Las Palomas Center
8100 Palomas Avenue Ne, Albuquerque, NM 87109 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (505) 821-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0610) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (88) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $294,513 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-05)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.2% | 11.3% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 0.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.6% | 2.0% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.3% | 11.7% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.3% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 5.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.9% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.7% | 86.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.3% | 22.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.9% | 15.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.41 | 1.65 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.88 | 2.81 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.7%CMS range 40.7–66.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.3–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 32.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 18.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.2–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 97.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
88 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 71 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to properly intervene and prevent a Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) from touching and interacting inappropriately with multiple residents over multiple times for 4 (R #17, 46, 96, and 120) of 4 (R #17, 46, 96, and 120) residents who were reviewed for possible abuse. If staff do intervene and take steps to prevent abuse, then other residents are at risk of abuse which may cause physical, emotional, and psychological harm. The findings are: R #96A. Record review of R #96's face sheet, dated 09/04/25, revealed an admission date of 09/07/24 with the following diagnoses: Cerebral (brain) Infarction (stroke),Monoplegia (paralysis of one limb) of lower limb left side,Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),Dysphonia (difficulty speaking). B. Record review of R #96's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a collection of assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated 06/27/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS; a simple test of mental/Memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-11-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate multiple allegations of abuse. The facility then failed to take steps to prevent any future abuse of 4 (R #17, 46, 96 and 120) out of 4 (R #17, 46, 96 and 120) residents reviewed for abuse. If staff do not investigate allegations of abuse and take steps to prevent abuse, then other residents are at risk of abuse which may cause physical, emotional, and psychological harm. The findings are:R #96 A. Record review of R #96 face sheet, dated 09/04/25, revealed she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: -Cerebral (brain) Infarction (stroke), -Monoplegia (paralysis of one limb) of lower limb left side, -Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), -Dysphonia (difficulty speaking). B. Record review of R #96's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a collection of assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS; a simple test of mental/memory abilities), dated 06/27/25, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the highest level of care for 1 (R #1) of 8 (R #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) residents. The facility failed to provide consistent and adequate wound care (observation and care that promotes healing of wounds) to promote the healing of R #1's wounds. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving care that would promote the healing of resident's wounds. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet dated 10/30/25 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including:Acute (sudden onset) Osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone) of the left ankle and foot.Cutaneous (skin) Abscess (infectious material that has accumulated in tissues of the body) of Left Foot.Diabetes (a chronic disease caused by failure of the body to control blood sugars) with Chronic Kidney Disease.End Stage Renal Disease (chronic, progressive disease of the kidneys).Further review revealed R #1 was discharged from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-05 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to assure that the physician/provider reviewed and entered all orders for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident when the provider failed to review and enter an order upon admission to provide wound care. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not having adequate review and submission of treatment and medication orders resulting in less-than-optimal care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet dated 10/30/25 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including:Acute (sudden onset) Osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone) of the left ankle and foot.Cutaneous (skin) Abscess (infectious material that has accumulated in tissues of the body) of Left Foot.Diabetes (a chronic disease caused by failure of the body to control blood sugars) with Chronic Kidney Disease.End Stage Renal Disease (chronic, progressive disease of the kidneys).Further review revealed R #1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Findings related to R #7 L. Record review of the complaint allegation received by the State Agency on 01/09/25 revealed that during the holiday (Christmas), three different family members visited R #7 either in person of via Zoom and all three mentioned that her eyes were red, irritated and making R #7 uncomfortable. The cousin who visited in person alerted staff to this and they brought some eye drops. The complainant stated that she specifically requested care for R #7's eyes via email on 12/24/24 and 12/31/24 however there was no response until 01/07/25. M. On 02/15/25 at 12:33 pm during interview with R #7 when asked about her eyes being irritated, she stated Only thing I remember was they were cutting grass and the window was open. She confirmed that her eyes were itchy but it wasn't painful. R #7 remembered the symptoms only lasting one day. N. On 03/05/25 during interview with R #7's daughter, she stated that she her mother has stroke damage and struggles with short term memory loss. She reported that her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician for 2 (R #2 and #6) of 2 (R #2 and #6) residents reviewed when: 1. R #2 began having difficulty feeding herself with low meal intake percentages 2. R #6 developed a sacrum wound These deficient practices likely resulted in R #2 not getting the assistance she needed resulting in a decrease in meal intake and a delay in treatment and deterioration in R #6's wound likely resulting in the wound becoming septic. The findings are: Findings for R #2 A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's care plan dated 01/27/25 revealed the following: 1. R #2 exhibits impaired swallowing related to dementia; Provide assistance during meals and provide supervision during meals. 2. R #2 is a nutritional risk related to skin breakdown; Weigh per policy and as needed, and alert dietitian and physician to any significant weight loss or gain. C. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the admission Record for R36 found in the EMR located under the Profile tab indicated R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (an absence of oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily function), and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Review of the admission MDS admission assessment found in the EMR located under the MDS tab revealed an ARD of 04/22/24. The BIMS score was 15 out of 15, revealing intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan for R36 found in the EMR located under the Care Plan tab revealed a care plan for smoking dated 07/10/24 with an intervention of Monitoring patients' compliance to smoking policy. Review of the Smoking Evaluation for R36 found in the EMR located under the Assessment tab dated 07/10/24 indicated R36 could smoke independently and that R36 was made aware of the smoking policies, time, and location. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 9:56 AM, R36 was up in her motorized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to make prompt (done without delay; immediate) efforts to resolve resident's grievances for 1 (R # 6) of 1 (R # 6) resident reviewed by not responding/following up on grievances that involved resident to resident altercation after the grievance was reported to staff. If the facility is not ensuring that grievances are responded to and without delay, then residents are likely at risk of continued/repeaedt concerns and feeling as though their concerns are unimportant to the facility.The findings are: A. Record review of R #6 Minimum Data Set (MDS)- Section C- Cognitive Patterns dated 02/22/26 revealed that R #6 received a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.B. Record review of a grievance form dated 1/25/26 revealed that R #6 reported an altercation with R #5. An attached loose notebook note to the grievance form contained a statement from R #6 stated, R #5 has been messing with me all morning. He almost hit me for no reason. C. Record review of R#6 Progress notes dated 1/27/26 at 11:38 am, revealed that R #6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-02-09 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately discharge 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident when the facility failed to re-admit R #1 from the hospital and ensure coordination with an appropriate receiving facility so R #1's needs could be met after discharge from the hospital. This deficient practice resulted in R #1 being discharged to the hospital without a plan for her return to the facility and without appropriate coordination to ensure R #1's wellbeing and continuity of care following the hospital stay. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses (including but not limited to): 1. Cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to a part of the brain is obstructed). 2. Unspecified cerebrovascular disease. (various conditions that disrupt blood flow to the brain) 3. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following unspecified cerebrovascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow provider orders for 2 (R #3 and R#121) of 2 (R #3 and R#121) residents when staff failed:-Complete, relay and document weekly Prothrombin Time and International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) (a test administered to monitor and manage blood levels of Warfarin-a blood thinning medication) laboratory results for R #3. -Follow physician order for oxygen use for R#121. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are:R#3 A) On 9/3/25, record review of R 33's Physician's Orders revealed an order to check INR every Monday, call result to provider and enter nursing note with result, provider you spoke with, and any new orders received. B) Record review of R #3's daily nursing notes failed to show any documentation on 07/07/25, 07/14/25, 08/04/25, 08/11/25, 08/18/25, and 09/01/25 that INR was completed, recorded, provider notified and new orders. C) On 09/03/25 at 9:31 AM during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) for 3 (R #'s 5, 15, and 9) of 3 (R #'s 5, 15, and 9) residents reviewed for ADL care by staff failing to: Providing assistance for baths and showers.This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: R #5: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #5's care plan dated 07/18/25 revealed R #5 required ADL assistance for bathing due to R #5 having limited mobility and being legally blind. C. Record review of the facility's shower schedule revealed R #5's bath/showers were scheduled for Tuesdays and Fridays. D. Record review of R #5's documentation survey report (Activities of Daily Living - ADL tracking form), dated 06/01/25 through 06/30/25 revealed R #5 was offered/given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1(R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident when the facility failed to ensure the resident was not soiled while in the common areas for extended periods of time. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling as if they were unimportant and not having privacy. The findings are: A. On 08/25/25 at 10:00 am observation revealed R #1 seated in her wheelchair visibly wet from her lower shirt to knees, located at the south nursing station. Further observation revealed R #1 remained soiled in the common area for 15 minutes.B. On 08/25/25 at 10:15 am during an interview with R #1, she stated they do not care, I have to wear two briefs because the other ones do not hold enough, and they will not change me unless I ask.C. On 08/25/25 at 10:15 am during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4, he stated he would just take care of it, after R #1 asked him who was her assigned CNA. He stated he could see R #1 was wet. D. On 08/26/25 at 2:10 pm during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: 1. Food items were labeled and dated in the kitchen refrigerator and freezer. 2. Eggs should be refrigerated, kept cold or on ice when out of the refrigerator. 3. Floor in the facility freezer was clean (spilled milk) and free of debris (paper) These deficient practices are likely to affect all 95 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 06/02/25 and are likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 06/02/25 at 9:15 am during a walk through of the facility's kitchen revealed the following: 1. 2 large serving trays with what appeared to be pieces of cake were unlabeled and undated. 2. 3 bags of whipped topping were undated 3. 1 container of what appeared to be sugar was on the shelf unlabeled and undated 4. Pitcher of juice in the refrigerator was unlabeled and undated 5. A tray of what appeared to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care that met professional standards for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident when medications were administered which were contraindicated (medications that counteract each other) resulting in the resident experiencing diarrhea (a condition characterized by excessive and loose, watery bowel movements). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents being uncomfortable, developing skin damage and becoming dehydrated (a condition where the body loses more fluids than it takes in). The findings are: A. Record review of R #2 face sheet dated 06/05/25 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Aneurysm (a weak spot of the wall of an artery) of Iliac Artery (a major artery in the lower body that supplies oxygenated blood to the lower limbs). -Hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness of one side of the body) Left side B. Record review of R #2's provider orders revealed the following medication orders:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths and showers for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 06/02/25 at 10:30 AM during an interview with R #2, he stated that he was not receiving showers which he prefers and has requested showers. Instead, he has been given bed baths, and those are inconsistent. He further stated that he had not received a bed bath in about two weeks and that he cannot stand his own stench, which makes him feel like a pig. C. Record review of R #2's care plan dated 10/03/22 revealed, Focus: [Name of R #2] requires assistance for ADL care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to safeguard clinical record information by leaving Private Health Information (PHI) where unauthorized persons had access to it for the residents of Unit 1 and Unit 2 during random observations. If the resident's clinical information is not sufficiently safe guarded, resident's PHI is likely to be viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors, and staff. The findings are: A. On 06/02/25 at 8:50 AM, during a routine observation of Unit 1 nurses' station, a vital sign sheet was face-up on the counter, displayed the vital signs and names of all the residents in Unit 1. This information was visible to any unauthorized persons approaching the nurses' station. B. On 06/02/25 at 8:53 AM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, he confirmed that the vital sign sheet had been left face-up on the counter, making the information visible to all. He stated that it should have been placed face-down. C. On 06/02/25 at 9:17 AM, during a routine observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 (R #2) of 1(R #2) resident reviewed for food preference. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents consuming less food causing weight loss and malnutrition. The findings are: A. On 06/03/25 during observation of the meal service in the 120 hallway, meal trays arrived at the unit at 12:36 pm for the midday meal service. Meals were on trays that were being held in a tray cart that was closed. Staff began to serve the meals at 12:39 pm. The cart doors were opened and closed as meals were removed from the cart and taken to the assigned room. Each tray removed had a main plate that was covered by a warming cover. All trays were passed out by 12:41 pm. The last tray was held to serve as a test tray. B. On 06/03/25 at 12:44 pm during observation of the the 120 hallway, the Dietary Manager (DM) arrived to the area and he took the test tray from the cart and took the temperatures of the food contained on the test tray. The tray contained a hamburger, broccoli, tater…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 71 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were updated and accurate for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed. If resident medical records are not complete, accurate and up to date, then resident care may be delayed or duplicated. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet dated 06/05/25 revealed he was admitted to the facility on on 04/01/25. B. Record review of R #2's provider order dated 04/25/25 stated: give Imodium A-D (a medication that treats diarrhea (a condition of frequent watery stools) 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed. C. Record review of R #2's daily medication administration record (MAR) dated June 2025 revealed that on 06/03/25, no Imodium A-D had been given as of 06/03/25 at 12:00 pm when the MAR was reviewed. D. On 06/03/25 at 12:10 pm during interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2, she stated that she had given R #2 a dose of Imodium A-D during the morning medication pass at about 8:00 am. She reviewed the MAR and acknowledged the dose of Imodium A-D had not been documented. She stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that there was a coordinated plan of care for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for hospice services. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident not receiving the services that he needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs revealed the resident was on hospice care. B. On 06/02/25 at 12:25 PM during an interview with Hospice Registered Nurse (HRN) #1, he stated that hospice charting is done on a tablet and then printed and given to the facility. He further stated that a hospice binder was brought upon R #2's admission that contained the hospice coordinated plan of care and admitting documentation. C. On 06/03/25 at 8:34 AM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, she stated that the facility does not have hospice binders, and all hospice documentation is in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). D.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of all investigations of allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation and injuries of unknown source were submitted to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident. This deficient practice likely affects all residents identified on the facility census list. If the facility is not timely investigating allegations of abuse, then residents are at risk of further abuse. The findings are: A. Record review of notice sent to the facility Administrator by the State Survey Agency dated 11/27/24 identified that the 5 day follow up investigations were still pending despite efforts to reach out to the Administrator for (26) facility self reports in which the 5 day follow up investigation was not received. B. On 03/05/25 at 12:56 pm during interview with the facility Administrator and record review of facility self reports and 5 day investigation reports, he confirmed that he is the abuse coordinator and he is the only one responsible for reporting allegations of abuse to the state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a quality care that meets professional standards for 4 (R # 1, 2, 3 and 6) of 4 (R #1, 2, 3 and 6) residents when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure R #1's oxygen (O2) amount was provided as per physician orders. 2. Label and date O2 tubing per physician orders for R #1 and R #2. 3. Ensure there was a physician order for oxygen use before being provided to R #3. 4. Ensure there was a physician order before providing medication/treatment to R #6. If the facility is not following physician orders, then residents are at risk of adverse outcomes and inadequate monitoring of treatment. The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's physician orders dated [DATE] revealed an order for O2 at 5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (thin, flexible tube that provides O2 through ones nose) continuously. C. Record review of R #1's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Extended Survey Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a written, signed, and dated progress note from their physician after each visit for 8 ( R #'s 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) of 8 ( R #'s 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) residents reviewed for current physician progress notes and documentation. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident's records being incomplete and resident care not being documented and reviewed. The findings are: R #16 A. Record review of R #8 face sheet dated 04/09/25 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: -Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure. -Chronic Kidney Disease. -Difficulty walking. The face sheet also revealed that primary care provider (PCP) was a doctor of a senior service agency, not a provider connected to the facility. B. Record review of R #8 electronic medical record (EMR) for the past six months revealed there were no progress notes that had been submitted by the PCP or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY PAST NON-COMPLIANCE Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were monitored and administered as ordered for 1 (R #s 16) of 1 (R #s 16) resident reviewed for medications not given as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice can result in a resident receiving an excessive dose of the medications that could cause harm and possible death. The findings are: A. Record Review of R #16 face sheet dated 04/01/25 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: -Parkinson's (a chronic, progressive disease of the nervous system) Disease -Age-Related Physical Debility (age related decline of physical function) B. Record review of R #16 provider orders revealed the following orders: -03/10/25 Morphine Sulfate (a narcotic pain relieving medication) 20 mg (milligrams) per 5 ml (milliliter) oral (by mouth) solution. Give 1.3 ml every 4 hours for pain. -03/10/25 Morphine Sulfate 20mg/5ml oral solution. give 1.3 ml every two hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility administration failed to ensure a system of receiving timely response from the provider for 8 (R's #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18) of 8 (R's #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18) residents reviewed for physician communications. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving optimal care and the facility not have knowledge of physician plans and directives. Cross reference to F684 and F711 for further information A. Record review of R #8-15 revealed that each resident was being provided medical care through a senior service provider. B. On 04/02/25 at 12:10 pm during interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), stated that R #10 is one of several residents who are managed by a PCP who is not connected with the facility. She stated that the facility nurses must call this service for orders. DON stated that there have been times when the staff reported to her that the PCP from this service failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention) when performing wound care to 2 (R #4, #5) out of 2 (R #4, #5) residents. Failure to utilize enhanced barrier precautions when performing wound care has the potential to expose the residents to multidrug resistant organisms. The findings are: A. Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS') Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated 03/20/24, revealed the following: - MDRO transmission is common in long term care (LTC) facilities. - Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDRO that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. - EBP are indicated for residents with wounds, even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. B. Record review of R #4's medical record revealed the following: - admission date of 03/25/24. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean, in good condition, and free from clutter for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents sampled for a homelike environment by facility staff leaving a bag of soiled linens on the floor in front of the residents doorway. Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to result in unsafe conditions and prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's care plan dated 07/16/24 revealed R #1 required assistance with ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care such as bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, and toileting due to chronic disease related to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- when your heart can't pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply). B. On 02/14/25 at 11:55 am during an observation of R #1's room, a plastic bag filled with soiled linen was left on the floor in front of R #1's doorway. C. On 02/14/25 at 12:01 pm during an interview with Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference to F684 and F686. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #6) out of 1 (R #6) residents. If staff do not accurately reflect a resident's status in the MDS, then residents are at risk of not receiving the necessary care to maintain or improve their conditions. The findings are: A. Record review of R #6's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the following: - admission date of 11/13/24 from hospital. - Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS; a screening for cognitive impairment) score of 15, cognitively intact. - Diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis renal dialysis (the process of removing extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to function properly), and depression. - The resident was at risk of developing pressure ulcers (PU; an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 01/28/25. B. Record review of R #3's care plan dated 01/23/25 revealed the following care areas were care planned: 1. R #3 had an infection related to a Mutlidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO). 2. R #3 was at nutritional risk due to inadequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6) resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (a wound caused by prolonged pressure occurring in bony areas of the body) received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing when staff failed to perform wound care for multiple days. Failure to provide treatment for pressure ulcer could cause the wound to worsen and develop sepsis or osteomyelitis (bone infection.) The findings are: A. Record review of R #6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 11/19/24, revealed the following: - admission date of 11/13/24 from hospital. - Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS; a screening for cognitive impairment) score of 15, cognitively intact. - Diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis renal dialysis (the process of removing extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to function properly),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide the required assistance for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed during a random observation of meal time. This deficient practice could likely result in R #1 being at risk for aspiration (accidental inhale food or liquid into the lungs) and choking. The findings are: A. On 12/02/25 at 9:50 am during observation. R #1 ate his breakfast in bed. Staff were not present. B. On 12/02/25 at 10:04 am during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, he stated R #1 was able to feed himself; however, staff check on him to monitor his swallowing. LPN #1 stated R #1 did not require supervision while he ate. C. Record review of R #1's Care Plan, initiated 11/25/24, revealed R #1 was a nutritional risk due to need for thickened liquids and dependence on staff for feeding. Interventions included the following: 1. Feeding assist with all means in upright position. 2. Monitor for signs/symptoms of aspiration. D. Record review of R #1's Nutritional Assessment revealed the following: 1. Dated 08/05/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status when they did not: 1. Monitor R #1's meal intakes, 2. Ensure R #1 received his ordered nutritional supplement. This deficient practice could likely result in resident weight loss and adverse effects. The findings are: A. On 12/02/25 at 9:50 am during observation, R #1 ate breakfast in bed, and staff were not present. R #1 struggled to reach his tray, put food on the utensil, and move his beverage to his mouth. B. On 12/02/25 at 10:04 am during interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, he stated R #1 was able to feed himself; however, staff check on the resident to monitor his swallowing. LPN #1 stated R #1 did not require supervision while he ate. C. Record review of R #1's Care Plan, initiated 11/25/24, revealed R #1 was at nutritional risk due to the need for thickened liquids and dependence on staff for feeding. Interventions included the following: 1. Encourage resident to chew and swallow each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
PAST NON-COMPLIANCE Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 2 (R #2 and #3) of 2 (R #2 and #3) residents reviewed when a nurse removed the residents' oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) from the medication card for her own personal use. This deficient practice could likely result in a delay or residents not getting the care and treatment needed. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's self-report for medication diversion, dated 10/24/24, revealed a nurse removed discharged meds [medications] from the med cart and stated she would give them to the DON [Director of Nursing]. B. On 01/02/25 at 2:01 pm during interview with the Administrator and DON, they stated a nurse contacted the former DON regarding Registered Nurse (RN) / Wound Care Nurse #1 taking medications out of the medication cart. The Administrator and DON stated the nurse reported RN #1 told him the medications were discontinued, and she was going to give them to the DON. The Administrator and DON stated the nurse asked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call light were in working order for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed during random observation. If the facility is not ensuring a working call light system, then residents and staff are unable to request immediate assistance when needed. The findings are: A. On 01/02/25 at 9:50 am during observation, R #1 sat upright in bed and ate breakfast. R #1 mouthed the word help. Surveyor pressed the call light pinned to the side of R #1's bed. B. On 01/02/25 at 9:51 am during observation, the call light was pressed again, but there was not an audible sound or a light outside R #1's room above the door way. C. On 01/02/25 at 10:04 am during interview with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, he stated R #1 was unable to use his call light. He stated they considered getting the resident a pad (call light trigger), but did not do it yet. LPN #1 confirmed that he was unaware the call light for R #1 was not functional.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Director (AD) was a qualified professional who was a therapeutic recreation specialist. This failed practice had the potential to affect all the residents of the facility and not meet the interests of the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Program Design, revised 08/07/23 revealed, Policy: Centers/Communities must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each patient/resident (hereinafter patient), an ongoing program to support residents/patients in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each patient, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community. Recreation services will be designed to meet the individual's interests, abilities, and preferences through group and individual programs and independent leisure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff were taking meal temperatures to ensure they were served at safe temperatures before each meal was served. This had the potential for food borne illnesses and could affect all the residents of the facility who consume food from the kitchen. There were two residents in the sample that were nothing by mouth (NPO). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food: Preparation, revised 02/2023 revealed, All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) (or as state regulation requires) for hot holding, and less than 41 degrees F for cold food holding. Temperature for foods will be recorded at time of service, and monitored periodically during meal service periods. Review of the food temperature logs provided by the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed for the months of April, May, June, and July 2024 revealed April only had documented temperatures from 04/01/24 until 04/14/24. There were no documented meal temperatures for the months of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by not having the Medical Director attend the meetings. This had the potential for the Medical Directors responsibilities to provide care and direction to the facility and residents to go without direct oversite, and the potential to affect all the residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Center QAPI Process, revised 02/13/16 revealed, Policy: The Center is committed to incorporating the principles of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) into all aspects of the center work processes, service lines and departments. All staff and stakeholders are involved in QAPI to improve the quality of life and quality of care that our patients and residents experience. 2.2 Is composed of the following individuals: 2.2.7 CED, 2.2.2 Center Nurse Executive, 2.2.3 Medical Director. During an interview on 07/19/24 at 2:30 PM, the Medical Director was asked about an incident in which a progress note from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of maintenance audits, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and safe environment throughout the building. Broken/shattered windows and windows without screens were observed in a main hallway and in 18 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 111, 115, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 126, 128, 130, 132, 139, 143, 153, and 161). This failure created the potential for residents to be injured related to broken glass and created the potential for pests to enter the facility through windows without screens. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility's Preventative Maintenance Policy, most recently revised 01/08/24, read, in pertinent part, Each site will have a program in place that schedules preventative maintenance on equipment and the physical plant. Review of an email exchange between the MD and the facility's corporate office dated 04/02/24 was provided to the survey team and read, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure eight residents (Resident (R)86, R11, R33, R81, R209, R20, R44 and R70) of eight reviewed for oxygen administration out of a total sample of 46 residents received oxygen per nasal cannula according to the physician's order. They failed to ensure there was an order in place for a resident receiving oxygen. This failure had the potential for the resident to receive increased oxygen causing hyperoxia (cells, tissues and organs are exposed to an excess supply of oxygen.) Findings include: 1. Review of R86's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Pulmonary Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Acute Respiratory failure with Hypercapnia. Review of R86's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/07/24, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program within the facility. Flies were observed in multiple areas of the building during the survey. This failure created the potential for cross contamination related to the fly infestation. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: A request for the facility's policy related to pest control was requested by the survey team on 07/18/24, however one was not provided prior to survey exit on 07/19/24. During observations of Resident (R) 80 revealed two flies buzzing around the resident's head and food while she was eating her lunch on 07/15/24 at 1:44 PM, two flies buzzing around the resident's head and landing on her left leg and foot on 07/16/24 at 10:26 AM, one fly buzzing around the resident on 07/16/24 at 1:32 PM, and two flies buzzing around the in the hallway immediately outside of the resident's room on 07/16/24 at 4:15 PM. During an interview with R80 on 07/16/24 at 10:26 AM, the resident swiped at a fly buzzing around her head and stated, They (flies) are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident (R)81) out of a total sample of 46 residents observed was cared for in a dignified way by allowing his Foley catheter bag to be viewed from the doorway of his room. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident to be treated and cared for in an undignified manner. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Treatment: Considerate and Respectful, revised on 07/01/19, revealed, Policy: Centers will promote respectful and dignified care for patients in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life while recognizing each patient's individuality. Purpose: To provide patients the rights to a quality of life that supports independent expression, decision making, and respect. 1.9 Demeaning practices: Staff will refrain from practices that are demeaning to patients such as: 1.0.1 Keeping urinary catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not being left at the bedside for one of two residents (Resident (R)78) observed who was not assessed to self-administer medications out of 46 sampled residents. This had the potential for the resident not to receive their ordered medications and create unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medications: Self-Administration, revised 03/01/22, revealed, Policy: Patients who request to self-administer medications will be evaluated for safe and clinically appropriate capability based on the patient's functionality and health condition. If it is determined that the patient is able to self-administer, A physician/advanced practice provider (APP) order is required. Self-administration and medication self-storage must be care planned. When applicable, patient must be provided with a secure, locked area to maintain medications. Patients must be instructed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Code Status was correct throughout the electronic medical record (EMR) for one (Resident (R) R209) out of four residents reviewed for Advance Directives/Code Status. Physician's orders in the EMR indicated the resident's code status as Full Code rather than his preferred Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) in the event the resident was found not breathing and/or without a pulse. This failure created the potential for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to be performed on the resident when it was not desired. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Code Status Orders Policy dated [DATE] read, in pertinent part, Patient identification mechanisms and information about each patient's code status (Full Code vs. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) will be easily accessible to the clinical staff for all patients; and Upon admission/re-admission, a code status order is required as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have written documentation of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services]-10055 and the Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 for two of three for two of three residents (Resident (R)40 and R86) out of a sample of 46 residents. This had the potential for the residents to be unable to make an informed decision and to be unaware of additional costs and services when skilled services are ending and their right to appeal decisions. Findings include: Review of an undated list of Beneficiary Notice- Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months, document provided by the Administrator, listed residents who were discharged from Medicare covered Part A services with benefit days remaining who either were discharged home or chose to remain in the facility. On the list R40 and R86 were marked as Remaining in the facility. 1. Review of an undated document titled SNF Beneficiary Notification Review for R40,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two out of three sampled residents out of a total sample of 46 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident (R)19, and R81) and/or their representatives were provided with written transfer notices upon emergent transfer to the hospital. Also, notification was not provided to the ombudsman. This deficient practice could allow a resident to be transferred without knowing their rights. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Discharge and Transfer, revised on 11/14/22 revealed, Policy. For patients transferred to the hospital: 5.1 For unplanned acute transfers for the patient must be permitted to return to the Center. Prior to the transfer, the patent and the patient representative will be notified verbally followed by written notification using the Notice of Hospital or state specific transfer form. 5.2.1 Written notice must also be provided to the Ombudsman. 1. Review of R19's significant change Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident (R) 19 and R81) and/or their representatives out of a sample of 46 residents reviewed for hospitalization were given a written copy of a bed hold notice prior to or within 24-hours of transfer to the hospital. This failure creates the potential for residents and responsible parties not to have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice-Deliver Upon Transfer, revised August 2022, revealed, Process. Prior to a resident's transfer out of the center to a hospital for therapeutic leave, the staff member conducting the transfer out will provide both the resident and representative, if applicable, with the Bed Hold Policy Notice & Authorization form. Notice must be given regardless of payer. Resident copy is given directly to the resident prior to transfer and noted in the medical record.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was completed accurately for two residents (Resident (R)16 and R46) out of two residents reviewed for PASARR screenings out of a total sample of 46 residents. This had the potential for the residents to prevent or delay additional services to the residents that should have had a Level II PASARR completed. Findings include: 1. Review of R16's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, pseudobulbar affect, and psychosis. All of these diagnoses were present upon admission to the facility. Review of R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R) R18 and R80 of four residents reviewed for activities were provided with an appropriate ongoing program of activities to meet their needs. This failure created the potential for both residents to experience social isolation related to the lack of activity involvement. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Recreation Services Policy and Procedure, dated most recently revised on 08/07/23, read, in pertinent part, Center/Communities must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each patient/resident (hereinafter patient), an ongoing program to support residents/patients in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of an support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R) 80 of one resident reviewed for vision services had glasses available to her per her plan of care. This failure created the potential for the resident to experience negative effects related to not being able to see adequately. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: The facility's policy related to the provision of ancillary services, including vision services, was requested by the survey team on 07/18/24. The policy was not provided to the survey team prior to exit on 07/19/24. Review of R80's admission Record dated 07/19/24 and found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Admissions tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a stroke. Review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference (ARD) date of 04/06/24 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab indicated a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 80) of one resident reviewed for side rail use had appropriate physicians orders, provided informed consent form, and was appropriately assessed for her use of side rails. This had the potential for possible injury to the resident. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Rails Policy dated most recently revised on 09/01/22 read, in pertinent part, Centers will only use bed rails as mobility enablers .The Bed Rail Evaluation will be completed upon admission, re-admission, quarterly, change in bed or mattress, and with a significant change in condition. Prior to use/installation of a bed rail, staff will attempt the use of appropriate alternatives. If the alternatives were not adequate to meet the patient's needs, the patient will be evaluated for the use of bed rails; and After appropriate alternatives have been attempted and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Two errors were made with a total of 25 opportunities for error, resulting in an 8.0% error rate. The errors involved one (Resident (R) 58) of four residents observed during medication administration. This had the potential for R58 to experience negative effects related to errors with their medication administration. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Errors dated most recently revised on 07/01/24 read, Medication Error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medication or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professional providing services. Types of errors include; medication omission; wrong patient, dose,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained in regard to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for two of six sampled residents (Resident (R)212 and R208) who had indwelling urinary catheters out of sample of 46 residents. The facility further failed to ensure infection control was maintained related to catheters being observed on the floor for R208 and R212, and lastly the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment when not in use for R33 and R86. This had the potential for all the residents to acquire infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Procedure: Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 05/01/24, revealed, 1. Post the appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) sign on the patient's room door. 1.1 Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are to be utilized for the duration of the patient's stay. 1.1.1 Gown and gloves would not be required for patient care activities other than those listed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel records, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure three employees (Activities Assistant (AA), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 22 and CNA 23) of 31 staff members reviewed for the completion of required training were trained related to the facility's abuse processes and procedures prior to working in direct contact with residents. This failure created the potential for residents to be abused and/or for facility policies and procedures to not be followed in the event of potential abuse. A total of 46 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures most recently dated revised on 10/24/22 read, in pertinent part, Purpose: To ensure the Center staff are doing all that is within their control to prevent occurrences of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of property for all patients; and Training and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inquire about residents' dietary preferences for 6 (R#'s: 15, 18, 26, 27, 28, and 29) of 13 (R #'s: 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29) residents reviewed for food preferences. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling frustrated and possible weight loss due to a lack of dietary options. The findings are: A. Record review of NM consumer complaint number 71279 revealed R #15 had not been eating. R #15 did not like the food at the facility, and staff did not ask her if she had any preferences on what to eat. B. Record review of R #15's Electronic Helath Record (EHR) revealed she was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and then discharged from the facility on 12/22/23. C. On 03/07/24 at 11:13 am during an interview with R #18, she stated, I have colitis so I can't eat 75 percent (%) of the food that they serve. I can't eat tomato sauce or spicy food. I can't eat green chili. I don't like fish. I still sometimes get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment for all of the 110 residents identified by the facility census provided by the Administrator In Training (AIT) on 03/04/24, when staff failed to: 1. Ensure the facility did not smell like urine; 2. Ensure resident rooms were free of trash, floors are clean with no spots of dried liquids, and privacy curtains were clean and not soiled; 3. Replace a shattered window on the northwest hall; 4. Ensure hallways were clear of clutter. This deficient practice is likely to cause all residents to be exposed to environmental hazards and to not feel comfortable in their environment. The findings are: Urine Smell A. On 03/04/24 at 1:00 pm during an observation, as you walk into the building there was a smell of urine. On the north side of the building, there was a stronger smell of urine than on the south side of the building. There was not one room that the urine smell centered around. B. On 03/05/24 at 8:15 am, a walk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated a resident with respect and dignity for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident when staff left a resident lying in bed naked after receiving care. This deficient practice could result in residents feeling frustrated and devalued. The findings are: A. On 03/04/24 at 1:30 pm during an observation, R #3 lay in bed with a sheet partially over her body, but her breasts were visible. B. On 03/04/24 at 1:30 pm during an interview with R #3, she stated she wanted a gown and waited for one since yesterday. C. On 03/05/24 at 3:40 pm during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, she stated she changed R #3 at some point on 03/05/24 and forgot to get her a gown. CNA #1 stated she was not sure how long R #3 went without a gown, but it was a while.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an incident for 1 (R #17) of 3 (R #21, R #22, and R #23) residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice could likely result in the State Survey Agency not being aware of facility incidents and unable to assure residents have a safe and hazard free environment. The findings are: A. Record review of New Mexico consumer complaint number 71790, revealed staff transported R #17 to an outside appointment. The resident was strapped into wheelchair, but the wheelchair was not secured in van. The resident fell over and hit her head. The resident sustained three bumps to head and bruising to chest. B. Record review of R #17's nursing notes, dated 01/02/24, revealed the facility's van driver reported to the nurse that the resident fell backward and hit her head on the floor in the van during transportation. The resident complained of pain and discomfort to the back of her head. Staff administered tylenol and noticed bumps on the back of the resident's head. Provider and family member notified. Transferred the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left on a beside table in a resident's room for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident. This failure could likely result in resident injury if staff do not confirm residents take their medications. The findings are: A. On 03/04/24 at 1:15 pm during an observation, two pills sat on the bedside table. One was pinkish and maroon in color. The other pill was white, oval, and slightly dissolved. B. On 03/04/24 at 1:15 pm, during an interview with R #3, she stated she was unaware of what the pills were or where they came from. C. On 03/04/24 at 1:30 pm during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, he stated he did not see the pills on the resident's bedside table this morning (03/04/24) when he took R #3 her medications. He stated staff should not leave the pills sitting on the resident's beside table, and it was a problem. D. On 03/04/24 at 2:15 pm during an interview with RN #1, he stated he spoke with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 who worked with R #3 RN #1 stated the CNA told him she saw the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure staff properly stored medications in a locked container. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 110 residents identified on the facility census list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/04/24. Improperly stored medications could result in a resident, staff member or a visitor taking the medications. The findings are: Medication in the Director of Nursing (DON) Office A. On 03/04/24 at 2:20 pm during an observation, a large trashcan was full of medications, did not have a lid, and sat in the DON's office. The DON was not in her office, and her office door was open. B. On 03/04/24 at 3:12 pm during an interview with the DON, she stated she did not know if the medications needed to be locked up or not. She stated the narcotics were locked up, and she pointed to a locked container mounted on the wall. She stated the medications in the trashcan needed to be logged and destroyed. C. On 03/04/24 at 3:50 pm during an interview with the DON, she stated she spoke with her pharmacist. She said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu, and honor resident preferences. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 104 residents listed on the census presented by the Administrator on 11/06/23 and could likely result in reduced food intake, weight loss, and a decline in a resident's psychosocial health (the health of someone's emotions, behaviors, and social abilities) due to developing feelings of frustration and/or unsatisfaction with meal options, anxiety (an excess feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and disappointment. The findings are: A. On 11/06/23 at 10:10 am, during an initial tour and observation of the facility, the following observations were made: -Week 3 Week-At-A-Glance Menu was posted in the Skilled Care unit hallway, and in the Long-Term Care hallway of the facility. No other signage regarding menu options was posted. -Week 3 Week-At-A-Glance Menu was posted outside the main dining area. A daily menu for Thursday breakfast, lunch, and dinner was posted. The current day of the week was Monday.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at an appetizing temperature, were attractive, and palatable (pleasant to taste). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 104 residents identified on the census provided by the Administrator on 11/06/23 and could likely reduce residents' ability to eat and enjoy meals, decrease their quality of life, and cause weight loss due to feelings of frustration, anxiety (an excess feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and disappointment. The findings are: A. On 11/03/23 at 2:50 pm, during an interview, Power of Attorney (POA-a person who has the authority to make legal or financial decisions for a person they represent) #1 for R #2, stated R #2's food was always cold and the food was not the right kind of food for a diabetic. B. On 11/06/23 at 10:23 am, during an interview, R #12 stated the food was awful quality. It was not cooked appropriately, meat would be dried out and not tender. The food was not really warm, not hot, and it does not look good. He stated a cucumber…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide follow up reports within five (5) working days from the date of the incidents to the State Survey Agency, for 2 (R #9 and R #10) of 5 (R #6, R #7, R #8, R #9, and R #10) residents reviewed for incidents. If the facility fails to provide a five (5) day follow-up report to the State Agency then the State Agency will be unable to assure residents are safe and have a hazard free environment. The findings are: A. Record review of New Mexico Health Facility Licensing and Certification (NMHFL&C) report revealed a Facility Initiated Report (FIR), received 08/18/2023, regarding alleged abuse of R #9. The record did not contain a five (5)-day follow up report received regarding this incident. B. Record review of New Mexico Health Facility Licensing and Certification (NMHFL&C) report revealed a Facility Initiated Report (FIR), received 09/26/2023, regarding alleged neglect of R #10. The record did not contain a five (5)- day follow up report received regarding this incident. C. On 11/07/23 at 1:21 pm, during interview,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT(consists of a team of professionals of various roles within the facility who review and determine resident needs and abilities)) determine if residents could self-administer medication for 1 (R #1) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3 and R #4) residents reviewed. If the facility is not assessing the residents to determine if a resident is capable of self-administering medications, then this deficient practice is likely to result in residents self-administering medications inappropriately and or incorrectly, likely causing harm (overdose, missed medications, and another resident taking the medication.) The findings are: Findings for R #1 A. On 10/06/23 at 2:15 pm, during an interview, R #1 revealed she had an inhaler at bedside. R #1 stated the night nurse from the night before had brought the inhaler in and tossed it to her. He never came back to retrieve it. B. On 10/06/23 at 2:17 pm, during an observation of R #1 medication revealed an inhaler, Proair (albuterol used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively manage pain for 1 (R #2) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3, and R #4) residents reviewed for pain by not providing pain treatment. This deficient practice could likely result in residents experiencing a significant (long) period of pain without sufficient relief for pain. The findings are: A. Record review of facility's Policy for Pain management, revised 11/01/23, revealed, Policy: Staff will continually observe and monitor patients for comfort and presence of pain and will implement strategies in accordance with standards with professional standards of practice, the patient -centered plan of care, and the patient's choices related to pain management. Purpose: To maintain possible level of comfort for the patients by providing a system to identify, assess, treat, and evaluate pain. B. Record review of R #2 admission record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] his diagnosis includes, but are not limited to the following: Acquired absence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure that all residents that have a personal funds account with the facility are able to access their funds on weekends/evenings. This deficient practice is likely to affect all residents having an account with the facility. If residents are unable to access their funds when desired, then residents are likely to not be able to participate in activities and purchase food or personal items when they choose. The findings are: A. On 08/17/23 at 10:32 a.m., during an interview, the Business Manager (BM) stated currently, residents are unable to access their personal funds during evening or weekend hours. She stated after COVID (a viral infection that resulted in a pandemic) started the facility stopped providing this service and has not re-started this service since. The BM stated that she could and would reinstate the availability of after hours and weekend access to personal funds today.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain consistent meal service times for residents and serve snacks between meals. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 113 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Center Executive Director on 08/13/23. This deficient practice could likely result in residents becoming frustrated and/or residents not receiving meals if meals are not served at consistent meal times, and could affect the physical and mental health of residents. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 12:29 pm during a random observation, revealed posted at the entrance of the dining room was a sign with the following information: Meal Times: Breakfast - 7:30 am, Lunch - 12:30 pm, and Dinner - 5:30 pm. B. On 08/13/23 at 12:32 pm, a random observation of the lunch meal service revealed several residents sat in the dining room and waited for lunch to be served. R #37 appeared to be falling asleep at her table. At 12:44 pm, staff served beverages to residents. One staff member asked R #37 if she was tired and wanted to go to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the facility refrigerators was properly labeled, dated, and/or disposed of based on the use by date. This deficient practice could likely affect the 109 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 08/13/23 that receive food or meals from the kitchen and could likely lead to foodborne illnesses (an infection or irritation of the gastrointestinal tract - a pathway by which food enters the body and solid wastes are expelled - caused by food or beverages that contain harmful bacteria) amongst residents, if safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Refrigerated/Frozen Storage, dated 05/01/23, revealed: - 1.4 All foods are labeled with the name of the product and the date received and use by date once opened. Manufacturer 'use by' dates are used until opened. - 1.5 Prepared foods are labeled and dated with the name of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide proper infection control practices when staff failed to ensure glucometers (a medical device to measure glucose {sugar} levels in the blood). utilized by the facility for more than one resident, were disinfected per manufacturer's instructions after each time one is used, for 4 (R #260, R #103, R #157, R #48) of 4 (R #260, R #103, R #157, R #48) residents that receive capillary (small blood vessels) blood glucose (CBG, capillary blood glucose) monitoring with glucometers. The facility also failed to ensure staff conducted proper hand hygiene between residents while serving meals to residents. These deficient practices may likely result in the spread of infection agents (viruses and bacteria) between residents and or staff who utilize glucometers, between residents and staff during meals, and if staff are not using proper hand hygiene procedures after touching residents or surfaces before serving meals. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 12:28 PM, an observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff maintain the right for residents to preserve personal items for 1 (R #71) of 1 (R #71) resident reviewed for personal items. This deficient practice is likely to cause the resident to feel isolated and unable to join activities that they enjoy, because they do not have their prescription glasses. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 3:51 PM, during an interview, R #71 stated he verbally reported he was missing some of his clothing and his glasses several times to nursing staff since his admission on [DATE]. R #71 stated, since 08/13/23, he has received a small box of clothing from the other facility, but his prescription glasses are still missing. He said he cannot see well without his glasses and feels frustrated with the facility. R#71 stated he cannot enjoy any activities and has been getting headaches. B. On 08/15/23 at 2:28 PM, during an interview with Social Services (SS #2), SS#2 tried to contact R #71's previous facility to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a MDS (Minimum Data Set- a collection of health data that reflects a resident's functional capabilities) assessment for 2 (R #19 and 94) of 4 (R #'s 6, 19, 70, and 94) residents reviewed for resident assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility receiving monies they are not entitled to and resident needs not being identified and/or treated, resulting in residents receiving less than optimal care. The findings are: Findings for R #94 A. Record review of R #94's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed that R #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from the facility on 03/23/23. B. Record review of R #94's MDS assessment, dated 03/23/23, revealed that the discharge assessment was in progress. C. On 08/16/23 at 12:37 pm, during an interview, the MDS nurse said staff realized during a recent audit R #94's discharge assessment was missing, and they are now in the process of completing it. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications for 1 (R #66) of 2 (R #'s 23 and 66) residents reviewed for medication regimen. This deficient practice could likely result in a resident not feeling well due to the lack of treatment. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 2:52 pm, during an interview, R #66 reported that there have been a few times when his mediation was not given to him. B. Record review of R #66's face sheet revealed that R #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Nondisplaced fracture ( the bone cracks or breaks but retains its proper alignment) of right radial styloid process (Radial Styloid Process- the end of the radius, the thicker and shorter of the two long bones in the forearm, that meets the bones of the hand), abrasion of right ear, depression, and rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor (an immune system protein that attacks healthy cells in the body). C. Record review of physician orders revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance with showering for 1 (R #157) of 1 (R #157) resident reviewed. These deficient practices have the potential to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are A. Record review of R #157 face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include: - Idiopathic (unknown cause); - Aseptic (not caused by viral/bacterial infection); - Necrosis (dead/dying cells) of unspecified toes; - Morbid obesity (severely overweight) due to excess calories; - Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). B. Record review of R #157 Multiple Data Survey (MDS; a series interviews and assessments to determine a residents needs and abilities), Section C (a section of the MDS that indicates a persons ability to remember and recall, indicating a resident's level of dementia), revealed a BIMS score (Brief Interview of Mental Status; score range between 0 and 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to store medications in their proper container in a medication cart. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 12:56 PM, during observation of the front hall medication cart, two round yellow tablets, one green oval tablet, one blue oval tablet, and one green circular tablet were found loose under the medication cards. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed the medication was loose under the medication cards. B. On 08/13/23 at 1:10 PM, during observation of the south east hall medication cart, four round white tablets, one large round orange tablet, one blue round tablet, and one white oval tablet were found loose under the medication cards. LPN #2 confirmed the medication was loose under the medication cards. C. On 08/13/23 at 1:15 PM, during an interview, LPN #2 stated loose medications, when found in the medication cart, should be destroyed and not left in the carts.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #48) of 1 (R #48) resident was treated in a respectful manner that preserved the residents' dignity. This deficient practice has the potential to reduce residents' quality of life, through feelings of frustration, humiliation, and anxiety. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for multiple diagnoses including: hemiplegia (one sided paralysis of the body and/or face), hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness), cerebral infarction (stroke, ruptured and bleeding blood vessel of the brain) affecting the left side; acquired absence of left leg below the knee (amputation of left leg, below the knee). B. Record review of R #48's physician orders revealed an order, dated 08/11/23, to ensure CNAs (certified nurses aide) turn and reposition for pressure relief. C. On 08/13/23 the following observations were made: - At 1:00 p.m., R #48 was observed in his room lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of missed medication administrations for 1 (R #66) of 2 (R #'s 23 and 66) residents reviewed for medication regimen. This deficient practice could likely result in a stalled improvement in condition due to the lack of medication and/or not receiving an alternative treatment. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 2:52 pm, during an interview, R #66 reported there have been a few times where his mediation was not given to him. B. Record review of R #66's face sheet revealed R #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Nondisplaced fracture of right radial styloid process, abrasion of right ear, depression, and rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor. C. Record review of physician orders revealed the following pertinent medication orders: - Physician order dated, 07/01/23-07/03/23: Ciprofloxacin HCl [type of antibiotic] Ophthalmic Ointment .3% instill 5 drops in right eye two times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that grievances (complaints over something believed to be wrong or unfair) filed by residents were tracked, followed up on, and resolved to the satisfaction of the resident for 1 (R #50) of 1 (R#50) resident reviewed for grievances. This deficient practice could likely result in continued issues or concerns not being addressed appropriately or in a timely manner by staff and residents feeling as though their concerns are not important to the staff. A. Record review of R #50's face sheet revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 08/13/23 at 4:28 pm, during an interview, R #50 stated about a month ago (mid July 2023) he filed a grievance with Social Services (SS) #2 about his call light not being answered timely, and he never heard back from anyone about the status of the grievance. R #50 stated, We can fill out a grievance (form) and drop it (the grievance form) in the grievance box, but there is no follow up by the staff. We…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (R #48) of 1(R #48) residents. Failure to develop and implement a person-centered care plan may result in staff's failure to understand the needs and implement treatments for residents possibly resulting in decline in abilities and a failure to thrive. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for multiple diagnoses including: - Hemiplegia (one sided paralysis of the body and/or face), hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness); - Cerebral infarction (stroke, ruptured and bleeding blood vessel of the brain) affecting left side; - Acquired absence of left leg below knee (amputated left leg below the knee). B. Record review of R#48's medical record revealed the care plan was developed and initiated on 07/12/23, but the plan did not address the residents activities. C. On 08/16/23 at 9:31 am, during an interview, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary discharge planning services for 1 (R #41) of 1 (R #41) resident reviewed for discharge planning. This deficient practice resulted in the resident being discharged without adequate planning. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48 History and Physical, dated 06/09/23, revealed he was a patient of an outpatient medical service (OMS) who was admitted to the facility for respite care (a temporary placement of a patient into a controlled setting to allow family and home care givers a break from care. The document was signed by the physician of the outpatient medical service. B. Record review of R#48 face sheet revealed R #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: - End stage renal disease (progressive failure of the kidneys); - Dependence on renal dialysis (requirement to mechanically filter blood of toxic chemicals). C. Record review of R #48 daily care notes revealed: - 05/23/23 General: Pt.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide food in the texture as ordered by the physician for 1 (R #258) of 1 (258) residents reviewed for meal textures. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not eating or experiencing difficulty swallowing during meal times. The findings are: A. On 08/14/23 at 10:32 am, during an interview, R #258 explained her meals are not consistent. Sometimes she receives broths only and sometimes she receives pureed food. B. Record review of R #258's physician order, dated 08/03/23, revealed Full Liquid diet, Regular Texture. C. Record review of R #258's Speech Therapy evaluation, dated 07/20/23, revealed R #258 is experiencing GI (gastrointestinal- the organs in your body that aid in food digestion) issues. She is able to tolerate thin liquids and puree without signs of aspiration; however, she is waiting for clearance from her GI specialist for a diet texture change. Further review revealed the following recommendation: thin liquids and no solids by mouth. D. Record review of R #258's care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment [surgical/medical physician appointment] and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (R #28 and #281) of 7 (R #1, #28, #33, #78, #169, #281 and #282) residents who were reviewed for having transportation needs. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling frustrated with not receiving their scheduled treatments, including transportation to and from appointments. Residents could also have worsened medical conditions due to a delay in attending their scheduled surgical/medical physician appointments. The findings are: Findings related to R #28: A. Record review of R #28's admission Record dated 02/03/22, included the following diagnoses: metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain, caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease to function on a permanent basis), dependence on renal dialysis (a process of removing excess water, and toxins from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is a repeat deficiency from a survey that was conducted on 06/30/21. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #165) of 1 (R #165) resident noted to have cognitive [thinking] impairment with behavioral symptoms [persistent or repetitive behaviors that are disruptive {troublesome, uncontrolled} or inappropriate] received all necessary person centered interventions to maintain or improve her well-being while admitted into the facility by: 1. by failing to provide sufficient and consistent monitoring of behaviors by leaving her alone in a room with the door closed and 2. by failing to plan and implement interventions to address her behaviors noted. These deficient practices may likely have contributed to the resident's decline in health leading to her readmission to an acute care facility. The findings are: A. Record review of admission record revealed, R #165 was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of metabolic encepholopathy [disease that affects brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is a repeat deficiency from a survey that was completed on 12/16/20. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement (put into place) a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (R #31 and #78) of 5 (R #8, #31, #72, #77 and #78) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff's failure to understand and implement the needs and treatments of the residents. The findings are: Findings related to R #31: A. Record review of Face Sheet dated 02/05/22 for R #31 revealed this as an initial admission date and included the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body after a stroke) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) and metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration of brain function or consciousness due to failure of other internal organs). B. Record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R #31 revealed, Section G - Bathing - Activity did not occur; Section V - Care Area Assessment - ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that bathing/showering assistance was provided for 1 (R #31) of 3 (R #s 31, 49 and 72) residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living). This deficient practice could likely result in residents in need of this specialized care to experience a decline in their ability to perform hygiene tasks and/or maintain good personal hygiene. The findings are: A. Record review of Face Sheet dated 02/05/22 for R #31 revealed this as an initial admission date and included the following diagnoses: Recurrent Dislocation Left Shoulder (an injury in which your upper arm bone pops out of the cup-shaped socket that is part of your shoulder blade), Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), Metabolic Encephalopathy (abnormalities of the water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect brain function), Chronic Pain, Morbid (Severe) Obesity (Overweight),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This is a repeat deficiency from a survey that was completed on 12/16/20. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that opened/accessed multi-dose vials (a vial of liquid medication that contains more than one dose of the medication) of medications that had been accessed were dated; 2) Ensure that medical supplies were stored in an appropriate place, not under the sink; 3) Ensure that expired medical supplies were not stored with current medical supplies that were ready and available for use; and 4) Ensure that treatment/medication carts were kept locked when not in use. These deficient practices could likely affect all 108 identified residents listed on the facility's Resident Alphabetical Census list provided by the Center Executive Director (CED) on 04/11/22. The findings are: Findings related to multi-dose vials opened and undated, medical supplies being stored under the sink and expired medical supplies stored with active current medical supplies: A. On 04/26/22 at 9:27 am, during an observation of the Rapid Recovery Services (RRS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received pneumococcal (pneumonia an infection in one or both lungs) vaccines according to current vaccine recommendations with their consent for 1 (R #3 ) of 5 (R #s 3, 7, 11, 31 and 78) residents reviewed for immunizations. If residents are not vaccinated as appropriate against pneumonia they have a higher likelihood of contracting that illness and spreading it to other residents and staff in the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of facility policy titled, IC 601 Pneumococcal Vaccination - Prevnar 13 (PCV13) [a type of pneumococcal vaccine, protecting against 13 types of pneumonia causing bacteria] or Pneumovax (PPSV23) [a type of pneumococcal vaccine protecting against 23 types of pneumonia causing bacterial], last review date 09/02/20 revealed, provide the opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccine to all patients .In adherence with current recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and clean bathroom environment for 2 roommates (R #28 and #78) who share the restroom with an adjoining room. This deficient practice of not maintaining a clean bathroom, is likely to result in the two residents becoming very upset and embarrassed of this daily occurrence. The findings are: A. On 04/25/22 at 11:41 am, during an interview, R #78 discussed a situation that was occurring for herself and her roommate R #28. They reside in room [ROOM NUMBER]. R #78 stated that the resident in the next room, room [ROOM NUMBER] when she defecates (discharge feces from the body)in the bathroom on the toilet, there is fecal matter all over the bathroom. R #78 stated when she needs to use the restroom, she first has to clean up the mess that R #276 has made. R #78 stated that this has been occurring for quite awhile. She stated that between herself and her roommate R #28, they have expressed their frustrations and concerns to the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-03 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the most recent survey results and any plan of corrections available in a place that was readily accessible to residents, family members, legal representatives and visitors. This deficient practice likely affects all resident identified on the census list provided by the Administrator on 02/14/25. If residents are unable to locate the latest survey results conducted by State Surveyors then residents, representatives, and visitors are unable to know how the facility is doing and make placement decisions accordingly. The findings are: A. On 02/14/25 at 10:01 am during observation of the facility lobby and interview with the Administrator, the survey report binder was not observed. When asked where the survey report binder is kept, the Administrator stated that the binder was in his office so that he would be able to update it. The Administrator pulled a binder from his bookshelf that was labeled Survey 2021-2023. The Administrator confirmed that the survey report binder was not updated with the most recent surveys…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared and served to prevent cross contamination when kitchen aides were not wearing hairnets during the lunch meal services. This deficient practice could likely affect all residents identified on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 02/14/25. The findings are: A. On 02/15/25 at 12:12 pm, during lunch meal service, staff were standing in the doorway of the kitchen, waiting to be handed lunch meal trays to be passed out to residents sitting in the dining room. Upon observation, there was an unidentified staff member inside the kitchen and not wearing a hairnet. Near the kitchen entrance, there were no hairnets available. Surveyor requested a hairnet for the Dietary Manager (DM) and the DM went to the back of the kitchen and returned with a hairnet. B. On 02/15/25 at 12:16 pm during observation. Kitchen Aide (KA) #1, KA #2 and KA #3 and were observed preparing the lunch meal service in the facility kitchen by being handed plates with served food, and they placed food items and plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that is clean and sanitary. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the 113 residents listed on the facility census as provided by facility administrator on 08/13/23. If the facility fails to maintain resident rooms and common areas in a homelike environment, residents are likely to be exposed to environmental hazards which may result in unsafe conditions and exacerbate (make worse) health issues. The findings are: A. On 08/13/23 at 12:45 pm, during a random observation in the main dining room, revealed the dining room floor had dried spill spots (some are red in color and some are clear), and the floor was sticky throughout the dining room. There were pieces of scrambled eggs, bacon, scraps/crumbs, and fruit pieces on the floor under resident tables where the residents waited for their lunch meal. There were three meal carts parked in the dining room. The first cart had an unserved meal tray in it, and the cart had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$294,513 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $106,750 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
- $149,042 — penalty dated 2025-04-03
- $38,721 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEAK MEDICAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| NOYA, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/06/2025 |
| WOODS, BRYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/06/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325036. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.