Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ce
1008 Thompson Street, Jersey Shore, PA 17740 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (570) 398-4747 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0604), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $46,196 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.7% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.3% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.2% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.6% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.3% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.40 | 1.18 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.7%CMS range 40.6–60.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.9–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 87.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.3–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse regarding the use of a physical restraint not required to treat a resident's medical symptoms for one of one resident reviewed for restraints resulting in actual harm (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the policy entitled Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed on September 27, 2024, indicates that the facility prohibits abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/patient property, and exploitation for all patients. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the patient's medical symptoms. Anyone who witnesses an incident of suspected abuse is to report the incident to his or her supervisor immediately. Review of the policy entitled Use of Restraints, last reviewed on September 27, 2024, indicates the patients have the right to be free from any physician or chemical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely identify and treat a pressure ulcer for one of two residents reviewed, which resulted in actual harm (Residents CR1). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after a hospital stay with a list of complex medical diagnosis that included a new right leg below knee amputation, and surgery for repair of a left hip fracture. An admission evaluation started September 1, 2023, and completed September 2, 2023, revealed facility staff assessed Resident CR1 as having multiple skin alterations in addition to the left hip and right leg surgical site due to the procedures noted above, including a deep tissue injury to the resident's left heel with a protective boot in place. A skin and wound evaluation dated September 2, 2023, noted the area on Resident CR1's left heel to be a deep tissue injury measuring 2.9 centimeters (cm) in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for one of two residents reviewed (Residents CR1).Findings include:Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after an extensive hospital stay since [DATE], in stable condition but with a significantly poor prognosis noted by the physician. The resident was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident CR1's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered the following: Morphine Sulfate (an opioid pain medication used to treat severe pain) oral solution 20mg (milligrams)/5 ml (milliliters) on [DATE], to be administered 0.25 ml every one hour as needed for moderate pain, severe pain, or air hunger (not being able to get enough air, rapid shallow breathing) until her discharge. Fluoxetine HCL (an antidepressant medication) 40 mg one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include:Observation of facility's main kitchen on March 24, 2026, at 10:17 AM revealed the following: Water pooled on the floor in the corners under the dish machine area with various items of debris, including papers, straws, plastic lids and pieces of food. A large bulletin board extending across the wall behind the coffee brewing station was observed with significant visible dust along the top frame edge of the board. The lower shelf of a storage shelving unit containing pans located behind the steam table area was significantly dusty, sticky to touch, and contained dried food debris. Two large clear plastic storage bins located on the lower shelf of a food preparation table next to the food serving line were observed with one labeled sugar and one labeled flour. The exterior of both containers contained dried spills and dried food debris. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were addressed timely for three of 23 residents interviewed (Residents 13, 2, and 109).Findings include: Interview with Resident 13 on March 24, 2026, at 10:30 AM revealed she frequently must wait 30 to 40 minutes for staff to answer her call bell. Interview with Resident 2 on March 24, 2026, at 9:37 AM revealed that it can take staff 30-45 minutes for staff to answer his call bell. He stated that he was told this morning not to ring his call bell so much since Department of Health was in the building. Interview with Resident 109 on March 24, 2026, at 2:27 PM revealed she can wait an hour for her call bell to be answered, mostly on second and third shifts. Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes dated February 6, 2026, revealed the residents indicated that call bells are not being answered timely on third shift. Observation of staff response to call bells revealed Resident 13 activated her call bell on March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor psychotropic medication use to ensure residents' medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary psychotropic medications for three of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Residents 6, 79, and 12). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Behaviors: Management of Symptoms, last reviewed without changes on January 28, 2026, revealed that non-pharmacological intervention refers to approaches to care that do not involve medications, generally directed toward stabilizing and/or improving a resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Staff will use non-pharmacological interventions as the first line of approach to managing challenging behaviors. Behaviors and interventions will be addressed in the care plan. The purpose of the policy included that the facility would monitor outcomes of care plan interventions and minimize the use of psychotropic medications, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility bed-hold policy to residents' responsible parties at the time of transfer and failed to ensure that the written notice of transfer included all the required contents for three of three residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Residents 8, 3, and 12). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed profile information that indicated that she had a resident representative (identified as her significant other). Nursing documentation dated January 3, 2026, at 12:36 PM revealed that Resident 8 had complained of hallucinations, burning with urination, and not feeling well. Staff notified Resident 8's physician who instructed staff to send Resident 8 to the emergency room for evaluation. Nursing documentation dated January 3, 2026, at 5:31 PM revealed that the emergency room reported that Resident 8 was admitted to the hospital's critical care unit (CCU).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with activities of daily living assistance for five of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 1, 119, 120, and 121).Findings include: During an interview with Resident 2 on March 24, 2026, at 9:39 AM he stated that recently the staff will only give him a bed bath. Resident 2 stated that he would prefer a shower and have his hair washed. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 2 on December 30, 2025. Review of Resident 2's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated January 6, 2026, noted staff assessed Resident 2 as dependent on staff for bathing. Review of Resident 2's Kardex (documentation system used by staff to organize and reference key resident information essential for resident care) revealed he is to receive a bath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed pharmacy recommendations for four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 3, 5, 6, and 12). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, last reviewed without changes on January 28, 2026, indicated that the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review (DRR) is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen and medical chart of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and ensure that the medications each resident receives are clinically indicated. In accordance with state regulations, the consultant pharmacist works with the nursing care center nursing staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure and store resident medications and treatments on two of three nursing units (Second and Third Floor Nursing Unit; Residents 2, 5, 13 and 73). Findings include: Observation on the third-floor nursing unit on March 24, 2026, at 10:49 AM revealed the E Hall medication cart was unlocked in the hallway, immediately visible when entering the unit from the stairwell. The computer was noted to have resident information visible on the screen for Resident 73, including the resident's birthday, room number, and medication list. In addition, an insulin pen with Resident 73's name was located on top of the cart. Employee 1, licensed practical nurse, returned to the cart at 10:51 AM and indicated he had been called away to assist with another resident. Observation on the third-floor nursing unit on March 25, 2026, at 10:43 AM, revealed the D Hall medication cart was unlocked in the hallway outside Resident 5's room, with the computer unlocked and Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of employee personnel and education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each nurse aide received 12 hours of in-service training annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 3, 4, and 5).Findings include: Review of Employee 3's (nurse aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on December 10, 2022. Review of training records provided by the facility for Employee 3 dated December 10, 2024, to December 10, 2025, revealed that Employee 3 completed only nine hours and 47 minutes of in-service education. Review of Employee 4's (nurse aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on December 10, 2022. Review of training records provided by the facility for Employee 4 dated December 10, 2024, to December 10, 2025, revealed that Employee 4 completed only seven hours and 37 minutes of in-service education. Review of Employee 5's (nurse aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on July 5, 2023. Review of training records provided by the facility for Employee 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that active physician orders incorporated resident wishes related to end-of-life care for two of three residents reviewed for advanced directives concerns (Residents 79 and 81). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Health Care Decision Making, last reviewed without changes on [DATE], revealed that it is the right of all residents to participate in their own health care decision-making, including the right to decide whether they wish to request, accept, refuse, or discontinue treatment, and to formulate or not formulate an advance directive. The facility must approach a capable resident who does not have an advance directive upon admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition to discuss whether they wish to consider developing an advance directive. Inquire with the resident's patient representative if the resident is incapacitated. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and odor free environment on two of three nursing units (First and Second Floor Nursing Units, Residents 13, 31, and 92). Findings include: Observation of Resident 13's room on March 24, 2026, at 10:46 AM revealed Resident 13 was seated on the side of her bed. The bed sheets were visibly soiled with a large yellow and light brown stain. There was a strong urine odor in the room and adjacent hallway. A subsequent observation at 12:24 PM revealed Resident 13's sheets were changed but the urine odor remained. Observation of Resident 13's room on March 25, 2026, at 10:02 AM revealed Resident 13 was seated on the side of her bed. The bed sheets were visibly soiled with a large dark yellow stain. A subsequent observation at 11:41 AM revealed Resident 13 was standing beside her bed, changing her soiled bed sheets. There was a strong urine odor in the room and adjacent hallway. The above concerns for Resident 13 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for resisting care one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 82). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 82 on May 1, 2025. Nursing documentation dated January 22, 2026, at 3:47 AM revealed there was a strong smell of ammonia emanating from the room, out into the hallway. Resident 82's entire bed was visibly wet from urine. Resident appeared not to have been changed for several hours with saturated brief and bed linens. Licensed practical nurse noted Resident 82's sacrum was red from her incontinence of bowel and bladder. Nursing documentation dated January 23, 2026, at 2:00 AM revealed the nurse was called to assist the nurse aides with care. Resident 82 was observed hitting and threatening staff. The nurse explained to Resident 82 that her bed and brief was soiled, and Resident 82 continued yelling at staff. The licensed practical nurse notified the registered nurse supervisor of Resident 82's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement care and services to maintain activities of daily living (ambulation) for one of three residents reviewed for declines in activities of daily living (Resident 6). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 6 revealed an active physician order dated March 16, 2025, that instructed that Resident 6 was to transfer with the assistance of one staff, then was to walk with a front-wheeled walker from her room to the E hallway window with chair to follow behind. An annual MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated May 8, 2025, indicated Resident 6 required partial to moderate assistance of staff to walk 10 feet and to transfer to and from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair). A physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], included the instructions for a restorative nursing program (RNP) that included range-of-motion treatment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for supplemental oxygen use for one of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration concerns (Resident 16).Findings include: Observation of Resident 16 on March 24, 2026, at 2:12 PM revealed him to have supplemental oxygen in use via a room concentrator (machine that draws in room air and condenses the oxygen saturation of the room air to administer supplemental oxygen to a resident at 90 percent or higher through a mask or nasal cannula (NC, flexible tubing with prongs at one end that insert into the nares) set at four liters per minute (4 l/m). Clinical record review for Resident 16 revealed an active physician order dated February 20, 2026, for staff to administer supplemental oxygen as needed (PRN) at two liters per minute (2 l/m) via nasal cannula (NC) when short of breath (SOB) for comfort. Observation of Resident 16 with Employee 1 (licensed practical nurse) on March 27, 2026, at 8:38 AM confirmed that Resident 16 continued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee personnel record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance evaluation of each nurse aide at least once every 12 months for one of one nurse aides reviewed (Employee 5).Findings include: Review of Employee 5's (nurse aide) personnel file revealed a hire date of July 5, 2023. There was no evidence the facility completed an annual performance evaluation for Employee 5 at least once every 12 months. Upon request to facility administration the facility could not provide any completed performance evaluations for Employee 5. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on March 27, 2026, at 11:45 AM confirmed that a performance evaluation was not completed annually for Employee 5. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 (2) Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental care for one of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 13).Findings include: Interview and observation of Resident 13 on March 24, 2026, at 10:53 AM revealed Resident 13 had several broken and missing teeth. Resident 13 could not recall the last time she had seen a dentist. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 13 on January 15, 2019, the State Medicaid plan was her primary payer source. Further review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed a dental progress note dated October 2, 2024, indicating Resident 13 was not seen on this date due to refusing dental services. Review of Resident 13 care plan-initiated January 15, 2019, revealed Resident 13 is at risk for dental or oral cavity health problems related to abnormal mouth tissue, natural broken teeth with obvious cavities. An intervention added on this date revealed the facility would refer Resident 13 to a dentist for evaluation or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide recommended pneumococcal immunizations for two of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 6 and 9).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 9 on April 16, 2024. Documentation in Resident 9's clinical record revealed he received two pneumococcal vaccines prior to his admission (PCV13 and Pneumovax Dose 1). Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed no evidence that the facility obtained a consent from Resident 9 or his responsible party to administer the updated pneumococcal vaccine. According to the CDC guidance entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults dated October 2024, Resident 9's pneumococcal vaccinations would not be completed until he received a PCV20 or PCV21 at least one year after PCV13. There was no documented evidence to indicate that the facility offered Resident 9 an updated pneumococcal vaccination. Clinical record review revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician ordered treatment for wounds for four of five residents reviewed (Residents CR1, 1, 2, and 4). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a physician's order dated July 26, 2025, for the resident to have treatment to a Stage 3 (full thickness skin loss that extends to the fat layer) of the right heel daily cleansing with a normal saline solution (NSS), pat dry, apply skin prep to the wound and leave open to air. There was no evidence this treatment was completed on September 11, and 17, 2025. Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed a physician's order dated August 25, 2025, for the resident to have a left lateral foot wound cleaned with NSS and have a betadine (antiseptic) soaked cover, pads, and gauze applied and covered with a bandage wrap every three days. The resident also had an order dated August 25, 2025, to receive treatment to venous ulcers (due to poor circulation) on his right foot first toe, left foot third toe, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely medications to one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3) and failed to obtain and provide medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: Review of the facility's current policy entitled Medication Administration General Guidelines, revealed it is the facility's policy that medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled times, except before or after meal orders, which are administered based on mealtimes. In an interview with Resident 3 on October 1, 2025, at 3:14 PM the resident indicated she sometimes needs to tell staff she needs her medications because they are late. Resident 3 stated she used to get her morning medication closer to 8:00 AM but it has been closer to 10:30 AM at times, and that she believes her medication times were going to change because staff were working on two floors. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier precautions for three of four residents reviewed for infection control concerns (Residents 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: Review of the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) memo entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, gown and glove use) in Nursing Homes to Prevent the Spread of Multi-drug Resistant Organisms, released by CMS on March 20, 2024, with an implementation date of April 1, 2024, revealed that nursing care facilities are to use EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices (e.g., indwelling urinary catheters) during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. High-contact activity would include things like dressing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, wound care, or device care. Review of the facility's current policy entitled Enhanced Barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care for dependent residents for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 5 and 7).Findings include: Interview with Resident 5 on August 14, 2025, at 10:21 AM revealed that no staff provided morning care assistance (e.g., bathing, hygiene, or incontinence care) on this date. Resident 5 stated, they (staff) have done nothing since 4:00 this morning, six hours, no care, no one changed me. Clinical record review for Resident 5 revealed a significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that assessed Resident 5 as without cognitive deficits (BIMS, Brief Interview for Mental Status, score of 15 out of 15), frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel, dependent on staff for toileting, and that he required substantial to maximum assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness in the main kitchen and the facility's pantry for three of three nursing units (First, Second, and Third Floor Nursing Unit; Resident 70). Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food and Drug Administration's Food Code revealed that the temperature of the wash solution in spray type ware washers (dishwashers) that use hot water to sanitize may not be less than 160 degrees Fahrenheit and the temperature of the fresh hot water sanitizing rinse as it enters the manifold may not be more than 194 degrees Fahrenheit or less than 180 degrees Fahrenheit for a single tank, conveyor, dual temperature machine. Observation of the facility's kitchen on May 13, 2025, at 9:16 AM revealed that staff were actively washing dishes through the facility's high temperature, single tank, conveyor, dual temperature dishwashing machine. The dishwasher was leaking large amounts water out of the bottom of the unit and onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered medications one of 20 residents (Resident 50). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed a physician's order dated April 16, 2025, for Metoprolol Succinate ER (for high blood pressure) 200 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily for high blood pressure. Hold for systolic blood pressures (when the heart is contracting) less than 100 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) or a heart rate less than 60 beats per minute. Review of Resident 50's April and May 2025, MARs (medication administration record, a form to document medication administration) revealed that staff failed to document either a blood pressure, heart rate, or both on the following dates: April 16, 2025, at 8:00 PM April 17, 2025, at 8:00 PM April 19, 2025, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM April 20, 2025, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM April 21, 2025, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM April 22, 2025, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM April 23, 2025, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM April 24, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for three of four residents reviewed for range of motion concerns (Residents 13, 46, and 47). Findings include: Interview with Resident 46 on May 13, 2025, at 11:32 AM revealed that her legs are getting stiff. She indicated that she no longer goes to therapy and that she is not getting any exercise done to her legs. Clinical record review of Resident 46's task documentation revealed that staff are to complete passive range of motion (PROM, movement of a joint through range of motion by an external force) to her bilateral lower extremities. The program is set up in the task to be completed two times per day. Further review of Resident 46's task documentation related to her PROM program from April 1, 2025, to May 13, 2025, revealed that not applicable was documented 18 times, and response not required was documented 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed pharmacy recommendations for five of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 20. 26, 33, 42, and 45). Findings include: Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed a progress note dated October 10, 2024, and again on November 20, 2024, indicating that the pharmacist completed a drug regimen review for Resident 26 and to see report for recommendations. There was no documented evidence in Resident 26's clinical record to indicate what the pharmacist recommended or if it was addressed by Resident 26's physician. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated December 9, 2024, indicated that Resident 26 has been on the same dose of Melatonin (a sleep aid) since 2022. The pharmacist recommended to evaluate the dose or consider changing it to as needed. There was no documented evidence that this recommendation was addressed by Resident 26's physician. Resident 26 remains on the same dose of Melatonin since 2022.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance meeting attendance records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for four of four quarters (May 2024, through May 2025). Findings include: Review of facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee Meeting Attendance Records from May 2024, to May 2025, revealed the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist in attendance for any of the meetings held in the noted time frame as required to attend at least quarterly. The Nursing Home Administrator indicated in an interview on May 16, 2025, at 12:00 PM that the facility has been without an Infection Preventionist since July 2024, and there was no evidence the Infection Preventionist attended a QAPI meeting in May or June 2024. The facility failed to have all the required QAPI committee members present at least quarterly as required. Cross refer F882, F880 28 Pa Code: 201.18(e )(1)(2) Management
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a designated Infection Preventionist with the necessary qualifications responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 13, 2025, at 9:15 AM revealed that the facility's previous Director of Nursing fulfilled the position of infection preventionist until July 2024, at which time she stepped down as the Director of Nursing into another position within the facility and is no longer employed by the facility. The interview indicated that the facility currently does not have an infection preventionist and has not had one since July 2024. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 15, 2025, at 2:30 PM confirmed the above findings regarding the infection preventionist position. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)e)(1)(3)(6) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.19(3) Personnel policies and procedures 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(4)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on select policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's capability to self-administer their medications for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed the following physician orders: On March 20, 2025, Biofreeze (for pain) 5 percent gel apply to bilateral (both) knees and back topically every day and evening shift for knee and back pain. On May 1, 2025, Resident may keep Biofreeze at bedside. There was no documentation that indicated the facility had assessed Resident 22 for the ability to correctly self-administer their Biofreeze gel. The above information was reviewed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 15, 2023, at 2:30 PM. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Resident 22 was not assessed to self-administer medications. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a resident's right to refuse medications for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 69). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 69 revealed that the facility admitted her on October 8, 2024, with a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (a disorder that affects muscle tone, movement, and posture due to abnormal brain development before birth). A nursing progress note for Resident 69 dated March 31, 2025, at 1:16 PM indicated that she would not take her evening medications and clamped her mouth shut when offered them. The note indicated that the medications were then given to her through her G-Tube (Gastrostomy tube, a small flexible tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications). Further clinical record review revealed that Resident 69's medications were ordered to be given by mouth and there was no order to administer them through her G-Tube. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 15, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from medications potentially classified as a chemical restraint for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 46 revealed an order dated February 11, 2025, for Lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) oral tablet 0.5 mg by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety and agitation. Further clinical record review revealed that Resident 46's order for Lorazepam did not have a 14 day stop date and there was no physician's progress note that provided a rationale for the medication extending past 14 days. Review of Resident 46's medication administration record revealed that she utilized the as needed Lorazepam two times in April 2025, and seven times from May 1-14, 2025. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 15, 2025, at 10:31 AM confirmed the above noted findings related to Resident 46's Lorazepam. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1)(k) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code 211.10(a)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to care for and monitor a resident's urinary catheter for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: Observation of Resident 42 on May 13, 2025, at 10:10 AM and May 14, 2025, at 11:44 AM revealed that they were in bed and had a Foley (urine) catheter in place. Clinical record review for Resident 42 revealed that there was a physician's order dated May 2, 2025, for a Foley catheter to gravity. There was no physician's order that identified the size of the Foley catheter, the size of the Foley catheter balloon, or to justify the need for and implementation of Resident 42's catheter. The above information was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator during an interview on May 15, 2025, at 2:30 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: Observation of Resident 50's room on May 13, 2025, at 10:06 AM revealed an oxygen concentrator with tubing attached. Observation of and interview with Resident 50 on May 13, 2025, at 11:28 AM revealed that there was an oxygen tank on the back of their wheelchair that was set a 3 liters per minute with oxygen being administered via a NC (nasal canula, tubing to deliver oxygen to the nose). Resident 50 stated that she needed oxygen continuously at 3 liters per minute (LPM) for respiratory concerns/diagnoses. Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed hospital discharge instructions dated April 15, 2025, that indicated Resident 50 was discharged to the facility on oxygen 3 LPM continuously. Review of Resident 50's physician orders revealed no orders for oxygen usage in the facility. The above information was reviewed with the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to enteral feedings, catheter care, or intravenous therapy for two of two employees (Employees 1 and 8). Findings include: A review of the facility's current resident population documentation revealed that the facility has one resident receiving an enteral feeding (alternate form of nutrition administered via a tube), two receiving intra-venous (by vein) therapy, six with an indwelling catheter, and four residents with in-house acquired wounds. A request for nursing staff competencies for Employee 1, registered nurse, and Employee 8, licensed practical nurse, revealed facility staff could not provide any evidence either Employee 1 or Employee 8 had any competency assessments completed to appropriately perform the above care for the residents of the facility. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 15, 2025, at 2:15 PM revealed there was no evidence of nursing staff competencies available. 28 Pa Code 201.20(a)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of three residents reviewed (Resident 20). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 20 revealed that the facility admitted her on July 19, 2024. Further clinical record review revealed that a diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life), was added to her clinical record on July 29, 2024. A review of Resident 20's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the resident's dementia and cognitive loss. The findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator during a meeting on May 16, 2025, at 9:33 AM at which time the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility had no further documentation that the facility developed and implemented an individualized person-centered care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 42 revealed a physician's order dated March 21, 2024, for Olanzapine (for schizophrenia, a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions) 5 mg (milligrams) by mouth (PO) at bedtime for schizophrenia. Review of Resident 42's clinical documentation revealed no justification for, signs and symptoms, diagnoses of, or documentation, which indicated that Resident 22 had schizophrenia. Review of Resident 42's pharmacy recommendations revealed no documentation where the consultant pharmacist identified that Resident 42's Olanzapine was ordered for schizophrenia without an appropriate diagnosis. The above information was reviewed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 15, 2025, at 10:20 AM. 28 Pa.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select facility policy and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (Residents 4, 57, and 62). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 10.71 percent based on 28 medication opportunities with three medication errors. The policy entitled Nasal Administration, dated September 27, 2024, indicates that nursing staff are to have the resident gently blow their nose prior to administration. During administration, nursing staff are to press a finger to the nostril not being used for administration. Observation of a medication administration pass on May 13, 2025, at 8:35 AM revealed Employee 1, licensed practical nurse, preparing to administer a saline nasal solution (helps with dry nasal passages) nose spray to Resident 57. Employee 1 administered one spray of the saline nasal spray to each of Resident 57's nostrils. Employee 1 did not have Resident 57 blow her nose or press close the opposite nostril during the administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier precautions for one of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 52). Findings included: Review of the memo entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, gown and glove use) in Nursing Homes to Prevent the Spread of Multi-drug Resistant Organisms released by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) on March 20, 2024, with an implementation date of April 1, 2024, revealed that nursing care facilities are to use EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices (i.e., indwelling urinary catheters) during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. High-contact activity would include things like dressing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, wound care, or device care. Review of the facility's current policy entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revealed it is the facility's policy to use EBP in addition to Standard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and administer a COVID immunization for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 69). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 69 on October 8, 2024. Review of Resident 69's clinical record revealed no documentation of any COVID-19 vaccines. Review of Resident 69's COVID 19 vaccine consent form date October 8, 2024, revealed a signed consent requesting the facility administer the current CDC recommended COVID vaccine. There was no additional information in Resident 69's clinical record that the facility offered or administered Resident 69 a COVID immunization since admission October 8, 2024. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 16, 2025, at 10:35 AM confirmed these findings. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately report an incident as an allegation of neglect for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of a facility reported incident to the State event reporting system dated March 26, 2025, revealed facility staff reported Resident 2 as requiring transfer to the hospital due to an accident /injury on March 26, 2025, at 10:45 AM. The incident indicated that Resident 2 was found lying on the floor in her room with her head on the floor between the bed and nightstand. The resident was reported as having pain to the right knee and right arm, and a hematoma (bruise, a collection of blood that pools outside of a blood vessel) was noted by her right eye. The resident was reported as being sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The incident report was rejected by the State on March 27, 2025, requesting more information regarding if staff followed care plan interventions for Resident 2 at the time the incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is dependent on staff for toileting, toileting hygiene, and mobility in bed, receives the appropriate treatment and services to meet the professional standards of care to the extent possible for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 4 on August 29, 2024, at 10:24 AM the resident was observed lying in bed stating she was waiting to go get a shower. Resident 4 stated, It takes two people to change me and sometimes they wait until my shower in the morning to change me, but I have been lying here wet, and I am soggy. Resident 4 indicated she last had her brief changed at 4:00 AM. A slight urine odor was present near the resident and as the resident had her covers pulled back, with her brief exposed, the brief appeared wet and full. Resident 4 stated she has had a diaper rash for two months. Resident 4 also indicated she was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and orderly environment two of three nursing units (A and B unit, C unit; Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Findings include: Observation of Resident 3's room on August 6, 2024, at 8:18 AM revealed a two light bulb fixture recessed into the ceiling of the bathroom, which also served as the exhaust fan. The unit contained a thick coating of dust covering the interior portion of the unit visible when looking up at the light. A rusty metal washer was lying on the floor to the right sink side of the toilet base, and an additional washer was observed on the base of the toilet next to it. A large pile of black and brown debris was scattered on the base of the toilet covering where the washers were located. An observation of Resident 6's bathroom on August 6, 2024, at 8:27 AM revealed peeling wallpaper along the walls where the wallpaper met the cove base. An observation of Resident 5's room on August 6, 2024, at 8:38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and sanitation in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on April 7, 2024, at 8:38 AM revealed the following: A coffee station was observed with cabinets below the coffee maker with sliding doors. The tracks of the doors were filled with dried food, debris, and ground coffee. A household refrigerator located in the preparation area was observed with a dried white substance covering the lower interior shelf of the refrigerator and dried liquid spills on the interior door. A sliding window and wall behind a preparation table located beside the refrigerator noted above was covered with dried food splatter. A piece of equipment on a cart beside the table covered in a garbage bag was also observed with dried food splatter on the exterior of the garbage bag. A cart the piece of equipment was sitting on was covered in dust and debris as well as a dolly the cart sat on top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and orderly environment on three of three nursing units (A and B Nursing Unit, D and E Nursing Unit, C Nursing Unit; Residents 7, 27, 43, 44, 79, 84, 89, 91, 97, and 153). Findings include: Observation of the facility's B hall nursing unit on April 8, 2024, at 8:58 AM revealed the following environmental concerns: At the end of the B hall nursing unit, the wallpaper was stained to the right of the heating and air conditioning unit. The wall outside Resident 84's room had peeling, stained, and cut wallpaper. Resident 84's room was missing a closet door. Resident 89's room was missing one of the closet doors. One handle fixture of the closet door was loose. The plastic protective cover on the lower half of the room doorway was broken and jagged. Observation of the facility's E hall nursing unit on April 8, 2024, at 11:30 AM, revealed the following environmental concerns: The closet door bottom brackets were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely assessment and implement interventions to promote acceptable parameters of nutritional status for four of seven residents reviewed for nutritional concerns (Residents 46, 59, 86, and 91). Findings include: Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted him on March 18, 2024. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of malnutrition and needing a feeding tube for nutrition. There was no documented evidence in Resident 46's clinical record to indicate that an initial comprehensive dietary assessment was completed. A Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 25, 2024, indicated that the facility assessed him as being at nutritional risk and that the facility would proceed to develop a care plan regarding his risk for weight loss. There was no documented evidence in Resident 46's clinical record to indicate that the facility developed a potential for weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 13 revealed a physician's order dated November 1, 2023, and discontinued on March 6, 2024, for Ativan (for anxiety) 1 milligram (mg) by mouth (PO) twice daily (BID) as needed (PRN) for 60 days. On March 16, 2024, Resident 13's physician reordered the Ativan 1 mg PO BID PRN for anxiety for another 60 days. Review of Resident 13's February, March, and April 2024 MARs (medication administration record, a form to document medication administration) revealed that there was no documentation that staff attempted non-medicinal interventions prior to administration of her PRN Ativan for 24 of the 25 administrations in February 2024, for 29 of the 36 administrations in March 2024, and for 9 of the 10 administrations in April 2024. The surveyor reviewed the above information for Resident 13 during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's wishes regarding an advance directive for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 27). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 27 revealed that the facility admitted her on March 6, 2024, with a diagnosis of a left femoral fracture and end stage renal disease. Clinical record review revealed her advance directive to be DNR (Do Not Resuscitate, a medical order that instructs health care providers not to intervene if a patient stops breathing or if their heart stops beating). A Medical Practitioner Note (Physician/ Nurse practitioner) dated March 7, 2024, at 10:28 PM revealed that Resident 27 was severely lethargic and fatigued. Her neurological assessment revealed that she was alert, awake, and oriented to person only. The note further indicated that Resident 27 desired to be a DNR based on her advance directive. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) on April 9, 2024, at 2:12 PM revealed that they obtained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the correct required notification to a resident whose payment coverage changed for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 34 and 89). Findings include: A review of the Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) Form CMS-10055 revealed that examples of the common reasons why an extended care stay, or services may not be covered under Medicare might include the beneficiary no longer requires daily skilled care for a medical condition but wants to continue residing in the skilled nursing facility (SNF). The SNF enters a good faith estimate of the cost of the corresponding care that may not be covered by Medicare. In the blank that follows Beginning on ., the skilled nursing facility enters the date on which the beneficiary may be responsible for paying for care that Medicare is not expected to cover. The beneficiary selects an option box to indicate a desire to continue to receive the care or not to continue to receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to maintain the highest practicable care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings Include: Clinical record review for Resident 81 revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and his primary language was Spanish. He was also able to speak in broken English (you speak English with difficulty or with a lot of mistakes). Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on April 9, 2024, at 2:10 PM revealed that staff communicate with Resident 81 through one employee, a licensed practical nurse, that speaks Spanish, and some staff have interpreter applications on their phones. A Medical Practitioner (Physician or Nurse Practitioner) progress note dated March 4, 2023, at 2:33 PM revealed that Resident 81 solely speaks Spanish, but can communicate through movements such as head nods. A Social Determinant of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment to improve hearing for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 81 revealed an audiologist (a health care professional that assesses and manages disorders of hearing) progress note from an outside provider dated March 21, 2024, at 12:20 PM that indicated his left ear was impacted with cerumen (ear wax). The note further indicated that it should be removed as soon as possible by the facility if the resident allows. The facility should follow their protocol for cerumen removal with Debrox (a medication used to treat wax build-up) as ordered by the facility physician. Resident 81 should return for a hearing exam following cerumen removal. Clinical record review for Resident 81 revealed no evidence that the Debrox treatment to his ear was ordered or done. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 9, 2024, at 2:10 PM confirmed that the audiologist recommendations for Resident 81, were never reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate a pressure ulcer to prevent decline and promote healing for one of two residents reviewed (Residents 27). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 27 revealed that the facility admitted her on March 6, 2024, with a closed wound to her left heel. Review of Resident 27's skin and wound evaluation dated March 7, 2024, revealed that she had an abrasion that was present on admission and measured 2.5 centimeters (cm) x 2.0 cm with no depth. The wound bed was 100 percent covered with epithelial (a type of tissue that covers many surfaces on the inside and outside of your body). There was no slough (yellowish/white material noted on a wound bed) or eschar (dead tissue) present, and there was no drainage. It was a foam dressing and there was no additional care noted on the evaluation. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at intervals by the facility to determine care needs) date March 13, 2024, revealed that Resident 27 did not have any pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed pharmacy recommendations timely and implemented accepted recommendations timely for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 50 and 80). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed a consultant pharmacist recommendation dated February 6, 2024, for the initiation of Vitamin D3 for the resident. The recommendation was noted as accepted by the physician and signed on February 25, 2024, by the physician. Further record review for Resident 50 revealed the resident did not receive a physician's order for the Vitamin D3 until March 6, 2024, 10 days later. Clinical record review for Resident 80 revealed a consultant pharmacist recommendation dated October 13, 2023, to check a serum Vitamin D level on the resident due to a recent fall. The recommendation was reviewed by the physician until November 27, 2023, greater than 30 days from the date of the recommendation. The physician did accept the recommendation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified registered dietitian, in the absence of a full time certified dietary manager. Findings include: Interview with the Administrator on April 7, 2024, at 2:00 PM revealed that the facility has not had a qualified dietitian either full time, part time, or on a consultant basis since March 8, 2024. It was also confirmed that the facility does not have a certified dietary manager. 28 Pa Code 201.18(e)(6) Management
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility staff education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff completed a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education training each year for two of four nurse aides reviewed (Employees 2 and 3). Findings include: During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Employee 6, human resources director, scheduler, and payroll, on April 10, 2024, at 9:30 AM the surveyor requested evidence of annual in-service education for Employee 2, nurse aide, hired January 25, 2022, and Employee 3, nurse aide, hired February 2, 2016. Interview with the NHA and Employee 6 on April 10, 2024, at 10:00 AM confirmed that Employee 2 only completed 6.26 hours and Employee 3 only completed 3.01 hours of the required 12 hours of annual in-service education, which included dementia training, abuse prevention training, and any areas of weakness or resident special care needs in the past year. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(d) Staff development 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-22 · tag F0840 — patternEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to secure transportation for outside services for one of two residents reviewed for transportation needs (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed the resident has a diagnosis of hypercalcemia, (a condition in which the calcium level in the blood become too high), and hyperparathyroidism, (a condition that develops from too much activity in one or more parathyroid glands which boost the level of calcium in the bloodstream when needed), and these conditions were managed by the resident's endocrinologist. A review of Resident 1's appointments with the endocrinology revealed the resident met with the endocrinologist on March 27, 2023, June 27, 2023, and was scheduled to meet again on August 28, 2023. A progress note for Resident 1 dated August 28, 2023, at 9:18 AM noted transportation was unable to take the resident to the appointment with endocrinology and it was rescheduled for August 30, 2023. A progress note for Resident 1 dated August 29, 2023, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding the implementation of physician-ordered recommendations regarding an oral medication for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed the resident has a diagnosis of hypercalcemia, (a condition in which the calcium level in the blood becomes too high), and hyperparathyroidism, (a condition that develops from too much activity in one or more parathyroid glands which boost the level of calcium in the bloodstream when needed), and these conditions were managed by the resident's endocrinologist. Further clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a facility consultation form for Resident 1 from endocrinology dated March 27, 2023, noting the diagnosis of hypercalcemia, and hyperparathyroidism with recommendations to start Sensipar (cinacalcet, a medication used to treat high levels of calcium in the blood), 15 milligrams (mg) daily, and the resident was to return in three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medically related social services were provided to one of two residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 2 on [DATE], at 11:15 AM in the resident's room, Resident 2 stated she had resided in the room next door prior to the current room, and her roommate died. Resident 2 continued to say, She wasn't even that old, we had been talking, it was in the middle of the night, and I was up due to still having pain, then she was just gone. Resident 2 stated it was scary for her, she had never been in a nursing home, and after they all left, I knew she was gone. They pulled the curtain, and she was left in the room with her until later in the morning, when they came to take her out. Resident 2 indicated she was never approached by any staff to ask if she wanted to leave the room while her deceased roommate remained on the other side of the curtain, and again…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician ordered medications for one of six residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: Review of the facility's pharmacy schedule revealed that on Monday through Friday, orders need to be received by 7:00 PM for a delivery departure at 8:00 PM. For Saturday, orders need to be received by 4:00 PM for a delivery departure at 5:00 PM. If a medication is needed prior to the next scheduled delivery and is not in the emergency/back-up supply, please follow your regular process to submit the order, then to request the medications STAT (immediately). Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed that on Friday, September 1, 2023, at 3:48 PM the facility admitted him with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restriction of the airways causing breathing difficulty), adult failure to thrive (weight loss, poor appetite/nutrition), schizoaffective disorder (a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of posted daily nurse staffing data, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to retain posted nursing staffing information for the past 18 months or ensure nursing staffing information was posted on three of three resident nursing units (First, Second, and Third floors). Findings include: Observation of the facility on May 16, 2025, at 12:55 PM with the Director of Nursing revealed no evidence nursing staffing hours for the day were posted on the first, second, or third floor nursing units, or at the main entrance to the facility. Facility staff could not provide any evidence the facility retained any daily posted nursing staffing information for the past 18 months. These findings were confirmed with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 16, 2025, at 1:30 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (d)(3) Management
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman upon transfer to the hospital for five of seven residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 37, 42, 45, 47, and 79). Findings include: Review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred him to the hospital on April 5, 2025. There was no documented evidence that the facility notified the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding Resident 45's transfer to the hospital on April 5, 2025. Interview with the Administrator on May 15, 2025, at 10:20 AM confirmed the above findings for Resident 45. Review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred him to the hospital on April 13, 2025. There was no documented evidence that the facility notified the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding Resident 47's transfer to the hospital on April 13, 2025. Review of Resident 79's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred him to the hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$46,196 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $28,704 — penalty dated 2025-01-21
- $17,492 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.5 | -2.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/15/2022 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2023 |
| FISHMAN, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/15/2022 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MEHTA, RAJNEESH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2025 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| RUCHAEVSKY, DIMITRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395359. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.