Rio Rancho Center
4210 Sabana Grande SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (505) 892-6603 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.3% | 11.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.9% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 2.0% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.8% | 11.7% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.6% | 14.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 5.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.2% | 14.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.5% | 86.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.9% | 22.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.9% | 15.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.65 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 2.81 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.1%CMS range 51.1–76.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.6–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 73.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.4–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
74 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 64 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-27 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly complete consent forms for 4 (R #'s 1, 2, 5, and 6) of 6 (R #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) residents, when:Psychotropic medication (medication used to treat mental health conditions) consent forms were not signed by residents or resident representatives. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents and/or their representatives not being consulted and informed of the risks and benefits of medications and treatments being provided to them. The findings are: R #1:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an admission date of 09/16/24, a discharge date of 02/24/26, and included the following diagnoses:Senile degeneration of brain (a range of neurological disorders characterized by a progressive decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, reasoning, and the ability to perform everyday activities and can severely impair the quality of a person's life),Severe vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (caused by reduced or blocked blood flow to the brain leading to cognitive decline and impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to safeguard clinical record information by leaving Private Health Information (PHI) regarding residents of the 100-nursing unit, where unauthorized people had ability to access it. If the resident's clinical information is not sufficiently safe guarded, resident's PHI is likely to be viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors, and staff. The findings are: A. On 4/24/26 at 8:42 am, during an observation of the 100 unit, a cart was stationed in the unit between rooms #138 and #140 with a computer that contained 15 residents PHI including, their names and room numbers for anyone walking by to see. B. On 4/24/26 at 8:52 am, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the computer between rooms #138 and #140 should not be left unattended with resident PHI present, because unauthorized individuals could easily access the information. C. On 4/24/26 at 10:13 am, during an interview, the Administrator (ADM) stated the computer between rooms #138 and #140 should not have been left unattended with resident PHI present. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for residents residing on the 100-unit, when:An unattended computer cart with a cup of coffee, a chair, and a backpack was stationed in the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER], blocking the entrance and without facility staff nearby. An unattended computer cart with a chair was blocking the hallway and handrails between rooms #138 and #140, without facility staff nearby. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents getting injured in avoidable accidents and putting residents at risk of serious injury and harm. The findings are: A. On 04/24/26 at 8:36 am, during an observation of the 100 unit, a computer cart with a cup of coffee and a chair with a backpack were stationed in the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER], blocking the door entrance and without facility staff nearby. B. On 04/24/26 at 8:42 am, during an observation of the 100-unit, an unattended computer cart and chair with staff belongings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment was completed for 2 (R #1 and R #2) of 4 (R #1, #2, #5 and #6) residents, when:The facility did not change R #1 and R #2's discharge MDS status from return anticipated (returning to the facility) to return not anticipated (not returning to the facility). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' needs not being met. The findings are: R #1:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an admission date of 09/16/24 and a discharge date of 02/24/26. B. Record review of R #1's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], revealed R #1 was discharged to the hospital with an anticipated return to the facility. C. Record review of R #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR), dated 04/27/26, revealed R #1 did not return to the facility and a final discharge MDS was not completed nor submitted as required. R #2:D. Record review of R #2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary condition when staff.Failed to ensure food and beverage items in the North and South nutrition room refrigerators were labeled and dated. Failed to ensure expired foods were not stored in the North and South nutrition room refrigerators. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 112 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 03/09/26, and is likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility food and nutrition services policy dated 05/01/23 revealed the following: Food and nutrition employees prepare, label, and date evening snacks including the use by date, Labels are affixed to each item and include the name of the resident, current date, (use by) date, Use by date is either added to the tray card label or on an additional label is used to indicate the use by date. Food and nutrition services employees inventory nurses station pantries at least daily and stock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences for 3 (R #25, #26 and #27) of 3 (R #25, #26 and #27) residents observed for call light access, when:The call light was outreach and for R #'s 25, 26, and 27. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not being able to notify staff when they are in need of assistance.The findings are: A. On 03/10/26 at 10:52 am, during an observation, R #25 was observed sitting in bed and he appeared to be uncomfortable while calling for staff. R #25's call light was located on the floor behind R #25's bed, and out of reach for R #25. R #25 confirmed he could not reach his call light. B. On 03/10/26 at 10:54 am, during an observation, R #26 was observed sitting in bed watching tv. R #26's call light was observed to be on the floor, under the bed, and out of reach for R #26. C. On 03/10/26 at 11:02 am, during an interview, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 confirmed call lights should always be within reach for the residents. CNA #3 confirmed the call light for R #25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident property was protected from misappropriation (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent) for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds. If the facility fails to ensure resident property is protected from misappropriation, then residents are at risk for unauthorized use of personal funds, financial exploitation, and potential financial loss. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Failure to thrive (a syndrome that describes a decline characterized by weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, inactivity and often accompanied by dehydration, depressive symptoms, and impaired immune function, among others), discharge date : [DATE] (death in the facility). B. Record review of R #2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed, when staff: Administered oxygen (O2) to R #1 without a physician's order.This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider, and potential respiratory complications. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Chronic systolic congestive heart failure (a long term condition where the heart's left ventricle is too weak to pump blood out effectively), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes revealed the following: Dated 01/11/26: R #1 was provided O2 via nasal cannula (NC; a small, flexible tube that delivers oxygen to the nose through soft prongs), Dated 02/20/26: R #1 was provided O2 via NC.,Dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1(R #1) of 1(R #1) resident reviewed, when: The facility did not have R #1's medications readily available, which prevented administration per physician orders. If the facility does not have resident's medications readily available, then residents are likely to receive incorrect or missed medication doses, which could potentially result in serious harm. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility Medication Administration Policy, dated 01/01/04, revealed the following: Appropriate interventions will be implemented for medication errors identified, The facility shall ensure medications are administered according to prescriber orders. B. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Femur Fracture (break in the thigh bone). C. Record review of R #1's Physician Orders dated 10/28/25, revealed the following: Eltrombopag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident who required additional infection prevention measures due to open wounds. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk for the transmission of infectious organisms to staff and other residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised 12/16/24, revealed EBP was an infection control intervention to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO; a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics). It required targeted Personal Protective Equipment (PPE; gown and gloves) use during high-contact resident activities such as dressing, bathing, hygiene, and transfers. B. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 64 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a complete baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident. If the facility fails to implement a complete baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for residents with complex needs and high fall risk, then staff may lack necessary guidance to prevent injury, resulting in avoidable harm such as serious falls, hospital transfers, and worsening of clinical status. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage (leakage of blood between the membranes of the brain), - Hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body); - Generalized muscle weakness; - History of transient ischemic attack (TIA; mini stroke). B. Record review of R #3's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 05/08/25, revealed R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote resident choices for 4 (R #14, 49, 59 and 71) of 4 (R #14, 49, 59 and 71) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Offer R #14, R #49 and R #59 showers per their preference 2. Offer R #71 to have his bed at his preferred height These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's personal choices not being honored. The findings are: R #14 A. On 02/17/25 at 11:15 AM, during an interview with R #14, he stated, Showers are an issue; I haven't had a shower in a while. It's been bed baths, but I prefer showers. B. Record review of the shower schedule for R #14's hall revealed R #14 should get showers two times a week on Monday and Thursday. C. Record review of R #14's shower sheets dated December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025, revealed staff gave R #14 thirteen bed baths and no showers. D. On 02/20/25 at 11:45 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated The expectation is that if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plans for 6 (R #'s 4, 14, 31, 61, 104, and 108) of 6 (R #'s 4, 14, 31, 61, 104, and 108) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Update R #4's plan of care to include Hospice Care. 2. Conduct a quarterly care plan meeting as required for R #14 in accordance with his admission date and Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment. 3. Update R #31's plan of care to include dialysis (artificial way to eliminate waste and excess fluid from the body). 4. Ensure care plan was updated to reflect R #61's current diet. 5. Update R #104's plan of care to include diabetic management and insulin use, pain management and narcotic use, and oxygen (O2) use. 6. Update R #108's plan of care to include O2 use. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' care needs and preferences, and residents not receiving the needed care. The findings are: R #4: A. Record review of R #4's electronic medical record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure drug regimen review were completed for 3 (R #7, R #27, and R #67) of 5 (R #7, R #13, R #27, R #67, and R #89) residents reviewed. The failure to review and consider resident medication regimens each month could result in residents receiving unnecessary or ineffective medications. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's face sheet dated 02/24/25, revealed R #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease in which the body is unable to properly process sugars in the blood). -Pain. -Schizophrenia (a chronic psychiatric disease that affects a person's ability to think and feel rationally). -Bipolar Disorder (a chronic psychiatric disease that affects a person's mood). -Paranoid Personality (a psychiatric disease that causes a person to be suspicious and fearful without reason or cause). -Overactive Bladder. B. Record review of R #7's pharmacist recommendation dated 03/29/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to administer medications for 2 (R #49 and R #67) of 4 (R #49, R #67, R #85 and R #105) residents with an error rate less than 5%. The facility administered 15 of 33 observed medications late for an error rate of 45.45%. Failure to administer medications without error could result in residents not receiving maximum benefit of their prescribed medications. The findings are: R #49 A. On 02/21/25 at 8:34 am, during an observation of R #49 morning medications administration, R #49 received Methacarbamal (a medication prescribed to muscle spasms) 500 mg (milligram). B. Record review of R #49's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 2025, revealed methacarbamal was to be administered at 7:00 am. C. On 02/21/25 at 8:34 am, during interview, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 stated methacarbamal was to be administered at 7:00 am and the medication would be considered late if administered more than one hour after the assigned administration time. She confirmed giving the medication at 8:34 am would be late…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of at least 12 hours per year for 3 (CNAs #1, #3, and #4) of 5 (CNAs #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) CNAs randomly reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the nurses aides not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: CNA #1: A. Record review of the facility staffing list revealed CNA #1 was hired on 06/06/22. B. Record review of CNA #1's annual in-service training, dated 06/06/23 through 06/06/24, revealed CNA #1 did not complete at least 12 hours of required in-service training. C. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated 01/25/25 through 02/25/25, revealed CNA #1 worked sixteen CNA shifts in the facility during that timeframe. D. On 02/25/25 at 10:22 am during an interview with the Nurse Educator (NE) #1, she confirmed CNA #1 did not complete the required 12 hours of in-service training, but should have. CNA #3: E. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to safeguard clinical record information by leaving Private Health Information (PHI) where unauthorized persons had access to the PHI for 1 (R #49) of 1 (R #49) residents reviewed during random observation. If resident's clinical information is not sufficiently safe guarded, resident's PHI is likely to be viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors and staff. The findings are: A. On 02/24/25 11:15 am during observation Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 left the computer screen opened and the narcotic book was visible to R #49's personal information and she left an individual patient's narcotic record face up on the counter at the nurses station. B. On 02/24/25 at 11:16 am during interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed the computer screen was opened and the narcotic book was left open and visible to unauthorized residents, visitors and staff. She further confirmed that a narcotic record was left face up at the nurses station. LPN #1 stated that none of these items should have been left out in the open to be viewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse for 1 (R #46) of 1 (R #46) residents reviewed for incidents. If the facility is not adequately investigating allegations of abuse, then corrective action is not implemented to prevent other residents from similar abuse which puts residents at risk of adverse serious outcomes. The findings are: A. Record review of R #46's face sheet revealed R #46 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 02/21/25 at 1:17 pm during a lunch observation, R #46 told Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 that the night shift CNA from the night before (02/20/25) was hateful towards him and he was upset by that. C. On 02/21/25 at 1:19 pm during an interview with R #46, he stated the night shift CNA was hateful towards him and told him he could not use his call light for the rest of the night. R #46 confirmed he was upset by that, and he felt bad. D. On 02/21/25 at 1:21 pm during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient preparation for discharge for 2 (R #104 and #122) of 2 (R #104 and #122) residents reviewed by: 1. Not ensuring the referral for services had been received, accepted and was scheduled to provide care for the resident upon discharge home for R #104. 