No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pocahontas Center

5 Everett Tibbs Road, Marlinton, WV 24954 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (304) 799-7375 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20243 immediate-jeopardy citations$193,892 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $193,892 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
603 9th St · (304) 799-6200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.4 mi
19258 Seneca Trl · (304) 799-6617 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
916 3rd Ave · (304) 799-6336 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.5%14.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.6%15.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.3%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%79.4%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.191.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.131.841.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.1%CMS range 30.7–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.2–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
63.8%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 61.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-05)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-17 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation. and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was served liquid in a form which met his individualized needs. Resident # 8 was ordered and care planned to receive nectar thickened liquids however during the noon time meal on 12/16/25 the resident was served regular consistency milk and regular consistency coffee. The resident did drink the thin liquids and experienced coughing. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #8. The State Agency (SA) determined the facility's failure to serve Resident #8 with nectar thickened liquids place him at immediate risk for serious harm and/or death. Consuming thin liquids when you have been assessed to need a thicker consistency can create an immediate risk for choking, aspiration, and/or death. The facility was notified of the immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 1:41 pm on 12/16/25. The facility's plan of correction (POC) was accepted at 2:35 pm on 12/16/25. Once the steps contained in the plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #46 was transferred to from her geri chair to her bed in a manner which was not safe for her. Resident #46 was found to be totally dependent on staff for transfers. The staff were to utilize a total mechanical lift to transfer the resident from the chair to the bed and from the bed to the chair. Two (2) nurse aides were observed taking Resident #46 into her room. The surveyor stood outside the resident door and kept the room under constant sight. When the nurse aides emerged from the room the resident was in the bed. When asked how they transferred the Nurse Aide, stated I stood her up and pivoted her to bed. She confirmed she did not use a lift and no lift was observed in the room. This failure placed Resident #41 in an immediate risk for serious harm and or death. The state agency notified the facility of the immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse from other residents. Beginning on 04/19/23 Resident #20 began displaying physical, verbal and sexually abusive behaviors towards residents and staff. A review of the record found at least 20 noted incidents of such behavior. The abusive behavior was not consistently reported as required, the physician and responsible party was not consistently notified, the victims were not consistently identified, and interventions were not consistently put into place to prevent the abuse from reoccurring. Resident #20 still currently resides at the facility and has had documented episodes of said behaviors as recent as 07/05/24. The State Agency (SA) determined this put more than a limited number of Residents currently residing in the facility at risk for immediate serious harm and/or death and constitutes an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was notified of the IJ at 2:09 PM on 07/30/24. The abatement plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician and responsible party of a significant change when resident attempted elopement from the facility. This was found while investigating a complaint. Resident identifier: #48. Facility Census: 62.Findings Included:a) Review of documents including resident's progress notes, care plan and incident report log had no record of resident's attempted elopement, contact to resident's physician or Resident #48's responsible party.b) Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse # 46 on 02/02/26 at 12:19 PM, acknowledged the incident occurred and that she reported it to her Director of Nursing. c) Interview with Director of Nursing #40 on 02/02/26 at 3:19 PM who acknowledged the attempted elopement occurred on 01/17/26. When asked for documentation of notification of incident to physician and responsible party or any progress notes pertaining to the incident she stated we don't have any records of notifying.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff across all shifts. This was true for 18 of 45 days reviewed under the care area of staffing. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include: a) Staffing On 09/30/2025 at 2:00 PM, 45 daily nurse staff postings were reviewed. The minimum staffing requirement is 2.25. The review found the following days did not meet the minimum of nursing hours per patient days (NHPPD): 09/21/24 2.1104/19/24 2.0904/20/25 2.2005/17/25 2.2005/24/25 1.4805/25/25 2.1505/31/25 2.1806/01/25 1.8806/07/25 1.6406/21/25 1.8206/22/25 2.0106/23/25 1.9506/25/25 2.2106/27/25 2.0806/28/25 1.9306/29/25 2.0706/30/25 2.2007/05/25 2.05 On 09/30/25 at 4:40 PM, the Administrator and the Regulatory Compliance Advisor #73 confirmed the minimum NHPPD were not met.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete daily staff postings. This was true for four (4) of 45 daily staff postings reviewed. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include: a) Daily Staff Postings On 09/30/2025 at 2:00 PM, a review of daily staff postings was completed. The following days did not include the census: --05/10/25 day shift, evening shift, night shift--05/22/25 day shift, evening shift, night shift --06/06/25 day shift, evening shift, night shift--06/24/25 night shift On 09/30/25 at 4:40 PM, the Administrator and Regulatory Compliance Advisor #73 confirmed the daily staff postings did not list the census number.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents knew where the ombudsman's contact information was posted and the residents were informed of their right to formally complain to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) about the care they are receiving. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 59.Findings included: The facility's Policy and Procedures for Grievances/Concern stated that the resident has the right to voice grievances to the Center or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. On 09/24/2025 at 01:45 PM, a Resident Council Meeting was held. The residents reported they did not know the Ombudsman's name or where to obtain the contact information Resident #41 (a spokesperson for the council) reported she should know who is the Ombudsman but did not. The residents also reported the did not know where they could find the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living for dependent residents, #6 and #11. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living. Resident Identifiers: #6 and #11. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include:a) Resident #6On 09/24/25 at 9:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #6. The review of showers was from 08/24/25 through 09/24/25. The care plan indicated the resident was dependent for showers. The following showers were documented for 08/24/25 through 08/31/25:--08/29/25--08/30/25 The resident did not have a shower for five (5) days between 08/24/25 through 08/29/25. There were no refusals documented within this timeframe.The following showers were documented from 09/02/25 through 09/11/25. There were no refusals documented within this timeframe.--09/02/25--09/11/25 The resident did not have a shower for nine (9) days. On 09/24/25 at 2:20 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the dependent resident did not receive showers within an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was signed by a resident's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA), a Beneficiary Notification Review was signed by a resident's Health Care Surrogate (HCS), accurate documentation was charted in the patient's medical record for a resident without an amputation and a correct diagnosis for a resident's medication. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of resident's. Resident Identifiers: #60, #70, #71 and #5. Facility Census: 59.Findings included: a) Resident #60's POST form was not signed. The Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form stated the signature is required. The POST form was dated beside the signature space, but no signature was obtained. On 09/25/2025 at 11:33 AM, Corporate Registered Nurse #72 confirmed the POST form was not signed. b) Resident #70's Beneficiary Notification Review form was not completed. On 02/21/25, the resident's Beneficiary Notification was delivered telephonically on 02/21/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly and accurately explain the binding arbitration agreement. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 59. Findings Included: a) The facility's Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreement stated the agreement waives the resident's right to trial in court by judge or jury. Arbitration is a complete substitute for a trial by jury as stated in the facility's agreement. b) On 09/29/2025 at 01:28 PM, the Administrator was interviewed concerning the arbitration agreement. The Administrator reported it was fully voluntary and you had thirty (30) days to change your mind. The administrator stated we have mediation before you go to trial. When asked if the resident/family can sue or go to trial once an arbitration agreement is signed, the Administrator answered, Yes. c) On 09/29/2025 at 12:39 PM, the following resident statements were obtained concerning the signed arbitration agreement:Resident #20 was able to answer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified experience for Resident #21 while receiving medical care at the nurses' station, a sleeping experience for Resident #46. This was true for one (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of accidents for Resident #21 and random opportunities for discovery for Resident #46. Resident Identifiers: #21 and #46. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include: a) Resident #21 On 09/29/25 at 1:30 PM, a review of an anonymous complaint dated 07/05/25 was completed. The review found the resident had sustained an unwitnessed fall which resulted in a laceration to the back of the head with a large hematoma. A change in condition was completed on 07/02/25 at 6:17 AM. The facility physician was notified and advised the staff he would be coming to the facility to evaluate the laceration and hematoma. The facility physician administered three ccs (cubic centimeters) of lidocaine and placed six staples in the resident's head at the nurses' station. The following progress notes verify the procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Facility Failed to ensure resident was invited to participate in care planning for his own care. Resident #1009/23/2025 2:41 PM Resident reported he is not invited to his care plan meetings and he has never attended them. 10/24/2025 4:01 PMInterview with Social Worker who reported resident #10 does not receive invites to his care plan meetings. She had no documentation that he was notified of the meetings or that he attended. She stated he does not like to leave his room often. She stated his Medical Power of Attorney is invited but does not attend and does not respond.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment for Resident #46. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #46. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include:a) Resident #46On 11/04/25 at approximately1:30 PM, an observation was made of Resident #46's night stand. The night stand had the wood peeled off, exposing particle board.On 11/04/25 at 3:10 PM, Regulatory Compliance Advisor #73 confirmed the wood had peeled off the night stand exposing particle board. Regulatory Compliance Advisor #73 stated, we will get a new one.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an incident was reported for a resident who obtained a hematoma to the head following a transfer with a lift requiring staff education. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #37. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Abuse Prohibition stated, Neglect is defined as the failure, indifference, or disregard of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide care, comfort, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. b) During a Facility Reported Incident investigation, Resident #37's care plan was reviewed. The care plan stated, Resident sustained a hematoma to head (left near top) during transfer using the full body mechanical lift (the bar hit her head). Policy being followed with two-person assist. c) A Facility Reported Incident was not completed, however staff education was completed for a transfer involving a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was completed accurately and thoroughly for a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) for an allegation of abuse. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #29. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: The FRI summary stated Resident #29 was referred to as [NAME] (not the resident's real name) and was capacitated. The resident was deemed incapacitated by the facility's physician on 12/22/24. The resident's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a three (3) on 08/01/2025. The resident's BIMS was completed on 08/03/2025 per documentation on the resident's medical record. On 09/30/2025 at 10:45 AM , Corporate Registered Nurse #72 stated that it was an error and that they (the facility) had complete multiple FRI's. The incorrect BIMS date, capacity statement discrepancies and documentation on the reportable with incorrect name were confirmed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed ensure Resident #71 was permitted to return to the facility after hospitalization. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of Discharges. Resident Identifier: #71. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include:a) Resident #71On 11/03/25 at approximately 9:15 AM, a complaint was reviewed regarding Resident #71 being denied readmission after a hospitalization due to behaviors, a urinary tract infection and severe dehydration. The resident was sent to an acute care facility on 09/12/25. Based on the hospital history and physicaldated 09/18/25 at 10:27 AM, the resident was admitted to a medical unit until a bed became available on the psychiatric unit. The resident continued to have behaviors after intravenous fluids (IVFs) and an antibiotic had been administered. The resident was then admitted to the psychiatric unit on 09/18/25 for further stabilization. Following admission to Psychiatry, the resident expressed concern that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #9 regarding hospice care. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of hospice. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include: a) Resident #9 On 09/24/25 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #9. The review found the MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/30/25. The resident was placed under hospice care on 07/23/25. However, the MDS section O K1., hospice care was marked no for receiving hospice care. On 09/24/25 at 11:06 AM, the Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #72 confirmed the MDS was incorrect.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a complete and accurate care plan for Resident #9. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of hospice care. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include:a) Resident #9On 09/24/25 at 8:55 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #9. The review found the care plan had not been developed completely under multiple focus areas, goals and interventions. The following areas of the care plan were left blank:--Under the focus area of resistive to care related to cognitive loss/dementia, the intervention observe for pain. Attempt non-pharmacologic interventions to alleviate pain (blank) and document effectiveness. Administer pain medications as ordered and document effectiveness/side effects.--Under the focus area of at risk for decreased abilit to per ADLs (activities of daily living( (blank) related to (blank) chronic disease/condition: (specify disease or condition: (blank) Other: (blank).--Under the focus area of hospice, the goal states, Pt/Resident will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to input a physician's order for Resident #9 regarding hospice services and follow physician's orders for Resident #26 and #27 regarding late medication. This was true for three (3) of 20 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #9, #26 and #27. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include:a) Resident #9On 09/24/25 at approximately 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #9. The review found the resident was placed under hospice services on 07/31/25. However, a physician's order was not input until 09/24/25. On 09/24/25 at 1:30 PM, Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #72 confirmed the resident was under hospice services as of 07/31/25 and the physician's order was input on 09/24/25.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aide performance reviews were completed annually. This was true for three (3) of five (5) nurse aides' annual performance reviews during the survey process. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include: a) Performance Review On 09/30/25 at 3:45 PM, a review of the five (5) nurse aides (Nas) performance reviews was completed. The review found three (3) of the five (5) performance reviews were not completed. The following were incomplete: --NA #50 due 09/18/25--NA #46 due 06/27/25--NA #38 due 07/25/25 On 09/30/25 at 4:40 PM, the Administrator and the Regulatory Compliance Advisor #73 confirmed the performance reviews were not completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing and palatable temperature for Resident #46. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #46. Resident Identifier: 46. Facility Census: 59. On 11/03/25 at 12:44 PM an observation of Resident #46 found the resident was in her bed with her head at the foot of the bed and the bed wedge was kicked out to the side of her bed. Nurse Aide #35 was asked how much the resident had eaten she stated, I dont know I was not the one who feed her. She said, let me see. She then was asked if her dirty tray was on the cart on the hall, she said no we do not put the dirty ones back on that cart we put them somewhere different. She then opened the cart and stated, Oh she hasn't been feed yet and neither has her roommate. She stated, I will feed her now. The surveyor then asked her to get the dietary manager to test the temperature of the tray and to request a new tray for the resident from the kitchen. A quick tour of the hallway found no other residents were being assisted with their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program during medication administration for Resident #19. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of medication administration. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include: a) Resident #19 On 11/04/25 at 8:24 AM, medication administration completed by Graduate Practical Nurse (GPN) #14 for Resident #19. While preparing the medication for administration, GPN #14 touched the medication cart trash can lid two times. GPN #14 did not complete hand hygiene after touching the medication cart trash can lid two times. On 11/04/25 at 9:10 AM, GPN #14 confirmed hand hygiene should have been completed after touching the trash can lid. On 11/04/25 at 9:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. The DON confirmed hand hygiene should have been completed after touching the trash can lid.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment of which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. The facility failed to maintain the dryer in a safe manner. This failed practice has the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Facility On 08/01/24 at 9:40 AM, an observation of the laundry room was conducted. While observing the lint traps in the facility dryers they were noted to full and had overflowed with lint into the floor. On 08/01/24 at approximately 9:50 AM, a review of the facility Environmental Services Operations Manual section Laundry Operations was performed. During this review the section of the manual entitled Lint Screens stated lint screens must be brushed and cleaned after every load or every hour. In addition the section, Lint Screens states that if these lint screens are not brushed and cleaned as stated above the screen will become packed with lint and that when this occurs, the warm air moving through the system is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to have Registered Nurse coverage for eight (8) consecutive hours daily. This was discovered through the long term care survey process and has the potentios to affect all residents currently resding in the facility. Facility Census: 67. Findings Include: a) No RN coverage. During a review of the staffing posting forms on 07/29/24 at approximately 6:30 PM the following staffing form for 03/18/23 did not have an RN on staff for the day. It was further observed that 04/09/23 had only 7.83 of the required eight (8) hours of RN coverage. During an interview with the Scheduler #88 on 07/30/24 at approximately 8:55 AM she agreed, there was no RN coverage for 03/18/23 and only 7.83 of the required eight (8) hours for 04/09/24.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete staff evaluations. This was true for one (1) of five (5) staff evaluations reviewed during the long term care process. Identifier: Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) # 61. Facility Census: 67. Findings Included: a) CNA #61 During a record review of the CNA's evaluation it is identified that CNA #61 was hired on 05/09/24 and the evaluation was completed by the DON on 06/27/24. However a small yellow post-it note was identified to be covering the signature line for CNA #61 and it stated (typed as written) employee missed to go over review with the [DON name] During an interview with the Scheduler #88, she agreed that the evaluation was incomplete and should have been completed with the staff member when she had returned to the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed identify the required Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)/nursing competencies to meet the resident populations care needs. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the CNA/nursing competency review of the long term care survey process. This had the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 67. Findings Include: a) Facility assessment During a review of the facility assessment on 08/31/24 at approximately 10:30 AM it was identified the facility centered care areas of the resident population is outlined. It is further identified on page 20 of 43 of the facility assessment, under II. Staffing, Training, Services and Personnel that the required nursing competencies to meet the resident population care needs is outlined and under this header (typed as written) Staff Training/Competencies/Skill Sets each category/subcategory listed is marked as sufficient. During an interview with the Person in Charge (PIC) and an assisting Administrator #89 on 07/31/24 at approximately 8:36 AM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement the policy and procedure entitled, Abuse Prohibition. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #62. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #20 On 07/29/24 at approximately 3:15 PM, a review of the facility reported incidents (FRI), it was discovered a FRI had been submitted for Resident #22. During the review of this FRI, it was noted on 07/02/24 at 6:15 PM, Resident #20 was witnessed grabbing Resident #22's breast. Nurse Aide (NA) #62 and NA #40 witnessed the incident, separated and redirected the residents, and immediately reported the incident to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20. A review of the FRI revealed the following 5 (five) day was submitted as a summary of the incident and read as follows: On July 2, 2024 at approximately 6:15 PM, Resident #20 was witnessed grabbing Resident #22's breast. NA #62 and NA #40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to report to the appropriate state agencies as listed in the policy and procedure entitled, Abuse Prohibition. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #62. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #20 On 07/29/24 at approximately 3:15 PM, a review of the facility reported incidents (FRI), it was discovered a FRI had been submitted for Resident #22. During the review of this FRI, it was noted on 07/02/24 at 6:15 PM, Resident #20 was witnessed grabbing Resident #22's breast. Nurse Aide (NA) #62 and NA #40 witnessed the incident, separated and redirected the residents, and immediately reported the incident to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20. A review of the FRI revealed the following 5 (five) day was submitted as a summary of the incident and read as follows: On July 2, 2024 at approximately 6:15 PM, Resident #20 was witnessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to imvestigate allegations of abuse as listed in the policy and procedure entitled, Abuse Prohibition. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #62. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #20 On 07/29/24 at approximately 3:15 PM, a review of the facility reported incidents (FRI), it was discovered a FRI had been submitted for Resident #22. During the review of this FRI, it was noted on 07/02/24 at 6:15 PM, Resident #20 was witnessed grabbing Resident #22's breast. Nurse Aide (NA) #62 and NA #40 witnessed the incident, separated and redirected the residents, and immediately reported the incident to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20. A review of the FRI revealed the following 5 (five) day was submitted as a summary of the incident and read as follows: On July 2, 2024 at approximately 6:15 PM, Resident #20 was witnessed grabbing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to act in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in accordance with expired medical supplies. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing at the facility. Facility Census: 67 Findings include: a) On [DATE] at 8:46 AM observation of the medication/supply storage room found two (2) boxes of [NAME] (BD) Blood Transfer Devices (50 in each box) with an expiration date of 2011-04. b) On [DATE] at 8:46 AM observation of the medication/supply room found twenty (20) urinary catheters which have a past expiration date. Expired urinary catheters (20) 20 French 30 milliliter expired [DATE] 16 French 30 milliliter expired [DATE] X 2 20 French 30 milliliter expired [DATE] 20 French 30 milliliter expired [DATE] 22 French 30 milliliter expired [DATE] X 2 22 French 20 milliliter expired [DATE] 16 French 10 milliliter expired [DATE] X 10 22 French 5 milliliter 2 way expired [DATE] 22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to prevent infections through indirect contact transmission by storing clean resident clothing in the chemical closet of the laundry room. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Facility On 08/01/24 at 9:40 AM, an observation of the laundry room was conducted which revealed several items of personal resident clothing to be hanging in the chemical closet, which was located on the dirty side of the laundry room where soiled linen is brought to for laundering. These personal resident clothing items were in direct contact with the Rapid Multi-Surface Cleaner, this cleaner was confirmed to be used for the mops in the facility by Employee #72. In addition, this cleaning solution was noted to be stored on the floor. At this time, an interview was conducted with Employee #72 who stated she hangs personal resident clothing in this closet after the clothing is laundered and is is not labeled and not able to be directly delivered to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for a resident while assisting them to eat. This was a random opportunity of discovery during the long term care survey process and was true for Resident #7. Resident Identifier: #7. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #7 On 07/29/24 at 1:56 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #26 was observed standing over Resident #7 on the left side of the resident's bed as she was assisting him to eat. It was observed Resident #7 had a laptop sitting on the over the bed table along with his dinner tray. It was further observed there was an empty chair available to use sitting at the right side of the bed. On 07/29/24 at approximately 1:55 PM, during an interview with Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator Registered Nurse (CRC RN) #32 she stated RN #26 is new and should not be doing that. On 07/29/24 at approximately 1:57 PM, during an interview with RN #26 she agreed she should not be standing over the resident but was concerned with his computer being on the over the bed table with the dinner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #60 had documentation related to the provision of information provided to Resident #60 and/or Resident #60's representative related to advanced directives. This was true for 1 (one) of 7 (seven) residents reviewed in the Long Term Survey Process. Resident identifier: Resident #60. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #60 On 07/29/24 at 11:47 AM, a record review was conducted for Resident #60 revealing the absence of an Advanced Directive. On 07/31/24 at 4:24 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee #33. At this time, Employee #33 acknowledged no documentation was present to show Resident #60 and/or Resident #60's representative had been provided information related to implementing an Advanced Directive and the facility did not have documentation of an Advanced Directive for Resident #60. Employee #33 stated a call had been placed to Resident #60's representative and Resident #60's representative wanted Resident #60 to remain a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) at this time. In addition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide the Resident the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Resident Identifier: Room #A1-1 and B9-1. Facility Census: 67 Findings Include: a) Room A1-1 On 07/29/24 at 9:56 AM, it was observed that room A1-1 had two (2) soiled privacy curtains in the room. One had a brown substance on it and the other had a brown substance and red spots. On 07/30/24 at 10:21 AM, it was observed and noted that the curtains were still in the room. This was confirmed with Registered Nurse #28 and Corporate Clinical Lead on 07/30/24 at 10:03 AM. b) Unit B room [ROOM NUMBER] A During a tour of the facility on 07/29/24 at approximately 9:08 AM of Unit B, the bed side night stand for room [ROOM NUMBER] A was observed to have one third (1/3) of the top surface laminate to be torn off leaving rough edges and the underneath particle board exposed. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #28 on 07/29/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, RN #28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to notify to the ombudsman of a resident transfer/discharge to the hospital. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #68. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #68 During a medical record review for Resident #68 on 07/30/24 at 7:30 AM it was identified the resident had a change in condition for abnormal vital signs and an order was received to transfer the resident out to the hospital on [DATE]. With further review of the medical record a notification to the Ombudsman was not found During an interview with the facility Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator #32 on 07/31/24 at approximately 9:30 AM the CRC stated, the Ombudsman notification was a responsibility of the Social Worker who is out on medical leave. CRC #32 stated, this notification was not completed. She further stated she would reach out to the Ombudsman and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to notify resident representatives of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer/discharge. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for transfers/discharges during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #68 and Resident #51. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #68 During a medical record review for Resident #68 on 07/30/24 at 7:30 AM it was identified the resident had a change in condition for abnormal vital signs and an order was received to transfer the resident out to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record found the record was void of a bed hold notification to the medical power of attorney (MPOA) for this discharge. During an interview with the facility admission Director (AD) #36 on 07/30/24 at 3:47 PM, the AD stated the bed hold notification had not been completed with this transfer and further stated it should have been but did not know why it wasn't.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to coordinate with the appropriate State-designated authority, to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs when completing/revising a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR). This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents who had their PASSR's reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: 57, 43, 16. Facility Census: 67. Findings Include: a) Resident #57 On 07/30/24 at 11:00 AM record review found Resident #57 had the following medical diagnosis: Schizoeffective Disorder Bipolar Type Onset 06/18/24 Unspecified Dementia Onset 10/06/23 Unspecified Psychosis Onset 10/06/23 Delirium Onset 06/18/24 Major Depressive Disorder Onset 10/06/23 Anxiety Disorder Onset 12/26/23 Review of the PASSR dated 06/13/24 found that the following medical diagnosis were not identified on the PASSR. Schizoeffective Disorder Bipolar Type Onset 06/18/24 Delirium Onset…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to monitor potential triggers for a resident diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident's reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: Resident #16. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #16 On 07/30/24 at approximately 9:00 AM, a review of Resident #16's medical record was conducted. During this review, Resident #16 was noted to have the following diagnoses: 1. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic. Dated: 03/20/24. 2. Unspecified Dementia, mild with other behavioral disturbance. Dated: 03/20/24. 3. Schizoaffective Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 4. Bipolar Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 5. Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. In addition, Resident #16 was noted to be receiving the following psychotropic medication: 1. Fluphenazine 2.5 milligrams (MG). Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth three times a day for schizoaffective disorder. 2. Seroquel 200 mg. Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise care plan to be resident specific when the residents care needs changed. This was true for two (2) of 23 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #25 and #44. Facility Census: 67 Findings Include: a) Resident #25 On 07/31/24 at 2:58 PM record review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #25 found that it had not been revised when they no longer was insulin dependent. The care plan (created on 11/16/23) focus for diabetes states Resident #25 is insulin dependent when in fact her Lantus insulin was discontinued on 07/25/24. This was confirmed with the Corporate Clinical Lead #75 on 07/31/24 at 3:30 PM who agreed the care plan should have been revised accordingly. b) Resident #44 On 07/29/24 at 9:45 AM observation shows Resident #44 is a frail, small resident. She is unable to speak loud enough to be heard. She is laying in a fetal position with contractures observed. On 07/30/24 at 1:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow Physician orders related to reporting elevated blood glucose levels. This was a random oppurtunity for discovery and was true for Resident #25. Resident Identifier: #25 Facility Census: 67 Findings Include: a) Resident #25 On 07/31/24 at 4:16 PM record review found, Resident #25 has the following orders: Monitor blood sugars twice weekly at 6:30 am. Notify Physician if less than (<) 60 or greater than (>)300 one time a day every Wednesday and Sunday for signs and symptoms of hyper or hypo glycemia diaphoresis changes of level of conscience. Documentation shows the following dates the blood glucose was out of range and not reported to the physician as ordered. 04/23/24 309 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl 04/24/24 345 mg/dl 04/25/24 306 mg/dl 04/26/24 349 mg/dl The above information was confirmed on 08/01/24 at 9:00 AM with Corporate Clinical Lead #75 who agreed all of the elevated blood glucose levels should have been reported to the Physician. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder received timely appropriate incontinence care. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) residents reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifer: Resident #60. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #60 On 07/29/24 at 9:17 AM, an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #60. At this time Resident #60 indicated he was incontinent, stating Somebody was supposed to come clean me up, but I don't know how long before she gets here. This Surveyor asked Resident #60 if he had used his call bell to alert staff incontinence care was needed. Resident #60 stated he had, and some staff came in an turned it off and told me they would be back after the lunch trays were picked up At this time, this Surveyor walked out of Resident #60's room and spoke with Employee #43 who was outside of Resident #60's room. This Surveyor asked Employee #43 if she was taking care of Resident #60 to which Employee #43 acknowledged she was. This Surveyor informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to monitor potential triggers for a resident diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident's reviewed for truama informed care during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: Resident #16. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #16 On 07/30/24 at approximately 9:00 AM, a review of Resident #16's medical record was conducted. During this review, Resident #16 was noted to have the following diagnoses: 1. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic. Dated: 03/20/24. 2. Unspecified Dementia, mild with other behavioral disturbance. Dated: 03/20/24. 3. Schizoaffective Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 4. Bipolar Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 5. Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. In addition, Resident #16 was noted to be receiving the following psychotropic medication: 1. Fluphenazine 2.5 milligrams (MG). Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth three times a day for schizoaffective disorder. 2. Seroquel 200 mg. Give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to provide medically necessary social services in the area of discharge planning and appointment of a healthcare decision maker. This was a random opportunity for discovery and true for resident #62 and #48. Facility Census: 67. Finding include: a) Resident #62 On 07/29/24 at 10:09 AM, an interview with Resident #62 was conducted. During this interview Resident #62, stated she hoped to go home. She states, she has capacity and is able to care for herself but she needs help finding a place to live. Resident states, the Social Worker has been out for a couple of months. Her last rental home had the heat out, water lines busted and she us unable to go back there. She states, she is [AGE] years old and would like to reside near her family. Resident stated she has been here since February when her ammonia levels where really high and the facility helped to save her life but now she is able to take care of herself, she would like to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to monitor behaviors for a resident receiving psychotropic medication. This was true for 1 (one) of five (5) resident's reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: Resident #16. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #16 On 07/30/24 at approximately 9:00 AM, a review of Resident #16's medical record was conducted. During this review, Resident #16 was noted to have the following diagnoses: 1. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic. Dated: 03/20/24. 2. Unspecified Dementia, mild with other behavioral disturbance. Dated: 03/20/24. 3. Schizoaffective Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 4. Bipolar Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 5. Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. In addition, Resident #16 was noted to be receiving the following psychotropic medication: 1. Fluphenazine 2.5 milligrams (MG). Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth three times a day for schizoaffective disorder. 2. Seroquel 200 mg. Give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #16's medical record was complete and accurate. This was true for 1 (one) of 23 sampled residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process.Resident identifier: Resident #16. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Resident #16 On 07/30/24 at approximately 09:00 AM, a review of Resident #16's medical record was conducted. During this review, Resident #16 was noted to have the following diagnoses: 1. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic. Dated: 03/20/24. 2. Unspecified Dementia, mild with other behavioral disturbance. Dated: 03/20/24. 3. Schizoaffective Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 4. Bipolar Disorder, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. 5. Major Depressive Disorder, single episode, unspecified. Dated: 03/20/24. In addition, Resident #16 was noted to be receiving the following psychotropic medication: 1. Fluphenazine 2.5 milligrams (MG). Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth three times a day for schizoaffective disorder. 2. Seroquel 200 mg. Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth at bedtime for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that food was served to residents at a palatable temperature. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 66. Findings included: a.) Resident Interview On 08/29/23 at 10:57 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #19, who stated that food in the facility was not served at the correct temperature. b.) Observation On 08/29/23 at 1:09 PM, lunch trays arrived in the dining room on a cart, and staff began serving residents. At 1:11 PM a tray was selected at random, removed from the cart, and brought to the kitchen, at which time a staff member was requested to test the temperature of each food on the tray with a thermometer. Dietary Employee #55 arrived immediately to test the food temperatures. The tray contained a taco, rice, and pudding. The taco was 129.5 degrees Fahrenheit, the rice was 130.1 degrees Fahrenheit, and the pudding was 68.1 degrees Fahrenheit. c.) Staff Interview At the time the food temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain their kitchen and dry storage room in a safe and sanitary manner when they failed to label foods with opened dates, discard expired food, store food and food supplies separately from chemical compounds, and ensure dishes were clean. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 66. Findings included: a.) Observation of Undated and Expired Items in the Reach-in Cooler On 08/28/23 at 2:45 p.m., surveyors examined the contents of the kitchen 's reach-in cooler. An open container of applesauce was found to have no date on it to show when it had been opened. A plate containing cooked sausage patties and bacon also had no date on it to indicate when it had been placed in the cooler. An unsealed and open-to-air package of American deli slices was found to have no date on it to indicate when it was opened. A five (5) pound carton of dry grated parmesan cheese with a written date of 07/31/23 was found. Six (6) half-gallon jugs of buttermilk had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the building was free from avoidable accident hazards when the door to the water main and sprinkler room was left unlocked and accessible to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 66. Findings included: a.) Unlocked Water Main and Sprinkler Room Door On 08/29/23 at 10:31 AM a door to a room labeled Water Main Fire Sprinkler was found to be unlocked. The room was noticeably warmer than the hallway outside the door. The room contained the facility's water main shut-off valve, a floor waxer, hot water tanks, two bottles of air compressor oil, two breaker boxes, and multiple dirty rags. There was a sign on the inside of the door that said Door must remain locked. There was a sign on the outside of the door that read, biohazard. On 08/29/23 at 10:36 AM, the facility's Administrator was asked to open the door. The Administrator did so and then stated the door should not have been unlocked and accessible to residents.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan related to the need for isolation during an active episode of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) infection. Resident identifiers: #6, #34 and #5. Facility census: 65. Findings include: a) Resident #6 Review of the monthly infection line listing found Resident #6 was positive for urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by ESBL on 02/05/22 through 02/16/22 and 05/04/22 through 05/11/22. Resident #6 was not placed in contact isolation as directed by the care plan. Review of Resident #6's comprehensive care plan found: -Focus/problem: Resident has a recent history of ESBL placing her at risk for further complications. Date Initiated: 02/07/2022. - Goal: Resident will remain free from further UTI's with ESBL through next quarter. Date Initiated: 02/07/2022. -Intervention: Monitor resident for s/s of UTI, such as: c/o burning, pain, flank pain, urgency, or frequency, and notify physician. Date Initiated: 02/07/2022. - Re-educate staff as needed. Date Initiated: 02/07/2022. - Standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interview the facility failed to implement an infection control program designed to reduce the transmission of resistant organism (Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. This failed practice had potential to affect a more than a limited number of residents who currently reside at the facility. Resident identifiers: #5, #54, and #6. Facility census 65. Findings included: a) Resident #5 Review of the monthly infection line listing found Resident #5 was positive for urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by Extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) on 06/08/22 through 06/20/22 and 02/08/23 through 02/22/23. Resident #5 was not placed in contact precautions as directed by the care plan. Review of Resident #5's comprehensive care plan found: -Focus/problem: Resident has a history of ESBL in urine placing her at risk for further complications. Date Initiated: 07/17/2020. -Goal: Resident will remain free from further episodes of UTI with ESBL. Date Initiated: 07/17/2020. -Interventions: Monitor resident for s/s of UTI, such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 16 residents reviewed during the long term care survey, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. The facility failed to follow physician orders for obtaining blood pressures for Resident #68. In addition, the facility failed to follow physician orders for administration of a medication used to treat diabetes mellitus for Resident #29. Resident identifiers: #68 and #29. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #68 Record review found the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/16/22, the Resident was discharged to home. Review of the physician orders found an order: No sticks, lab draws or BPs (blood pressure's) in the right arm. (The Resident had a mastectomy of the right breast.) Review of the recorded blood pressures in the electronic medical record found the following occasions when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care was consistent with the professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for catheter care. Resident identifier: R#46. Facility census 65. Findings included: a) Resident #46 On 02/22/23 at 8:45 AM, an observation of catheter care provided by Nurse Aide (NA) #21: NA #21 failed to fold the washcloth (so a clean part of the washcloth could be used with each stroke or wipe) or change washcloths for each stroke. In addition, NA #21 failed to hold the inner labia open and hold the tubing at the base of the meatus and wipe away from the meatus. After the observation was completed, NA #46 stated it has been a while since she had been in an in-service for catheter care. On 02/22/23 at 9:10 AM, the above observations were discussed with the Director of Nursing. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the pharmacist's recommendations and the physician order for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the category of unnecessary medications during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #54. Census 65. Findings Included: a) Resident #54 Record review on 02/21/23 at 12:15 PM, discovered a consultation report scanned into the electronic medical record under the documents tab, recommending the monitoring of the resident's blood sugar for five (5) days and then to re-evaluate the use of the medication Onglyza and blood sugars. This consultation report was dated 01/17/23. A telephone order was placed in the resident's chart on 01/17/23 at 12:07 PM written as follows, Monitor blood sugar once daily at 0630 x 5 days then re-eval. Notify Physician if >300 or <70. The review of the medication administration record (MAR) indicated a documented blood sugar on 01/18/23 of 87, no other blood sugars documented on the MAR for the 5 days in question. Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary indicated a documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-08-01 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to post the staffing posting form in a prominent location and failed to complete information on the form accurately. This was discovered through the long term care survey process and had the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Identifiers: Staffing Posting location, missing and inaccurate data. Facility Census: 67. Findings include: a) Staffing Posting location: On 07/29/24 at 08:32 AM during a tour of the front entrance, the staffing posting form was not identified to be posted in a prominent location for residents and visitors access to view. During interview with Admissions Director (AD) #36, she stated that normally it is posted at the door but it is also at the Director of Nursing (DON) office that is located at the end of the hall way near the nurses station. This location is not considered to be a prominent location as not all residents or visitors may go past the rooms they are in or visiting to go to the DON's office or nurses station. The AD #26 acknowledged that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting included the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff and the number of staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Staff posting Observation of the staff posting dated 02/22/23 at 12:10 PM, found the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff was not posted for the day shift staff (7:00 AM -3:00 PM ) or the night shift (11:00 PM-7:00 AM) This was confirmed by the administrator at 12:30 PM on 02/22/23. Further review of the daily nurse staffing posted forms found on 02/12/23, the facility documented NO (0) nurse aides had worked on the night shift (11:00 AM to 7:00 AM.) At 2:00 PM on 02/22/23, the administrator produced payroll documentation verifying three (3) NA's had worked this shift, not 0 as reported. The administrator confirmed the posting was incorrect. .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$193,892 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
  • $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
  • $176,498 — penalty dated 2024-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME 1 of 5Sandia Ridge CenterAlbuquerque, NM

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
FAULKINER, KELBYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
LARSON, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2024
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/17/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 4%Other / private 9%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$296per resident / day
operating cost
$8,995per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next