Pine Lodge
405 Stanaford Road, Beckley, WV 25801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (304) 252-6317 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,910 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.5% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.2% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 4.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.6% | 15.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.9% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.6% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.3% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.9% | 79.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.6% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.8% | 11.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.1%CMS range 26.7–42.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 9.5–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.8–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident # 3 was free from neglect. Nurse Aide #137 was assigned to be on one to one supervision with Resident #3 due to multiple falls. NA #137 neglected the resident by leaving the residents room braking the one to one supervision to go to the nurses station to plug up his phone. While he was out of the room Resident #3 got out of bed and fell and sustained a fracture to her facial bones. The neglect perpetrated by Resident #137 resulted in actual harm for Resident #3 when she sustained a [NAME] Fort 1 fracture (A horizontal fracture separating the teeth and hard palate from the upper maxilla. The upper teeth are mobile, but the nose and eyes remain stable). This was true for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for abuse during the long term care survey. This will be cited as past non compliance because the facility identified the failures, identified the harm, and put a plan in place to correct the failures prior to 05/17/26 the first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable home-like environment by failing to ensure clean bed and bath linens in good condition available for the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #31, #78 and #38. Facility Census: 117.Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Laundry handing and Processing policy stated. Laundry in a healthcare facility may included bed sheets, blankets, towels, personal clothing, patient apparel, gowns, and other linens. Par levels should be maintained to meet the residents' needs. On 05/17/26, the par level for linens were requested by this surveyor. The facility staff were unable to state the par level for this facility. The policy and procedure for Safe and Homelike Environment stated the center must provide: 1.3 Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition.b) On 05/17/26 at 2:55 PM, the North Hall closet was investigated. Nurse Aide #57 confirmed there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to correctly interpret the results of an investigation related to neglect for Resident #54, #83, #93, and #105. This was true for four (4) of eight (8) residents under the care area of neglect. Resident Identifiers: #54, #83, #93, and #105. Facility Census: 117. a) Facility-Reported Incident On 05/20/2026 at 1:38 PM, a facility-reported incident (FRI) dated 12/11/25 was reviewed. The FRI noted the following, On 12/11/25, Resident #54 alleged to staff that she was not changed all night the night of 12/10/25 into the morning of 12/11/25. The alleged perpetrator Nurse Aide (NA) #139 was suspended pending investigation. Through witness statements and documentation, the assigned CNA (certified nursing assistant) stated that she had changed and checked on Resident #54 multiple times throughout the night. She stated that there were a couple of times that the call light was on and Resident #54 was asleep. She stated that she did still check to see if Resident #54 had been needing to be changed and she was dry. Per her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for three (3) residents in the area of Minimum Data Set (MDS), and care plan. Resident identifiers: #2, and #12. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #12 A review of Resident #12's medical record on 05/20/25 found she was admitted to hospice services on 06/05/25. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/20/25. A review of this MDS found that under Section J1400 Prognosis the following question was answered No: Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months? Further review of the MDS with an ARD of 06/20/25 found Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs), section K1 (Hospice care) was not marked, indicating the resident was not receiving this service even though she was receiving it. An interview with MDS Coordinator #5 and the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised for four (4) residents. The issues included a resident declining assistance with meals, a resident receiving dialysis, a resident preferring to sleep in the dining room and a resident whose discharge status had changed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #5, #22, #63, and #102. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 09/20/26, Resident #5's care plan was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's care plan stated, Resident/patient has potential for discharge, or is expected to be discharged , related to: admission for skilled short-term stay. Possible LTC. Date Initiated: 09/03/24. On 05/21/26 at 8:59 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the resident was long term care and the care plan had not been revised. b) Resident #22 On 05/19/25 at 12:45 PM, Resident #22's care plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed as posted and stated on the resident's tray cards. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #31, #67, #68, #17 and #27. Facility Census: 117.Findings included: a) The facility's posted menu for 05/17/26 was as follows: Roasted turkey w/Gravy, Carrots, Oven Browned Potatoes, Dinner Roll or Egg & Sausage Casserole, [NAME] toast-Butter-Jelly, and Vanilla Ice Cream. Tray cards observed varied with vanilla ice cream, mixed fruit and peanut butter pie printed for dessert. The Week at a Glance menu given to the state surveyor for a Regular Liberalized diet stated the resident was to receive vanilla ice cream. The Week at a Glance menu for Therapeutic Lifestyle change stated the resident was to receive fruit sherbet. The facility's policy and procedure for Menu Standards stated, 5. Daily menus will be posted & the Week-At-A-Glance Menu may be used when state regulations require portion size…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in a manner that prevented foodborne illness to the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) On 05/17/2026 at 10:15 AM, the Kitchen Investigation was initiated. The following items were observed by the state surveyor and confirmed by [NAME] #112 at 10:22 AM: -House Recipe Quick Oats - not sealed.-Muffin Mix - opened with use by date 04/26.-Cream Soup Base - opened with use by date 05/15/26.-Iced over freezer chest (Good Humor) containing ice cream with two (2)- three (3) inches of ice inside the entire chest. b) On 05/17/2026 at 10:25 AM, the following items were found and confirmed by [NAME] #112: -Eight (8) boxes piled in the floor by the door with trash in the top box (containing gloves and wrappers).-Pieces of paper and dirty floor in the dry storage room. c) On 05/17/26 at 10:36 AM, the following items were observed by the state surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly in the kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) On 05/17/2026 at 10:15 AM, the Kitchen Investigation was initiated. Eight (8) boxes were plied on the floor by the kitchen door. The top box contained included gloves and wrappers. Torn pieces of paper were on the floor in the dry storage room. The garbage and refuse were confirmed by [NAME] #112 at 10:25 AM.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and complete record for Resident #62's Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, a transfer form for Resident #13, accurate weights for Resident #15. This was true for three (3) of 33 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #62, #13, #15. Facility Census: 117.Findings Include: a) Resident #62 On 05/17/26 at 11:45 AM, the POST form was reviewed for Resident #62. The review found the signature of the resident representative was not dated. On 05/18/2026 at 12:02 PM , the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #51 confirmed the resident representative's signature was not dated. b) Resident #13 On 05/19/26 at 6:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #13. The review found the resident had been sent to an acute care facility on 02/25/26. However, the date on the transfer form was 06/17/25, which was incorrect. On 05/19/26 at 6:16 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the date was incorrect on the transfer form. c) Resident #15 The facility's policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program during medication administration for Resident #53 and #62, cleanliness for the East and [NAME] shower rooms, and the facility laundry room. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #53, #62. Facility Census: 117.Findings Include: a) Medication Administration On 05/19/26 at 8:00 AM, medication administration was being observed for Resident #53 completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13. When LPN #13 started to obtain the medication for Resident #53, hand hygiene was not completed prior to pulling the medication. Prior to completing an accucheck for the blood sugar level, no hand hygiene was completed. After the accucheck was completed hand hygiene was not completed. Upon returning to the medication cart, LPN #13 cleansed the glucometer with a sani-wipe. No hand hygiene was completed after cleansing the glucometer. On 05/19/26 at 8:15 AM, LPN #13 began pulling medication for Resident #62. After administering Resident #62's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to provide dependent residents with necessary activities of daily living (ADL) for Resident #62's nail care. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of ADLs. Resident Identifiers: #62. Facility Census: 117.Findings Include: a) Resident #62 On 05/17/2026 at 12:30 PM, an initial interview was held with Resident #62. The resident stated, Look at my nails, they need cut. At this time, the resident's nails were observed to be long and in need of filing. On 05/18/26 at 9:15 AM, the resident was observed in her room. At this time, the nails remained long. On 05/19/26 at 4:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I think they trimmed them yesterday but let me check. Activities usually does the nail care .they are going to start doing manicures once or twice a month. The DON did confirm the nail care should have been provided by the Activities department. The DON did not confirm at this time if the nails had been trimmed. On 05/20/2026 at 10:00 AM, an observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accident-free environment, of which it has control, for storage of medication for Resident #10. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 117.Findings Include: a) Resident #10On 05/17/26 at 12:10 PM, an initial interview was held with Resident #10. An observation of two (2) inhalers and a medication cup containing one (1) TUM at the bedside. At this time, the resident was asked, Do you keep medication at the bedside? The resident responded, I haven't taken them yet .I was getting dressed and putting lotion on. On 05/17/26 at 12:13 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #75 was asked to come into the resident's room. LPN #75 was asked, Is this resident supposed to have medication at bedside? LPN #75 stated, My bad. On 05/17/26 at approximately 12:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the medication at the bedside. The DON stated, Medication is not supposed to be at bedside.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was maintained for Resident #124 and #15. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifers: #124 and #15. Facility Census: 117,Findings Include: a) Resident #124 On 05/17/2026 at 12:10 PM, an initial interview was conducted with Resident #124. An observation of the oxygen concentrator found the humidy bottle was empty. An interview was held with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #75 regarding the oxygen therapy and the humidity bottle on 05/17/26 at 12:13 PM. LPN #75 stated, let me go get a new bottle .it should be on there. On 05/17/26 at approximately 2:00 PM, the Administrator was notified. The Administrator confirmed the humidy bottle should not be empty if used with oxygen therapy. b) Resident # 15 During the initial surveyor process, Resident #15 reported she was on four (4) liters of oxygen and she had difficulty breathing at times. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set on 3.5 liters upon observation. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22 reported she thought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a medication used in dialysis patients to help decrease the phosphate levels in a residents blood which was ordered to be given outside of the recommened dose or freqency was given only after consultation with the dialysis provider. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of dialysis during the long term care survey. Resident Identifier: #102. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #102 A review of Resident #102's medical record found he was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 04/28/26. A review of the physician orders found a physician order for Sevelamer Carbonate Oral Tablet 800 MG (Sevelamer Carbonate) (Generic for Renvela): Give 1 tablet by mouth with meals for Hyperphosphatasemia, starting 01/17/26. This was the current order when the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Upon his readmission to the facility the following order was entered into the medical record:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a diet was provided that took into the consideration the resident's preferences. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 117. Finings included: a) Resident #22 - On 05/19/26 at 7:25 AM, Resident #22 was observed in the dining room and was not eating her breakfast. The resident stated she received cornflakes and did not like them and would not eat them, The resident reported she disliked hard boiled eggs. The resident's Tray Card stated, 2 bowls of fruit loops (with 'out' handwritten), NO EGGS or pork. and Assorted fruit juices - 8oz. The resident was served cornflakes, two (2) boiled eggs and no juice. Following surveyor intervention, the resident received two bowls of fruit loops since the delivery truck had just run. Registered Nurse #5 confirmed the resident's tray card and the food the resident was served. b) The facility's policy and procedure for Dining Service Standards stated, 8.1 Meal Selection: meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #31 and #68. Facility Census: 117.Findings included: a) Resident #31 On 05/17/2026 at 11:45 AM, during the initial investigation process, Resident #31's lunch tray and tray card were observed. The resident's tray card stated, Large portions for meals. The resident did not receive large portions. Registered Nurse #3 confirmed the resident received a regular size serving of food on her tray. The resident's care plan stated, Resident is of nutrition concern related to potential for inadequate po intake, GERD. The resident's diet order stated, Regular/Liberalized diet, Regular Texture texture, Standard Thin Liquids consistencyLarge portions. b) Resident #68 On 05/17/26 at 11:30 AM, Resident #68 was observed in the dining room at the lunch meal. the residents tray card stated, Large Protein. The resident was served a regular size portion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable home like environment by not taking reasonable care to protect residents personal property from loss, and by not ensuring comfortable temperatures in the dining area. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed for personal property and was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #108. Facility census 113. Findings Include: a) Resident #108 During the initial interview on 06/16/25 at 12:19 PM, Resident #108 stated, I came here in march and some of my stuff is still missing. They say the washing machine is broken and that it will be down for 6 months. They say they are looking for my stuff, but how long do I have to wait? A review of the Grievance Log on 06/17/25 at 8:30 AM, revealed a grievance filed by Resident #108 dated 06/05/25 and reads that Resident #108 was missing the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate an advanced directive. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #111 and #65. Facility Census: 3. Findings included: a) Resident #111 On 06/16/25 at 02:38 PM, Advanced Directives were not found on the electronic chart for Resident #111. The resident was coded as a Full Code. On 06/17/25 at 9:42 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed there was no Advanced Directive completed on the medical chart. The Interim Administrator reported without an advanced directive; the resident is automatically made a full code. b) Resident #65 On 06/16/25 at 4:14 PM, Advanced Directives were not found on the electronic chart for Resident #65. The resident was coded as a Full Code. On 06/17/25 at 09:42 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed there was no Advanced Directive completed on medical chart. The Interim Administrator reported without an advanced directive; the resident is automatically made a full code.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by not passing medications at their scheduled administration times. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #70. Facility Census 113. Findings include: a) Resident #70 During the initial interview on 06/16/25 at 11:17 AM, Resident #70 stated, Sometimes I have to wait a long time on my medicine. Our medications are never on time. A record review on 06/18/25 AT 11:30 AM, of Resident #70's Medication Administration Audit Report (MAAR) revealed the following: -04/06/25 Lyrica Capsule 50 Milligrams (MG) was to be given at 6:00 AM and was not administered until 8:16 AM -04/07/25 Lasix oral tablet 20 MG was to be given at 12:00PM and was not administered until 2:27 PM. -04/24/25 Cholecalciferol Oral Capsule 1.25 MG was to be given at 8:00 AM and was not administered until 2:20 PM -04/30/25 Potassium Chloride 10 MEQ, Sennosides-Docusate Sodium Tablet 8.6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure catheter had proper drainage during a transfer. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care survey and had the potential to affect a minimal number of residents. Resident Identifier: #104 Facility Census: 113 Findings Include: During an observation on 06/19/25 at 10:55 AM the surveyor observed therapy staff transferring Resident #104 from their wheelchair to stretcher. While transferring the catheter bag was hooked to the transfer belt staff was using to transfer Resident #104. The transfer belt was placed above the waste and not allowing proper drainage that can allow for the possibility for a UTI. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/19/25 at 11:30 AM confirmed the catheter back should have been below the waste to maintain proper flow stating, I have already educated staff when i heard this had happened.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures in a resident's room were maintained and logged in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: 36. Facility Census: 113. Findings included: a) On 06/17/25 at 09:04 AM, the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log for Resident # 36's personal refrigerator for June 2025 was reviewed and the following temperature and dates were recorded on the log: Temperatures recorded: 06/05/25 - 45 degrees 06/06/25 - 45 degrees 06/09/25 - 48 degrees 06/10/25 - 46 degrees No temperatures were recorded for 06/03/25, 06/04/25, 06/07/25, and 06/08/25. On 06/17/25 at 9:00 AM, Nursing Assistant #1 confirmed the missing dates, and the temperatures recorded on the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log. b) The facility's policy and procedure for 'Refrigerators: Patient In-Room' stated, 4.1 A Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log will be maintained for every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a correct and complete medical record was maintained for residents. This was true for two (2) of thirty (30) residents reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: # 65 and # 111. Facility census: 113. Findings included: a) On 06/17/25, Advance Directives were not located for Resident # 65 and Resident #111 on the electronic medical chart. On 06/17/25 9:42 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed there were no advanced directives for Resident #65 and #111 on the medical record The facility's policy and procedure purpose for Code Status Orders is To ensure that the patient's desired resuscitation wishes are documented in the medical record.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure all staff were competent and there were Sufficient nursing staff relate: to extremely late and omitted medications, Nursing staff failed to notify the physician and/or not done timely when blood glucose levels are not in the set parameter, showers not provided for dependent residents, missed treatment, lacking in meaningful activities, catheter care, care for tube feedings, staff adhering to infection control practices (including residents that are positive for COVID-19), and staff failed to document and dispense night time ordered snacks. Facility census 117. Findings included: I) F677 a) Resident #24 During an interview on 11/12/23 at 11:44 AM, Resident # 24 stated I don't get showers or bed baths. Observation revealed Resident #24's hair was disheveled and sticking up everywhere. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 10:35 AM, Resident # 24 stated, The night shift (Nurse Aide (NA) #76's name) left me…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility document review, and staff interview the facility failed to post a staff posting that included the census, total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care. This was true for the last quarter and currently. These failed practices had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Staff postings On 11/12/23 at 10:30 AM it was noted the staff posting located at the front lobby of the facility did not contain the information of a daily census, number of nurse aides, number of nurses, and the total hours worked per day. On 11/12/23 at 11:00 AM, the staff posting for the last week and every weekend of the last quarter was requested from the person in charge Registered Nurse #19. On 11/13/23 at 9:00 AM, the above was requested again to the Administrator. On 11/14/23 at 12:30 PM, again the staff postings were requested. On 11/14/23 at 2:20 PM, the Administrator provided the staff postings; however, they did not contain the information needed, such as the daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and update the Facility Assessment Tool as required. This has the potential to affect all Residents at the facility. Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) Facility On 11/12/23 the Facility Assessment Tool was provided by the Director of Nursing. Upon review, it was noted that the information on the Assessment Tool was incorrect and had not been updated since 06/21/22. According to the regulation, the facility must conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility must review and update that assessment, as necessary, and at least annually. The facility must also review and update this assessment whenever there is, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment. The Facility Assessment Tool provided stated the following: Date of assessment or update is 06/21/22 Date(s) assessment reviewed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases, including Covid-19, during an active Covid-19 outbreak. Linens were not handled appropriately within the laundry room or during transport. Medication administration for Covid-19 positive Resident was not done correctly to prevent the possible spread of Covid-19. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not appropriately worn and discarded after Resident care. Continual Infection Surveillance was not completed for evaluation of proper hand hygiene performance. These failed practices had the potential to affect all residents. Resident identifiers: #28, #167. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Laundry Room Record review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Policies and Procedures, Linen Handling, revised on 05/01/23, showed direction for facility staff to keep clean linen covered and keep clean storage area separate from other soiled areas. During tour of the office/clean linen storage area of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program that promoted the appropriate use of antibiotics including a system of tracking and monitoring outcomes. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 115. Finding included: On 11/15/23 at 11:26 AM, the Director of Nursing stated the facility had been without an Infection Preventionist (IP) since September 2023, and there was not anything done with the antibiotic stewardship stuff in October 2023. The DON further stated once she realized they expected her do it, she started keeping track of the antibiotic use again in November 2023. Review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship surveillance log showed no documentation for antibiotic use for the month of October 2023. The DON verified there was possibly twenty-six (26) Residents that were administered antibiotics for the month of October 2023, as evidenced by a report she ran from the Electronic Medical System.