Burlington Convalescent Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

27.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 116.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise/update fall care plan to include updated interventions after the fall on 12/28/2024 to prevent a repeat fall for one of two residents (Resident 165) who was a high risk for fall. As a result, on 2/3/25, Resident 165 fell again and suffered severe pain of 7 (seven) out of 10 (7/10 - a numerical pain scale assessment tool where zero is no pain and 10 is severe pain) to the buttocks and to the left and right thighs. On 2/5/2025, the facility transferred Resident 165 to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 via non-emergency medical transportation where Resident 165 was diagnosed with a left hip fracture (broken bone). On 2/16/25, GACH 1 performed an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF - a type of surgery used to stabilize and repair broken bones, using screws, plates, sutures, or rods to hold the bone together and for healing) on Resident 165. Findings: During a record review, Resident 165's admission Record indicated the facility admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding a significant change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who refused to continue dialysis (treatment to clean one's blood by removing waste and extra fluid when the kidneys are unable to) treatment and verbalized a desire to die.This failure resulted in delayed physician evaluation, psychiatric intervention, and implementation of medically necessary treatment and safety measures.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 5/21/2026 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD- Condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for regular course of long-term dialysis or kidney transplant to maintain life) requiring dialysis and depression (a mood disorder that may cause persistent sadness or loss of interest in activities).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to address diagnosis of depression (a mood disorder that may cause persistent sadness or loss of interest in activities), refusal of treatment, and non-pharmacological interventions for mood and behavioral symptoms.This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for worsening depression, psychosocial decline, nutritional compromise, and lack of appropriate mental health interventions.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 5/21/2026 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD- Condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for regular course of long-term dialysis or kidney transplant to maintain life) requiring dialysis and depression.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one of three residents (Resident 1) by failing to obtain timely psychiatric evaluation and intervention for Resident 1 exhibiting depression (a mood disorder that may cause persistent sadness or loss of interest in activities), refusal of dialysis (treatment to clean one's blood by removing waste and extra fluid when the kidneys are unable to), and verbalizations indicating a desire to die.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening mental health status, self-neglect, decline in medical condition, and avoidable harm.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 5/21/2026 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD- Condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for regular course of long-term dialysis or kidney transplant to maintain life) requiring dialysis and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff labeled all foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer with the correct food name, date of food delivery, date the food container was opened, and best by date. This deficient practice of not correctly labeling all foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer had the potential for residents who consume food from the kitchen to suffer from foodborne illnesses (refer to illnesses such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and hospitalization Findings: During an observation in the kitchen on 5/11/2026 at 7:55 AM, several food items and drinks in the refrigerator and freezer were not labeled as follows:Iceberg lettuceClear drinks (appeared to be water)CilantroFrozen food in red color in dessert cups (unable to identify what it is)White colored drinks (appeared to be milk). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/11/2026 at 8:12 AM with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS - manages daily food service operations, ensuring safe, nutritious,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two out of two residents (Resident 5 and Resident 45) did not sign Advanced Directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor). Resident 5 and Resident 45 had severe cognitive (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living) impairment. This deficient practice violated Resident 5 and Resident 45's rights with the potential to cause conflict with the residents healthcare wishes.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/10/2018 with diagnoses that included but not limited to cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to securely store and dispose off personal health identifiable (PHI - any health-related data that can directly or indirectly trace back to a specific individual) information was stored securely and disposed after admission from a general acute care hospital (GACH) visit for one of one (Resident 129). The deficient practice had the potential to result in a breach protected PHI and medical identity theft, targeted financial fraud, and alterations to personal medical records for Resident 129's. Findings: A review of Resident 129's admission record indicated Resident 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease (severe phase of kidney (organ that filters bodily waste) disease where your kidneys permanently lose about 85 percent (%- unit of measurement) to 90% of their function, leaving them unable to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), fracture (crack or break in one of the bones) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for one out of one resident (Resident 110). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 110 to experience low self esteem and not appreciated. Findings: During a review of Resident 110's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/25/2026 with diagnoses that included but not limited to schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 110's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 3/5/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 110 had moderate cognitive (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 110 needed partial/moderate staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL- including upper body assist and personal hygiene, set up/cleaning assistance for eating and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided an accurate medical concern description to an optometrist (OPT - a primary healthcare professional who specializes in eye and vision care) when Resident 101's eyeglasses were missing for of one of four residents' (Resident 101) . This deficient practice resulted in Resident 101 complaining that without his eyeglasses, his eyes would get wet, it was very hard to see or do anything, he could not read and loves to read. Findings: During a review of Resident 101's admission record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: hypercapnia (a condition where there is an abnormally high level of carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), hypercalcemia (a condition where the calcium level in your blood is abnormally high that can lead to weakened bones, kidney stones, and severe heart or neurological complications if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise and monitor and immediately attend to residents' meal carts to ensure that one of one sample resident (Resident 54) did not access meal carts that had left over foods and drinks. Resident 54 has a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). This deficient practice placed Resident 54 at increased risk for aspiration (accidentally inhaling food or liquids which can lead to infection), hospitalization, and death.Findings: During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/2/2026 with diagnoses that included but not limited to severe protein-calorie malnutrition (potentially life-threatening condition caused by an inadequate intake of protein, calories and other macronutrients) and dysphagia.During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 4/2/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 54 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 54 needed partial/moderate assistance for activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medication prescribed for two out of eight sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 64) from the medication cart (is a mobile workstation used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense medicines, medical equipment, and supplies). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the administration of expired medications to residentsFindings: A review of Resident 6's admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included: Hypertension (high or raised blood pressure), Acute Kidney Failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), and Depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident screening tool) dated 4/23/2026, indicated Resident 6's cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

21 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA