Meadows Ridge Care Center
1700 E Washington St, Colton, CA 92324 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (909) 824-1530 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,032 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-22)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.13 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.85 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.5–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.2–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-07-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medication was administered in accordance with the physician's orders for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had an order to received Phenytoin (medication for seizures - a sudden movement of electrical activity in the brain causing shaking of the limbs and stiffening of the body) and was not administered from June 7, 2026, to June 17, 2026 (a total of 19 doses). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being transferred to an acute care hospital after experiencing seizure activity. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (contains medical and demographic information), the Face Sheet, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes repeated seizures), hemiplegia (complete loss of movement on one side of the body), hemiparesis ( muscle weakness on entire side of the body) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure).During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of destroyed medications when nine (9) medications that were disposed were found with missing witness signature from the second licensed nurse for one of one sampled Medication Disposition Record/Pass Log (document used to record the destruction of a medication for tracking purposes). This failure had the potential to have prescription medication available for staff use.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on January 28, at 12:09 PM, with the DON and Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor the Medication Disposition Record/Pass Log for month of January was reviewed. The Medication Disposition Record/Pass Log indicated the following:1.nine (9) missing witness signatures of a second licensed nurse.The DON and RN Supervisor acknowledged the medication disposition record/pass log was not complete due to the missing witness signatures of a second license nurse.During a concurrent interview and record review on January 28, 2025, at 12:49 PM, with the DON facility's Policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food safety practices to prevent foodborne illness when:1a. There were three clean dishes found to have green and brown food debris, brown grease buildup, remnants of lettuce leaf, and crumbs inside it, when stored under a food prep table in the kitchen.1b. A storage shelf under a food prep table had a white dried substance and greasy black substance with food crumbs on it where clean dishware was kept.2. Eight (8) plastic cups containing a white colored liquid which resembled milk were found in the refrigerator with no date label. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination and foodborne illness to a population of 84 medically compromised residents who reside in the facility.Findings: 1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on January 26, 2026, at 8:30 AM, inside the facility's kitchen, with Consultant Registered Dietician 1 (CRD 1), there were three aluminum dishes found on a shelf under a food prep table which had green and brown food debris,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper and safe infection control practices were followed when:1. Resident 7's oxygen nasal cannula tubing (device used to deliver oxygen into the nose via a tube) was found unlabeled and undated per facility's policy and procedure (P&P). 2. One laptop mounted to an Intravenous (IV) cart (a mobile cart used by licensed nurses to store and transport medication and supplies) was found visibly soiled, with dried white substance on it, on unit one outside nursing station.3.Resident 11's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control guideline that requires staff to wear a gown and gloves while performing high-contact care activities with all residents who are at higher risk of acquiring or spreading infectious diseases) protocol were not followed in accordance with facility's P&P.4. On January 28, 2026, Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN3) was observed entering the room of Resident 32, who was on EBP precautions, without wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's right were followed for one of three sample residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7 was administered lorazepam ( medication used to treat short-term anxiety, panic attacks, and sleep problems) without being informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the medication, the treatment alternatives or other options. This failure resulted in Resident 7 not being fully informed about the care and treatment provided.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included Anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness, ), heart failure (the heart doesn't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), shortness of breath (sensation of being unable to breathe normally), and diabetes (difficulty in blood sugar control).During a review of Resident 7's Physician Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to one of one resident (Resident 56) when on January 25, 2026, Resident 56 left the facility without staff being aware. Resident 56 was found down the street from the facility in a parking lot near a gas station. This failure had the potential to result in harm to Resident 56 who was at risk for injuries.Findings: During a review of Resident 56's Face Sheet (contains medical and demographic information), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included aphasia (a language disorder that affects the ability to speak, understand, read and/or write), epilepsy (seizure disorder), anxiety disorder (a condition characterized by excessive fear of or apprehension about real or perceived threats), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition characterized by the combination of schizophrenia symptoms [e.g., hallucinations, delusions, disorganized speech]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assessment and monitoring for one of one resident (Resident 88) investigated for dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys no longer function) when:a. There was no documented evidence staff performed assessment of Resident 88's dialysis access site every nursing shift (day, evening, and night shift) as ordered by the physician.b. There was no documented evidence to indicate staff performed a pre (before) and post (after) assessment of Resident 88's dialysis access site (the location where a dialysis machine is connected to a patient) for bruit (a low-pitched, rushing, or whooshing sound heard with a stethoscope over the site of a fistula) and thrill (a distinct, rhythmic buzzing or humming vibration felt upon palpation [touching] of a patient's vascular access) and bleeding. These failures had the potential for a delay in the staff identification and subsequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to exercise the right to access personal and medical records for one of two residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 requested her medical records but were not provided within 48 hours of the request as per the facility's policy. This failure resulted in a violation of Resident 1's right to have access to medical records as requested by Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 Face Sheet (contain resident demographic), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included polyneuropathy (a condition where multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body are damaged). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (facility assessment tool), dated April 5, 2025, under Section C, it indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14. (A BIMS score of 13 to 15 suggests the patient is cognitively intact.) During an interview on June 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that appropriate procedures were followed after an unwitnessed fall of one of four sampled resident (Resident 1). There was no documentation of the fall, physician notification, and no indication that Resident 1 was monitored following the incident. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's overall medical condition to decline and go undetected by the facility. Findings: During a review of Residents 1's (R1) admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included orthopedic after care, (period following surgery or treatment where patient receives ongoing care to receive to support recovery and healing), fracture tibia and fibula ( lower leg fracture), abnormality of gait and mobility (deviation from a normal walking pattern), type 2 diabetes mellitus (body has trouble controlling blood sugar), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood ), kidney disease (…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for Administering Medications for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) when licensed staff did not monitor Resident 4's blood pressure and heart rate every six hours as ordered by resident 4's physician and give Hydralazine (medication to treat high blood pressure) as needed. This failure resulted in Resident 4 a clinically compromised resident being sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 4 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, hypertension (a condition when the blood pressure is high), hemiplegia (weakness that affect one side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high), end stage renal disease (a disease when the kidneys are no longer working). During a review of Care Plan Report,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from financial exploitation (taking advantage of a resident for personal gain, through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion) by a staff member. This failure had the potential to cause significant emotional and financial harm to Resident 1 and had the potential to place other residents at risk of abuse, neglect and exploitation. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet (a document containing clinical and demographic information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included depression (feeling sad and low motivation), anxiety (feeling restless), and colonostomy status (an opening in the abdominal wall to allow waste to exit the body through the colon). During a review of the State of California Form 341 REPORT OF SUSPECTED DEPENDENT ADULT/ELDER ABUSE, dated December 5, 2024, it indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to follow their policy in providing Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) when personal hygiene was not provide as needed and failing to notify responsible party (RP) of Resident 1 ' s shower refusals. This failure has potential in putting Resident 1 ' s health and safety at risk when hygiene needs were not met. Findings: During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: cerebral infarction (blood blocked to brain, causing tissue death), Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) Neurogenic Bladder (bladder retention), Urinary tract infection, schizoaffective disorder (hallucination s, delusions), hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1 ' s Medical Record with the Director of Nursing (DON), reviewed are as follows: 1. Task…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when: 1. On October 1, 2024, two unopened one-pound bags of mini marshmallows, with an expiration date of August 8, 2024, were found stored on top of a shelf in the dry storage room and was available for use. 2. On October 1, 2024, one 4 oz (ounce- a unit for measuring liquid) cup of apple juice and one 4 oz cup of cranberry juice, with the date September 29, 2024, were found on Resident 51's bedside table and were available for consumption. These failures have the potential to compromise food safety and increase the risk of foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) for 84 vulnerable residents receiving food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on October 1, 2024, at 8:19 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DSS), in the kitchen, the dry storage room was inspected. Two unopened one-pound bags of mini marshmallows, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Significant Change of Status Assessments (SCSA- required when a resident's condition has significantly changed, either improving or declining, and the change is expected to last longer than two weeks) of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool) were completed within 14 days for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device)(Resident 39) when Resident 39 had a significant decline in her condition due to severe weight loss and changes in the stage (a system used to classify severity) of her pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in Resident 39's care plan not being updated and revised to reflect her current status, which had the potential to delay the implementation of her care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (a document that contains…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight residents reviewed for Range of Motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint) (Resident 39) receives appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM and/or to prevent further decrease in ROM when Resident 39's Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA- help residents improve and maintain their physical abilities and ADLs, and prevent further decline) orders were not carried out in a timely manner. This failure could have potentially caused a delay of preventing severe contractures (a medical condition characterized by the shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or connective tissues, which can lead to stiffness and restricted movement in joints) of all extremities. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), it indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition (nutritional status in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with prescriber's orders and facility policy for one resident reviewed for use of antibiotic (medication used to treat bacterial infections) (Resident 39). This failure had the potential to make the antibiotic less effective and prolong the course of treatment, placing Resident 39's health at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), the admission Record indicated, Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition, (nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), dystonia (movement disorder), and epilepsy (brain disorder that causes recurring, unprovoked seizures). During a review of Resident 39's physician order, dated August 21, 2024, it indicated, Ertapenem Sodium (Ertapenem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 39) received a diet prescribed by their physician in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to place Resident 39 at risk for further nutrition and medical decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (contains demographic and clinical data), it indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition (nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), dystonia (movement disorder), and epilepsy (brain disorder that causes recurring, unprovoked seizures). During a review of Resident 39's Outpatient Clinic Prescription from her Primary Care Physician, dated August 8, 2024, it indicated Please d/c [discontinue] current diet and follow recommendations per Barium test result. Small quarter size chopped soft diet w/ [with] thin liquids by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention were implemented among a highly vulnerable population of 86 residents, when an oxygen tubing (thin plastic tube that connects a machine, which makes extra oxygen to a person's nose) and related oxygen supplies were not replaced in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one of five residents reviewed for oxygen (Resident 34). This failure has the potential to cause and increased risk of infection to Resident 34 due to prolonged use of respiratory equipment without proper replacement. Findings: During a record review of Resident 34's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease (like a stroke, where the blood flow to part of the brain is block), dementia (general term to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a certified nursing assistant was able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) did not report Resident 1's redness on the nose to a licensed nurse. This failure had the potential to result in delayed treatment and care for Resident 1, placing Resident 1 ' s health at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the stomach (stomach tumor), malignant neoplasm of unspecified kidney (kidney tumor) and repeated falls. During a concurrent observation and interview on September 5, 2024, at 9:58 AM, with Resident 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was lying in bed. Resident 1 ' s bed was in the lowest position. Resident 1 had redness on her nose,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with resident needs and safely for one of 3 Residents (Resident 1) when: 1.Resident 1 acquired an open wound to right hand pinkie finger. 2.No wound dressing as ordered noted on pinkie finger open wound. 