident identifiers are #6 and #8.) Findings include:Resident #6 Observation on 8/12/25 at approximately 10:08 a.m in Resident # 6's room revealed that there were 2 prescription lotions, Ammonium Lactate External Lotion 12% and Anti-Itch External Lotion 0.5-5%, located on the Resident's windowsill. Interview on 8/12/25 at approximately 10:08 a.m with Resident #6 revealed that Resident #6 would have the above mentioned lotion applied by nursing staff and that he/she would also apply the lotion as needed. Observation on 8/12/25 at approximately 10:18 a.m. of Resident #6's room revealed that the prescription lotions remained at the resident's bedside on a bedside table. Observation on 8/13/25 at approximately 1:50 p.m. with Staff A (Licensed Vocational Nurse) revealed that the 2 prescription lotions remained in the resident's room, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to hold routine interdisciplinary care plan meetings for 2 of 18 residents and failed to develop and update comprehensive care plans for 1 of 18 reviewed in a final sample of 18 residents. (Resident identifiers are #13, #24 and #47.)Findings include:Resident #13Interview on 8/13/25 at approximately 8:41 a.m. with Resident #13 revealed that they have had meetings about his/her care, but not for several months. Resident #13 would like to attend his/her care planning meetings.Review on 8/13/25 of Resident #13's medical record revealed that the last documented care plan meeting was 9/4/24.Interview on 8/13/25 at approximately 2:08 p.m. with Staff F (Director of Social Services) confirmed the above findings. Resident #24Interview on 8/12/25 at approximately 2:05 p.m. with Resident #24's DPOA (Durable Power of Attorney) revealed that he/she was invited to a care plan meeting twice last year. The last meeting he/she recalled attending was in December of 2024. DPOA stated that he/she attended all meetings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow menu preferences, allergies, and intolerances for 1 resident of 1 resident reviewed for food concerns and 1 resident of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition in a final sample of 18 residents. (Resident Identifiers are #17 and #73.)Findings include:Resident #17Observation on 8/12/25 at approximately 12:58 p.m. of Resident #17 in the dining room, during lunch, revealed Resident #17's meal ticket to read ADD FINGER FOODS TO MEALS. Further observation revealed no finger food items provided and Resident #17 was attempting to pick up the ground chicken and gravy with his/her fingers. Resident #17 attempted to drink their pudding from the dish.Observation on 8/13/25 at approximately 8:00 a.m. in the dining room, during breakfast, revealed Resident #17 attempting to eat a bowl of milk-soaked cereal with his /her fingers. Further observation revealed a scoop of scrambled eggs that were untouched on Resident #17's plate. There was no finger food items on Resident #17's plate.Review on 8/13/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper storage of washed linens and ensure proper processing of linens to reduce risk of accidental contamination for 1 of 1 laundry observed. Findings include: Observation on 8/14/25 between 10:09 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. in the laundry room with Staff H (Infection Preventionist) and Staff P (Director of Housekeeping) revealed a small residential washing machine was running on normal mode and cold water setting. Interview on 8/14/25 between 10:09 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. with Staff P revealed the residential washing machine had been used for almost a year for resident's clothes, kitchen rags, bed sheets, and other linens. They use a household detergent bought from a local store on all linens and added bleach for white linens. The washing machine was not hooked up to the hot water and ran loads with cold water. Staff P was unable to provide the facility's policy for using the residential washing machine, in regards to the manufacturer's' instructions, temperature, detergent or laundry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their smoking policy for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking in a final sample of 18 residents. (Resident identifier is #1.)Findings include: Review on 8/14/25 of the facility's smoking policy with a review date of 2/24/25, revealed .Smoking supplies (including, but not limited to, tobacco, matches, lighters, lighter fluid, batteries, refill cartridges, etc. [etcetera]) will be labeled with the patient's name, room number, and bed number, maintained by staff, and stored in a suitable cabinet kept at the nursing station .Interview on 8/12/25 at 10:44 a.m. with Resident #1 revealed that Resident #1 was an independent smoker and he/she kept his/her cigarettes and lighter in their room in a black bag. Interview on 8/13/25 at 2:36 p.m. with Staff L (Registered Nurse) confirmed that Resident #1 was an independent smoker and that Resident #1 kept his/her cigarettes and lighter in their room. Observation on 8/14/25 at 1:10 p.m. in Resident #1's room revealed that Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain written authorization of a resident to act as a fiduciary of the resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the personal funds of the resident deposited with the facility for 3 of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident identifiers are #1, #2, and #3.)Findings include:Resident #1Review on 7/7/25 of Resident #1's Resident Statement Landscape for January 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 revealed that Resident #1's social security benefit was direct deposited into their resident fund on 1/3/25, 2/3/25, 3/3/25, 4/3/25, 5/2/25, and 6/3/25. The following amounts of money were transferred directly to the facility with description Care Cost Auto WDL: $3058.04 on 1/9/25; $40.00 on 1/21/25; $1399.00 on 2/3/25; $1399.00 on 3/3/25; $1399 on 4/3/25; $1399.00 on 5/2/25; and $949.00 on 6/3/25.Review on 7/7/25 of Resident #1's Resident Fund Management Service form, the facility's authorization and agreement to handle resident funds, dated 5/31/24, revealed that Resident #1 did not authorize the facility to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quarterly statements in writing to the resident or the resident's representative within 30 days after the end of the quarter for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for personal funds. (Resident identifiers are #1 and #2.) Findings include:Resident #1Review on 7/7/25 of Resident #1's quarterly statement for the quarter ending 12/31/24 revealed the quarterly statement was signed by Staff A (Administrator) on 2/3/25, not Resident #1 or Resident #1's guardian. Review on 7/7/25 of Resident #1's quarterly statement for the quarter ending 3/31/25 revealed the quarterly statement was signed by Staff A on 4/14/25, not Resident #1 or Resident #1's guardian. Interview on 7/7/25 at approximately 1:45 p.m. with Resident #1's guardian revealed that they had not received quarterly statements for Resident #1's personal fund account. Resident #2Interview on 7/7/25 at 11:20 a.m. with Resident #2 revealed they had not received any quarterly statements for their personal funds and thought they might be sent to their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident when the amount in the resident's personal fund account reaches or exceeds $200 less than the SSI (supplemental security income) recourse limit for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for personal funds. (Resident identifier is #1.)Findings include:Review on 7/7/25 of Resident #1's Resident Statement Landscape for January 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 revealed the following monthly balances: January $5784.29; February $5335.58; March $4958.66; April $4550.90; May $3604.10; June $4102.22. Interview on 7/7/25 at 1:00 p.m. with Staff B (Regional Business Office Manager) revealed that the [NAME] Medicaid SSI resource limit is $2500. Interview on 7/7/25 at 1:53 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) revealed the facility did not notify Resident #1 that they had exceeded their SSI resource limit each month from January 2025 through June 2025. Review on 7/7/25 of the facility's policy titled Accounts Receivable Policies and Procedures,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff as determined by their facility assessment. Findings Include: Review on 7/9/24 of the facilities Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data report Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1-March 31) revealed the facility had excessively low weekend staffing. Review on 7/11/24 of the facility assessment nursing staff and personnel total number needed revealed that the facility assessment determined the required Hours Per Patient Day (HPPD) for nurses aides was 1.63 HPPD. Review on 7/10/24 of the nursing staff punch reports for 6/9/24-7/10/24 revealed the following weekend dates had staffing that was below the staffing numbers determined by the facility assessment: Sunday 6/9/24- Nurse aides 1.57 HPPD; Saturday 6/22/24- Nurses aides 1.49 HPPD; Sunday 6/23/24- Nurse aides 1.45 HPPD; Saturday 6/29/24- Nurses aides 1.49 HPPD; Saturday 7/6/24- Nurses aides 1.47 HPPD; Sunday 7/7/24- Nurses aides 1.43 HPPD. Interview on 7/11/24 at approximately 1:15 p.m. with Staff M (Scheduler/Human Resources)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, review of facility policy, and review of the facility menu, it was determined that the facility failed to offer the residents a nourishing snack at bedtime while having 15 hours between the evening meal and the breakfast meal. Findings include: Interview on 7/9/24 at approximately 2:00 p.m. with the facility's Resident Council (13 residents) revealed that the majority of the residents that attended did not receive bedtime snacks. The Resident Council President stated he/she met with Staff F (Food Service Director) back in January to request more substantial snacks such as tuna, egg salad or chicken salad be available in the kitchettes. Review on 7/10/24 of the facility dining times revealed the following meal schedule: Breakfast 7:30 a.m.; Lunch 11:30 a.m.; Dinner 4:30 p.m. Review on 7/11/24 of the facility's Week At A Glance Menu of week 2 revealed the following evening snack: Sunday: Cranberry Juice and Oatmeal Creme Cookie; Monday: Apple Juice and Chocolate Creme Cookie Tuesday: Cranberry Juice and [NAME] Crackers; Wednesday: Apple Juice and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$72,924 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $72,924 — penalty dated 2025-08-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH