No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

900 Tuck Street, Lebanon, PA 17042 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 159 certified beds · (717) 273-8595 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 273-8595 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1510 Cornwall Rd · (717) 454-0061 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
990 Isabel Dr · (717) 775-5108 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1301 Quentin Rd · (717) 450-7877 · Call to confirm hours
Park
CITY Park · (717) 272-7271 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1500 Quentin Rd · (717) 272-7741

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.9%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.8%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.1%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.1%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.7%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine34.3%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.4%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%9.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.481.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 225 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.2%CMS range 48.3–62.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.4–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting88.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge79.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.5–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
58.7%
Total nursing turnover
68.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 136.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-17)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Personal Hygiene, dated February 2, 2026, revealed that all staff must wear hair restraints to effectively keep hair from contacting exposed food. Observation during the lunch meal service tray line on April 15, 2026, from 11:30 a.m., to 12:03 p.m., revealed Dietary Employee (DE) 1 and DE 2 were observed working the meal tray line directly over uncovered food with mustaches that were not covered. The window frame above the shelf where a large mixer with an uncovered bowl, the Robot-coupe mixer, and a blender were stored had paint peeling off of it. The Robot-coupe mixer and blender were being used to prepare resident food at that time. The blind in this window frame had dried food debris along the length of it. There was another window frame above a storage rack of trays used for resident meals with paint peeling off of it. CFR 483.60(i) Food Safety RequirementPreviously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative(s) of transfer(s), and failed to notify a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, including the reasons for the moves, in writing upon transfer for six of six residents who were transferred out of the facility. (Residents 2, 7, 14, 42, 149, and 151) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was transferred to the hospital on December 26, 2025, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence to support that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided with written information regarding the transfer to the hospital and that the facility sent a copy of the transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 was transferred to the hospital on January 9, 2026, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that notification of the transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, resident group interview, a review of facility resident council meeting minutes and grievances, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to address grievances voiced by residents.Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Grievance Policy, last reviewed February 24, 2026, revealed that grievances may include a formal, written grievance process or a resident's verbalized complaint to facility staff. The facility was to acknowledge complaints/grievances and actively work toward resolution of the complaint/grievance.During a confidential group interview conducted on April 14, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., four of four residents reported that resident call bells were answered slowly, often taking more than 30 minutes. A review of resident council minutes dated from September 8, 2025, through December 11, 2025 revealed complaints of slow call bell responses on September 8, 2025, October 9, 2025, November 13, 2025, and December 11, 2025. No evidence was provided that resident council minutes were recorded in 2026.A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two of five nursing units. ([NAME] and [NAME] units)Findings include:Observations on April 13, 2026, from 10:01 a.m. through 1:10 p.m. and on April 16, 2026 from 9:40 a.m. through 12:00 p.m. revealed the following: The clear, plastic fire extinguisher cover in the hallway between rooms 135 & 137 was shattered. There were holes on left and right walls of the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER].The doorframe of the entrance to room [ROOM NUMBER] was dented and misshaped near the floor.There was a hole in the wall between the beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The wallboard at the bottom of the wall on the right of the entrance to the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was dented and crumbling. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(2.1) Management.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed to accurately reflect the current status of one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 139)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 139 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and a history of falling and required glasses to correct her vision. Resident 139's care plan revealed a problem with impaired vision and that the resident required glasses starting on March 8, 2022. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], incorrectly indicated in Section B (Hearing, Speech, and Vision) that the resident did not require corrective lens during the previous seven days. Observation on April 14, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., revealed that Resident 139 was wearing her glasses. In an interview on April 17, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that Resident 139's MDS assessment was inaccurate.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed the individual resident's needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 13) Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 13 had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data Set completed on February 20, 2026, indicated that the resident was alert and frequently incontinent of urine. The Care Area Assessment summary dated February 20, 2026, noted that the resident's urinary incontinence was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 13's urinary incontinence were included in the current care plan.In an interview on April 17, 2026, at 10:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documented evidence that the identified care area was addressed in the care plan.CFR 483.21(b)(1) Comprehensive Care PlansPreviously cited 3/26/25 and 2/4/2628 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain activities of daily living (showering) for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility March 12, 2026, with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, polyneuropathies (nerve damage), and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairment, required substantial assistance from staff for showers, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers. Review of facility documentation revealed that the resident was to receive a shower on Wednesdays and Saturdays on the evening shift. In an interview on April 14, 2026, at 11:47 a.m., Resident 1 stated, I haven't had a shower since I got here. Review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that Resident 1 received, was offered, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were implemented for three of 31 sampled residents. (Residents 4, 8, and 139) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. A physician's order dated November 25, 2025, ordered staff to inject eight units subcutaneously of a diabetic medication, Novolog Injection Solution 100 unit/milliliter (insulin) in the morning prior to breakfast. Staff were to hold the insulin if the resident's blood sugar was less than 80 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Review of Resident 4's April 2026 medication administration records (MAR) revealed that staff administered the medication three times in April when the resident's blood sugar was less than 80mg/dL. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure. A physician's ordered dated January 27, 2026, directed staff to weigh the resident every night shift and notify the physician if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review and clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for two of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 6, 96)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Pain Management, last reviewed February 24, 2026, revealed that staff would document non-pharmacological interventions (NPI's) and their effectiveness for patients receiving interventions for pain.Clinical record review revealed that Resident 6 had diagnoses that included left knee osteoarthritis, pain in the right hip, and diabetes. On March 17, 2026, the physician ordered for staff to document NPI's every shift. On April 6, 2026, the physician ordered staff to administer the narcotic pain medication, oxycodone, every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed that the resident received the as needed narcotic (oxycodone) without documented evidence that NPI's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate dialysis treatment for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 10).Findings include:A review of the policy, Dialysis: Hemodialysis External Catheter Evaluation and Maintenance, last reviewed February 24, 2026, revealed that facility staff were to avoid taking blood pressure from an arm with a dialysis access device. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 10 was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan initiated November 11, 2021, and last reviewed December 17, 2025, revealed that Resident 10 required ongoing hemodialysis. The care plan directed staff to monitor the fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that provides reliable vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess residents with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to render trauma informed care for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] , 2026, with diagnoses that included PTSD, depression, polyneuropathy (nerve damage), and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairment, required substantial assistance from staff for activities of daily living, and had a diagnosis of PTSD. There was no documentation to support that the resident was assessed for symptoms or triggers related to the diagnosis of PTSD. The care plan for Resident 1 did not include any measures to address the resident's history of trauma or identify triggers. There were no specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician acknowledged the pharmacist's recommendations for two of 31 sampled residents. (Residents 6 and 12)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that on March 20, 2026, the consultant pharmacist made recommendations regarding Resident 6's medication regimen. There was no documented evidence regarding the recommendation or that the attending physician had acknowledged or acted upon this recommendation. Clinical record review revealed that on October 20, 2025, and February 26, 2026, the consultant pharmacist made recommendations regarding Resident 12's medication regimen. There was no documented evidence regarding the recommendations or that the attending physician had acknowledged or acted upon these recommendations. In an interview on April 17, 2026, at 10:22 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documented evidence that the medication review recommendations for Residents 6 and 12 were addressed by the physician. 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee personnel and education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each nurse aide received 12 hours of in-service training annually, including training for dementia management, resident abuse prevention, and identified performance weaknesses for two of two nurse aides reviewed (NA 1 and NA 2).Findings include:Review of NA 1's personnel record revealed that the facility hired them on August 28, 2023.Review of facility training records dated April 17, 2025, to April 17, 2026, revealed that NA 1 completed only 31 minutes of in-service education in infection control and respirator use. Review of Employee NA 2's personnel record revealed that the facility hired them on December 19, 2023.Review of facility training records dated April 17, 2025, to April 17, 2026, revealed that NA 2 completed only 3 hours and 48 minutes of in-service education in safe resident handling, mechanical lift use, elopement prevention, and ethics. In an interview on April 17, 2026, at 12:59 p.m., the Director of Nursing and the Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation of potential neglect for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibitions, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that the facility prohibited abuse, mistreatment, neglect, and exploitation, for all residents. The facility was to implement abuse prohibition through the following, to include reporting of incidents, investigations, and the facility's response to the results of their investigations immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected neglect or abuse. The designee was to report the allegations involving neglect to the appropriate state and local authorities. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and venous insufficiency (leg veins become damaged or weak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and venous insufficiency (leg veins become damaged or weak preventing efficient blood return to the heart). The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was able to communicate her needs clearly and was dependent for activities of daily living (ADL), including bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident had an ADL self-care deficit and was dependent for ADL care in bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, and toileting related to limited mobility and interventions included assistance of two to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, review of facility documentation, and results of a test tray audit, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverages that were at an appetizing temperature on one of five nursing units. ([NAME] unit) Findings include: In an interview on May 27, 2028, at 10:43 a.m., Resident 1 stated that he had a hard time getting coffee that was not cold. Review of facility documentation entitled, Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray Evaluation, revealed that the coffee should be greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) at point of service to the resident. Results of a test tray audit conducted on May 27, 2025, at 12:27 p.m., after the last resident meal tray was served from the dining cart, revealed the coffee at a temperature of 128 degrees F. The previously mentioned beverage was noted to be below 140 degrees F. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Handling, dated February 24, 2025, revealed that staff were to label food items with the date prepared or opened and then discard after seven days after opening an item or three days after a food was prepared. Observations during the kitchen tour on March 23, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., revealed the following: In the walk-in cooler, there was an opened bag of shredded mozzarella that was dated March 10, 2025, and a pan of ham salad that was dated March 9, 2025. There was a pan of egg salad, a bag of lettuce, and a pan of raw pork cubes that were not dated. In the freezer, there was an opened bag of 20 sausage patties that was not dated. In an interview on March 23, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., the Dietary Manager confirmed that the previously mentioned items should have been dated and were not and the expired items should have been removed. CFR 483.60(i) Food Safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform infection surveillance in accordance with facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Infection Control Outcome and Process Surveillance and Reporting, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that the Infection Preventionist would conduct regular surveillance related to infections. During the review of the facility infection control program on March 26, 2025, there was no documented evidence of any infection surveillance since January 2025. In an interview on March 26, 2025, at 10:54 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that infection surveillance should be done monthly and was not done per facility policy since January 2025. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on March 23, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., the Dietary Manager stated the facility did not employ a certified dietary manager. In an interview conducted on March 25, 2025, at 12:05 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was not a full-time dietitian employed onsite at the facility and that the facility did not employ a qualified certified dietary manager in the absence of a full-time dietitian. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was answered in a timely manner for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 16) In addition, the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 47) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 16 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and chronic pain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff with transfers and mobility, and was able to make his needs known. Review of Resident 16's care plan revealed that staff were to provide assistance with transfers and toileting. Observation on March 24, 2025, at 10:23 a.m., revealed the resident was observed out of bed sitting in the wheelchair with the call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care from staff as she preferred in order to attend activities of her choice for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 4) Findings include: In an interview on March 24, 2025, at 10:40 a.m., Resident 4 expressed a concern that she was not able to attend her preferred morning group activites last Monday and Tuesday due to the staff not getting her up and ready in time to go to the activities held in the morning. She was concerned because staff had not helped her to get up and ready until after 11:00 a.m She further stated that she had told staff that she preferred to be up out of bed and dressed for breakfast and morning activites by 7:00 a.m She stated that did not like to miss the activities and interacting with her peers. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and osteoarthritis of the knee. The Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 51 and 141) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment summary dated December 11, 2024, noted that the resident's cognitive decline/dementia was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 51's cognitive decline/dementia were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 141 had diagnoses that included a deep tissue injury on her right heel. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had an injury on her foot. The MDS Care Assessment Area dated March 6, 2025, noted that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a restorative ambulation program as recommended by physical therapy for one of one sampled resident who was recommended for a restorative ambulation program. (Resident 94) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 94 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, and abnormal gait and mobility. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and had limited range of motion on one side of her upper and lower extremities. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance with activities of daily living related to having impaired balance. On February 19, 2025, there was an intervention for staff to implement and deliver restorative nursing programs as indicated which included ambulation with a walker. Review of an physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for five of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 37, 51, 119, 141, 355) In addition, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for a compression stocking and a compression wrap for one of one sampled resident. (Resident 355) Findings include: Review of the policy entitled, Medication Administration, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that staff were to administer medications in accordance with the written orders of the physician. Vital signs were to be entered into the Medication Administration Record (MAR) as indicated. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included heart failure. On February 2, 2025, a physician ordered that staff obtain a daily weight for the resident. A review of Resident 37's record revealed that there was no documented evidence to support a weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline and/or improve range of motion for one of five sampled residents at risk for limited range of motion. (Resident 101) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 101 had diagnoses that included dementia, a right knee contracture, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and dressing. On June 1, 2023, the physician ordered for staff to apply a splint to Resident 101's right lower extremity in the morning. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for loss of range of motion related to contractures with an intervention for staff to apply the right lower extremity splint in the morning. Observations on March 23, 2025, at 11:50 a.m., and 1:50 p.m., March 24, 2025, at 9:09 a.m., and 10:49 a.m., and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate catheter care was provided for one of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. (Resident 44) In addition, the facility failed to assess bladder incontinence and provide services to restore bladder function as much as possible for one of two sampled residents at risk for bladder function loss. (Resident 144) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Catheter: Indwelling Urinary - Care of, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that staff would perform catheter care twice a day and as needed and document the care provided. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 44 had diagnoses that included dementia and urinary retention. On September 5, 2024, the physician ordered for the resident to have an indwelling catheter every shift. Observations on March 23, 2025, revealed Resident 44 in his wheelchair with his indwelling catheter in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications/biologicals were securely stored in a medication or treatment cart on one of six nursing units. ([NAME] nursing unit) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Medication Storage, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that the medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medication and that medication rooms, cabinets and supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. Observations on March 24, 2025, on the [NAME] nursing unit, from 10:30 a.m. through 11:35 a.m., revealed the medication cart in the hallway with two tubes of medicated creams (Permetherin) on top, unattended and accessible to anyone in the vicinity. Observations from 11:55 a.m. through 12:28 p.m., revealed the treatment cart, with medicated creams (lidocaine), wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served preferred food items on their meal trays for three of 29 residents. (Residents 94, 96 and 118) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 94 had diagnoses that included diabetes and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented. A review of a care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for altered nutrition due to her medical diagnoses. There was an intervention for staff to honor her food preferences within her meal plan. In an interview on March 23, 2025, at 12:25 p.m., Resident 94 stated that she often did not get certain preferred food and drink items that were listed on her tray card. At that time, she was served her lunch in her room. Review of the tray card revealed that she was to receive pickles with her sandwich. She did not receive pickles as listed on her tray card. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement an antibiotic stewardship program and maintain a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for one of two residents receiving antibiotics. (Resident 355) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that medical providers were to document antibiotic orders containing dose, duration, and indication for use. Front-line nursing staff (RNs and LPNs) were to perform a time-out on all antibiotics when a resident was admitted to the center. The Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly medication regimen review would review antibiotic courses for appropriateness of administration and/or indication and monitor provider compliance with proper documentation of antibiotic orders-dose, duration, and indication. The Infection Preventionist would track antibiotic starts through the use of line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer pneumococcal disease vaccines in accordance with facility policy to five of 29 residents whose vaccines were reviewed. (Residents 41, 51, 56, 80, 137) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Pneumococcal Vaccination, last reviewed February 24, 2025, revealed that upon admission, the facility would assess each resident to determine if they had been previously vaccinated for pneumococcal disease and offer the vaccine if the resident had not received it. Staff were to document education, including benefit of vaccination, and whether resident received the vaccination or declined in the electronic medical record. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence that the facility offered a pneumococcal disease vaccine or determined if the resident had received it prior to admission. Clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the baseline care plan summary was provided to the resident or representative for three of six sampled residents. (Residents 2, 3, 4) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Person-Centered Care Plan, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that a baseline plan of care was to be developed within 48 hours of admission. The baseline care plan was to include healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident and must include initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy orders, social services, and pre-admission screening resident review, if applicable. The baseline care plan was to be updated as needed to meet the resident's needs until the comprehensive care plan was developed. The resident and/or representative were to be provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review the care plan within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment for three of six sampled residents. (Residents 1, 5, 6) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal), heart failure, and diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed on November 3, 2024. There was a lack of documentation to support that the facility had conducted an interdisciplinary care plan meeting to review the care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included heart failure and diabetes. The Quarterly MDS assessment was completed on November 20, 2024. There was a lack of documentation to support that the facility had conducted an interdisciplinary care plan meeting to review the care plan. Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's order were implemented for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal), heart failure, and diabetes. A physician's order dated December 4, 2024, directed staff to administer morphine ER (pain medication) twice a day. Nursing documentation dated December 5, 2024, revealed the pharmacy did not have morphine available. On December 9, 2024, the physician ordered oxycodone HCl ER (a medication for severe pain) every 12 hours-discontinue when morphine ER arrives, as a temporary replacement for morphine. Review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record revealed that staff did not administer the oxycodone HCl ER on [DATE], at 9:00 p.m. In addition, upon receiving the morphine ER on [DATE], staff did not discontinue the oxycodone HCl ER. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner respectful of each resident's dignity and preferences to promote the quality of life for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Safe Resident Handling Program, last reviewed July 25, 2024, revealed that the facility was to maintain a safe care environment for residents. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure. On November 14, 2023, Resident 1 was admitted to hospice care. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was not cognitively impaired and required staff assistance for bed mobility. Review of the nursing notes revealed that on July 30, 2024, the hospice nurse and the resident requested a draw sheet placed beneath her for repositioning in bed due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed July 25, 2024, revealed that injuries of unknown origin would be investigated to determine if abuse or neglect was suspected. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was not cognitively impaired and needed staff assistance for bed mobility. On August 16, 2024, a nurse noted that the resident had a bruise on top of her right forearm that measured 5 centimeters (cm) long by 5 cm wide. Review of the facility incident investigation revealed that a 5 cm by 5 cm bruise was observed on top of the resident's right forearm just above her wrist. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for seven of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 5, 27, 46, 90, 105, 115, and 135) Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility RAI (federally mandated assessment tool), dated October 2023, User's Manual which provided instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments, revealed that significant change in status assessments, quarterly assessments, and admission assessments were to be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) which refers to the last day of the assessment observation period. Clinical record review on April 10, 2024, revealed that Resident 5 had a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], that was still in progress and had not yet been completed as per the time requirements. Clinical record review on April 10, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for five of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 27, 34, 44, 63, 76) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, last reviewed March 28, 2024, revealed staff were to obtain vital signs if necessary, and document necessary medication administration information. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 27 had diagnoses that included hypertension and congestive heart failure. On July 15, 2023, a physician ordered staff to administer medication (amlodipine besylate) one time a day for hypertension (high blood pressure). Staff were not to administer the medication if the residents's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was less than 100 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). Review of Resident 27's March and April 2024 medication administration records (MARs) revealed that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner on two of three resident nourishment rooms. ([NAME] and [NAME]) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Brought in for Residents, dated March 28, 2024, revealed that foods stored in the refrigerator must be labeled with the resident's name and date the food was brought in and were to be discarded by staff after three days. Observation of the [NAME] resident nourishment room on April 11, 2024, at 10:55 a.m., revealed, in the freezer, there were three napkins and an opened gelato container not labeled or dated. In the refrigerator drawer, there was a container of opened sour cream with a use-by date of May 2, 2023. There was a package of opened cheese slices, a soda cup, an opened water bottle, a sandwich, a container of soup, a container of pasta, and an opened package of red grapes that were not labeled or dated. There were two containers of rice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for three of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 28, 63, 90) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that section P of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 28 used a chair that prevents rising less than daily during the seven-day review period. Review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed that Resident 28 was not ordered and did not use a chair that prevents rising during the seven-day review period, as inaccurately identified on the MDS assessment. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 63 had fallen in her room on December 31, 2023. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], inaccurately reflected that Resident 63 did not fall since the prior assessment dated [DATE]. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 90 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's, dysphagia, and protein-calorie malnutrition. On June 6, 2022, the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan and interventions to meet each residents' needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included stroke, seizures, and kidney failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required assistance with activities of daily living for self-care and/or mobility activities and was on an antidepressant medication (citalopram). The Care Area Assessment for this MDS triggered functional ability and psychotropic drug use as problem areas requiring a care plan. Resident 1's current care plan did not include interventions to address functional ability and psychotropic drug use. In an interview on April 12, 2024, at 12:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no care plan developed to address Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality as defined by the PA Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 145) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Central Vascular Access Device Dressing Change, dated March 28, 2024, revealed that staff was to perform sterile dressing changes using standard aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT) at least weekly. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 145 had diagnoses of anemia, osteomyelitis (bone infection), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In an interview on April 9, 2024, Resident 145 stated that staff had not changed the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing in almost two weeks. Observations on April 9, 2024, at 1:36 p.m., through April 11, 2024, at 9:45 a.m., revealed Resident 145 with a right upper arm PICC with the dressing dated March 29, 2024. Title 49, Professional and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and document the status of wounds for three of seven sampled residents with wounds. (Residents 17, 46, 145) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Skin Integrity and Wound Management, last reviewed March 28, 2024, revealed that staff was to evaluate and document wound status weekly. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease. Review of the nursing notes and current care plan revealed that the resident was being treated for multiple wounds of the pubis and right lower quadrant (abdomen). Review of Resident 17's skin and wound evaluation records revealed that there was no documented evidence that staff assessed the resident's wounds after March 6, 2024. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 145) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 145 had diagnoses that included anemia, osteomyelitis, and PTSD. On March 21, 2024, a physician noted that the resident had a diagnosis of PTSD, was recommended for an increase in sertraline (an antidepressant that can be used to treat PTSD), and was seen by a psychiatrist at the VA (Veterans Affairs). In an interview on April 9, 2024, at 1:07 p.m., Resident 145 reported daily thoughts about traumatic experiences in Vietnam, which had a continued negative affect. Observation on April 10, 2024, at 10:50 a.m., revealed that Resident 145 was physically shaking, hearing noises, and hallucinating. Resident 145 stated it was a flashback from Vietnam. There was no assessment completed or care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician acknowledged the pharmacist's recommendations for two of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 63, 115) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that on March 4, 2024, the consultant pharmacist made recommendations regarding Resident 63's medication regimen. There was no documented evidence regarding the recommendations or that the attending physician had acknowledged or acted upon these recommendations. Clinical record review revealed that on December 20, 2023, and March 5, 2024, the consultant pharmacist recommended that the physician consider decreasing Resident 115's psychotropic medications. There was no documentation that the attending physician had acknowledged or acted upon these recommendations. In an interview on April 12, 2024, at 12:15 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the medication review recommendations were not addressed by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1)(3)(4) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered medication as prescribed by the physician for three of six sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, enlarged prostate, and stroke. On December 8, 2023, the physician ordered staff to administer amitriptyline, clopidogrel bisulfate, pravastatin sodium, tamsulosin, famotidine, and sodium bicarbonate daily. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2023, revealed that the medications were not administered to the resident on December 9, 2023. Review of the MAR for January and February 2024, revealed that amitriptyline was not administered on January 10 and 27, 2024, and February 13, 2024. The tamsulosin was not administered on January 27, 2024. Review of nursing documentation revealed that the medications had not been delivered from the pharmacy. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation, resident interview, results of a test tray audit, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature on one of five nursing units. ([NAME] unit) Findings include: Review of Resident Council Minutes from October 17, 2024, November 14, , 2024, January 9, 2025, and February 13, 2025, revealed that residents had stated that their food was served cold and was not palatable. In a group interview on March 24, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., Residents 4, 47, 54, 55, and 100 reported that it was an ongoing problem that hot food was frequently served cold and food was not palatable. Review of facility documentation entitled, Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray Evaluation, the vegetable, starch, and coffee should be greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) at point of service to the resident. Results of a test tray audit conducted on March 24, 2025, at 12:06 p.m., after the last resident meal tray was served from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-04-12 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative(s) of transfer and the reasons for the move in writing for seven of seven sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 1, 15, 17, 44, 46, 87, 115 ) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], and March 4, 2024, after changes in condition. There was no evidence that the resident's responsible party was provided with written information regarding the resident's transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no evidence that the resident's responsible party was provided with written information regarding the resident's transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-12 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident, responsible party, or legal representative at the time of transfer for six of seven sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 1, 15, 17, 46, 87, 115) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], and March 4, 2024, after changes in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident, resident's responsible party, or legal representatives were provided written information about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident, resident's responsible party, or legal representatives were provided written information about the facility's bed-hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME 1 of 5Sandia Ridge CenterAlbuquerque, NM

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/15/2020
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/15/2022
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
ROSS, TARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 8%Other / private 18%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$340per resident / day
operating cost
$10,328per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395472. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next