Ridgewood Center
330 Franklin Tpk, Ridgewood, NJ 07450 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (201) 447-1900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.8% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 2.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.5% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.1% | 18.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 5.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.1% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.0% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.0% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.7% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.97 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 30.2–65.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 6.5–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 74.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ#171811 REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike setting. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/6/25 at 9:40 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #59 inside room [ROOM NUMBER], lying on bed with eyes closed. The nightstand table bottom door had no cover, and the cover piece was on the side of the table. The bottom part of the nightstand table had multiple personal items that include two bedpans, papers, and plastics. The regular chair inside the room had multiple blackish and brownish stains. The adjoining toilet room (with room [ROOM NUMBER]) vent had accumulation of grayish substances, and the tissue paper holder was broken. The two tissue paper rolls were on top of the toilet bowl. The closet door was broken and uneven. Outside the room, in the hallway, S#1 observed multiple vents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/6/25 at 9:21 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Cook, observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the juice refrigerator, there was an unlabeled and undated glass bottle containing an orange-colored sauce. The [NAME] stated that it was a staff member's food item and not an item for the residents. The [NAME] acknowledged it should not have been in the refrigerator and removed the bottle. 2. On a food prep countertop, there was a compact blender. The blender cup was sealed on to the machine and was observed wet inside. The [NAME] checked and confirmed the blender cup was wet inside. The [NAME] stated that items after washing were supposed to be left to air dry as it prevented bacteria growth. The [NAME] removed the blender cup and placed it to be re-washed. On 4/7/25 at 9:13 AM, the surveyor notified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Refer to F584 and S0560 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the staff, as well as herself, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), implemented the facility's policies and procedures including the promotion of a homelike environment and sufficient staffing in order to provide the appropriate needs of residents. This failure had the potential to affect all 71 residents who currently live in the facility. The evidence was as follows: On 5/21/25 at 9:00 AM, during revisit #1, to standard of 4/10/25, the survey team entered the facility and observed the posted Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) dated 5/21/25-Day Shift, current census was 71, shift hours of 7:00 AM-3:00 PM (7-3), and the staff to resident ratio of 1 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA):10.1 Residents. On that same date at 9:14 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) met with the LNHA for a brief entrance conference with regard to the revisit, and the LNHA acknowledged that the completion date for the submitted plan of correction (POC), the reason for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ#171811 and #175736 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident's highest practical wellbeing by failing to ensure that residents received timely and appropriate incontinence care. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 20 residents, (Residents #9, #18, #30, #39, #58, #59, and #276), reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/6/25 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 inside room [ROOM NUMBER], lying on bed with eyes closed. On 4/6/25 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor asked the assigned Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) to accompany the surveyor in Resident #59's room. Inside the resident's room, the surveyor observed the resident was awake and allowed the LPN to check resident's incontinence brief. The surveyor observed the LPN performed handwashing, donned (put on) gloves, and repositioned the resident. Both surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) received an annual performance review for 5 of 5 CNA files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the performance reviews for five randomly selected CNAs. On 4/8/25 at 1:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) notified the surveyor that she could not locate the performance reviews for the five CNAs. On 4/9/25 at 1:06 PM, the surveyor notified the LNHA, DON, Clinical Lead of New Jersey (CLoNJ), and Regulatory Compliance Advisor (RCA) the concern that the performance reviews were not done. On 4/9/25 at 1:26 PM, in the presence of the CLoNJ, the DON confirmed that they did not have performance reviews for the five CNAs. On 4/10/25 at 11:25 AM, in the presence of the LNHA, CLoNJ and RCA, the DON stated she was auditing the nursing staff to see when their last annual performance evaluation was done and would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor target behaviors for the use of a psychotropic (affecting the brain and nervous system, altering mood, thoughts, perception, and behavior) medications for 5 of 5 residents, (Residents #12, #21, #24, #49, and #57), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/6/25 at 10:29 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #12 walking all around the room, alert, and well groomed. S#1 reviewed Resident #12's medical record which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but not limited to; metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction from metabolic imbalances), unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews on 4/8/2025 and 4/9/2025 in the presence of the Senior Maintenance Director (SMD), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all devices used to identify call bell notifications were properly functioning. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 40 residents and was evidenced by the following: An observation at 11:19 AM revealed that when testing the call bell system for resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there was no audible notification of the call bell activation at the nurse's station. In an interview at the time, there were three staff members at the nurse's station. The surveyor asked the staff members if they can hear anything. The three staff members stated no. The surveyor notified them they were testing the call bell system for resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The staff members then stated that something must be wrong because they can usually hear audible notification of call bell activations at the nurse's station. An observation at 11:20 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire for 2 of 5 newly hired licensed staff reviewed (Staff Member #2 and #4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the employee files of six randomly selected new hire employees for which five of the selected were licensed staff. The surveyor reviewed the facility provided files for the five licensed staff. There was no license verification printout from the corresponding licensing entity to verify the staff license was active prior to or upon their date of hire (doh). However, 3 of the 5 licensed staff had a criminal background check (CBC) that contained a license verification. The following two staff had a CBC but the CBC did not contain information that their license was active prior to or upon their doh: Staff Member #2 (SM #2), a Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist, with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for 1of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization, Resident #18. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/6/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #18 sitting on the wheelchair in the day room, and the resident stated that they were hospitalized before. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but not limited to; type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy with macular edema, bilateral, complete traumatic amputation of left great toe, subsequent encounter, essential (primary) hypertension. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/12/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of the resident's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of the reason for transfer or discharge for 1 of 1 resident transferred to the hospital, Resident #18. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/6/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident #18 sitting on the wheelchair in the day room. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but not limited to; type 2 diabetes mellitus with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy with macular edema, bilateral, complete traumatic amputation of left great toe, subsequent encounter, essential (primary) hypertension. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/12/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of the resident's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that the physician orders were followed and orders for blood work was transcribed and followed for 1 of 20 residents, (Resident #59), and b.) adhere to appropriate disposal of unused medication for 1 out of 3 residents, (Resident #65), observed during the medication pass, according to the standard of clinical practice and facility policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ #184234 Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to; a.) update a resident's discharge goals based on the resident's representative (RR) wishes, b.) hold an interdisciplinary care plan meeting to collaborate with the RR on an updated discharge planning process, c.) and document in the electronic medical record , for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #9), reviewed for discharge planning. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #9. A review of the admission Record (or face sheet, an admission summary) documented that the resident had diagnoses that included but were not limited to, dementia, and adult failure to thrive (a decline in overall health and well-being in older adults). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/13/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which reflected the resident was unable to complete the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to, a.) maintain the necessary respiratory care and services of residents by following the physician orders and b.) verify the duplicate order for one 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #39), reviewed for respiratory care, in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 4/6/25 at 9:45 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the 24-hour staffing report was accurately posted and in a prominent place within the facility readily accessible and visible to the residents and the visitors. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/6/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor entered the facility. The surveyor observed that the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) that was posted on the table across from the receptionist desk was dated 4/3/25, day shift. The NHRCSR was not up to date. On 4/8/25 at 12:31 PM, the surveyor notified the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), Director of Nursing (DON) and Clinical Lead of New Jersey(CLoNJ) the concern that the staffing report that was posted and observed on 4/6/25 was dated 4/3/25, and was not up to date. The LNHA stated that it should be posted every day. On 4/9/25 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Scheduling & Payroll Manager (SPM) regarding posting of the NHRCSR. The SPM stated that she would print…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ#176708 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate accountability of controlled substances, have sufficient secure procedures in place to prevent further diversion of controlled substances, and to educate all staff on accountability procedures for controlled substances. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 years of controlled substances accountability reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and a review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify irregularity for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #62), during the medication pass observation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/8/25 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assigned to the medication cart (med-cart) located on the East Wing Unit, High Side, prepare and administer due medications (meds) to Resident #62. The surveyor observed the LPN prepare and administer Linzess (a medication (med) used to treat irritable bowel syndrome with constipation). The med was scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM per the physician's orders (PO) and the LPN was within the accepted time based on the order. The surveyor observed on the Linzess med container labeling that reflected to take on an empty stomach. The surveyor asked the LPN about the labeling. The LPN stated they noticed it and was going to call the physician to ask about it. The surveyor concluded the med-pass. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) assure that the required staff attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings for 2 of 4 quarterly QA meetings and b.) ensure there was a scheduled frequency of meetings and reporting according to the regulation and facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/8/25 at 3:09 PM, the surveyor reviewed the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Plan, dated 1/1/25, and the Center Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process Policy that was provided by Licensed Nursing Home Administrator #1 (LNHA#1) on 4/7/25 at 8:20 AM, and revealed that the facility QAPI members will meet at least quarterly. The LNHA also provided the QAPI sign in sheets and revealed: 7/24/24=10 attendees signed and did not include their titles. 8/22/24=nine attendees signed and did not include their titles. 9/25/24=12 attendees signed and did not include their titles. 10/29/24=11 attendees signed and did not include their titles. 11/26/24=11 attendees signed and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident a pneumococcal vaccine. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents, (Residents #57), reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/9/25 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #57 for immunizations. A review of the admission Record (or facesheet, an admission summary) documented that Resident #57 was recently admitted and had diagnoses that included but were not limited to; dementia, chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular, rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date of 3/11/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) test was not completed as the resident was documented as being rarely/never understood. Section O of the MDS indicated the resident's pneumococcal vaccination was up to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident a coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) vaccine. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents, (Residents #57), reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/9/25 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #57 for immunizations. A review of the admission Record (or facesheet, an admission summary) documented that Resident #57 was recently admitted and had diagnoses that included but were not limited to; dementia, chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular, rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date of 3/11/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) test was not completed as the resident was documented as being rarely/never understood. Section O of the MDS did not indicate if the resident was up to date or not with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that included effective communications for 3 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), reviewed for mandatory education (CNA #1, #4 and #5). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the annual education that was done for five randomly selected CNAs based on their date of hire. On 4/7/25 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist/Educator Licensed Practical Nurse (IP/E/LPN) regarding the education process. The IP/E/LPN stated that she started in February and that the education was done in person and in an electronic system. She added that all of the education was in the electronic system since the in person educations were entered into the electronic system. On 4/8/25 at 12:45 PM, the IP/E/LPN provided the Student and Group Transcript Report for the five CNAs with the date range of April 9, 2024 to April 8,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that included rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents for 2 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), reviewed for mandatory education (CNA #4 and #5). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the annual education that was done for five randomly selected CNAs based on their date of hire (doh). On 4/7/25 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist/Educator Licensed Practical Nurse (IP/E/LPN) regarding the education process. The IP/E/LPN stated that she started in February and that the education was done in person and in an electronic system. She added that all of the education was in the electronic system since the in person educations were entered into the electronic system. On 4/8/25 at 12:45 PM, the IP/E/LPN provided the Student and Group Transcript…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility staff had mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) program for 3 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), reviewed for mandatory education (CNA #1, #4 and #5). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the annual education that was done for five randomly selected CNAs based on their date of hire (doh). On 4/7/25 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist/Educator Licensed Practical Nurse (IP/E/LPN) regarding the education process. The IP/E/LPN stated that she started in February and that the education was done in person and in an electronic system. She added that all of the education was in the electronic system since the in person educations were entered into the electronic system. On 4/8/25 at 12:45 PM, the IP/E/LPN provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a) Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) received 12 hours of mandatory annual in-service training for 1 of 5 CNAs reviewed (CNA #4); b) CNA education included resident abuse prevention training for 1 of 5 CNAs reviewed (CNA #4); and c) dementia management training for 2 of 5 CNAs reviewed (CNA #4 and CNA #5). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/7/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the annual education that was done for five randomly selected CNAs based on their date of hire (doh). On 4/7/25 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist/Educator Licensed Practical Nurse (IP/E/LPN) regarding the education process. The IP/E/LPN stated that she started in February and that the education was done in person and in an electronic system. She added that all of the education was in the electronic system since the in person educations were entered into the electronic system. On 4/8/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation and review of a resident's advance directives for 3 of 18 residents (Resident #49, #36, #8) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/28/23 at 11:51 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #49 sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The resident was alert, pleasant, and verbalized no concerns. A review of Resident #49's hybrid (electronic and paper) medical records revealed the following: According to the admission Record (an admission summary) the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, and Schizophrenia. A physician's order, dated 11/15/2021 read, DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR). A physician's order dated 11/15/2021 read, DO NOT INTUBATE (DNI). The resident's paper chart included: an Advance Directives acknowledgement form dated 11/3/21 and signed by the resident's representative, a completed 'PROXY DIRECTIVE- (Durable Power of Attorney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ00162688, NJ00161423 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident's equipment and living areas in a clean and home like manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 20 residents (Resident #54 and Resident # 67) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/28/23 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #54 in the day room seated in their wheelchair. The resident was alert and verbally responsive. The surveyor reviewed Resident #54's hybrid medical records. The admission Record (AR) reflected that Resident #54 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but not limited to Dementia, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperlipidemia. According to Resident #54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/27/23, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted due to resident's cognitive status which revealed that the resident had memory problem with both short-term and long- term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00162321 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 4 of 20 residents reviewed, Resident #18, #69, #8, and #170. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/28/2023 at 11:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #18 in bed with eyes closed. The surveyor observed the resident with a wander guard (wander guard is an electronic device made for the purpose of keeping elderly people or people with dementia from wandering as well as alerting the caregiver whenever his or her patient breaches a perimeter or strays too far) worn on their right ankle. The surveyor reviewed Resident #18's electronic medical record (EMR). Review of Resident #18's Face Sheet (FS) (a one-page summary of important information about the patient) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #NJ00158121 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #270). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record of Resident #270 which revealed the following: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool to facilitate care, dated 7/29/22, indicated the resident had diagnoses that included but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and End Stage Renal Disease. The facility assessed the resident's cognitive status using a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The resident scored an 8 out of 15 which indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident was totally dependent with eating, bathing, and locomotion. Resident #270 also required extensive assistance with transfers and bed mobility. A review of the resident's care plan (CP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan for 2 of 20 residents reviewed, Resident #54 and Resident #8. This deficient practice was identified by the following: 1. On 11/28/23 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #54 in the day room seated in their wheelchair. The resident was alert and verbally responsive. The surveyor reviewed Resident #54's hybrid medical records. The admission Record (AR) reflected that Resident #54 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but was not limited to Dementia, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperlipidemia. According to Resident #54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/27/23, the Brief Interview for Mental Status was not conducted due to the resident's cognitive status which revealed that the resident had memory problems with both short-term and long- term memory. Further review of the Q/MDS under Section J1800 for any falls since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00162986 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to consistently follow standards of clinical practice with regards to: accurately documenting the administration of medication for 4 out of 20 residents, Resident #24, #36, and #58 as well as transcribing a physician's order for blood work for 1 out of 20 residents reviewed, Resident #8. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents conducted face to face visits and wrote progress notes at least once every sixty days. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 20 (Resident #8 and Resident #1) reviewed for physician visits and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/28/23 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #8 in the room seated in their wheelchair. The resident was alert and verbally responsive. The surveyor reviewed Resident #8's hybrid medical records. The admission Record (AR) (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to Peripheral Vascular Disease, Absence of right leg above knee, Congestive Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (QMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/14/23 reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00162986 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the, monitored, and reviewed. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units reviewed during unit inspections. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: 1. On 11/28/23 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor proceeded to perform unit inspections of the facility. While on the [NAME] Unit, the surveyor examined the declining Controlled Medication Utilization Record (CMUR) sheet for Oxycontin 10 mg belonging to Resident #2. The medication was delivered by the provider pharmacy to the facility on 8/18/23. The CMUR documented that on 9/2/23 there were no more tablets left. The CMUR then had an additional line signed with a date of 9/18/23 that there was 1 tablet left in the inventory. The surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 who was utilizing the medication cart and asked to see the medication. When LPN#1 inspected the locked control substance area, she could not find the one tablet of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices of appropriately performing hand hygiene and disinfection of a blood pressure cuff used during medication administration for 1 of 4 nursing staff members observed during medication passage on 1 of 2 units observed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/30/23 at 9:02 AM, the surveyor observed Registered Nurse # 1(RN#1) administer medication to Resident #41. RN#1 sanitized his hands with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) appropriately before entering the room to check the resident's blood pressure. RN#1 did not disinfect the blood pressure machine prior to entering the room and checking Resident #41's blood pressure. Prior to exiting Resident #41's room, RN#1 went to wash his hands at the resident's sink. RN#1 placed paper towels on the side of the sink and turned on the water faucet. He applied soap, wet his hands with water, lathered his hands for 6 seconds outside the running water prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a.) 4 of 4 Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) received their annual performance reviews and any necessary education based on the performance reviews, and b.) 2 of 4 CNA staff were educated on abuse prevention and Dementia care in accordance with requirements. This deficient practice affects all residents in the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 3/8/22, the surveyor reviewed four random CNA files for mandatory in-service education and their performance evaluation. There were 4 of 4 CNAs that did not meet the required 12 hours mandatory annual education requirements. There were 2 of 4 CNAs did not receive education on abuse prevention and Dementia care. There were no evidence of annual performance review for 4 of 4 CNA. On 3/8/22 at 1:35 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Clinical Lead Specialist Registered Nurse (CLSRN) who stated that the Director of Nursing (DON) or a designee was responsible for conducting annual performance review and the Nurse Educator (NE)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REFER to F730, F867, and F880 Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) also known as the Center Executive Director failed to ensure that the facility policies were implemented, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance were followed to ensure residents rights were observed and a quality of care was provided to the facility residents in accordance with regulatory standards. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 68 of 68 residents on their facility-wide census. The evidence was as follows: 1. On 3/07/22 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Center Executive Director (CED), CED in the presence of the survey team, the Clinical Lead Specialist Registered Nurse (CLSRN), and the Director and Assistant Director of Nursing from a sister facility. The CED stated that we have been informing Resident#26 about a room change since the summer and I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) identify, develop and implement a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan as a means to self-identify and correct deficient practices, and b.) provide accurate accountability and evidence of quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meetings for 3 of 3 quarters reviewed (July 2021, October 2021, and January 2022). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/28/22 at 10:04 AM, during the entrance conference meeting of the surveyor and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator/Center Executive Director (CED). The surveyor requested a copy of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, the QAPI Policy and the last three quarters QAPI meeting sign-in sheets for attendance accountability. The CED stated that he will get back to the surveyor. On 3/02/22 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor still had not received the documents requested from entranc and asked the CED again for the QAPI Plan, the QAPI Policy and the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to allow Residents #14, #17, #18, and #28 the right to dine in the facility main dining room meals. This was identified in 4 of 4 residents interviewed for dining and was evidenced by the following: On 02/28/22 at 12:25 PM, during lunch observation on the East wing of the facility, the residents were observed in their rooms having lunch. The residents who required staff assistance were having lunch in the day room on the unit. On 02/28/22 at 12:40 PM, the surveyor observed the facility's main dining room located off the main lobby between the East and [NAME] wings. The main dining room was dark and empty. On 03/02/22 at 10 AM, the surveyor conducted Resident Council meeting in the main dining room with four residents, Resident#14, #17, #18, and #28 . Four of the four residents voiced that they wanted to eat in dining room, and it had been missed. All residents told the surveyor they didn't understand why they weren't allowed as they were fully vaccinated. On 03/03/22 at 10:54 AM, a surveyor interviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and a review of facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an accurate inventory of controlled medications (narcotic medications) dispensed from the facility's automated medication dispensing system (AMDS). The deficient practice was observed for 1 of 1 on the automatic medication dispensing system located in the facility's Nursing office and was evidenced by the following: On 3/1/22 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor requested the controlled substances count sheet (CSC) for the facility AMDS for the month of February 2022 from the covering Director of Nursing (DON). On 3/2/22 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor asked the covering DON if she was able to locate the CSC sheets from February 2022. She provided the surveyor with the CSC sheet from 3/1/22. The covering DON informed the surveyor that she was still looking for the February 2022 CSC sheet. She stated that the AMDS controlled substance counts are done once a day and two nurses must sign off that the counts were accurate. On 3/3/22 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor requested the CSC sheet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) notify the Local Health Department (LHD) of the facility's COVID-19 outbreak for 2 of 2 ocassions on 2/14/22 and 2/15/22, b.) ensure that the facility staff was educated about infection control and other infection control mandates, and c.) ensure that the residents were monitored for COVID-19 for 9 of 9 residents reviewed (Resident#50, 14, 36, 11, 32, 24, 21, 16, and 41) according to facility policy and in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for infection control to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes updated 2/2/22, included Educate residents, HCP, and visitors about SARS-CoV-2, current precautions being taken in the facility, and actions they should take to protect themselves. Regularly review CDC's Interim Infection Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-11 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a procedure for staff testing for COVID-19 for 15 of 36 staff and further testing in accordance with nationally accepted guidelines for infection prevention and control of COVID-19 and facility policy. This deficient was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes updated 2/2/22, included New Infection in Healthcare Personnel or Residents .All HCP who have a higher-risk exposure and residents who have had close contacts, regardless of vaccination status, should be tested as described in the testing section If testing of close contacts reveals additional HCP or residents with SARS-CoV-2 infection, contact tracing should be continued .A facility-wide or group-level (e.g., unit, floor, or other specific area(s) of the facility) approach should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-11 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that a resident was notified in advance and in writing of two room changes with rationales for the changes. This was evidenced for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for room changes (Resident # 26). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/28/22 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 in bed, alert and willing to be interviewed. Resident #26 stated that he/she was previously in room [ROOM NUMBER]P which was a private room. The resident further stated that after returning from a doctor's appointment he/she was not returned back to room [ROOM NUMBER]P and was transferred to a semi-private room [ROOM NUMBER]B. The resident stated that there was no prior notification of the room change and the reason for the transfer. Resident #26 stated that he/she was satisfied with the current room status and roommate. The resident also stated that he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-11 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and facility staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to allow for open visitation which included children under the age of 18 for Resident #18, 1 of 4 residents interviewed for visitation and was evidenced by the following: On 03/02/22 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident council meeting. Resident #18 told the surveyor that their grandson had not been allowed to visit since the pandemic. Resident #18 stated the facility said no visitor under the age of 18. Resident #18 told the surveyor, The administrator does not like children. A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate care, dated 8/23/21, Section I, titled medical diagnoses showed the resident had medical diagnoses which included Diabetes, Heart failure, and High blood pressure, with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14, meaning the resident was cognitively intact. On 03/02/22 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor interviewed the facility receptionist regarding visitation. The receptionist was responsible for letting people in the building and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the representative of the New Jersey Long Term Care Ombudsman about the resident's transfer to the hospital. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for notifications during hospitalization, Residents #43 and #36. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of resident's admission Record face sheet indicated that Resident #43 had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: End stage renal disease, Hypertension and Pulmonary fibrosis. A review of the Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/15/21 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition. A review of the nurse's notes (NN) dated 11/8/21 at 07:37 PM revealed that Resident #43 was admitted to the hospital with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of the facility's policy for bed hold to the resident/resident's representative at the time of transfer from the facility to the hospital. This deficient practice occurred to 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident#36 for hospitalization and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #36 was admitted in the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to Heart failure, Gastrostomy status, and Type 2 Diabetes mellitus without complications. It was also indicated that the resident had family listed on contact list. A review of the 12/15/21, Quarterly Minimum Data Set (QMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which reflected that the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. A review of nurse's notes dated 2/3/22 reflected that the resident was discharged to the hospital from the facility for peg tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete weekly wound measurements and wound assessments per facility policy for 1 of 1 resident, Resident#16 reviewed for skin conditions and was evidenced by the following: On 02/28/22 at10:36 AM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #16 told the surveyor that they had venous wounds on the left foot and the facility wound doctor had not been in to see the resident since January. Resident #16 told surveyor Before January, the wound doctor would see me every week. A review of the resident's medical records included diagnosis of Peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, absence of right leg above knee and cellulitis of left lower limb. A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate care dated 11/23/21, indicated the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 15, meaning the resident was cognitively intact. On 03/01/22 at 09:46 AM, the surveyor reviewed the active physician order with a start date of 2/13/22 which included the following wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately monitored and assessed wound for 1 of 1 resident, Resident#59's reviewed according to facility policy for pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified and was evidenced by the following: On 3/1/22 at 11:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident#59 in the room lying in bed, awake, alert and verbally responsive. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident#59 was admitted in the facility on 10/21/21 and had diagnoses which included but not limited to Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic disease affecting the brain and spinal cord, and can cause problems with vision, balance, and muscle control and Pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4. A review of the 1/27/22, Quarterly Minimum Data Set (QMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which reflected that the resident's cognition was intact. It also reflected that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information on 2 of 3 areas of the facility in a prominent place within the facility readily accessible to the residents and the visitors. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/28/22 at 9:00 AM, upon entry into the facility the surveyors did not observe that there was a Nurse Staffing Report (NSR) displayed in the facility lobby. On 2/28/22 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor toured the [NAME] wing nursing unit, the surveyor was unable to observe the facility daily NSR and schedule. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator/Center Executive Director (CED) informed the survey team that there were two nursing units, the East and [NAME] wing. On 3/3/22 at 8:59 AM, the surveyor team interviewed the facility Staffing Coordinator (SC). The SC informed the survey team that part of her job is to post the daily NSR in the lobby area and Ns schedule at the East wing unit. She stated that she will post the daily Ns on the East Wing in a display cabinet next to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-11 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP) has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control and qualified by certification for 1 of 1 staff in accordance with the facility policy and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and New Jersey (NJ) guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the NJ Executive Directive 20-26 for a LTCF (Long Term Care Facility) included iii. The facility's designated individual(s) with training in infection prevention and control shall assess the facility's IPC program On 2/28/22 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator/Center Executive Director (CED) during the entrance conference and informed the surveyor that he had been working in the facility for 8 months and that the Director of Nursing (DON) for at least a year. The CED stated that the DON was not at the facility for two weeks now. The surveyor asked the CED for a copy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-03-11 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespreadReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the residents, families, and representatives of a COVID-19 outbreak for 67 of 68 residents on 2/14/22 and 2/15/22 in accordance with Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for infection control to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes updated 2/2/22, included Notify HCP [Healthcare Personnel], residents, and families promptly about identification of SARS-CoV-2 in the facility and maintain ongoing, frequent communication with HCP, residents, and families with updates on the situation and facility actions. According to the New Jersey Executive Directive No. 20-026 dated 1/26/21 Requirements for Initiating a Phased Reopening of Long-Term Care Facilities .5. In addition to the requirements above, CMS certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS NJ HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/22/2025 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SCHMIDT, JOSEPH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SURAPANENI, PURUSHOTHAM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $823K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315158. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.