No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

12627 Studebaker Road, Norwalk, CA 90650 · For profit - Individual · 86 certified beds · (562) 868-4767 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 868-4767 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$20,654 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,654 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13132 Studebaker Rd · (562) 868-3800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
13132 Studebaker Rd · (562) 219-4523 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10901 Imperial Hwy · (562) 868-6685 · Call to confirm hours
Park
12208 Hoxie Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12400 Studebaker Rd · (562) 716-3702

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.6%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.4%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.992.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.851.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.2%CMS range 33.2–59.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.8–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.3–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.471.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
1.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-08-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 60) received appropriate services, did not acquire a decline (reduction) in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and did not develop a contracture (chronic loss of joint motion associated with deformity and joint stiffness) to both hands and both wrists. The facility failed to: 1. Provide appropriate monitoring of Resident 60's ROM on a quarterly basis to determine any changes in ROM in accordance with the facility's policy titled Joint Mobility Assessment, ([JMS] a brief assessment of a resident's ROM in both arms and both legs) which indicated, all residents shall be assessed for joint mobility limitations upon admission and reviewed every three months thereafter. 2. Ensure Restorative Nursing Assistant ([RNA 1] certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) reported Resident 60's decline in ROM during restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 reported to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 that Resident 2 accused her (CNA1) of abuse on 3/1/2026. CNA 1 was reassigned to another area in the facility away from Resident 2 and on 3/2/2026 she was assigned to care for two residents who were Resident 2's roommates instead of suspending CNA 1 and removing her from the facility. 2. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 reassigned LVN 1 to care for other residents in the facility instead of suspending her and removing her from the facility when she was made aware of an allegation that LVN 1 inappropriately touched Resident 1. These deficient practices resulted Resident 1, Resident 2, and other residents' who resided in the facility being unprotected while CNA 1 and LVN 1 remained on the facility premises after being accused of abuse. These deficient practices placed Resident 1, Resident 2 and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 reported to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 that Resident 2 accused her of abuse on 3/1/2026 and Resident 2 reported to her that CNA 1 twisted her (Resident 2) arm on 3/2/2026 but LVN 3 did not report the allegation of abuse to the Administrator (ADM), who is the facility's abuse coordinator. 2. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was made aware of an allegation that LVN 1 inappropriately touched Resident 1 on 3/4/2026 but she did not report the allegation of abuse to the ADM. These practices resulted in the ADM, who was the facility's abuse coordinator, not knowing about the allegations of abuse made against CNA 1 and LVN 1, and the CDPH's inability to investigate the allegations of abuse in a timely manner. These deficient practices had the potential for information pertinent to the investigation to be lost…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that signs were posted at the facility entrance indicating the presence of Coronavirus Disease ([COVID-19] a potentially severe respiratory illness caused by coronavirus and characterized by fever, coughing, and shortness of breath) cases in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of further spreading COVID-19 to visitors, staff, family members, and the community. Findings:During an observation on 9/26/2025 at 8:08 a.m., at the facility entrance, there were no postings indicating there were COVID-19 cases in the facility. During a review of the facility's COVID-19 Line List, dated 9/2025, the Line List indicated there were two residents (Resident's 1 and 2) who tested positive for COVID-19. The Line List indicated Resident 1 tested positive on 9/23/2025 and Resident 2 tested positive on 9/25/2025. During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 9:58 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated Resident 1 tested positive for COVID-19 on 9/23/2025 and Resident 2 tested positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when:1. five boxes of tea bags were stored in the dry storage area with no date and label.2. An opened Clorox disinfecting wipes stored in the dry storage area.3. Three gallons of rainbow sherbet were stored in freezer #2 with no date and label.4. Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) did not wear hair covering in the food preparation area.These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in 45 out of 80 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/22/2025 at 8:22 a.m., with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) in the dry storage area, there were five boxes of tea bags with no date and label. The DSS stated all food items stored in the dry storage area should be labeled with received date and use by date. The DSS stated giving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures by failing to follow its policy regarding monitoring and documenting the temperature of laundry equipment (water temperature for washers and temperature for dryers) and logs daily.This failure had the potential to result in compromised infection control measures of the facility laundry and the spread of infection from bacteria (microorganisms that can cause infectious disease) throughout the facility.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/25/2025, at 10:55 a.m., with Laundry Aid (LA) 1, the facility's Water Temperature Log (WTL), dated 7/2025 was reviewed. The WTL indicated, water temperature for washers 1 and 2 were 140 Fahrenheit (F-a temperature scale) from 7/1/2025 to 7/25/2025. LA 1 stated, she was not sure where 140 F was referring from. LA 1 stated, the thermometer (an instrument for measuring and indicating temperature) above the washers indicated 120 F. LA 1 stated, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Complete and transmit the Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a resident assessment tool ) within the regulatory timeframe to the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 56 and 82). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a billing error and inaccurate data on resident care needs. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 56's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 56's diagnoses included squamous cell carcinoma (type of cancer), dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), and malignant neoplasm of the glottis (a cancerous tumor that originates in the middle part of the voice box). During a review of Resident 56's MDS assessment, dated 3/11/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 56's had modified independence (some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) assessment was completed accurately for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 54 and 49) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 54 who was receiving Restorative Nursing Assistant ([RNA], nursing aide program that help residents maintain any progress made after therapy intervention to maintain their function) services seven times a week and receiving splint (knee braces that improve range of motion and assist with contracture management) placement had an accurate assessment.2. Ensure Resident 49 had accurate documentation in the MDS to reflect his current tobacco use. These deficient practices resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Residents 54 and 49.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 54’s admission Record, the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 66), when Resident 66 was non-compliant by refusing to open his mouth for dental assessments during multiple dental staff visits.This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the quality of life and wellbeing for Resident 66 to prevent him from achieving his highest practical well-being. Findings:During a review of Resident 66's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy tube (a surgical procedure that creates a small opening in the neck, inserts a tube into the windpipe to help with breathing), dependence of respirator ventilator status (a person relying on a mechanical ventilator to breathe due to impaired lung function or respiratory muscle weakness), and gastrostomy (surgically created opening into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications, syringes, hand sanitizers and wound cleanser were not stored beyond their expiration dates in one of one disaster boxes (a container filled with emergency supplies e.g., medications, flashlights, extension cords, items for use in case of an emergency) stored in the Station 1 medication room.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the administration or use of expired medications and products, which had reduced effectiveness and the protentional to cause adverse effects to residents. Findings: During an observation on 7/23/2025 at 2:45 p.m., in the Station 1 medication room a disaster box the following expired items were found: 1 . Medline Acetaminophen bottle 100 tablets - expiration date 20022. Walgreens Ibuprofen bottle 100 tablets - expiration date 20213. [NAME] wound cleanser - expiration date 20224. 25 Medline Insulin syringes - expiration date 20245. 25 Medline spectrum 4oz hand sanitizers -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 73) was informed of the dental treatment recommendation for tooth extraction (the process of removing a tooth from its socket in the jawbone).This deficient practice violated Resident 73's rights to be fully informed and had the potential to result in delay of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 73 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 73's diagnoses included epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent unprovoked seizures), hypertension ([HTN] - high blood pressure), and congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 73's History and Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure Resident 2 was not administered Carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure) when Resident 2's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 and when heart rate (HR) was lower than 60 beats per minute (BPM) as ordered by physician. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 2 hypotension (blood pressure is too low) with dizziness and fainting which can lead to fall and injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record dated 3/17/2025, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], to the facility with diagnoses of, but not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), Atrial-Fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on tube feeding received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to:1. Elevate the head of the bed while receiving formula through the gastrostomy tube ([GT] - a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 40). This deficient practice had the potential to cause aspiration (inhalation of foreign materials) that could lead to pneumonia (lung infection) for Resident 40. Findings:During an observation on 7/22/2025 at 10:13 a.m. in Resident 40's room, Resident 40's was in bed lying flat on her back while the TF was running.During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 40 was initially admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and properly disposed discontinued medications per the facility's policy.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents accidentally ingesting unknown medications and increased the risk of diversion (any use other than that intended by the prescriber) of unknown medications.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, in medication storage room for station 1 and 2, there was an unlocked discontinued medication storage cabinet observed with 24 opened and unlabeled medications in a plastic cup inside of the cabinet. There was no pharmaceutical waste bin (a container, often color-coded, designed for the safe disposal of unused, expired, or contaminated medications) observed nearby. LVN 4 stated that all discontinued medications should be labeled and disposed of in blue pharmaceutical waste bins for safety to prevent accidental ingestion. LVN 4 stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), had monitoring for complications related to Xarelto (an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent harmful blood clots) a medication that may increase the risk of bleeding. This deficient practice placed Resident 2 at risk of bleeding a possible side effect of anticoagulant medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record dated 3/17/2025, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses of, but not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), Atrial-Fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat, or arrhythmia that can lead to blood clots, stroke, heart failure and other heart-related complications). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 4/12/2025, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow up on dental services for one of six sampled residents (Resident 32).This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 32 at risk for poor self-esteem and weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility 6/6/2024 with diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of food) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/3/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 32 was cognitively (mental processes that relate to acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) intact.During a review of Resident 32's Dental Notes dated 6/21/2024, the Dental Notes indicated Resident 32 was evaluated by the dentist and was noted to be edentulous (no teeth) and had old dentures with an inadequate fit. The Dental Note indicated Resident 32 requested new dentures with smaller…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foods that aligned with one of six sampled residents (Resident 51's) ethnic (of or relating to large groups of people classed according to common racial, national, tribal, religious, linguistic [language], or cultural origin or background) preferences. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 51 disliking the food provided and at times refused to eat meals provided by the facility. Findings:During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (face sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility 11/2/2025 with diagnosis including major depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness or loss of interest) and anxiety disorder (mental disorder characterized by significant and uncontrollable feelings of worry and fear). The admission Record indicated Resident 51's primary language was Spanish.During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 4/30/2025, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered care plan to meet the residents' needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) by failing to develop an individualized/person-centered care plan to address Resident 5's preferred activities. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record dated 5/19/2016, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses of, but not limited to, chronic respiratory failure (lungs gradually lose their ability to effectively exchange gases oxygen and carbon dioxide). Dependent on ventilator (a medical device to help support or replace breathing) status.During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 4/18/2025, section C indicated Resident 3's cognition level is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) failed to rinse G-tube (gastrostomy tube, a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach) syringe after medication administration on one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1's was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder where stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus, causing irritation and symptoms like heartburn). hemiplegia (complete paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (hemiparesis refers to partial or weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy tube (GT- a soft tube surgically inserted directly into the stomach to administer medication, fluids and nutrition)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to re-admit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), after Resident 1 was transferred on 10/1/2024 to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for evaluation of a possible small bowel obstruction (SBO-a blockage in the small intestine that prevents food, liquids, gas and stool from passing through normally), and the GACH cleared Resident 1 to return to the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being unable to return to the skilled nursing facility (SNF) that has been considered his home, for about 12 months, once deemed appropriate for transfer back to the SNF. Resident 1 had an unnecessarily prolonged stay of 14 days at the GACH placing Resident 1 at risk for unmet care needs, disorientation, confusion, psychosocial harm from being displaced and risk of acquiring infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record dated 10/25/2024, the admission Record indicated Resident 1, was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures on nine of 20 sampled residents (Resident 3,17, 20, 22, 33, 37, 60, 68 and 76) by failing to: a.Ensure the soiled tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea [also known as windpipe] to allow air to fill the lungs) supplies of (Resident 68 was disposed properly by the licensed staff. b.Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 wore personal protective equipment (PPE, specialized clothing or equipment worn by an employee for protection against infectious materials) who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms) during mealtime for Resident 33. c.Ensure physician observed Contact Isolation precautions (precautions used for disease, germs and infection that are spread by touching the patient and items in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) recommendation for three of three sampled residents. Facility failed to a. Obtain a PASARR Level II evaluation for Residents 54 and 36 and Level I evaluation for Resident 4 during admission. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for three of three sampled residents (Resident 36,54 and 4). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 54's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (a decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was formulated for two of three sampled residents: a.Resident 50 who was prescribed an anticoagulant medication (a medication used to lower the risk of stroke or blood clot in people); and b.Resident 68 who was prescribed an anti-anxiety medication (a medication used to treat excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness). These failures have the potential for delayed in the delivery of care and services to Resident 50 and Resident 68. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 50 was admitted at the facility on 2/21/2024 and was readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that usually happens when the airways that carry air to the lungs become narrow and damaged), anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread and uneasiness) and long-term use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure measurement of siderails to the bedframe and mattress were implemented and documented prior to installation of a full side rails to the bed of four of four sampled residents (Resident 55 and Resident 69, 14 and 80). This failure had the potential to physical harm from possible entrapment (when a person is trapped by the bed rail in a position they cannot move from) from the use of bed rails for Resident 55 and Resident 69, 14 and 80. Findings: a.During a record review of Resident 55's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 55 was admitted at the facility on 4/26/2022 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that usually happens when the airways that carry air to the lungs become narrow and damaged) and traumatic brain injury (a condition that occurs when a sudden trauma, such as a blow or jolt to the head, causes damage to the brain). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions (intervention that does not primarily use medication) were ordered for three of three sampled residents (Resident 50,68, and 75) who were prescribed psychotropic (any drug or substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medications. This failure had the potential to result in use of unnecessary psychotropic drugs for Resident 50, 68, and 75 that can lead to side effect (effect of a drug or other type of treatment that is in addition to or beyond its desired effect) and adverse drug reaction (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medicines). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (Face Sheet) the face sheet indicated Resident 50 was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] at the facility with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that usually happens when the airways that carry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dietary aide was knowledgeable on how to identify the amount of chlorine level in the dish washing machine by failing to: a. Ensure the chlorine level is 50 to 100 parts per million (PPM, concentration of chlorine used to sanitize dishes) of the dishwashing machine after the final rinse. b. Ensure the dish washing machine was checked and monitored for the right temperature of water and correct amount of chlorine before using. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses due to improper testing of chlorine level of the dishwashing machine. Findings: a. During a concurrent kitchen tour observation and interview on 8/19/2024, at 8:45 a.m. with Dietary Aide (DA 1), observed DA 1 ran the dishwashing machine and took a test strip to check the chlorine level of the water on the surface of a pitcher and resulted to 100 ppm. DA 1 stated the facility is using low temperature dish washing machine and she stated the chlorine level should be 200 ppm. DA 1 took another test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report change of condition (COC, major decline or improvement in a resident's status that will not resolve itself without intervention) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 60) with limited range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) concerns by failing to: 1.Report Resident 60's decline in ROM of both wrists and both hands to the physician in accordance with the facility's job description titled, Restorative Nursing Assistant, and policy and procedure tilted, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status. This failure resulted in Resident 60 from not receiving interventions to improve ROM, including intervention to prevent contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to joint stiffness). Findings: During a review of Resident 60's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 60 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) for restraint who is using full side rails for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14). This deficient practice has the potential to result in Resident 14 not receiving the necessary care and treatment. Findings: During a review of the Face sheet dated 8/23/24 indicated Resident 14 was admitted on 9/29/ 20, and readmitted 11/ 20/20, with diagnosis including Epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes recurring, unprovoked seizures), intellectual disabilities, convulsions (a sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body, caused by involuntary contraction of muscles) During a review of the History & Physical (H&P) dated 10/13/23, indicated Resident 14 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of the Active Order Summary Report dated 8/1/24 indicated Resident 14 had an order for [Restraint]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide foot care to one of four sampled residents(Resident 38) by: 1.Failing to check and monitor if a podiatry service ( diagnose and treat any foot or ankle problem) is needed for Resident 38 's toenails who had thick and overgrown toenails. This failure had the potential to cause discomfort and for Resident 38's toenails to cut into the skin due to their length. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia(loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering and reasoning which can affect and interfere with daily life and activities), history of traumatic brain injury(brain dysfunction caused by an outside force usually a violent blow to the head) and polyneuropathy( condition in which person's peripheral nerves are damaged). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately account for the use of a controlled substance (a medication with a high potential for abuse) on Controlled Drug Record (CDR- a log signed by the nurse with the date and time each time a controlled substance is given to a resident) for one resident (Resident 44) in one out of three medication carts reviewed (Middle Medication Cart Sub-Acute). This failure had the potential to result in unintended use of Tramadol (a controlled substance used to relieve and manage pain) and placed the facility and Resident 44 at risk for medication errors, drug loss and diversion. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information), dated 8/22/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 44 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including, but not limited to, polyneuropathy (a medical term to describe weakness, numbness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove an expired insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) per manufacturer's requirements, affecting one resident (Resident 56) in one of three inspected medication carts (Medication Cart 3 Back Cart.) This failure had the potential to result in hyperglycemia (a medical term used to describe high blood sugar) and/or hospitalization for Resident 56 because of receiving an expired insulin that could have been ineffective or toxic due to improper storage conditions. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, dated 8/21/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 56 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including, but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a medical condition characterized by the inability to control blood sugar) without complications. During a review of Resident 56's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure staff's personal items were not stored in the refrigerator and dry storage area. b. Ensure frozen food items were safely stored in the freezer. c. Ensure open food items are stored properly in the storage area. d. Ensure the [NAME] performed hand washing and change of glove after and before switching tasks in the kitchen. e. Ensure the drain area of ice machine was clean and free of grime. These failures had the potential to expose residents to food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites) and put residents at risk for cross contamination (unintentional transfer of harmful bacteria from one object to another). Findings: a. During an initial kitchen tour observation on 8/19/2024, at 8:13 a.m. a tumbler was stored in the reach in refrigerator. [NAME] (CK2) stated the tumbler belonged to a kitchen personnel and should not be stored in the refrigerator. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/2024, at 8: 16 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a care plan to meet the needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 was assessed at risk for elopement (leaving an institution without notice or permission) and required a wander guard (a system used to alarm staff of a potential elopement of a resident) to be applied. This deficient practice resulted a wander guard not being applied to Resident 1 and Resident 1 eloping from the facility on 11/26/2023. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain an injury and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive loss of memory), unsteadiness on feet, and anxiety (extreme worry). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]) a standard assessment and care screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as at risk for elopement (leaving an institution without notice or permission) with a wander guard, per their elopement Risk Evaluation. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility on 11/26/2023, without a wander guard in place. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain an injury and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive loss of memory), unsteadiness on feet, and anxiety (extreme worry). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]) a standard assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/10/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognitive (the ability to think, reason, and understood)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by: a. Failing to notify the responsible party of Resident 1 that an intruder entered Resident 1's room through the sliding door. This deficient practice potentially affected the delivery of care and services for Resident 1. b. Failing to assess Resident 1 for any physical or psychological problems after the intruder was observed in Resident 1's room. This deficient practice potentially placed Resident 1 at risk for unidentified harm that the intruder might have caused. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's Face sheet, the face sheet indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that causes restricted airflow and breathing problems), major depressive disorder, insomnia (inability of sleep), and anxiety. During a review of Resident 2's H&P, the H&P indicated that Resident 2 has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sliding door for one (Resident 1) of four sampled resident's rooms were secured and locked after certified nurse assistant (CNA) 1 and licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1 identified an intruder in the patio on 8/20/2023 at 10:10 p.m. This deficient practice resulted in the intruder entering the facility through Resident 1's sliding door and ending up in Resident 2's room on 8/20/2023 at 10:15 p.m., risking the health and safety of the residents and staff of the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1' s Face sheet (admission record), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of stroke (when blood flow to the brain is blocked or there is sudden bleeding in the brain) affecting the left side, major depressive disorder ( mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with daily life), and anxiety (persistent worry or fear that can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse reporting and investigating policy and procedure by not reporting an allegation of physical abuse for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the Ombudsman (a state agency that investigates, reports on, and assists in settling complaints against facilities). Resident 2 allegedly kicked at Resident 1 ' s feet and attempted to run a table into Resident 1's head. This deficient practice had the potential for the underreporting of abuse incidents, and a delay in investigation a physical abuse allegation, placing Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of brain (a cancer that spreads to other areas of the brain and spine) and cerebrovascular disease (group of disorders of the heart and blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by failing to submit the results of the investigation of an allegation of physical abuse to the state agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]) within 5 working days of the incident for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice delayed the CDPH investigation of the allegation of physical abuse, potentially placing Resident 1 at risk for further abuse and violation of resident rights. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of brain (a cancer that spreads to other areas of the brain and spine) and cerebrovascular disease (group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels) with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the comprehensive Minimum Data Set ([MDS] part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare-Medicaid certified nursing homes) within the regulatory timeframe for 21 of 22 sampled residents. This deficiency had the potential to negatively affect the provision of necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) public document titled, Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument ([RAI] a manual to offer clear guidance on how to complete the RAI [RAI -an assessment and planning tool] correctly) 3.0 User's Manual , dated October 2019, indicated that the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date ([ARD] refers to the last day of the observation [ process of observing resident in order to gain information] period that the assessment covers for the resident). During a review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P/P) titled, Resident Assessment, the P/P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. One Influenza (Flu) vaccine vial was labeled with an open date. 2. One Tuberculin protein purified derivative [(PPD), protein used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (bacterial infection of the lungs)] multidose vial was dated with an open date. 3. Resident 11's humulin insulin (medication used to control high blood sugar) vial was labeled with an open date. 4. Resident 368's Tramadol ([controlled substance] medication to treat moderate to severe pain) 50 milligram (mg) bubble pack (sealed card that packages doses of medication) was stored in the medication cart eight days after the resident was discharged from the facility. 5. Personal belongings for Resident 50 including a razor, coins, paper money, and one brass colored ring from an unidentified resident were not stored in the Station 1 medication cart. These deficient practices had the potential for licensed nurse to administer expired medications to residents, drug diversion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 43 and 119), who required staff's assistance with meals, were cared for with dignity and respect by sitting and not standing while feeding the residents during mealtimes. This deficient practice potentially violated Residents 43 and 119 rights, and had the potential to negatively affect the resident's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: a. During an observation on 12/7/2021 at 7:50 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) was observed standing while feeding Resident 119 eggs. Resident 119, was observed slumped down in the bed and positioned on her right side facing the door of the room. CNA 2 stated Resident 119 kept sliding down after she was repositioned. CNA 2 stated standing while feeding residents was not the facility's standard of practice and stated she should have been seated while feeding Resident 119. During a review of Resident 119's admission Record (face sheet), the face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 21 of 22 sampled residents. Cross Reference F640. This deficiency had the potential to incorrectly identify each resident's preferences and goals of care, and their functional and health status. Findings: During a review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) public document titled, Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument ([RAI] a manual to offer clear guidance about how to use the RAI 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, indicated the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date ([ARD] refers to the last day of the observation [process of observing resident in order to gain information] period that the assessment covers for the resident). During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P/P) titled, Resident Assessment, (undated), the P/P indicated the following,The Minimum Data Set shall be completed for each resident regardless of payer status in facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of one sampled residents (Resident 21), after Resident 21 verbalized to the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (ADM) that she felt uncomfortable interacting with Resident 56. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 21 wanting to avoid Resident 56 and not wanting to participate in group activities. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 21's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), morbid obesity (100 pounds [unit of measurement] or more above ideal [healthiest weight for a person's height] body weight), generalized anxiety disorder (mental disorder causing difficultly in controlling anxiety [a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease] and staying focused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 45) received the minimum amount of oxygen required based on the resident's oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen traveling through your body with your red blood cells) according to physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: During a review Resident 45's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 45's with diagnosis included congestive heart failure ([CHF] a condition in which the heart can not pump enough blood to the body's other organs, end-stage renal disease ([ESRD] the stage of renal impairment that appears irreversible and permanent, and requires a regular course of dialysis [treatment that filters and purifies the blood using a machine] or kidney transplantation to maintain life), dementia (long term and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer the correct dosage of Docusate Sodium (stool softener) capsule and properly dispose of a Lovenox (blood thinner) injection syringe into the biohazard container for one of six sampled residents (Resident 46). These deficient practices resulted in Resident 46 receiving an inaccurate dose of medication which had the potential to result in constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels), and the improper disposal of a syringe had the potential to cause injury to staff. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 46's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 46's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (chronic autoimmune [attack of healthy cells) disorder affecting movement, sensation, and bodily functions), functional quadriplegia (paralysis [inability to move] of all four limbs), long term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner), and heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed by failing to don (put on) gloves and use an alcohol swab to disinfect a resident's abdomen prior to administering a subcutaneous (under the skin) injection. These deficient practices resulted in improper infection control practices performed by staff placing the residents at risk for infection. Findings: During an observation of a medication pass on 12/8/21 at 8:22 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4), LVN 4 was observed verifying the physician order on the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for Lovenox injection 40 milligrams ([mg] unit of measurement) subcutaneously for Resident 46. LVN 4 administered the Lovenox injection in the right lower abdomen. LVN 4 did not perform hand hygiene, did not don gloves, and did not cleanse the abdomen with alcohol prior to administering the subcutaneous injection. During an interview on 12/8/21 at 8:42 a.m. with LVN 4, LVN 4 stated she was supposed to perform hand hygiene after she gave Resident 46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,654 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $20,654 — penalty dated 2024-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 5California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 5Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 5Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 5Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 5Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 5Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Highland Springs Care CenterBeaumont, CA 2 of 5Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Santa Fe LodgeEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 3 of 5Green Acres Healthcare CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 5 of 5Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Pico Rivera Healthcare CenterPico Rivera, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST21%since 06/30/2023
KLAVAN, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN, LIBBYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
NOTIS, SHMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
PERVAIZ, ZAIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
FRIEDMAN, IRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
KLAVAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
PATEL, ROMYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2022
SKAJEM, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/18/2023
VICTORIA, RAFAELITOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2011
INTERCOMMUNITY INVESTMENTS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 14%Other / private 4%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$477per resident / day
operating cost
$14,504per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$505per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055457. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next