Casa Bonita Convalescent Hospital
535 E Bonita Avenue, San Dimas, CA 91773 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (909) 599-1248 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.32 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.0%CMS range 30.8–61.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.7–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.4–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 97.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a fall (unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, or lower level) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, by failing to:1. Implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan of care for Resident 1.2. Monitor Resident 1's response to fall prevention interventions. 3. Assess the causative factors of Resident 1's multiple falls per Resident 1's Care Plan (CP, a form where one can summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments).As a result, on 9/3/2025 at 9:45 AM, Resident 1 fell onto the floor mat on the right side of the bed. Resident 1 sustained a fracture (a break or crack in a bone) in the subtrochanteric left femur extending into the less trochanter (near the left hip and upper part of the thigh bone), and a nondisplaced fracture through the right intertrochanteric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress (LAL - pressure reducing mattress) was placed at the correct setting for two of two sampled residents (Resident 86 and Resident 32). This deficiency had the potential to place Resident 86 and 32 at increased risk of developing pressure injuries. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 86's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 86 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty) and encephalopathy (disease or disorder of the brain, characterized. During a review of Resident 86's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 3/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 86 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information) and was dependent (helper does all of the effort) on staff for toileting and rolling from left lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship program (promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 87) to monitor the use of antibiotics for unnecessary or inappropriate use and ensure protocols were in place to reduce the risk of adverse events, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms. For Resident 87's swelling of the tooth and for Resident 21's vaginal discharge, the proper antibiotic screening forms were not used to accurately determine if the residents met the criteria of a true infection. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to develop antibiotic -resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 21 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia (loss of intellectual function) and generalized weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 68 and Resident 31), were treated with dignity while eating. Resident 68, who had limited mobility, did not have a clothing protector, while having breakfast in bed. For Resident 31, Treatment Nurse 1 remained standing and did not position themselves at the resident's eye level while assisting with the lunch meal. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 68 having food and drink spillage on Resident 68 causing potential feelings of humiliation and embarrassment. For Resident 31, there was a potential feeling of disconnection and dominance or authority from the staff during the feeding process. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 68's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 2), was provided care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to conduct an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of healthcare professionals from various disciplines who collaborate, assess, coordinate, and manage each resident's comprehensive health care, including his or her medical, psychological, social, and functional needs) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when Resident 2 had continuous episodes of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 2 developing serious health complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including encounter for attention to gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 87) was free from a significant medication error. Facility staff opened a specially formulated (how the drug is prepared and put together to make it into a usable medicine that can be taken) antibiotic capsule which disrupted the time-release (when the medicine is designed to release small amounts of the drug into your body over a long period, rather than all at once) mechanism of the medication. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 87 receiving the medication in a manner that altered its intended pharmacokinetics (what your body does to a drug after you take it), potentially impacting its therapeutic effectiveness and increasing the risk of adverse effects. Findings: During a review of Resident 87's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 87 on 1/15/2025, with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain its infection prevention and control program for one of five sampled residents (Resident 59) by failing to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) when handling soiled linens under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-extra measures, like wearing gowns and gloves, used during high-contact care activities with residents who are at a higher risk of having or spreading germs that are hard to treat, like multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 59 on 12/25/2021, with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, to maintain and implement its Infection Control Program to prevent the transmission of disease and infection for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), by placing another resident's (unidentified) dentures in Resident 1's mouth. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infection to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/5/2024 with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 10/28/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired in cognitive skills (ability to make daily decisions). The MDS indicated Resident 1 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of nine sampled residents (Residents 41,30, 25, and 53) and/or their legal representatives (RP) were informed and/or provided written information about Advance Directives (AD, legal document that provides instructions regarding medical care according to the resident's wishes and only goes into effect if the resident can no longer communicate their wishes). This failure had the potential to result in lack of knowledge regarding care and treatment decision making for Residents 41, 30, 25, and 53. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with daily activities) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (disorder causing elevated sugar level in the blood). The AR indicated Resident 41 had Responsible Party 1 (RP 1) as the emergency contact. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments of the disease diagnoses, health conditions, and/or medications, were complete and accurate, for two of two sampled residents (Residents 27 & 20). This failure had the potential to result in a decline in the residents' physical and psychosocial well-being due to inaccurate or inconsistent plan of care. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 27 on 5/7/2021 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with daily activities), Parkinsonism (brain conditions that cause slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors), and major depressive disorder (depression, mental disorder with persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities that interfere with daily life]). During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/6/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 27 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided for three of three sampled Residents (Resident 36, 25 and 252) by failing to ensure: A.Resident 36's head of bed (HOB) was elevated to at least 30 - 45 degrees while receiving g-tube (GT, gastrostomy tube; a type of tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) feedings as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Enteral Feeding- Safety Precautions. B - C.Residents 25 and 252, who were receiving enteral feeding (nutrition taken through the mouth or through a tube that goes directly to the stomach or small intestine) received appropriate care and services by failing to respond timely to the GT pump that was continuously beeping (alarming). These failures had the potential to result in GT complications and harm to Residents 36, 25 and 252, additionally, there was a potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (Residents 11, 20, & 96) did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications used to treat mental health disorders that alter neurotransmitters [transmit messages from neurons to muscles] in the brain, affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) by failing to: A. Monitor the side effects upon administration of Resident 11's duloxetine (psychotropic drug used to treat major depressive disorder [depression, mental disorder with persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities that interfere with daily life]. B. Provide a documented rationale for the continuation of Resident 20's as needed (PRN) Ativan (generic name lorazepam, psychotropic medication to treat anxiety [excessive and persistent feelings of worry, fear, dread, and uneasiness that interfere with daily life]) physician orders. C. Ensure Resident 96's order for PRN Lorazepam (psychotropic medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure three of four sampled glasses of milk/mocha mix were served at 40 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit used to measure temperature) or lower as indicated in the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the residents' taste by serving unfresh or spoiled milk/mocha mix to the residents. Findings: During an observation with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Kitchen Aid 1 (KA 1), in the facility kitchen, on 5/29/2024 at 12:27 PM, several 8 ounces of glasses of milk were on the trays ready to be served with the residents' lunch. Three of the four glasses of milk were randomly selected and observed to have a temperature higher than 41F. The first glass measured at 42 F, the third glass measured at 44 F and the fourth glass measured at 51 F. During an interview with KA 1, on 5/29/2024 at 12:29 PM, KA 1 stated the milk temperature should be below 41 F because above 41F is the danger zone (the temperature range between 40F and 140F in which bacteria can grow rapidly) and the residents could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care plans (CP) related to risk of side effects of medication use for Depakote (medication used to control seizures, a sudden uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain) and a CP related to Resident 2's allergies were developed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 2) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to not receive the necessary care and services to achieve their optimal level of functioning. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (disease that occurs when a person's blood sugar is too high), generalized anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread and uneasiness) and bipolar disorder (serious mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 96) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 did not utilize a communication board when attempting to communicate with Resident 96 as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Accommodation of Needs Related to Communication. This failure had the potential to result in unmet needs to Resident 96. Findings: During a review of Resident 96's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with severe dementia (a group of conditions, decline in mental ability, that interfere with daily activities) with agitation, hypertension (high blood pressure), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). During a review of Resident 96's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 4/22/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 96 was severely impaired with cognitive skills (ability to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30), to reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcer-injuries [PU/PI, localized injury to the skin and or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as result of pressure or pressure in combination with shear (mechanical force that cause the skin to break off) and/or friction (movement of one surface of the skin against the other]) by failing to: follow the facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P), titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries, Pressure Sore Management, and the, Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] Job Description, for Resident 30, who was on a low air loss (LAL, a mattress designed to distribute body weight and prevent and treat pressure wounds) mattress and who was at high risk for developing PIs. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a physical decline and the development of PIs to Resident 30. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 41), who had limited range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint), received the necessary rehabilitation services to maintain or prevent further decline in ROM by failing to follow up on the Occupational Therapist 2's (OT 2's, healthcare professional who involves the use of daily activities [occupations] to treat the physical, mental, and emotional ailments that impact a resident's ability perform daily tasks) recommendation to obtain an OT evaluation/treatment order on 5/30/2022. This failure had the potential to cause further decline in ROM with worsening contractures (deformity and joint stiffness) to both upper extremities (arms), which could lead to increased pain to Resident 41. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR 1), AR 1 indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 on 9/29/2020 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with daily activities), osteoarthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 61) received proper respiratory (relating to breathing) care such as oxygen (02 [a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential for living]) therapy to meet Resident 61's needs and in accordance with the physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 61 receiving 02 therapy at a lower level and had the potential to result in compromised respiratory status (the movement of air in and out of the lungs and exchange of carbon dioxide [a colorless, odorless gas] and 02 at the alveolar level [alveoli, the functional units of the lung with the overall task to warrant gas exchange, i.e., 02 supply and carbon dioxide removal from the body]) to Resident 61. Findings: During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including respiratory failure, unspecified with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 49) was administered an eye drop medication properly in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for Resident 49 to not receive the full benefits of the eye drop medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 49 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including ventricular fibrillation (a life-threatening heart rhythm that results in a rapid, inadequate heartbeat), tracheostomy (a surgically created hole [stoma] in your windpipe [trachea] that provides an alternative airway for breathing) status, and gastrostomy (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube, often referred to as G-Tube [GT] through the belly that brings nutrition and/or medications directly to the stomach). During a review of Resident 49's Care Plan (CP) titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities in the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR, thorough evaluation a resident's medication regimen) was identified for one of one sampled resident (Resident 11) who was on psychotropic medications (used to treat mental health disorders, alter neurotransmitters [transmit messages from neurons to muscles] in the brain). The facility's Consultant Pharmacist (FCP) failed to identify and report inadequate monitoring of duloxetine (psychotropic medication used to treat depression [a mental disorder with persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities that interferes with daily life] during the MRR done on 5/14/2024 to 5/15/2024. This failure had the potential to cause a decline Resident 11's physical and psychosocial well-being related to the administration of unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 11' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 11 on 4/27/2024 with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a snack to one of one sampled resident (Resident 48) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Frequency of Meals. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 48 to be hungry and to negatively affect his feeling of well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with spinal stenosis (the spaces in the spine narrow and create pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots), post laminectomy syndrome (a condition in which the patient continues to feel pain after undergoing a laminectomy [back surgery] or another form of back surgery), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic [long standing] condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 5/6/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 48 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as indicated in the facility's policy when one of one sampled Registered Dietician (RD 1) did not wear a beard cover, while working in the kitchen food preparation area. This deficient practices had the potential for the RD's beard/facial hair to fall into the residents food and contaminate the residents' food. Findings: During an observation in the facility kitchen, on 5/29/2024 from 11:49 AM to 12:44 PM, the Registered Dietician (RD), who had visible beard, was observed walking around the kitchen while the residents' lunch was being prepared. The RD walked from the cold drinks preparation area to the food assembly tray line that served food to the residents. The RD did not wear a beard cover. The RD wore a surgical mask. The RD's beard was uncovered from the mid of the RD's left and right cheeks to the RD's ear. The RD's goatee beard (a small, pointed beard) was protruding under the RD's chin, outside of the RD's surgical mask. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices and implement interventions to prevent and control the spread of infections in the facility for one of five sampled residents (Resident 41) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) on Enhanced Standard Precautions (ESP, approach for preventing the transmission on Multidrug-Resistant Organisms [MDROs, germs resistant to many antibiotics] in skilled nursing facilities [SNFs]). This failure had the potential to result in the increased spread of infections throughout the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR 1), AR 1 indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 on 9/29/2020 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with daily activities), type 2 diabetes mellitus (disorder causing elevated sugar level in the blood), and presence of gastrostomy (surgical opening into the stomach for the introduction of food). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) after the resident was cleared by the GACH to return to the facility on 5/13/2024, according to the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the denial of Resident 1's rights to return to the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular (relating to the brain and its blood vessels) disease affecting left dominant side, respiratory failure (when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the repositioning (turning) schedule for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be at risk for worsening skin condition and/or pressure injury (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 1 to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure (a condition in which the lungs were not able to release enough oxygen into the blood), dependence on ventilator (a machine to support or replace the breathing of a person who was ill or injured), type 2 diabetes mellitus (characterized by high levels of blood sugar in the blood) with foot ulcer (an open sore or wound), and pressure induced deep tissue damage (area of intact skin that looks purple or dark red due to damage to tissues under the skin) of right and left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-16 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and electronically transmit the Discharge Resident Assessment timely to Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system for three of three sampled residents (Residents 2, 3 and 4). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the facility's quality monitoring data at transition points, such as when residents enter or leave the nursing home. This also had the potential for residents not to be reassessed accurately and receive the necessary care if and when readmitted to the facility. Findings: a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection ( presence of bacteria in the bladder, urethra, ureter and kidney) and the resident was discharged to home on 7/22/2021. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) a resident assessment and care screening tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss Mattress (LALM, a mattress that has small air holes in its top surface which continually blow out air causing the patient to float which reduces skin pressure at the mattress surface) were set at the correct setting for four of four sampled residents (Resident 65, 70, 84, and 85). a. Resident 65's LAL mattress pump was set to level four instead of the correct setting of level three. b. Resident 70's LAL mattress pump was set on a level of seven instead of the correct setting of level two. b. Resident 84's LAL mattress was set to firm instead of setting of three. c. Resident 85's LAL mattress was set to setting three instead of setting two. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for developing pressure injuries (PI, injuries to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Findings: a. A review of Resident 65's admission Record indicated Resident 65 was originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide four of five sampled residents (Resident 5, 57, 65, and 74) with contractures (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff, this prevents normal movement of a joint or other body part), the appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM, how far a person can move or stretch a part of the body, such as a joint or a muscle). a. For Resident 5, the facility did not provide ROM exercises, and did not apply splints (a firm material used for supporting and immobilizing a broken bone), to both of the resident's hands and right elbow. b. For Resident 57, the facility staff did not apply a hand splint to the resident's left hand. c. For Resident 74, the facility staff failed to apply left elbow splint. d. For Resident 65, the facility staff failed to provide ROM exercises. This failure had the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and interventions for two of two sampled residents (Resident 40 and 85) with indwelling urinary catheters (a flexible tube that is put through the urinary opening and into the bladder used to drain urine into a drainage bag, a small balloon filled with sterile water is placed inside the bladder to hold the catheter in place). This failure led to the presence of sediment (particles that may be indicative of an infection), in the urinary catheter which can lead to a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system). Findings: a. A review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated Resident 40 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 40's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (a condition that develops over a long period of time in which the lungs have a problem getting gases, such as oxygen and carbon dioxide, in and out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three of three staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 2, 3, and 4) assigned to perform Range of Motion exercises (ROM, activity aimed at improving movement of a specific joint, a point where two bones make contact), apply splint (a supportive device that protects a broken bone or injury to help with pain and promote healing), and apply hand roll (a roll used for patients with contracted hands) placement to residents with limited ROM were trained, assessed and evaluated for adequate competency. This deficient practice had the potential to result for the residents not to received the appropriate ROM exercises, as ordered by the physician that could result in injury or decline in the residents's conditions. Cross reference to F688 Findings: During an interview on 12/15/2021 at 3 pm, the DSD stated Licensed Nurses performed the ROM, applied hand roll and splints if the Rehabilitation Nurse Assistant (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents maintain their function and joint mobility) were not available to perform the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow safe food storage and food handling practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to: 1. Store dishware covered and/or inverted. 2. Discard old fresh produce food items stored in the kitchen's refrigerator. 3. Practice appropriate hand hygiene and glove use when necessary before handling food in the kitchen. 4. Store non-food items away from food items in the pantry. 5. Label opened/used food item stored on the shelf above the prep counter in the kitchen. These deficient practices could result in a risk for serious complications from food borne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverage) and/or affect the palatability of the meal to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/13/2021, at 9:25 am, with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the initial brief tour of the kitchen, the open dishware storage rack located by the entrance of the kitchen was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure by failing to: a. Perform surveillance (closed observation) and monitoring (observe and check the progress or quality of work over a period of time to keep under systematic review), of the staff's non-compliance or compliance with proper hand washing, donning (put on), doffing (remove) personal protective equipment (PPE) such as the gown, goggles, gloves and face mask and other infection control practices to identify the possible cause(s) of the residents facility's acquired infections (an infection that was not present prior to the admission to the facility) from September 2021 to November 2021 such as: 1. Urinary tract infection (infection in the bladder, ureter, urethra and kidney). 