2. R #122 discharged without and not accepted back to the facility without notice or without other interventions for their behaviors. These deficient practices could likely result in resident not receiving needed services and having to navigate referral process for services unassisted. The findings are: A. Record review of R #104's face sheet revealed R #104 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 02/12/25 with Home Health Services (medical care delivered in the patient 's home). B. Record review of R #104's physician orders dated 02/04/25, revealed R #104 was to discharge home with home health care services or outpatient therapy services to provide skilled nursing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #46) of 1 (R #46) residents when hospice services (a type of compassionate care provided to individuals who are in the final stages of a terminal illness) were provided without physician orders. If the facility is not obtaining physician orders prior to initiating hospice services, then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: A. Record review of R #46's face sheet revealed R #46 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #46's care plan dated 01/07/25 revealed R #46 was receiving hospice care services. C. Record review of R #46's physician orders revealed physician orders were not present for hospice care services. D. On 02/24/25 at 4:35 pm during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated R #46 started hospice services on 02/01/25. The DON also stated that there should have been physician orders for hospice care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #114) of 1 (R #114) resident was provided treatment and care to maintain her overall well-being. The facility failed to ensure that resident's brief was changed and she was repositioned to prevent the development of a wound. The findings are: A. On 02/18/25 at 9:30 am during observation of the long term care unit, R #114 sat in her room, in her wheelchair with her son sitting next to her. She was non-responsive and slumped over to her right side while sitting in her wheelchair. B. Record review of R #114's Face Sheet dated 02/24/25 revealed R #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Cerebral Infarction (stroke) due to embolism (blockage of a blood vessel). -Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). -Encephalopathy (a brain disease that alters brain function or structure). C. Record review of R #114's Minimum Data Set (MDS:a set of assessments that provides an overall review of a resident's needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R#58) of 1 (R #58) resident was provided with a device to reduce injury from falling. The facility failed to provide a fall mat (a soft cushion placed on the floor next to the bed to help absorb the impact of a fall and reduce injury) at the side of R #58's bed is likely to result in a resident incurring greater injury should he fall. The findings are: A. Record review of R #58's face sheet dated 02/25/25, revealed R #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Diabetes Mellitus (failure of the body to properly mange blood sugars). -Repeated Falls. -Acquired Absence of Left Leg Above Knee (amputated left leg). B. Record review of R #58's daily care notes dated 12/10/24, 12/17/24, 01/22/25, 01/27/25 and 02/12/25, revealed R #58 had falls from his bed to the floor. C. Record review of R #58's care plan dated 12/12/24 revealed R #58's plan to prevent falls included a fall mat. D. On 02/18/25 at 10:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen tank was filled with oxygen for 1 (R #61) of 1 (R #61) residents reviewed for respiratory care (use of oxygen). This deficient practice is likely to affect residents with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), shortness of breath and dependence on supplemental oxygen by not supplying enough oxygen in order to prevent hypoxia (decreased oxygen to the body). The findings are: A. On 02/17/25 at 11:22 AM, during an interview, R #61 stated the portable oxygen tank leaks, does not hold oxygen and he is unable to use it. He further stated he has mentioned the oxygen tank leak to several staff, but nothing has been done about it. He would like it to be available in case he were to need the oxygen. B. Record review of R #61's physicians order dated 02/01/25, revealed 2l (liters) via NC (nasal cannula-tube used to deliver the oxygen) to keep O2(oxygen) SATS (saturation-the percentage of oxygen in your blood) greater than 92% (percent) PRN (as needed). C. Record review of R #61's medical diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were: 1. Stored properly 2. Narcotics given when signed out on the narcotic book. These deficient practices are likely to result in inaccurate medication counts and residents not getting the desired therapeutic results if medications are not administered as ordered. The findings are: A. On 02/24/25 at 11:01 am, during an observation of the south side medication cart revealed five unidentified loose pills on the bottom of the second drawer. During a count of the narcotic's kept in the medication cart there was a medication Pregabalin (used to treat pain) that had been signed out as administered to R #49 and medication was still present in the medication card. B. During interview with Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #, she confirmed there were five loose unidentified medications in medication cart and they should not be there, CMA #1 further confirmed that she had signed out the Pregabalin as administered to R #49 and she had not administered the medication as the Medication Administration Record (MAR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at an appetizing temperature for 1 (R #97) of 1 (R #97) residents reviewed for meal quality. This deficient practice may decrease the resident's quality of life and have the potential to cause weight loss due to the food not being the proper temperature. The findings are: A. On 02/18/25 at 1:18 pm, during an interview, R #97 stated the food is cold a lot of times for lunch when it is delivered to his room. B. On 02/24/25 at 1:22 pm, during an observation of lunch, revealed the following temperatures for the lunch test tray pulled for R #97: -Tamale was at 117 degrees Fahrenheit -Black beans was at 110 degrees Fahrenheit -Coleslaw was at 112 degrees Fahrenheit C. On 02/24/2025 at 1:22 pm, during an interview with the DC, she stated the temperatures taken for R #97 were not at the appropriate temperatures. D. On 02/24/25 at 1:22 pm, during an interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the food tested for R #97 at 1:22 pm was not at the correct temperature. The DC confirmed the food should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food preference was followed for 1 (R#97) of 1 (R #97) observed for dining observation., This deficient practice could result in the resident not eating and losing weight. A. On 02/18/25 at 1:24 pm, during interview, R #97 stated I don't like eggs and they keep giving me eggs that are cold for breakfast. B. On 02/19/25 at 8:45 am, during an observation of R #97's breakfast, there were eggs on his breakfast plate which he had not eaten. C. Record review of R #97's meal ticket revealed the meal tick did not have any indication of R #97 disliking eggs. D. On 02/24/25 at 1:52 pm during an interview, Dietary Manager (DM) stated she interviews residents upon admission and she reviews their preferences every quarterly, or as needed. She confirmed that she did not know R #97 did not like eggs.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete for 1 (R #89) of 1 (R #89) residents reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not having the information they need to provide competent, comprehensive care and services to residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #89's face sheet revealed R #89 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #89's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR: a federally required screening of any individual who applies to or resides in a Medicaid-certified nursing facility) was not available for review in the EMR. C. On 02/20/25 at 11:32 AM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was not a PASRR in R #89's EMR available for review and PASSR should be included in any admission to a medicaid certified nursing facility.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was collaboration between the facility and hospice services for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) residents reviewed for hospice services by not developing a coordinated plan of care for the resident. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents not receiving the services needed. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS: a set of evaluations and review that provide an overall picture of a persons needs and abilities) Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs revealed the resident was on hospice care. B. On 02/19/25 at 1:42 PM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing in Training (DON-IT) stated a hospice binder (a binder that contains written communication between the facility and the hospice provider to include the coordinated plan of care) should be kept at the nurse's station or in medical records for R #4 so that staff are aware of the care that's needed/provided by the hospice provider. C. On 02/20/25 at 11:40 AM, during an interview, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Past Noncompliance Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that bathing/showering assistance was provided for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living). This deficient practice could likely result in residents in need of this specialized care experiencing a decline in their ability to perform hygiene tasks and maintain good personal hygiene. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet dated 10/02/23 revealed this as R #1's an initial admission date with the following list of diagnoses: -Unspecified dementia, (a group of symptoms dealing with affecting memory, thinking and abilities). -Unspecified urinary incontinence, (loss of bladder control). -Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, (low oxygen in the blood). -Nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis (narrowing of the aortic valve). B. Record review of R #1's shower tracking sheet provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the shower days for R #1 are scheduled for Mondays and Thursdays. The shower sheets also revealed that R #1 had not had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents ) for 1(R #3) of 3 (R #'s 2, 3 and 4 ) resident reviewed. If the MDS assessment is inaccurate, then residents are likely to not receive the services they need or have an accurate record of the services needed and received. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's Face Sheet dated 09/11/24, revealed R #3's an initial admission date and included the following diagnoses: -Sepsis (an infection of the blood stream,), -Urinary tract infection (infection of any part of the urinary system), infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder when there is an issue with voiding urine), -Benign prostatic hyperplasia (condition in which an overgrowth of prostate [organ in male reproductive system]) with lower urinary tract symptoms, -Obstruction and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive their meals in accordance with the menu schedule for 2 (R #'s 2, and 5) of 3 (R #'s 2, 4 and 5) residents reviewed during meal observations. If the facility is not ensuring that meals are served timely as scheduled, then residents are likely to be at risk of malnutrition and frustration. The findings are: A. Record review of the Facility's Meal Schedule revealed, Breakfast: 7:15 am, Lunch: 12:00 pm, and Dinner: 5:15 pm. B. On 11/14/24 during a meal schedule observation revealed a lunch meal cart was delivered to one hall at 1:12 pm and another lunch meal cart was delivered to the neighboring hall at 1:27 pm. R #'s 2 and 3 were roommates, R #2 received one lunch meal tray at 1:28 pm, R #3 did not receive a lunch meal tray until 1:43 pm. C. On 11/14/24 at 1:36 pm during an interview with the Director of Nursing, she stated that the kitchen forgot to send a lunch tray for R #3 and that this does happen often. She further stated that meals are often served late. D. On 11/14/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) at least 8 hours during each 24 hour period. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 114 residents on the census list provided by the Administrator on 08/13/24. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving the services they required. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's staffing schedule for the months of April, May, June, and July 2024 revealed there was not a Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled to provide direct patient care on the following days: 1. April 7, 13, 14, 21, 22, 27, 28. 2. May 11, 31. 3. June 3, 10, 24. 4. July 1, 2 16, 30. B. On 08/15/24 at 1:23 pm, during an interview, the Scheduling Manager and the Administrator stated they were aware they did not always have a Registered Nurse on schedule. The Scheduling Manger stated they have been short on nurses.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality by not maintaining accurate weights for 1 (R #14) of 3 (R #13, 14 and #15) residents sampled for nutrition. This deficient practice could likely result in resident nutrition to not be accurately assessed, causing a potential for unidentified medical issues or weight gain or loss. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #14 indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Altered mental status (abnormal state of alertness and awareness), - Parkinson's disease (is a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system in parts of the body controlling nerves), - Ulcerative chronic proctitis (inflammation to the rectum), - Vascular dementia (brain damage due to impaired blood flow to the brain), - Severe protein-calorie malnutrition (not enough nutrition). - R #14 was discharged on 02/24/24. - This is not an all inclusive list. B. Record review of the physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure they had sufficient staff to meet the needs of all 113 residents residing in the facility when staff failed to. 1. Offer baths or showers to residents as scheduled; 2. Answer call lights timely to meet the needs of the residents. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact resident safety, comfort, and to impede processes such as timely incontinence care (assisting residents to the bathroom or changing adult briefs), regular turning schedules (moving or turning residents that need assistance and are unable to move on their own), showers, and appropriate assistance with meals. The findings are: Baths/Showers Findings: Findings for R #14: A. Record review of R #14's face sheet revealed R #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #14's care plan, dated 07/05/23, revealed the following: - Focus: R #14 required assistance and was dependent for ADL care in bathing due to right hemiparesis (weakness of one side) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote residents choices for 5 (R #'s 16, 76, 94, 95, and 96) of 5 (R #'s 16, 76, 94, 95, and 96) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Offer R #16 showers per his preference. 2. Ensure medical appointments were not missed due to lack of transportation for R #'s 76, 95, and 96. 3. Ensure R #94 was provided clothing that fit and ensure she had clothing available. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's personal choices, poor hygiene, needs, and preferences not being honored. The findings are: Shower Preference Findings: R #16 A. On 02/13/24, at 4:02 pm, during an interview with R #16, he stated he did not get showers according to his shower schedule, and he did not refuse them. R #16 stated the last time he received a shower was 02/07/23, and he would like showers as scheduled. B. Record Review of shower schedule, dated 02/20/24, revealed R #16 was scheduled for showers on Monday, Wednesday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify residents of the findings of their grievances. This deficient practice is likely to result in the facility not considering the needs of the residents. The findings are: A. On 02/14/24, at 9:11 AM, during an interview with Resident's Council (RC) members, residents present in the meeting stated the facility did not act promptly with grievance responses and many times they do not get a response at all. The RC members stated they did not know if grievances were acted upon. They said the facility staff tell them they are working on it or they are looking into it. The RC members stated that was where it ended. B. Record review of the resident grievance forms, dated 11/23 through 02/24, revealed the forms were blank under the resolution of grievance section, which indicated a resolution had not been completed for the grievance. C. On 02/19/24, at 11:58 AM, during an interview with Social Services Director (SSD), she stated grievances were written on a grievance form and given to each department to follow up on. The SSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-19 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 2 (R #'s 92 and 107) of 3 (R #s 39, 92, and 107) residents reviewed for timely Beneficiary Protection Notification received the correct notifications form 10055: Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) . This deficient practice can result in confusion for the resident or their representative as to what services they have or do not have financial coverage for. The findings are: A. Record review of Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review for R #92 revealed the following: 1. The record did not contain documentation to show staff issued CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Service) form 10055: Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) to R #92 who intended to continue services. The facility provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. B. Record review of SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review for R #107 revealed the following: 1. The record did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care plan meetings as required for 3 (R #'s 19, 25, and 73) of 3 (R #'s 19, 25, and 73) residents reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' care needs and preferences, and residents not receiving the needed care. The findings are: Findings for R #19: A. On 02/16/24, at 11:22 AM, during an interview with Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated the last care conference for R #19 was on 04/06/22. She further stated care conferences should be held quarterly, and R #19's care conference was not. Findings for R #25: B. Record review of R #25's face sheet revealed R #25 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. C. Record review of R #25's care plan meeting progress notes revealed R #25's last care plan meeting occurred on 07/11/23. D. On 02/13/24 at 12:06 pm during an interview with R #25, she stated, I haven't had one of those [care plan meetings] in awhile. E. On 02/19/24 at 11:51…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 5 (R #'s 8, 11, 14, 21, and 73) of 5 (R #'s 8, 11, 14, 21, and 73) residents when staff failed to: 1. Label, date, and change oxygen (O2; labeling and date as to when the O2 was replaced with new tubing) for R #'s 11, 14, and 73. 2. Ensure humidifier bottles (bottles with distilled water used to provide humidity) on O2 were full for R #8 and #21 If the facility is not changing and labeling oxygen tubingand not ensuring humidifier bottles were full then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: O2 Tubing Findings: Findings for R #11: A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed R #11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #11's physician orders, dated 01/16/24, revealed an order to change oxygen tubing weekly. Label each component with date and initials every day shift, every Monday. C. On 02/13/24, at 6:10 pm during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) was maintained for 2 (R #'s 14 and 42) of 2 (R #'s 14 and 42) residents reviewed for restorative therapy (therapy in which a patient trains on abilities they already have to perfect them and helps maintain physical abilities to perform ADLs.) If the facility does not ensure that residents receive restorative services, then the residents are likely to experience a decrease in their ability to walk, transfer (move from one place to another), and do other activities of daily living. The findings are: Findings for R #14: A. Record review of R #14's face sheet revealed R #14 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #14's Occupational Therapy (OT) Evaluation, dated 10/24/23, revealed the resident was referred to OT due to decline in ability to move without pain and ADL participation. The resident was largely bed bound due to inability to efficiently self-propel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an elopement risk assessment was completed for a resident with elopement risks. 3. Ensure the elopement book was updated to include R #34 These deficient practices are likely to put residents at risk of unsafe situations. The findings are: A. Record review of the local police department public alert, dated 10/2/23, revealed R #34 eloped from facility at 5:00 PM. B. Record review of R #34's medical record revealed the record did not contain an elopement assessment. C. Record review of the facility elopement book, dated 02/19/24, revealed R #34 was not in the elopement book. (An elopement book is used at a facility to identify high at risk residents who have potential to elope or have a history of elopement. Elopement book is typically kept at the nurses station or the front office, to alert staff of high risk elopement residents, and it typically contans a picture of the resident.) D. On 2/19/24 at 3:16 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), he stated R #34 had eloped from facility twice,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (R #62, and R #118) of 2 (R #62 and R #118) residents when staff failed to: 1. Ensure oxygen was not administered without a physician's order. 2. Ensure oxygen was administered in accordance with the physician's orders 3. Ensure BIPAP (machine that can help push air into lungs) was administered in accordance with physician's orders. If the facility is not administering oxygen as prescribed and without an order then the residents are likely to not get the therapeutic results as needed or administered if not needed. The findings are: Findings for R #62 A. On 02/13/24 at 11:29 am during random observation, R #62 sat in her wheelchair and used a portable oxygen tank via nasal cannula [NC; oxygen tubing with nasal prongs used to receive oxygen (O2) from an oxygen delivery device, such as a portable oxygen or oxygen concentrator.] B. On 02/13/24 at 11:30 am during interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, she reviewed physician's orders for R #62 and confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff communicated and collaborated with the dialysis (clinical purification of blood as substitute for normal kidney functioning) facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 (R #94) of 1 (R #94) residents reviewed for dialysis. If the facility is unaware of the status, condition, or complications that arise during dialysis treatment then residents are likely not to receive the appropriate monitoring and care they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #94's face revealed R #94 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #94's dialysis schedule revealed R #94 had dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays from 9:00 am to 1:30 pm. C. Record review of R #94's dialysis communication record (communication form used to communicate between the facility and the dialysis center about the patients status), dated 12/01/23 through 12/31/23, revealed the following: 1. Six dialysis communication records were provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #109) of 1 (R #109) resident's reconciliation (the process of ensuring the number on the medication log and the number of pills in the container are the same) of medication log was accurate. Failure to accurately document when medications are dispensed and administered are likely to cause medication errors resulting in over-dosing or under-dosing residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the controlled substance (drugs that are regulated by state and federal laws) records, dated 02/12/24, for the north wing medication cart revealed the following: Reconciliation of the controlled substance log for R #109's oxycodone immediate (a medication used for pain), 5 milligram (mg) tablet and the blister pack (a tamper-evident packaging where an individual pushes individually sealed tablets through the foil in order to take the medication) for the same medication did not match. The number on the blister pack was five and the number on the reconciliation sheet was six. B. On 02/12/24, at 12:50 PM, during interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 (R #34, 51, 65, 76) of 5 (R #9, 34, 51, 65, 76) resident's medications were reviewed by the pharmacist and physician and acted on. These deficient practices are likely to cause residents to receive unnecessary medications, experience potential unnecessary drug interactions or adverse side effects. The findings are: A. Record review of monthly pharmacy review, dated June 2023, revealed a pharmacist reviewed all residents' medications and made the following recommendations: 1. Findings for R #34 - Recommendation to reevaluate medications and consider reducing quetiapine (medication used to treat psychiatric disorders). - R #34 received amoxicillin (a medication to treat bacterial infections), but the medication did not have a stop date. Pharmacist recommendation was to document a stop date. - The monthly review form did not contain any indication the provider reviewed and responded to the recommendations. 2. Findings for R #51 - Resident cannot swallow medications whole and received omeprazole (a medication used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the Physician for 1 (R #110) of 2 (R #110 and 156) residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice is likely to result in a resident failing to obtain maximum wellness and/or suffering prolonged illness. The findings are: A. Record review of R #110's face sheet, dated 02/19/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (a chronic disease that causes too much sugar in the blood). B. Record review of R #110's physician order, dated 02/08/24, revealed an order to adminster insulin (a hormone medication that helps control the sugar found in blood) lispro (a fast acting insulin) subcutaneous (below the skin) cartridge, 100 unit/milliliters (ml). Inject 6 units subcutaneously before meals for DM. C. Record review of R #110's care plan, dated 09/28/23, revealed the following: - Focus: resident has a diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications and other medical supplies were properly stored and not expired. 2. Ensure temperatures for medication room and refrigerators were monitored daily as per facility procedure. 3. Ensure medication carts were locked when not in use. This deficient practice is likely to result in medications losing their potency and affect the quality of specimens needed for lab tests. The findings are: Medication Cart and Medication Room Storage Findings: A. On 02/12/24 at 12:30 PM during observation of the South Medication Room revealed the following: - One box nicotine patches (used to reduce cravings for nicotine and to help prevent withdrawal symptoms) expired 1/24. - One bottle, 1.5 calorie, 33.8 ounce, peptide-based high protein Osmolite therapeutic nutrition expired 2/1/24. - One bottle gabapentin, 250 milliliters (ml), oral solution (medication used to help relieve nerve pain) expired 1/20/24. - One bottle omeprazole, 2 milligram (mg), oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to deliver meals consistently and timely for all 113 residents in the facility. This deficient practice could potentially lead to frustration and hunger. The findings are: A. Record review of mealtimes posted in the dining room revealed all food trays are scheduled to be served by : 1. Breakfast scheduled at 7:15 am. 2. Lunch scheduled at 12:00 pm. 3. Dinner scheduled at 5:15 pm. B. On 02/12/24 at 1:04 pm during observation of lunch, residents in their rooms and had not received their lunch meals. C. On 02/13/24 at 1:14 pm during observation of lunch, staff delivered South Unit meal trays to the unit. D. On 02/13/24 at 6:28 pm during observation of dinner, staff delivered South Unit meal trays to the unit. E. On 02/15/24 at 1:49 pm during observation of lunch, residents in their rooms and had not received their meals. F. On 02/15/24 at 1:50 pm during an interview with R #76, he stated, I'm starving and my stomach is growling. I came out to see when I was finally going to get my lunch. R #76 stated meals are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, 2022 edition, for 2 (R #8 and #9) of 2 (R #8 and #9) residents observed for hot food temperature. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents getting a foodborne illness or having weight loss. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24 at 4:14 pm, during and interview, R #8 stated the food was often served cold. R #8 would like her food to be served hot. B. On 02/13/24 at 2:34 pm during an interview with R #9, she stated the food was always cold. She said she liked to eat her food hot, and it was cold quite often. C. Record review of the menu for lunch meal on 02/15/24 revealed the following: 1. Turkey garden burger. 2. Creamy coleslaw. 3. Ranch style beans. 4. Beverage of choice. D. On 02/15/2024 at 1:49 pm, observation of food temperatures of the lunch meal room trays on the South Hall, taken by the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed the following: 1. Turkey Garden Burger measured 115.8 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F), 2. Creamy Coleslaw measured 64° F…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-19 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff offered COVID -19 (a highly infectious viral disease) vaccinations to 2 (R #'s 63 and 76) of 4 (R #37, #40, #63, #76, and #110) residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccines. This deficient practice could likely result in residents at risk of exposure to COVID-19 related infections. The findings are: Findings for R #63: A. Record review of R #63's face sheet revealed R #63 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #63's immunization record, located in the Electronic Health Record (EHR), revealed staff administered R #63's last COVID-19 vaccine on 10/21/22. C. On 02/13/24 at 2:46 pm during an interview with R #63, he stated he wanted the COVID-19 booster and asked for it for several months. R #63 stated the staff have not offered him the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings for R #76: D. Record review of R #76's face sheet revealed R #76 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. E. Record review of R #76's immunization record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to properly inform 1 (R #93) of 1 (R #93) resident of treatment decisions by failing to utilize interpreter line (service used for communication) to communicate with resident in a language the resident could understand. If the facility is not able to communicate with residents then residents are likely not to get their needs met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #93's face sheet revealed an admission date of 10/12/23 to the facility with the following diagnoses: 1. Cyst of pancreas (saclike pockets of fluid on or in your pancreas) , 2. Major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), 3. Personal history of suicidal behavior (talking about or taking actions related to ending one's own life), 4. Ulcerative colitis (a chronic condition that happens when you have inflammation in your colon), 5. Age-related cognitive decline (normal age-related decline in thinking and memory). B. On 02/13/24 at 1:05 pm during an interview, the Social Services Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean, in good condition, and had basic toiletries (paper towels, etc) for 2 (R #'s 61 and 109) of 2 (R #'s 61 and 109) residents sampled for a homelike environment. Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to result in unsafe conditions and prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24, at 12:40 pm, during random observation of R #61 and R #109's room, the floor was sticky, dirty, and had debris on it. The resident's room did not have any paper towels available for residents or staff use. B. On 02/12/24, during interview with R #61 and R #109, both residents stated they did not have any paper towels in the bathroom for their use. They further stated the floor had not been mopped in several days, and it was sticky and dirty. Both residents stated they are unhappy about the dirty floor and not having paper towels to dry their hands. C. On 02/12/24, at 12:44 pm, during an interview with Housekeeper (HK) #1, she stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R # 40) of 1 (R #40) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized damage to skin/tissue occurs as a result of pressure) and pain. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents experiencing pain or a worsened condition. The findings are: A. On 02/19/24 at 10:48 am during wound care observation and interview, License Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 removed R #40's brief, which revealed multiple small round blisters to R #40's lateral (the side of the body or a body part that is farther from the middle or center of the body) inner thighs, left lower abdomen, and right outer thigh. Further observation revealed the blisters bled and drained a clear fluid. LPN #3 stated she was unaware of these blisters. She said staff did not document the blisters, and they were not being treated at this time. LPN #3 stated she had not contacted the physician for orders, because she was unaware of the blisters. B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received foot treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 ( R #62) of 1 (R #62) residents reviewed for foot care and dressing changes. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents experiencing worsened wound conditions. The findings are: A. On 02/13/24, at 11:12 am, during observation, R #62 sat on her bed with the bandage to her left foot exposed. The bandage on R #62's left foot had a date of 02/11/24, which indicated staff last changed the bandage two days prior to the observation. B. Record review of R #62's physician orders, dated 01/27/24, revealed the following order for wound care: Cleanse second toe (toe to left of the big toe) of left foot with wound cleanser (antiseptic solution used to clean wounds), pat dry, and apply skin barrier (cream used to prevent skin breakdown) to peri-wound (around the wound) area. Apply betadine (antiseptic solution that kills and prevents the growth of bacteria) to injured toe, cover with a non-adherent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food according to the residents meal tickets for 4 (R #25, R # 32 , R #64, and R #93) of 4 (R #25, R # 32 , R #64, and R #93) residents observed during lunch. This deficient practice is likely to result in weight loss due to residents not meeting caloric intake goals. The findings are: Findings for R #25: A. Record review of R #25's meal ticket, dated 02/16/24, revealed a regular/liberalized diet (non-restrictive), gravy on the side when meat is served. Lunch: 6 ounce (oz) assorted beverage, 1/2 cup mixed vegetables, 1/2 cup seasonal fresh fruit, 1/2 creamy peanut butter and jelly sandwich, 1 chicken fillet on roll, and 1 oz ladle brown gravy. B. On 02/16/24 at 1:16 pm during lunch observation and an interview, staff served R #25 a chicken sandwich, steamed vegetables, and did not serve gravy. R #25 stated, I really wanted the gravy. C. On 02/16/24 at 1:17 pm during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, she confirmed staff did not serve R #25 gravy on the side and should have. D. On 02/19/24 at 4:30 pm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a garbage can was covered and not placed in a food storage area. This practice had the potential to affect all 113 residents, as listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 02/12/24, by attracting insects and rodents into the facility. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24 at 12:35 pm, an observation of the kitchen, revealed one garbage can, located in the kitchen's dry storage room, was full of trash and did not have a lid. B. On 02/12/24 at 1:15 pm during an interview with the Health Care Service District Manager (DM), she confirmed the uncovered garbage can should not be in the dry food storage area.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper infection control practices when staff failed to: 1. Wash hands before and change gloves after performing peri-care (cleaning the private areas of a resident) and prior to cleaning wound. 2. Change gloves after administering wound care. 3. Ensure clean bandages did not touch a non-clean surface (bed). 4. Dispose of soiled bandages in proper receptacle for items that contain biohazards waste and not disposing in resident rooms If the facility is not using proper infection control practices the residents are likely to acquire infections. The findings are: Findings for R #40 A. On 02/19/24 at 10:48 am, observation of wound care for R #40 revealed the following: 1. LPN #3 did not wash her hands before putting on her gloves to perform pericare. 2. LPN #3 did not change her gloves after performing pericare and before cleaning R #40's wound. 4. LPN #3 did not change her gloves after cleaning R #40's wound, or before she applied…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-06 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge was properly documented in the resident's medical record and provide a completed discharge plan for 2 (R #'s 2 and 3) of 2 (R #'s 2 and 3) residents reviewed for discharge. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not having what they need for a safe discharge. The findings are: Findings for R #2: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/04/23. B. Record review of R #2's progress notes, dated 06/03/23, revealed, Calling [Name of out of facility healthcare provider] because patient [R #2] never returned after leaving with [Name of out of facility healthcare provider] on Friday [06/02/23]. Was told by Unit manager to call [Name of out of facility healthcare provider] and confirm where patient [R #2] is,. Patient may have been discharged without knowing. Patient [R #2] is still on chart, but is not here. At shift report I was told this information,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for baths/showers for 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #'s 1 and 3) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: Findings for R #2: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/04/23. B. Record review of R #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section G- Functional Status, dated 06/04/23, revealed, Physical help in part of bathing activity. C. Record review of R #2's Documentation Survey Report (ADL Tracking Form), dated 05/24/23 - 05/31/23, revealed staff did not assist R #2 with a bath/shower during that time. No shower sheets were available for the time period. D. Record review of R #2's Documentation Survey Report, dated 06/01/23 - 06/04/23, revealed staff did not assist R #2 with a bath/shower during that time. No shower sheets were available for the time period.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote resident choices by not assisting residents with showers per their requested schedule and preference for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) residents reviewed for choices . This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident's personal choices, poor hygiene, needs, and preferences not being honored. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #4's care plan, dated 05/10/23 revealed, Focus: While in the facility, [Name of R #4] states that it is important that She has the opportunity to engage in daily routines that are meaningful relative to Her preferences. Interventions: It is important for me to choose between a shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. C. On 09/06/23 at 1:27 pm, during an interview, R #4 stated, I want three showers a week [Monday, Wednesday, and Friday]. There's been times when I had to go without it [showers]. I was stinky and upset. R #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor residents' rights by discharging a resident to hospital without providing proper notice and planning to one (R #1) of one (R #1) residents reviewed for discharge and planning. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident experiencing feelings of frustration, fear and anxiety about where they will be residing after discharge from facility. A. Record review of facesheet revealed R #1 was admitted to facility on 01/17/22 with the following diagnosis: 1. Schizophrenia, unspecified (Mental condition that involving breakdown between thoughts, emotion and behavior, leading to faulty perception) 2. Anxiety disorder, unspecified (Mental illness that causes distressing and disruptive thoughts) 3. Major depressive disorder (Tendency of an individual to suffer recurrent episodes of depressed B. Record review of R #1's nurses progress notes, dated 06/14/23 at 1:32 PM, revealed officers arrived at facility to transport R #1 to hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. R #1 requested the writer of progress note, along…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the Physician, for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) resident reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice is likely to result in a resident failing to obtain maximum wellness and/or suffering prolonged illness. The findings are: A. Record review of R #5 face sheet reveals he was admitted to facility on 02/14/22 with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to: - Schizotypal Disorder (a personality disorder characterized by thought disorder, paranoia, social anxiety); - Delusional Disorders (a psychiatric disorder characterized by unrealistic thoughts and fears); - Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition in which the body fails to properly regulate blood sugars). B. Record review of R #5's physician orders revealed orders to administer the following medications daily: - Amlodipine (a medication that helps reduce blood pressure) oral tablet, 5 mg (milligrams), by mouth one time a day for HTN (hypertension; a medical condition of high blood pressure); -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the nourishment refrigerator in the South Unit was maintained at a cold enough temperature to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to 58 residents who resided on the South Unit out of 99 total residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A. Review of the Food Storage: Cold Foods policy dated April 2018 revealed, All time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] Food Code . All perishable foods will be maintained at a temperature of 41 [degrees] F or below, except during necessary periods of preparation and service . An accurate thermometer will be kept in each refrigerator and freezer. A written record of daily temperatures will be recorded. B. Review of the Refrigerator Temperature Log, included with the Food Storage: Cold Foods policy dated April 2018, revealed for all temperatures above 41 degrees F, corrective action was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one resident's (Resident (R) 80) of four residents reviewed for abuse. R80 was physically abused by a facility staff member. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury or pain as well as mental anguish, for R80. Findings include: Review of R80's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of brain tumor, anxiety, depression, and dementia. Review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/24/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R80 suffered from short-term and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. R80 exhibited mood symptoms of feeling depressed or down and poor appetite occasionally and she wandered daily. R80 required supervision and setup help with transfers and locomotion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for two residents (Resident (R) 80 and R31) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse for two residents (R80 and R12) of four residents reviewed for abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency within required time frames. These failures had the potential to contribute to continued potential abuse in the facility for these three residents. Findings include: A. Record review of R80's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included brain tumor, anxiety, depression, and dementia. B. Record review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/24/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse for three residents (Resident (R) 80, R31, and R12) of four residents reviewed for abuse were thoroughly investigated. This failure had the potential to contribute to further abuse in the facility for these three residents. Findings include: Findings R80 A. Record review of R80's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included brain tumor, anxiety, depression, and dementia. B. Record review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/24/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R80 suffered from short-term and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. R80 exhibited mood symptoms of feeling depressed or down and poor appetite occasionally and she wandered daily. R80 required supervision and setup help with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for one resident (Resident (R) 45) of two residents reviewed for community discharge. This failure had the potential to result in depression and/or a feeling of helplessness in R45 related to his desire to return to the community and lack of involvement of the resident in his discharge plan. Findings include: A. Review of R45's undated admission Record found in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. B. Review of R45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/24/22, revealed the facility assessed R45 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R45 was cognitively intact. There was no active discharge planning for R45. C. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized program of activities was implemented for one (Resident (R) 37) of two residents reviewed for activities. This failure had the potential to cause boredom, isolation, and feelings of helplessness for R37. Findings include: A. Record review of R37's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R37 was admitted to the facility 01/29/21 with diagnoses which included dementia, major depression, and macular degeneration. B. Record review of R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/08/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed staff assessed R37 with short- and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. She exhibited the mood symptoms of poor appetite and little interest or pleasure in doing things occasionally but did not exhibit any behavioral symptoms. C. Record review of R37's annual MDS with an ARD of 02/05/22 revealed R37's felt it was very important to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of nine residents reviewed for accidents (Resident (R) 3 and R44) out of a total sample of 28 residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents by the following: 1. R3 was transported to the facility from the hospital by an employee of the corporation (of which the facility was part of); R3's wheelchair was not strapped in, and she sustained a fall during transportation. R3 sustained injuries from the fall such as a bump to her forehead and bruises. 2. The facility failed to conduct neurochecks, complete a thorough investigation, and maintain adequate documentation concerning R3's fall and the investigation. 3. Additionally, R44 utilized a positioning rail on the left side of her bed. There was no current physician's order or assessment of the rail for safety. The facility determined the bed rail caused skin injuries to R44's forearm. The facility failed to implement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 14) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence out of a total sample of 28 residents received necessary services to promote her ability to remain continent of urine as much as possible. Findings include: A. Review of the Continence Management policy dated 06/15/22, provided by the facility revealed, Patients will be assessed for the need for continence management as part of the nursing assessment process. A urinary incontinence assessment and/or bowel incontinence assessment will be completed upon admission or readmission and with a change in condition or change in continence status. Continence status will be reviewed quarterly as part of the care planning process .Purpose - To provide appropriate treatment and services for patients with urinary incontinence to minimize urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible . Identify patient's continence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for monitoring of effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for two residents (Resident (R) 80 and R12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure had the potential to contribute to unnecessary antipsychotic medication use in R80 and R12, who both used the medication to treat behavioral symptoms of dementia. Findings include: R80 A. Record review of R80's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included brain tumor, anxiety, depression, and dementia. B. Record review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/24/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed staff assessed R80 to have short- and long-term memory problem and severely impaired cognition. She exhibited mood symptoms of feeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication, medication carts, and treatments cart were secured when unattended. This had the potential for medications to become diverted or for a cognitively impaired resident to potentially take the medications. Findings include: A. Review of the facility's policy titled, 5.3 Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals revision date 07/21/22, provided by the facility, reflects in part, Store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments, including the storage of Schedule II-V medications in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments, permitting only authorized personnel to have access. B. During an observation on 11/03/22 at 9:14 AM, revealed the medication cart in the south hall, parked between room [ROOM NUMBER]-156. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) 2 and Registered Nurse (RN) 1 both were working out of medication cart and walked into room [ROOM NUMBER] leaving the medication cart unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 11) of three residents reviewed for dental services received assistance in obtaining routine dental care. This failure contributed to R11 requiring a mechanically altered diet for ease of chewing and a potential for negative emotional effects of having no teeth. Findings include: A. Record review of R11's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R11 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure, major depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. B. Record review of R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/08/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed the facility assessed R11 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status, score of 12 out of 15, which indicated R11 was moderately cognitively impaired. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-19 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the most recent survey results in a place readily accessible (such as a lobby or other area frequented by most residents, visitors, or other individuals) to all 113 residents that resided in the facility. If residents are unable to locate the latest survey results conducted by State Surveyors, then residents, representatives, and visitors are unable to know how the facility is doing and make decisions accordingly. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24 at 1:00 PM through 02/16/24 at 11:08 AM during random observation, the survey results binder was not in the designated area (south wing hallway) labeled state survey results binder and available for residents and guests to review. B. On 02/14/24 at 9:11 AM during a resident council meeting, R #63, R #69, R #80, R #90, and R #95 stated they did not know where to find the latest survey results conducted by State Surveyors. C. On 02/16/24 at 11:10 AM during an interview with the front desk receptionist, she stated she did not know where the latest state survey results were. D. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEAK MEDICAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/20/2007 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| ARMIJO, OLIVIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/09/2025 |
| JOSEPH, CHARLESLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/09/2025 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $825K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325033. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.