Chino Valley Health Care Cente
2351 S Towne Avenue, Pomona, CA 91766 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (909) 628-1245 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,361 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.53 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 86.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.4–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.46 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 98.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 3), who was cognitively impaired (refers to difficulties with thinking, learning, remembering, and using judgment, among other mental abilities) and was assessed at risk for elopement (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) did not elope from the facility's secured unit (specialized healthcare setting that restricts patient/resident movement and access to promote safety with measures such as locked doors and surveillance) on 4/24/2025, at 7: 06 PM by failing to ensure: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 closed/locked the door when CNA 6 exited the facility's secured unit and ascertained (make sure of) Resident 3 did not follow CNA 6 out of the secured unit. 2. Receptionist (RC) 1 clocked and set the alarm on the front door located in the facility's lobby to prevent Resident 3 from leaving the facility without supervision. 3. CNA 7 implemented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of five percent or greater medication error rate. The facility had three total medication errors in 33 opportunities for errors yielding a total of 9.09 percent error rate during medication pass (process through which medication is administered [the act of giving a treatment, such as a drug, to a patient]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 43) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 did not administer a delayed release (a drug that does not dissolve or release its active ingredient right away when swallowed) aspirin (ASA, a medication used to treat mild to moderate pain) to Resident 43.2. LVN 3 did not administer Resident 43's lamotrigine (a medication used to treat seizure [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness] disorders) per physician orders when Resident 43 swallowed the medication whole instead…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in one of one kitchen (Kitchen 1) when the following was observed: On 6/9/2026, an open container, filled with a white flaky powder substance, was unlabeled and undated in Kitchen 1's cooking area. On 6/9/2026, [NAME] (CK) 1 was not wearing a beard cover while preparing food in Kitchen 1. On 6/11/2026, one of two sampled sanitizing solution buckets (Solution Bucket, SB 1) did not have the correct concentration required to effectively kill bacteria (microscopic single-celled organisms some can make people sick) and organisms from kitchen surfaces in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Sanitizing Equipment and Surfaces. These deficient practices had the potential to result in cross contamination (the process by which microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one area/object to another with a harmful effect) or foodborne illness (a sickness caused by eating or drinking food and beverages contaminated with harmful germs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body) prevention and control practices by failing to ensure:a.Personal care items found inside the shared restrooms for five of five sampled residents (Residents 37, 2, 107, 48, and 75) were labeled and stored properly.b. The lint screen/trap and base (bottom) for three of three sampled commercial laundry dryers (CLD 1, CLD 2, CLD 3) were free of dense accumulation of lint (a thick, cottony pad [about the thickness of a felt sheet or small quilt] that completely hides the screen).c. One of two sampled [NAME] & [NAME] restrooms (JJR 1 [a shared restroom situated between two bedrooms with direct access from both rooms], specifically the restroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] shared by Residents 33, 53, 59, 61, 65, and 73 ) was in a clean and sanitary condition when fecal matter was observed on the floor and sink area. These deficient practices had the potential to result in cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 77), was free from abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) when Resident 86, who had a history of sexual inappropriate behavior, touched Resident 77 on the left breast on 5/30/2026.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 77 getting startled, upset, and screaming for help and had the potential to result in psychosocial (relates to how a person's mental health and social environment [relationships, community] affect each other) harm to Resident 77.Findings:During a review of Resident 77's Face Sheet (FS, admission record), the FS indicated Resident 77 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, and Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) discharge assessment in a timely manner for one of two sampled residents (Resident 14) as indicated in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's (CMS, a federal agency that manages health care programs in the United States) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a tool used by nursing homes to assess the needs, strengths, and preferences of residents, mandated by CMS) Manual.This deficient practice resulted in a late completion and transmission of Resident 14's discharge MDS to CMS' Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System (an MDS record that passes CMS' standard edits and is accepted into the system) which had the potential to affect the accuracy of Resident 14's clinical information used for care planning and quality reporting.Findings:During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS-admission record), the FS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's condition for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 79) by:Coding Resident 12 as receiving limb restraints when the resident was not using limb restraints.Coding Resident 79 as not having a serious mental illness when the resident had diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), bipolar type (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). This failure had the potential to result in an inaccurate representation of Resident 12's and Resident 79's clinical status, inappropriate care planning and interventions, and inaccurate quality measure reporting that may have impacted resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 106) within 48 hours of the resident's admission.