No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Linden Grove Health Care Center

400 - 29th Street Northeast, Puyallup, WA 98373 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (253) 840-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$180,646 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (103) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $180,646 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-09)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2728 E Main · (253) 848-0131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
910 Alder Ave · (253) 863-8141 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.7 mi
708 Shaw Rd · (253) 251-5113 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13407 80th St E · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2531 Inter Ave Ste C · (253) 268-0348

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.7%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.0%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.7%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.3%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.7%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.1%82.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.1%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.971.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.081.521.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.9%CMS range 32.6–54.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.7%CMS range 6.2–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.5–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.62
RN hoursweekends
60.2%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 108.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

32
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-14)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

103 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 88 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 6 residents (Resident 1) was free from a significant medication error that resulted in opioid overdose and hospitalization in an intensive care unit, requiring administration of Narcan (a life-saving opioid-reversing medication). In addition, the facility failed to ensure correct medication administration documentation for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) reviewed for medication errors. On 08/14/2025 at 2:37 PM, the facility was notified of an Immediate Jeopardy at Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 483.45(f)(2), F760, Free of any significant medication errors, related to the facility's failure to ensure that a resident (Resident 1) was not subject to significant medication errors. The significant medication error resulted in Resident 1 being found unresponsive with abnormal vital signs, requiring hospitalization and life-saving interventions to reverse the effects of medication that was given in error. The facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and monitoring of a Foley catheter (a medical device inserted into the bladder) to prevent the occurrence of an avoidable pressure injury (PI - localized damage to skin and/or underlying soft tissue related to an inserted medical device) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed an avoidable PI to the skin around the urinary catheter insertion site, with unrelieved pain evidenced by anxiousness, rolling in bed, restlessness, verbalizing pain and discomfort that required transfer to the hospital for evaluation, treatment, and pain management. This failure placed residents at risk of infection, injury and a decreased quality of life.Findings Included.The International Wound Journal, dated 06/14/2021, defines MMPI's as a Pressure Injury [PI] located on mucous membranes with an associated history of medical device use at the site of the injury. The journal lists…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, identify, monitor, and adequately supervise residents at risk of elopement for 1 of 3 sample resident (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1, who had a cognitive impairment and lacked safety awareness, experienced harm when they exited the facility unsupervised, was subsequently observed by a bystander to fall on a freeway ramp, hit their head, and was transported by Emergency Services (EMS) personnel to a hospital for evaluation. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injury, negative outcome, and decreased quality of life. Findings included Review of a facility's policy titled, Elopements, dated 03/22/2022, noted the facility was to utilize a systematic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement or unsafe wandering, that included identification and assessment of risk, identification and analysis of hazards and risks, implementing interventions to reduce hazards and risks, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-01-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four residents (Resident 68 and 85) reviewed for range of motion/mobility, consistently received restorative services (movement of joints to maintain range of motion) to maintain or prevent declines in mobility. This failure resulted in harm to Resident 68 who experienced a decrease in left hip extension and worsening of the left knee contracture (a permanent shortening of muscle and loss of joint mobility). This failure placed residents at risk of decreased motion, mobility and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a document titled, Restorative Nursing Services, dated July 2017, showed residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. In addition, the following goals may include, but not limited to, supporting, and assisting the resident in adjusting or adapting to changing abilities, developing, maintaining, or strengthening his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address safety risk factors and provide the necessary supervision to ensure safety from avoidable accident and injuries for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. This failure resulted in harm when Resident 1 was hit by a moving vehicle while in their wheelchair unsupervised out in the parking lot of the facility. Resident 1 required emergency medical services to transfer to the hospital, sustained a fracture to the left ankle, and experienced severe pain and discomfort. Findings included . Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment tool) dated 09/06/2023, showed that Resident 1 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes, generalized muscle weakness and peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). The MDS further showed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers/bathing for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) and implementation of orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) when reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs, poor personal hygiene, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included.<Showers>Policy titled [NAME] Grove Healthcare Center Resident Shower and Personal Hygiene Policy Level II, review date: March 2021, under Policy documents [NAME] Grove Healthcare Center will provide showers, bathing assistance, and personal hygiene services according to each resident's preferences, care plan, physician orders, and individual needs while maintaining privacy, dignity, safety, and infection control standards.Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in 2014 with the latest readmission on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 6 of 6 residents (Residents 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) reviewed for insurance disenrollment were informed of the risks/benefits, options, and alternative changes in their insurance, in ways that were easy for the residents and/or the residents' representative to understand. The facility failed to develop written policies and procedures regarding the process of assisting beneficiaries with changing their health care coverage, including the need to obtain a document signed by the beneficiary or representative that acknowledges that the specific information regarding the impact of a change in coverage was provided to them orally and in writing, and that they understood the information. Failure of the facility placed residents at risk of non-coverage, increased cost out of pocket, and caused undue stress to residents and/or resident representatives and placed Managed Medicare residents at risk of the facility disenrolling them without their request,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 2 of 4 sample residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, psychosocial harm, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policies and Procedures, dated April 2021, documents 1. Policies are in place that: a. prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy further documents 2. Policies address the following as part of abuse, neglect, misappropriation prevention: c. Prevention.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unspecified Dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) with other behavioral disturbances. The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS-an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for quality of care when new skin impairments were not investigated to rule out abuse/neglect, investigation conclusions were not accurate to the identified skin impairment, treatment orders were not implemented at the time of the skin impairment identification and wound team recommendations were not followed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, worsening wounds, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration of the brain). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 04/24/2026, documented Resident 3 was severely cognitively impaired.Review of the United Wound Healing (UWH) note, dated 03/06/2026 at 9:48 AM, documented Patient would benefit from formal vascular assessment with arterial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 3 of 4 sample residents (Residents 1, 3, and 4) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, psychosocial harm, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 3 of 4 sample residents (Residents 1, 3, and 4) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, psychosocial harm, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policies and Procedures, dated April 2021, documents 1. Policies are in place that: a. prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy further documents 2. Policies address the following as part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and functional call light systems were in place across multiple units and shifts to meet residents' basic care needs, including timely response to call lights and assistance with activities of daily living. This deficient practice was systemic in nature, resulting in delayed responses, unmet care needs, and inadequate supervision for residents, and placed residents at risk for an unsafe environment, avoidable discomfort, incontinence, skin breakdown, delayed medication administration, and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Observation on 01/07/2026 at 10:47 PM showed the 100 and 200 Hall call light boards disconnected and showed blue screens saying Disconnected: click to configure connection with constant beeping. Observation on 01/13/2026 at 8:26 AM showed the [NAME] Care (call light system) at the North and South nursing station showed call lights for resident rooms were visually seen on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct performance evaluations for 5 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (Staff D, F, GG, EE, and PP) in the last 12 months. These failures placed the residents at risk of receiving less than optimal care. Findings included .Review of Staff D, F, GG, EE and PP, CNAs, employee files found no documentation that the annual performance evaluations had been conducted. During an interview on 01/12/2026 at 3:28 PM, Staff AA, Human Resources/Payroll, stated that they were aware that the CNAs needed performance evaluations yearly; however, they had not been completed. During an interview on 01/13/2026 at 11:40 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated due to staff changes, performance evaluations were not completed, and this did not meet expectations. Reference WAC 388-97-1680

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were palatable, prepared, and served in a manner acceptable to residents across the facility, as evidenced by widespread and ongoing resident complaints regarding food quality, taste, temperature, portion size, and accuracy of meal trays. This deficient practice affected multiple residents over an extended period of time, resulting in residents refusing meals, requesting frequent substitutions, and reporting unmet nutritional needs, placing residents at risk for reduced nutritional intake, avoidable weight loss, delayed medical improvement, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.<RESIDENT INTERVIEWS> During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 12:26 AM, Resident 19 stated they would not feed the facility's food to their pet because it did not taste good. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 3:51 PM, Resident 115 stated the facility's food was terrible and was often greasy so they could not eat it. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 1:20 PM, Resident 40 stated the facility's food was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a full-time qualified social worker. This failure placed residents at risk of lacking medically related social services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of facility licensing data, effective 06/01/2020, showed the facility was licensed for 130 beds.During an interview on 01/08/2026 at 2:13 PM, Staff V, Social Services Assistant, stated the facility's Social Services Director had been on maternity leave for two weeks and they were handling the qualified social worker duties until they returned. Staff V stated they were told they would receive assistance during the social services director's leave but were unsure when this help would arrive. Staff V stated they did not have formal education in the field of social work.During an interview on 01/08/2026 at 2:29 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the facility was licensed for 130 beds. Staff A stated the facility employed a qualified social worker to ensure residents had access to medically related social services. Staff A said the qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate medication practices by leaving medications unattended at the bedside for residents who were not assessed or approved to self-administer medications for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 40, 15, and 114) reviewed for accident hazards. This practice was inconsistent with the residents' interdisciplinary team (IDT) assessment and care plan and placed the residents at risk for adverse medication outcomes.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, dated February 2021 showed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. It showed, Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party. Resident 40 Review of the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 88 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 40, 7 and 8) when reviewed for hospitalization and failed to provide written notice of transfer/discharge and recapitulation of their stay for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 40 and 111) when reviewed for discharge. These failures placed the residents at risk for lacking knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital and diminished quality of life.Resident 1 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes (when the body doesn't process sugars) and respiratory failure. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the progress notes showed Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No documentation was found that the resident was offered a bed hold. During an interview on 01/09/2026 at 12:18 PM, Staff B, Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set assessment (MDS) accurately reflected the status for 3 of 27 sampled residents (Residents 10, 8 and 40) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care and a diminished quality of life. Resident 10 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with mood disorder symptoms), depression (mood disorder), and anxiety (emotion associated with worry, fear or panic). Resident 10 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 11:36 AM, Resident 10 stated they were unable to hear anything in their left ear. Resident 10 stated they preferred for anyone speaking to them to come to their right side so they could hear clearly. Review of Resident 10's care plan dated 09/24/2022 showed the resident has impaired communication as evidenced by left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for 5 of 22 residents (Residents 12, 8, 2, 37 and 51) reviewed for care plan review. This failure placed the residents at risk for injuries, unmet needs, care not provided as ordered and a diminished quality of life.Resident 12 Resident 12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (high blood glucose), high blood pressure and muscle weakness. Resident 12 was able to make needs known. Observation and interview on 01/05/2026 at 10:57 AM, showed Resident 12 with a wander guard device on their left wrist. Resident 12 stated they did not know what the device was for. Observations on 01/06/2026 at 4:08 PM, 01/08/2026 at 11:46 AM, 01/09/2026 at 8:28 AM and 2:30 PM and 01/12/2026 at 3:13 PM showed Resident 12 asleep in bed with the wander guard in place. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed the most recent Elopement Risk assessment was completed on 06/06/2025. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 117, 99 and 17) when reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, decreased sense of self-worth and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 117 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 117 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include obesity (having unhealthy amount of extra body fat), history of falling, and presence of left artificial (manmade) knee joint. Resident 117 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 9:49 AM, Resident 117 stated they had a shower a couple of days ago; however, when they asked for one, they did not always get one. Resident 117 stated they had asked a staff member how often they could have a shower and were told they just had to ask for one but that was not true, because they have had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 40, 42 and 51) when reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to obtain and/or follow physician orders for oxygen (O2) therapy, ensure O2 saturation (Sats, the percentage of red blood cells carrying O2 in the blood) was ordered with parameters, care plan, and ensure O2 concentrators (a device used for O2 therapy) filters (used to protect the resident from particulate matter) were cleaned and maintained routinely, placed residents at risk for unmet needs and potential negative outcomes.Findings included . Resident 40 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 40 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of conditions that cause difficulty in breathing), respiratory failure, and high blood pressure. Resident 40 was able to make needs known.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered only when necessary and in accordance with provider orders for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 4, 115, 2, and 99) when reviewed for unnecessary medications/pain management. Failure to ensure non-medicated methods of pain relief were used before pain medications and ensuring blood pressure medications were provided per parameters placed residents at risk of using unnecessary medications, avoidable side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 4 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 4 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (high blood glucose), congestive heart failure (when the heart is unable to pump blood efficiently) and depression. Resident 4 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 4's current providers orders showed the resident received Roxicodone (a narcotic pain medication) every eight hours as needed (PRN) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident refrigerators were maintained to ensure food was safely stored for 2 of 2 sampled refrigerators (100 and 200 Hall Refrigerators) when reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness, avoidable discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Safe Handling of Foods from Visitor, revised 03/28/2024, showed, Label foods with resident's name, and the current date and 'use by date'. Items will be thrown out after 48 hours and Have temperature monitored daily for refrigeration < 41 F. Observation on 01/07/2026 at 11:54 PM showed the 100 Hall Resident Refrigerator contained the following items: 1) A bag teriyaki in Styrofoam packaging inside with a receipt showing the order was placed on 01/01/2026; 2) A cup of soup with no date label; 3) A plastic container teriyaki dated 12/08/2025; 4) A box of fried chicken with no date or resident name; 5) A bag with lettuce with brown spot spoilage with no date or name; 6) A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections by completing the analyzation of infection control data, identifying trends, and completing follow-up activities in response to those trends for 3 of 3 months (October, November and December 2025) when reviewed for Infection Control. The facility also failed to implement transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 2 of 4 halls when reviewed for TBP. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for communicable diseases and infections, poor clinical outcomes, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility document titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 01/21/2025 showed they followed accepted infection prevention and control standards set by the Centers for Disease Control. <Tracking/Trending> Review of the facility provided infection control surveillance documentation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pneumococcal vaccines for 3 of 7 residents who consented to the vaccine (Residents 5,19 and 35) and failed to provide education on the risks and benefits of vaccines for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 42, 63 and 65) when reviewed for immunizations. These failures placed the residents at risk for communicable diseases and denied the residents the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding receiving immunizations. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine dated August 2025 showed the facility would assess all residents on admission for the eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine and when indicated provide the vaccine information sheet (VIS) and education on the risks and benefits and administer the vaccine within 30 days of admission if consented. Resident 5 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) on 01/11/2026 showed Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided risks/benefits and provided consent prior to being administered psychotropic (mind altering) medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 114) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of unknown side effects, inability to advocate in their medication regimen, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 115 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease affecting brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and anxiety. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the provider's orders showed Resident 115 received the following psychotropic medications: citalopram hydrobromide (an antidepressant), alprazolam (an antianxiety), and methylphenidate (an antidepressant). Review of the EHR did not show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate a resident's expressed preference for grooming services by not assisting the resident with accessing a haircut after onsite salon services were discontinued for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 4) when reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the resident at risk for lack of dignity and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 4 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (high blood glucose), congestive heart failure (when the heart is unable to pump blood efficiently) and depression. Resident 4 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/09/2026 at 10:35 AM, Resident 4 stated they had been waiting for a haircut and had informed staff multiple times. Resident 4 stated upon admission the facility had a hairdresser who came regularly but had not been providing services for several months. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN, a notification that provides an estimated cost of continuing services which may no longer be covered by Medicare. Beneficiaries may choose to continue the services but may be financially liable), was provided timely and/or completed as required for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 93 and 23) when reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This failure placed residents at risk of not upholding their right to make informed choices about further treatment or services as required by the Medicare Program.Findings included . Resident 93Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), dated 07/30/2025, showed the facility informed Resident 93 that skilled nursing services would end on 08/01/2025 and the form was signed by the resident or representative on 07/30/2025. Resident 93's SNF ABN dated 08/04/2025 showed it was provided and signed by the resident or representative on 08/04/2025 (three days after the last covered date of skilled services ended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment to include a mattress for a bed frame for 1 of 22 sampled Residents (Resident 8) reviewed for homelike environment. This failure placed the Resident at risk for decreased mood and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemorrhage in brain stem (bleeding in brain stem), depression, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 8 was not always able to communicate needs. Observation on 01/05/2026 at 9:55 AM showed Resident 8 in their room with a bed frame that had exposed metal frame. Observation on 01/07/2026 at 8:56 AM, showed Resident 8 in their bed with second bed near them with no mattress or covers. Observation on 01/08/2026 at 9:56 AM showed Resident 8 laying in their bed with bed frame nearby with no mattress and no covers. Observation on 01/09/2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a follow up assessment for a Wander Guard (device that alarms and restricts movement in and out of doors) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 13) when reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the Resident at risk for unmet needs, decline in mood, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility's policy Use of Restraints, undated, showed under section 1 Physical Restraints were defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restrict normal access to one's body and under section 16, The assessment reviews are to be at least quarterly to determine reduction. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (term for decline in mental abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (medications affecting the mind) were prescribed to treat a specific condition for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 13 and 115) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable side effects, chemical restraint, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 13 Review of the facility's policy Psychotropic Medication Use revision date 03/01/2025 showed under section 7, All medications used to treat behaviors must have clinical indication and be monitored for efficacy, risks, benefits and harm or adverse consequences, and under section10, If provider orders psychotropic medication in the absence of a diagnosis, the facility should ensure that the ordering prescriber reviews the medication plan and consider a gradual dose reduction (GDR). Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written abuse policies by failing to identify potential mental abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 46) when reviewed for abuse. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct and/or obtain reference checks/information from previous or current employers prior to hire for 5 out of 5 sampled staff (Staff D, Staff JJ, Staff C, Staff HH, and Staff H) and to complete timely criminal background checks for 2 out of 5 sampled staff (Staff D and C) when reviewed for abuse and neglect prevention. These failures placed the residents at risk for abuse, mental suffering, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, revised on 10/25/2024 showed the center/facility would implement an abuse prohibition program that included;Screening of potential hires;Identification of possible incidents or allegations which need investigation;Investigation of incidents and allegations;Protection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 46) when reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident at risk of further abuse, psychological distress, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .According to the Nursing Home Guidelines also known as the Purple Book, sixth edition, dated October 2015, reporting requirements included that staff to resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment, sexual or physical abuse/assault were to be reported to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) state hotline, the police, and logged on the DSHS reporting log within five days Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, revised on 10/25/2024 showed the center/facility would implement an abuse prohibition program. Review showed, Mental Abuse includes, but not limited to humiliation, harassment, and threats of punishment or deprivation. Mental abuse may occur through either verbal or nonverbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive plan of care for 2 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 8 and 17) when reviewed for care plans. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.Resident 8 Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemorrhage in brain stem (Bleeding in brain stem), gastrostomy (surgically placed external opening into stomach), major depression, anxiety, psychotic disorder with delusions ( fixed, false beliefs held with extraordinary conviction despite clear evidence of the contrary) and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 8 was not always able to communicate needs. Review of the provider's orders dated 12/31/2025 showed Resident 8 was to have nothing by mouth (NPO) status. Observation on 01/05/2026 at 9:55 AM, showed Resident 8 in their room with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a device to prevent pressure ulcers was applied per provider's order for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 114) when reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable skin injury, pain, decrease in activities of daily living, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 114 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (a type of stroke where part of the brain dies because its blood supply gets blocked), high blood pressure, and atherosclerosis (narrowing of blood vessels, restricting blood flow) of both legs. Resident 114 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 9:15 AM, Resident 114 stated their left heel was sensitive and they were supposed to wear a boot on their left heel, but the staff forgot about it. Resident 114 stated that staff had told them a couple of times that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality of care related to monitoring of resident weights, bowel management/treatments, or edema management/treatment for 4 of 22 sampled resdients (Residents 5, 2, 13, and 99) when reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of unintended weight loss, untreated constipation, discomfort, unmitigated swelling, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 5 Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (mental health condition with significant mood swings) and adult failure to thrive (significant decline in health and functional abilities). Resident 5 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 5's electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 5 weighed 147 pounds on 11/10/2025 and 123 pounds on 12/02/2025. Review of a progress note dated 12/05/2025 showed, Weight warning: MDS: five percent change over 30 days. Resident noted with variable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the root cause of a fall, ensure new interventions were appropriately developed or timely initiated and analyzed in an effort to prevent future falls, failed to maintain safe food storage in a resident's personal refrigerator, and/or left unsecured chemicals in a resident's bathroom for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 114 and 40) when reviewed for accidents. These failures placed residents at risk of injuries, foodborne illness, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. <Falls> Resident 114 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 114 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (a type of stroke where part of the brain dies because its blood supply gets blocked), high blood pressure, muscle weakness, and acquired absence of right leg above the knee. Resident 114 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with significant weight loss were identified, assessed and that interventions were implemented for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 5) when reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the resident at risk of malnourishment, poor healing, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (mental health condition with significant mood swings) and adult failure to thrive (significant decline in health and functional abilities). Resident 5 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 5's EHR showed Resident 5 weighed 147 pounds on 11/10/2025 and 123 pounds on 12/02/2025. Review of a progress note dated 12/05/2025 showed, Weight warning: MDS: five percent change over 30 days. Resident noted with variable meal intake, order placed to reweigh. Review of the EHR showed no documentation Resident 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into stomach or small intestines) was administered in accordance with provider's orders and professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 8) when reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to have a system in place which ensured the amount of formula (liquid food product) and water a resident receives was reconciled with the amount they were ordered to receive. This failure placed the Resident at risk for inadequate nutrition, dehydration, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemorrhage in brain stem (bleeding in brain stem), gastrostomy (surgically placed external opening into stomach), major depression, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain management that is consistent with professional standards for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 99 and 17) when reviewed for pain management. Failure to administer pain medications per providers ordered parameters placed the residents at risk for uncontrolled pain and decreased quality of life. Findings included.Resident 99 Review of the electronic heath record (EHR) showed Resident 99 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and chronic venous hypertension of unknown cause (high pressure in leg veins due to faulty valves, causing swelling, pain, skin changes, cramps, and ulcers/open wound) with ulcer of bilateral lower extremity (both lower legs/ankles/feet), and fibromyalgia (a long-term condition causing the brain and spinal cord to become overly sensitive to pain signals, amplifying them). Resident 99 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/06/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. A total of two errors were made in twenty-seven opportunities equaling a 7.4% medication error rate during medication administration for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 7 and 52) when reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk of receiving medications that were not effective or less effective and a diminished quality of life. Finings included. Observation on 01/09/2026 at 8:14 AM, showed Staff Y, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administering medications to include vitamin C 500mg to Resident 7. Review of the January 2026 medication administration record (MAR) showed Resident 7 did not have an order for Vitamin C 500mg and had received the wrong medication. Review of the January 2026 MAR showed Resident 7 had an order for cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12) 500mcg that was not administered. Observation on 01/09/2026 at 7:57 AM showed Staff K, LPN, administering medications to Resident 52 to include Folic acid 1000mcg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure (lock) 1 of 4 treatment Carts (Cart South 2) and 1 of 6 medication Carts (Cart South 3) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for medication diversion and misuse, lack of safety, poisoning, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the Facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised on November 2020, showed, Drugs and biological used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. Observation on 01/07/2026 at 10:56 PM, showed the treatment Cart South 2 was unlocked without nurse supervision for 10 minutes. Staff X, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was called to lock the cart. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 11:00 PM, Staff X stated the nurse responsible for Cart South 2 was on break. Staff X stated the cart should have been locked. Observation on 01/09/2026 at 7:38 AM, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 immunizations for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 26 and 19) reviewed for COVID-19 immunization. This failure placed the residents at an increased risk for complications related to COVID-19 infection that could result in severe illness or death. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) - Vaccination of Residents undated, showed each resident would be offered the Covid-19 vaccine and if the resident or their representative consents to the vaccine the facility would provide the vaccine at the facility or arrange with an outside service. Resident 26Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes (when the body cannot process sugars) and had consented to receive the Covid-19 vaccine on 12/16/2025. No documentation was found in the EHR of the administration of the vaccine. Resident 19Review of the EHR showed Resident 19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have psychotropic medication (medications that affect a person's mental state) consents completed, signed, and in place prior to residents receiving these medications for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 92, 87, and 2) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. This failure placed the resident or their legal representatives at risk for lack of knowledge to make an informed decision regarding the use of the medication, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 92 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 92 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. The quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 12/19/2024, showed Resident 92 had diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia (sleeplessness). Review of Resident 92's January 2025 medication administration records (MAR) from 01/01/2025 - 01/23/2025 showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain provider's order, assessment and consent for the use of low bed for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 86, 74 and 89) reviewed for use of physical restraints. This failure placed the residents at risk for injury, unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Use of Restraints, revised April 2017, showed, (1) Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body [ .] (9) Restraints shall only be used upon the written order of a physician and after obtaining consent from the resident and/or representative. Resident 86 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include intracranial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 77 Review of the EHR showed Resident 77 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 77 had diagnoses that included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), depression, and osteoarthritis (a condition that causes pain, stiffness, and reduced movement in the joints). During an interview on 01/22/2025 at 11:50 AM, Resident 77 stated about five months ago a man creeped into their room, the man had a mental problem, and staff were aware. During a follow-up interview on 01/23/2024 at 10:04 AM, Resident 77 stated about six months ago they heard the door to their room shaking, a white man with white hair kicked the door open, they told the man to get out, and they told staff about it. Review of the facility's incident reporting log from August 2024 through January 24, 2025, showed no incident logged for a resident-to-resident altercation for Resident 77. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an ordered intervention (Low Air Loss Mattress - LALM, a mattress used to redistribute pressure evenly and can help prevent pressure ulcers, also known as bedsores) was being monitored and used as directed in the prevention of pressure ulcers for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 73, 83, and 18) when reviewed for pressure wound related interventions. This failure prevented the facility implementing the plan of care that included the needed intervention (LALM) to promote wound healing and prevent decline. Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) dated 02/20/18, described/defined that a suspected deep tissue injury as: Intact or non-intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue. This injury can result from prolonged pressure and may either resolve or develop into further tissue loss. Findings included . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a registered nurse (RN) working a minimum of eight hours each day for 60 of 92 days when reviewed for staffing. This failure placed the residents at risk for delayed assessments/treatments and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . Review of the working nursing schedule for the month of July 2024 showed no RN scheduled for 23 of 31 days. Review of the working nursing schedule for the month of August 2024 showed no RN scheduled for 19 of 31 days. Review of the working nursing schedule for the month of September 2024 showed no RN scheduled for 18 of 30 days. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 9:36 AM, Staff Q, Staffing Coordinator, stated they did their best with the RN nurses that were available and were scheduled, and the facility just did not have enough. During an interview on 01/30/2025 at 10:15 AM, via electronic communication, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated the expectation was for the staffing coordinator to prioritize RN coverage. Staff B stated not having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 48 Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident 48 readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart and lung disease, fibromyalgia (a chronic condition characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain and fatigue), quadriplegia (paralysis or loss of ability to move all four limbs), radiculopathy (a condition whereas one or more nerve roots in the spinal column becomes compressed and irritated), anxiety and depression. The electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 48 was able to make needs known and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident 48's current care plan, multiple dates, showed the resident exhibited or was at risk for alterations in comfort related to chronic pain and musculoskeletal disorder. Interventions on the care plan documented licensed nurses (LN) were to monitor for pain and attempt NPI to alleviate pain and document effectiveness. Review of Resident 48's MAR for January 2025 showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program self-identified deficiencies and failed to develop/implement effective plans of action to sustain plan of corrections for previous deficiencies. Failure to have an effectively functioning QAPI program that consistently self-identified deficient practices led to repeated deficiencies, and a pattern of deficiencies that placed residents at repeated risk for unmet needs that could negatively impact their safety, quality of life and quality of care. Findings included . <Self-Identify Areas of Concern> Refer to the following citations identified during the Long Term Care survey, dated 01/29/2025, which were not identified or were identified and not addressed. (D = Isolated, E = Pattern): REFER TO F609 (E) Reporting of Alleged Violations. The Long Term Care survey dated 01/29/2025: the facility failed to identify and investigate allegations of abuse/neglect for 6 of 7 sampled residents. REFER TO F686 (E) Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to periodically review a resident's advanced directive (AD, a legal document that states your wishes for medical care if you are unable to make decisions for yourself) and obtain and maintain court-appointed guardianship (legal process where a court appoints someone to make decisions for a person who is unable to do so for themselves) documentation for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 77) when reviewed for advanced directive. This failure placed the resident at risk of not having an established decision maker, lack of ability to direct care, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 77 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. The quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/15/2024, showed Resident 77 had diagnoses that included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 62) reviewed for environment. Failure to ensure a wheelchair was in good repair placed the resident at risk for infections, injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed that Resident 62 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cancer and depression and was able to make needs known. Observation and interview on 01/23/2025 at 9:30 AM showed both armrests on Resident 62's wheelchair had multiple cracked areas in the vinyl with exposed beige material underneath which created an uncleanable surface. Resident 62 stated it was their personal wheelchair and eventually the material on the armrests just cracked. Follow-up observation and interview on 01/29/2025 at 10:54 AM showed Resident 62's wheelchair armrests continue to be in disrepair. Resident 62 stated both armrests on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect when it prevented transfer out of a power wheelchair for three nights, prevented wound care during that time and caused distress related to transfer assistance from staff for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 78) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed facility residents at risk of not receiving required care and services and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, showed all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management . All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The administrator initiates investigations. Resident 78…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason for hospital transfer to the resident or responsible party and/or Washington State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program (Ombuds) for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 81 & 13) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for not knowing rights regarding transfer and discharge from the facility, and diminished protection from been inappropriately discharged . Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain) and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Resident 81 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 81's EHR showed a hospitalization on 01/21/2025, and readmission to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR did not show documentation a notice of transfer was provided to Resident 81 or their representative. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 81 and 13) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lacking knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain) and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Resident 81 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 81's EHR showed a hospitalization on 01/21/2025, and readmission to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR did not show documentation or progress notes related to a bed hold for the hospitalization. During an interview on 01/23/2025 at 12:46 PM, Staff D, Business Office Manager (BOM), stated it was their responsibility to follow up on bed holds;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the status for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 41) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a mental health screening tool). This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for not receiving the care and services required to meet their needs. Findings included . Review of electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease that blocks airflow and make it difficult to breath), depression, and personality disorder (mental and behavioral disorder associated with significant distress or disability and have negative impact on the quality of life). Resident 41 was able to communicate needs. Review of the PASARR, dated 05/07/2020, showed Resident 41 had a level 2 evaluation and required special interventions and follow up by a provider. Review of the minimum data set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a mental health screening tool) assessments were accurately or timely completed for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 92 & 360) reviewed for PASARRs and unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified mental health care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 92 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed that Resident 92 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. Review of the admission minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/26/2024, showed Resident 92 had diagnoses of depression and insomnia. It showed Resident 92 received antianxiety, antidepressant, and hypnotic (used to induce sleep) medications. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident 92 had diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia (sleeplessness). Review of Resident 92's level 1 PASARR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 39 & 84) whose care plans were reviewed. Failure to develop and implement care plans that were individualized, and accurately reflected resident care needs related to impaired vision and smoking status placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 39 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and anxiety disorder. Resident 39 was able to make needs known. Review of the annual minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/07/2024 showed in Section B that Resident 39 had impaired vision with no corrective lenses. It showed in Section V that Resident 39's care area assessment was triggered to have a care plan for visual function developed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed conduct timely care planning meetings with residents or responsible party for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 48 & 77) reviewed for care planning. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, care not provided as directed, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 48 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 48 readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart and lung disease, fibromyalgia (a chronic condition characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain and fatigue), quadriplegia (paralysis or loss of ability to move all four limbs) and depression. Resident 48 was able to make needs known and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. During an interview at 01/22/2025 at 1:21 PM, Resident 48 stated they did not recall having a recent care conference. During an interview on 01/23/2025 at 12:11 AM, Staff S, Social Service Director, stated Resident 48's last care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for diagnosing residents with mental health disorders 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for use of unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included diabetes (high sugar in the blood), heart failure, depression and suicidal ideation. Resident 2 was able to communicate needs. Review of the EHR showed Resident 2 received a level 2 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a mental health screening tool). Review of the PASARR level 2 showed, 2) why is [Resident 2] on quetiapine (psychoactive medication)? Admiting MD (physician) note states this is for 'schizophrenia' (mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a mobility device was available for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4) when reviewed for mobility. The facility failed to implement a bowel program for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 24 and 108) reviewed for bowel management. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, worsening condition, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Mobility Device> Resident 4 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include malignant melanoma (skin cells that become cancerous), malnutrition, depression and diabetes (high sugar in blood). Resident 4 was able to make needs known. Observations on 01/22/2025 and 01/24/2025 showed Resident 4 lying in bed, naked. During an interview on 01/23/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident 4 stated they did not get out of bed because the facility had not provided them a wheelchair which matched their height.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure risk factors were consistently monitored and addressed to minimize the risk for accident hazards for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 94 and 86) when reviewed for accident hazards. The failures to consistently monitor and ensure a wanderguard devices was functional for Resident 94 and to identify and minimize the risk factors for falls for Resident 86 placed them at risk for potential injury, negative outcomes and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility's policy titled, Tab Alarms, Bed Alarms, Wanderguard System, dated 12/12/2024, showed the wanderguard (a wearable device used to monitor and alert caregivers when a resident with dementia or cognitive impairment attempts to leave a safe area) would be used for residents at risk for elopement (when a resident identified as wandering leaves the facility without staff knowledge or authorization). A plan of care must be formulated with the Interdisciplinary Team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations were administered as ordered to prevent continued weight loss for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 73) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and continued weight loss. Findings included . Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment tool) dated 12/12/2024 showed that Resident 73 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart and lung disease, hospice (end of life care), dementia (progressive decline in brain functions), and malnutrition. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident was able to make needs known, received hospice care (care provided to sick or terminally ill residents), was dependent and required substantial/maximal assistance by staff to assist with meals. Review of a Registered Dietitian (RD) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 73 would benefit from increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with provider orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 59) reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to follow provider's orders for oxygen (O2) therapy placed residents at risk for unmet needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 59 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and asthma. Resident 59 used oxygen therapy. Review of current provider orders, dated January 2025, showed Oxygen at 1-2 liters per minute by nasal canula every day and night shift. Observations throughout the day on 01/23/2025 and 01/24/2025 showed an unused O2 concentrator with no oxygen tubing in the corner of the room. Resident 59 was not observed wearing a nasal canula or using oxygen. During an interview on 01/24/2025 at 1:03 PM, Resident 59 stated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication per provider's order to ensure a resident was able to participate in physical therapy services for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 24) reviewed for position and mobility. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased mobility, increased pain, unidentified and unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's document Pain Protocol, dated October 2022, showed the nursing staff would assess each individual for pain upon admission to the facility, at the quarterly review, whenever there was a significant change in condition, and when there was onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic neurological disorder), pressure ulcer of right hip (a deep wound that may impact muscle, tendons, ligaments, and bone), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on the consultant pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations and/or to have clearly documented rationale for not following the recommendation for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 92) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. This failure placed the resident at risk for experiencing adverse side effects, medical complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 92 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. The quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 12/19/2024 showed Resident 92 had diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia (sleeplessness). Review of Resident 92's provider orders showed an order dated 09/19/2024 for Clonazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) two times a day for anxiety and an order dated 11/15/2024 for Zolpidem Tartrate (a hypnotic medication used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct gradual dose reduction (GDR, a trial attempt to discontinue a medication) were free from excessive dosages and durations without adequate monitoring and indications for use, or in the presence of adverse consequences, related to the use of psychoactive (affecting the mind) medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 94) and failed to monitor for psychoactive medication side effects for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 87 and 92) when reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility's failure to monitor behaviors and side effects and conduct GDR related to use of psychoactive medications placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Gradual Dose Reduction> Review of a policy titled, Tapering Medications and Gradual Drug Dose Reduction, dated July 2022, showed after medications were ordered for a resident, the staff and provider shall seek an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored prior to medication administration, in accordance with accepted professional standards, in 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors and potential adverse events. Findings included . According to Elsevier Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, 8th edition, p. 495 (Mosby 2014), when administering oral medications, nurses are to follow the