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to designate one or more individual(s) as the infection preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 115. Findings included: Record review showed no designated IP on the employee roster. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 1:35 PM the Administrator was asked who the infection preventionist was for the facility? The Administrator replied, We don't have one. We have been without one for a while. The administrator further stated she had to terminate the last IP on 09/28/23.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to consider the views of resident council and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the resident council concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) During the resident council meeting on 11/13/23 at 1:00 PM, numerous residents stated they do not feel that their grievances and concerns are being taken care of. We complain here, and no one does anything about it. Review of the council meeting minutes from 06/06/23, 07/05/23, 08/01/23, 09/05/23,10/03/23, and 11/07/23 had multiple resident concerns which included the following: -TV channels are messed up -food is not hot and cold food is not cold - floors need swept and mopped better, floors are sticky -personal clothes are not coming back timely -not getting showers, call lights not answered timely There was no documentation to indicate a response from any departments had been made to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of an elevated blood glucose level. This was true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Resident identifiers: #56, #42, and #73. Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Resident #56 Medical record review revealed there were multiple times the Residents blood glucose levels were greater than 400. The order from the facility physician stated to call if blood sugars were greater than 400. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found the following times the blood glucose levels were over 400 and the physician was not notified or the physician was not notified timely: 09/30/23 at 4:30 PM, blood glucose was 488. No note about notifying the physician. 10/06/23 at 4:30 PM blood glucose was 504. The physician was notified at 6:08 PM. 10/07/23 at 6:30 AM blood glucose was 428. No note about notifying the physician. 10/07/23 at 4:30 PM blood glucose was 484. The physician was notified at 6:43 PM. 10/09/23 at 4:30 PM blood glucose was 486. The physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
m) Resident #57 On 11/12/23 at 12:49 AM, observation was made of Resident #57's mattress and it was heavily soiled. The bed was occupied by Resident #57. The mattress was bare with no sheets or blankets. Resident stated, I don't want sheets or blankets, I like it this way because of my skin breaking out. The mattress had what appeared to be white/cream colored dried flakes of skin outlining his body. A dried liquid substance was running down the left and right side of the mattress, and the surface of the mattress at the Resident's midsection was covered with a dried white substance and food particle. The soiled mattress was verified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #27. LPN #27 stated, I'll let someone know it needs cleaned. During observation of care on 11/13/23 9:52 AM, Resident #57's mattress was found to be soiled and dirty. Nursing Aide (NA) #143 stated, Yell, that needs cleaned, we have to use a special cleaning solution because of his skin allergies. On 11/14/23 at 10:39 AM, observation was made in the presence of the Administrator of Resident #57's soiled bed mattress.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide care to residents that was required to maintain hygiene to a resident who was dependent for Activities Of Daily Living (ADL) care. This is true for four (4) of eight (8) reviewed for ADL care area during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifiers: #24, #61, #1, and #66. Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) Resident #24 During an interview on 11/12/23 at 11:44 AM, Resident # 24 stated I don't get showers or bed baths. Observation revealed Resident #24's hair was disheveled and sticking up everywhere. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 10:35 AM, Resident # 24 stated, The night shift (Nurse Aide (NA) #76's name) left me shitty since two (2) AM, and I am still not changed, and I still have not gotten a shower or bed bath. This surveyor asked Resident # 24 to turn on the call light at 10:37 AM. The Administrator in Training (AIT) #97 came into the room at 10:39 AM and stated I saw your call light on what do you need? Resident # 24 stated, I have not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This practice was found true for six (6) of six (6) Residents reviewed for the Activity Care Area during the Long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: Resident #85, Resident #62, Resident #96, Resident #22, Resident #82, and Resident #73 . Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) Resident #85 During an interview on 11/12/23 at 11:56 AM, Resident # 85 stated there are no activities, I do stuff in my room to keep busy, but they don't do anything. During a record review on 11/15/23 9:30 AM , Resident #85's medical record revealed an recreation comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] with the Resident Preferences coded were listed as follows: -bingo -doing things with groups of people -Social gatherings -Outside for fresh air -Attend…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow Physicians orders in the areas of neurological checks, medication administration, and skin/wound treatments. Resident identifiers: #42, #67, #1, #56, #73, #86, #18 and #28. Facility Census: 115 Findings Included: a) Resident #42 1) Record review on 11/14/23 at 01:04 PM shows resident #42 had an unwitnessed fall on 08/08/23 at 12:45 PM. Status post of the fall he complained of right leg and back pain. He was sent to the local emergency room for X-rays, which were negative, and he returned to the facility on [DATE] at 06:50 PM. Facility policy NSG204 Neurological Evaluation, revision date of 06/01/21 states: Neurological evaluations will be performed as indicated or ordered. When a patient sustains an injury to the head or face and/or has an unwitnessed fall, neurological evaluation will be performed: Every 15 minutes X two (2( hours, then Every 30 minutes X two (2) hours, then Every 60 minutes X four (4) hours, then Every eight (8) hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure the environment is free from accident hazards over which it has control. Resident #111's cigarettes were in the room and Resident #28's inhaler was left in the room. This failed practice had a potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #111 and Resident #28. Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) Resident #111 During the initial tour 11/12/23 at 11:42 AM, Resident #111 had three (3) cigarettes laying on the over bed tables. There was no lighter found. During another observation on 11/13/23 at 10:55 AM , Resident #111 one (1) cigarette was laying on the over the bed table. During an observation on 11/13/23 at 2:00, Resident #111 had no cigarettes on the over the bed table. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 2:01 PM, Resident # 111 stated I don't smoke here. I am not allowed. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 3:52 PM the Administrator stated there was no smoking evaluation completed because resident #111 does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to serve food and drink that was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility's kitchen. Resident Identifiers: Resident #85, Resident #266 and Resident #22. Facility Census: 115. a) Test tray On 11/12/23 at 1:08 PM, the temperatures were obtained on the lunch meal tray at the time of service. The following temperatures were obtained by the Dietary Account Manager #108 using her thermometer: -chicken cacciatore: 124 degrees Fahrenheit -mixed vegetables: 110 degrees Fahrenheit -peach slices: 54.5 degrees Fahrenheit -chicken noodle soup: 125 degrees Fahrenheit. During an immediate interview the Dietary Account Manager #108 acknowledged the temperatures were not at the appropriate serving temperatures. And stated the hot foods should be over 120 degrees and the cold foods below 50 degrees. b) Interviews: During an interview on 11/12/23 at 11:56 AM, Resident #85 stated the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to respect the Residents right to be treated with respect and dignity. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #48. Facility Census: #115 Findings included: a) Resident #48 On 11/13/23 at 08:00 AM, observation was made of Nurse Aid (NA) #91 assisting Resident #48 with his breakfast meal. NA #91 was standing while feeding him. This was confirmed immediately with NA #91. Her response was, I can't, I didn't know that? According to the Genesis Procedure: Feeding a patient/resident revision date 06/01/21 states 6. Sit in chair at eye level with the patient . This was confirmed with the Administrator on 11/13/23 at 09:15 AM, who agreed that NA #91 should be sitting down while feeding the Resident and stated she will re-educate the NA. No additional documentation was provided prior to exiting the survey.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for new diagnosis of Bipolar disorder. This was true for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. Resident identifier: #22. Facility Census 115. Findings Include a) Resident #22 A record review on 11/13/23 at 10:00 AM, revealed that Resident #22 received a new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder on 05/09/22. The Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review on 11/13/23 at 10:00 AM found Resident #22's initial PASARR upon admission did not indicate a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. A record review on 11/13/23 at 10:00 AM, of Resident #22 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/17/13 did not indicate an active diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. A record review on 11/13/23 at 10:00 AM, of Resident #22 last MDS which was a Significant change with an ARD of 10/06/23 revealed that Section I for Psychiatric/mood disorder section 15900 is marked for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and observation the facility failed to properly secure Resident #23's indwelling urinary catheter device. This was true for one (1) of one (1) Residents reviewed for catheter care and had the potential to affect only a limited number of Residents. Resident identifier: #23. Facility census:115. Findings included: a) Resident #23 During observation of catheter care on 11/13/23 at 1:05 PM, Resident #23's urinary indwelling Foley catheter was found to not have an catheter securement device in use. The tubing going to the bed side drain bag was stretched tight across the Residents right leg, pulling at the Resident's penis causing tension. A previous adhesive catheter secure device was attached to the drain tubing, but not to Resident's leg. Resident #23 was asked if he preferred to wear an anchoring device for his catheter and he stated, I had one, but it came off. I would wear it if I had it The resident further stated he liked the straps that wrapped around his leg better like the hospital had but he will take what he can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by not completing weights/re-weights appropriately. This was true for one (1) of three (3) Residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident identifier: #58 Facility Census: #115 Findings Included: a) Resident #58 On 11/13/23 at 02:20 PM record review shows the following documented weights: 11/13/2023 14:44 150.2 Lbs Wheelchair 11/07/2023 14:12 153.0 Lbs Standing 10/03/2023 13:48 196.5 Lbs Standing 9/25/2023 12:35 199.6 Lbs Standing 9/21/2023 22:33 157.0 Lbs Mechanical Lift 9/26/2023 15:29 Correction The above documentation shows a 43.5 pound weight loss from 10/03/23 until 11/07/23. admission records from the hospital states Resident #58 weighed 162 pounds on 09/12/23. Re-weight on 11/13/23, during the survey, shows the Resident weighs 150.2 pounds. The facility Clinical System Process - Weights and Vitals dated 04/02/20 states If the re-weight verifies that the first weight (discrepant weight) was accurate, both entries will remain as entered in Point Click Care (PCC).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent complications of enteral feeding for Resident #96 and Resident #97. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of feeding tube during the long term care survey. Resident Identifier: #96 and #97. Facility Census: 115 Findings Included: a) Resident #96 A review of Resident #96's medical record found the following two (2) orders related to Resident #96 enteral feeding tube: -- Enteral Feed Order: Every 4 (four) hours water flush 240 ML (Milliliters), PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) every 4 (four) hours after each bolus. -- Enteral Feed: Flush Tube with 30 ml of water before and after each medication pass. Flush Tube with a least 15 ml of water between each medication. An observation beginning 12:07 pm and concluding at 12:27 pm on 11/13/23 found Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #37 administered Resident #96 his 10:00 am medication. The residents received the following medications during this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all Pharmacy recommendations were answered with a rationale and in a timely manner. This was true for two (2) out of five (5) Residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Resident identifiers: #56, and #25. Facility census 117. Findings included: Facility Policy titled, LTC Facility's Pharmacy Services and Procedures Manual revision on 08/17/23. * Facility should alert the Medical Director where MRR's are not addressed by the attending physician in a timely manner. a) Resident #56 During of Resident #56's medical records revealed a pharmacy recommendation from 04/11/23. The pharmacist made recommendations concerning the multiple antidepressants. The facility physician accepted the recommendation on 09/15/23. During an interview 11/15/23 at 10:16 AM, the Administrator was asked for a policy for Medication Regimen Review (MRR). The Administrator agreed that took a long time for a response from the facility physician. b) Resident #25 A record review found Resident #25 received a recommendation from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to obtain a consent for Physician ordered psychotropic drugs. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #42 Facility Census: 115 a) Resident #42 On 11/14/23 at 01:32 PM record review shows that Resident #42 has an order for Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG (Sertraline HCl) Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression and Buspirone HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Buspirone HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD.) Resident #42 has an active diagnosis for generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: (i) Anti-psychotic; (ii) Anti-depressant; (Sertraline) (iii) Anti-anxiety; and (Buspirone) (iv) Hypnotic Upon record review on 11/14/23 at 02:00 PM, there were no consents available for the two (2)psychotropic drugs Resident #42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of food by not having up to date temperature logs for resident personal refrigerators. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failed practice was true for 3 of 3 residents. Resident Identifiers #22, # 69, # 42. Facility census: 115. Findings Included: a) Resident #22 An observation on 11/12/23 at 11:45 AM, revealed that resident #22 had a personal refrigerator in her room with a Temperature log sheet filled out until 09/18/23. An interview on 11/12/23 at 11:45 AM, with Resident #22, who has a BIMS of 14 stated, They used to do those and then just stopped. During a record review on 11/13/23 at 2:00 PM, of Policy 031 Titled Food: Safe handling for Foods from Visitors #5 Refrigerator/freezers for storage of foods brought in by visitors will be properly maintained and have temperature monitored daily for refrigeration < 41 degrees Fahrenheit and Freezer < 0 degrees Fahrenheit. An interview on 11/13/23 at 2:00 PM, with housekeeper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately record the amount of a prescribed snack that was consumed. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents that currently reside at the facility. Resident identifiers: #66, #65, and #39. Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Resident #66 At the time of entering the facility on 11/12/23 at 10:30 AM, it was noted snacks were at the nursing station untouched and undelivered to the residents. The snack for Resident #66 was a cup of mixed fruit dated 11/11/23 labeled third snack. These snacks were seen and witnessed by Registered Nurse #19 at the time of discovery. A review of medical records revealed the staff documented Resident #66 consumed 100 percent of his third snack on 11/11/23. b) Resident #65 On 11/12/23 at 10:30 AM, it was noted that an oatmeal cake was labeled with the name of Resident #65 and dated 11/11/23 and called the third snack. These snacks were seen and witnessed by Registered Nurse #19 at the time of discovery on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating conditions. Two (2) Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units were not in safe operating conditions for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents residing in those rooms. Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] During the initial tour on 11/12/23 at 11:56 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s HVAC unit was void of a plastic guard. During an interview on 11/12/23 at 11:57 AM, Resident #85 stated, That heater has been missing the vents forever. During another observation on 11/13/23 at 10:56 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s HVAC unit's plastic guard was not there. During an interview on 11/14/23 at 4:31 PM, the Maintenance Director acknowledged the HVAC plastic guard was missing. The Maintenance Director stated, I will replace the whole unit, I have a new one I will put in. b) room [ROOM NUMBER] During the initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding medication administration for Resident #18, #66, #19 as well as wound care for Resident #35. This was true for four (4) of 11 residents reviewed during the complaint survey. Resident Identifiers: #18, #66, #19 and #35. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: a) Resident #18 On 08/30/23 at 2:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #18. The Medication Administration Audit Report was reviewed from 08/15/23 through 08/29/23 and found the following medications and accuchecks for blood glucose administered late: --08/15/23 Accuchecks twice daily scheduled at 4:00 PM, completed at 6:23 PM, which is 2 hours and 23 minutes late --08/15/23 Lantus 40 units twice daily scheduled at 9:00 PM, administered on 08/16/23 at 2:41 AM, which is 5 hours and 41 minutes late --08/15/23 Clonidine 0.1mg two times daily scheduled at 9:00 PM, administered on 08/16/23 at 2:40 AM, which is 5 hours and 40 minutes late --08/15/23 Prevastatin 80mg at bedtime scheduled at 9:00 PM, administered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and accident-free environment as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than an limited number of residents. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: On 08/29/23 at 12:30 PM, an observation of two unlocked (2) treatment carts were observed sitting by the nurses' station by the lobby at the entrance of the facility. No staff were in the vicinity of the treatment carts. On 08/29/23 at 12:40 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #2 and Nurse Performance Educator (NPE) #3 witnessed the unlocked carts. The ADON #2 locked the treatment carts immediately. Both the ADON #2 and NPE #3 confirmed the treatment carts should be locked at all times when not attended by staff. No further information was obtained during the complaint survey.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. These findings were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: Resident #66. Facility Census: 114 Findings Included: a) Facility: On 08/31/23 at 08:18 AM while observing the breakfast meal tray pass on the South Unit (Rooms 100-121), it was observed that no hand hygiene was offered to the residents prior to their breakfast meal. This was confirmed with Certified Nursing Aide #77 at the time of discovery. On 08/31/23 at 09:00 AM, review of Facility Policy #IC 405 and in accordance with standard practice of care found, the staff will perform hand hygiene per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and policy to provide hand hygiene prior to each meal. This was confirmed with the Administrator on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — patternReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to report a COVID-19 outbreak in their building to their Residents, their Representatives and Families. This failed practice had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: #114 Findings Included: a) On 08/31/23 at 01:45 PM a record review shows the facility had a staff member test positive for COVID-19 on 08/07/23. Further testing of staff and residents on the following days found an additional seven (7) staff members and fifteen (15) residents tested positive. The documented positive dates range from 08/07/23 through 08/21/23. During an interview with the Administrator on 08/31/23 at 2:00 PM, she confirmed notification was not complete to notify Residents, their Representatives and Families of the outbreak, other than to the Residents, their Representatives and Families of the positive residents. According to the Facility Infection Control Policy #IC 405, COVID-19 Reporting #32. states COVID-19 date required by Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services (CMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement the care plan for skin care, respiratory complications, mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs). This was true for two (2) of 11 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident Identifier: #115 and #21. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: a) Resident #115 On 08/30/23 at 10:00 AM, a record review was completed. The review found Resident#115's care plan had not been developed in the following focus areas: --risk for respiratory complications --risk for skin breakdown --mobility --activities of daily living The focus area of risk for respiratory complications did not list specific and complete goals. The focus area of risk for skin breakdown was not complete and did not list specific and complete goals as well as completed interventions. The focus areas of mobility and ADLs did not specify if the resident needed assistance or if the resident was dependent for their needs as well as completed interventions. The focus area of mobility did not list specific and complete goals. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for Resident #115's pressure ulcers and alteration in comfort care plan and Resident #21's actual fall and alteration in comfort care plan. This was true for two (2) of 11 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident Identifiers: #115 and #21. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: a) Resident #115 A record review was completed for Resident #115. The review found the care plan had not been revised regarding the development of a deep tissue injury (DTI) on the right fifth digit and right lateral foot as well as the left heel. An admission documentation note dated 07/21/23 did not list any skin issues. A skin check dated 07/31/23 noted the resident had new skin wounds and no previously noted skin injuries or wounds. These were listed as the left heel, right fifth digit and lateral foot. An incident report regarding the DTI to the left heel dated 07/28/23 was reviewed. The incident report indicated the resident had been having pain for two to three days prior the incident report and also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for Resident #115. This was true for one (1) resident of 11 reviewed during the complaint survey. Resident Identifier: #115. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: a) Resident #115 On 08/29/23 at 2:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #115. The review found the resident had development of a deep tissue injury (DTI) described as a dark purplish discoloration to the right fifth toe and right foot (measuring 4.76cm (centimeters) x 1.73cm x UTD (unable to determine) as well as the left heel measuring 3.46cm x 2.86cm x UTD. Scabbed areas were found on the second and third toe of the right foot. An admission documentation note dated 07/21/23 did not list any skin issues. A skin check dated 07/31/23 noted the resident had new skin wounds and no previously noted skin injuries or wounds. These were listed as the left heel, right fifth digit and lateral foot. An incident report regarding the DTI to the left heel dated 07/28/23 was reviewed. The incident report indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,910 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $20,910 — penalty dated 2026-05-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUNBRIDGE CARE ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| REGENCY HEALTH SERVICES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| COX, SHELDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/22/2024 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| RAHIM, MUSTAFA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.