Oceanside Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 101.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.48 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record, policy, and interview, the facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with the American Heart Association guidelines and/or the facility's policy for 1 resident in a survey sample of 11 residents who expired at the facility. (Resident identifier is #1.) Findings include: Review on [DATE] of Resident #1's physician orders revealed an order written on [DATE] for full code, meaning CPR is to be initiated in the event their heart or breathing stops. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 Interview on [DATE] at approximately 11:09 a.m. with RN #1 revealed on [DATE] that he/she was assisting with the care of Resident #1 with Licensed Nurse Assistant (LNA) #1. RN #1 further revealed that after assisting with care, LNA #1 said that Resident #1 didn't look right. RN #1 left the room to check the code status and call emergency medical services. RN #1 saw Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 in the hallway he/she asked LPN #1 if they knew how to do CPR because RN #1 felt like Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement water management control measures for hot water tanks, potentially exposing 104 residents to waterborne pathogens. The facility failed to implement policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 6 residents observed for EBP (Resident identifiers are #12 and #32.), The facility failed to implement Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for TBP (Resident identifiers are #62, #109, and #110). The facility failed to perform hand hygiene and use proper glove use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident identifier is #12). Findings include: Review on 1/29/26 of the facility's policy titled, Transmission Based Precautions, revision date 5/1/25, revealed .The Center will use standard approaches, as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for Transmission Based Precautions: Airborne, Contact, and Droplet Precautions.8. Initiating Transmission Based Precautions: 8,1 Nursing staff may place patients with suspected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for 1 resident in a final sample of 21 resident and for 1 of 5 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident Identifiers are #100 and #110.)Findings include:Resident #110 [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614, .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration include right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation and right indication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents have the appropriate equipment to prevent a decrease on Range of Motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Limited ROM in a final sample of 22 residents. (Resident identifier is #76.)Findings include: Observation on 1/27/2026 at approximately 1:53 p.m. at Resident #76's room revealed that Resident #76 was sitting in bed with their right hand clenched in a fist. Further observation revealed no hand splints or positioning devices on Resident #76's right hand or in their room. Interview on 1/27/26 at approximately 1:53 p.m. with Resident #76 revealed that he/she had a stroke and cannot move their right upper extremity. Resident #76 also revealed that he/she does not use a hand splint or positioning device for their right hand. Interview on 1/29/26 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Staff J (Registered Nurse) revealed that Resident #76 does not currently have a hand splint, but they did before. Review on 1/29/26 of Resident #76's care plan, initiated date of 8/25/23, revealed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to arrange for the provision of rehabilitative services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitation in a final sample of 22 residents. (Resident identifier is #25.) Findings include:Interview on 1/27/26 at approximately 10:42 a.m. with Resident #25 revealed that he/she was receiving injections for contractures and was told that he/she would have therapy after the injections. Resident #25 further revealed that he/she has not received therapy following his/her most recent injection.Review on 1/27/26 of Resident #25's care plan meeting note, dated 12/30/25, revealed that Resident #25 would be re-evaluated by PT/OT (Physical Therapy/Occupational Therapy) after his/her Botox injection.Review on 1/27/26 of Resident #25's consultation report, dated 1/15/26, revealed that Resident #25 was seen for left spastic hemiplegia. Further review revealed recommendations for Dysport (Botox) injections every three months and physical therapy to address range of motion, standing, stretching, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievances from Resident Council were acted upon (Resident identifiers are #16, #21, and #99). Findings include: Review on 12/16/24 of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 8/19/24, facilitated by Staff E (Regional Activities Director), in the section titled Dietary, revealed: Residents are concerned snacks aren't consistently available when they ask for them. Interview on 12/16/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Resident Council (13 residents attended the group meeting) revealed that they had a food committee and no changes ever happen after they voice their concerns about snacks. Interview on 12/18/24 at 8:00 a.m. with Resident #99 revealed that he/she was not provided snacks when they would like at bedtime. Interview on 