Oak Grove Center
27 Cool St, Waterville, ME 04901 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (207) 873-0721 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,056 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-29)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 24.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.5% | 2.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 54.1% | 11.6% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.4% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.1% | 17.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.6% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.0% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.4% | 74.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.1% | 20.8% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.5% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.45 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.01 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.0%CMS range 46.9–63.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.6%CMS range 6.0–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.5–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 85.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment by allowing access to a potentially unsafe environment on 1 of 3 units observed for ([NAME] House). Findings: On 5/28/24 at 8:21 a.m., During an initial observation of [NAME] small dining room, 2 surveyors observed a large hole in the ceiling with an obvious leak. A yellow plastic wet floor sign was under the hole. A yellow mop bucket was approximately 4 feet away from the sign containing about 4 inches of dirty water. There were no barriers noted to prevent access to this area. Follow-up observations of [NAME] House small dining room on 5/28/24 between 9:45 a.m., and 3:45 p.m. revealed the following: -On 5/28/24 at 9:45 a.m., during a follow up facility, Ombudsman indicated the ceiling in [NAME] small dining room has been leaking for quite some time and she is not aware of the current plan for repair. At this time Resident #6 was observed self-ambulating in wheelchair and grabbing yellow mop bucket containing dirty water and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and reconciliation of all the resident's pre- and post-discharge medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge to the community (Resident #98).Finding: On review of Resident #98's clinical record, a surveyor noted an admission date of 12/13/25. The record indicated that on 1/14/26, Resident #98's managed care insurance denied coverage after 1/21/26, and Resident #98 was discharged home on 1/22/26. The surveyor located an incomplete recapitulation of stay in the electronic record dated 1/22/26. The record lacked evidence that the provider had completed a final summary of Resident #98's status, or a summary of the resident's pre- and post-discharge medications in the hard or electronic clinical record. On 6/2/26 at 3:55 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Market Lead Clinical Specialist confirmed that the provider had not completed a discharge summary prior to Resident #98's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, document review, the facility's Suicide Precautions policy and the facility's Person Centered Care Plan policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had signs of self-harm and suicidal ideation received the care and services necessary to reach and maintain the highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for mood/behavior (Resident #92).Findings:Review of the facility's Suicide Precautions revised 3/20/26, notedProcedure:1. Evaluate patients with suicidal behavior or ideation.2. Notify physician/advanced practice provider (APP) if assessment indicates patient is at risk for suicide. Collaborate with care team to determine risk level for suicide.2.1 Discuss Suicide safety plan with patient slash family slash representative.2.1.1 warning signs and triggers.3.1 Obtain order for suicide preventions from the physician slash app. Implementation of suicide precautions should not be delayed while awaiting physicians order. 3.2 evaluate immediate safety needs3.10 document: 1. Risk for suicide. 2. Actual/potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident #14).Findings:1. Resident #14 has diagnoses including dementia.On 6/2/26 at 8:52 a.m. during an interview, Resident #14's son stated that he has observed Resident #14 in the same soiled clothes, sometimes for days.On 6/3/26 at 11:17 a.m. a surveyor observed Resident #14 dressed in a light blue t-shirt with a logo and dark blue pants. The surveyor observed Resident #14 in this clothing multiple times throughout the day.On 6/4/26 at 8:25 a.m. during a repeat observation, Resident #14 was dressed in the same light blue t-shirt and dark blue pants as the previous day.A review of Resident #14's clinical record revealed an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting note dated 4/8/26 that states, .[son] expressed concerns with the resident having the same pair of clothes on for several days in a row A review of Resident #14's care plan states, .Provide resident/patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the current resident representative was notified of a change in the resident's medication regimen for 1 of 3 residents having court appointed guardianship (Resident #1 [R1]).Finding: On 1/28/26 at 1:12 p.m., in a telephone interview, R1's Public Guardian Representative stated the facility's primary provider increased R1's dose of Lithium (a mood stabilizer and antimanic agent) without obtaining the Guardian's consent. On 1/29/26 at 9:45 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the facility's social worker described the process for notification of changes to court appointed guardians. The social worker stated for any change in condition or need to send a resident out, nursing is to call and get approval of the guardian, specifically for anything requiring a decision. On 1/29/26, a review of R1's clinical record noted a copy of a court's decision, dated 10/31/18, appointing the Department of Health and Human Services as a full public guardian and conservator for R1. A review of provider orders noted that on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 3 units ([NAME] Unit, [NAME] Unit and [NAME] Unit) and the laundry room for 1 of 1 facility tour. Findings: On 3/20/25 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., a surveyor conducted an Environmental Tour with the Senior Maintenance Director, Administrator and the Maintenance Directo in which the following findings were observed: [NAME] Unit - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom had urine around the base of the toilet and had a very strong odor of urine. - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The sink countertop had chipped/missing laminate on the front edge. The sink overflow drain hole was broken open and rusty. The right side drawers under the sink were off-track and wouldn't close. The entire bathroom floor was dirty and dirty around the base of the toilet. The walls behind the head of the beds had paint that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to implement a care plan for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident (R20, R21, and R66). Findings: Review of the Person-Centered Care Plan policy dated 10/24/22 states a comprehensive person-centered care plan must be developed for each patient and must describe the following: .any specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services the Center will provide as a result of PASRR recommendations Care plans will be: . Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals . 1. During an interview on 3/18/25 at 7:53 a.m., R20 stated his/her dental bridge fell out a while ago and is still waiting for it to be replaced. At this time R20 opened his/her mouth and a surveyor observed multiple missing teeth and what appeared to be a broken bridge on the inside of his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident [R] R13, R21, R46 and R65). Findings: Review of policy Nebulizer: Small Volume dated 11/1/23 states: .Upon completion of the treatment, .Rinse SVN, mouthpiece, and T piece with sterile water and dry. Place in treatment bag labeled with patient name and date . 1. On 3/19/25 at 8:41 a.m., observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], 3/19/25 at 7:30 a.m., and 11:39 a.m. revealed nebulizer located on top of Resident R13's side table with tubing attached with/to nebulizer pipe which is resting/stored on top of a stuffed animal without a barrier between the nebulizer pipe and the stuffed animal allowing potential cross contamination. On 3/19/25 at 11:30 a.m. observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), she confirmed nebulizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 3 of 3 sampled resident reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #(R)15, R27 and R35). Findings: 1. Resident (R) 35 was admitted in 2024 and has diagnoses to include post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of R35's care plan updated 1/22/25 lacked evidence that a trauma informed care plan was established to include triggers for this resident's PTSD diagnoses. Review of R35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, I6100 was coded to indicate R35 had an active diagnosis for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). The surveyor was unable to find information in the clinical record that indicated what R35's PTSD was caused by or what events might cause re-traumatization. During an interview with 4 surveyors on 3/21/25 at 3:00 p.m., Market…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside on 3 of 3 units. Findings: 1. On 3/18/25 at 8:45 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, RN5 stated the facility had changed to primary nursing and had taken away the medication technician position approximately 1 month ago. This change has resulted in nurses having to administer their own medications and treatments, often up to an hour late. On this day, the nurse had a discharge scheduled at 9:00 a.m., as well as an IV antibiotic to administer. RN5 stated wound care would be provided late due to lack of staffing. 2. On 3/20/25 at 11:20 a.m., a surveyor requested to observe wound care for Resident #9. LPN2 stated he/she would not be able to get to the twice daily wound care until 1:30 - 2:00 p.m. due to the workload and tasks to be completed. LPN2 stated he/she usually tries to complete the wound care before lunch, but today,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation by failing to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, on 1 of 3 units reviewed ([NAME]). Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure: Controlled Drugs: Management Of, State of Maine, last revised 7/1/24, page 6, Section 5. Ongoing Inventory of Controlled Substances (Shift Count): 5.1 stated, Follow the Index Page to perform a complete count of all Schedule II to IV controlled substances at the change of shifts or at any time in which narcotic keys are surrendered from one licensed nursing staff to another. 5.1.3. Both medication nursing staff members participating in the count must: 5.1.3.3. Sign the shift count page in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and treatments were stored properly, including removal of expired medications from available supply, on 3 of 5 days of survey (3/18/25, 3/19/25, 3/20/25). Additionally, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for medications located at a resident's bedside, for 2 of 2 sampled resident (Resident #65 and #79). Findings: Review of policy Medication Self-Administration, revised 10/15/2024, states, Patients who wish to self-administer medications will be evaluated for safe and clinically appropriate capability .If it is determined that the patient is able to self-administer: A physician/advanced practice provider (APP) order is required .Self-administration and medication self-storage must be care planned .patient must be provided with a secure, locked area to maintain medications . Review of policy, Bedside Medication Storage, dated 1/2024, states, The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will review and approve resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain garbage storage areas in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests for 1 of 3 dumpsters for 1 of 4 days(3/18/24) and 1 of 3 dumpsters for 3 of 4 days of survey. (3/18/25, 3/19/25, and 3/20/25) Findings: 1. On 3/18/25 at 6:30 a.m., a surveyor observed 1 dumpster with the right-side slide door open exposing trash. Additionally, there was trash/debris on the ground. Another dumpster had a right-side top cover that was broken and open exposing trash. 2. On 3/19/25 at 8:00 a.m., a surveyor observed a dumpster had a right-side top cover that was broken and open exposing trash. 3. On 3/20/25 at 8:00 a.m., a surveyor observed a dumpster had a right-side top cover that was broken and open exposing trash. On 3/19/25 at 7:45 a.m., during an interview, the [NAME] stated the dumpsters are always supposed to be closed, but one of them has had a broken flap for a couple of weeks and she's not sure what they are doing about it. On 3/20/25 at 1:00 p.m., in an interview, the Administrator confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 5 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory (Resident #[R] R15, R20, R21, R41 and R44). Findings: 1. Review of R20's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II dated 2/25/25 revealed [he/she] has a Mental health disability and is qualified for Specialized services: You will need to be provided the following specialized services: Service or Support: Initial psychiatric evaluation to determine diagnosis and develop plan of care. Review of R20's clinical record lacked evidence this was done. Review of R20s clinical record revealed order with start date of 2/13/25 states. Is resident free from side effects of psychotherapeutic medications? (if no, document side effects in PN) every shift AND as needed. Review of R20's care plan updated 2/13/25 states is at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs Medication as ordered. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure that the Plan of Correction for identified deficiencies from the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process for Federal Recertification dated 2/1/24, were effective. The Federal citations F584, F625, F656, F689, F725, F842 and F880 were cited again during the annual Long Term Care Recertification Survey dated 3/24/25. Findings: During the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process for Federal Recertification dated 3/24/25, it was determined that F584, F625, F656, F689, F725, F842 and F880 would be recited for the same reasons: F584 for failure to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment; F625 failure to issue a written bed hold notice to include cost of care to the Resident and/or resident representative; F656 for failure to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan; F689 for failure to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to the storage of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (Resident #33) on 1 of 3 facility units. Findings: On 3/18/25 at 1:20 p.m., a surveyor observed 2 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) wearing gloves enter Resident #33's room with a mechanical hoyer lift. The resident's door was posted with a Contact Precautions sign which included a picture of a person wearing a gown, gloves, mask and face shield. The instructions stated Perform hand hygiene before and after patient contact, contact with environment and after removal of PPE (personal protective equipment). Wear N95/approved KN-95 respirator, gown, face shield and gloves upon entering this room. Change gown after EACH patient contact (written in red). Keep room door closed. Patient must wear a face mask when out of room and maintain social distancing. Perform all procedures/tests in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative were provided with written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advanced directive, was completed for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Residents #27, and #79) Findings: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024. A review of the entire medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. On 3/19/25 at 11:56 a.m., in an interview, the Market Clinical Advisor confirmed that medical records lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the residents and/or resident representatives or that the residents and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 2. Resident #79 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the State mental health authority for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II was implemented for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #20, (R20). Findings: 1.Review of R20's PASRR Level II, dated 2/25/25, indicated R20 was approved for specialized services to include Initial psychiatric evaluation to determine diagnosis and develop plan of care. Review of R20's care plan, updated 2/16/25 states: Resident/Patient meets PASRR II Level of care with diagnosis of Bipolar and Anxiety: Serious Mental Illness: Resident/Patient will receive appropriate specialized services as indicated on PASRR Level II thru next review date. Resident will be offered/engage with behavioral health services. Resident will engage/ be offered counseling services to develop coping skills. Review of Resident #20's current orders, dated 3/2025 lacked evidence that an order was placed for Medi tele (psyche services). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #41). Finding: Review of Resident #41's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment was completed on 1/6/25. Further review of the clinical record lacked evidence that an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting was held within 7 days following the assessment. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 8:37 a.m., the Director of Social Services confirmed Resident #41's last IDT meeting was held 11/13/24 and that Resident #41's clinical record lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days of the MDS Quarterly assessment.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to the storage of an unlabeled medicated cream and chemicals being properly secured for 2 of 2 observations for 1 of 4 days of survey. (3/18/25) Findings: The Safety Data Sheet for Clinical Silicone Cream noted the following: 4. First Aid Measures: Eye Contact: Flush eyes with large amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. Remove contact lenses, if worn. If irritation, seek medical attention. Skin Contact: If irritation develops, wash area with water. Get medical attention if irritation persists. Inhalation: Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. Seek medical attention if discomfort continues or if you feel unwell. Ingestion: Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. Consult a physician if necessary. The Safety Data Sheet for FunkAway Beads Odor Eliminator noted the following: 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate evidence of monitoring for mood, behavior, and side effects of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (#10). Findings: A review of Resident #10's clinical, Physician orders included the following medications: Risperidone (an antipsychotic) 2 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day; Lithium carbonate (used as a mood stabilizer) 300 mg by mouth twice daily; Lamotrigine (an anticonvulsant used as a mood stabilizer) 250 mg by mouth twice daily, and Trazodone (an antidepressant) 100 mg once daily to treat insomnia. Resident #10's care plan, last revised 2/6/25, identified the risk for complications related to the use of psychotherapeutic medication. Interventions included Monitor for side effects and consult physician and/or pharmacist as needed. Report the continued need of medication as related to behavior and mood. Also identified, Resident #10 exhibits or is at risk for distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms. Interventions included, Observe for signs/symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the plan of correction, and interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure that the plan of correction for identified deficiencies from the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process for Federal Recertification on 2/1/24 was effective. The deficiencies, F689 (Free of Accident Hazards/ Supervision/Devices) was again identified during the 8/14/24 and 8/15/24 Revisit Survey. Findings: During the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process for Federal Recertification survey, dated 2/1/24, a deficiency was cited at F689 (Free of Accident Hazards/ Supervision/Devices) for failure to ensure that the residents environment was free from the potential risk of accidents relating to unsecured faux wood flooring for 1 of 3 units([NAME]) for 1 of 1 observations. The facility's Plan of Correction for F689, with a completion date of 3/13/24, indicated that an audit will be conducted for the remaining units to ensure all flooring is secured down, The floor flooring will be inspected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement/Quality Assurance Assessment (QAPI/QAA) Committee meeting attendance sheets and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director attended 3 of 4 quarterly meetings. Finding: A review of the quarterly QAPI/QAA meeting attendance sheets indicate that the Medical Director did not attend the 9/25/23, 12/20/23, and 3/14/24 quarterly meetings. A review of the facility's policy, Center Quality Assurance Performance Improvement process, with a revision date of 10/24/22, stated, Process. 2. The QAA Committee: 2.1. Functions under the authority of the Administrator and the governing Body and is composed of 2.1.1 Administrator, 2.1.2 Director of Nursing, 2.1.3 Medical Director, 2.1.4 Infection Preventionist, or designee, 2.1.5 Consultant Pharmacist (recommended), 2.1.6 Patient and/or family representatives (if appropriate), 2.1.7 Three (3) additional staff representatives, including, but not limited to department heads, certified nursing assistants, rehabilitation services, hospice, home health, etc.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable homelike environment on 2 of 3 units observed during complaint investigations ([NAME] and [NAME] House). Findings: Observations of [NAME] House between [DATE] at 8:21 a.m. and [DATE] at 10:26 a.m., revealed the following: On [DATE] at 8:21 a.m., during an initial tour two surveyors noted a very strong odor resembling a litter box in the hall starting at the Beauty Parlor located at the end of the main corridor and continuing onto all halls of the [NAME] and [NAME] Houses. On [DATE] at 9:45 a.m., during a facility tour Regional Ombudsman (OMB), indicated that both [NAME] and [NAME] Houses have had a very strong urine odor and [NAME] has also had a strong musty odor for quite some time At this time OMB further indicated she's asked the facility management multiple times what their plan was to fix it and never received an answer. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:17 a.m., Clinical Research Coordinator (MDS) indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all direct care staff received training in effective communication skills reflecting the needs of the resident population served, for 2 of 5 employee education records reviewed (#2, #5) Finding: A review of the Facility Assessment for 2024-2025, revealed the facility frequently provides care to residents with cognitive impairments, neurological and psychiatric conditions, as well as sensory impairments. The assessment stated the facility strives to provide person-centered care and psychosocial, spiritual support so that the needs of emotional and mental well-being, (and) support for helpful coping mechanisms are met. A review of staff education records for the past year lacked evidence that employees #2 and #5 had received training regarding effective communication. On 8/20/24 at 3:50 p.m., in an interview with two surveyors, the Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the finding.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff received mandatory training on it's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), which included the staff's role and communication with the program, for 2 of 5 employee files reviewed (#2, #5). Finding: Review of the facility's Center Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process policy, with a revision date of 10/24/22, stated Process. 2.11 The QAA (Quality Assurance and Assessment) Committee promotes full employee participation in identifying and improving key processes. 2.11.1 Ensures education for all staff to facilitate understanding of QAPI program and processes, and systems to engage staff in participation in identifying improvement opportunities and participating in PI (Performance Improvement) teams. 2.11.2 Assures QAPI program and processes are presented at staff orientation and at annual mandatory inservice programs. A review of employee education files lacked evidence that employees #2 and #5 received annual mandatory training regarding the facility's QAPI program. On 8/21/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure it's standards, policies and procedures for it's Compliance and Ethics program were communicated to all staff, for 2 of 5 employee files reviewed (#2, #4). Finding: A review of employee education files lacked evidence that employees #2 and #4 received annual mandatory training regarding the facility's Compliance and Ethics program. On 8/21/24 at 3:50 p.m., in an interview with two surveyors, the Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the finding.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote a resident's dignity for 1 of 4 resident sampled for hygiene (Resident #1). Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to facility on 9/6/22 with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 8 of 15 indicating he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of MDS revealed Resident was dependent of staff for her activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of Resident#1's care plan initiated 9/6/22 revealed [Resident #1] is at risk for decreased ability to perform ADL(s) in grooming, personal hygiene, requires 1 person extensive assist with bathing, and grooming . During observation of breakfast meal on [NAME] House on 5/28/24 at 8:20 a m., Resident #1 was observed sitting at dining room table with a significant amount of facial hair that appeared to be approximatley 1/2 inch in length. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure that accommodations were made for residents that included call bell and telephone being within reach for a resident that is capable of using a call bell and telephone for 1 of 1 resident observed for accommodations (Resident #2). Findings: Observations of Resident #2 between 5/28/24 at 8:10 a.m., through 5/29/24 at 7:35 a.m., revealed the following: -On 5/28/24 at 8:10 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in bed with with his/her side table positioned over the bed. A piece of paper was noted with large print indicating names and phone numbers. Residents #2's telephone was noted lying on a wheelchair cushion located to left of resident and not in reach. Call bell was observed to be dangling from Resident #2's right bedside rail, not in reach. -On 5/28/24 at 10:02 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in bed with with his/her side table positioned over the bed. A piece of paper was noted with large print indicating names and phone numbers. Residents #2's telephone was noted lying on a wheelchair cushion located to left of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure provider documentation of resident needs that cannot be met and facility attempts to meet those needs during a facility initiated discharge for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #4). Finding: On 5/10/24 the Department of Licensing & Certification received a complaint indicating on 5/9/24 Resident #4 was transferred to an acute care hospital and the facility refused to take [him/her] return, because they are unable to provide the appropriate level of care for this resident. Review of Resident #4's medical record reveals he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and encephalopathy. Review of intake Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 of 15 indicating Resident #4 was significantly impaired. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed progress note dated 5/9/24 stating: ''It was brought to my attention from upper management that I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of significant change in condition for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for significan change in condition (Residents #2 and #3). Findings: 1.On 2/20/24 at 9:08 a.m., the Department of Licensing received a complaint indicating Resident #2 had been complaining about abdominal pain all day. After family intervention Resident #2 was transferred to an acute care hospital and underwent surgery for a perforated bowel and splenectomy. Resident #2 was admitted to facility on 3/13/23 with diagnoses to include morbid severe obesity, constipation, and history of small bowel obstruction with resection in 2011. Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed Nursing Documentation dated 1/27/24 at 4:45 p.m., stating Patient complaining of abdominal pain in the morning. Patient received [Malox] and had a large BM. Patient still complaining of pain. Given tums. Patient did not eat lunch. VSS. [Borborgamy] [ rumbling sounds] in all four quadrants. Daughter and daughter in law came in and requested patient go to ED for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, interviews the facility failed to update/implement a care plan in the area of constipation for 1 of 1 care plan reviewed (Resident #2). Findings: Resident #2 was admitted to facility on 3/13/23 with diagnoses to include severe morbid obesity, constipation, and history of small bowel obstruction with restriction in 2011. Review of Residents 2's care plan initiated 3/5/23 lacked evidence that goals and interventions were put in place for constipation. During an interview 5/29/24 at 12:32 p.m., Marketing Clinical Advisor and a surveyor reviewed Resident #2's care plan and confirmed no goals /interventions were put in place for constipation.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for documentation (Resident's #1 and #2, #3 & #5). Findings: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) dated 5/1/23 states Documentation of ADL care is recording in the medical record and is reflective of the care provided by nursing staff. ADL care will be documented in real time . ADL care is documented every shift by the nursing assistant. 1. Review of Resident #1's clinical record Tasks dated May 2024 lacked evidence that Resident #1 received assistance with toileting during the day shift on 5/6/24, 5/11/24 or 5/28/24,during the evening shift on 5/10/24 and 5/28/24 or during the night shift on 5/1/24, 5/5/24, 5/10/24 5/18/24 or 5/24/24. Further review of Resident #1's Task dated May 2024 lacked evidence that Resident #1 received hygiene assistance during the day shift on 5/6/24, 5/11/24, or 5/28/24. During the evening shift on 10/10/24, or during the night shift on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0843 — isolatedHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to demonstrate a good faith effort to secure a written transfer agreement with a local hospital to ensure the safe and orderly transfer of residents for care and treatment. Finding: On 8/20/24 at 1:50 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator stated she was unable to locate a written transfer agreement with the local hospital which was approved for participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The Administrator stated she had contacted the office of the hospital's President and was told there was no written transfer agreement and that it was not needed by the hospital. The Administrator confirmed that she was told there had only been a verbal agreement between the facility and the hospital for the transfer of residents. The local hospital was noted to be 1.2 miles from the facility. The Administrator provided a copy of the transfer agreement with the next closest hospital, 17 miles away from the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment related to the storage of personal toiletries, and urine collection devices for 1 of 3 units observed ([NAME] House). Findings: On 5/28/24 at 8:20 a.m., 11:12 a.m. and 5/29/24 at 7:15 a.m., observervations of room [ROOM NUMBER] shared bathroom belonging to Resident's #3 and #8 revealed a wooden shelf containing an unlabeled and unbagged bedpan, 1 opened and unlabeled bottle of body lotion,1 unlabeled bottle of men's 3 in 1 wash, and 1 opened and unlabeled bottle of mouthwash available for use. On 5/28/24 at 11:43 a.m., and 5/29/24 at 7:16 a.m., shared bathroom belonging to Rooms 45/46: contained unlabeled, unbagged bed pan on floor behind toilet, visible debris around toilet base, 8 oz bottle of cleansing spray, and 2.5 oz bottle of hand cream observed on shelf, available for use. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 11:45 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN)1 indicated that resident personal belongings should be labeled and stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 employee files reviewed (#2) contained evidence of training to meet the residents' behavioral health care needs. Finding: A review of the Facility Assessment for 2024-2025, noted its population profile includes a high frequency of residents admitted with neurological, cognitive, and psychiatric/mood conditions. Functional care requirements for mental health states manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals with depression, trauma/PTSD, other psychiatric diagnoses, intellectual or developmental disabilities. A review of the facility's policy, Behaviors: Management of Symptoms, with a revision date of 7/1/24, stated Center staff, including contracted staff and volunteers, shall receive education to ensure appropriate competencies and skill sets for meeting behavioral health needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent cross contamination and/or development of infection by maintaining a safe and sanitary environment related linen handling, urinary collection devices and sharps/needle safety for 1 of 1 days of survey on 1 of 3 units ([NAME] House). Findings: On 2/27/24 at 8:43 a.m., during observation of [NAME] House, the following was observed: 1. Observation of a Laundry Aid delivering linens to the [NAME] house dining room using an uncovered wire cart. She removed the tablecloths and placed them into the [NAME] in the dining room. At this time, she confirmed she was delivering clean tablecloths stating, now that I'm thinking about it, I should've covered it with a sheet. Review of the facility policy, Linen Handling, revised 5/1/23 states, All linen will be handled, stored, transported, and processed to contain and minimize exposure to waste products. Instructions to: Keep clean linen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, the facility's Dish Machine Logs, Food Storage-Cold Goods Policy and Procedure last revised 4/2018, Food Storage-Dry Goods Policy and Procedure last revised 9/2017, and Refrigerated/Frozen Storage Policy and Procedure last revised 6/15/18, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for air conditioning units, vents, a mixer, the ice machine, shelving, a reach-in freezer, a walk-in refrigerator and dry storage for 1 of 1 kitchen tour. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that the dish machine was maintaining proper temperature ranges for proper cleaning and sanitizing. This has the potential to effect all residents. Findings: The facility's Dish Machine Logs state at the bottom under Standards: high temp: wash: 150 to 160°F, rinse: 180°F. If temperature or chemical concentration does not meet parameters, stop washing and alert a manager or designee. The facility's Food Storage: cold foods revised 4/2018 states under Procedures: 5. All foods will be stored wrapped in or covered containers, labeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition for 3 of 3 Units ([NAME] House, [NAME] House & [NAME] House) and the Laundry Findings: On 2/1/24, from 2:10 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., a surveyor did an environmental tour with the Interim Administrator, the Regional Maintenance Director, and the Housekeeper Supervisor in which the following findings were was observed: [NAME] House > The resident Hoyer lift had chipped/missing paint on the legs creating uncleanable surfaces. > The resident sit-to-stand lift has dried food and dirt/debris in the foot base. >Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The cove base was dirty and marred with black marks. The closet door, to the left and right of the sink was marred with black marks. The heater was marred with black marks. The floor around the base of the toilet was dirty. There was a commode bucket on the bathroom floor. > Resident room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview's and record review's, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 2 of 39 sampled residents (#22, #52). Findings: 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #22's clinical record included a diagnoses of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, prostate cancer with urinary retention which required an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #22's baseline care plan, initiated 12/29/23 only addressed the resident's need for assistance with mobility. The interventions specified the need for the head of bed to be elevated, and physical and occupational therapy screens. No other information was provided. On 1/3/24 and 1/4/24, the care plan was updated to address Resident #22's needs regarding activities of daily living, risk for cardiovascular complications, indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a continuous resident centered activities program. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that would normally participate in activities. Findings: On 2/1/24 at 11:30 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Activities Staff stated no scheduled activities were provided on weekends since September/October of 2023, when the weekend activities staff position was eliminated. Staff stated if there is a special occasion, they will flex their weekday hours and work 1-2 hours on a weekend day for a special event. Otherwise, no group activities, including church services, are held on weekends. The Activities Staff stated they set up recreation carts with self-directed activities available in the dining room of each unit. Staff stated there are no activities, other than tv, for residents who cannot participate independently. A review of the February 2024 Activities Calendar revealed the only weekend activity scheduled was a 2-hour Superbowl social on 2/11/24. On 2/1/24 at 11:45 a.m., the finding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside on 3 of 3 units. (#3, #7, #14, #27, #29, #52, #55, #69, #79 & #291) Findings: 1. On 1/29/24 at approximately 12:15 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor Resident #3 indicated that he/she does not receive his/her showers as requested for Fridays. A review of the shower schedule showed that Resident #3 was scheduled for showers or whirlpool baths on Fridays. A review of CNA documentation for October 2023 - January 2023 indicated that he/she only received a shower on Saturday 11/18/23, Tuesday, 11/28/23, and Saturday 1/20/24. 2. On 1/29/24 at 11:31 a.m., during an interview with Resident #7. Surveyor asked do you get the help you need without waiting a long time? Resident #7 stated No, there's not enough staff. I've been going without baths and can't recall the last time I had a shower. A review of ADL documentation indicates that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on performance evaluations and interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least every 12 months for 3 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA #1, CNA #3, and CNA #5). Findings: 1. CNA #1 was hired on 12/20/21. CNA #1's last performance evaluation was completed in 2022. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluation for 2023. 2. CNA #3 was hired on 6/29/21. CNA #3's last performance evaluation was completed in 2022. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluation for 2023. 3. CNA #5 was hired on 4/4/16. CNA #5's last performance evaluation was completed in 2022. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluation for 2023. On 2/01/24 at 8:25 a.m., in an interview, the Interim Administrator confirmed that the facility lacked documentation of 2023 yearly performance evaluations for CNAs #1, #3 and #5.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 12 of 39 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (#7, #14, #22, #27, #28, #29, #30, #32, #43, #52 & #69), and for 2 of 39 residents reviewed for medication and treatment administration (#14, #22). Findings: 1. A review of Resident #7's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation of activities of daily living (ADLs) for October 2023 - January 2024, revealed multiple days lacking documentation on multiple shifts as follows: October 2023 Bed Mobility: 11 out of 31 days Eating: 11 out of 31 days Bathing: 11 out of 31 days November 2023 Bathing: 20 out of 30 days December 2023 Bathing: 24 out of 31 days Eating: 21 out of 31 days January 2024 Bathing: 16 out of 29 days 2. Resident #14's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/6/23. A review of Resident #14's CNA documentation of ADL's for December 2023 and January 2024, revealed multiple days lacking documentation on multiple shifts as follows: December 2023 Bathing - 21 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control standards for residents requiring transmission-based precautions (TBPs) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (#31, #35, #198), and failed to ensure staff received appropriate education regarding TBPs. 1. 0n 1/30/24, a review of the clinical record revealed Resident #31 had a current physician order that noted: contact precautions for urine only. staff should wear gloves with attends changes and goggles should splash from a bed pan or commode be possible. ESBL[Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase] in urine. Other Active 10/30/2023 0n 1/30/24 at 2:00 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #31's room and there was no personal protective equipment (PPE) station and no sign informing those entering the room that enhanced barrier precautions were required. 0n 1/30/24 at 2:30 p.m., in an interview, the Director of Nursing and the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that Resident #31 had ESBL and there should be an enhanced barrier precaution sign on the door and PPE available for staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and he facility's Dish Machine Logs, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen high temperature dish washing machine was maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen tours (1/29/24). From October 2023 to February 2024, the kitchen high temperature dish washing machine was no consistently reaching proper wash and rinse/sanitizing temperatures. Findings: The facility's Dish Machine Logs state at the bottom under Standards: high temp: wash: 150 to 160°F, rinse: 180°F. If temperature or chemical concentration does not meet parameters, stop washing and alert a manager or designee. 0n 1/29/24 between 9:15 a.m. to 9:40 a.m., during an initial kitchen tour, a surveyor asked dietary aides #1 and #2 please run the dish machine 3 times in a row. The first wash was 140 degrees Fahrenheit(F.) and the rinse was 160 degrees F. The second wash was 144 degrees F. and the rinse was 162 degrees F. The third wash was 144 degrees F. and the rinse was 160 degrees F. The surveyor asked dietary aide #1 and dietary aide #2 if they knew…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to develop or implement the care plan interventions for the residents' current needs for residents requiring transmission-based precautions (TBPs) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#31). Finding: 0n 1/30/24, a review of the clinical record revealed Resident #31 had a current physician order that noted: contact precautions for urine only. staff should wear gloves with attends changes and goggles should splash from a bed pan or commode be possible. ESBL[Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase] in urine. Other Active 10/30/2023 0n 1/30/24 at 2:00 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #31's room and there was no personal protective equipment (PPE) station and no sign informing those entering the room that enhanced barrier precautions were required. A review of Resident #31's current care plan did not include enhanced barrier precautions for Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase(ESBL). 0n 1/30/24 at 2:30 p.m., in an interview, the Director of Nursing and the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that Resident #31 had ESBL and there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment was free from the potential risk of accidents relating to faux wood flooring for 1 of 3 units([NAME]) for 1 of 1 observations. Findings: On 1/30/24 at 8:15 a.m., on the [NAME] Unit, a surveyor observed the faux wood flooring moving and coming up when carts were pushed down the hallway and staff were walking down the hallway. On 1/30/24 at 8:30 a.m., observations were made on the [NAME] Unit by a surveyor, the Interim Administrator and the Regional Maintenance Director to observe the flooring. The Administrator confirmed that there were ambulating residents on the unit and that the loose and moving sections of flooring were not secured to the floor, were definitely an accident hazard for residents and staff. Both the Interim Administrator and the Regional Maintenance Director were able to pick different sections of the flooring up which were loose and not secured down. Further observation of the [NAME] Unit by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to recognize and address a potential significant weight change for 1 