No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highland Springs Care Center

1441 Michigan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 87 certified beds · (951) 769-2500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$77,191 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $77,191 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-29)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
851 E 6th St · (909) 887-2991 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1430 Beaumont Ave · (951) 769-4095 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1430 Beaumont Ave · (951) 845-8770 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(951) 769-8524 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
960 Oak Valley Pkwy, Beaumont, CA 92223 · (951) 845-1404

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.3%93.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.032.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.581.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.7%CMS range 27.8–51.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 5.9–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 2.9–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
48.9%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 81.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a respiratory protection program (a program intended to establish practices for the selection, use, and care of respiratory protective equipment in the workplace) was implemented, when 47 out of 106 direct care staff (Certified Nursing Assistants [CNA] 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and Registered Nurses (RN) 1, 2, and 3) were fit tested with the use of N-95 filtering facepiece respirator, (FFR - filtering facepiece respirator - a disposable half-mask that covers the user's airway (nose and mouth) and offers protection from particulate materials), in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and CDC guidelines. This failure had the potential to affect the 43 of 75 remaining vulnerable residents not affected with COVID-19 residing in the facility. As of November 14, 2024, the facility has 32 residents and 12 staff tested positive for COVID-19. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for four of six residents reviewed for weight loss (Residents 12, 11, 33, and 32) the following:1. For Resident 12, who was not on a planned weight loss program (an approach to losing and maintaining weight characterized by a reduced-calorie, nutritionally balanced eating plan, regular physical activity, and a behavior change component to promote sustained lifestyle habits), the facility failed to assess the continued weight loss from 153 pounds (lbs.-unit of measurement) to 131 lbs. since January 2025, and initiate interventions to prevent further loss.This failure resulted in Resident 12 losing weight since admission to the facility. Resident 12 lost 24 lbs. since admission. (admission weight 153, in January 2025, and was 129 lbs. in August 2025). 2. For Resident 11, who was not on a planned weight loss program, the facility failed to assess the continued weight loss from 247 lbs. to 217 lbs. since February 3, 2025, and initiate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents involved in multiple altercations (physical fight) (Residents 1 and 2) were separated and distanced away from each other as indicated in the care plan. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being grabbed and pulled out from a chair which led to a closed clavicle fracture (broken collarbone). Findings: On October 2, 2024 at 8:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of physical abuse (the intentional use of physical force to cause injury or harm to another person). On October 2, 2024, Resident 2's admission record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to facility on February 9, 2024, with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder affecting a person's emotions and perception of reality). A review of Resident 2's History and Physical, dated September 20, 2024, indicated Resident 2 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for one of four residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 41), when the resident tripped on an in-ground planter (a garden bed or a space dug into the ground where plants are grown) that was approximately 3.25 to 3.5 inch deep above the ground level. This failure resulted for Resident 41 falling and hitting her head on the picnic table, resulting in a periorbital hematoma (black eye- swelling and discoloration around the eye area) and a fracture of the nasal septum (broken or cracked part inside the nose that separated the two sides). Findings: On July 24, 2024, at 9 a.m., Resident 41 was observed walking independently by the nursing station and had dark purplish discoloration on both eyes. A review of the Resident 41's admission RECORD, dated July 23, 2024, indicated, Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), was free from injury from an unwitnessed fall, when Resident 1's bed alarm was not responded to timely.This failure has the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further falls.Findings:On April 20, 2026, at 11:03 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate quality of care issue.On April 20, 2026, during a review of Resident 1's medical records indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on April 5, 2026, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, (broken hip bone), type 2 diabetes, (abnormal blood sugar), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), dementia, (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and benign prostatic hyperplasia, (BPH -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and document non-pharmacological interventions (NPI), for four of four sampled residents (Resident 3, 9, 12, and 61) receiving psychotropic medications. In addition, for Resident 61, the facility failed to document the NPI were attempted prior to initiating psychotropic medications.These failures had the potential to place residents at risk of unnecessary psychotropic medication use and adverse side effects, such as sedation and falls.Findings:1. On August 27, 2025, a review of Resident 3's admission Record, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness characterized by significant disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotions, and social behaviors), anxiety, and mild cognitive impairment (trouble with thinking skills, like memory, concentration, problem-solving). A review of Resident 3's Order Summary Report, indicated the following physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications were not stored in the medication cart readily available for use. This failure has the potential for the residents to receive discontinued medications. Findings:On August 27, 2025, at 10:06 a.m., an observation, with a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3. LVN 3 stated medications stored in Medication Cart 1 were readily available for use.The following medications were found stored at the bottom drawer of the medication cart:- For Resident 38, 30 tablets of hydroxyzine HCl (medication used to treat anxiety and allergic skin reaction) 25 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) give one tablet orally every six hours as needed for anxiety manifested by crying and wringing of hands for 10 days (date ordered July 24, 2025). In a concurrent interview, LVN 3 stated this medication was discontinued on July 30, 2025;- For Resident 50, 14 patches of Lidoderm Patch (topical pain medication) 5% to apply to painful area in the morning for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure in preparation of pureed food by methods to conserve nutritive value, for 16 out of 16 residents who received pureed foods.This failure had the potential for the residents to receive food with inadequate nutritive value and could potentially place the residents at risk for compromised nutritional status.Findings:On August 25, 2025, at 9:28 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in front of oven inside the kitchen. Several serving pans of foods were observed holding inside the oven. The CDM took out some of the serving pans and stated they had finished preparing pureed food items (meat ball, zucchini, and pasta) for the lunch meal.On August 25, 2025, at 10:03 a.m., an interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 stated he needed to cook all regular food items on the menu first and store them inside the oven and then scooped out those regular food items to prepare the pureed foods. [NAME] 1 stated he started preparing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. The reach-in refrigerator ventilator had dust;2. The reach-in refrigerator storage shelves had chipping paint;3. Two opened food items were found unsealed in the freezer; and4. Hamburger buns were not stored according to manufacturer's guidelines.These failures had the potential to result in the spread of food borne illness within the facility due to the contamination and improper storage of food. Findings:1. On August 25, 2025, at 9:28 a.m., an inspection was conducted in the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). Upon inspection of the reach in refrigerator, dust was observed in the refrigerator ventilator. The CDM stated that the reach in refrigerator was cleaned last month and that staff are .supposed to clean it. The CDM stated that they need to clean it more frequently.On August 26, 2025, at 3:20 p.m., the CDM stated that it was not acceptable to have dust in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper maintenance of essential equipment, when the walk-in freezer had icicles built up. This failure had a potential risk to affect the quality of food stored in the walk-in freezer. Findings:On August 25, 2025, at 10:45 a.m., a concurrent observation of the walk-in freezer inside the kitchen and interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was conducted. Icicles built up were observed around the connection of black pipe inside the walk in freezer. Foods were observed stored under the black pipe. The CDM stated she just noticed the icicles built up and it was not usual to have icicles built up inside the walk-in freezer. On August 25, 2025, at 3:32 p.m., an observation was conducted at the walk-in freezer in the kitchen. Some new icicles were built up were observed around the connection of the black pipe and there was ice built up on the wall under the black pipe too. On August 26, 2025, at 9:20 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Registered Dietitian (RD) 2 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place, when house flies were observed flying and landing on a resident's meal during lunch in the dining room on August 25, 2025.This failure had the potential to spread food borne illness within the facility due to the contamination and inadequate pest control.Findings:On August 25, 2025, at 12:28 p.m., three flies were observed flying around table two in the dining room. One fly landed on the rim of Resident 45's drinking glass.On August 25, 2025, at 12:32 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed assisting Resident 46 with her meal. The flies were still observed flying around table two. LVN 1 stated that flies should not be in the dining room and that it was unsanitary.On August 25, 2025, at 12:42 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 was observed swatting the flies away. CNA 4 stated flies are unsanitary and considered an infection control issue.On August 26, 2025, at 10:52 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) was interviewed. The IP stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the resident's individualized needs, for two of 19 residents reviewed when:1. For Resident 31, the facility did not provide a wheelchair that was properly cleaned, comfortable, and safe to accommodate his needs. This failure resulted in Resident 31, not to have a full support of his buttocks during transfer from bed to wheelchair or from wheelchair to bed when the wheelchair seat was worn out and sagging (losing firmness and drooping) in the middle. In addition, the wheelchair had a built-in whitish stain embedded at the cloth material; and2. For Resident 86, the facility did not replace his rollaway walker when the seat cover had multiple tears and the middle vinyl seat cover had a large tear exposing the foam material from inside. This failure resulted in Resident 31 not to have a comfortable walker for daily use when the seat cover had exposed foam materials to seat on and multiple tears of vinyl material were touching his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse followed the manufacturer's instructions for priming an insulin pen, for one of six residents observed during medication administration (Resident 30).This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate insulin dosing and adverse effects, such as poor glycemic control. Findings:On August 25, 2025, at 11:39 a.m., during a medication administration observation with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 was observed pricking Resident 30's right middle finger to obtain a blood sample.On August 25, 2025, at 11:55 a.m., LVN 1 was observed removing an insulin pen Insulin Lispro KwikPen (a prefilled pen containing insulin lispro, a rapid-acting insulin used to lower blood glucose) from the medication cart. LVN 1 removed the pen cap, attached a new needle to the pen hub without wiping the rubber seal with an alcohol swab, then turned the dose knob to select two (2) units to prime (a process of removing air from the insulin pen and needle before each injection) the pen. LVN 1 then quickly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 40 and 14) when:1. For Resident 40, the fingernails on both hands were long and had blackish materials embedded underneath the resident's nailbeds; and2. For Resident 14, had dried food debris on the mouth, beard, and chin.These failures had the potential to negatively impact the physiological and psychological well-being of Residents 40 and 14. Findings: 1. On August 25, 2025, at 11:44 a.m., Resident 40 was observed lying in bed, awake, and able to answer simple questions. Resident 40 was observed with long fingernails on both hands with blackish materials underneath the nailbeds. In a concurrent interview with Resident 40, he stated he wanted his nails trimmed. On August 26, 2025, at 10:45 a.m., Resident 40 was observed sitting in his wheelchair at the lobby. Resident 40 was observed to still have long fingernails. On August 27. 2025, at 12:15 p.m., a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician order for oxygen administration, for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 13). This failure had the potential for Resident 13 to receive ineffective oxygen therapy, and had increased risk of hospitalization and adverse outcomes including death for Resident 13. Findings:On August 25, 2025, at 10:05 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 13. Resident 13 was observed wearing an oxygen mask over his nose and mouth, with the oxygen concentrator (a device that concentrates oxygen from the air into a highly purified, breathable form to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to individuals with low blood oxygen levels) at the right side of his bed. Resident 13 observed receiving 3.5 L/min of oxygen (LPM - liters per minute; unit of measurement). Resident 13 stated he used oxygen all the time, including when he sleeps. A review of Resident 13's admission Record, indicated Resident 13 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental care services and follow up treatment was provided, for one of 19 residents reviewed (ResidentThis failure had the potential for pain, infection, poor nutrition, and further decline in oral health for Resident 18. Findings:On August 26, 2025, at 9:42 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 18. Resident 18 was observed with a left lower side tooth missing and a partial, blackened tooth remaining in the gums. Resident 18 stated he felt discomfort chewing his food. Resident 18 stated he wanted to know the status of his dental appointment. Resident 18 stated he could not recall the last time he saw the dentist.On August 27, 2025, at 12:50 p.m., an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 was conducted. CNA 3 stated the CNAs provide oral hygiene care for residents. CNA 3 stated if he found a resident with a broken tooth or denture, he would report it to the charge nurse.On August 27,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food texture was provided, for one out of one resident reviewed (Resident 25), when Resident 25's meal was not fully pureed and had chunks in his meal during lunch on August 25, 2025.This failure had the potential for Resident 25 to aspirate and cause harm to Resident 25.Findings:On August 25, 2025, at 12 p.m., a dining observation was conducted in the designated RNA (Restorative Nurse Assistant) Feeding Program Room. Resident 25 was observed to have puree food and was spitting out a few chunks of his food onto his napkin. In a concurrent interview with Resident 25, he stated that he did not know what the chunks were. Resident 25's meal ticket was reviewed and indicated that Resident 25 was on a puree diet.On August 25, 2025, at 12:21 p.m., an interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 who sat next to Resident 25 during his meal. LVN 4 stated the puree food should be smooth and with no