12/18/24 at approximately 9:07 a.m. with Resident #16 revealed snacks were not always available. Resident #16 also stated that on the evening of 12/15/24, he/she requested a cookie, which was unavailable, and that the staff left without offering an alternative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the provider reviewed irregularities identified by the pharmacist during the monthly Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) timely for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident Identifier #62). Findings include: Review on 12/18/24 of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, dated 1/24, revealed: .The nurse care center follows up on the recommendations should be acted upon within 30 calendar days or per facility specific protocols. a. For those issues that required physician intervention, the attending physician either accepts and acts upon the report and recommendations or rejects all or some of the report and should document his or her rationale of why the recommendations is rejected in the resident's record . Review on 12/18/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m. of Resident # 62's Pharmacy MRR, dated 8/22/24, revealed a recommendation to adjust the total daily dose of Gabapentin to stay within recommended dosing guidelines. Further review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the established smoking policy for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for smoking in a final sample of 23 residents (Resident Identifier #92). Findings include: Review on 12/18/24 of the facility's policy titled, OPS137 Smoking, revision date 5/01/24, revealed: Policy .Patients/Residents will be assessed on admission, quarterly, and with change in condition for the ability to smoke safely . Review on 12/18/24 of Resident #92's medical record revealed that Resident #92 was a smoker. Further review of the medical record revealed that the most recent smoking assessment was a smoking evaluation on 6/17/24. Interview on 12/18/24 at 11:00 am with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings. Interview with Staff A confirmed that smoking evaluations were completed upon admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition. Staff A stated that Resident #92 was due for a quarterly smoking evaluation to be completed in September of 2024.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision when a door alarm sounded resulting in a resident elopement for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident Identifier #1). Findings include: Interview on 8/23/24 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Staff C (Administrator) revealed that on 7/28/24, Resident #1 left the premises through the front door with a wanderguard on. The door alarm sounded and was deactivated by Staff B (Recreational Assistant) at approximately 5:15 p.m. Staff were looking for Resident #1 to go out on a smoking break around 6:30 and Staff D (Licensed Nursing Assistant) reported that he/she had seen the resident at a nearby gas station. Interview on 8/23/24 at approximately 10:30 a.m. with Staff A (Nurse Practice Educator) revealed he/she was on-call the evening of 7/28/24 and learned of the elopement at approximately 6:30 p.m. The facility discovered that Resident #1 took a taxi from the gas station to a homeless shelter approximately an hour away. The police department and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers had necessary treatment and services, which includes documentation of weekly assessments that contained measurements and descriptions of the pressure ulcer and treatment orders, for pressure ulcers for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident Identifiers are #1 and #2). Findings include: Resident #1 Interview on 7/2/24 at approximately 8:45 a.m. with Resident #1 revealed Resident #1 had wounds to their bottom and their heels. Review on 7/2/24 Resident #1's medical record revealed a clinical admission note dated 6/25/24 that stated: .Skin note: Skin issues noted. Coccyx open area and bilateral back heels black . Further review of the medical record revealed that there were no treatment orders for the above identified pressure injuries until 6/29/24. Review on 7/2/24 of Resident #1's Skin and Wound section of Resident #1's medical record revealed that there were no descriptions or assessments of wounds. Interview on 7/2/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices in regards to hand hygiene, changing gloves and cleaning equipment during pressure ulcer care in 1 out of 1 observations of pressure ulcer care observed (Resident Identifier #2). Findings include: Review on 7/2/24 of Resident #2's Skin and Wound Evaluation, dated 6/26/24, revealed that Resident #2 had a Stage 3 Pressure Injury to the left heel, measuring 5.1 by 2.8 centimeters. Review on 7/2/24 of Resident #2's July 2024 Treatment Administration Record revealed the following treatment orders: Wound care: left heel: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Betadine to eschar area, allow to dry, cover with ABD [Abdominal] Pad and secure with Kerlix [gauze wrap] every day, with a start date of 6/14/24. Observation on 7/2/24 at approximately 9:45 a.m. of Staff C (Registered Nurse) providing wound care to Resident #2's left heel area revealed the following: Staff C donned a protective gown but did not tie it at the waist, which allowed for the ties to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,521 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,521 — penalty dated 2023-12-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH