Pembroke Center
310 E Wardell Drive, Pembroke, NC 28372 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (910) 521-1273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $37,339 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.2% | 15.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.9% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.4% | 5.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.9% | 18.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.6% | 21.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.8% | 94.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.8% | 5.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 20.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.0% | 14.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.8% | 78.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 22.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.14 | 1.78 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.40 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.4%CMS range 29.0–60.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.5–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.6–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident #4 was admitted into the facility 12/7/2020 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance, generalized anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, and acquired absence of right leg above knee. A review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated that he was moderately cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, and no rejection of care. A review Resident #4's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus created on 2/9/21 of resident/patient exhibits or has the potential to exhibit physical and verbal behaviors related to: unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance. Interventions included evaluating the nature and circumstances (i.e., triggers) of physical behavior with resident and/or resident representative. Discuss findings with resident and family members/caregivers and adjust care delivery appropriately. Encourage the resident to seek staff support for distressed mood. Observe for non-verbal signs of physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff , Psychiatrist, Nurse Practitioner, and the Medical Director's interviews the facility failed to protect a residents right to be free from resident-to-resident abuse when Resident #1 hit and scratched Resident #2 on her left arm resulting in multiple areas of bruising and abrasions. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, and bilateral below the knee amputation. Review of the care plan dated 12/28/24 revealed Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living. There was no care plan in place regarding Resident #1 having behavioral disturbances. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. She had no physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others at the time of assessment. She required extensive two-person assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the initiation of oxygen therapy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory services (Resident #1).Findings included:Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) and congestive heart failure. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed no order for nasal cannula oxygen upon Resident #1's return to the facility. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. He received oxygen therapy and had shortness of breath when at rest and lying flat. During an observation on 5/19/26 at 3:00 PM, Resident #1 was observed in his room wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator delivering oxygen at 1 liter per minute. Resident #1 was resting with his eyes closed and showed no signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and resident, staff, Physician and Wound Physician interviews, the facility failed to administer two prescribed medications, ketoconazole 2% shampoo (an antifungal shampoo used to reduce scalp flaking, scaling, and itching) and fluocinonide 0.05% topical solution (a topical steroid used to relieve inflammation and itching) in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #1). Findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including seborrheic dermatitis (an inflammatory skin disorder affecting the scalp, face, upper chest, upper back, and skin folds. It presents as patches or plaques with inflammation, redness, and yellow, flaky scales that cause itching, burning, and irritation). A physician's order from the Dermatologist's office dated 11/6/25 for Resident #1indicated an active order for ketoconazole 2% shampoo, to be applied twice weekly with good…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews with staff, Director of Nursing, Pharmacist, Administrator, and the Medical Director, facility failed to verify right patient before administering insulin, which resulted in an insulin injection being administered to a resident with the same last name without an insulin order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #19). The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of influenza, pneumonia, and did not include diabetes (DM).Resident #19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. Resident #19's physician orders for January/2026 listed: Oxygen at 3 liters nasal cannula, albuterol, digoxin, and metoprolol. The physician orders did not include an order for insulin. Review of Resident #19's Electronic Medication Administration Record (E-MAR) dated January 2026 revealed no order listed for insulin.A nursing note dated 01/12/26 at 7:24 PM for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, Physician and Consulting Pharmacist interviews, the facility administered an expired medication that was stored in the medication cart to Resident #10 via enteral tube feeding for 9 days for a total of 18 doses. Resident #10 was sent to the Emergency Department and had no adverse outcome as a result of receiving this expired medication. Findings included:Resident # 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included stroke with aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), gastrostomy (tube feed) and gastroenteric reflux disease (GERD). Review of a physician's order written on 12/27/24 for Pantoprazole Sodium Oral (also known as Protonix) Suspension 4 milligrams/milliliter. Give 10 milliliters enterally (via tube feed) two times a day for GERD. The Minimum Data Set admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was coded as severely impaired and was coded as having a feeding tube. A hospital emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the Consultant Pharmacist, and the Medical Director interviews the facility failed to have effective safeguards and systems in place to prevent drug diversion of discontinued narcotic pain medication (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 milligrams) which resulted in a total of 20 missing tablets. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for misappropriation of medications. Findings included: Resident #3 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stage IV and stage II pressure wounds. A hospital physician's order dated [DATE] for Resident #3 revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablets 5-325 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for up to 5 days. A second hard copy physician's order dated [DATE] for Resident #3 revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablets 5-325 mgs. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain for 14 days (56 tablets). This order was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to 1) secure an unattended medication cart that was facing the hallway for 13 minutes during which time 3 staff members and a resident propelling himself in a wheelchair passed the unattended opened medication cart for 1 of 1 medication carts observed (400 hall medication cart), and 2) remove loose and unsecured pills (200 hall cart), label inhalation breathing medication vials with an open date and store the vials according to manufacturer guidelines (300 hall cart) for 2 of 4 medication carts and failed to discard expired over the counter (OTC) stock medication from 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (200 hall medication room) that were reviewed for medication storage.Findings included: 1) A continuous observation of the 400-hall medication cart on 10/02/25 from 10:10 AM to 10:23 AM revealed the medication cart was noted to be unlocked as evidenced by the lock base not being pushed in flush with the drawer and was unattended and facing the hallway. Three staff members were noted to walk past the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to 1.) implement the infection control policy and procedures for special contact and droplet precautions for a resident (Resident #68) who was positive for COVID 19. Nurse Aide # 9 was observed walking into Resident# 68's room without wearing gloves or a gown and moved the mechanical lift that was used to transfer Resident # 68 from her bed. Nurse Aide #9 rolled the mechanical lift into the hallway without cleaning it, placed it against the wall, and left the lift unattended. Nurse Aide # 9 went back into Resident #68's room without donning gloves and a gown and moved the bedside table, picked up Resident #68's water cup and handed it to the resident. 2.) implement the infection control policy and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing direct care activities to a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #28). Nurse Aide #9 and Nurse Aide #10 were observed in Resident #28's room wearing gloves and no gown while bathing and repositioning Resident #28. 3.) implement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to make choices when a nurse aide (NA) turned off a resident's (Resident #21) air conditioning after she told them not to turn it off. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for choices. Findings included:Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia affecting left side, cerebral infarction (stroke), and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact with no rejection of care behaviors in the lookback period. Resident #21's range of motion was impaired on both sides of the upper and lower extremities, she was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and dependent on staff for transfers and toileting hygiene.The care plan revised 7/24/25 revealed Resident #21 had a self-care deficit in performing activities of daily living (ADL) related to a stroke with hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of significant weight gain for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and on diuretic medication (a medication that helps the body remove excess fluid) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for notification of change. (Resident #62) Findings included: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a cumulative diagnosis including atrial fibrillation (A-fib), hypertension (HTN), congestive heart failure (CHF), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD).A physician order dated 04/28/25 revealed an order to weigh Resident #62 every day, with start date of 04/28/2025. Give Furosemide (a diuretic medication) oral tablet 40 milligrams (MG),1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN, with a start date of 4/10/2025. Give Spironolactone (a diuretic medication) oral tablet 25 MG,1 tablet by mouth in the morning for CHF.Review of Resident #62's weekly/monthly weights revealed: 09/09/25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written grievance summaries for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #10 and #62). Findings included: Review of facility policy dated 10/15/24 titled Center Operations Policies and Procedures Grievance/Concern read in part: The Administrator will serve as the Grievance Officer who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process including receiving and tracking grievances through their conclusion, issuing written grievance decision to the resident with a date the written resolution was issued with the purpose to assure prompt receipt and resolution of resident and representative grievance/concern. 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the facility's grievance log since 11/21/24 revealed a grievance dated 03/31/25 for Resident #10 by the Responsible Party (RP) regarding a concern that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect when two nurse aides (NA) on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift refused a dependent resident's (Resident #21) requests for transferring her to bed and incontinence care. Resident #21 was left sitting up in her electric wheelchair in her room that had a strong odor resembling bowel incontinence. When Resident #21's incontinence care was provided her brief was heavily soiled with a bowel movement that was caked and dried on her skin. Resident #21 was in a semi-private room, and she stated she was embarrassed and humiliated in front of her roommate by the NAs refusal of care. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for neglect. Findings included:Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia affecting left side, cerebral infarction (stroke), and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD-referring to the last day of the observation period for 2 of 22 residents sampled for assessments (Resident #17 and Resident #21).Findings included:1a. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #17's MDS assessments revealed that quarterly assessment with an ARD of 7/10/25 and the completion date was 7/30/25.b. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #21's MDS assessments revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 7/23/25 and it was completed on 8/20/25.An interview with the MDS Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (CRC) occurred on 11/16/25 at 9:19 AM. The MDS CRC stated that she knew several residents' quarterly MDS assessments had been completed late. She further stated that she worked for the company and traveled between several facilities and was not always able to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a dependent resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care (Resident #21). Findings included:Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia affecting left side, cerebral infarction (stroke), and anxiety disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact with no rejection of care behaviors in the lookback period. Resident #21 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and dependent on staff for transfers and toileting hygiene.The care plan revised 7/24/25 revealed Resident #21 had a self-care deficit in performing ADL related to a stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis. The care plan interventions included Resident #21 was dependent on the assistance of two staff members with the mechanical lift for all transfers and to provide incontinence care as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, the Registered Dietician, the Nurse Practitioner and the Physician interviews the facility failed to verify the accuracy of physician ordered weights for a resident (Resident #6) with congestive heart failure. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for quality of care. Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, the Registered Dietician, the Nurse Practitioner and the Physician interviews the facility failed to verify the accuracy of physician ordered weights for a resident (Resident #6) with congestive heart failure. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. Findings included: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dementia. A care plan dated 4/9/25 revealed Resident #6 was at nutritional risk related to frequent hospitalizations, multiple chronic disease processes, history of weight gain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the Wound Care Physician's interview, the facility failed to complete initial wound assessments upon admission to include the wound descriptions with measurements and obtain wound care orders upon admission and when the wound vac (vacuum assisted closure (vac), negative pressure wound therapy that uses suction to aid in wound healing) was not available in the facility for a resident admitted with multiple pressure wounds and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone tissue) requiring intravenous and oral antibiotics. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #86) reviewed for wound care. Findings included: Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a Stage IV pressure ulcer of the left ischium (the lower and back portion of the hip bone), Stage IV pressure ulcer on the sacrum, Stage IV pressure ulcer of the right hip, Stage II pressure ulcer on the right buttock, a deep tissue injury of the left heel, osteomyelitis (an infection of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when Nurse Aide #8 provided incontinence care to a resident (Resident #39). This resulted in Resident #39 rolling off of the bed onto the floor sustaining a fracture to the first cervical vertebrae (C1) of the cervical spine. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #39). Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA), hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), and dementia. A care plan dated 4/18/25 revealed Resident #39 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including bed mobility due to having limited mobility related to cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with hemiplegia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was severely cognitively impaired. She had no falls at the time of the assessment. Her weight was 168 pounds. She required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Registered Dietitian (RD) interviews, the facility failed to determine the accuracy of a weight when a resident had a significant weight gain of 26.8 pounds in 19 days and failed to communicate the significant weight gain to the Registered Dietitian for a nutritional assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #62). Findings included: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a cumulative diagnosis including right above the knee amputation (AKA), atrial fibrillation (A-fib), hypertension (HTN), congestive heart failure (CHF), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). A physician order dated 04/28/25 revealed an order to weigh Resident #62 every day shift every 1 month(s) starting on the 28th for 2 day(s), with start date of 04/28/2025. A review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 09/15/25 for Resident #62 