No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Green Acres Healthcare Center

8101 E Hill Drive, Rosemead, CA 91770 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (626) 280-2293 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 280-2293 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)$57,016 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,016 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-09)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1168 San Gabriel Blvd · (626) 288-4741 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2630 San Gabriel Blvd · (626) 572-8255 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8147 Arroyo Dr · (626) 288-5124 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2361 Pine St · (626) 569-2160 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1418 N San Gabriel Blvd · (626) 427-1867

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.8%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.5%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication10.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.0%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.342.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.211.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

8.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.7%CMS range 6.2–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge74.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified18.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.7–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
36.7%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain a complete informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) prior to administration psychotropic medications (medications that affects mood and behavior) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 10, 72, and 82) and keep the consent in the resident's clinical record by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 10's consent for Divalproex Sodium (medication used to stabilize mood) and Olanzapine (a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought]) was signed and dated by the physician who obtained the consent. 2a. Resident 72's informed consent for Haloperidol (medication used to treat schizophrenia ]) Olanzapine and Quetiapine Fumarate (medication to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes a person to experience extreme mood changes) and major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that accurate and current nurse staffing data [total number and actual hours worked by licensed (Registered Nurses [RNs], License Vocational Nurses [LVNs]) and unlicensed nurses (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNAs])] were posted daily at the beginning of each shift (11 PM - 7 AM, 7 AM - 3 PM, and 3 PM - 11 PM). This deficient practice had the potential to delay recognition of inadequate staffing levels, which may lead to delayed response times, unmet resident needs, and decreased supervision, especially for residents requiring assistance with activities of daily living or safety monitoring. Furthermore, this deficient practice had the potential to impede residents, families, and visitors from accurately assessing staffing availability, which may hinder their ability to raise concerns, request assistance, or make informed decisions about the resident's care environment. Findings: Findings: During an observation on 3/10/2026 at 1:34 PM, a Census and Direct Care Service Hours per Patient Day (DHPPD-a CMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored and sealed in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure titled Food Receiving and Storage. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food contamination and the growth of microorganisms that could cause foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent initial kitchen observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 3/10/2026 at 8:35 AM, Refrigerator #1 was observed containing an open plastic container with grape jelly that was not sealed, and a container of preserved fruit cocktail that was not sealed properly. The lid on the preserved fruit cocktail container had a visible crack approximately 1 inch in length. During the same interview, the DS stated she observed the open plastic container with grape jelly that was not sealed and the preserved fruit cocktail container that was not sealed properly. The DS stated the preserved fruit cocktail had to be thrown away because the cracked lid exposed the food to air, which could allow bacteria to enter. The DS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives (ADs-written statements of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, intended to guide care when the individual is unable to communicate) were obtained and accessible in the residents' medical records for two of two sampled residents (Residents 19 and 30). 1.Resident 19 and Resident 30's signed Advance Directive acknowledgment forms were not located in the residents' medical records. 2. Resident 30's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-medical order forms that direct medical staff regarding treatment preferences during a medical emergency when the individual cannot speak for themselves) were not completed in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents' medical treatment preferences from being carried out during emergency situations and/or when a resident was incapacitated (unable to participate meaningfully in medical decision making). Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed record review, the facility failed to ensure the required Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge (a written notification to the resident or responsible party (RP) that included the reason for the transfer or discharge) was sent to the Long Term Care Ombudsman ( an state agency that advocates for the residents) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 91). The facility did not inform or email the Ombudsman office when Resident 91 was discharged from the facility, This deficient practice violated the resident's rights to have the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes and assisted living facilities) to advocate for Resident 91's transfer or discharge home. Findings: During a review of Resident 91's admission Record (AC), the AC indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term lung condition that makes it progressively harder to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sample residents (Resident 90) was provided with care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Implement the Discharge Summary instructions from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1, dated 12/25/2025 to follow up with the outpatient cardiology to consider resuming beta blocker (medications that decrease heart rate and blood pressure) given Resident 90 had episodes of bradycardia (slow heart rate less than 60 beats per minute) and for placement of Zio Patch monitor (a water-resistant monitor applied to the upper left chest allowing continuous heart rhythm [heart electrical activity measuring the heart rate and any abnormal activity] monitoring with optional symptom logging monitor) 2. Implement interventions for Resident 90's complex medical history related to Coronary Artery Disease (CAD, plaque buildup in arteries [long tubes that transport oxygen and blood to the body]) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than five (5) percent (%) during medication pass by committing two (2) medication errors on one of five sampled residents (Resident 8) during medication observation with 29 medication opportunities that resulted in a 6.9% medication error rate. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reactions (undesired effect of a drug or other type of treatment), ineffective treatment, worsening of the resident's condition, or potentially serious harm, injury, or death. Exceeding the acceptable error rate indicates a systemic issue in safe medication administration. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AC), the AC indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (blood sugar levels in the blood are higher than normal) and hyperlipidemia (a condition where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired prior to administration for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (Resident 83). An observation of the locked medication refrigerator revealed an expired ABH gel (a compounded topical medication containing Ativan [medication for anxiety], Benadryl [antihistamine], and Haldol [antipsychotic medication]) 1mg-25mg-1mg/1ml with an expiration date of 2/25/2026. Record review indicated the expired medication was administered to Resident 83 seven times over a five day period. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 83 and other residents receiving medications from improperly monitored storage. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia and mood disorder. During a review of Resident 83's History and Physical (H&P), signed and dated 12/18/2025, the H&P indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the two refrigerators (located in the temporary food storage room at nearby facility) temperatures were monitored and documented before and between meal service activities for stable temperatures. This deficient practice placed the facility residents at risk for foodborne illness an (illness that comes from eating contaminated food) due to inconsistent refrigerator temperature monitoring and documentation. Findings: During a follow up kitchen tour on 2/6/25 at 12PM with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) in the temporary food storage room located outside the kitchen, three (3) refrigerators and one (1) freezer were observed in this storage room. Each was observed with one thermometer inside. A Refrigerator and Freezer Temperature Log for February 2025 was observed hanging on the door. The log for 2/4/25 PM through 2/6/25 for Refrigerator 2 was blank. The log for Refrigerator 3 and Freezer was blank from 2/4/25 through 2/6/25. During an interview with on 2/6/25 at 12:10 PM, the DDS stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options for four of four sampled residents (Residents 37, 12, 69 and 14) by failing to: 1. Obtain an informed consent for psychotropic/psychotherapeutic (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications for Resident 37, who was prescribed Quetiapine (medication used to treat a mental illness that causes disturbed or unusual thinking, loss of interest in life, and strong or inappropriate emotions) for schizophrenia, and Divalproex Sodium (medication used to treat mental/mood conditions) for mood disorder. 2. Ensure the residents, or the responsible party was informed about the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Resident 12, 69 and 14. This deficient practice had violated resident rights to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality of two of four sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 226) when: 1. Resident 3's suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from your bladder by being inserted through a small incision made in your lower abdomen, just above your pubic bone) urinary bag (urine drainage bag to collect urine) was observed without a urinary catheter bag cover. 2. Resident 226 who was hard of hearing (HOH) and spoke a foreign language that the facility staffs could not understand, and the resident could not understand the common language in the facility was not accurately assessed and provided the proper means of communicating with the staffs and residents. These deficient practices violated the resident's rights to maintain privacy, enhanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on Advance Directive (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) by failing to ensure the Advance Directive was offered and explained and the signed AD was in the chart for two of four sampled residents (Residents 14 and 39). This deficient practice has the potential to omit the residents ' medical decisions if they become incapacitated (unable to make decision for self) leading to unnecessary or unwanted treatments due to lack of clear instructions regarding their end-of-life care. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident 14 on 11/15/2024 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) and schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 226 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 226 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Unspecified abnormalities of Gait and Mobility (changes to the way a person walks or moves due to injuries, medical conditions, or other reasons.) During a review of Resident 226 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 10/1/24, indicated Resident 226 was severely cognitively impaired (a condition that makes it very difficult for a person to think, learn, and remember). The MDS also indicated Resident 226 had moderate difficulty in hearing. During a review of Resident's 226's Care Plan dated 1/10/25, indicated Resident 226 was at risk of having needs unmet related to difficulty in communication secondary to hard of hearing and spoke a foreign language. 1. Resident will be able to relate to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 226) who was not assisted by the facility in arranging a referral for audiologist (a physician specialized in hearing loss) consult. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of services and Resident 226 not being able to hear adequately while communicating with staffs. Findings: During an observation on 2/4/25 at 8:33 AM, Resident 226 was observed alert, lying in bed, with a raised voice speaking to a laboratory staff, who also had to raise volume for Resident 226 to hear the resident. Resident 226 also pulled out pieces of paper and requested to communicate in writing. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 9:31 AM, Resident 226 stated she has hard of hearing (HOH), has no device, to assist her with the difficulty hearing whatever the staffs say to her. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/25 at 9:15 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI-when bacteria gets into your urine and travels up to your bladder), in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) on Infection Prevention and Control Program. 1. On 2/4/2025, Resident 3 was observed while sitting on his wheelchair, Resident 3's suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from your bladder by being inserted through a small incision made in your lower abdomen, just above your pubic bone) drainage bag (urine drainage bag to collect urine) was hanging on the wheelchair ' s left arm rest (positioned higher than Resident 3's bladder). 2. On 2/5/2025, Resident 3 was observed with the suprapubic catheter tubing wrapped around his left leg while sitting on his wheelchair. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 3 to have recurrent urinary tract infection and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on behavioral health services by failing to provide one of two sampled residents (Resident 9) a referal to psychiatrist (a physician specialized in mental and behavioral health) consultation evaluation for aggressive behavior towards the staff and residents to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice had the potential to worsen the mental health symptoms of the resident, increase risk of relapse, decrease quality of life, and increase the likelihood of needing more intensive interventions like hospitalization in the future. Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 9 on 2/27/2012 and readmitted the resident on 1/14/2025 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought and false belief of reality). A review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 1/17/2025, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent (%) during medication pass by committing four (4) medication errors on one of six sampled residents (Resident 15) during medication observation with 29 medication opportunity that resulted to a 13.79% medication error rate. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reaction) undesired effect of a drug or other type of treatment) to the medications that could jeopardize the safety of the residents that could lead to serious harm, injury, or death. Findings: A review of Resident 15's admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 15 on 4/3/2024 and readmitted the resident on 10/9/2024 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) and schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought). A review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on how to properly and safely store medications and biologicals by failing to separately store Hydrogen Peroxide Topical Solution (an external [outside the body] medication with mild antiseptic used on the skin to prevent infection of minor cuts, scrapes, and burns) on the same shelf with oral (medications given by mouth) medications such as stool softeners and vitamins. This deficient practice had the potential to cause medication errors and expose residents to adverse reactions (an undesired harmful effect) that could lead to serious harm or death. Findings: During an inspection of the facility's East Wing medication storage room with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 3 on 2/6/2025 at 10:05 AM, a bottle of Hydrogen Peroxide Topical Solution, an external (applied outside the body) medication used on the skin to prevent infection of minor cuts, scrapes, and burns, was observed on the same shelf where oral medications were kept. During a concurrent interview with LVN 3, LVN 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in preventing, controlling infections and communicable diseases were in place, when one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) according to the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. Resident 3 who was on an enhance barrier precaution (EBP) (taking extra steps to prevent the spread of serious infections, like using gowns and gloves) due to a suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from your bladder by being inserted through a small incision made in your lower abdomen, just above your pubic bone) was observed receiving high contact care (fixing Resident 3 ' s suprapubic catheter tubing and urine drainage bag) from Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1). LVN 1 and CNA 1 failed to use an isolation gown as part of their PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and proceeded to the Nurses Station without performing hand hygiene (a way of cleaning the hands, which can prevent the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency skills as staff were not following the manufacturer ' s guidelines when checking the concentration of the dish machine chlorine (a chemical used for disinfection) solution. This failure had a potential to result to potential cross-contamination (a transfer of bacteria from one object to another), ineffective dish machine, and unsanitized dishes that could lead to food borne illness (an illness caused by contaminated food and beverages) in 82 of 82 medically compromised residents who received food and ice from the kitchen. Findings: During an interview with the Diet Aide (DA) 1 on 2/8/2024 at 12:27 PM, DA 1 stated he washed trays and pitchers in a low temperature dish machine in Facililty 2 ' s kitchen. DA 1 stated he checked the dish machine temperatures for wash and rinse and the wash temperature should be at 140 degrees Fahrenheit (°F, unit of measurement) and rinse temperature should be at 135°F. DA 1 stated he also checked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the correct texture for puree and soft mechanical diets when: a. Five (5) of 5 residents on soft mechanical diet did not receive ground sausage links and sausage was dry. b. Six (6) of 6 residents on puree diet received oatmeal that was not pureed in texture and consistency. This deficient practice had the potential to cause difficulty in eating, chewing, and swallowing causing a decrease food intake resulting to weight loss. Findings: During an observation of tray line (assembly area for resident ' s food) breakfast service in Facility 2 ' s kitchen on 2/7/2024 at 7:22 AM, the oatmeal for puree diet had lumps, oatmeal residue and was not pureed in consistency. During a test tray (a sample tray to evaluate taste, appearance and palatability of food) of puree diet (a diet with smooth pudding like consistency food) with Dietary Supervisor 1 (DS 1) and Registered Dietitian 1 (RD 1) on 2/7/2024 at 7:42 AM, the puree diet tray included puree waffles covered with thick brown syrup, puree sausage with thick…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary condition to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in Facility 1 ' s kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure Facility 1 ' s Kitchen was maintained to prevent the subfloor from being completely rotten, and tile from disrepair due to having an old rotten floor, the dishwasher left rusted, and the wooden entrance door frames throughout the kitchen worn out and deteriorating as reported by the local Health Department on 12/14/2023. As a result, Facility 1 was required to start construction renovation to their kitchen on 1/29/2024. The facility did not develop plan on how to maintain food safety for the residents during a construction of the kitchen to ensure the food products being transported from the facility were kept dry and covered to prevent contamination and stored in sanitary condition. 2. Ensure not to store dry food in the dry storage area or store perishable foods (foods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 11 out of 81 residents (Residents 12, 15, 20, 28, 30, 39, 42, 47, 63, 69 and 71), who were assessed at being at risk for falling, staff and visitors by failing to: 1. Ensure that the facility's roof was free from cracks, holes and other damage that allowed water from rain to penetrate through and drip into the space between the roof and ceiling. 2. Ensure that the ceiling structure inside the building did not become damaged from rainwater leaking in through holes, cracks, and other damage to the roof. 3. Maintain the ceiling structure free from moisture, water damage, active leaking, and degradation due to rainwater penetrating through cracks, holes, or other damaged areas of the roof. 4. Provide documented evidence that the facility routinely performs scheduled maintenance service to all areas in the facility that included the roof inspections. These deficient practices resulted in an outburst of 5 water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide call lights to call for assistance from 2/6/2024 to 2/9/2024 for five (Resident 15, 39, 68, 69, and 78) out of six residents who experienced a temporary room change due to ceiling leaks, in accordance with their care plans. This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 15, 39, 68, 69, and 78 from asking assistance especially during emergency situations, and not receiving necessary care and services, which could negatively affect the residents ' physical comfort and psychosocial well-being. Cross reference F921 Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 15 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 15 on 2/14/2022 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility (ability to move), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one ' s daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe room temperature levels between 71 to 81-degree Fahrenheit (° F, unit of measurement) in the resident's rooms as required by the Federal regulation for five out of 17 residents (Resident 40, 49, 12, 47, and 30). This deficient practice resulted in the resident's increased level of discomfort and the potential to result in loss of body heat that could negatively impact the resident's quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 40 on 6/2/2015 and readmitted her on 7/27/2020 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 12/11/2023, indicated Resident 40 had intact memory and cognition (ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse (intentional causing of harm or injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental suffering; includes verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse) to the facility ' s abuse coordinator between two residents (Resident 43 and Resident 51) out of a census of 81 residents on 2/8/2024 in accordance with the facility ' s policy on Abuse Allegation Reporting. This failure had the potential to under report alleged cases of abuse, which could lead to a failure to investigate alleged abuse in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 51 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 51 on 11/10/2023 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility (ability to move), dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] for two of six sampled residents (Resident 4 and 24) with limited ROM. 1. For Resident 24, the facility failed to include any assessment of Resident 24 ' s actual ROM in both arms and both legs for a quarterly Joint Mobility Screen (brief assessment of a resident's range of motion in both arms and both legs), dated 2/6/2024, which included a conclusion statement that indicated Resident 24 did not have any decline in ROM. This failure resulted in the inaccurate assessment and transmission of Resident 24 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment used as a care planning tool) assessment, dated 1/25/2024, for ROM limitations. 2. For Resident 4, the MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 4 did not have any functional ROM limitations in both arms. The OT Evaluation, dated 5/29/2023, indicated Resident 4 had contractures in both arms and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] and mobility for three (Resident 15, Resident 62, and Resident 24) of six sampled residents with positioning and mobility (ability to move) concerns. 1. For Resident 15 and 62, the facility failed to use a front-wheeled walker (FWW, an assistive device with two front wheels used for stability when walking) in accordance with the Physical Therapy (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) recommendations and physician orders. The facility also failed to specify the distance for Resident 15 and 62 to walk to maintain their mobility after discharge from PT services. 2. For Resident 24, the facility failed to apply splints (material used to restrict, protect, or immobilize a part of the body to support function, assist and/or increase range of motion) to both knees in accordance with the PT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply bed brakes and repair wheelchair brakes for one (Resident 15) of six sampled residents with positioning and mobility (ability to move) concerns. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 15, who was assessed as a high risk for fall, to fall from both the bed and the wheelchair, placing Resident 15 at increased risk for physical injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 15 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 15 on 2/14/2022 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one ' s daily activities), and schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior). During a review of Resident 15 ' s Fall Risk Assessment, dated 9/6/2023, the Fall Risk Assessment indicated Resident 15 was at high risk for falls. During a review of Resident 15 ' s care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) and target behaviors (behaviors related to a diagnoses of mental illness) of restlessness and aggression related to the use of lorazepam (a medication used to treat mental illness) between 2/6/24 and 2/8/24 in one of five sampled residents (Resident 62.) This deficient practice of failing to monitor for adverse effects and target behaviors increased the risk Resident 62 could have experienced adverse effects related to her psychotropic medication (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) therapy possibly leading to impairment or decline in her mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. Findings: A review of Resident 62 ' s admission Record (a document containing a resident ' s demographic and diagnostic information), dated 2/8/24, indicated Resident 62 was initially admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Three medication errors out of 29 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 10.34 % affecting two of nine residents observed for medication administration (Residents 11 and 483). The medication errors noted were as follows: Omitted or late administration of vitamin C (a vitamin supplement) 500 milligrams (mg - a unit of measure for mass) for Resident 11. Omitted or late administration of zinc sulfate (a vitamin supplement) 220 mg for Resident 11. Attempted administration of one dose of expired insulin aspart (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) prior to surveyor intervention for Resident 483. The deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with the physician ' s orders and professional standards of practice increased the risk that Residents 11 and 483 may have experienced medical complications possibly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved flavor and appearance. Pureed sausage was served with sweet syrup, puree waffle was drenched with syrup and oatmeal had lumps. This deficient practice placed 6 of 92 facility residents at risk of unplanned weight loss, a consequence of poor food intake, getting food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation of trayline (a place for resident ' s tray assembly) breakfast service in Facility 2 ' s kitchen on 2/7/2024 at 7:19 AM, puree diet trays received puree waffle that was drenched with syrup and puree sausage links had syrup. A review of Facility 1 ' s menu titled Winter Menus, dated 2/7/2024, indicated Pureed diet included the following food: Orange juice 4 ounces (oz, a unit of measurement) Puree oatmeal ¾ cup (c., a unit of measurement) Puree sausage #24 scoop (1.35 oz) Puree waffle ½ c Margarine 1 teaspoon (tsp, unit of measurement) Syrup 1 oz Milk 1 c During a test tray (a sample tray to evaluate taste, appearance, and palatability of food) of puree diet (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide lunch at the facility ' s established mealtime on 2/6/2024 and served lunch to residents in the facility ' s East Wing at least 30 minutes late. This deficient practice caused three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 12, 62 and 68) for dining observation to feel hungry and agitated. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 62 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 62 on 8/1/2023 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility (ability to move), dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), cerebral infarction (brain damage due to a loss of oxygen to the area), and legal blindness. During a review of Resident 62 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment and care planning tool), dated 11/10/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 62 had severely impaired cognition (ability to think,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately reflect the amount of time the facility provided Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services on 2/7/2024 to three of six sampled residents (Resident 62, 15, and 26) with positioning and mobility (ability to move) concerns. This failure resulted in the inaccurate records for the provision of RNA services to Residents 62, 15, and 26. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 62 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 62 on 8/1/2023 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), cerebral infarction (brain damage due to a loss of oxygen to the area), and legal blindness. During a review of Resident 62 ' s physician orders, dated 10/1/2023, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Residents 24, 49, 68) were competent in understanding the terms of the facility ' s binding arbitration agreement (an agreement that allows parties to resolve disputes and lawsuits privately rather than going to the court). This failure had the potential for Resident 24, 49, 68 to not understand their rights for a binding arbitration agreement. Findings: During a review of Resident 24 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/20/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 24 does not have the capacity (the ability to make a rational decision based upon all relevant facts and considerations) to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 24 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/22/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 24 was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, but not limited to, major depressive disorder (mental health illness causes a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement, monitor, and evaluate identified Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI, a program that is focused on action plan to correct identified quality deficiencies (a deviation in performance resulting in an actual or potential undesirable outcome, or an opportunity for improvement) relating to building maintenance and safety. The facility failed to: 1. Documented evidence the QAPI program implemented a plan to maintain the kitchen in good working condition and ensure the safe renovation of the kitchen, including a plan for providing meals to residents while the kitchen is closed. 2. Document evidence that the QAPI program implemented a plan to ensure the maintenance of the buildings roofing were maintained to prevent leaks and protect residents from a hazardous situation. These deficient practices resulted in leaking of the roof into 3 facility rooms and a hallway resulting in eleven residents (Residents 12, 15, 20, 28, 30,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to disinfect shared equipments for four sampled residents (Resident 52, 57, 15, and 26) out of of 15 residents observed for medication administration and position and mobility (ability to move) concerns. 1. Two (Residents 52 and 57) of nine residents observed for medication administration, the facility failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff (material placed around a person ' s arm and then inflated to measure blood pressure) before and after use. 2. Two of six residents (Resident 15 and 26) observed for positioning and mobility concerns, the facility failed to disinfect a vinyl (type of nonporous material) gait belt (assistive device placed around a person ' s waist to assist with safe transferring between surfaces or while walking) before and after resident use. These failures had the potential to spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in the [NAME] Wing Nursing Station on 2/7/23 at 8:18 AM, LVN 1 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist one of two sampled resident ' s representative (Resident 49) in formulating an Advance Directives (AD-a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor). This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict with Resident 49's wishes regarding health care treatment especially in an event of emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 49 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 49 on 8/26/23 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 49 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/28/23, indicated Resident 49 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 49 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 12/4/23, indicated Resident 49 had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: Create a comprehensive care plan for the use of lorazepam (a medication used to treat mental illness) to treat behaviors of restlessness and aggression in one of five sampled residents (Resident 62). Create a comprehensive care plan for the use of lorazepam to treat behaviors of increased agitation, yelling, and screaming toward other and staff in accordance with the facility policy for one of five sampled residents (Resident 70). This deficient practice of failing to create comprehensive, resident-specific care plans related to the use of psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) increased the risk that Resident 62 and 70 ' s use of psychotropic medications would not be periodically reevaluated as intended. This increased the risk that Residents 62 and 70 may have experienced adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 51). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 51 ' s provision of care and services while residing in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 51 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 51 on 11/10/2023, with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility (ability to move), dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), and cerebral infarction (brain damage due to a loss of oxygen to the area). During a review of Resident 51 ' s care plan for self-care deficit (difficulty performing self-care tasks like bathing, dressing, grooming), revised on 11/27/2023, the care plan interventions included for the facility to provide Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have more than one staff to provide Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services out of 12 residents who were supposed to receive RNA services on 2/7/2024. RNA 1 was unable to provide RNA services to three (Resident 6, 24, and 61) of 12 residents on 2/7/2024, because RNA 1 was assigned to supervise multiple residents out in the facility ' s patio on 2/7/2024. On 2/8/2024, RNA 1 was assigned as a Certified Nurse Assistant assigned to perform resident care and was not able to provide RNA services to the 12 residents requiring RNA. On 2/9/2024, the facility failed to provide RNA services to the 12 residents requiring RNA because RNA 1 did not report to work. This failure had the potential for the residents with physician orders for RNA to experience a decline in range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] and mobility (ability to move). Findings: During a review of the facility ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to a recommendation from November 2023 to justify prolonged use of pantoprazole (a medication used to reduce stomach acid) in one of five sampled residents (Resident 62). This deficient practice of failing to ensure the physician evaluated and responded to medication irregularities (potential issues with a resident ' s medication regimen) identified by the faciliity ' s consultant pharmacist during the Medication Regimen Review (MRR – a monthly report from the consultant pharmacist identifying any medication irregularities in a resident ' s current medication regimen) increased the risk that Resident 62 could have experienced adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to medication therapy possibly leading to decline in mental or physical condition or psychosocial status. Findings: A review of Resident 62 ' s admission Record (a document containing a resident demographic and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 70) was free of unnecessary medications. Resident 70 was ordered for psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind and behavior) with an inadequate indication of use for Seroquel (a medication used to treat mental illness) to treat psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) without adequate indication for use and the resident's manifestations of behavior of constant worrying was not monitored. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 70 at risk for unrecognized adverse reactions associated with the use of psychotropic drug. Findings: A review of Resident 70's admission Record indicated Resident 70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a mental condition characterized by intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), dementia (a medical condition characterized by a decline in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors by attempting to administer one dose of expired insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) prior to surveyor intervention for one of nine residents observed for medication administration (Resident 483.) This deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with professional standards of practice increased the risk that Resident 483 may have experienced medical complications from ineffective insulin possibly resulting in hospitalization. Cross-referenced F759 Findings: A review of Resident 483 ' s admission Record (a document containing a resident ' s demographic and diagnostic information, dated [DATE], indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a medical condition characterized by the body ' s inability to regulate blood sugar levels.) A review of Resident 483 ' s Order Summary Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: Ensure unopened insulin (a medication used to control high blood sugar) was stored in the refrigerator per the manufacturer ' s requirements affecting Resident 483 in one out of two medication carts (East Wing Medication Cart). Remove expired insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) from the medication cart affecting Resident 483 in one out of two inspected medication carts (East Wing Medication Cart). These deficient practices of failing to store medications per the manufacturers ' requirements and remove expired medications from the medication carts increased the risk that Resident 483 could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications resulting in hospitalization or death. Findings: A review of Resident 483 ' s admission Record (a document containing a resident ' s demographic and diagnostic information, dated 2/9/24, indicated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0907 — isolated
    Provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one seated leg bicycles in the Rehabilitation Room was functioning properly, including during use for one of 13 residents (Resident 43) receiving Physical Therapy (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) services. Findings: During a review of Resident 43 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 43 on 1/17/2024 with diagnoses including Parkinson ' s disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements and difficulty with balance and coordination), encephalopathy (disease that affects the brain, causing changes in its function), muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility (ability to move), and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one ' s daily activities). During a review of Resident 43 ' s PT Evaluation and Plan of Treatment, dated 1/18/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) in accordance the facility's policy and procedure titled Procedure for Prevention of Resident abuse and mistreatment by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 2 with diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition characterized by hallucinations [false perceptions of sensory experiences] or delusions [a false belief or judgment about external reality]), manifested by believing other people are against him and causing outburst of anger was monitored and supervised to prevent Resident 2 from entering Resident 1's room who was watching TV and pounded on Resident 1's head without a staff to stop Resident 2 from entering Resident 1's room. 2. Resident 2's clinical history from the GACH (General Acute Care Hospital)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and provide the necessary behavioral health care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) with diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, behaves and experience psychosis [behavioral symptoms that affect the mind, and loss of contact with reality]) manifested by history of increase agitation, aggressive behavior toward staff, and paranoid delusion (profound fear and loss of the ability to tell what's real and what's not real) believing other people are against him causing outburst of anger as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not appropriately assess and monitor Resident 2's aggressive behaviors. 2. Administer Ativan (medication used to relieved anxiety [fear of the unknown]) and Haldol (a medication used to control mood and behavior) as ordered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 40 resident rooms (Rooms 6, 15. and 26) did not accommodate more than four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents in the room due to inadequate space for resident care, mobility, and privacy of the residents. Findings: On 2/4/2024, the Administrator (ADM) submitted a written room waiver request for three resident rooms, which had five resident beds in each room. A review of the letter for room waiver indicated the following: Room # Number of beds square feet (sq. ft) 6 5 332.5 sq. ft 15 5 441 sq. ft 26 5 496 sq. ft A review of the room waiver request indicated the residents' needs were accommodated and there were no adverse effects (undesired outcome) to the health, safety, and welfare to the residents occupying these rooms. The maximum number of beds allowed in a multiple resident bedroom should be no more than four beds per room. During a tour of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident ' s bedrooms measure at least 100 square feet (sq. ft) per resident in a single resident room or measure at least 80 sq. ft. In multiple resident's room for four of 12 single rooms (Rooms 4, 5, 16 and 17). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of care, health and safety of the residents in the room due to inadequate space for resident care, mobility, and privacy of the resident. Findings: On 2/4/2025, the Administrator submitted a written room waiver request for four single bedrooms, which Included the square footage of each room. A review of the waiver letter Indicated the following: Room # # Beds square feet (sq. ft.) 4 1 76.00 sq. ft. 5 1 76.00 sq. ft. 16 1 99.75 sq. ft. 17 1 99.75 sq. ft. A review of the facility's document titled Client Accommodation Analysis (a form that indicate the room sizes in the facility, with room size measurement), indicated Rooms 4,5,16, and 17, did not meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0913 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that have direct access to an exit hallway.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation. interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure four of 40 resident's bedrooms (Rooms 4, 5, 16, and 17) had direct access to the exit corridor without passing through another resident's bedroom. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the privacy, health and safety of the residents in the room due lack of direct access to an exit during an emergency. Findings: During tour of the facility on 2/7/2025 at 11:05 AM, Rooms 4, 5, 16, and 17 did not have direct access into an exit corridor. Residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had to enter room [ROOM NUMBER], and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] to get to the nearest exit corridor. During an observation on 2/7/2025 the residents in Rooms 4, 5, 16 and 17 were ambulatory (able to walk without a device or assistance). The nursing staff had to pass through access rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] through room [ROOM NUMBER] and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] through room [ROOM NUMBER], to provide treatments, administer medications, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 40 resident rooms (Rooms 6, 15. and 26) did not accommodate more than four residents per room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents in the room due to inadequate space for resident care, mobility, and privacy of the residents. Findings: On 2/6/2024, the Administrator (ADM) submitted a written room waiver request for three resident rooms, which had five resident beds in each room. A review of the letter for room waiver indicated the following: Room number # of Beds Square feet (sq. ft) 6 5 513.00 15 5 400.00 26 5 412.00 The room waiver request indicated the residents' needs were accommodated and there were no adverse effects (undesired outcome) to the health, safety, and welfare to the residents occupying these rooms. The maximum number of beds allowed in a multiple resident bedroom should be no more than four beds per room. During the initial tour of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms measure at least 100 square feet (sq. ft) per resident in a single resident room for four of 12 single rooms (Rooms 4, 5, 16 and 17). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents in the room due to inadequate space for resident care, mobility, and privacy of the resident. Findings: On 2/6/2024, the Administrator submitted a written room waiver request for four single bedrooms, which Included the square footage of each room. A review of the waiver letter Indicated the following: Room # # Beds Sq. Ft 4 1 74.40 5 1 74.40 16 1 67.89 17 1 67.89 A record review of Client Accommodation Analysis (a form that indicate the room sizes in the facility) with room size measurement, indicated Rooms 4,5 16, and 17, that did not meet the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services- a federal agency) requirement to ensure the residents had 80 sq. ft per resident areas. During an observation on 2/9/2024 at 2:45 PM, the room sizes did not affect the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0913 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that have direct access to an exit hallway.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation. interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure four of 40 resident's bedrooms (Rooms 4, 5, 16, and 17) were accessible from the corridor without passing through another resident's bedroom. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents in the room due lack of direct access to an exit during an emergency. Findings: During Initial tour of the facility on 2/6/2024 at 9AM, Rooms 4, 5, 16, and 17 did not have direct access into a corridor. Residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had to enter room [ROOM NUMBER], and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] to get to the nearest exit corridor. During an observation on 2/9/2024 the residents in Rooms 4, 5, 16 and 17 were ambulatory. The nursing staff had to access rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] through room [ROOM NUMBER] and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] through room [ROOM NUMBER], to provide treatment, administer medications, and assist with residents' individual routine care and activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,016 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $57,016 — penalty dated 2024-02-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-12 for 24 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.3-2.3 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 5California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 5Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 5Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 5Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 5Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 5Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Highland Springs Care CenterBeaumont, CA 2 of 5Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Santa Fe LodgeEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 3 of 5Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 5 of 5Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Pico Rivera Healthcare CenterPico Rivera, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JRB INVESTMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 06/30/2023
IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
FRIEDMAN, IRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
DE CASTRO, MARTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2023
KLAVAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/1986
ORQUIA, JOEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/04/2021
XU, JUNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/07/2018
LEHMANN, LIBBYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2025
NOTIS, SHMUELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2025
PERVAIZ, ZAIDIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
GSS INVESTMENTS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

20 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$818K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 21%Other / private 3%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $818K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$307per resident / day
operating cost
$9,341per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555755. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next