3.No wound care treatment as per Treatment Record for September 23, 2024. This failure resulted in a clinically compromised resident, (Resident 1) health and safety at risk, when the developed in facility and wound was exposed with possibility for infection. Findings: During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (disruption of normal bacteria in colon from antibiotics causing diarrhea), mononeuropathy (compression of nerve, cause loss of movement/sensation), muscle weakness, abnormal posture, dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision, monitoring, and implementation of interventions were enforced for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's whereabouts were not monitored and documented in accordance with the physician's orders and care plan after Resident 1 had an altercation with another resident on June 11, 2024. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have an increased risk of further altercation which could place him at risk of injuries and bodily harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest task), and anxiety disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy and procedure to ensure call lights were answered in timely manner to provide care and services for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2). This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1 and 2) safety at risk. When residents were left soiled, and their activities of daily living were not met in timely manner. Findings: During interview and Records Reviewed with (Resident 1 and 2) indicates as followed: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include osteoarthritis of left knee ( degeneration of joint cartilage, and it causes pain and stiffness), spinal stenosis (space inside the bones of the spine gets too small), Polyneuropathy ( multiple nerves outside of the brain and spinal cord becomes damage), Hemiplegia ( paralysis of one side of the body),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy and procedure to ensure call lights were answered in timely manner to provide care and services for six of seven sampled residents (Resident 1,2, 3,4,5, and 6). This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1,2, 3,4,5, and 6) health and safety at risk. When residents were left soiled, and their activities of daily living were not met in timely manner. Findings: During interview and Records Reviewed with (Resident 1,2, 3,4,5, and 6) indicates as followed: 1. During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes (condition affecting how body processes sugar), intestinal obstruction (digested material prevented from passing normally), major depressive disorder (depressed mood, loss of interest). During an interview with Resident 1, Resident 1 states, Call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure the care plan (a summary of a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3's care plan intervention for psychology consult was not implemented after an alleged abuse was reported by Resident 3 on January 30, 2024. This failure had the potential to cause a delay in identifying Resident 3's psychological need, immediate care and support needs which could place her mental and psychosocial well-being at the higher risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety disorder (a mental disorder often worried or anxious about many…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) had a verbal altercation with Resident 1, pushed his wheelchair outside the facility and closed the door, leaving Resident 1 outside the facility on July 2, 2023. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), end stage renal disease (medical condition in which kidneys cease functioning), and hyperlipidemia (elevated fat in the blood). During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The top of the mixer and the coffee maker were dusty, which had the potential to contaminate the food and coffee with dust. 2. The floors under the center island and behind the ice machine had food crumbs and trash, which had the potential to attract microorganism carrying pests. 3. Two plastic four-quart containers were stacked and stored wet, which had the potential for bacteria (can cause disease) growth. 4. Two metal pans, which stored clean utensils, had liners with food crumbs under the liners, which had the potential to attract microorganism carrying pests and contaminate the clean utensils 5. The ice machine had black build up in the ice chute (where ice exits the area where its formed and drops into the ice bin), which put residents who used or ingested ice from this machine, at risk for food-borne illness (illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food). 6. The dishwashing machine was not sanitizing, which led to dishes not being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not properly dispose (get rid of by throwing away) of trash when the outside dumpster area had gloves, trash, and rotten (decomposing or break down) food on the ground. This failure had the potential to attract vermin (pest or animals that spread diseases) in the facility that cares for 81 medically compromised residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on April 4, 2022, at 9:29 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the outdoor garbage storage area had gloves, trash, and rotten food on the ground. The DS stated that the outdoor garbage storage area should be clean and free of food or trash. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Waste Control and Disposal, dated 2019, indicated, Outside garbage bin should be kept closed at all times and surrounding area must be kept clean. During a review of the FDA Federal Food Code, 2017, it indicates in 5-501.11 Proper storage and disposal of garbage and refuse are necessary to minimize the development of odors, prevent such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of a Coronavirus, COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory infection) when: 1. Resident 389 was observed not following proper personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines when Resident was in yellow zone (Residents under isolation observation for suspected COVID-19). 2. The COVID-19 screening forms (forms that are used to screen individuals for COVID-19 symptoms prior to entry into the facility) were not completed on the visitor's COVID-19 screening forms before entering the facility. 3. One Registered Nurse (RN 1) did not perform hand hygiene or hand washing before prepping and administration of medications between three out of eight residents. (Residents 27, 56 and 11) 4. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) failed to wear PPE (personal protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Advance Directives (A legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions), were completed for nine sampled residents (Residents 25, 432, 389, 77, 55, 58, 81, 61 and 75). This failure had the potential to result in a delay of treatment for the residents as related to advance directives, or for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the resident wanted. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 25 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which includes end stage renal disease (a condition in which kidneys cease functioning), heart failure ( a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), cirrhosis of liver (condition where liver is permanently damaged), dependence on renal dialysis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for five of 21 sampled residents (Resident 4, 9, 14, 24, 73), when range of motion exercises, splints and hand rolls were not provided as per physician orders. This failure had the potential to decrease in the range of motion and could have resulted in worsening of contractures (joint stiffness) and mobility. Findings: 1. A review of the facility document titled admission Record, (a document contains clinical and demographic data). Resident 4, admission dated January 4, 2022 (current), with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), abnormal posture, and multiple sites contractures of muscles (joint stiffness, tightening of muscles or tendons). A review of the facility document titled, Order summary report, the active physician orders dated, January 5, 2022, indicated, Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) orders for range of motion exercises to bilateral lower and upper extremities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of 81 residents (Resident 75 and Resident 58) when: 1. Resident 75 lost 16% of her body weight from January 14th, 2022, to April 2, 2022. Her gastrostomy tube (GT- a tube placed through abdominal wall through which liquid nourishment and medications are administered) feeding rate was calculated on her adjusted body weight (adj bw) (calculation used to calculate energy needs for overweight or obese people who want to lose weight) of 56.6 kilograms (equals 124.5 pounds) which was 40 pounds less than her actual body weight. 2 Resident 58 lost 13% of his body weight in 3 months from January 2022 to April 2022. Resident 58 was improperly assessed by the Registered Dietitian (RD 1) when she did not do an in-person assessment and staff did not inform her that resident was eating with his hands. Resident 58 was observed eating with his hands on a mechanical soft diet (texture-modified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their daily menu for lunch when, on April 5, 2022, at 12:45 PM, the [NAME] 1 did not prepare the puree (food that is blended until it is a thick, smooth, lump-free consistency) diet lunch correctly. The [NAME] 1 pureed regular bread for the puree diets but should have pureed garlic bread. 17 Residents received the puree diet. This failure had the potential for residents to lose their appetite and compromise the nutritional status of 17 out of 78 Residents, Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on, April 5, 2022, at 12:45 PM, a regular diet test tray and a pureed diet test tray was sampled. The cook served the regular diet and puree diet test tray from the food on the tray-line that was prepared for the residents. The puree bread did not taste similar to the regular diet bread. The Dietary Supervisory (DS) tasted the puree bread and the regular garlic bread and stated that the pureed bread did not taste the same as the garlic bread. He stated he needed to check the spreadsheet and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for two residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 2, and 305 bed 2), when several small flies were observed flying in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed-2's ceiling and by bedside table, and flies observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 2 on the walls and ceiling. These failures had the potential to cause irritation to residents' skin and could spread infectious bacteria to the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation and an interview on April 4, 2022, at 11:41 AM, in Resident 39's room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 2, there were several small flies (gnats) on the right side of the room next to Resident 39's bed on the bedside table, on the wall of right side of the room. When asked about the flies, the Resident 39 stated, the flies had been there for a while. During an interview on April 4, 2022, at 12:53 PM, with the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 2), when asked about the flies in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 2, CNA 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of one sampled resident (Resident 11) when Resident 11's urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag, was not covered by a dignity bag. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 11's dignity and violate his right to privacy, which could cause psychosocial harm and lead to low self-esteem, feeling irritated, sad, and anxious. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breath), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where body does not produce enough insulin), left hand contractures, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (condition in which stomach acid flows back into the esophagus), schizoaffective disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and closed record review, the facility did not ensure that one of three closed record sampled residents (Resident A) had orthostatic blood pressures (Blood pressure is taken, lying, sitting, and standing to determine if there is a drop with position change) or do vital signs (temperature, pulse, respiration and blood pressure) every four hours as well as, the oxygen saturation level as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in resident being transferred to a hospital (a higher level of care). Findings: During a closed record review for Resident A on [DATE], at 12:00 PM, the face sheet indicated Resident A as admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included : hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body), history of cerebrovascular accident (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), Lewy Body dementia (a disease associated with abnormal deposits of a protein in the brain, which can lead to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for one Resident (Resident 56), when the facility did not implement intervention (floor mat) to prevent future falls as indicated in the care plan and the physician orders. This failure had the potential to result in future falls and increase the risk of injury related to falls. Findings: A review of the facility document titled admission Record, (a document contains clinical and demographic data). Resident 56 was a [AGE] year-old female, admission dated November 5, 2021, with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (increase sugar level in the blood), hypertension (increase blood pressure), generalized muscle weakness, syncope (sudden loss of consciousness). During an observation on April 4, 2022, at 11:26 AM, Resident 56 was observed to be in bed, the bed was against the left wall and there was no floor mat on the right side of the bed. During an observation on April 7, 2022, at 3:21 PM, Resident 56 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure glucometer (device used to measure sugar levels in blood) calibration monitoring were complete for three of three nursing units (Unit 1, 2 and 3). These failures had the potential to get inaccurate blood glucose results for 20 residents receiving insulin. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on April 6, 2022, at 5:49 AM, with the License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), medication cart for Unit 1's Quality Control Record [name of the glucometer] (QCR), dated April 2022, was reviewed. The QCR includes Operators Initials, Meter Cleaned and Disinfected, Meter Strip Lot #, Test Exp. Date, Test Strip Normal Lot #, Expiration Date, Normal Control Range, Normal Control Result, Normal High Lot #, Exp. Date, High control Range, High control Result, High Corrective Action. The QCR indicated the following: a. On April 2, 2022, all columns were left blank. b. On April 3, 2022, all columns were left blank. c. On April 4, 2022, all columns were left blank. The LVN 1 stated that the QCR had some missing documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure to maintain accurate records of controlled medications (medications that are controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) for three of three medication carts (Carts 1, 2 and 3). These failures placed the facility at potential for diversion (illegal distribution of controlled drugs for any illicit use) of controlled medications by staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on April 6, 2022, at 5:47 AM, with the License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), medication cart 1's Floor Narcotic Release (FNR - a form used by facility to verify counting of controlled drugs at the change of shift by oncoming and off going licensed nurses), dated April 2022, was reviewed. The FNR indicated the following: a. On April 1, 2022, missing signatures from incoming nurses (IN) and outgoing nurses (OUT) at 7:00 A (7-3 IN), 3:00 P (7-3 OUT), 11:00 P (11-7 IN). b. On April 2, 2022, missing signatures from incoming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not accommodate one of 78 residents (Resident 387) preferences on a vegetarian diet (a diet that does not include any meat, poultry, or seafood) by not having a vegetarian menu available. This failure had the potential for Resident 387 to have a compromised nutritional status due to not eating a varied (a number of different types) and nutritionally balanced (the correct number of calories and nutrients) vegetarian diet due to the facility not having a vegetarian menu planned a week in advance. Findings: During an observation on April 4th, 2022, at 12:10 PM, the cook served Resident 387, scalloped potatoes, garlic spinach, and a roll. The Diet Aide grabbed the plate and put a cover on it and put it on the cart for delivery. The registered dietitian stopped the staff and said that this resident needed a protein. She told them to add a serving of cottage cheese. During a concurrent interview and record review on April 5, 2022, at 10:55 AM, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,032 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,032 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.1 | +1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| LEHMANN, LIBBY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| ABRAHAM, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/14/2025 |
| ADLAWAN, MARIA VICTORIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/21/2024 |
| GOLBOO, SEPEHR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/10/2019 |
| KLAVAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/1986 |
| NEIGHBORS, RICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/14/2025 |
| FRIEDMAN, AARON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| KLAVAN, RACHEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| NOTIS, SHMUEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| HANSEN HUNTER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| MEADOWS RIDGE INVESTMENTS LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| PERVAIZ, ZAID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555089. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.