revealed: Eliquis (treat Atrial fibrillation), Entresto (treat chronic heart failure), iron,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review every 12 months for 1 of 1 nursing assistant (Nurse Aide #4) reviewed to ensure in-service education was designed to address the outcome of the performance review.Findings included:Nurse Aide #4's personnel file was reviewed and revealed the date of hire of was 7/30/24. The personnel file for Nurse Aide #4 did not include evidence that a performance review had been completed for Nurse Aide #4.An interview was conducted on 11/19/25 at 9:00 AM with the Administrator who stated the Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for conducting the annual performance review for all Nurse Aides and she was aware the DON had not conducted the annual performance reviews.An interview was conducted on 11/19/25 at 9:05 AM with Nurse Aide #4. During the interview, Nurse Aide #4 stated her annual performance evaluation was due in 7/30/25 and she had not received a performance evaluation in the last year by the Director of Nursing (DON) and should have.A phone interview was conducted on 11/19/25 at 10:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the Consultant Pharmacist's interview the facility failed to act on the Pharmacist's recommendation to remove a residents (Resident #3) discontinued narcotic pain medication (Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams) from the medication cart. This resulted in 20 missing tablets. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration.Findings included:Resident #3 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stage IV pressure wound and osteomyelitis (infection of the bone). A hospital physician's order dated 7/14/25 for Resident #3 revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablets 5-325 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for up to 5 days beginning 7/14/25. This order was administered to Resident #3 from 7/15/25 through 7/19/25 and completed. A second hard copy physician's order dated 7/14/25 for Resident #3 revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen oral tablets 5-325 milligrams (mg). Give 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, the Pharmacy District Director, and the Wound Physician interviews, the facility failed to administer two intravenous (IV) antibiotics (Piperacillin Sodium Tazobactam - a broad-spectrum antibiotic used to treat moderate to severe bacterial infections and Vancomycin - an antibiotic used to treat severe infections) prescribed for the treatment of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) following admission for a resident (Resident #86). This resulted in 4 missed doses of the Piperacillin and 4 missed doses of the Vancomycin. This occurred for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. The hospital discharge instructions dated 3/15/25 revealed an order for Resident #86 for Piperacillin Sodium Tazobactam. Use 3.375 grams intravenously every 8 hours for osteomyelitis for 18 days. The hospital discharge instructions dated 3/15/25 revealed an order for Resident #86 for Vancomycin intravenous solution. Use 1 gram intravenously two times a day for osteomyelitis until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and hospice staff and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to coordinate a plan of care with the Hospice provider and ensure required Hospice documentation was in the medical record for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for Hospice care. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and end stage dementia. Resident #5's care plan dated 11/06/24 included the Hospice start date of 04/19/24 due to end stage diagnosis of dementia, and to provide activities for daily living (ADL) support, companionship and other interventions as desired by the resident, to promote comfort. An Election of Hospice Benefit form dated 02/13/25 for Resident #5 was the most current Hospice form noted in the resident's electronic medical record. The 04/18/25 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairments and hospice care was coded. Review of Resident #54's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff, Nurse Practitioner, and Consultant Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to 1.) follow a physicians order and apply an ace wrap to a residents left foot due to swelling sustained from a fall (Resident #17) and 2.) obtain a blood pressure prior to the administration of the antihypertensive medication Hydralazine 25 milligrams prescribed three times a day with parameters to hold the medication for systolic blood pressure less than 120 millimeters of mercury (Resident #5). This occurred for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings included. 1.) Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and repeated falls. A care plan dated 09/23/24 revealed Resident #17 was at risk for falls related to cognitive loss and lack of safety awareness. The goal of care was to remain free of injury. Interventions included in part to observe for changes in medical status and report to the physician. The Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, the Nurse Practitioner, and the Consultant Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to accurately transcribe an antihistamine order (Hydroxyzine 25 milligrams) prescribed as needed for itching. This resulted in the resident receiving the medication daily instead of as needed. The resident experienced no outcome from receiving the medication. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for medication administration. Findings included. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia and dementia. Review of the hospital after visit summary dated 09/11/24 for Resident #59 revealed an order for Hydroxyzine 25 milligrams (mg) administer at bedtime as needed for itching. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was cognitively intact. He required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. He had no rejection of care. Review of the Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse. Resident #80 removed some of Resident #67's belongings from her room and when Resident #67 went to retrieve the belongings Resident #80 denied having them. Resident #80 then swung at Resident #67, and in response, Resident #67 punched Resident #80 in the forehead with a closed fist for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #80 was not injured. The findings included: Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #80 had severely impaired cognition. During the assessment look back period she had verbal behaviors directed toward others on 1 to 3 days. Wandering occurred daily and she wore a wander/elopement alarm. She was able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide care safely to a dependent resident when Resident #46 fell off the bed during care on 7/30/24 and 9/20/24 resulting in minor injuries. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of history of neoplasm of brain, hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body) left dominant side, stroke, weakness, and seizures. Review of Resident #46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had impairment of the upper and lower extremities on one side, required extensive assistance of 2 people for bed mobility, total assistance of 2 people with transfers, toileting and bathing. Resident #46's height was recorded as 63 inches (5 feet 3 inches) and weighed 266 pounds. Resident #46 was coded as had pain in past 5 days and received scheduled and as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure the necessary supervision and assistance level was implemented in accordance with the resident's plan of care for the safe provision of activities of daily living care for a dependent resident. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. Findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F689: Based on record review, resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide care safely to a dependent resident when Resident #46 fell off the bed during care on 7/30/24 and 9/20/24 resulting in minor injuries. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. An interview was conducted with Resident #46 on 11/5/24 at 10:30 AM. Resident #46 stated she was supposed to have 2 people to provide her care, but the facility did not always have enough staff available, especially on night shift (11:00 PM to 7:00 AM). Resident #46 stated there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 5 of 60 days reviewed. Findings included: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report Fiscal Year - Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1-March 31, 2024) documented the facility had no RN coverage on 02/18/24, 02/24/24, 03/02/24, 03/03/24, 03/16/24, and 03/17/24. In an interview with the Nursing Scheduler/Payroll Manager on 11/07/24 at 10:15 AM she confirmed there was no RN coverage in the building for 8 hours on the following dates: 02/18/24, 03/02/24, 03/03/24, 03/16/24, and 03/17/24. She examined the staff payroll punches for the noted dates and was surprised to discover Agency Nurse #14 and Agency Nurse #15 that she thought were RNs were actually LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses) leaving the facility with no RN coverage on 5 days. She reported that the facility did have RN coverage in the building for 12 hours on 02/24/24. She explained Nurse #13 had worked on 02/24/24 and took off time later in the week to compensate because she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and Consultant Pharmacist interviews the facility failed to act on the Pharmacist recommendations to clarify the dose of an antihypertensive medication (Hydralazine 25 milligrams) and to add blood pressure checks prior to administration. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for medication administration. Findings included. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension. The Consultant Pharmacists monthly medication regimen review dated 07/12/24 for Resident #5 revealed the following order recommendation. Hydralazine oral tablets 25 milligrams (mg). Take 1 tablet (25 mg) by mouth in the morning, at noon, and at bedtime. Hold for systolic blood pressure less than 120 mm/hg (millimeters of mercury). The order does not have a vital signs order attached. The Pharmacist recommended to please review and update. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2024 and August 2024 revealed no blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain communication and coordination of services provided by Hospice in the medical record for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice services (Resident #41). Findings included: Review of the Nursing Facility Hospice Services Agreement signed 08/19/17 revealed the following: Manner of Communication: The Hospice Designee contact information and Resident Patient care information shall be provided to Nursing Facility by Hospice at the time a Resident Patient is admitted to Hospice. A cover sheet will be placed in the Resident Patient ' s chart indicating the contact information for the Hospice Designee. All communications between the Hospice and Nursing Facility pertaining to the care and services provided to the Resident Patient shall be documented in the Resident Patient's clinical record. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerosis heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews of residents, family, resident representative, and staff, the facility failed to provide nail care for dependent residents (Resident #s 32, 41, 45, and 50) and failed to provide hair wash for dependent residents (Resident #s 13, 32, 41, and 45) for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings included: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of muscular weakness. Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident was unable to participate in the brief interview for cognitive status. The resident required 2-person physical assist for bathing. There was no refusal of care. Resident #13's care plan dated 10/17/23 documented she had an activity of daily living deficit and was dependent on staff for bathing and personal care. Resident #13 was unable to be interviewed. On 11/13/23 at 2:30 pm the resident was observed in her room. The resident's hair was greasy appearing and tightly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, Pharmacy Manager, Nurse Practitioner, and the Medical Directors interviews the facility failed to provide pain management by a.) not administering an as needed dose of the opioid medication Oxycodone prescribed for pain to a resident (Resident #222) who experienced frequent pain and b.) not following up with the Pharmacy regarding the anticonvulsant medication Lyrica prescribed three times a day for pain which resulted in the resident not receiving 11 doses of the medication and having complaints of pain for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #222) reviewed for pain management. Findings included. Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Left below knee amputation. The baseline care plan for Resident #222 dated 09/20/23 did not include pain management with goals and interventions. a.) A progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to record an opened date on multi dose oral inhalers and record an opened date on ophthalmic drops on 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings included. An observation of the 300/400 hall medication carts on 11/13/23 at 12:00 PM revealed two Incruse Ellipta multidose oral inhalers that had been used with no opened date recorded. The label on the inhaler instructed to discard 6 weeks after opening. An observation of the 300/400 hall medication carts on 11/13/23 at 12:00 PM revealed an opened bottle of Latanoprost ophthalmic drops with no opened date labeled on the bottle. The manufacturer's guidelines indicated to discard Latanoprost 6 weeks after opening. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 12:30 PM Nurse #9 stated she was the assigned nurse for the 300/400 hall medication cart. She stated expiration dates should be checked prior to administering the medications. She stated she was an agency nurse and had only worked in this building 3 or 4 times over the last year. She stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put in place following the recertification and complaint investigation survey completed on 7/6/21. This was for a deficiency originally cited in the area of Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals (F761). The continued failure during two federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QA program. Findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to: F761: Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to record an opened date on multi dose oral inhalers and record an opened date on ophthalmic drops on 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. During the recertification and complaint investigation survey of 7/6/21 the facility failed to discard two opened and accessed bottles of eye drops per the pharmacy label on the box and failed to store an opened and accessed bottle of liquid nebulizer medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and the Pharmacy Managers interviews the facility failed to obtain a medication (Lyrica) prescribed for pain from the Pharmacy resulting in the resident not receiving 11 doses of the medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #222) reviewed for the provision of pharmacy services. Findings included. Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculosketal pain), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Left below knee amputation. A physicians order dated 09/20/23 for Resident #222 revealed Pregabalin (Lyrica) Oral Capsule 200 milligrams (mgs). Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for pain. Review of Resident #222s Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2023 revealed he received Lyrica three times a day from 09/22/23 through 09/25/23. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5-day assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #222 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident ' s right to be free from abuse when a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) had a physical altercation with another cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2). Resident #1 punched Resident #2 in the face on 08/10/23. Resident #2 was assessed with redness to his face and a small abrasion to his nose and forehead; his emotional response was assessed as baseline (no change). This was for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition with no moods or behaviors during the assessment look back period. He had an impairment on one side for both upper and lower extremities. He required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living. He was independent for locomotion on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain complete medical records in the area of medication administration. This occurred for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #36, Resident #38 and Resident #54) reviewed for medication administration. Findings included. 1.) Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, hypocalcemia, constipation, anxiety and depression. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated October 2024 for Resident #36 revealed the following medications with dates and time were not signed off as administered by Nurse #13: Amitiza oral capsule 24 micrograms. Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for constipation was not signed off as administered by Nurse #13 at 5:00 PM on 10/22, 10/26, 10/27, and 10/31/24. Sevelamer Carbonate tablets 800 milligrams. Give 1 tablet by mouth with meals for hypocalcemia was not signed off as administered by Nurse #13 at 5:00 PM on 10/22, 10/26, 10/27, and 10/31/24. Carvedilol oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$37,339 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $10,335 — penalty dated 2025-11-21
- $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-06-05
- $16,136 — penalty dated 2024-05-31
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2009 |
| FC GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2020 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2024 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| GENESIS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| POWERBACK REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PARHAM, SYREETA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SEDER, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345409. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.