five rights of medication administration (right patient, right drug (medication), right dose, right route, and right time), and to prepare medications for one patient at a time. Review of the facility's policy, Medication and Treatment Administration Guidelines, revised [DATE], documented medications are to be administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. On [DATE] at 4:57 PM, Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), was observed at a medication cart parked on 200 Hall. On top of the cart were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dressing changes were completed as ordered by the provider for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet needs, decline in status, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including high blood pressure, a stroke, and one-sided paralysis. The Minimum Data Assessment, an assessment tool, dated 04/04/2024, documented Resident 1 was alert and non-verbal, and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living. Review of Resident 1's record showed an order dated 12/20/2024 for wound care and dressing changes to one of Resident 1's feet to be done two times a day and as needed. The dressings were to be done at 7:00 AM and at 5:00 PM every day. Review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record for December 2024 showed blanks or spaces without documentation for the 5:00 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consents were obtained for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for consents for Wanderguard (a device worn on or close to the resident's body designed to alarm when the resident came within close proximity to an alarmed exit door), and failed to ensure physician orders and consents were obtained for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy entitled, Use of Restraints, revised April 2017, documented, 1. Physical Restraints' are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body . 9. Restraints shall only be used upon the written order of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of direct care supervision by a Registered Nurse (RN) for 9 of 29 days reviewed and failed to meet the State RN staffing requirement of 24-Hour RN coverage for 29 of 29 days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure placed residents at risk for delay in resident assessments, identification of changes in condition, provision of care and services outside the scope of practice of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the daily nursing staff forms for May 2024 provided by Staff C, Staffing Coordinator, on 05/30/2024, showed no RN coverage for the following dates: 05/04/2024, 05/05/2024, 05/10/2024, 05/11/2024, 05/12/2024, 05/18/2024, 05/19/2024, 05/25/2024, and 05/26/2024. The daily nursing staff forms for the remainder days of May 2024 showed 8-hour RN coverage only. In an interview on 05/30/2024 at 2:15 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS)/RN, said they were aware the facility did not provide 24-hour RN coverage. Staff B said there were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services for all facility residents. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with Restorative services, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and call light response in accordance with established clinical standards, care plans, and preferences. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident Council Review of the RC meeting minutes for November 2023 showed residents reported longer than expected wait times during the night shift for their call light to be answered. Restorative During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 11:24 AM, Resident 68 stated that it required two staff to get them out of bed but there's never enough help. During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 9:47 AM, Staff Q, Restorative Nursing Aid, stated that they conducted restorative Mondays,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to control and prevent the transmission of a communicable disease by ensuring the proper application of transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 2 of 2 hallways (North and South) and to ensure the proper use and fit of personal protective equipment (PPE) by staff during an outbreak of a respiratory virus. The facility also failed to provide laundry services in a safe and sanitary manner. These failures placed residents, visitors, and staff at risk for a communicable disease, infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . North Hall Review of the facility's outbreak line list map dated 01/21/2024 showed seven residents (Residents 364 on the north hall and Residents 29, 361, 94, 38, 50 and 97 on the south hall) tested positive for Covid-19 (a highly contagious respiratory virus) on 01/19/2024. Review of a facility email dated 01/19/2024, which contained recommendations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct timely care planning meetings with the resident or responsible party for 2 of 24 residents (Residents 38 and 49) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, not being involved or informed of their plan of care and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 38 During an interview on 01/22/2024 at 10:28 AM, Resident 38 stated that they did not have a recent care conference. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed the last care plan meeting was held on 03/02/2023. Resident 49 During an interview on 01/21/2024 at 11:13 AM, Resident 49 stated that they did not believe they had a care conference. Review of the EHR showed the last care plan meeting was on 06/05/2023. During an interview on 01/25/2024 at 11:54 AM, Staff A, Administrator (ADM), stated that the facility had been without Social Services staff and that was why care conferences were not completed. Staff A stated that it was their expectation that care conferences were held every three months or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services to assist residents with activities of daily living (ADL) for 5 of 24 residents (Residents 88, 4, 12, 26, and 48) reviewed for activities of daily living. Failure to provide showers as scheduled (Residents 88, 4, 12, and 26) and assistance to get out of bed (Resident 48) placed the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a document titled, Bath, Shower/Tub [Personal Care], dated February 2018, showed that the purpose of the procedure was to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. The document showed that the facility staff were to date and time the shower/tub bath was performed, the name and titled of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath, conduct an assessment data of any reddened areas, sores, etc, on the residents skin, how the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care which met professional standards for 5 of 24 residents (Residents 14, 38, 71, 59, and 48) when reviewed for quality of care. The facility's failure to consistently monitor and document bowel movements and implement the bowel program when needed (Residents 14, 38, 71, and 59), failure to monitor for adverse side effects (Resident 38), failure to identify and monitor a skin condition (Resident 48) placed the residents at risk for worsening condition, discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Bowel Program Resident 14 Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS), a required assessment tool, dated 10/08/2023, showed resident was able to make needs known and was diagnosed with chronic pain and constipation. During an interview on 01/22/2024 at 9:18 AM, Resident 14 stated that they had constipation, it was a problem and sometimes would have three days without a bowel movement (BM). Review of a care plan dated 03/06/2023 showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary medications for 5 of 9 residents (Residents 71, 26, 2, 59, and 38) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to provide nonpharmacological interventions prior to as needed pain medications (Residents 38, 26, 2, and 59) and to monitor for anticoagulation (blood thinning) side effects (Resident 71) placed the residents at risk for unintended side-effects related to the medications, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . <Anticoagulation> Review of a document titled Anticoagulation - Clinical Protocol revised November 2018 showed, The staff and physician will monitor for possible complications in individuals who are being anticoagulated and will manage related problems. If an individual on anticoagulation therapy shows signs of excessive bruising, hematuria, hemoptysis, or other evidence of bleeding, the nurse will discuss the situations with the physician before giving the next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and assessment of medications for mental health for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 81, 5, 12 and 26) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. Lack of meetings to discuss medications (Residents 81 and 5), lack of blood pressure monitoring (Resident 12) and prolonged use of as needed medications (Resident 26) placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications, avoidable side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 81 During an interview and observation on 01/22/2024 at 11:05 AM, Resident 81 stated that they were concerned that people were looking into the bathroom window and invading their privacy. Observation showed a fogged window in the bathroom that could not be seen through. Resident 81 stated that they were concerned about the black things crawling in the corners of the room and pointed to a nearby corner. Observation showed that there was nothing in the indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary food storage program in 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for food safety. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation on 01/21/2024 at 10:14 AM showed a small shelf next to the grease hood in the facility kitchen which held a personal cellular phone. Observation on 01/21/2024 at 11:35 AM showed a facility kitchen staff in the dishwashing area of the kitchen using their personal cellular phone. Observation of the North resident refrigerator on 01/21/2024 at 12:50 PM showed the following: 1) A half consumed frozen drink without name or date; 2) A box of taquitos opened without seal undated; 3) A bag of cauliflower wings without label; 4) A bag of frozen yellow substance without identifying label, name or date; 5) A bag of fried chicken with the dates 01/17/2024 and 01/20/2024; 6) A bag with a sandwich wrapped in a napkin with dates 01/04/2024 and 01/06/2024; and 7) A paper bag with the dates 01/08/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to maintain a qualified social worker on a fulltime basis. This placed residents at risk of a lack of medically related social services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 9:39 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that Staff D, Social Services, was the only social worker that worked in the facility as the facility was between social workers. Staff A stated that the facility had lacked a fulltime social worker for a month and Staff D would come to the facility a couple of days a week. During an interview on 01/25/2024 at 2:14 PM, Staff D stated that they had been the only social worker for the facility for around a month. Staff D further stated that they did not have enough time to provide all needed social services to the facility's residents. Reference WAC 388-97-0960 (2)(a)(b) .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent prior to psychotropic (affecting the brain) medication usage for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure had the potential for the resident or their legal representatives to have lack of knowledge to make an informed decision regarding use of these medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use Drugs, dated July 2022, showed that residents and/or the resident's representative(s) would be informed of risks and benefits prior to initiation of a psychotropic medication and had the right to decline treatment with the psychotropic medication. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a required assessment tool, dated 06/20/2023, showed Resident 12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). Review of the physician's order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address grievances/concerns raised by the Resident Council group for 3 of 3 months (October 2023, November 2023, and January 2024) when reviewed for Resident Council. Failure for administrative staff to act upon grievances voiced by the Resident Council and failure to report back to the council in writing for a response, rationale and action taken on grievances placed residents at risk for continued concerns, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 01/24/2024 at 9:52 AM, Resident 45, Resident Council President, stated that there had been concerns brought up in the Resident Council (RC) meetings that had not been resolved nor had the RC attendees been updated on the status of the grievances. Resident 45 stated that, most recently, residents had complained about dirty bed linen, long call lights and noisy staff on night shift; however, they were unaware if management had investigated the concerns. Resident 45 stated that when a grievance was investigated it sometimes took…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain or offer assistance in formulating or periodically checking if residents had an advance directive (AD) for 2 of 24 residents (Residents 22 and 65) reviewed for AD. This failure placed the residents at risk to be denied the opportunity to direct their health care if they were to become unable to make decisions or communicate their health care preferences. Findings included . Resident 22 Review of Resident 22's electronic health record (EHR) showed a Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) titled as AD. The EHR did not show documentation of the resident requesting or declining the completion of an AD nor that the facility offered assistance in the development of an AD. Resident 65 Review of Resident 65's EHR showed a POLST titled AD. The EHR did not show documentation of the resident requesting or declining the completion of an AD nor that the facility offered assistance in the development of an AD. During an interview on 01/25/2024 at 10:42 AM, Staff D, Social Services, stated that staff thought the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide clean sheets and/or reasonable care for personal property for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 12, 13, 35, 68 and 86) when reviewed for safe, clean, and comfortable environment. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of personal property, a diminished sense of security, possible infections, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Clean Sheets Observation on 01/25/2024 at 9:52 AM showed Resident 86's flat sheets contained crumbs and several stains. Resident 86 stated that their bed sheets were changed approximately every other week, sometimes longer. Observation and interview on 01/25/2024 at 12:22 PM showed Resident 35 had stains on their flat sheet. Resident 35 stated that bed linen was changed when they got a shower and that when there was COVID on the hall showers were not given. Resident 35 further stated that they had gone two to three weeks without the bed linen changed and would prefer to have it changed once per week. During an interview on 01/26/2024 at 9:37 AM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation on an allegation neglect for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 68) reviewed for accidents and/or incidents. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified neglect and continued exposure to neglect. Findings included . Review of Resident 68's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], showed that the resident admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include left hip pain and osteoarthritis left hip (a joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). During an interview on 01/21/2024 at 1:58 PM, Resident 68 stated that the night shift nurse on 01/19/2024 refused to give them their pain medication stating the medication could only be administered every six hours. Resident 68 stated that they believed the nurse was prejudiced against narcotic use. During an interview on 01/21/2024 at 3:56 PM, the above detailed allegation was reported to Staff A, Administrator (ADM), Staff B,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly notify the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (SLTCO, an advocacy group for residents in a nursing home) or the resident/resident representative of discharges for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 159 and 22) reviewed for hospitalization. These failures placed residents at risk for being inappropriately discharged , lack of access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights, and to ensure that the SLTCO and residnt/ resident representative was aware of facility practices and activities related to transfers and discharges. Findings included . Resident 159 Review of the discharge minimum data set assessment, dated 01/08/2024, showed Resident 159 admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart, lung, kidney disease and diabetes. The MDS and electronic health record (EHR) showed that the resident was discharge on [DATE] to a local hospital with a return to the facility anticipated and was able to make their needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) accurately reflected the current status for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 80 and 88) reviewed for PASRRs. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included . Resident 80 Review of Resident 80's medical diagnosis list showed that the resident had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly) on admission dated 01/27/2023. Review of Resident 80's PASRR, dated 01/27/2023, completed by the facility on the date of admission, showed no mental disorders checked on the form. Review of the physician orders on 01/23/2024 showed that Resident 80 was prescribed a medication related to Schizophrenia to be administered daily. During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 11:04 AM, Staff D, Social Service Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident fall and plan new interventions to decrease the chance of a fall or reduce injury from a fall for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 81) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk for repeated falls, avoidable injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation and interview on 01/22/2024 at 11:07 AM showed Resident 81 had a large lump with a scabbed wound on their forehead. Resident 81 stated that they had fallen and had been taken to the hospital. Review of a 01/06/2024 progress note showed that Resident 81 had fallen, sustained a head hematoma (a large bruise) and laceration (a deep cut) and was sent to the emergency department. Review of Resident 81's 05/15/2023 initiated care plan showed a focus area related to falling. This focus area showed that the most recently implemented intervention was dated 10/31/2023 with all other interventions dated 05/15/2023. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis (a process to remove waste from blood) care consistent with professional standards for one of one resident (Resident 40) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed the resident at risk for adverse health outcomes, inadequate quality of care and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Communication> Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment tool) on 01/24/2024 showed that Resident 40 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include kidney disease. Review of Resident 40's electronic health record (EHR) showed that the resident received dialysis weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review form Hemodialysis Communication Record, dated 01/03/2024, showed missing and/or incomplete information which included missing vital sign information. Communication forms were unable to be located for dialysis dates 01/05/2024, 01/10/2024, 01/15/2024 and 01/17/2024. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed/disposed of in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 medication carts (North Hall medication cart #3) reviewed for Medication Storage. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving expired medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's documentation titled, Medication Labeling and Storage dated February 2023 showed, If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. Observation of the North Hall medication cart #3 with Staff T, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), on 01/21/2024 at 2:01 PM showed that the top drawer had one bottle of vitamin C, 250 milligrams (dietary supplement) expired in December 2023 and a bottle of aspirin, 81 milligrams (used to help prevent heart attacks and strokes) expired in November 2023. During an interview on 01/21/2024 at 2:17 PM, Staff T, LPN, stated that the expired bottles of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 19) reviewed for dental. This failure placed residents at risk for difficulty eating, dental pain, unintended weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a 10/27/2023 dental consultation showed that Resident 19 received a recommendation for full extraction of the lower teeth and new lower denture. Further review showed that Resident 19 was agreeable to this plan. Review of a 11/20/2023 progress note showed that Resident 19 had one to three broken or decayed teeth. During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 10:57 AM, Staff E, Resident Care Manager, stated that dental recommendations were given to the facility's appointment scheduler to have them scheduled. Staff E further stated that the facility's appointment scheduler position had transferred to several people in the previous months. Staff E stated that they were unsure whether Resident 19 had had any follow-up on the 10/27/2023 recommendations. During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 11:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance and follow up on an appointment for dental care services for 1 of 3 resident (Residents 49) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed the residents at potential risk for continued dental problems and decreased the quality of life. Findings included . Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (a required assessment) dated 12/19/2023 showed Resident 49 admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart disease, stroke, hemiplegia (one side of body affected with paralysis), muscle weakness, depression, and anxiety. In addition, the MDS showed the resident was able to make needs known and received hospice services. During an interview on 01/22/2024 at 10:12 AM, Resident 49's family member stated that the resident had lost weight and dentures did not fit well and was supposed to receive new dentures but did not know the status. Review of a document titled, Smile Seattle Dentures, dated 11/03/2022, showed multiple missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely refer a resident to hospice services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 160) reviewed for hospice. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving palliative services, unnecessary pain and suffering, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Resident 160's census showed that the resident admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 09/03/2023. Review of Resident 160's physician's orders showed a referral for hospice services on 08/28/2023. Review of a care conference note dated 08/28/2023 showed that family and facility staff agreed that Resident 160 would be referred for hospice services. During an interview on 01/25/2024 at 9:50 AM, Staff D, Social Services, stated that the social services department would make referrals for hospice services. Staff D further stated that they could not find documentation that Resident 160 was referred for hospice services and this did not meet expectation. Staff D stated that there had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 93 and 98) when reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the residents at a higher risk for contracting influenza and pneumococcal infections, related complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review on 01/24/2024 of Resident 93's electronic health record showed that the resident consented to receive the influenza vaccine on 11/30/2023. Further review showed no vaccine had been ordered or administered. Review on 01/24/2024 of Resident 98's electronic health record showed that the resident consented to receive the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines on 12/21/2024. Further review showed no influenza and pneumococcal vaccines had been ordered or administered. During an interview on 01/25/2024 at 12:14 PM, Staff H, Infection Preventionist, stated that if a resident consented to the influenza or pneumococcal vaccines an order should have been entered into the resident's medical record and the vaccines should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the bed-hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their beds while admitted in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, revised October 2022, showed that all residents or resident representatives were to be provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies which addressed holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). According to the policy, residents regardless of payer source were to be provided written notice about these polices at least twice: well in advance of any transfer; and at the time of transfer (or if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). Resident 1 Review of Resident 1's discharge Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the discharge plan and ensure a safe and orderly discharge for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for discharge planning process. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, medical complications, readmission to the hospital or skilled nursing facility and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, revised December 2016, showed that every resident will be evaluated for his or her discharge needs and will have an individualized post-discharge plan. The discharge plan will include where the individual plans to reside; arrangements that have been made for follow-up care and services; the degree of caregiver/support person availability, capacity, and capability to perform required care; and how the interdisciplinary team will support the resident or representative in the transition to post-discharge care. Review of Resident 2's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services in the management of a surgical wound for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for wound management. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening of the wound, infection, medical complications, additional surgery, rehospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Skin Integrity Management, dated 05/26/2021 showed that the facility was to identify the resident's skin integrity status and the need for prevention or treatment modalities through review of all appropriate assessment information. The facility was expected to perform skin inspection on admission and weekly and perform daily monitoring of wounds or dressings for presence of complications or decline and to document if indicated. The policy and procedure indicated that in the management of surgical wounds, specific orders from the surgeon were to be followed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain 8 hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage to directly supervise resident care, 24 hours a day, seven days a week for 65 of 91 days (from April 2023 through June 2023) reviewed for RN coverage. This failure placed all residents at risk to not have immediate access to assessments, care and services provided by an RN, a delay in care and treatment, unmet care needs and medical complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's daily staffing posting report for April 2023, showed that the facility did not have RN coverage for a minimum of 8 hours a day for 16 of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. Review of the facility's daily staffing posting report for May 2023, showed that the facility did not have RN coverage for a minimum of 8 hours a day for 28 of 31 days reviewed for RN coverage. Review of the facility's daily staffing posting report for June 2023, showed that the facility did not have RN coverage for a minimum of 8 hours a day for 21 of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. In an interview on 10/02/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-02 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the direct care data for registered nurse (RN) hours were accurately entered into the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system for tracking staffing in nursing homes) for 1 of 1 quarter (Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 3rd quarter, April 2023 through June 2023) reviewed for PBJ reporting. This failure caused the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to have inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels which had the potential to impact care and services provided to all the residents in the facility. Findings included . Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report dated FY Quarter 3 2023 (April 1 - June 30) showed that result of No RN hour was not triggered. According to the CASPER report, the definition of triggered was Four or More Days Within the Quarter with no RN Hours. Review of the facility's daily nursing staffing report from April 2023 through June 2023 showed 59 of 91 days had no RN hours. Review of the RN Punch Detail timesheets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-02 · tag F0895 — widespread
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly implement the compliance and ethics program, prevent the submission of data know to be inaccurate and unethical practices for 1of 1 quarter (Fiscal Year Quarter 3, April 2023 through June 2023) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system for tracking staffing in nursing homes) reporting. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the nursing staffing levels and the care and services being provided to all the residents in the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's Compliance Plan revised 10/17/2022, showed that the purpose of the plan was to promote the integrity of the facility's operations, educate staff as to the standards by which they must conduct themselves and to serve as a mechanism for preventing, identifying, and correcting any violation of laws and regulations and/or policy. The guidelines contained in the compliance plan were designed to assist staff in following laws and regulations, to correct violations and to provide guidance in making ethical choices in the work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for indwelling catheter care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment tool) dated 08/15/2023, showed Resident 1 admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement causing difficulty of urination). The MDS further showed that Resident 1 was incontinent of urine. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 08/15/2023 showed that the care area of urinary incontinence required a comprehensive care plan. Review of Resident 1's physician order summary from 08/09/2023 through 08/29/2023, showed that on 08/16/2023 Resident 1 received an order for insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a completed discharge summary that included discharge instructions regarding indwelling urinary catheter (a catheter inserted and kept in the bladder to drain urine) care and follow-up referrals for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed the resident at risk for complications by not receiving the necessary information to ensure continuity of care when discharged to the community. Findings included . Review of Resident 1's electronic health records showed Resident 1 admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 08/29/2023. Review of Resident 1's progress note dated 08/25/2023 at 11:52 AM, showed that a staff from the senior living facility the resident was discharging to, came in to assess Resident 1's discharge needs. According to the progress note, the senior living facility staff advised that if Resident 1's indwelling catheter removal was successful, the resident could go back to the same level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1 & 2) reviewed for care plan revisions. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set, (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 08/07/2023, documented Resident 1 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a delivery ticket dated 08/01/2023 showed the facility received delivery of a scoop mattress for Resident 1. The identified delivery ticket was scanned into the Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 08/01/2023. Review of a Fall Investigation, dated 08/10/2023, showed Resident 1 was observed on the floor with their leg on the bed. Review of the Fall Care Plan, created on 07/17/2023, documented Resident 1 was at risk for falls related to brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention strategies were implemented before a non-injury fall for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure place residents at risk for injuries, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy entitled Fall Management with an effective date of 05/26/2021 states, Patients will be assessed for fall risk as part of the nursing assessment process. Those determined to be at risk will receive appropriate interventions to reduce risk and minimize injury. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fall and seizures. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/07/2023, documented Resident 1 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Fall Risk Assessment in the Nursing Documentation Evaluation, dated 07/17/2023, documented Resident 1 had fall risk indicators identified. A delivery ticket…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$180,646 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $23,273 — penalty dated 2025-10-09
  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-08-20
  • $16,624 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
  • $24,502 — penalty dated 2025-01-23
  • $80,012 — penalty dated 2024-01-26
  • $20,086 — penalty dated 2023-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME 1 of 5Sandia Ridge CenterAlbuquerque, NM

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BQ OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/03/2020
BOLD QUAIL HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/03/2020
NEWGEN LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2020
ROBIN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2020
TRESS, AVROHOMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2020
9560 PICO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2026
PICO AR LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2026
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/03/2020
CALRSON, PAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2023
CHHEDA, NEELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
ROWE, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2023
400 29TH STREET NORTHEAST PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
BQ MASTER TENANT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2026
BQ REALTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
NEWGEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$819K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 7%Other / private 22%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $819K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$351per resident / day
operating cost
$10,685per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505485. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next