Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 59.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens when staff used a resident's insulin pen on two residents (Resident identifiers are #62 and #70). The facility also failed to implement infection control policies for hand hygiene and disinfection of equipment for 2 of 7 residents observed during medication administration (Resident identifiers are #41 and #48). Findings include: Resident #62 and Resident #70 Interview on 5/28/26 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Resident #62 revealed he/she received someone else's insulin yesterday afternoon. Interview on 5/28/26 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Staff B (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed that on 5/27/26, he/she used Resident #70's used Novolog (insulin) pen to administer a lunch meal dose of insulin to Resident #62 then put back Resident #70's insulin pen in the medication cart. At approximately 4:00 p.m., Staff B was notified by Staff E (Director of Nursing) that he/she administered insulin to the wrong resident. Resident #70's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of issues of resident care raised at Resident Council Meeting for 2 of 2 months of resident council minutes reviewed. Findings include:Interview on 5/27/26 at approximately 10:00 a.m. during Resident Council Meeting revealed that the group had complained about long call bell wait times over the last 2 months. Residents at this meeting stated they do not feel this concern was addressed and that no one had followed up to inform them of what if any actions had been taken since the initiation of the concerns.Review on 5/27/26 of the facility's Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed the following documented concerns under Nursing:March 19, 2026, minutes: Residents are concerned that call lights aren't consistently responded to timely.April 16, 2026, minutes: Residents are concerned that call lights aren't consistently responded to timely. Previous months grievances reviewed for resolution was marked No.May 21, 2026, minutes: Previous months grievances reviewed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that insulin was administered per manufacturer's instructions for 1 of 7 residents observed for medication administration (Resident identifier is #55).Findings include: Resident #55 Review on 5/26/26 of Resident #55's physician orders revealed an order for Novolog Insulin (Aspart Insulin) per sliding scale before meals for Diabetes Mellitus. Observation on 5/26/26 at 11:45 a.m. of Resident #55's insulin administration with Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed when injecting the insulin, with the insulin pen, Staff A held the plunger of the insulin pen for approximately 4 seconds. Interview on 5/26/26 at approximately 11:45 a.m. with Staff A confirmed the above observation. Review on 5/26/26 of Insulin Aspart manufacturer instructions for use revealed .Keep the needle in the skin for at least 6 seconds, and keep the push-button pressed all the way in until the needle has been pulled out from the skin.This will make sure that the full dose has been given.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of insulin medication errors for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for significant medication error in a final sample of 19 residents. (Resident identifier are #62 and #70.) Findings include:Resident #62Interview on 5/28/26 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Resident #62 revealed he/she received someone else's insulin yesterday afternoon. Resident #62 stated that a male staff member approached her in the dining room and asked, Are you [first name omitted]?Review on 5/28/26 of Resident #62's provider note dated 5/27/26 revealed that .Nursing discovered that this pt likely received another pt's insulin (with the same first name). This insulin [pronoun omitted] received was rapid acting, whereas the pt typically receives BID (twice a day) 70/30 (long acting) insulin. For this reason, the pt was assessed for signs of acute hypoglycemia .Review on 5/28/26 of Resident #62's active physician orders revealed the following: Novolin 70/30 Flexpen Subcutaneous Suspension Pen-Injector (70-30) 100 Unit/ML…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled according to professional standards on 1 of 3 medication carts observed. Findings include:Review on 5/28/26 of the facility's policy, Insulin Pens, revised 5/1/25, revealed: .Insulin pens will be clearly labeled with the patient's name, physician name, dated used. Observation on 5/28/26 at approximately 9:30 a.m. of the 200's Medication Cart with Staff E (Director of Nursing (DON)) revealed the following: Resident #59's Novolog insulin pen (Insulin Aspart), the pen was not labeled with the patient or physician's name.Resident #70's Novolog insulin pen (Insulin Aspart), the pen was not labeled with the patient or physician's name.Resident #70's Lantus insulin pen (Insulin Glargine), the pen was not labeled with the patient or physician's name. Interview on 5/28/26 at approximately 9:45 a.m. with Staff E confirmed the above findings.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's diet preferences were followed for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition in a final sample of 19 residents. (Resident identifier is #70.)Findings include:Interview on 5/26/26 at approximately 9:50 a.m. with Resident #70 revealed, I am supposed to be on a vegetarian diet.Review on 5/27/26 of Resident #70's medical record revealed a nutritional assessment, dated 3/3/26, that stated .on a low sodium diet/Vegetarian (per [pronoun omitted] request). Nutritional care plan, created 7/12/24, revealed an intervention to honor food preferences within meal plan.Observation on 5/28/26 at approximately 12:15 p.m. of Resident #70 in the main dining room with chicken salad on their plate for lunch. Resident #70's meal ticket that read, . 2gm [gram] Sodium No salt packet! No pork; requests vegetarian diet.Interview on 5/28/26 at 1:20 p.m. with Staff C (Dietary Manager) stated that Resident #70's preference is for a vegetarian diet but since he/she has an order for a 2gm sodium diet they are only given…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident in a census of 68 residents. Findings include: Review on 6/19/25 of Mountain Ridge Facility Assessment 2025 revealed staff/personnel required listed staff by shift for the entire facility and did not list staff/personnel required per resident unit. Review on 6/19/25 of personnel files revealed the following staff with light duty restrictions: Staff F (LNA with a 10 pound lifting restriction) and Staff R (LNA with a 10 pound lifting restriction). Interview on 6/19/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m. with Staff A (Administrator) revealed that the facility considered Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) that are on light duty as a full duty staff when scheduling. Review on 6/19/25 of 30 days of staffing schedules from 5/20/25 to 6/18/25 revealed the following days with Staff F and/or Staff R working on light duty: On 5/20/25, 5/21/25, 5/26/27, 5/27/25, 5/28/25, 5/29/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide needed care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident identifiers are #5 and #17 ). Findings include: Resident #5 Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #5's Bowel Movement Size Task Record revealed the following: Resident #5 had a bowel movement on 5/21/25 and 5/31/25. Resident #5 did not have a bowel movement on 5/22/25-5/30/25 (9 days). Resident #5's most recent bowel movement was on 6/12/25. Resident #5 did not have a bowel movement on 6/13/25-6/18/25 (6 days). Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #5's May and June 2025's MAR's (Medication Administration Records) revealed the following physician orders: May 2025 Milk of Magnesia Suspension 400 mg/ml (milliliters) (Magnesium Hydroxide) Give 30 ml by mouth as needed for Constipation give at bedtime if no BM (Bowel Movement) in 3 days, start date 5/15/25. This was not documented as being offered to Resident #5 from 5/25/25-5/30/25. Dulcolax Suppository 10 mg (milligrams) (Bisacodyl) Insert 1 suppository rectally as needed for Constipation, if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain weight for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition in a complaint survey. (Resident identifiers are #16). Findings include:Resident #16 Review on 6/20/25 of the facility provided matrix revealed that Resident #16 had significant weight loss. Review on 6/20/25 of Resident #16's Weight Summary revealed: 5/1/25 Resident #16's weight was 154.6 6/6/25 Resident #16's weight was 144.0 (9.4 pound loss) Review on 6/20/25 of Resident #16's Nutrition Assessments revealed that the last time he/she was seen by the dietician was 2/18/25. Review on 6/20/25 of Resident #16's Physician Regulatory Visit, dated 5/31/25 revealed no mention of recent weight loss, under Past Medical History mentioned weight loss Review on 6/20/25 of Resident #16's documented meal intake titled, Eating Task, Amount eaten (last 30 days) revealed: 5/23 1 meal documented eaten 5/25 2 meals documented eaten 5/26 1 meal documented eaten 5/28 1 meal documented eaten 5/30 1 meal documented eaten 5/31 2 meals documented eaten 6/1 1 meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled according to professional standards on 2 of 3 medication carts observed. Findings include: Observation on 6/19/25 at approximately 7:15 a.m. of the 200's Medication Cart with Staff T (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed the following: Resident #10's Incruse Ellipta inhaler, opened and not labeled with an open/expiration date Resident #11's Breztri inhaler, opened and not labeled with an open/expiration date Interview on 6/19/25 at approximately 7:15 a.m. with Staff T confirmed the above findings. Observation on 6/19/25 at approximately 7:30 a.m. of the 300's Medication Cart with Staff BB (LPN) revealed the following: Resident #5's Breztri inhaler, opened and not labeled with an open/expiration date Resident #12's 2 Breztri inhalers, opened and not labeled with an open/expiration date Resident #13's Spiriva inhaler, opened and not labeled with an open/expiration date Resident #14's Trelegy inhaler, opened and not labeled with an open/expiration date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide timely laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident identifier is #2.) Findings include: Interview on 6/19/25 at 7:55 a.m. with Staff CC (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed that Resident #2 had a physician's order to obtain a UA (urinalysis) that had not been completed timely. Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #2's physician's orders revealed an order written on 5/6/25, UA with culture and sensitivity one time only for delusions Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #2's May 2025's Treatment Administration Record revealed that the urine had been obtained on 5/7/25. Review on 6/19/25 of Resident#2's medical record revealed that there were no laboratory results for UA on 5/7/25. Review on 6/19/25 of Resident #2's medical record revealed a nursing note, dated 5/13/25 revealed: a urine specimen was collected on 5/13/25 and brought to local laboratory. Interview on 6/19/25 at 11:20 a.m. with Staff Z (Nurse Practitioner) revealed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,842 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $38,842 — penalty dated 2026-05-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH