No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Ownership rollup across 38 nursing homes in 1 state: California. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.2 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 1.0 stars below the ~3.2 average of its state. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It is improving: across the same 38 homes rated throughout, the average rose 0.16 stars between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

38
Homes in this chain
4,420
Certified beds116 per home on average
93%
Occupied4,114 residents a day across 4,420 beds
+0.16
Star changeacross the 38 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
1
State covered
2.2
Average CMS rating~3.2 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.1 of 538 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing3.3 of 538 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures3.3 of 538 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

13 with immediate-jeopardy citations3 Special-Focus candidates3 with an abuse flag21 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$54.7M
Related-party expensesummed across 38 homes · FY2023–2024 cost reports
10%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 38 homes reporting both figures
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 38 homes with a cost report
$1.1M
Total federal fines21 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 67%Medicare 12%Other / private 22%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 38 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5
Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy SFF candidate Abuse flag $31,803 fined
California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5
Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5
Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $140,904 fined
Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 54 immediate-jeopardy $212,749 fined
Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $27,425 fined
Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5
Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5
Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5
Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 53 immediate-jeopardy SFF candidate $202,260 fined
Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5SFF candidate $45,604 fined
West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $39,511 fined
Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5
Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $36,090 fined
Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $10,361 fined
Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $29,228 fined
Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $47,972 fined
Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $56,394 fined
Highland Springs Care CenterBeaumont, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $77,191 fined
Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterNorwalk, CA 2 of 5$20,654 fined
Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5$24,465 fined
Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5
Santa Fe LodgeEl Monte, CA 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 2 of 5
Green Acres Healthcare CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5$57,016 fined
Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5
Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5
Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte, CA 3 of 5
Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5
San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5
Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5$16,146 fined
View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5$28,106 fined
Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5$8,278 fined
Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5
Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 4 of 5$9,032 fined
Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5
Pico Rivera Healthcare CenterPico Rivera, CA 5 of 5$26,588 fined
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.