No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Putnam Center

300 Seville Road, Hurricane, WV 25526 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (304) 757-6805 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1202 Hospital Dr · (304) 757-4590 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3860 Teays Valley Rd · (859) 552-0734 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger1.0 mi
101 Great Teays Blvd · (304) 757-7915 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(304) 562-5896 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3926 Teays Valley Rd · (304) 757-9306

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.5%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%4.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%15.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.7%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.4%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.8%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%11.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.461.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.571.841.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
28.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 28.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.2%CMS range 35.7–52.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.4–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge28.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.0–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
49.5%
Total nursing turnover
56.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-06)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who has an indwelling urinary catheter receives the care and services needed to ensure the resident did not develop complications related to the indwelling urinary catheter. The facility staff failed to ensure an anchor device was on Resident #105's catheter to prevent it from becoming dislodged. In addition, the nursing staff failed to identify and/or address serious problems with Resident #105's catheter prior to surveyor intervention on two (2) separate occasions on 05/09/23 and again on 05/10/23. In addition Resident #105 suffered a change in mental status which was also not identified by nursing staff until it was pointed out by the surveyor. Also, nursing staff failed to follow all physician directives pertaining to Resident #105's catheter and his urinary status within a timely manner. Resident #105 suffered actual physical harm as the result of these failures. He was sent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #93 was hoisted in a lift in the hall way outside of his room and then transported in the lift from the hallway to his room where he was placed in his bed by the window. Mechanical lifts are transfer devices only and are not to be used as transport devices due to the risk of serious harm and/or death to residents. The state agency (SA) determined this to be an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which placed Resident #93 at risk for serious harm and/or death. The facility was notified of the IJ at 3:41 pm on 02/08/22. The facility submitted a Plan of Correction (POC) at 5:24 pm on 02/08/22 at which time it was accepted by the SA. The plan of Correction read as follows: The Registered Nurse re educated Nurse Aide #36 and #98 on the appropriate use of the total lift with return demonstration on 02/28/22 at 1445 (2:45 pm). All resident of the facility have the potential to be affected. The Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, comfortable, home-like environment by not preventing odors throughout the building. This was a random opportunity for discovery and this failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census:116.Findings included:a) On 10/27/2025, upon initial entrance to the building, the state surveyors observed a strong, unpleasant odor throughout the building. The odor was identified by the state surveyors during their initial tours and investigations in the facility. On 10/28/2025 at 09:35 AM, the state surveyor again smelled a strong odor throughout the facility when making rounds in the facility.b) On 10/27/2025 at 05:50 PM, the state surveyor interviewed the Corporate Registered Nurse nurse concerning odor/smell in the hallways observed by the state surveyors. The Corporate Registered Nurse confirmed the odor and stated, Almost smells like they have someone that's going somewhere. I'll have them look into it. c) The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of neglect This was true for two (2) of nine (9) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #47 and #102. Facility census: 116. Findings Include: b) NeglectOn 10/27/25 at approximately 3:00 PM, a review of a FRI dated 07/19/25. The review of the FRI found the allegation of neglect was made by Resident #102 and #47. The allegation was that neither resident had received incontinence care since 5:00 AM on 07/19/25. The residents reported this to NA #116 upon delivery of the lunch trays. NA #116 got another NA #130 to assist with the incontinence care for both residents at 1:00 PM. The assigned NA #135 was noted to be on her personal phone at the nurses' station and was rounding on the other residents on her hall. NA #130 stated, I was told I had to go to the dining room before I finished my last residents. However, NA #130 did not notify the other NAs regarding the need for incontinence care for the residents. After the investigation was completed, NA #135 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided to dependent residents. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #93, #8, and #102. Facility Census: 116. Findings Include: a) Resident #93 An interview was held with Resident #93 on 10/30/25 at 10:35 AM. Resident #93 stated, I have been trying to get a shower since Monday (10/27/25) so maybe I will get one tomorrow. I have had problems before with getting my showers but I think they are getting it worked out. A review of showers from 09/01/25 through 10/30/25 was completed on 10/30/25 at 09/12/25-09/19/25 at 10:50 AM. The review found the following: No showers from 10/03/25 to 10/14/25 which was 11 days. No showers from 10/23/25 to 10/30/25 which was seven (7) days. On 10/30/25 at 10:45 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) #24 was assisting this Surveyor with the shower book and schedule. NA #24 stated, I know why she didn't get one on Monday .the NA left at 3:00 PM and the next NA coming on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure continuity of care by not seeking order clarification from the physician regarding oral medication orders for a resident who was NPO (nothing by mouth) and failed to ensure respiratory equipment was obtained for a newly admitted resident. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #66, #93, #8 and #121. Facility Census: 116.Findings included:The facility's policy and procedure for Medication Administration stated, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. If a dose seems excessive considering the resident's age and condition, or a medication order seems to be unrelated to the resident's current diagnosis or condition, the nurse calls the provider pharmacy for clarification prior to administration of the medication. If necessary, the nurse contacts the prescriber for clarification. This interaction with the pharmacy and the resulting order clarification are documented in the nursing notes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist reported any irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's medical director and the director of nursing and the reports were acted upon. This failed practice was identified for three (3) out of three (3) residents with an NPO (nothing by mouth) order. Resident Identifier: #66, #93, and #8. Facility Census: 116. Findings included:a) The facility's Policy and Procedure for Medication Monitoring: Medication Regimen Review and Reporting stated, The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen and medical chart of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regiment and ensure that the medications each resident receives are clinically indicated. Identification of irregularities may occur by the consultant pharmacist by utilizing a variety of sources including medication administration records (MAR), prescriber's orders, progress notes, nurse's notes, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), laboratory and diagnostic test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was accurate for physician orders for fall interventions and the medication route does not follow the physician's order for NPO (nothing by mouth). This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #66, #93, and #8. Facility Census: 116. Finding included:a) Resident # 66:On 10/27/2025 at 05:55 PM, an observation was completed for Resident #66. A low bed, fall mats to right side of the bed and the left side of the bed was against the wall. The resident was receiving 1:1 supervision initiated this date as reported by Nursing Assistant #51.The resident was ordered 1:1 for safety every day and night shift with a start date of 10/27/2025, floor mats x2 both right side of bed every day and night shift with a start date of 10:27/2025. No orders for low bed with parameter mattress was found. The only fall intervention on the care plan was for a low bed parameter mattress. The orders and care plan were confirmed by the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect, and verbal abuse. This was true for seven (2) of nine (9) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #47, and #102. Facility Census: 116. Findings include: b) Resident #47 and #102 On 10/27/25 at approximately 3:00 PM, a review of a FRI dated 07/19/25. The review of the FRI found the allegation of neglect was made by Resident #102 and #47. The allegation was that neither resident had received incontinence care since 5:00 AM on 07/19/25. The residents reported this to NA #116 upon delivery of the lunch trays. NA #116 got another NA #130 to assist with the incontinence care for both residents at 1:00 PM. Asigned NA #135 was noted to be on her personal phone at the nurses' station and was rounding on the other residents on her hall. NA #135 stated, I was told I had to go to the dining room before I finished my last residents. However, NA #135 did not notify the other NAs regarding the need for incontinence care for the residents. After the investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for a residents fall interventions. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents . Resident Identifier: #66. Facility Census: 116.Findings included: Resident # 66:On 10/27/2025 at 05:55 PM, an observation was completed for Resident #66. A low bed, fall mats to right side of the bed and the left side of the bed was against the wall. The resident was receiving 1:1 supervision initiated this date as reported by Nursing Assistant #51.The resident was ordered 1:1 for safety every day and night shift with a start date of 10/27/2025, floor mats x2 both right side of bed every day and night shift with a start date of 10:27/2025. No orders for low bed with parameter mattress was found. The only fall intervention on the resident's care plan was for a low bed parameter mattress. Both floor mats to the left side of the bed, bed against the wall or 1:1 supervision were not documented in the resident's care plan. On 10/28/2025 at 12:15 PM, the orders and care plan were confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards due to medication being at bedside for Resident #60. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #60. Facility Census: 116. Findings Include:a) Resident #60On 10/27/25 at 5:40 PM, an observation was made of the medication Clotrimazole & Betamethasone % cream in a tube at bedside. At this time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #69 was notified and removed the medication from the nightstand.On 10/27/25 at 5:48 PM, the Corporate Registered Nurse # 132 was notified and stated, let me have them check that there is no other medications at bedside.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to serve meals in a sanitary manner by serving a cup that had been dropped on the floor to a resident during meal time. This was true during a random opportunity of discovery for Resident #102. Facility Census 116.Findings Included: a) On 10/29/25 at 11:52 AM Registered Nurse RN #130 was observed walking out of the kitchen holding a cup can a lid. She dropped the lip the the floor of the dining room, bent down to pick it up. She then placed it on the counter as she filled the cup with ice and drink and handed it to Nurse Aide #81 who had just walked over to her. Nurse Aide #81 then placed the lid onto the cup and handed it to Resident #102. This Surveyor asked Nurse Aide to replace the drink before resident drank out of it as it had been dropped in the floor and Nurse Aide did so. b)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for the residents. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: Facility. Facility Census: 119Findings Included:a) Facility cleanlinessOn 09/18/25 at 12:25 PM observation found the floors in the facility to be cluttered with particles of paper, dust and spilled dried liquid in need of being swept and mopped. Trash cans were full and personal items were in the foor to the point of housekeeping not being able to sweep in some rooms. During a walk through with the Administrator he agreed, that in particular, the following rooms on that unit were the worst. room [ROOM NUMBER], 152, 153 and 154. On 09/18/25 at 12:45 PM he confirmed the faciity auto scrubber was down and the floors needed swept and mopped. b) Ceiling tilesOn 09/18/25 at 12:35 PM observation found that there were two (2) ceiling tiles outside the activity room that were dark in color as if something had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to offer sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: room [ROOM NUMBER]A, 150A, 155, 156A, 161, 162A. Facility Census: 119.Findings Include:a) Bedside water cupsOn 09/18/25 at 12:30 PM during a walk through at the facility it was observed that several residents on the 100 hallway did not have fresh, if any, water at bedside. Residents in rooms #148A, 150A, 155, 156A, 161 and 162 had no, or room temperature water at bedside. Observation on 09/18/25 at 12:38 PM found the resident in 150A had been at bedside eating his noon meal. He had just finished. He had no drink with his meal. There were two staff members at the door and told the Resident they were taking him for an appointment. The surveyor ask the facility van driver (as identified on his name tag) if the resident was not allowed to have a drink. He stated, he has one around here some where. He took a cup from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to follow Physicians orders by not placing heel boots on a resident to help prevent pressure ulcers to her heels. This was a random oportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #1 Facility Census: 119 Findings Include:a) Resident #1On 09/18/25 at 3:15 PM observation found that Resident #1 did not have her heel boots on as ordered from the Physician. On 09/18/25 at 3:25 PM Nurse Aide (NA) # 2 was asked if she could tell the surveyor why the resident did not have them on. NA #2 stated she did not know because she had just picked up that hall at noon. The surveyor ask NA #2 if she would please try and place the boots on the resident. When NA #2 obtained the boots from under the sink and ask Resident #1 if she wanted the boots on, the resident stated Yes, go ahead. On 09/18/25 at 3:30 PM it was confirmed with NA #2 and the Director of Nursing that Resident #1 did not have her heel boots on as ordered by the Physician.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #52, #24, #128. Facility census 114. Findings Include: a) Resident #52 An observation on 04/29/25 at 11:32 AM, found Resident #52's bathroom that adjoins next door to have 3 briefs that appeared to be soiled in the floor, along with 4 articles of clothing. On the floor and commode seat there was a brown, dried substance. During an interview on 04/29/25 at 11:32 AM, Resident #52 stated, I don't use that bathroom and my roommate doesn't either. It must be the people next door. There is always shit in there. During an interview and observation on 04/29/25 at 11:45 AM, The Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed that the bathroom was dirty and needed to be cleaned. The IP further stated, That definitely needs to be cleaned. I will get it taken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at a safe appetizing temperature. This was found true for one(1) resident investigated for the care area of nutrition during the Long-Term Care Survey process. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the facility, Resident identifier: #54 Facility census: 114 Findings include: a) Resident #54 04/29/25 8:20 AM observed Resident #54 picking at their food, when asked, How is your breakfast this morning? Resident #54 stated, Honey it is cold, I just can't eat it. When asked if this happens often Resident #54 stated, Oh child breakfast and dinner is normally cold when we get it. The carts set out there before they come up from the desk to get it to do. 04/29/25 8:35 AM this surveyor requested the temperature to be taken on the last try to be delivered on the 100 hallways. The temperatures were recorded as follows: Oatmeal 112.00 degrees Fahrenheit (F) Fried Hash-browns 86.2 degrees (F) Gravy & Biscuits 105.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an affective infection control program to prevent the spread of disease and infections. This was true for three (3) of thirty-one (31) residents observed during the long-term survey process and one (1) random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #69, #158, #264 and #25. Facility Census: 114 Findings include: a) Resident #69 On 04/29/25 at 8:20 AM during the initial interview of the long-term survey process, it was noted that Resident #69s' Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (C PAP) machine mask was not stored properly to prevent infections or the spread of disease. It was lying on the bedside table outside of the plastic storage bag that was supplied for storage. The resident stated that it is usually where they leave it. A follow up observation was performed on 04/29/25 at 1:23 PM and again on 04/29/25 at 4:22 PM and found the C PAP mask still on the bedside table outside of the plastic bag that was supplied for storage. On 04/29/25 at 4:27 PM it was confirmed with the Regional Resource Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #264 was treated in a dignified manner due to being exposed, and in view of passersby and, by failing to knock before entering his room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #264. Facility census: 114. Findings include: a) Resident #264 At approximately 10:15 PM on 4/30/2025, Resident #264 was observed in his bed, uncovered, with his buttocks exposed and his catheter tubing visible coming from his groin area. Resident #264's door was open, and his curtain was not pulled, leaving him exposed to anyone that would pass by his room and look inside. The Infection Prevention (IP) Nurse was in the hallway at the time and confirmed the resident was exposed. The IP nurse then entered the room to check on the resident, however, she did not knock before entering. When she entered the room, she asked Resident #264 if he was cold, to which he stated ,Yes. The IP nurse then asked Resident #264 if he needed her help covering himself up, to which he stated, Yes. Upon exiting the room, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide residents a choice regarding bathing preferences. This was true for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Resident identifiers: #101 and #81. Facility Census: 114 Findings included: a) Resident #101 On 04/29/25 at 2:34 PM Resident #101 states she only gets one shower a week. She prefers a shower over a bed bath but does not always get that. On 04/30/25 at 11:48 AM the facility provided a North Unit Shower Schedule which indicates Resident #101 is scheduled for her showers on Tuesday and Friday, evening shift. On 04/30/25 at 12:10 PM a review of Resident #101's care plan indicates It is important for me to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath, I prefer a shower. On 4/30/25 at 11:50 AM a review of the GG Bathing task report for the last thirty (30) days, (04/01/25 through 04/30/25) documentation shows that Resident #101 received three (3) showers and seventeen (17) bed bath/sponge. On 05/05/25 at 3:30 PM it was confirmed with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #87 was free from chemical restraints by failing to ensure a PRN (as needed) order for Ativan did not last longer than 14 days, and by failing to attempt non-pharmacological interventions before the administration of PRN Ativan. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey process. Resident identifier: #87. Facility census: 114. Findings include: a) Resident #87 During a review of Resident #87's electronic health record on 05/01/25, it was noted he had been prescribed Ativan on an as needed basis, four (4) times since October 2025, with all four (4) orders being longer than 14 days. The orders are as follows: -Lorazepam oral tablet one (1) MG. Give one tablet by mouth every six (6) hours as needed for anxiety for three (3) months. Start date- 10/25/2024 10:00 AM. Discontinue date- 12/11/2024 10:45 PM. -Ativan injection solution 2MG/ML. Inject 0.5 ml intramuscularly every 24 hours as needed for acute anxiety for 30 days. Start date- 10/25/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the care plans for Resident #87 related to non-pharmacological interventions before administration of PRN Ativan, and the care plan related to activities for Resident #33. This was true for two (2) of 31 care plans reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #87, and #33. Facility census: 114. Findings include: a) Resident #87 During a review of Resident #87's electronic health record on 5/1/2025, it was noted he had been prescribed Ativan on an as needed basis, four (4) times since October 2025. The orders were as follows: -Lorazepam oral tablet one (1) MG. Give one tablet by mouth every six (6) hours as needed for anxiety for three (3) months. Start date- 10/25/2024 10:00 AM. Discontinue date- 12/11/2024 10:45 PM. -Ativan injection solution 2MG/ML. Inject 0.5 ml intramuscularly every 24 hours as needed for acute anxiety for 30 days. Start date- 10/25/2024 10:00 AM. This was discontinued on 11/24/2024. -Lorazepam oral tablet one (1) MG. Give one tablet by mouth every six (6) hours as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide a program of activities to meet the needs and interest of the residents. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (4) four residents reviewed for activities during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #33. Facility Census 114. Findings Include: a) Resident #33 Resident #33 During the initial observation on 04/29/25 at 12:41 PM, revealed Resident #33 lying in bed, still in her nightgown with the lights off. No television (TV) or radio was playing. Resident #33 was talking out loud to herself. Further observation of Resident #33 on 04/29/25 at 3:10 PM, revealed Resident #33 lying in bed, continues to be in her nightgown. No TV or radio was playing. Resident #33 was holding and rubbing the sides of a cup. An observation on 05/05/25 at 11:30 AM revealed Resident #33 lying in her bed. No TV or radio was on in the room and the room was dark. A record review on 05/05/25 at 12:31 PM, of Resident #33's Activity care plan dated 03/17/25 reads as follows: Focus: Prefers to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility to follow the Physicians orders relating to administering medications in a timely manner, obtaining blood lab orders and following the hypoglycemia protocol as written. Resident Identifiers: #12, #24 and #101. Facility Census: 114 Findings Include: a) Resident #12 On 05/01/25 at 12:20 PM record review of laboratory results for Resident #12 shows an Ammonia level drawn on 03/07/25 at 5:53 AM had abnormal results indicating an elevated Ammonia level. This was addressed by the Unit Manager with a Physicians order to increase Lactulose to 15 ml twice a day and repeat the ammonia level in one week. Review of the following laboratory results for the rest of March, 2025 found no repeat ammonia level was completed. On 05/05/25 at 8:30 AM the above information was discussed with the Administrator who confirmed that the repeat Ammonia level was not completed as ordered. b) Resident #24 On 05/05/25 at 12:58 PM record review of the Medication Administration Record shows that Resident #24 had a documented blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct prescription of reading glasses as ordered by the Ophthalmologist. This failed practice was found true for (1) of (1) residents reviewed for vision services during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #52. Facility Census 114. Findings Include: a) Resident #52 During the initial interview on 04/29/25 at 11:28 AM, Resident #52 stated, The eye doctor checked my eyes six months ago and ordered me glasses and I still have not gotten them. They gave me these, but I can't see good out of them. A record review revealed Resident #52's last Ophthalmologist appointment was dated 01/16/24. Final Spectacles Prescription read as follows: SPH CYL Axis ADD OD +.50 -0.50 090 +3.00 OS +.50 -0.50 090 +3.00 During an interview on 04/30/25 at 12:57 PM, The Administrator stated, I feel like that is a prescription for reading glasses. Let me go talk to her and I will check on it. The Administrator further stated, I went back there, and she had +1.75. I went and got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment, over which it had control, was as free of accident hazards as possible. A mattress was left lying on the floor in the hallway. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 117. Findings include: A) Mattress observation At approximately 7:30 AM on 04/29/25 a mattress was observed lying on the floor in the north hallway, in a resident area, in front of the mechanical room and the entrance to the kitchen/service hall. Nurse Aide (NA) #66 and Registered Nurse (RN) #30 acknowledged the mattress in the floor and stated it should not have been left there. Both acknowledged the mattress was a hazard and a resident could have fallen over it.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to offer sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. This was true for two (2) of thirty one (31) residents reviewed for hydration during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #23 and #36. Facility Census: 114 Findings Include: a) Resident #23 On 04/29/25 at 8:30 AM Resident #23 states it is hard to get water at around here. Observation at that time finds a disposable cup on the over the bed table dated 04/28/25 to be empty. Further observations on 04/29/25 at 1:20 PM and 04/29/25 at 4:20 PM found a disposable cup on the over the bed table dated 04/28/25 to be empty. It was confirmed with the Administrator on 04/29/25 at 4:30 PM that this resident has not had proper hydration on 04/29/25. She agreed. b) Resident #36 On 04/29/25 at 8:15 AM Resident #36 states staff won't always give me water, they tell me I don't need it. Observation at that time finds a disposable cup on the over the bed table dated 04/28/25 to be empty. Further observations on 04/29/25 at 1:21 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide routine dental services to Medicaid funded residents. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for dental services during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 114. Resident identifier: #52. Findings included: a) Resident #52 During the initial interview on 04/29/25 at 11:29 AM, Resident #52 stated, I have 3 teeth. One on the top and 2 on the bottom. This top one hurts sometimes so it's hard for me to chew. I have not seen a dentist since I have been here. A record review on 04/30/25 at 1:00 PM, revealed a dental care plan for Resident #52 created on 10/14/23 that reads as follows: Focus: Resident is at risk for oral health problems R/T poor dentition. Has 1 upper tooth and 2 bottom teeth with obvious caries noted. Currently denies oral pain or discomfort but states the upper tooth scratches her inner lip at times. Goals: The resident will maintain intact oral mucous membranes as evidenced by the absence of discomfort, gum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of the electronic health record was conducted on 04/29/25. During the review it was noted Resident #72 was admitted [DATE] and had suffered seven (7) falls during this time. The falls were on the following dates: 04/14/25, 04/19/25 04/20/25 04/23/25 04/27/25- three (3) times During a review of, on 04/30/25, of the post fall neurological assessments completed by the facility, it was determined that one that was scanned into the resident's health record did not have correct dates and was not signed, in eight (8) instances, by the nurse completing the assessments. A neurological assessment was performed for a fall suffered by Resident #72 on 4/23/2025 at 6:00 PM. The directions for the assessment were to evaluate the resident every 15 minutes for the first two (2) hours after the initial evaluation following the fall, then evaluate the resident every 30 minutes for two (2) hours, evaluate the resident every hour for four (4) hours, and lastly, evaluate the resident every eight (8) hours for at least 64…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs by not ensuring residents could turn the over-bed light on and off by their own free will. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier #1. Facility census: 114. Findings Include a) Resident #1 During the initial interview and observation on 04/29/25 at 10:55 AM, Resident #1 stated, Last night I had to sleep with this light on above my bed, because the light switch is not long enough for me to reach. During the interview an observation of the light string above the bed showed that the string was about an inch long and that the resident could not reach it to turn it off and on. During an interview and observation, on 04/29/25 at 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that he could not reach the light string. During an interview, on 04/30/25 at 3:15 PM, the administrator stated, We fixed his lights and did an audit and fixed the rest that were not long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan regarding fall preventions for Resident #13, #32, #120 and regarding food restrictions for Resident #27. This was true for four (4) of 13 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #13. #32, #120 and #27. Facility Census: 114. Findings Include: a) Resident #13 On 01/22/25 at 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #13. The review found the care plan had not been revised regarding fall interventions put in place. The care plan did not include call light within reach. On 01/22/25 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed the fall intervention should have been listed in the care plan. The Administrator stated, we have started a house-wide audit regarding fall interventions. b) Resident #32 On 01/22/25 at 1:15 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #32. The review found the care plan had not been revised regarding fall interventions put in place. The care plan did not include non-skid strips to the right side of the bed or dumped wheelchair. On 01/22/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident # 106 was free from physical abuse from Resident #118. Resident #106 was physically abused by Resident #118. Resident #106 was a nonverbal resident who was hit on the left side of the face by Resident #118. This is true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for resident to resident abuse. Resident identifiers: #106 and #118. Facility Census: 114. Findings included: a) Resident #118 A facility reported incident dated 01/06/25 explained the following: Resident #118 was witnessed hitting Resident #106 multiple times in the face on the left side. The power of attorney was called for both perpetrator and victim. Resident #106 was sent for a medical evaluation and Resident #118 was sent for a psychiatric evaluation. The medical record review revealed Resident #118 was immediately separated from Resident #106 by staff. Resident #118 was redirected to his room and staff ensured residents remained separated while conducting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control standards for linen storage and ice storage. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: a) Linen carts On 09/11/23 at 9:09 PM, an observation on the South unit was made noting one (1) linen cart sitting between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] with the cover flipped over the top, and an additional linen cart sitting by room [ROOM NUMBER] with the cover flipped over the top and a bath basin with water, soap and wash cloths sitting on top of the linen cart. On 09/11/23 at 9:11 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #56 and NA #32 acknowledged the linen carts were uncovered and the bath basin should not be sitting on top of the linen cart. On 09/11/23 at 9:15 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 was notified of the uncovered linen carts and the bath basin sitting on top of the linen cart by room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 09/12/23 at 8:30 AM, the policy entitled Linen Handling, section 1.1 states keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain safe operating equipment kept in a resident area. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 114. Findings Included: a) Scoot chair On 09/12/23 at 12:13 PM, a leaning scoot chair missing a wheel was observed in the walk way at the foot of the beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #64 and Maintenance Director #46 were alerted to the broken chair. LPN #64 and Maintenance Director #46 entered the room and pulled the scoot chair into the hall. The missing wheel was found under bed A. The Maintenance Director #46 stated, the wheel is missing .all the bolts are loose while turning the bolts of the chair. The scoot chair was removed from the hallway and taken out of service. No work order had been placed prior to discovery. On 09/12/23 at 12:29 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) could not identify which resident uses the scoot chair. On 09/12/23 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator stated, the work order has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to reconcile the narcotic reconciliation sheets on two (2) of three (3) medication cart narcotic books reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Facility Census: 117 Findings included: a) North Hall Narcotic Books On 05/09/23 at 9:05 AM upon review of North front and back hall hall narcotic book it was found to be incomplete as per the facility Routine Reconciliation of Controlled Substances Policy dated 01/01/22. Review dates of the narcotic reconciliation books were from 04/01/23 through 05/07/23 for a total of 37 days. Normally there are two (2) entries per day as the nurses work twelve (12) hour shifts and reconcile the narcotic book each shift change (7 AM and 7 PM). This gives them 74 entry possibilities during the time frame reviewed. The North front hall missed thirty eight (38) entries and the North back hall missed twenty three (23) entries. The following entries were missing or incomplete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure supplies in the medication storage room were within the expiration date in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: #117 Findings included: a) On [DATE] at 4:04 PM during an audit review of the South Medication Room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18, there were numerous medical supply items in the storage room that had expired. According to the facility Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biological's, Syringes, and Needles dated [DATE] revision date, the Facility should ensure medications, biological's and supplies that: (1) have an expired date on the label; (2) have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines; or (3) have been contaminated or deteriorated, are stored separate from other medications until destroyed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for seven (7) of 27 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #77, #106, #58, #86, #85, #53, and #11 Facility Census: #117. Findings included: On 05/09/23 at 1:15 PM a review of documentation for a thirty (30) day period from 04/10/23 through 05/09/23 showed incomplete or missing documentation for meal intakes for the four (4) residents presented below. For this time period, with three (3) meals per day, there were ninety (90) opportunities for documentation. a) Resident #77 On 05/09/23 a review of Resident #77's medical record found documentation for a thirty (30) day period from 04/10/23 through 05/09/23 showed incomplete or missing documentation for meal intakes. For this time period, with three (3) meals per day, there were ninety (90) opportunities for documentation. The following are the dates and entries missed for Resident #77: 04/10/23 missing two (2) entries 04/11/23 missing one (1) entry 04/13/23 missing one (1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and resident interviews, the facility failed to accurately explain the arbitration agreement to residents and/or their representatives. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. Census 117. a) Staff Interview On 05/10/23 at 11:05 AM, the Admissions Director (AD) #88 was asked to state to the survey team how she explained the arbitration agreement to new residents and/or their representatives. AD #88 stated, she most importantly explained to the residents the arbitration agreement was voluntary, meaning they do not have to sign it. AD #88 also stated she explained to the resident if they sign the agreement, they would have a third party arbitrator to help them settle the dispute, but if they could not settle this way, then they could have a judge and jury; an arbitrator was their first step before court. Surveyors explained when a resident signed the arbitration agreement they are waiving their right to have a judge and jury. AD #88 stated that was how she was taught to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an ongoing Quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility census: 117. Findings included: On 05/10/23 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator stated, QA [quality assurance] was not done last year, we didn't have any meetings. I just had the first one since I have been here last week. The Administrator provided a copy of the QA sign in sheet with a meeting date of 05/03/23. Record review showed no documentation of QAPI meetings for the past year other than the meeting held 05/03/23. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Center Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process, revised 10/24/22, showed the Quality Assessment and Assurance committee meets at least quarterly. .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee (QAPI) consisting of the minimum required members. The infection preventionist failed to attend the monthly QAPI meeting. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently residing at the facility. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) On 05/10/23 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator stated, QA [quality assurance] was not done last year, we didn't have any meetings. I just had the first one since I have been here last week. The Administrator provided surveyor with a copy of the QA sign in sheet with meeting date of 05/03/23. The Infection Preventionist (IP) did not attend the 05/03/23 meeting, as verified by the Administrator. The Administrator stated the IP was on vacation during the time of the meeting. Record review of the QA sign in sheets showed all required members were at the 05/03/23 meeting with the exception of the facility's IP. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Center Quality Assurance Performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide dignity during care for Resident #50. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for only Resident #50. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #50 On 05/10/23 at 9:00 AM, surveyor and Director of Nursing (DON) entered Resident #50's room. Nurse Aide (NA) #74 and NA #130 were giving Resident #50 a bed bath. The window blinds were open, and the resident was laying in bed completely nude, exposed to anything outside the window or adjacent rooms. The DON immediately stepped over and closed the blinds. As the Surveyor and DON left the room at 9:05 AM on 05/10/23, the DON was asked if dignity was provided while providing care to Resident #50? The DON replied, No it wasn't that is why I jumped over there and jerked the blinds closed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1)resident was provided a clean, sanitary homelike environment. The resident had dirty sheets his bed. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #11. Census 117. Findings included: a) Resident #11 On 05/08/23 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 sitting in his wheelchair in his room. The surveyor also observed the sheets on the resident's bed were covered in, what appeared to be, black dirt. The surveyor asked the resident if he was given showers on a regular basis and the resident responded yes, he gives himself a shower. The surveyor asked the resident if he changed his own bed linens too. The resident responded, no and said he had to have help. The surveyor asked how long it had been since they were changed. He said he was not sure but he would have them help change them sometime today. On 05/09/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor entered Resident #11's room and observed the same dirty sheets were still on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have an accurate MDS (Minimum Data Set) discharge for Resident #116. This was true for one (1) out of four (4) reviewed for the care area of discharges during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Resident # 116 A review of the nursing documentation found; Resident # 116 was discharged to home with family. The facility MDS states Resident # 116 was sent to an acute hospital. Further review of the record found the following nursing note dated 04/21/23: Note: resident discharged home via family car. Discharge paperwork, bed hold policy and mediations send with resident. All personal belongings sent with resident. On 05/10/23 at 10:38 AM, the Director of Nursing reviewed the Nursing note dated 04/21/23 and the MDS section A 1800. and agreed the MDS was coded wrong. I

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening (PAS) for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR (pre admission screening and resident review), during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier #85. Census 117. Findings Included: a) Resident #85 On 05/08/23 at 2:14 PM, a record review of Resident #85's electronic medical record (EMR), found the resident's most recent PAS, dated 03/29/21, indicated no level II was needed. It was also noted on this PAS the resident did not have any behaviors. This PAS was completed by a home health agency for his admission to the facility. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At the time of admission he had a diagnosis of Other Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder Unspecified, and Mild Intellectual Disabilities, none of which were indicated on section III, number 30 of the PAS dated 03/29/21. On 05/09/23 a copy of this PAS was provided to the surveyor by Corporate Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement the care plan for monitoring behaviors for Resident # 117 and failed to develop a care plan for Resident #41's bipolar disorder. This was true for two (2) out of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Resident #117 A review of the medical record for Resident #117 found the staff failed to implement the care plan to monitor behaviors for Resident #117. On the TAR (task administration record) the staff wrote yes for having a behavior. There were no other nurses notes describing the behavior observed. The care plan states the following: Focus: Resident is at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs. Goal: Residents will have the smallest most effective dose without side effects by next review. Interventions: Monitor changes in mental status and functional level and report to MD as indicated. Monitor for continued need of medication as related to behavior and mood. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and resident interviews, the facility failed to revise care plans to reflect the resident's preferences and meet the resident's needs for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the category of activities, during the long term care survey. Resident identifiers #11, #100, and #84. Census 117. Findings Included: a) Resident #11 On 05/08/23 during a resident interview the resident stated he doesn't go to activities because he doesn't like BINGO. A record review was conducted on 05/09/23 of the resident's Recreation Quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. It included, .List independent leisure pursuits: watching TV/movies independently and/or with other residents, resting, reading newspaper/daily chronicle, talking/visiting with office staff and other residents, going outside, smoking, collecting recipes .List the most frequently attended group programs: outings, music related programs, movies . Record review of the resident's activities care plan does not reflect the resident's preferences…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, resident observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents who are dependent on staff for carrying out thier Activities of Daily Living (ADL) recieve the necessary services to maintain good nutrtion, grooming, and personal hygiene. The was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of ADL care during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #424, #217, and #70. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #424 An observation of Resident #424 on 05/08/23 at 11:44 AM, found her hair was dishelved with part of it pulled up with a hair band on top of her head. The hair was coming out of the hair band and sticking up. It appeared her hair had not been combed recently. The resident was wearing an oversized sweat shirt which was dark blue at the bottom and light blue at the top. She was wearing a pair of dark pants. On 05/09/23 multiple observations of Resident #424 during the day beginning at 9:00 am and concluding at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. An accurate skin assessment was not completed for Resident #4. Appropriate action was not taken in a timely manner for an incident involving injury for Resident #50. These failed practices were a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #4 and Resident #50. Resident identifiers: #4, and #50. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #4 On 05/08/23 at 11:38 AM, Resident #4 was noted to have open skin areas with partial scabbing to her left forehead area. The Resident stated she told her daughter about it, and they probably should be putting something on it because they won't heal. Record review showed on 05/08/23 at 1:58 PM, a skin check was performed. No skin injury/wound(s) were noted on the Skin assessment done by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18. Record review showed on 05/01/23 at 6:17 AM a skin check was performed, and no skin injury/wound(s) were noted on the skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident weights were confirmed by a reweight when there was a 5 pound difference from the previously obtained weight. Failure to confirm the weights made it difficult for the dietician and other healthcare professionals to monitor Resident #82's nutritional status. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of nutritional status during the Long Term Care survey process . Resident Identifier: #82. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #82 A review of Residents #82's medical record on 05/08/23 found the following weights recorded: -- 04/13/23 95 pounds (Date of admission to facility) -- 04/18/23 98 pounds -- 04/26/23 109 pound this was an 11 pound gain -- 05/04/23 90 pounds this was a 19 pound loss. -- 05/09/23 99 pounds this was a 9 pound gain. During and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/10/23 at 6:07 PM, she confirmed if there is a 5 pound difference from the previous weight the staff should reweigh the resident to confirm the loss/or gain of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded timely to monthly drug regimen reviews. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #84. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #84 Record review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, showed: --The attending physician should address the consultant pharmacist's recommendation no later than their next scheduled visit to the facility to assess the resident. a) Resident #84 A medical record review for Resident #84 revealed monthly drug regimen reviews were not responded to by the physician timely. -02/15/23 Recommendation to evaluate continued use of a long-acting Potassium Chloride product, Potassium Chloride ER 10meg and Benztropine Mesylate 1 mg. This recommendation was not responded to until 03/29/23. -02/15/23 Recommendation to increase Atorvastatin or adding icosapent ethyl capsules 2 grams twice daily with food. This recommendation was not responded to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a residents drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identified: #117 Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Resident #117 A review of medical records for Resident #117 revealed the resident was ordered to receive Macrobid (antibiotic) one (1) tablet once a day for Prophylaxis. The order did not state what they were trying to prevent with this prophylactic medication. On 05/09/23 at 2:15 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the order. (Macrobid) Antibiotic used for Prophylaxis. The DON agreed the order should have included a Urinary Tract Infection. .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (a psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior.) This was true for One (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #117. Facility census 117. Findings included: a) Resident #117 A review of Resident #117's medical record on 05/10/23 found the resident was ordered to receive the psychotropic medication of Seroquel for hallucinations. During an interview on 05/10/23 at 10:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) agreed hallucinations were a symptoms of a disease and not a diagnosis of an illness. All psychotropic medications were required to have an appropriate diagnosis for their use. .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to employ a qualified dietitian and/or a certified dietary manager on a full-time basis. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 118. Findings include: Initial kitchen rounds were completed on 02/07/22 at 11:30 am, accompanied by Employee #126 who was introduced as the dietary manager. On 02/10/22 at 11:00 am, the facilities dietician, Employee #125 and Employee #127, Corporate Dietary Manager came to the room and informed this surveyor that Employee #126 is not a certified dietary manager and was not enrolled in a dietary manager program. Employee #126 was hired at the facility on 06/06/17. The dietician (#125) stated she was full time at the facility, and she stated, yes, I work 24 hours a week. This surveyor referred to the regulation which indicates, Full-time means working 35 or more hours a week. No further information was provided. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure [NAME] Virginia Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed correctly for three (3) of six (6) residents in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifier #51, #68 and #63. Facility Census 118 Findings included: a) Resident #51 A record review found the POST form dated [DATE] directed no CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) - Do not attempt resuscitation with limited additional interventions was not completed appropriately On [DATE] at 10:15 AM an interview with Social Worker (SW) #69 confirmed the POST form was not completed correctly due to missing information relating to the residents address, date of birth and social security number and the Guardian had not signed the POST form. The POST form contained only a verbal consent from the Guardian. On [DATE] at 12:10 PM a review of the Physician Determination of Capacity form dated [DATE] indicated the Resident does not have capacity. The Guardian court order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement there abuse prohibition policy in regards to reporting and the investigation of serious bodily injury. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident Identifier: #55. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: a) Policy Review A review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy with an effective date of 06/01/96 and a review and revision date of 04/09/21 on 02/09/22 found the following: --7. Immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect the CED (Center Executive Director) or designee will perform the following. --7.3 Report allegations to the appropriate state and local authority (s) involving neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (Including injuries of unknown source), suspected criminal activity, and misappropriation of patient property not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made if the event results in serious bodily injury. Serious bodily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides we competent to carry out the duties of their job. The facility had a total of 42 nursing assistants working at the facility. Of those 42 only four (4) had competency evaluations completed in the last year. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Staff Identifiers (All Nurse Aides): #44, # 23, #19, #84, #65, #98, #122 , #42, #33, #15, #46, #9, #39, #7, #24, #22, #4, #20, #79, #78, #60, #75, #83, #85, #86, #52, #68, #50, #49, #103, #118, and #95. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: a) NA Competencies On 02/08/22 at 11:22 am, the Center Nurse Executive (CNE) was asked to provide the competency check list which showed NA #36 and #98 possessed the competency to operate lifts successfully. On 02/08/22 at 1:35 pm the CNE stated they do not have any evidence to show NA #36 and NA #98 was evaluated for competency to operate the lift. At 3:00 pm on 02/08/22 all competencies for all NA's was provided to the survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident #43 received an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medications even though they had demonstrated no target behaviors to warrant the use of the PRN medication and the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering the PRN anti-anxiety medication. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during Long-Term Survey Process Survey (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #43. Facility census: 118. Findings include: a) Resident #43 A review of Resident #43's medical record found the following physician's orders for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg)- Give 1 tablet by mouth every four (4) hours as needed for anxiety. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April, May and June 2021 found Resident #43 was administered this medication on the following dates and times without evidence of non-pharmacological interventions before administration of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards and practices to maintain accurate and complete medical records. This was true for four (4) of 30 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: #60, #111, #37 and #112. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: a) Resident #60 A review of the medical record for Resident #60 was completed on 02/09/22. This review found a diagnosis list which contained a diagnosis of an unstageable pressure ulcer of left heel. This unstageable pressure ulcer diagnosis was not added until 01/04/22. At which time the onset date was listed as 01/04/22 and resolved date was added for 12/29/21. A progress note dated 12/29/21 by Registered Nurse (RN) #6 stated Wound rounds completed with NP (Nurse Practitioner), pressure area to left heel resolved. Sureprep treatment continues for preventive measures. [Typed as written.] The Skin Integrity Report dated December 2021 indicated the Deep Tissue Injury (DTI)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections including COVID - 19. Nurses failed to maintain infection control procedure during medication pass and the staff failed to dispose of COVID-19 contaminated gowns properly. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers #23 and #90 Facility Census 118 Findings Included: a) Medication Pass 1)Resident #23 On 02/08/22 at 8:20 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 110 shake a Sennosides-Docusate Sodium Tablet 8.6-50 MG from the bottle into her hand then place the pill into Resident #23's medication pill cup. LPN #110 then proceeded to take the medication cup to Resident #23 for administration. LPN #110 was asked after medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was provided care in a manner which preserved his dignity. Resident #93 was placed in a full body lift while in the hallway outside of his room. This was random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #93. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: An observation on 02/08/22 at 11:06 am found Nurse Aide (NA) #36 and NA #111 was in the process of transferring Resident #93 from the shower bed back to his bed. The nurse aides lifted Resident #93 up in the total lift from the shower bed while still in the hallway outside of his room. With Resident #93 still in the sling on the lift the nurse aides pushed the lift into resident #93's room to transfer him back to bed. An interview with NA # 36 at 11:18 am confirmed she and NA #111 placed Resident #93 in the lift and lifted him from the shower bed in the hall way. When asked why they did so instead of pushing him into his room and then transferring him she stated it is just to tight in there to get the shower bed in there. She stated, Was this a FUBAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by not providing a clean privacy curtain for Resident #68. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #68 Facility census: 118. Findings included: a) Resident #68 On 02/08/22 at 11:45 AM an observation of Resident #68's privacy curtain found the curtain was soiled with a brown dried matter. An immediate interview with Registered Nurse #73 confirmed the curtain required replacement. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all falls which resulted in serious bodily injury was reported to the appropriate state agencies within the required time frames. Resident #55 fell from bed and fractured her left hip. This was not reported within two (2) hours of the facility having knowledge of the fracture (serious bodily injury). This was true for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for the care area of falls during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #55. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: a) Resident #55 A review of Resident #55's medical record on 02/08/22 found the resident had a fall from bed on 11/16/21 which resulted in a fracture to her left hip. A review of the incident report related to this fall contained the following information: Root Cause/Conclusion: CNA (Nurse Aide) at bedside had asked resident, who could previously turn independently successfully, to turn to right side for linen change. Resident turned to right side underestimated the edge of the bed, and fell on right side of the bed onto the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to investigate a fall with a serious bodily injury to determine the cause and to initiate corrective action to prevent similar instances from happening again as required. This was true for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for the care area of accidents during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #55. Facility Census: 118. Findings included: a) Resident #55 A review of Resident #55's medical record on 02/08/22 found the resident had a fall from bed on 11/16/21 which resulted in a fracture to her left hip. A review of the incident report related to this fall contained the following information: Root Cause/Conclusion: CNA (Nurse Aide) at bedside had asked resident, who could previously turn independently successfully, to turn to right side for linen change. Resident turned to right side underestimated the edge of the bed, and fell on right side of the bed onto the floor. Further review of Resident #55's medical record on 02/07/22 found the following Minimum Data Sets (MDS) with the Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure transfer documents and appropriate information were communicated with the receiving health care facility. This was true for one (1) of three (3) Residents reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident Identifier # 111 Facility Census 118 Findings Included: a) Resident # 111 Record review found Resident # 111 was sent to the local hospital on [DATE] at 5:30 PM. A copy of the interact transfer form was provided to the local hospital on [DATE]. The reason for the transfer was behavioral reasons. On 02/08/22 at 1:32 PM, the Corporate Nurse (CN) stated the facility has a check list of items they send to the hospital but the facility doesn't keep a copy of each document sent with the resident to the hospital. The CN provided a copy of the check list with the Resident's name at the top of the check list. The checklist form did contain a place to check the current medication list and or current MAR (medication administration record), but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents are made aware of a facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to a hospital. This was true for one (1) of three (3) Residents reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident Identifier # 111 Facility Census 118 Findings Included: a) Resident # 111 A record review found Resident # 111 was sent to the local hospital on [DATE] at 5:30 PM. The reason for the transfer was behavioral reasons. A copy of the bed hold notice policy and authorization form shows the Resident's name printed on top of form and a registered nurse signature at the bottom of the page dated 10/17/21. The review found the rest of the form was not complete. On 02/08/22 at 1:15 PM, the Administrator acknowledged the bed hold paperwork was not filled out and they could not provide proof of what paperwork was sent with Resident # 111 on 10/21/21 at 5:30 PM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Sets (MDS)accurately reflected the resident's status. This was true for two (2) of thirty (30) resident's MDSs reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident #43's MDS was inaccurate in the area medication (gradual dose reduction (GDR)). Residents #112s MDS was inaccurate in area of nutritional/weight. Resident's identifiers: #43, and #112. Facility census: 118. Findings include: a) Resident #43 Review of Resident #43's physician's orders revealed she was receiving, Risperdal, an antipsychotic, for dementia. Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/09/21, Section N, Item N0410, A, Medications Received, stated the resident received antipsychotic medication seven (7) of the last seven (7) days. Section N, Item N0450, A, Antipsychotic Medication Review, stated the resident had received antipsychotic since the prior assessment. Section N, Item N0450, B, regarding whether a GDR was attempted was answered No. Due to Section N, Item NO450 C was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed. This was true for two (2) of 30 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #317 and #55. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: a) Resident #317 1) Smoking Status On 02/07/22 at 3:43 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) # 63 stated there are no current smokers except the one resident who is grandfathered in. Please note that Reisdent #317 is not resident allowed to smoke. On 02/08/22, a review of Resident #317's Care Plan dated 02/01/22 states resident may smoke independently. The Smoking assessment dated [DATE] states the resident may smoke independently as well. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section J1300 was coded as (0) which indicates no tobacco use. On 02/08/22 at 10:15 AM, Social Worker (SW) #69 verified the resident may not smoke independently due to facility being a non-smoking facility. SW #69 stated there was a mix up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #55's care plan pertaining to falls was revised when the residents condition changed. This was true for one (1) of 30 resident reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #55. Facility Census: 118. Findings Included: Observation of Resident #55 on 02/07/22 01:48 pm found she was a bilateral below the knee amputee. A record review of Resident #55's medical record on 02/08/22 found the following care plan. Focus Statement: Risk for further falls and injury related to recent fall with left hip fracture, new right BKA (Below the knee amputation). history of right trimalleolar fx (fracture), cardiac and narcotic medical use, impaired gait balance, incontinence, Dementia, very cluttered room (resident will not comply with keeping room uncluttered), incontinence, impaired vision, history of falls, including history of fall with ankle fracture and left hip fx, left BKA with prothesis use, and history of tib/fib fracture that occurred during transfer. This focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. For Resident #25, the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters for Midodrine, a medication to treat hypotension and Resident #107, had neurological checks, after a fall, which were incomplete. Resident identifiers: #25 and #107. Facility census: 118. Findings include: a) Resident #25 Review of Resident #25's medical records found an order for Midodrine 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth for treatment of orthostatic hypotension with meals three times daily. Hold of systolic blood pressure is greater than 150. Started on 11/18/21, which was the date of admission to the facility. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October, November, December 2021 and January and February 2022, found Resident #25's blood pressure (B/P) was taken once daily at 8:00 am. No blood pressures were taken at 12:00 pm and 5:00 pm prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an environment appropriate to prevent urinary tract infections and trauma by not having Resident #46's catheter tubing secureed to his leg. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents investigated for the care area of catheter care. Resident Identifier # 46 Facility Census 118. Findings Included: a) Resident # 46 On 02/08/22 at 3:00 PM, this surveyor observed Nursing Aide (NA) #38 complete catheter care on Resident # 46. During catheter care it was observed Resident # 46's catheter tubing was not secured to his leg . When NA #38 was asked what was used to secure Resident #46's catheter tubing, NA #38 stated the RN (Registered Nurse) was in charge of that. On 02/08/22 at 3:05 PM, RN #113, was asked if Resident # 46 should have a securing device on his catheter. RN # 113 stated she would have to ask. They do not routinely place them on. A review of the Facility Policy titled: Catheter: Indwelling Urinary-Care of with an effective date of 06/01/96 and a revision date of 06/01/21: Found the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to deliver respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #33, and #82. Facility census: 118 Findings included: a) Resident #33 Observation on 02/07/22 at 11:43 AM found Resident #33's oxygen tubing for her nasal canula was dated 01/27/22. This was confirmed with Registered Nurse (RN) #73 at 11:45 AM on 02/07/22. The Policy and Procedure states the oxygen tubing and storage containers for all respiratory supplies are to be changed weekly and dated on the change out date. b) Resident #82 Observation on 02/07/22 at 11:35 AM found Resident #82's oxygen tubing for her nasal canula was dated 01/27/22. This was confirmed with Registered Nurse (RN) #73 at 11:38 AM on 02/07/22. The Policy and Procedure states the oxygen tubing and storage containers for all respiratory supplies are to be changed weekly and dated on the change out date. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for Resident #39, who required hemodialysis due to end stage renal disease. The facility failed to assess the arteriovenous fistula in the left arm prior to and after receiving dialysis treatments and they obtained blood pressures (b/p) in the left arm eventhough it was a restricted limb. Resident identifier: #39. Facility census: 118. Findings include: a) Resident #39 Medical record review found Resident #39 was receiving hemodialysis via an arteriovenous fistula (A/V) in the left arm three (3) days a week, on Mondays, Wednesday, and Fridays, at an offsite Dialysis center. The facility was to complete the top half of the communication form, which included the resident's vital signs before the resident left the facility for dialysis, an examination of the access site (bruit/thrill) and any significant changes since last dialysis treatment. The dialysis center was to complete the middle section of the form which also included obtained vital signs, completed lab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME 1 of 5Sandia Ridge CenterAlbuquerque, NM

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SUNBRIDGE CARE ENTERPRISES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2002
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
REGENCY HEALTH SERVICES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
BISHOP, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
TOOTHMAN, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+23.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$991K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 7%Other / private 8%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $991K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,511per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515070. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next