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for nutritional status (#52). Finding: A review of the facility's policy for Weights and Heights, stated Patients are weighed upon admission and/or re-admission, then weekly for four weeks and monthly thereafter. Hospital weight will not serve as admission or re-admission weight. A review of Resident #52's electronic clinical record indicated an admission date of 12/6/23. Resident #52's weight on 12/6/23 was recorded as 254 pounds. On 12/25/23, nineteen days later, Resident #52's weight was recorded as 224 pounds, revealing a potential 30-pound weight loss. Further review of Resident #52's clinical record lacked evidence of weekly weight monitoring for 12/13/23 and 12/20/23. There was no evidence staff followed up on Resident #52's potential 30-pound weight loss. On 1/31/24 at 10:24 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that staff did not follow the facility's policy by using the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receive such services, consistent with the professional standards of practice in the area of monitoring a dialysis catheter site from 10/4/2023 to 2/1/24, for 1 of 1 resident receiving dialysis (#69). Finding: On 2/1/24 at 11:15 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, Resident #69 stated that he/she goes to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The surveyor observed Resident #69 with a dressing to the left chest. Resident #69 stated that is what they use for dialysis right now but he/she will be getting a fistula soon. A review of Resident #69's clinical record revealed diagnoses which included, Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitis, and Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 5. Documentation on Resident #69's hospital Discharge Documentation dated 10/2/23, indicated that on 9/28/23, Resident #69 had a placement of a tunneled dialysis catheter. A review of Resident #69's current care plan was completed. There is no mention that the resident has a tunneled dialysis catheter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program which includes, at a minimum, training on abuse, resident rights and dementia management by failing to ensure that 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) employed, completed the required annual training (CNA #1). Findings: On 1/31/24, during a review of employee personnel records, the following was noted: 1. CNA #1's employee personnel record lacks evidence of mandatory abuse, resident rights and dementia training within the last twelve months. On 1/31/24 at 1:15 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that there was no facility documentation to show that CNA #1 received the mandatory abuse, resident rights and dementia training within the last twelve months.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition, on 3 of 3 Units ([NAME], [NAME] and [NAME]) and in the laundry room, for 1 of 1 environmental tour. Findings: On 3/17/22 from 8:20 a.m. to 8:50 a.m., an Environmental Tour was done with the Interim Center Executive Director, the Maintenance Director, the Director of Senior Maintenance of Health Care Service Group(HCSG) and the Maintenance Assistant in which the following were observed: [NAME] Unit: > The hallway ceiling, outside the nurse's station, had a large patch on it with a hole directly next to the patch. There was also a hole in the ceiling about 1 foot from the patch. [NAME] Unit: > The whirlpool room, across from the clean linen closet, had a dirty/dusty ceiling exhaust vent and had a dirty floor around the base of the toilet. > The whirlpool room near room [ROOM NUMBER] had a dirty/dusty ceiling exhaust vent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement Infection Control Contact Precautions for a resident diagnosed with an antibiotic resistant bacteria for 1 of 3 sampled resident receiving an antibiotic. Finding: On 3/15/22, a review of documentation in Resident #120's clinical record, in the nurse's note section, stated the resident had an indwelling Foley catheter. On a Physician progress note, dated 3/10/22, the Physician stated the resident had hematuria (blood in the urine) and was treated with the antibiotic-Augmentin. The facility was waiting for a culture and sensitivity of the urine. A review of the nurse's note, dated 3/11/22 at noon, stated Resident #120's urine culture results showed Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL), a germ that produces an enzyme that makes it harder to treat with antibiotics. The Physician Assistant was contacted for new orders. Documentation on the nurse's note, dated 3/11/22 at 1:00 p.m., the Augmentin was discontinued and Resident #120 was started on a new medication, Cipro 500 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, personnel files review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow its own policies to ensure a Maine background check was completed for new employees before they are permitted to work for 1 of 6 sampled employees (Employee #1). Findings: The facility's 2.0 Abuse Prohibition Policy, revised 8/1/16 states that, The Facility shall screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreating residents . On 3/16/22, a surveyor requested and received 6 randomly sampled employee personnel files to review from the Center Nurse Executive. On 3/16/22, Employee #1's personnel record was reviewed by a surveyor. The personnel record lacked evidence that a Maine background check was completed. Employee #1's date of hire is 2/28/22. On 3/16/22 at 2:45 p.m., a surveyor confirmed with the Workforce Manager that a Maine background check was not completed for Employee #1 until 3/16/22, 16 days after hire date. The Workforce Manager stated, a Maine background check is done prior to being hired and, this was a transfer from another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation of resident abuse/neglect was reported to the state agency within 24 hours when an incident occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. (#33). Findings: On 10/20/21, the facility made a report to Licensing and Certification that indicated the following: On 10/16/21 at 7:00 a.m., a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported Resident #33 was complaining of pain. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) asked the Certified Nursing Assistant/Medication Technician (CNA/M) if Resident #33 could have as needed (PRN) pain medication. The CNA/M asked the charge nurse if Resident #33 could have as needed pain medication. The CNA/M and the charge nurse returned to Resident #33's room. There, the charge nurse stated that it would be best if the resident waited for his/her scheduled pain medication due at 9:00 a.m. The resident was alert and oriented at that time. The report indicated that Resident #33 appeared to be in a lot of pain at that time. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview , the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was initiated, developed and completed based on the comprehensive assessment in the areas of Cognitive Loss/Dementia, ADL Functional/Rehab Potential, Urinary Incontinence, Psychosocial Well-Being, Falls, Nutritional Status, Dental Care, Pressure Ulcer/Injury and Psychotropic Drug Use for 1 of 13 sampled (#21). Findings: Documentation on Resident #21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment dated [DATE], under Care Area Assessment Summary, noted Resident #21 would be care planned for Cognitive loss/Dementia, ADL's, Communication, Incontinence, Psychosocial Well-Being, Falls, Nutritional Status, Dental Care, Pressure ulcer and Psychotropic Drug use. As of 3/16/22, Resident #21's medical record lacked evidence of a Comprehensive Care plan being initiated, developed and completed. On 3/16/22 at 11:25 a.m., in an interview, the Center Nurse Executive(CNE) confirmed that a comprehensive care plan had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a resident's current care plan to reflect the resident's Physician order/intervention to monitor restricted fluid intake for 1 of 2 sampled residents with fluid restriction (Resident #31). Finding: Documentation in Resident #31's clinical record, in the Physician order section, stated the resident had an order, dated 3/1/22, to Monitor Daily Fluid Restriction Total 2000 ml (must match diet order); Breakfast tray 480 ml; Free Fluids day shift 220 ml; Lunch tray 480 ml; Free Fluids Evening Shift 220 ml; Dinner tray 480 ml; Free Fluids Night Shift 120 ml. A review of Resident #31's current care plan, dated 1/9/22 was done. Under the care plan problem of Resident at risk for fluid volume excess, there was no intervention addressing the Physician's order to monitor fluid intake. On 3/16/22 at 12:45 p.m., in an interview with the Center Nurse Executive, she confirmed with the surveyor that she was unable to find evidence that monitoring of the residents fluid intake was added as an intervention on the care plan.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow a Physician order for fluid intake restriction for 1 of 2 sampled residents on a fluid restriction (Resident #31) Finding: A review of Resident #31's clinical record, in the Physician order section, stated the resident had an order, dated 3/1/22, to Monitor Daily Fluid Restriction Total 2000 ml (must match diet order); Breakfast tray 480 ml; Free Fluids day shift 220 ml; Lunch tray 480 ml; Free Fluids Evening Shift 220 ml; Dinner tray 480 ml; Free Fluids Night Shift 120 ml. On 3/16/22 at 12:04 p.m., in an interview with Resident #31, he/she stated staff do not keep track of his/her fluid intake and that he/she just kind of knows how much he/she can have. On 3/16/22 at 12:20 p.m., in an interview with the [NAME] Unit Charge Nurse, she stated she was unable to find any evidence that Resident #31's fluids had been monitored. She stated there was no documentation on the Treatment Administration Record or the Medication Administration Record. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide an adaptive utensil, a small red curved spoon, for a Resident during 2 of 3 meals observed (3/14/22, and 3/16/22) (Residents #57). Findings: 1. On 3/14/22 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #57 was observed by a surveyor eating a pureed meal. The resident was using his/her knife to scoop up and eat the food. A surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA #1) about the resident eating with a knife, and she said she would go and check on him/her. Resident #57's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] stated, Resident #57 receiving adaptive equipment (small, curved spoon) to aid self-feeding. Resident #57's Care plan, updated on 2/22/22 stated under interventions, Provide rehab eating devices during meals. 2. On 3/16/22 at 12:22 p.m., Resident #57 was observed by a surveyor eating a pureed meal. The resident was using his/her knife to scoop up and eat the food. A surveyor asked CNA #1 where the adaptive utensil was for the resident. The CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a wall fan, an ice scoop/ice machine, air conditioners and plate covers. This was for 1 of 1 kitchen tours on 1 of 4 days of survey (3/14/22). Findings: On 3/14/22 from 11:15 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the District Manager for HealthCare Services for food related services in which the following findings were observed: > The dish room wall fan by the dish washer was dusty/dirty. > The ice scoop was stored in the ice inside the ice machine bin. > The ceiling mounted air conditioner unit over the 3 bay pot sink was dusty/dirty. > The ceiling mounted air conditioner unit over a food preparation area was dusty/dirty. > There were 2 stacks of plates covers, approximately 10 in each stack, that had been wet stacked. On 3/14/22 at 11:45 a.m., in an interview, the District Manager for HealthCare Services for food related services confirmed the findings.
- No harm found · B2025-03-24 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice to a resident or their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 2 of 6 Resident's reviewed for hospitalization (Resident # [R66] and [R10]). Findings: 1. Review of [R66]'s clinical record revealed he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital and subsequently admitted from 2/11/25 through 2/18/25 and from 3/9/25 through 3/15/25. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written discharge/transfer notice to include appeal rights to the resident and/or resident representative. During an interview on 3/21/25 at 8:20 a.m., Resident [R66] stated he/she remembered going to the hospital clearly each time, but state he/she was not provided with a written transfer notice. During an interview with Director of Nursing and Market Clinical Advisor (MCA) on 3/21/25 at 8:25 a.m., the MCA stated they have been doing audits to make sure the transfer notices are filled out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue written bed hold notices to include cost of care to the resident and /or legal representative for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for transfer to an acute care hospital. (Resident #10[R10] and #66[R66]). Findings: 1.Review of [R66] clinical record revealed he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital and subsequently admitted from 2/11/25 through 2/18/25 and from 3/9/25 through 3/15/25. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written bed hold notice that included cost of care for these hospitalizations. During an interview on 3/21/25 at 8:20 a.m. [R66] stated he/she remembered going to the hospital clearly each time, but state he/she was not provided with a written bed hold notice that included cost of care. During an interview with Director of Nursing and Market Clinical Advisor (MCA) on 3/21/25 at 8:25 a.m., the MCA stated they have been doing audits to make sure the bed hold notices are filled out but have not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice for a facility initiated transfer/discharge to a resident, or his/her legal representative, for 2 of 6 sampled residents transferred to an acute care facility (#7, #191). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident #7s clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital and admitted on [DATE], and returned to the facility on 1/15/24. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written bed hold policy/notice to the resident and/or legal representative for the transfer. On 2/1/24 at 1:55 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that a bed hold notice was not provided at the time of transfer to the hospital. 2. Documentation in Resident #191's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital and admitted on [DATE], and returned to the facility on 1/26/24. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,056 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $14,056 — penalty dated 2024-05-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-29 for 29 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-27 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE OF MAINE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/02/2012 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2008 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/31/2011 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MATONES, LAURA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/25/2025 |
| STEVENSON, MEGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/25/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205091. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.