Northridge Care Center
7836 Reseda Blvd, Reseda, CA 91335 · For profit - Corporation · 97 certified beds · (818) 881-7414 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (90) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.57 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.97 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 35.5–51.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 9.4–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 6.6–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.44 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
90 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm by one resident towards another) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when on 10/1/2023, Resident 1 hit Resident 2 in the head with a trashcan lid, and Resident 2 hit Resident 1 in the head with a wooden back scratcher. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 being subjected to physical abuse while under the care of the facility, and both Resident 1 and Resident 2 required transfer to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for possible head injuries as a result of the physical altercation. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/9/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included depression (persistent sadness) and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from medications errors by failing to: 1.Ensure the scheduled 9 p.m. dose of atorvastatin calcium (a medication used to lower cholesterol) was administered as ordered or, if not administered, that the omission and reason were documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident). 2.Ensure that the licensed nurse who administered the resident's medications accurately documented the medication administration in the MAR. This deficient practice resulted in an inability to determine whether Resident 2 received the prescribed medication and had the potential to result in medication errors, compromise medication safety, and create confusion regarding the delivery of resident care and services.During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Seet indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call light (a device used by a resident to signal his/her need for assistance from staff) was within reach of a resident while the resident was in bed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the resident's ability to request assistance, which could result in delayed staff response, delayed provision of necessary care and services, and unmet resident needs. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 7/10/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (brain disorder that affect brain function), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition in which the body does not use insulin [a vital hormone produced by the pancreas that regulates blood sugar] effectively, resulting in elevated blood sugar levels) with foot ulcer (an open sore or wound on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow up with the physician after notification of a change of condition (COC- a sudden clinically important deviation from a resident's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains) when a resident had an abnormal laboratory result and failed to monitor the resident after a change of condition for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential result to negatively affect the provision of necessary care and services.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/14/2026 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarction (refers to tissue death in the brain caused by a blocked blood vessel) affecting left dominant side, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was accurately documented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4), consistent with accepted standards of professional practice and the care and services provided. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the resident's plan of care, and the delivery of necessary care and services. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a life-threatening collection of blood between the brain and its tough outer covering [the dura], caused by a head injury) without loss of consciousness (a temporary state in which a person in unaware of themselves and their surroundings and cannot respond to stimuli), acute pulmonary edema (sudden buildup of fluid in the lungs), and contusion (bruise) of scalp (the skin on the top and back of your head where your hair grows). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment by not ensuring effective pest control in one of four sampled residents' rooms (Resident 3's room). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for vector-borne diseases (illnesses caused by viruses or bacteria transmitted through the bites of infected living organisms, primarily blood-feeding insects).During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated that the facility admitted Resident 3 on 5/13/2026 with diagnoses that included left total hip replacement, osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P - a comprehensive medical document that includes a detailed account of a resident's medical history, a physical examination, a clinical assessment, and a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's licensed nurses failed to accurately complete Fall Risk Evaluation assessment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at increased risk for falls and fall-related injuries due to the failure to appropriately identify and evaluate fall risk factors.During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/10/2020 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide radiology (a branch of medicine that uses imaging technology to look inside the body) services in accordance with the physician's order for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2), following a fall incident. The facility failed to ensure timely completion of a radiology service to evaluate Resident 2's left foot, which was noted to have swelling and pain rated four (4) out of 10 (on a scale where zero indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in diagnosis and treatment of the resident's condition.During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated that the facility admitted Resident 2 on 1/30/2026 with diagnoses that included right arm fracture (broken bone), epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder that causes a person to have recurring seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) failed to report the presence of roaches observed in a resident's room for one of four sampled residents' rooms (Resident 3's room). This deficient practice had the potential to create unsanitary conditions and contribute to cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful germs from one surface, object, or food to another), placing residents, staff, and visitors at increased risk for infection.During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated that the facility admitted Resident 3 on 5/13/2026 with diagnoses that included left total hip replacement, osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 3's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility staff notified the resident representative after one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a change of condition after being found on the floor next to the bed with an injury.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's representative not being notified of Resident 1's change of condition and had the potential for of the resident representative to be unable to make informed decisions regarding Resident 1's treatment and plan of care. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 9/15/2025 and most recently readmitted Resident 1 on 9/27/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the bladder [a hollow, muscular organ that stores urine or urinary tract [the body's drainage system designed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) laboratory results were communicated with the physician in a timely manner.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to have a delay in care and services, increased risk for worsening infection and decrease in overall health status.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 9/15/2025 and most recently readmitted Resident 1 on 9/27/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the bladder [a hollow, muscular organ that stores urine or urinary tract [the body's drainage system designed to produce, store and remove urine [liquid waste and extra water]), history of falling and depression (mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 79 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had complete information documented on the change of condition form (COC-a form used by the facility document changes in resident's condition including actions taken and notification of the physician and responsible party) by failing to document Resident 1's physician's response to Resident 1's change of condition.This deficient practice had the potential to delay necessary treatment, care and services, placing Resident 1 at risk for a decline in overall health status.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated that the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/15/2025 and most recently readmitted Resident 1 on 9/27/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the bladder [a hollow, muscular organ that stores urine or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately and safely provide pharmaceutical services to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses sign/initial the form titled Controlled (medications which have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) Drugs Count Record at the end of each shift to verify the count and accountability of controlled medications. 2. Ensure Licensed nurses documented the correct remaining amount of morphine sulfate in the form titled Controlled Drug Record for Liquid Only. 3. Ensure the date and time of administration of morphine sulfate was accurately documented in Resident 1's Antibiotic or Controlled Drug Record for Liquid Only and electronic medication administration record (eMAR). These deficient practices had the potential to result in inaccurate narcotic counts, inability to reconcile controlled substances, and increased risk for medication diversion (unauthorized taking, use, or distribution of a resident's prescribed medications, particularly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the baseline care plan (a document designed to facilitate communication among members of the care team that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the provision of care and services provided to Resident 1. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the baseline care plan (a document designed to facilitate communication among members of the care team that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the provision of care and services provided to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 to the facility on 5/08/2026, with diagnoses including ankylosing spondylitis (an inflammatory arthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to: 1. Complete a pain assessment upon admission when Resident 1 verbalize pain on 5/8/2026 at approximately 5:24 p.m. 2. Provide timely pain management interventions for Resident 1, including non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions (administer pain medications, including available house stock acetaminophen and controlled medications [CM-medications which have a potential for abuse and ay also lead to physical or psychological dependence] accessible through the emergency kit [e-Kit] such as hydrocodone-acetaminophen [Norco]). 3. Document medication administration of Norco and morphine sulfate in the electronic medication administration record (eMAR). 4. Conduct and document pre-administration and post-administration pain assessments for Resident 1. These deficient practices had the potential to result in unrelieved pain, emotional distress, diminished comfort, and a decline in psychosocial wellbeing and overall quality of life. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure titled, Physician's Untimely Visit, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's physician did not conduct the initial comprehensive visit within 72 hours of admission. This failure had the potential for the physician to miss identifying and addressing Resident 1's early care needs, including pain management. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on 5/08/2026, with diagnoses including ankylosing spondylitis (an inflammatory arthritis that causes severe, persistent pain and stiffness in the spine), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/11/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 11 is able to make needs known but unable to make medical decision. During a review of the facility census dated 5/08/2026, the census reflected Resident 1's name as an active resident. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to complete Resident 1's Clinical admission Record and admission Notes. This failure had the potential to delay identification of Resident 1's needs and impact timely care planning. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including ankylosing spondylitis (an inflammatory arthritis that causes severe, persistent pain and stiffness in the spine), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/11/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 11 is able to make needs known but unable to make medical decision. During a review of Resident 1's Document titled Clinical admission Record (CAR), dated 5/08/2026 and timed 5:24 p.m., the CAR indicated Resident 1 arrived…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by:1. Failing to ensure Resident 1 received Methadone (a medication used to treat severe pain), as ordered by the physician on 4/27/2026. 2. Failing to ensure Resident 2 received Apixaban (a medication used to assist with preventing a stroke [blood flow to part of the brain is blocked]), Losartan Potassium (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), Famotidine (a medication used to decrease the amount of stomach acid produced in the body) and Modafinil (a medication used to treat excessive sleepiness), as ordered by the physician on 4/22/2026 and 4/27/2026. These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk for unmanaged pain and diminished quality of life, and placed Resident 2 at risk for adverse clinical outcomes, including stroke, uncontrolled blood pressure, excessive sleepiness, and diminished…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored and documented intake (food and fluid consumption) and output (urine and stool amounts) in accordance with professional standards of practice and per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for one of six sampled resident (Resident 1), who had fluid restrictions. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unrecognized hydration needs and hypervolemia (fluid overload).Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/11/2025 and readmitted the resident on 12/30/2025 with diagnoses including acute (sudden, intense flare-up) on chronic diastolic (pressure during the relaxing of the heart) congestive heart failure (CHF - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), chronic pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs), and orthostatic hypotension (a sudden, temporary drop in blood pressure that occurs when standing up from a sitting or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a resident's fall risk assessment for two out of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's Fall Risk Evaluation was completed thoroughly and accurately. 2. Ensure Resident 2's systolic blood pressure (SBP - the first number in a blood pressure reading, which measures the pressure in the arteries [pathway that carries blood away from the heart] when the heart beats) was completed lying and standing when performing Resident 2's Fall Risk Evaluation. These deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at risk of injury from falls.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/11/2025 and readmitted the resident on 12/30/2025 with diagnoses including acute (sudden, intense flare-up) on chronic diastolic (pressure during the relaxing of the heart) congestive heart failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician telephone order indicated a signature and title of the licensed nurse who transcribed the information and failed to ensure a physician countersigned the telephone order per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in failure to deliver the necessary care and services.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/11/2025 and readmitted the resident on 12/30/2025 with diagnoses including acute (sudden, intense flare-up) on chronic diastolic (pressure during the relaxing of the heart) congestive heart failure (CHF - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), chronic pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs), and orthostatic hypotension (a sudden, temporary drop in blood pressure that occurs when standing up from a sitting or lying position).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Notify residents of the location of results of the most recent survey (means the Statement of Deficiencies [Form CMS-2567] generated by the most recent standard survey for four (Resident 7, Resident 71, Resident 75, and Resident 81) of six sampled residents who attended the resident council meeting. 2. Post the results of the most recent standard survey of the facility. These deficient practices had the potential for residents and family members to not know how the facility is performing regarding resident care. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 7's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident to the facility on 1/09/2018 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the confidential personal information of residents were protected by failing to ensure documents (meal tickets) containing protected information ([PHI]- any health information that can be used to identify specific individual which must remain confidential to prevent harmful consequences) were not shredded prior to disposing in the waste container. This failure had the potential to violate 84 of 90 residents' rights for privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records. Findings: During an observation on 1/28/2026 at 9:02 a.m., observed Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) threw diet tickets in the trash. During an interview on 1/28/2026 at 9:56 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated their process of dishwashing included sorting all the paper, waste, trash, leftover food and throw it in the trash. The DS stated their process for disposing of the meal tickets is to place it in the bin on top of the counter and the evening shift dishwasher would put it in the shredder by the end of the day. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents received necessary services for activities of daily living (ADL) when the facility failed to provide five of nine showers scheduled from 12/31/2025 to 1/28/2026 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 32's personal hygiene and compromise resident's dignity and self-worth. Findings: During review of Resident 32's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 32 to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included fracture (a break in a bone) of neck of left femur (thigh bone), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (blockage of the flow of blood to the brain, resulting in brain tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three of three (Resident 101, Resident 88, Resident 65) residents investigated for antibiotic use by failing to: 1.Remove an intravenous (IV, into or within a vein) saline lock catheter (a small, flexible hollow tube inserted into a vein used to provide fluids and medication into a resident's vein) for Resident 101 after an IV medication therapy was completed. 2. Label the IV insertion site dressing per facility protocol for Resident 88. 3. Follow the physician's' orders to change the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC - flexible tubing inserted into a large vein near the heart for long term intravenous IV medication) line dressing and bio patch (a small, sterile, antiseptic-coated [kills/stops bacteria growth] foam dressing) every seven days for Resident 65. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two of two sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 77) reviewed under the respiratory care area, with necessary respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Ensure there was a physician's order to administer continuous oxygen therapy to Resident 5. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 5, who required continuous oxygen therapy, at risk for respiratory distress. 2. Ensure Resident 77, who had an order for continuous oxygen therapy, was wearing his oxygen nasal cannula (NC - a device that delivers supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) at all times. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 77 at risk for respiratory distress. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 3/16/2024 with diagnoses that included asthma (long-term disease that causes the airways in the lungs to become inflamed, narrow, and filled with mucus), seizures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency skills when: 1.Cooks could not verbalize time and temperature monitoring for thawing foods in the preparation sink. 2. Staff could not verbalize and demonstrate how to check the chlorine concentration following manufacturer's guidelines. These failures had potential to result in harmful bacterial growth and cross-contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food and drinks that are contaminated with germs or chemicals) in 84 of 90 medically compromised residents who received food and ice from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation on 1/28/2026 at 10:05 a.m. of the meat preparation sink, observed unsealed fish and meat thawed at the same time in the same sink in running water. During an interview on 1/28/2026 at 12:02 p.m. with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 stated they took out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved appearance, flavor and temperature when: 1.The temperature of the milk measured 42 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, degree of temperature), the juice measured 61 F and the triple fruit crisp measured 98 F. 2. Herb crusted beef roasts were dry. These failures had potential to result in 84 of 90 facility residents including (Resident 13) at risk of unplanned weight loss, a consequence of poor food intake, getting food from the kitchen. Findings: 1.During a review of the facility's menu spreadsheet (a sheet containing the kind and amount of food each diet would receive) titled Winter Menus, dated 1/27/2026, the spreadsheet indicated residents on regular and therapeutic diets would include the following foods on the tray: -Herb crusted beef roasts three (3) ounces (oz, a unit of measurement) -Brown gravy 1-2 oz -Mashed potatoes 1/2 cup (c, a household measurement) -Zesty spinach 1/2 c -Parsley sprig garnish yes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1.One (1) of three (3) racks in the dry storage area were corroded and rusted.2.There was elbow macaroni, split peas particles on the dry storage room floors. 3. Kitchen equipment and utensils were not free from dirt, dust and food debris. a. Sticker residues on 13 food storage bins in the dry storage area. b. Nine (9) of 9 carts had old tape and sticker residues. c. Drying racks were dusty and dirty when touched. d. Vents by the dishwashing area had dust accumulation and buildup. e. Coffee spout had dirt buildup f. Condiment containers had sugar, salt, pepper and sweetener particles and debris. 4. Seven (7) of 7 dented cans were stored with non-dented cans. 5. Fifty-seven (57) of 57 trays had cracks and lost their glaze. 6. Pans were stacked wet and were not air dried. 7. Improper thawing of meats in the sink a. Fish and chicken were thawed at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to enforce its policy of storing brought in by family or visitors in a way to ensure safety and sanitary storage of food when one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 95) brought unpasteurized egg (raw shell eggs that have not undergone heat treatment to destroy potential pathogens like salmonella [a type of bacteria that causes gastrointestinal infections in humans]) and cooked it in the microwave without the staff knowledge. This failure had the potential to result in consumption of undercooked food and food borne illness (a disease caused by consuming food and drinks that are contaminated by germs or chemicals) from salmonella to Resident 95. Findings: During a review of Resident 95's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 95 on 6/10/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (DM 2 - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain medical records that are complete and accurately documented by facility staff documenting that the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC - flexible tubing inserted into a large vein near the heart for long term intravenous IV medication) line dressing and bio patch (a small, sterile, antiseptic-coated [kills/stops bacteria growth] foam dressing) were changed on 1/13/2026 and 1/20/2026 when the actual dressing indicated it was last changed on 1/10/2026 for one of three residents (Resident 65) investigated under antibiotic use.This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate documentation in Resident 65's medical record and the potential for infection/irritation at the PICC line site. 2. Safeguard medical record information against unauthorized use when there was documentation of medication administration when the licensed nurse was not working at the facility, but another user documented under his login ID. This had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards when: A medication tube was brought into a resident's room, medication was applied, and the medication tube was placed back into the medication cart without cleaning it for one out of five sampled residents observed during medication administration This deficient practice increased the risk of transmission of infectious microorganisms to other residents in the facility. Resident's Oxygen (O2) nasal cannula (NC - a device that delivers supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) was found touching the floor for one of two sampled residents (Resident 77) reviewed under respiratory care area. This deficient practice had the potential for contamination of the resident's care equipment, increasing the risk of infection. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 65's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner that promoted resident dignity and respect for two of three residents (Resident 9 and Resident 77) when: 1.Resident 9, who had a documented preference to wear her own clothing, was observed dressed in a hospital gown (loose fitting garment worn by patients for examination, procedures or while staying in the hospital). 2.Resident 77 was observed wearing only an incontinent brief (adult diaper), leaving the resident exposed. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect residents' self-esteem and sense of self-worth. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 9's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 9 to the facility on 9/5/2025 with diagnosis that included Parkinsons disease (a progressive, long-term brain disorder that primarily affects movement, causing shaking, stiffness, and slow jerky motions), essential hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment to one of two sampled residents (Resident 44) reviewed under the environment task by failing to ensure the button of Resident 44's call was not broken. This deficient practice has the potential to cause discomfort to Resident 44's thumb when using the call light to request for assistance. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 44 on 11/7/2025 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), aftercare following joint replacement surgery (a procedure to remove a damaged, stiff, or arthritic joint and replace it with an artificial device), and osteoarthritis (the most common, chronic joint disease, often called wear and tear arthritis) of the right knee. During a review of Resident 44's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/10/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 44 had the capacity to understand and make decisions and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a new level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) when a resident was diagnosed with a serious mental illness diagnoses of bipolar disorder (mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) on 12/2/2025 for one of one sampled resident (Resident 44) investigated under the PASARR care area. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 44 not receiving specialized services required by the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 44 on 11/7/2025 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, aftercare following joint replacement surgery (a procedure to remove a damaged, stiff, or arthritic joint and replace it with an artificial device), and osteoarthritis (the most common, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 22 sampled residents (Residents 2 and 95) had a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a document that outlines a resident's healthcare needs, goals, and the interventions planned to achieve those goals) when: 1.For Resident 2, the black box warning (the strongest safety alert for prescription drugs) for the resident's prescribed hydrocodone-acetaminophen (an opioid medication used to treat pain) was not included in the resident's care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to increase Resident 2's risk of experiencing adverse effects (harmful, undesired reactions) from the prescribed hydrocodone-acetaminophen. 2. For Resident 95, the facility failed to create a care plan on bringing raw food, unpasteurized eggs (raw shell eggs that have not undergone heat treatment to destroy potential pathogens like salmonella) from an outside source into the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in consumption of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered Care Plan after a fall incident for one of six residents (Resident 66) investigated under the care area of accident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 66 not receiving the necessary care and services to prevent recurrence of falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 5/14/2025 and readmitted the resident on 11/17/2025 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and history of falling. During a review of Resident 66's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/08/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had the ability to usually make self- understood and the ability to usually understand others and required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a clear antibiotic treatment plan affecting one of three residents (Resident 88) for antibiotic use, by failing to clarify the resident's antibiotic therapy with the physician to determine whether the order needed to be updated. As a result, there was a lack of clear direction regarding two (2) doses of Resident 88's originally prescribed 20-dose Zosyn (a broad-spectrum antibiotic used to treat pneumonia [a lung infection]) regimen. This failure had the potential to result in incomplete antibiotic treatment regimen, confusion among the licensed nurses regarding Resident 88's updated antibiotic regiment as well as cause antibiotic resistance (occurs when bacteria evolve defenses to survive, multiply, and evade the drugs designed to kill them, rendering treatments ineffective, which can occur if an antibiotic is not taken as ordered in its entirety) to develop for Resident 88. Findings: During a review of Resident 88's Face Sheet (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards for two of six sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 66) reviewed under the accidents care area by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 3, who has a seizure (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness) has padded side rails (adjustable rigid plastic or metal bars attached to the bed that may be positioned in various locations on the bed; upper or lower, either or both sides) as indicated in the resident's care plan (a document that outlines a resident's healthcare needs, goals, and the interventions planned to achieve those goals). This deficient practice placed Resident 3 at an increased risk of injury. 2. Ensure Resident 66's wheelchair is locked and footrests are folded when not in use. As a result, Resident 66's feet were caught in the wheelchair`s footrests while attempting to ambulate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 3) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) when the resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) tubing had a u-shaped dependent loop causing urine to collect and back up the tubing. This deficient practice placed Resident 3 at an increased risk of developing a UTI. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 3 on 9/15/2004 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (the loss of brain function due to a chemical imbalance in the blood), UTI, and multiple sclerosis (MS- a chronic, progressive disease involving damage to the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a blood pressure medication was held when a resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP-the force of blood against artery walls when the heart beats, representing the top number in a blood pressure reading) was below 110 millimeters of mercury (mmHg- a special unit that measures pressure shows how high a column of mercury rises) for one of three residents (Resident 4) reviewed for Closed Record. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as hypotension (low blood pressure) that could require hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 11/20/2025 with diagnoses including muscle weakness and hypertension (high blood pressure- a common condition that affects the body's arteries). During a review of Resident 4`s History and Physical (H&P- the most formal and complete assessment of the patient and the problem), dated 11/28/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 4 can make needs known but cannot make medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was properly stored when one of two inspected medication carts (Medication Cart 1) had unlabeled, unpackaged tablets in the bottom of a cart drawer. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving an incorrect or expired medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation of Medication Cart 1 and interview on [DATE] at 2:38 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, one orange oval shaped tablet, one round white tablet, one white oval tablet, one half piece of a round yellow tablet, and two quarter pieces of a round, white tablet were observed to be unpackaged and unlabeled at the bottom of a drawer in the medication cart. LVN 3 stated the medications should not have been stored in that manner. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated all medications should be safely stored in the medication cart in their packaging and if they are not, they need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the food services department when a fruit fly (a type of insect) was observed in the residents' dry food storage. This failure had the potential to result in 84 of 90 residents, who received food from the kitchen, to acquire food borne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated foods or beverages) by consuming potentially contaminated food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/27/2026 at 8:07 a.m., of the food storage with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), observed a fly flying around the area. The DS stated they have a fruit fly in the dry storage room. During an interview on 1/28/2026 at 12:40 p.m. with the DS, the DS stated the kitchen should be fly-free as flies could cause cross-contamination and they do not know what sickness it could bring to the residents. The DS stated residents could get sick from contaminated food. During a review of facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled Pest Control Policy, dated 11/20/2026, the P&P indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided with a proper functioning bed pad alarm (an alerting device intended to monitor a resident's movement) as ordered by the physician.This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at an increased risk for further falls, accidents, and injuries.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/19/2024 with diagnoses that include fracture (break in a bone) of right femur (thigh bone), hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis [complete or partial loss of muscle function]) following cerebral infarction (stroke- loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting left non-dominate side, morbid obesity (excessive body fat), dementia (a progress state of decline in mental abilities), and history of falling.During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/21/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had capacity to understand and make decisions.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a thorough Trauma (refers to an emotional, psychological, or physical response to a deeply distressing or disturbing event that overwhelms a resident ' s ability to cope) Care Evaluation was completed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a written course of action that helps a resident achieve outcomes that improve their quality of life) that addressed past trauma and triggers (something that reminds you of a past traumatic experience and causes a strong emotional reaction, like experiencing the trauma again) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices had the potential to result in delayed identification of underlying trauma-related issues, which could compromise resident care, delay appropriate referrals, and negatively impact resident outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/12/2023 with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy to four of seven residents (Resident 54, 35, 58 and 3) observed during medication administration. This deficient practice violated the resident`s right to be treated with dignity and respect which could affect the residents' sense of self-worth and sense of well-being. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 10/31/2024 with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects how the body uses sugar [glucose] for energy). During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/07/2024, the MDS indicated that the resident's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills for daily decision making intact and the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan (a care plan is a form where you can summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) addressing the residents activity needs for two of three (Resident 15 and 69) residents investigated under the activity care area. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to not receive the necessary care and services related to their activity needs. 2. Revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan addressing nutritional needs of one of three (Resident 25) residents investigated under the nutrition care area. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 25 to not receive the necessary care and services related to his nutritional needs. Findings: 1.a. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure a multi-dose vial (contain more than one dose of medication) of Aplisol (used in a skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis [TB, a contagious bacterial infection that can affect the lungs and other parts of the body)] infection) found in one of three medication rooms (Medication Room A), was labeled with an open date. This deficient practice increased the risk that residents could have received the medication that had become ineffective or toxic and result in health complications and inaccurate test results. b. Ensure one unopened insulin (a medication to treat diabetes mellitus [a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar]) pen (an injection device with a needle that delivers insulin) was not stored in Medication Cart 2 for one of one sampled resident (Resident 8). This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of insulin and result in mismanagement of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control guidelines when Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) was observed leaving a resident's room during a medication pass observation while still wearing an isolation gown and gloves for one (Resident 295) of nine residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-a method of using personal protective equipment [PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments] to reduce the spread of pathogens between residents in skilled nursing facilities). This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of spreading infection to other residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 295's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included discitis ( an infection or inflammation of the discs in the spine [the backbone, a column of bones that runs from the base of the skull to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) was completed timely for one (Resident 37) out of 1 sampled resident. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of necessary care and services for Resident 37. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/24/2024 with diagnoses including asthma (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation in the airways, making it difficult to breathe) and Parkinson`s disease (a chronic brain disorder that causes movement problems, and can also impact mental health, sleep, and pain). During a review of Resident 37's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition (thought processes) and dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs - fundamental skills that people need to care for themselves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan for an individual's specific health needs and desired health outcomes) for one of four sampled resident (Resident 58) investigated under accidents. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 58 to not receive the necessary care and services to prevent potential injury caused by the use of bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed that are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes) Findings: During review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/08/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and history of falling. During a review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 02/08/2024, the MDS indicated the resident's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate and consistent activities for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 52). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 52's physical, cognitive, sense of belonging, and emotional health. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record (Face sheet) , the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including paraplegia (a chronic condition that involves the loss of muscle control in the lower half of the body), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities). During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool and care screening tool) dated 11/1/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents and hazards for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 50) reviewed under the accidents care area by failing to ensure Resident 50 did not store medications at bedside readily accessible to other residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents obtaining medication without staff knowledge resulting in accidental ingestion causing harm to residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/30/2022 and readmitted the resident on 5/31/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes mellites type 2 (a long-term medical condition in which the body does not use insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of sugar in the blood] properly), myalgia (muscle aches and pain), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral feeding (EF, also known as tube feeding, a method of supplying nutrients directly in to the gastrointestinal [the body's system for processing liquids and foods] tract) received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 47) by failing to cover the enteral feeding tube with a cap after disconnecting the tubing from Resident 47 once the enteral feeding had been completed. The deficient practice had the potential to contaminate the enteral feeding system and placed the resident at risk for infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident 47 on 6/14/2024 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that occurs when the air sacs of the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label the insertion site (areas where intravenous [IV, into or within a vein] lines are placed such as the forearm) of the intravenous catheter (a device used to provide medications) dressing per facility protocol to one out of three sampled residents (Resident 13) who had an IV access. This deficient practice has the potential to fail to identify the signs and symptoms of intravenous site insertion complications such as swelling and redness in the insertion site. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the document indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/24/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 13 was cognitively (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for risk of entrapment from the use of bed side rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure for one of one sampled residents (Resident 58). This deficient practice had the potential for inappropriate use of bed rails that could lead to entrapment and result to injury. Findings: During review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/08/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and history of falling. During a review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 02/08/2024, the MDS indicated the resident's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills for daily decision making was intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure leftover food brought from outside by resident`s family and visitors was labeled with resident identifier and use by date for one of one (Resident 141) sampled resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illness (also called food poisoning, illness caused by eating contaminated food) among the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 141's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness and history of falling. During a review of Resident 141`s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 12/26/2024, the MDS indicated the resident`s cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills for daily decision making was intact. The MDS also indicated that the resident was dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure regarding Weight Change by failing to ensure a resident's physician's progress note addressed a resident's weight loss for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to lead to a delay or lack of delivery of care and services for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/7/2024 with diagnoses that included fracture (break in the bone) of the first lumbar vertebra (bone in the spine of the lower back), lumbar region spondylosis (inflammation and stiffness in the spine), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 6/14/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses). During a review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered by the physician and follow the physician's order for pain medication parameters for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1's pain not being managed properly and potentially cause the resident to experience prolonged discomfort and pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/7/2024 with diagnoses that included fracture (break in the bone) of the first lumbar vertebra (bone in the spine of the lower back), lumbar region spondylosis (inflammation and stiffness in the spine), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 6/14/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses). The MDS further indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care consistent with the professional standards of practice to help prevent pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1's bilateral (both) heel protectors (device that can help prevent and treat heel pressure ulcer) were place on the resident's heels as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for development and worsening of Resident 1's pressure ulcer. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (when lungs are unable to get enough oxygen into your blood) with hypoxia (body does not have enough oxygen to function normally), and type two (2) diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy by failing to reorder and refill one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) Alprazolam (a medication used to treat anxiety disorder [a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness]) timely (five days in advance of anticipated need). This deficient practice resulted in delay in the delivery of medication for Resident 1's and may result to Resident 1 having anxiety attacks. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 6/8/2024 and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and anxiety disorder. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical dated 6/21/2024 indicated Resident 1 has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior by one resident towards another) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) on 6/19/2024, when Resident 2 struck Resident 1 in the face with his closed fist. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to physical abuse by Resident 2 while under the care of the facility and had the potential to cause emotional harm which could result to a feeling of embarrassment, low self-esteem, and self-worth. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (overconsumption of alcohol that results in permanent scarring that damages the liver and interferes with its functioning), acute respiratory failure (when the air sacs of the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection control policy and procedures for Isolation (separation of an infected resident from the healthy resident until the infected resident is no longer able to transmit the disease)- Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP- used to prevent infection transmission) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5), when on 3/1/2024 upon re-admission of Resident 5, who was positive for Clostridium Difficile (also known as C. Diff, a germ [bacteria] that causes diarrhea [a condition in which feces are discharged from the bowels frequently and in a liquid form] and colitis [an inflammation of the colon]), was cohorted (place infected residents with the same organism in the same room) with Resident 6 who was not on Isolation-TBP and did not have a diagnosis of Clostridium Difficile. This deficient practice had the potential to spread the infection and cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria [germs]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviewed, the facility failed to implement its policy titled Tuberculosis [TB- a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs] Infection Control Program by failing to conduct an annual TB Risk Assessment (TBRA- assessment that identifies and evaluates the risk of transmission of TB within the facility) as indicated. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for tuberculosis. Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 4/6/2024 at 12:43 p.m., the IP reviewed the facility's Tuberculosis Risk Assessment policy. The IP stated that he has not conducted the facility's Tuberculosis Risk Assessment because he was not aware of the facility's Tuberculosis Risk Assessment policy. The IP continued to state that he was not aware of the policy until today (4/6/2024). When asked what the reason was why he was not aware of the Tuberculosis Risk Assessment policy, the IP stated that his concentration has been on Covid (a highly contagious respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to hold anti-hypertensive medication (a type of drug used to treat high blood pressure) if pulse rate (PR- a measurement of the heart rate, or the number of times the heart beats per minute) was lower than 60 beats per minutes (bpm - unit of measure) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for side effects including very slow heartbeats and lightheaded feeling. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/09/2023 and readmitted Resident 1 on 1/29/2024 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body can not properly store or use blood sugar) and hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 12/19/2023, indicated Resident 1 was able to understand and be understood, could make decisions, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a treatment plan to manage hypoglycemia (a condition in which the body's blood sugar level goes below the standard range; severe cases may trigger a loss of consciousness or seizures [a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells (also called neurons or nerve cells) that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements (stiffness, twitching or limpness), behaviors, sensations or states of awareness]) for Resident 1 who was receiving insulin (to lower the level of sugar in the blood) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for delayed interventions of hypoglycemia. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/09/2023 with a readmission dated 1/29/2024. Resident 1 diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body can not properly store or use blood sugar). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document blood sugar (BS - body's primary source of energy) level accurately for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). On 3/9/2024 at 12:30 p.m., Resident 1's blood sugar level was documented as 1796 milligrams per deciliters (mg/dL- unit of measure) and on 3/11/2024 at 9:00 p.m. Resident 1's BS was documented as 27 mg/dL when the normal fasting (without eating for eight hours) BS level range from 100 to 125 mg/dL. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate medical record information and had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's medical treatment plan. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/09/2023 with a readmission dated 1/29/2024. Resident 1 diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body can not properly store or use blood sugar) and hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure residents' insulin was given according to the physician's orders for two of four sampled residents (Resident 46 and 50) investigated for insulin administration by failing to ensure Resident 46 and 50's blood sugar check and insulin were documented immediately after being given. This had the potential to cause confusion for when a resident actually received their insulin. 2. Ensure Station 2 Medication Room did not have an emergency kit (E-kit a box that contains medications that can be given to residents quickly in time of need, i.e. a medication ordered such as antibiotic, or a pain medication) that had expired. This had the potential for a resident to receive expired medications that were less effective. 3. Ensure the Controlled Drug Record (CDR-accountability record of medications that are considered to have a strong potential for abuse) coincided with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one of three sampled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) were given according to the physician's orders for three of four sampled residents (Resident 10, 46, and 50) investigated for insulin administration by failing to: 1. Ensure a blood sugar was taken before meals and insulin was administered as ordered for Resident 10 and Resident 46. 2. Ensure Resident 50 received the ordered insulin on 12/24/2023 at 4:30 p.m. and did not receive ordered insulin too early on four instances in 12/2023. This had the potential for the residents to have uncontrolled blood sugars and result in mismanagement of diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) in residents. Findings: 1.a. A review of Resident 10's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/4/2012 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, hypertension (high blood pressure [the force of the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication and biologicals were stored with currently accepted professional standards for two of three medication carts (Med Cart 1 and 2) investigated during the Medication Storage task by failing to: 1. Ensure one opened bottle of glucometer (medical device for determining the approximate concentration of glucose [sugar] in the blood) Control Solution (solutions used to test the glucometer for proper function) found in Med Cart 1 was not used past 90 days. 2. Ensure one opened bottle of glucometer test strips (works with glucometer to read the blood sugar levels) found in Med Cart 2 was labeled with an open date. These deficient practices had the potential cause inaccurate blood sugar readings and mismanagement of residents with diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). 3. Ensure one opened ipratropium bromide inhalation solution (medication to help relieve shortness of breath) was labeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident's urinal (a container used to collect urine) was labeled with a resident identifier for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 36) investigated for infection control. 2. Ensure a resident's oxygen tubing (device that delivers oxygen) was labeled with the date of when it was last changed for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 58 and 244) investigated for infection control. 3. Ensure a resident's nasal cannula (a medical device that delivers supplemental oxygen therapy to people with low oxygen levels) oxygen tubing was not touching the floor for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 244 and 57) investigated for infection control. These deficient practices had the potential to result in contamination of the resident's care equipment and risk of transmission of bacteria that can lead to infection. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect by failing to ensure Certified Nurse Assistant 3 (CNA 3) knocked and asked permission from the resident before entering the room for one of one sampled resident (Resident 68) reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 68's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 4/6/2022 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a general term for loss of memory and other thinking abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/9/2023, indicated Resident 68 rarely made self-understood and rarely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of five sampled residents (Residents 70 and 28) investigated for accommodation of needs. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay in resident care and for the residents' needs to remain unmet. Findings: a. A review of Resident 70's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/1/2023 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and adult failure to thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, and inactivity. A review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/8/2023, indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) and was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs - activities related to personal care). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide the resident and/or his/her responsible party with written information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 38 and 45) investigated for advance directive. This deficient practice violated Resident 38 and 45's and/or his/her representative's rights to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advance directive and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding his/her health care. Findings: a. A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 5/7/2021 and readmitted the resident on 2/15/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure [the force of the blood pushing on the blood vessel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room temperature was between 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement for temperature), as indicated in the policy and procedure, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 36) investigated under the care area of environment. This deficient practice resulted in the resident's increased level of discomfort and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/9/2018 and readmitted the resident on 3/21/2021 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (condition in which not enough oxygen passes from your lungs into your blood). A review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 10/26/2023, indicated the resident had intact cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) and required moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (a written document outlining a patient's needs, goals, and care) within 48 hours of admission for one of one sampled resident (Resident 294) who was on anticoagulant (helps prevent blood clots [clumps that occur when blood hardens from a liquid to a solid]) therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 294. Findings: A review of Resident 294's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/21/2023 with diagnoses including history of falling and diabetes mellitus (DM- chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of Resident 294's History and Physical (a physician's examination of a patient) dated 12/23/2023, indicated that Resident 294 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 294's physician's orders dated 12/21/2023, indicated an order for Heparin sodium (an anticoagulant- a blood thinner that's used to treat and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan (a written document outlining a patient's needs, goals, and care) for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 246 and 38) by failing to: 1. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 246's use of buspirone (medication used to treat anxiety disorders [(intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations]). 2. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 38's Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA- specially trained Certified Nursing Assistant who use specialized techniques to maintain and improve each resident's abilities and functions) program. This deficient practice had the potential to result in failure to deliver necessary care and services. Findings: a. A review of Resident 246's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/9/2023 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood), hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood), and a history of falling. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a written course of action that helps a patient achieve outcomes that improve their quality of life with specific interventions for two of three sampled residents (Resident 69 and 84) by: 1. Failing to ensure Resident 69's care plan for Alteration in Nutritional Status dated 7/10/23 was reassessed and revised after the resident experienced a significant weight gain (a gain of 10 percent [%-unit of measure] of a resident's body weight in a period of six months) of 13% of 10/5/2023. 2. Failing to ensure Resident 84's care plan for Actual Pressure Ulcer( is a breakdown of skin integrity due to pressure) dated 10/27/2023 was reassessed and revised after the resident's sacral (tail bone) pressure ulcer progressed from a stage II (A shallow wound with a pink or red base ) to a stage IV (pressure injuries extend to muscle, tendon, or bone) These deficient practices had the potential to negatively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' low air loss mattress (LAL - mattresses designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcers [skin and soft tissue injuries that can occur when an area of skin is under pressure for a long time or is applied with great force over a short period] by reducing pressure and moisture build-up on the skin) was set to the correct setting according to the residents' weight for two of four sampled residents (Resident 5 and 70) investigated for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of discomfort and development of new pressure ulcers. Findings: a. A review of Resident 70's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/1/2023 with diagnoses including stage four (4) pressure ulcer (characterized by severe tissue damage that extends below the subcutaneous fat [type of fat that's stored just beneath the skin] into deep tissues) of the sacral region (the part of the spine between the lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a laboratory test in a timely manner as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 78) by failing to ensure Resident 78's serum digoxin level (measures the amount of digoxin that is in the body) was obtained when ordered. This deficient practice placed Resident 78 at risk for digoxin toxicity (type of poisoning that occurs in people who take too much of the medication) and ineffective medication. Findings: A review of Resident 78's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/1/2023 with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy (condition that makes it hard for the heart to deliver blood to the body), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and congestive heart failure (condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 78's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 11/8/2023, indicated that the resident had intact cognition (ability to think, understand and reason). A review of Resident 78's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices by failing to ensure food items not in their original containers were labeled and dated. This deficient practice had the potential to place 88 of 93 residents living in the facility at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During an observation of the facility's kitchen and concurrent interview on 12/26/2023 at 7:56 a.m., with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1), observed a container bin containing potato flakes. Upon closer inspection, the container bin containing potato flakes did not have a date as to when the content was poured into it. DA 1 stated that he forgot to write the date on the container bin to be able to track when the content was placed into it. During an interview on 12/28/2023 at 1:47 p.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM stated that any food item that is removed from their original container and placed in another container must be labeled with a date. The DM added that this protocol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-27 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — patternReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19, a highly contagious viral infection that can trigger respiratory tract infection) policy by failing to ensure residents and their residents' representatives were informed of the COVID-19 case status of the facility for three of three sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 7 and Resident 8). This deficient practice has the potential to violate residents' rights and/or representatives' rights to be informed of the facility's COVID-19 status. Findings: a. A review of Resident 6 ' s admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 10/5/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain) and asthma (a respiratory condition causing difficulty in breathing). A review of Resident 6' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 10/11/2023, indicated Resident 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control policy and procedures by failing to ensure two staff members (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN 1] and Certified Nursing Assistant 1 [CNA 1]) donned (put on) a face shield, gown, and gloves prior to entering a Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19, a highly contagious viral infection that can trigger respiratory tract infection) isolation room (a type of room that keeps resident with infectious illnesses away from other residents) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection and cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria [germs] from one person, object, or place to another) among staff other residents. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/16/2023 with diagnoses that included fracture (break) of unspecified part of neck of right femur (upper leg bone), and COVID-19. A review of Resident 3 ' s History and Physical dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility ' s Influenza (also known as the flu, it is an infection of the nose, throat, and lungs) vaccine (medication that prevents infection from influenza) policy by failing to ensure residents were assessed for their current vaccine status and offered the influenza vaccine upon admission for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not be aware of the risks and benefits of the influenza vaccine. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/2/2023 with diagnoses that included acute osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone due to infection) of the right ankle and foot; and Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19, a highly contagious viral infection that can trigger respiratory tract infection). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1105B of the Act by failing to report an allegation of physical abuse (any intentional act causing injury, trauma, bodily harm or other physical suffering to another resident by way of bodily contact) on 9/25/2023 within two (2) hours of being made aware of an allegation of Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) using bed sheet as a physical restraint (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment attached to a resident's body restricting the resident's freedom of movement) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility and failure to protect the resident from further abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/17/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Assistant ' s (CNA) certification was renewed and active while working at the facility for one of two sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant 1 [CNA 1]). This deficient practice had the potential for knowledge, training, and certification deficit leading to inadequate resident care. Findings: A review of CNA 1 ' s License and Certification Verification Detail Page (system that displays information to show the status of a CNA ' s certification, whether active or inactive) verified by the Direct of Staff Development (DSD) on [DATE], indicated that CNA 1 ' s certification was active and due to expire on [DATE]. A review of CNA 1 ' s License and Certification Verification Detail Page dated [DATE] indicated that no data available when checking the status of CNA 1 ' s certificate. During an interview with the DSD on [DATE] at 12:14 p.m., DSD stated that the facility had failed to confirm and check to ensure CNA 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 27 out of 42 resident rooms (Rooms 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 a. b., 14 c. d., 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 35, 37, 39, 41 and 42). Rooms 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 31, 32, 35, 37, 39, 41 and 42 all have two beds in each room. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had 4 beds in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for all the residents and inadequate working space for the health caregivers. Findings: During a review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter dated 1/6/2026, submitted by the Administrator (ADM), the request for the 27 rooms was reviewed. The letter indicated the rooms did not meet the 80 square feet requirement per federal regulation. The letter indicated the residents' beds were in accordance with the special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) per resident in 27 of 43 resident rooms (Rooms 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, and 42). The room size for these rooms had the potential to have inadequate space for resident care and mobility. Findings: On 01/06/2025, the Administrator (ADM) submitted an application for the Room Variance Waiver, dated 01/06/2025, for 27 resident rooms. The room waiver request indicated the following: Room # Square Footage (sq ft) Bed Capacity Sq Ft per Resident 4 154.64 2 77.32 6 155.25 2 77.625 8 151.20 2 75.6 10 153.9 2 76.95 11 153.17 2 76.585 12 153.17 2 76.585 14 153.17 2 76.585 15 157.95 2 78.975 17 153.17 2 76.585 18 157.93 2 78.965 19 153.17 2 76.585 20 157.93 2 78.965 21 157.93 2 78.965 22 155.11 2 77.555 23 157.93 2 78.965 24 158.68 2 79.34 25 155.11 2 77.555 27 309.54 4 77.385 28 309.54 4 77.385 29 153 2 76.5 31 153 2 76.5 33 154.18 2 77.09 35 154.18 2 77.09 37 154.18 2 77.09 39 154.18 2 77.09 41 154.18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to lead to a delay or lack of delivery of care and services for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/7/2024 with diagnoses that included fracture (break in the bone) of the first lumbar vertebra (bone in the spine of the lower back), lumbar region spondylosis (inflammation and stiffness in the spine), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's physician's Progress Notes dated 6/10/2024, the progress notes indicated Resident 1 had significant physical disability (any physical limitations or disabilities that inhibit the physical function of one or more limbs of a person). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square (sq.) feet (ft.) per resident in 27 of 43 resident rooms (Rooms 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, and 42). The room size for these rooms had the potential to have inadequate space for resident care and mobility. Findings: On 12/26/2023, the Administrator (ADM) submitted an application for the Room Variance Waiver, dated 10/10/2023, for 27 resident rooms. The room waiver request showed the following: Room # Square Footage (sq ft) Bed Capacity Sq Ft per Resident 4 154.64 2 77.32 6 155.25 2 77.625 8 151.20 2 75.6 10 153.9 2 76.95 11 153.17 2 76.585 12 153.17 2 76.585 14 153.17 2 76.585 15 157.95 2 78.975 17 153.17 2 76.585 18 157.93 2 78.965 19 153.17 2 76.585 20 157.93 2 78.965 21 157.93 2 78.965 22 155.11 2 77.555 23 157.93 2 78.965 24 158.68 2 79.34 25 155.11 2 77.555 27 309.54 4 77.385 28 309.54 4 77.385 29 153 2 76.5 31 153 2 76.5 33 154.18 2 77.09 35 154.18 2 77.09 37 154.18 2 77.09 39 154.18 2 77.09 41 154.18 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JRB INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 06/30/2023 |
| DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| JOSEPHSON, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| KARAPETIAN, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| KLAVAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/1986 |
| SALCEDO, ARLENE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2016 |
| LEHMANN, LIBBY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/21/2026 |
| NOTIS, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/21/2026 |
| PERVAIZ, ZAID | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056412. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.