Creekside Center
9107 N. Davis Road, Stockton, CA 95209 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (209) 478-6488 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.7% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.83 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.79 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 275 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.0%CMS range 49.0–60.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 9.4–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 64.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 85.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.9–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 71.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.451 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided according to professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when, 1. Resident 1's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP- a medical device attached to a facemask and then placed over the resident's mouth or nose and used to deliver pressurized air into the airway to keep it open) order was not transcribed from the [ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL NAME]'s discharge orders on 5/24/26 to Resident 1's active orders at the facility upon admission on [DATE]. 2. Resident 1 was given Resident 2's medications by mistake on 6/6/26. These joint failures put Resident 1's health and safety at risk when Resident 1 developed an altered level of consciousness (a state of confusion) due to impaired gas exchange (a condition where the lungs struggle to transfer oxygen into the bloodstream and remove carbon dioxide) after she had not received CPAP treatment for 14 days (delayed care), which resulted in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment in a timely manner for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's stage 2 pressure ulcers (localized skin and tissue injuries caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shear, primarily develop over bony prominences like the tailbone, heels, and hips, stage 2 is a partial-thickness skin loss) at right buttocks and left buttocks merged and worsened to stage 3 pressure ulcer (a severe wound featuring full-thickness skin loss where subcutaneous fat is visible, but muscle, tendon) at coccyx and a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA- an assessment which captures a major decline or improvement in a resident's condition) was not completed .This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for not receiving the necessary services indicated for Resident 1's current condition upon change in status and had the potential to worsen Resident 1's wound and health condition.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review with the MDSC (A Minimum Data Set Coordinator is a specialized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed accurately for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when:1. Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized, federally mandated clinical assessment tool used in nursing homes to evaluate a resident's overall health, functional capabilities, and care needs) assessment inaccurately reflected Resident 1 without pressure ulcer (localized skin and tissue injuries caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shear, primarily develop over bony prominences like the tailbone, heels, and hips) upon admission to the facility,2. Resident 1's admission nursing assessment did not accurately reflect Resident 1's skin integrity, and3. Resident 1's weekly nursing assessments did not reflect Resident 1's skin condition accurately.These failures resulted in delayed wound care treatment and worsening of Resident 1's pressure ulcers.Findings:1. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section I - Active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent and/or heal pressure injuries (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for too long) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when:1a. Resident 1 did not have any treatment orders for his stage 2 pressure ulcers on his left and right buttock for 10 days from 5/25/24 to 6/4/24,b. Low air loss (or LAL, a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds that uses a continuous, gentle flow of air through a surface of tiny holes to reduce pressure helping to prevent and treat skin breakdown and pressure wounds) mattress was not ordered timely for Resident 1, c. Resident 1's care plan interventions of turning and repositioning and wound care treatments for pressure ulcer healing were not implemented consistently,d. Resident 1 was not seen by a wound specialist for 13 days from 6/6/24 till 6/20/24, e. IDT meetings (Interdisciplinary Team meeting: a collaborative gathering of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for G-tube feeding (method of providing nutrients via a tube directly into the stomach or intestine when a person is unable to eat by mouth) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's G-tube (gastrostomy tube - a medical device inserted directly through the abdomen into the stomach) dressing was not changed for more than a month.This failure had the potential for Resident 1's G-tube site to develop an infection and/or sepsis (life-threatening reaction to an infection that causes immune system to harm healthy tissues and organs).Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 had multiple diagnoses including but not limited to, gastrostomy status (presence of a surgical opening in the abdomen that leads directly into the stomach).During a concurrent interview and record review, on 5/8/26, at 8:19 AM, Resident 1's progress note dated 10/28/24 was reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The progress note indicated Resident 1 had large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 73 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. Dishware not kept according to standard; 2. Food preparation equipment not kept clean per food safety standards; 3. Food items not properly labeled and/or stored and; 4. Staff unfamiliar with correct sanitizing process. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/26, during the initial kitchen tour at 8:20 a.m., with the CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) in the kitchen, four (4) out of twelve (12) coffee mugs were found scratched on the inside surface. The CDM confirmed this finding and stated the mugs should have been replaced. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/26, during the initial kitchen tour at 9:37 a.m., with the CDM in the kitchen, two (2) frying pans were found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (a dynamic, individualized, and multidisciplinary document outlining a resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial needs) for 2 out of 20 sampled residents when:1. A care plan for the use of psychotropic medication (mind altering medication) was not developed for Resident 8.2. The care plan interventions for an indwelling suprapubic catheter were not followed for Resident 47.These failures had the potential to place Resident 8 for not receiving effective and person-centered care, and Resident 47 at increased risk for infection. Overall, these could negatively impact the health, safety, and well-being of Residents 8 and 47. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 8's diagnosis included depression (mental depression with feeling of sadness), anxiety disorder (persistent or excessive worrying that interferes with daily life), post-traumatic stress disorder (or PTSD a mental condition triggered by experiencing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare meals adequately when; 1.Meals prepared were bland and lacked flavor for 4 out of 73 residents (Resident 18, Resident 49, Resident 55 and Resident 64), and 2. Pureed foods (a smooth, thick, pudding-like consistency created by blending, mashing, or straining food, requiring no chewing) were not prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance when recipes were not followed, and water was used to thin the prepared foods. These failures had the potential for malnutrition, weight loss, impaired wound healing, and increased susceptibility to disease. Findings: 1. During an interview on 3/17/26 at 2:22 p.m. with Resident 55, Resident 55 stated the food tasted bad. Resident 55 was noted to have multiple outside food items and beverages on the bedside table. Resident 55 stated that his family brought in food because the facility food was not appetizing. During an interview on 3/18/26 at 8:30 a.m. with Resident 49, Resident 49 stated the food was not up to her expectations,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 73, when:1. Resident 47's suprapubic catheter (a thin, flexible tube surgically inserted through the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine. Potential complications include infections such as urinary tract infection [UTI, a common infection caused by bacteria entering the bladder, or kidneys]) drainage bag was observed positioned on the floor; 2. Staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene during medication administration for Resident 4, Resident 23, Resident 42, Resident 58, and Resident 77; and,3. Staff failed to follow infection control protocols when nutritional drinks were transferred from one resident's room to another.These failures in infection prevention and control practices had the potential to contribute to the spread of infection among residents and staff within the facility.Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 47's diagnosis included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and document an informed consent (a signed document requires healthcare providers to disclose risks, benefits, alternatives to ensure patients make educated decisions about their care or medication use) for increasing the diazepam (a mental health drug used to treat anxiety) dosage in one out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 8) that were reviewed for unnecessary drug use based on facility's policy on resident's rights.This failure had the potential to violate Resident 8's right to be aware of the consequences (risks versus benefits) of higher drug dosage usage that could contribute to adverse effects including dizziness, excessive sedation, fall risk and bone fracture.Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 8's diagnosis included depression (mental depression with feeling of sadness), anxiety disorder (persistent or excessive worrying that interferes with daily life), post-traumatic stress disorder (or PTSD a mental condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to one of six residents (Resident 1) who receive nutrition, fluids, and medications through a gastrostomy tube (GT- also referred to as an enteral feeding/tube feeding- a tube inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications when swallowing is not possible or safe) when Resident 1's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG tube-a tube inserted through the skin and abdominal wall directly into the stomach for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medications) placement was not checked before medication administration.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 developing infection and even death.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, dated 3/19/26, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs, arms and legs, and the torso), cerebral palsy (a brain disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to promote healing and prevent pressure injury (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue because of prolonged pressure) for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 3), when Resident 3's low-air loss mattress (LAL mattress, a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds that uses a continuous, gentle flow of air through a surface of tiny holes to reduce pressure helping to prevent and treat skin breakdown and pressure wounds) was not correctly calibrated according to her current weight.This deficient practice had the potential to delay wound healing and place Resident 3 at increased risk for developing pressure injury and/or skin breakdown.Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including morbid obesity (a serious, chronic disease defined as significant excess weight that could increase the risk, or cause of serious illness), and muscle weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely medication processing and administration when there was a delay in both processing and administration of a prescribed mental health medication for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 8's health and place him at increased risk for a decline in psychological status.Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 8's diagnosis included depression (mental depression with feeling of sadness), anxiety disorder (persistent or excessive worrying that interferes with daily life), post-traumatic stress disorder (or PTSD a mental condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a traumatic events with flashbacks and nightmares), and Lewy bodies dementia (a type of memory loss with hallucinations and fluctuating alertness). The record additionally indicated that Resident 8 was a responsible party (being fully accountable for own health care decisions). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and report to the Department, an allegation of financial abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 reported that his money was missing from his wallet after seeing a staff member holding his wallet.This failure resulted in a delay of the Department's investigation into Resident 1's allegation of theft and had the potential to affect other residents of the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated that he was admitted in the Summer of 2022.A review of Resident 1's MDS [Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status], dated 10/31/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15 (BIMS, a standardized 0-15 point cognitive assessment used primarily upon admission to long-term care facilities to gauge mental acuity, with higher scores indicating better cognition) which indicated Resident 1's cognition (the mental process of knowing and understanding) was intact.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents or hazards for two of four sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4) when:Resident 3 did not have Wander Gard device (a wearable device that tracks movement and triggers automated security responses when a resident nears a restricted area) placement and functioning checks documented every shift daily per physician order after an elopement (when a resident leaves a healthcare facility against medical advice when doing so poses an imminent threat to the resident's health or safety) episode; andResident 4 did not have a Wander Gard device placed upon admission to the facility despite a recent history of elopement and according to facility policy.These failures put Resident 3 at increased risk of elopement and resulted in Resident 4 eloping (leaving the facility without staff knowledge) on 10/6/25, with the potential to lead to severe harm like falls, a serious injury, and/or deathFindings:1. A review of Resident 3's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 3 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate in accordance with professional standards for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4's Visual Checks (a document detailing staff observations of Resident 4's activity in timed increments), dated 10/06/25 indicated that Resident 4 was in the facility during the time that he had eloped from the facility.This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation in Resident 4's medical record for twenty minutes, with staff documenting safety observations that they did not perform.Findings:A review of Resident 4's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life).A review of Resident 4's SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation, a healthcare communication tool] Communication Form and Progress Note, dated 10/6/25 indicated, .the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY These findings represent past non compliance with this regulatory requirement. There was significant evidence the facility corrected the non compliance as of 08/15/25 and there were no other occurrences of the same deficient practice at the time of the survey. The facility was in substantial compliance with this regulatory requirement and there for doesn't not require a plan of correction. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive water safety management program based on nationally accepted standards to minimize the risk of Legionella Disease (a type of pneumonia (lung infection) caused by the bacteria Legionella pneumophila) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (a microorganism (bacteria) that exists in water sources or plumbing (pipes required for the water supply, heating, and sanitation in a building) systems that can cause serious illness in people over [AGE] years of age and have weakened immune systems) for a census of 71 when:a. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment to ensure residents' needs related to nursing services were met for a census of 72 when only one scheduled nurse worked the entire night shift on 5/4/25. This failure had the potential for residents' care services not being met by nursing staff and could affect the health and well-being of all residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 5/8/25, at 2:58 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 stated that in emergency situations such as a code blue (a medical emergency requiring urgent medical help) a nursing shortage could lead to placing residents' safety and well-being at risk. During a phone interview on 5/8/25, at 3:54 p.m., LN 2 confirmed there was one nurse for the entire night shift on 5/4/25. LN 2 stated that it was not a safe practice to have one nurse for the entire facility if a resident had a medical emergency. LN 2 further stated that this unsafe practice could possibly affect residents' safety. During an interview on 5/9/25, at 6:15 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate treatment and services were provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when, Resident 1 was not transferred to an acute care hospital (provides short-term treatment for illnesses, injuries, or surgeries that require immediate medical attention) in a timely manner for further evaluation after Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall with a head injury on 2/17/25 and Resident 1 had a fall again on 2/28/25 with noted pain to Resident 1 ' s left hip. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for delayed treatment and services that could possibly result in a decline in health and well-being. Findings: On 2/24/25, the Department received a complaint report that Resident 1 was not transferred after a fall on 2/17/25 to the acute care hospital for further evaluation till the following day. On 3/4/25, the Department received an additional complaint report that Resident 1 was not transferred after a fall on 2/28/25 to the acute care hospital for further evaluation until the following day. Review of Resident 1 '…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1) Clean food service items were found put away wet (e.g. trays, steam table pans, scoops, and blender); 2) Can opener, food processor, and large saucepan were found dirty and/or rusted; 3) Raw chicken was prepared on a metal rack that had an uncovered container of dessert cups underneath; 4) Three bags in the freezer were open to the environment (sausage patties, biscuits, and mixed vegetables); 5) Staff were unable to demonstrate/explain the testing of sanitation concentration for the dish machine and red buckets/manual dish washing); and, 6) Resident refrigerator contained multiple food items with no name and/or date; and nursing staff were uncertain of how to label food brought in from outside, as well as where to reheat. These failures had the potential to lead to food borne illness for the 62 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1) During the initial kitchen tour on 12/3/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to puree (blend foods to smooth consistency) foods using methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor when excessive fluid was added, necessitating the addition of thickener. This failure had the potential of leading to poor intake, nutrient deficiencies, and weight loss for the 4 out of 62 residents eating facility prepared pureed meals. Findings: During a kitchen visit on 12/4/24 at 10:52 a.m., [NAME] (Ck) 1 was preparing the lunch meal. Ck 1 stated she had four residents on a pureed diet but would prepare five servings to add a buffer. Ck 1 placed five meatloaf servings in the food processor bowl and blended for approximately three seconds. She repeated blending for a few more seconds as the texture wasn't smooth enough. Ck 1 then added an unmeasured amount of broth and blended again for a few seconds, repeating this process several more times. After the fourth time of adding broth, Ck 1 found the meatloaf was runny and added a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide alternative meal options of similar protein content to the meal entrée when grilled cheese and peanut butter and jelly (PB&J) sandwiches were provided in place of the entree. This had the potential of leading to decreased protein intake for those choosing these alternatives. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 12/3/24 at 8:25 a.m., the alternative menu was observed hanging outside of the kitchen. This menu included Grilled Cheese and other sandwiches. During the lunch meal plating on 12/4/24 starting at 12:15 p.m., sandwiches such as grilled cheese and PB&J were provided on some meal trays due to resident request. These meals included the other side items from the lunch meal, but no additional source of protein. During an interview on 12/5/24 at 1:05 p.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD concurred that some residents did receive sandwiches for their entrée without an additional source of protein. Review of facility provided grilled cheese sandwich recipe indicated that it provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 16) was treated with dignity and respect when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stood over Resident 16 while assisting with feeding. This failure had the potential to impact Resident 16's self-esteem and negatively affect dining experience. Findings: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition where the stomach acid back flows towards the throat). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 required partial to moderate assistance with feeding. During an observation on 12/4/24 at 12:44 PM, CNA 1 was observed standing on the right side of Resident 16 while feeding Resident 16 lunch. CNA 1 stood throughout the entire meal. During an interview on 12/4/24 at 12:58 PM, CNA1 stated standing was the only choice due to a chair not being available. During a concurrent interview and record review 12/6/24 at 10:05 AM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality for 2 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 60 and Resident 179) when, 1. The physician was not notified when vital signs were outside of ordered parameters for Resident 60; and, 2. The physician was not notified timely of abnormal lab results for Resident 179. These failures had the potential for unsafe medication use and risk of adverse effects for Resident 60, and the potential for a delay in treatment for Resident 179. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 60's admission Record indicated Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (failure of the kidneys to function normally), dependance on renal dialysis (a type of treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when your kidneys are unable to), and congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices for a census of 67 residents when: 1. Urinals (a urine collection container) were not labeled and stored in a sanitary manner; 2. Two resident wash basins were stored on the floor in the bathroom, one was not labeled, and contained a soiled cloth; and, 3. Intramuscular Muscular Injection (an injection deep in the muscles) reconstitution (adding liquid to dry medication) was not properly handled; These failures increased the risk of infectious diseases for residents in the facility. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, on 12/3/24, at 9:32 AM, there were two urinals in a resident bathroom. One was not labeled with a name or room number and was upside down top of the toilet above the flushing handle. The other was placed on the assistive handrail next to the toilet. CNA 1 stated the urinal should be labeled and stated the location of both containers placed the residents at risk of an infection and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate treatment and services were provided for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when, a. Resident 1 needed to be suctioned (secretions from the mouth and throat are removed with a device for individuals who are not able to swallow or clear their own secretions) and the suction machine was not present at his bedside; and, b. Resident 1's change in condition was not assessed and reported to the physician in a timely manner. These failures placed Resident 1 at risk for aspirating (when liquid or solids are inhaled and may cause breathing difficulty and pneumonia), and his condition to be unrecognized and untreated. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (irreversible kidney failure), Dysphagia (trouble swallowing) following a stroke, and Hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). A review of Resident 1 ' s Physician Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) needs were accommodated promptly, when Resident 1's call light was not within her reach. This failure had the potential of Resident 1's needs not being met and to cause psychosocial and/or physical harm for Resident 1 when Resident 1 was unable to contact staff for assistance if needed. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with multiple diagnoses including unsteadiness, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's admission assessment titled, Nursing Documentation Evaluation dated 2/3/24, indicated, .Fall Risk indicators Identified .ABLE TO MAKE NEEDS KNOWN .1 PERSON ASSIST WITH ADLS [Activities of Daily Living] .CALL LIGHT WITHIN REACH, INSTRUCTED TO CALL FOR ASSISTANCE . Review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation record dated 2/4/24, indicated, .Pt. [Patient] noted on floor next to bed with back resting on side of bed. Pt. stated took brief off due to had an incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from verbal abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 told Resident 1, I could kill you. This failure resulted in verbal abuse and potential psychological harm for Resident 1. Findings: Review of a facility reported incident received on 1/28/24, indicated, .RESIDENTS . [Resident 1] .Alleged Perpetrator . [CNA 1] . Date of Alleged Event: 01/26/2024 .Resident reported to nurse that on Friday, CNA made statement, I could kill you and nobody would know. Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with multiple diagnoses including anxiety disorder, heart failure, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 1/18/24, indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (The assessment uses a points system that ranges from 0 to 15 points, 0 to 7 points suggests severe cognitive impairment. 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to report an abuse allegation for one of three residents (Resident 1), when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 witnessed CNA 1 telling Resident 1 that she could kill him on 1/26/24 . This failure resulted in delayed immediate protection of Resident 1 and a delayed investigation of the alleged abuse and placed other residents in the facility at risk of abuse. Findings: Review of a facility reported incident received on 1/28/24 at 5:31 p.m., indicated, .RESIDENTS . [Resident 1] .Alleged Perpetrator . [CNA 1] . Date of Alleged Event: 01/26/2024 .Resident reported to nurse that on Friday, CNA made statement, I could kill you and nobody would know. Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with multiple diagnoses including anxiety disorder, heart failure, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 1/18/24, indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 2) of three sampled residents was free from abuse when Resident 1 hit Resident 2 with Resident 1 ' s fist causing ecchymosis (a bruise, with skin discoloration from damaged, leaking blood vessels underneath the skin) in Resident 2 ' s left eye. This failure resulted in Resident 2 not free from abuse by Resident 1. Findings: A review of an admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in late 2018 with multiple diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder which makes a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and acts accordingly), psychosis (seeing or hearing things that other people cannot see or hear). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/18/23, indicated Resident 1 had very mild memory problems. A review of Resident 1 ' s care plan (CP) dated 6/17/21, 2/1/21, and 1/8/24 respectively, indicated, Resident has a tendency to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update comprehensive care plans to include bed rail recommendations for 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #31) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for bed rail usage. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a revision date of March 2022, revealed, The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. A review of Resident #26's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/22/2021 with diagnoses that included aphasia (a comprehension and communication disorder) following a cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic kidney disease, dementia, and schizophrenia. A review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/05/2023, revealed Resident #26 had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain consents and physician's orders for the use of bed rails for 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #31) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for bed rail usage. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised in August 2022, revealed, The use of bed rails or side rails (including temporarily raising the side rails for episodic use during care) is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent. Per the policy Before using bed rails for any reason, the staff shall inform the resident or representative about the benefits and potential hazards associated with bed rails and obtain informed consent. The following information will be included in the consent: a. The assessed medical needs that will be addressed with the use of bed rails; b. The resident's risks from the use of bed rails and how these will be mitigated; c.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a timely urine specimen for urinalysis for 1 (Resident #54) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol, revised in November 2018, indicated, 1. The physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. Review of Resident #54's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/31/2023, with diagnoses that included unspecified cirrhosis of the liver and left clavicle fracture. Review of Resident #54's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/03/2023, revealed Resident #54 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and was always continent of bowel and bladder function. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccination for 1 (Resident #37) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised in October 2019, revealed, All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. The policy specified, Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per our facility's physician-approved pneumococcal vaccination protocol. Review of Resident #37's admission Record revealed the facility most recently admitted the resident on 05/12/2022, with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/09/2023, revealed Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a Pneumococcal Vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines in the United States, the facility failed to provide a COVID-19 vaccination for 2 (Resident #37 and Resident #16) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)- Vaccination of Residents, revised in June 2022, revealed, Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. The policy specified, 15. Booster vaccine doses are provided in accordance with current CDC guidance and 19. If a resident requests vaccination, but missed earlier opportunities for any reason, the vaccine will be offered to that resident as soon as possible. Efforts to help the resident obtain vaccination are documented. Review of CDC guidance titled, Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines in the United States,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility documents review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was treated with dignity and respect when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) stated, You know how to pee on the toilet. You need to pee on the toilet. I don't know why you are peeing in your diaper. You're going to have a pissy bed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to feel emotional distress. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cirrhosis of liver (liver damage from a variety of causes leading to scarring and liver failure), difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's Nursing Documentation Evaluation, dated 11/22/23, indicated Resident 1 was alert and orientated to time, place, and person. The evaluation documented Resident 1 had clear speech, no behavioral issues and was Spanish speaking only. During a review of Facility Reported Event, dated 11/15/23, indicated Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 reported, that offensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection prevention and control measures were practiced for a census of 71, when, 1. Staff donned (put on) an N95 (type of mask that offers the highest level of respiratory protection) on top of a surgical facemask (does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures), 2. Staff did not don a faceshield/goggles before entering a COVID room (in which COVID positive residents reside for isolation), and 3. Staff did not change an N95 between the care of a resident in a COVID room and non-COVID room. These failures had the potential to spread COVID-19 infection among residents and staff which could cause serious illness and/or even death. Findings: During an observation on 10/10/23, at 10:52 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated a COVID positive resident was on isolation precautions (separated from others and measures taken to prevent the spread…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to promote healing and prevent pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue because of pressure) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when an air mattress was not provided to Resident 2 as ordered. This failure had the potential to worsen the pressure ulcer and to develop new pressure ulcers for Resident 2. Findings: Review of an admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with multiple diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition (not consuming enough calories), malignant neoplasm of liver (liver cancer), muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS: a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated 9/20/23, indicated Resident 2 had moderately impaired cognition, had a pressure ulcer and was at risk of developing new pressure ulcers. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BQ OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2021 |
| BOLD QUAIL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2020 |
| NEWGEN LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2020 |
| ROBIN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| TRESS, AVROHOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| SHAW, PAMELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| 9107 NORTH DAVIS ROAD PROPERTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| BQ REALTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $662K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555387. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.