2. cellulitis (skin infection) 3. Pneumonia (severe infection in the lungs) b. Ensure Resident 23's resident's nasal cannula tubing (a device used to deliver oxygen to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 19 sampled residents (Resident 64, Resident 81, Resident 246) were provided a safe and sanitary environment by failing to store resident care equipment/supply properly in accordance with the facility policy. This failure could result in the spread of disease-causing organisms from residents to residents. Findings: a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 64 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted last on 4/7/2020 with multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a problem getting gases in and out of the blood), tracheostomy status (a tube inserted in the windpipe for breathing), multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), functional quadriplegia (complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (an adult onset characterized by high levels of sugar in the blood). A review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, resident specific plan of care for two of 19 sampled residents (Residents 26 and 76). a. Resident 76 did not have a plan of care for contact isolation (is the state of being in a place or situation that is separate from others) for Clostridium difficile (C-diff a bacterium that causes an infection of the large intestine [colon]) as indicated in the physician's order and facility policy. b. Resident 26 did not have a plan of care for the use of Xarelto (a medication used as blood thinner). These deficient practices had the potential for the residents not to receive the care and services needed which could lead to a decline in their wellbeing or maintain their highest potentials. Findings: a. A review of Resident 76's admission Record indicated Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 76's diagnoses included enterocolitis (an inflammation that occurs in a person's digestive tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to refer one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 21) to an audiologist (a physician who evaluates hearing disorders) for the need of a hearing device (a device used to improve hearing). Resident 21 did not receive an Audiology consultation in accordance with the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in increased hearing loss, difficulty with communication and decline in Resident 21's quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record, indicated Resident 21 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted last on 2/22/2020 with multiple diagnoses including essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure), [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome (a rare, serious disorder of the skin and mucous membranes) and unspecified hearing loss, unspecified ear. A review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 9/2/2021, indicated Resident 21 had no impairment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document specific indication for psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) drug for one of five sampled residents (Residents 80) as indicated on the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which may result in significant adverse (harmful) consequences to the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 80's admission Record indicated Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 80's diagnoses included schizophrenia ([serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) and major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep, feelings of guilt or inadequacy, and suicidal thoughts). A review of Resident 80's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the opened (in-use) Basaglar KwikPen insulin (Insulin Glargine - long-acting insulin- a hormone that works by lowering levels of sugar in the blood) was marked with the date opened as indicated in the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the loss of efficacy of the Basaglar KwikPen insulin. Finding: A review of Resident 296's admission Record indicated Resident 296 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 296's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and weakness. A review of Resident 296's History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/3/2021, indicated Resident 296 had the capacity to understand and made decisions. A review of Resident 296's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 12/7/2021, indicated Resident 296's brief interview of mental status (BIMS, screening that aids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-12-16 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information posted reflecting the actual hours worked and the total number of staff on 12/13/2021, 12/14/2021, and 12/15/2021 was accurate. This deficient practice had the potential to result in misinformation to the residents and the public of the facility's nursing staffing data. Findings: During an observation on 12/13/2021 at 11:27 am, a daily nurse staffing information was posted across south nurse's station and next to the sub-acute nursing station. During a concurrent record review on 12/16/2021 at 8:44 am and interview with Director of Staff (DSD), the nurse staffing information and the actual staffing sign in sheet for the staff who worked in the sub-acute unit reflected the following: 1. On 12/15/2021 for the 7 am to 3 pm shift, there was one Registered Nurse (RN) on the nursing staffing posting while the sign in sheet reflected two RNs. 2. On 12/15/2021 for the 11pm to 7 am shift, on the nursing staffing posting total number and actual hours worked by Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.1 | +1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JRB INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2001 |
| AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| ESCONTRIAS, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2015 |
| KADHIUM, SABAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/07/2003 |
| KLAVAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/1986 |
| PRADO, VERONICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/18/2016 |
| LEHMANN, LIBBY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2026 |
| NOTIS, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2026 |
| PERVAIZ, ZAID | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| JRB ENTERPRISES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2026 |
| LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
20 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056291. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.