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 106 not receiving necessary care and services.During a review of Resident 106's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unsteadiness on feet and tobacco use. The FS indicated Resident 106 did not have any other diagnosis.During a review of Resident 106's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/7/2026, the H&P indicated, Resident 106 lacked capacity to independently make and understand complex medical decisions due to schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and cognitive impairment (problems with mental functions like memory, thinking, learning, and decision-making).During an interview on 6/10/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions to prevent the development or worsening of existing pressure injuries (PI, lesion/wound caused by unrelieved pressure usually over a bony area that results in damage of underlying tissue) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's, who had a PI, low air loss mattress (LALM, special type of mattress used for both the prevention and treatment of PI, prioritizes moisture control and temperature regulation to prevent skin breakdown) was not set to the correct setting.This failure had the potential to result in delayed wound healing, worsening of Resident 2's PI, and the development of new PI's or skin breakdown to Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (FS-admission record), the FS indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 4/9/2026 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury), mild protein-calorie malnutrition (not getting enough nutrients and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents' (Resident 4) environment remained as free of accident (any unexpected or unintentional incident, which results or may result in injury or illness to a resident) hazards as possible when Resident 4 was observed biting and chewing on a towel.This deficient practice had the potential to cause teeth or gum damage, jaw strain and/or choking to Resident 4 risking Resident 4's overall physical health.Findings:During a review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (FS-admission record), the FS indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain is temporarily confused or impaired), unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (difficulty initiating a swallow due to problems in the mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 106) when Resident 106's Face Sheet (FS-admission record) did not indicate a complete cumulative diagnosis list (a complete list of a resident's active medical diagnoses).This deficient practice resulted in incomplete documentation for Resident 106 and had the potential to result in Resident 106's medical needs not being addressed.Findings:During a review of Resident 106's FS, dated 6/10/2026, timed at 9:43 AM, the FS indicated Resident 106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The FS's diagnosis information indicated unsteadiness on feet and tobacco use.During a review of Resident 106's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/7/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 106 lacked capacity to independently make and understand complex medical decisions due to chronic (persistent or long-lasting) schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) to the California Department of Public Health (the Department), to the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and to the local law enforcement a resident-to-resident altercation within two hours in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigation, dated September 2022.This failure resulted in the delay of notification to the Department and had the potential for Resident 3 to be subjected to abuse while at the facility.A. During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (FS-document that contains a patient's personal and contact information, diagnoses and brief medical history, allergies, and name and contact information of patient's physicians), the FS indicated the facility readmitted Resident 3 on 3/19/2026 with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 11) who was re-admitted to the facility after a surgical procedure had a skin assessment.This failure had the potential for Resident 11 receiving delayed care and treatment for Resident 11's surgical wounds which could lead to infection.During a review of Resident 11's Face Sheet (FS, document that contains a patient's personal and contact information, diagnoses, and medical history), the FS indicated Resident 11 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lack of coordination and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (patient had surgery on the left thigh bone and is now in the healing phase).During a review of Resident 11's History and Physical (H&P, physician's clinical evaluation and examination of the resident), dated 10/5/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by failing to report one allegation of injury of unknown origin to the state agency (Department of Public Health) and law enforcement within the required reporting time frames for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2).This deficient practice delayed the investigation of abuse and placed Resident 2, and other residents at risk for abuse and feelings of intimidation.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a change (confusion, memory loss or loss of consciousness) in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), unspecified dementia with anxiety (significant cognitive decline and excessive worry or restlessness), and long-term use of anticoagulants (medications that prevent or reduce blood clotting). During a review of Resident 2's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff member failed to notify the responsible party when 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) moved to another room. This failure resulted in lack of timely communication with Resident 1's responsible party regarding changes in Resident 1's Room/environment.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-Face Sheet), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/5/2026, with diagnoses including dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration).During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/7/2026 the H&P indicated, Resident 1 does not have the mental capacity to make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/11/2026, the MDS indicated the cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decisions making was moderately impaired, and required partial/moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) who required supervision during showers.This failure resulted in Resident 1 being found in the shower area without staff supervision, placing the resident at risk for injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-Face Sheet), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/5/2026, with diagnoses including dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration).During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/7/2026 indicated, the H&P Resident 1 does not have the mental capacity to make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/11/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decisions making was moderately impaired, and required partial/moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (individualized document developed to manage a patient's physical, mental, emotional, and social health needs) with interventions (action taken to improve a situation) for three of eight sampled residents (Residents 3, 6 and 7).Findings:1. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (disturbance of the brain's functioning that leads to problems like confusion and memory loss) and respiratory failure (serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe, lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical Examination (H&P, physician's clinical evaluation and examination of the resident), dated 3/28/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an adequate amount of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) worked in the South Dementia unit (unit designed to meet the specific needs of residents with dementia [a progressive state of decline in mental abilities]) on the NOC shift (overnight shift from 11 pm to 7 am) on 3/8/2026, 3/11/2026 and 3/21/2026, in accordance with the facility's Facility Assessment Tool (FAT - facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies), dated 3/19/2026. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving inadequate care and supervision which can lead to falls, elopement, and delayed recognition of residents' significant changes in condition.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/2/2026 at 11:30 am with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the FAT, the Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-in Sheet from 3/1/2026 to 3/31/2026, and CNA Timecards were reviewed. The FAT, dated 3/19/2026, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete an SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation-a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change of condition among the residents) Communication Form for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 7) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status when:1. There was no SBAR found in Resident 3's medical record regarding Resident 3's skin rash (abnormal changes in skin color or texture and are typically associated with irritation or swelling) on both hands. 2. There was no SBAR found in Resident 7's medical record regarding Resident 7's generalized body rash.These deficient practices placed Resident 3 and Resident 7 at risk of not receiving appropriate care.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an accessible call light system as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled, Call System, Residents, by failing to ensure the call light pull cords were within reach from the floor for ten of 10 sampled residents (Residents 4, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26) when using Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] and Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER].This deficient practice had the potential to delay the provision of care for Residents 4, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 and negatively affect the residents' well-being when the residents were unable to call staff for assistance.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 4 to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted Resident 4 on 10/8/25, with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a group of conditions that causes brain dysfunction which alters brain function or structure), and schizophrenia (a chronic mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 15) to the California Department of Public Health (the Department), the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and to the local law enforcement within two hours, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated 9/2022.This failure resulted in the delay of notification to the Department and had the potential to result in Resident 15 to be subjected to abuse while at the facility.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted the resident on 9/24/2025 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition causing excessive, persistent fear and worry disproportionate to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary shower for 1 out of 1 shower room in the facility where a black substance was observed on the tile under the shower handle.This deficient practice had the potential for all residents who used the shower to be placed at risk for respiratory health hazards.Findings:During an observation on 1/22/26 at 2:57 p.m. in Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] with CNA 27, Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be large enough to accommodate a shower across from the toilet area. A black substance on the tile (2 tiles in length; or 8 inches) was observed below the shower handle and above the grab bar.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/26 at 3:21 p.m. in Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] with the Maintenance Assistant (MA), MA stated the black substance on the shower tiles was mold and should be cleaned right away.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/26 at 3:32 p.m. in Bathrooms #3 with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HKS), HKS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record, the facility failed to maintain safe food handling practices according to the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Daily Food Temperature Control, and Refrigerator/Freezer Storage, by failing to:1. Ensure the temperatures of freezer 1, freezer 2, refrigerator (fridge) 1, and fridge 2 were checked and logged from 9/3/2025 to 9/18/2025.2. Ensure the temperatures of freezer 2 that stored ice cream, remained below zero (0) degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of temperature measurement) and fridge 1 that stored milk and dairy products, remained below 40 degrees F.3. Ensure the temperature of the milk in fridge 1 remained below 40 degrees F.4. Ensure the temperatures of food served during the tray line (the plating of hot and cold food being served to residents each meal) were checked logged before serving breakfast and lunch 9/3/2025 to 9/17/2025, dinner 9/2/2025, 9/8/2025, 9/9/2025, 9/14/2025, and 9/15/2025, and breakfast on 9/18/2025.5. Ensure the gravy was kept on the steam table and that the temperatures of gravy, milk and fish were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during provision of perineal care (cleaning and maintaining the area between the anus and the genitals) and changing of incontinence briefs (disposable diaper) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 3 feeling embarrassed and having loss of self-esteem.a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/12/2025 with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 8/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to make daily decisions), required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when one of one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1) did not wash or sanitize hands after exiting Resident 1's shower room and before touching Resident 2.This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (transfer of germs and harmful substance) and spread of infection.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted the resident to the facility on 7/31/25 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar level) and acute kidney failure (kidneys can't filter waste).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 7/28/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to understand and process thoughts) for daily decision making.During a review of Resident 1's History & Physical (H&P) dated 8/1/25, the H&P indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a skin rash (an area of irritated or swollen skin that can be red, itchy, painful, or bumpy) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 discharged Resident 1 without doing a skin check (a visual examination of the skin surface) on 5/29/2025.This failure resulted in delayed treatment for Resident 1's skin rash and had the potential to result in physical decline to Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 11/21/2023 and readmitted the resident 1/12/2024 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic [persistent or long-lasting] disease characterized by high blood sugar levels due to insufficient insulin [a hormone which regulates the amount of sugar in the blood] production) and major depressive disorder (mental health condition where a person experiences a persistent low mood, loss of interest in activities and other symptoms that significantly impact daily life).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) who had an order of X-ray (an imaging test to create detailed pictures of the organs) of the left hand was implemented in a timely manner, as ordered. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive necessary care and services to immediately meet the resident's medical needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/9/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily functioning), history of falling, and age-related osteoporosis (a medical condition in which the bones become brittle and fragile) During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/30/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired cognitive skills (ability to make daily decisions). The MDS indicated Resident 1 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures for two of two sampled residents (Resident 45 and Resident 202). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 45 and Resident 202's feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 45's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 45 on 12/28/2017, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 1/27/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 45 rarely/never understood verbal content and rarely/never able to express ideas and wants. The MDS indicated Resident 45 was dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) 8 and 9 know how to recognize verbal abuse and implement the facility's policy on abuse for two of two residents (Residents 23 and 47) on 4/29/2025. These deficient practices had the potential to expose other residents in the facility to abuse and cause distress, fear and nervousness. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 23 was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including impulse disorder (having a hard time resisting urges or impulses, often leading to unwanted behaviors), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and mood disorder (a mental health condition that causes significant and persistent changes in a person's emotional state, energy levels, and behavior). During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 3/21/2025, the MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items in one of one kitchen were stored and distributed in a sanitary manner by failing to: a. Ensure expired dry food items were not kept in storage in one of one kitchen (Kitchen 1). b. Ensure proper ice handling practices by one of one kitchen staff (Dietary Aide 1) during lunch tray line. These deficient practices had the potential to expose 97 of 97 residents to food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating/drinking contaminated foods) and could negatively affect the health of the residents at the facility. Findings: a. During an observation on 4/28/2025 at 8:55 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM), in the dry storage area of Kitchen 1, there was one (1) pack of hamburger bun with a used by date of 4/20/2025 and 1 can of pork and beans with a use by date of 5/2024. During an interview on 4/28/2025 at 9:10 AM with the DM, the DM stated the expired hamburger bun and pork and beans would be thrown away. The DM stated the kitchen staff follow the first in, first out (valuation method where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure gnats (a group of tiny, winged flies) were not found inside the kitchen area. This deficient practice had the potential for gnats to multiply and fly to other areas of the facility or contaminate food. Findings: During an observation on 4/28/2025 at 8:25 AM, there were 4 tiny black colored flying insects below the sink area. The [NAME] stated the flying insects were gnats. During an interview on 5/1/2025 at 5:11 PM with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM stated food particles could attract gnats, so the staff cleaned the kitchen thoroughly after the gnats were found. The DM stated the facility needed to ensure there were no gnats present inside the kitchen because the flying insects could go to the food and contaminate the food which could affect food safety. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pest Control Policy, the P&P indicated the facility shall maintain an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 47) was free from verbal abuse as indicated by the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program. This deficient practice resulted in verbal abuse to Resident 47 and had the potential to lead to psychosocial harm to Resident 47. Cross Reference F609 Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 8/26/2020, and re-admitted the resident on 9/21/2024, with diagnoses including impulse disorder (a group of behavioral conditions that make it difficult to control your actions or reactions), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and unspecified mood disorder (a mental health condition that causes significant and persistent changes in a person's emotional state, energy levels, and behavior). During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report verbal abuse within two hours that involved one of one sampled resident (Resident 47) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating. This deficient practice prevented timely investigation and implementation of appropriate measures, which could potentially allowed continued abuse to Resident 47. Cross Reference F600 Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 8/26/2020, and re-admitted the resident on 9/21/2024, with diagnoses including impulse disorder (a group of behavioral conditions that make it difficult to control your actions or reactions), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and unspecified mood disorder (a mental health condition that causes significant and persistent changes in a person's emotional state, energy levels, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enter a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave, characterized by prominent delusions [a belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary], and hallucinations [false perception of objects or events involving the senses]) in the the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 15). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 15's MDS not accurately reflecting Resident 15's clinical status, and had the potential to impact care planning, quality measures, and resource allocation for Resident 15. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 12/26/2023, and re-admitted the resident on 6/1/2024, with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the bladder/urinary tract),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care to prevent aspiration (when something swallowed enters the airway or lungs) and/or choking (blockage of the upper airway by food or other objects) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 32) who was assessed as being at risk for aspiration and choking. This deficient practice had the potential to result in aspiration and/or choking for Resident 32. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 32 on 1/22/2016, with diagnoses that included mood affective disorder (mental health condition that affects a person's emotional state), dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 32's Change of Condition (COC) dated 4/5/2025, timed at 12:30 PM, the COC indicated Resident 32 was noted with delayed swallowing with episodes of coughing on liquids. The COC indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 24) who spoke primarily Mandarin had a communication board at bedside. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 24 having unmet needs and emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 24 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including osteoporosis (condition that weakens bones, making them more prone to fractures) and chronic pulmonary edema (condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs over an extended period.) The AR further indicated Resident 24's primary language was Chinese (Mandarin). During a review of Resident 24's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/4/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 24 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/5/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 24 required partial or moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain its infection prevention and control program, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2), as indicated by the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions The facility failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) while providing care and having direct physical contact with Resident 2 who was under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an approach that entails the use of PPE to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organism [MDRO, bacteria that are resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobial drugs]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the transmission of infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for Resident 2 and other residents residing at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 11/28/2003, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (the Department), the Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement, within two hours, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised March 2023. This failure resulted in a delay in notification to the Department and had the potential to result in Resident 1 to be subjected to abuse while at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/14/2022 and readmitted Resident 1 on 3/29/2025 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and unsteadiness of feet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure two of 13 sampled staff understood the facility's Policies and Procedures (P&P) regarding abuse reporting by failing to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 knew who the facility's Abuse Coordinator (a designated staff member for overseeing and coordinating the facility's efforts to prevent resident abuse) was. 2. Ensure Registered Nurse (RN) 1 knew which agencies needed to be notified about allegations of resident abuse. RN 1 did not know that all allegations of abuse must be reported to the California Department of Public Health (the Department), the Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement within two hours. This failure had the potential to result in residents (in general) to be subject to abuse while residing at the facility. (Cross reference F609) Findings: During a telephone interview on 4/8/2025 at 1:38 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated CNA 1 did not remember if CNA 1 received training from the facility regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, License, Certification, and Registration of Personnel, and job description (JD) titled, Director of Staffing Development (DSD- a licensed Registered Nurse [RN] or Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN- a nurse who provides direct nursing care for people who are sick, injured, convalescent, or disabled] who is approved by the Department), for one of 15 sampled staff (previous DSD/office assistant [OA]) by failing to: Ensure that the OA did not work without a license to practice nursing from [DATE] to [DATE] while providing care to nine of nine sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) and working under the title DSD. As a result of this failure, on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] the OA continued to work without a license while in a nursing role as the DSD, and administered medications and provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 33 and Resident 57) and/or their representatives were provided information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive (AD, legal documents that provided instructions for medical care and only went into effect if a person cannot communicate his/her own wishes). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 33 and Resident 57 and/or their representative to receive unwanted care and treatment and/or unnecessary life-sustaining treatment. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 33 to the facility on 7/31/2019, and re-admitted Resident 33 on 8/12/2022, with diagnosis that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), abnormal posture, and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). The AR indicated the facility listed Family Member (FM) 1 as Resident 33's emergency contact. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) was accurate for two of three sampled residents (Residents 7 and 8) a. Resident 7's MDS did not indicate Resident 7 had the active diagnosis of schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). b. Resident 8's MDS did not indicate Resident 8 had active diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood). These failures had the potential for Residents 7 and 8 not to receive appropriate treatment and/or services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 7 was admitted to facility on 2/11/20 with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications (medications that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 64) according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022. This failure had the potential for Resident 64 to experience a decline in health and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic [long standing] condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). During a review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow safe and proper food storage practices, in one of one kitchen (Kitchen 1), in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to label/date food items in the kitchen. This deficient practice could result in serious complications from food borne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverage) and/or affect the quality and palatability of food to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/29/24, at 8:34 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) during the initial tour of Kitchen 1, the following were observed: 1. one undated/unlabeled 16 oz (ounces, a unit of weight) can of Sprease brand of all-purpose oil-based spray with no cap on and located on the counter by the stove. 2. 5 unlabeled/unmarked sealed plain plastic packages of multiple frozen waffles were inside the stand alone freezer. The DM stated, the opened oil spray can should have a cover on and should have been labeled for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), for food items in one of one refrigerator (Refrigerator 1), that indicated labeling food brought into the facility by family and visitors for residents, with the resident's name, the item, and the use by date when, 1. Staff did not know when to discard food brought in by family and other visitors. 2. Staff did not know who was responsible for checking Refrigerator 1 located in the South Station and determine when foods were to be discarded. These failures had the potential for residents to eat spoiled foods and develop foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/1/2024 at 1:10 pm with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), LVN 2 stated, When family brings food in, we let them know we can only keep food for 24 hours. LVN 2 stated the only refrigerator used to store residents' food was in the South Station utility room. Refrigerator 1 was observed in the South Station utility room with LVN 2. There was a sealed jar of instant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 59) was treated with dignity by failing to provide privacy while accessing Resident 59's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the belly to bring nutrition and/or medications directly to the stomach) during medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 59's legs and diaper (adult brief) getting exposed and could have resulted in Resident 59 to feel humiliated, embarrassed, and ashamed. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 59 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including encounter for attention to gastrostomy (a surgical procedure used to insert a G-tube), cachexia (a general state of ill health involving great weight loss and muscle loss) and unspecified dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plans for one of one sampled resident (Resident 19). The facility failed to revise Resident 19's care plans for falls regarding the use of bilateral (left and right) floor mats. This deficient practice had the potential for the Resident 19 to not receive proper and consistent care. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 19 to the facility on 4/7/2023, and re-admitted Resident 19 on 10/4/2023, with diagnoses that included blindness, lack of coordination (not able to move different parts of the body together well or easily), unsteadiness (liable to fall, not steady in position) on feet, and dementia (a group of symptoms caused by disorders that affect the brain). During a review of Resident 19's Care Plan (CP) titled, Falling Star Program, revised on 11/14/2023, the CP indicated, Resident 19 was at risk for falls. The CP interventions included floor mats as indicated. During a review of Resident 19's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled discharged (when a resident no longer needs to receive services and is sent home or moved to another facility or location) residents (Resident 102) and Resident 102's family were involved in developing Resident 102's post-discharge plan prior to Resident 102's discharge on [DATE]. This failure had the potential for Resident 102 and Resident 102's family to not have the chance to ask questions regarding Resident 102's placement and post-discharge care which could result in a difficult transition to the post-discharge setting. Findings: During a review of Resident 102's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that interferes with a person's ability to think clearly, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others). During a review of Resident 102's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one staff (Registered Nurse 2, [RN 2]) had specific competencies (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) to communicate with Resident 33, who spoke and communicated in Arabic This deficient practice resulted in RN 2 could not understand Resident 33's needs and had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 33's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 33 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), abnormal posture and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care-screening tool), dated 3/7/24, indicated Resident 33's preferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 55) observed during medication pass (term used to describe the process through which medication is administered [given] to patients) was free of significant medication errors by failing to ensure Resident 55's routinely scheduled medication, Tramadol (a strong opiod [class of drug used to reduce pain] medication used to treat moderate to severe pain that is not being relieved by other types of pain medicines) was administered. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 55's physiological well-being related to poor management of Resident 55's pain and the potential for Resident 55 to experience withdrawal (physical and mental symptoms that occur after stopping or reducing intake of a drug) symptoms. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including idiopathic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 27 out of 37 resident rooms (Rooms 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132 and 133) met the minimum requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measure) per resident in rooms with more than one resident. Seven rooms had two residents per room and twenty rooms had three beds per room. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the rooms were not having enough space for nursing staff to provide resident hygiene care, or the ability to permit the use of resident care devices. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis (CAA), dated 4/30/2025 the CAA indicated the following rooms were less than 80 sq. ft. per resident: Room: No. of Beds: Room Size: Floor Area: 102 3 223.3 sq. ft. 19.4 x 11.3 ft. 5.10 x 0.8 ft. 103 3 227.08 sq. ft. 19.4 x 11.5 ft. 5.10 x 0.8 ft. 104 3 223.3 sq. ft. 19.4 x 11.3 ft. 5.10 x 0.8 ft. 105 3 227.08 sq. ft. 19.4 x 11.5 ft. 5.10 x 0.8 ft. 106 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 27 out of 37 resident rooms (Rooms 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132 and 133) met the minimum requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident rooms. Seven rooms had two residents per room and twenty rooms had three beds per room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in not having enough space for nursing staff to provide resident care, inability to accommodate the resident's functional furniture or care devices, and not enough room for visitors. Findings: During a review of the facility's room waiver request letter, dated 2/12/2024, the letter indicated the purpose being an official request for a room waiver. The letter indicated there were no unnecessary pieces of furniture or devices that could cause congestion and indicated the floor areas were open and passable without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,361 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,361 — penalty dated 2025-05-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| KLAVAN, RACHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| LEHMANN, LIBBY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| NOTIS, SHMUEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| KLAVAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/1986 |
| CHINO HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| PERVAIZ, ZAID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $592K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055126. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.