solids or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention and control practices were implemented in accordance with its policy and manufacturer's instructions, when: 1. For Resident 67, a licensed nurse did not properly clean and disinfect the shared stethoscope before and after use, as required by the facility's policy; and 2. For Resident 30, a licensed nurse did not disinfect the rubber seal of an insulin pen prior to attaching a needle, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infection, placing residents at risk, and compromise their health and well-being. Findings:1. On August 25, 2025, at 9:17 a.m., during a medication administration observation with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6, LVN 6 was observed using a shared blood pressure cuff and stethoscope to measure Resident 67's blood pressure (BP). LVN 6 disinfected the shared blood pressure cuff before and after use with a Micro-Kill One Germicidal Wipes (Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-22 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents (Resident 1):1.The depakote (medication to treat mood disorder) dosage recommended by the general acute hospital (GACH) was carried out when Resident 1 was re-admitted back to the facility; and2.The facility psychiatry nurse practitioner (PNP- an advanced practice registered nurse specializing in mental health care) review the acute hospital assessment and medication adjustment recommendations.These failures had the potential to contribute to unmanaged behavior of Resident 1 and affect overall behavioral condition of the resident. Findings:On July 14, 2025, at 8:38 a.m., Resident 1 was observed awake and lying on bed, with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) sitting outside Resident 1's room.On July 14, 2025, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) with behavior disturbance.A review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of one residents (Resident 1) was appropriately monitored by their sitter in two instances when:Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was not fully implementing a 1:1 (one sitter/staff member assigned to closely watch one resident) monitoring on Resident 1; andCNA 2 left Resident 1 unattended during 1:1 monitoring.These failures had the potential to cause harm to Resident 1 and to fellow residents.Findings: On July 14, 2025, at 8:22 a.m., an unannounced visit was made at the facility in order to investigate a complaint stating Resident 1's Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was reported asleep while on a 1:1 monitoring duty during the morning of July 4, 2025.1. On July 14, 2025, at 8:35 a.m., Resident 1 was observed asleep in her bed without a staff member nearby. On July 14, 2025, at 12:10 p.m., Resident 1's medical records were reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of eleven sampled residents' (Resident 4 and Resident 5) call lights were within reach. This failure has the potential for Resident 4 and Resident 5 to have unmet needs due to inability to be able to call for assistance. Findings: On August 22, 2024, at 11:20 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted for the investigation of two Facility Reported Incidents and one complaint. On August 22, 2024, at 12:48 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 4. Resident 4 was sitting on the right side of her bed in her wheelchair. Resident 4 ' s call light was hanging above the right side of the head of the bed. Resident 4 stated she needed help to be changed and was not able to call for help. Resident 4 stated she was unable to reach her call light. On August 22, 2024, at 12:59 p.m., observed Resident 5 sitting in her wheelchair on the right side of the foot of Resident 4 ' s bed. Resident 5 ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessments for six of 22 sampled residents (Residents 14, 34, 49, 51, 53, and 82) were completed within 14 calendar days after admission. This failure had the potential for residents to not receive resident centered care (care focusing on the needs of individuals) for Residents 14, 34, 49, 51, 53, and 82. Findings: On July 25, 2024, at 11:20 a.m. a concurrent interview and review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) comprehensive assessments were conducted with the MDS Nurse. The MDS nurse stated comprehensive assessment should be completed within 14 days after admission. The MDS nurse stated, it is important to complete the resident's MDS on time and submit to Center for Medicare Services (CMS - an agency that manages various aspects of healthcare delivery and funding) within 14 days to assess the residents' health status and provide a resident-centered care plan. The MDS nurse stated the comprehensive assessments for Residents 14, 34, 49, 51, 53, and 82 were not completed within 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed, for four of seven residents (Residents 46, 10, 40, and 76) to ensure: 1a. Resident 46 was provided privacy by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, when she assessed the resident for back pain; and 1b. Resident 10 was provided privacy by LVN 2, when he applied the Voltaren Cream (pain medication cream applied topically). These failured had the potential toi violate residents rights to privacy during medication administration. and 2a. Resident 40's narcotic medication Norco (brand name or narcotic pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement) was documented as administered by the Licensed Nurse (LN) on June 18 and 27, 2024; and 2b. For Resident 76, the medication Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) was documented as administered by the LN on July 16 and 24, 2024. These failures resulted to the delay in the identification of drug discrepancies and possible medication diversion of controlled medications. Findings: 1a. On July 24, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff could carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when [NAME] (CK) 1, Dietary Aide (DA) 3 and DA 4 were unable to accurately describe the cooldown process for hot food and ambient food temperatures. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On July 23, 2024, at 11 a.m., during an interview with DA 3 of the cooldown process for hot food and ambient food temperatures inside the kitchen, she stated the hot food cooldown temperature starts at 186 degrees. DA 3 stated the temperature should be checked after two hours, with a goal temperature of 140 degrees. DA 3 further stated she would check the food temperature after another 2 hours with a goal temperature of 34 degrees. DA 3 stated the cooldown process for ambient food temperature, like tuna salad is after the food was made, it should be placed in the refrigerator and checked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment, to prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The toaster dial control had a build up of brown-yellowish grime. 2. Multiple cutting boards had yellowish discoloration, deep cuts, indentations, and damaged. 3. The left and right sides of the oven, the front inside surfaces of the left and right oven doors showed brown discoloration. (cross reference F908) 4. The front metal areas of two meal tray carts were stained with brown discoloration. (cross reference F908) These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On July 22, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., during a concurrent walk-through observation and interview inside the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), the following were observed: 1. One toaster had brown-yellowish grime buildup in the front dial control. The DM stated the the toaster is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, one toaster, two oven doors, the left and right sides of the oven and four meal tray carts were maintained in a safe operating condition. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On July 22, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview inside the kitchen of the toaster with the Dietary Manager (DM), the toaster dial had chipped and peeled plastic film. The DM stated the toaster was old and needs to be replaced. The DM further stated bacteria can grow into the chipped and peeled areas, can cross contaminate the food and cause food-borne illness. On July 22, 2024, at 8:40 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview inside the kitchen with the DM, the left and right sides of the oven were observed with chipped and peeled paint, and had brown discoloration. During further observation, the front inside surfaces of the left and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable homelike environment for one of eight residents (Resident 87) when multiple damaged window blinds were observed. This failure had the potential to disrupt the residents' daily living needs and environment. Findings: On July 22, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 87's room. Multiple damaged blinds were observed. Resident 87 stated it is too bright and she used curtains to block the light coming through the damaged blinds. On July 24, 2024, at 8:19 a.m., during an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), He stated he was aware about the damaged window blinds in Resident 87's room. He stated, the blinds need to be replaced. On July 24, 2024, at 8:35 a.m., during an interview with the Facility Administrator (FA), the FA stated she was aware that the damaged window blinds needed to be repaired. The FA further stated the blinds should have been replaced or repaired to provide home like environment for the residents. A review of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education and resources regarding Advance Directive (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) were provided to one of the three residents reviewed for AD (Residents 44), and or the Resident Representative (RP). This failure had the potential for Resident 44 and the RP to remain uneducated and uninformed about AD and could result in the facility being unable to know and honor the resident's wishes regarding medical treatment. Findings: On July 23, 2024, Resident 44's record was reviewed. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 44's History and Physical, dated June 9, 2024, indicated Resident 44 cannot make decisions. A review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated June 12, 2024, indicated, Resident 44 had severely impaired cognitive skills. A review of Resident 44's Advance Directive Acknowledgement Form, dated June 10, 2024, indicated Resident 44 had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of seven residents reviewed for environment (Resident 28) was provided with a clean, safe, and comfortable environment when: 1. The resident's call light button (a device that alerts healthcare staff for help in a facility) cord was damaged and cracked. In addition, the staff did not report the damaged and cracked call light button cord to maintenance for replacement. This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 28 from receiving assistance as needed. 2. The cabinet above the sink inside the bathroom had rust buildup on the bottom shelf. This failure had the potential to place Resident 28 at risk of living in an unkempt and un-homelike environment. Findings: 1. On July 23, 2024, at 10:34 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 28 in the resident's room, the call light button cord was found to be cracked and with exposed wires. Resident 28 stated he used the call light for help but was not aware his call light was damaged. On July 24, 2024, at 3:04 p.m., during a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTC Ombudsman - an agency reponsible for advocating on behalf of residents) of a discharge for one of two residents (Resident 39) reviewed for closed records. This failure had the potential to result in the LTC Ombudsman not to be informed about Resident 39's plan of care and condition. Findings: On July 25, 2024, Resident 39's record was reviewed. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis which included dementia (a group of brain disease that causes loss of memory) and Alzheimer's (a type of dementia). A review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated April 5, 2024, indicated, Resident 39 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (quick assessment to check a person's thinking, memory, and overall mental functioning) Score of 5 (severe cognitive impairment). A review of Resident 39's Discharge Summary Report, dated June 3, 2024, indicated, .discharged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, administered the medication Nifedipine (brand name of medication used for high blood pressure) ER (extended release) 20 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) as ordered by the physician for one of seven residents (Resident 10) observed for medication administration. This failure has the potential for the resident to not receive the full therapeutic effects of the medication. Findings: On July 24, 2024, at 9:34 a.m., a medication administration observation was conducted with LVN 1 on Resident 10. LVN 1 proceeded to prepare Resident 10's medications that included Nifedipine ER 20 mg one tablet. Indicated on the Nifedipine ER medication label instruction was to hold (not give) the medication if the systolic blood pressure reading (SBP- pressure in the arteries when the heart contracts) is less than 110 mmHg (millimeter of mercury - unit of measurement) and pulse rate is below 60 (normal pulse rate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, an edema (swelling caused by too much fluid in the tissues) on the left upper and left lower extremity was appropriately assessed and a care plan was initiated and developed, for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 24). This failure has the potential for the edema to not be monitored for complications and may also result to the delay in treatment of possible worsening symptoms. Findings: On July 23, 2024, at 10:34 a.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was condcuted with Resident 24. Resident 24 was alert, interviewable, and was sitting sitting on his wheelchair in the activities room. Resident 24's left arm and hand was observed to be swollen and not supported on the wheelchair arm rest. In a concurrent interview, Resident 24 stated the staff did not put any treatment, including elevating or icing, on his left arm and hand. On July 23, 2024, Resident 24's record was reviewed. Resident 24 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one of two residents (Resident 54), to address vision deficits when a recommendation for reading glasses was not followed up. This failure had the potential for Resident 54 to have a decline in his vision. Findings: On July 22, 2024, at 8:56 a.m., an interview with Resident 54 in his room, he stated he loved reading books and used to have readers. Resident 54 further stated having reading glasses could help him read better. A review of Resident 54's admission RECORD, printed date July 24, 2024, indicated, Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss). A review of Resident 54's History and Physical dated May 28, 2024, indicated the resident had the capacity to make own decisions. A review of Resident 54's physician's order, dated May 21, 2024, indicated, .Eye-Health and Vision Consult with Follow-Up Treatment as indicated . A review of Resident 54's document from the optometrist (a healthcare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the following medications were not stored readiliy available for use in the medication cart and medication room: - One bottle of Nutricia UTI Stat Liquid 30 FL Oz (Fluid Ounce - unit of measurement) 887 milliliters (unit of measurement) with an expiration date of [DATE]; - Four acetaminophen suppositories 650 milligrams (mg-unit of measurement) labeled for use on a resident that expired [DATE]; and - One vial of Comimaly Intramuscular Suspension 30 MCG (micrgogram- unit of measurent)/0.3ml (type of Covid{(highly contagious type of respiratory infection}vaccine ) labeled for use on a resident that was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. This failure has ther potential for the residents to receive expired and/or ineffective medications. Findings: On [DATE], at 11:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse 1 (RN) 1. RN 1 stated all medications stored in the medication cart one (1) was readily available for use. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to provide assistive devices such as plate guard (equipment to prevent food from falling off the plate), for two of eight residents (Resident 13 and Resident 58) observed during mealtime. This failure had the potential for Resident 13 and 58 not meeting the daily nutritional needs, which could lead to weight loss. Findings: a. On July 22, 2024, at 12:05 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with Resident 13 in the dining room. Resident 13 was observed scooping the food onto her plate but the food fell off the plate. She stated the food was spilling out of the plate and stated oops my food just fell. On July 24, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 was interviewed. LVN 6 stated, Resident 13 spilled food on the floor. LVN 6 stated, Resident 13 could eat by herself, a plate guard should have been provided to prevent food from spilling. On July 24, 2024, at 12:45 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated Residents13 should have been evaluated and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe and sanitary storage of personal food for one of one resident (Resident 56) when two expired bags of marshmallows were found inside the resident's closet and were readily available for consumption. This failure had the potential to place Resident 56 at risk for foodborne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food). Findings: On July 24, 2024, at 5:17 p.m., a review of Resident 56's medical records indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 56's History and Physical, dated November 5, 2023, indicated he had a fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. On July 23, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview inside Resident 56' room, two bags of expired marshmallows were found in the resident's closet. One of the bags was opened and had a hardened texture. Resident 56 stated the marshmallows were gifts from last Christmas (7 months ago).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were observed when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) 2, did not perform the appropriate hand hygiene prior to, in between, and after a resident contact during a blood sugar check and administration of insulin (medication used for high blood sugar) for one of seven residents observed (Resident 4); and 2. For one of two residents (Resident 347), when a Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) failed to perform hand hygiene and disinfect ankle weights used after providing care on the resident, who is on an enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - infection prevention and control practices that can help reduce the spread of infection). These deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and spread of diseases and infection to the facility staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: 1. On July 24, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 58) was offered the pneumococcal vaccine (vaccines against the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae [bacteria that can cause pneumonia]). This failure had the potential for Resident 58 not fully protected against pneumonia (infection of lungs). Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission RECORD, indicated, .Resident 58, is [AGE] year old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD-respiratory problem). On July 24, 2024, at 8:37 a.m., during a concurrent interview and review of Resident 58's immunization record, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated Resident 58 received one dose of pneumococcal (PPSV23) on april 24, 2023. The IP stated residents who received one dose of Pneumococcal (PPSV23) should be offerred a second dose of pneumococcal (PCV20) after one year. The IP further stated the facility follows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 2) whereabout was being frequently monitored. This failure potentially could have contributed for Resident 2 to be able to wander to Resident 1's room and was found on top of the resident on April 27, 2024. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s medical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated November 17, 2023, indicated Resident 2 had diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfered with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated March 29, 2024, indicated Resident 2 had severely impaired cognition. A review of Resident 2 ' s care plan dated May 16, 2022, indicated Resident 2 was . at risk for leaving safe area without authorization, leaves premises without authorization secondary to dementia as evidenced by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a legal document signed by the resident if with capacity to make decision or resident legal representative, and physician, that indicate a resident's preference for life sustaining treatment) was identifiable, accurate, and updated, for three of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2, 6, and 7). This failure had the potential for Residents 2, 6, and 7 to receive inappropriate or delayed treatment. Findings: 1. On April 24, 2024, Resident 2's record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including primary hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and syphilis (sexually transmitted disease caused by bacteria). The following documents of Resident 2 were reviewed: - The Physician's History and Physical, dated March 5, 2024, indicated Resident 2's decision making capacity was fluctuating; - The POLST, dated March 4, 2024, indicated, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative or surrogate decision maker (authorized individual to make healthcare decisions for the resident) was assigned for decision making, for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 7). This failure had the potential to result in medical services to not be coordinated in accordance with the resident's needs due to the lack of appropriate decision- making capacity and advocacy for the resident. Findings: On April 24, 2024, at 5:18 p.m., an interview with a concurrent record review was conducted with the Medical Records (MR). Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizophrenia (type of personality disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). The following documents of Resident 7 were reviewed with the MR: The Physician's History and Physical, dated March 15, 2024, indicated, .This resident .does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was monitored following an allegation of sexual abuse, for one of two sample residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 2 ' s physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: On February 6, 2024, an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. On February 6, 2024, at 11:58 a.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated, Resident 1 alleged Resident 2 had touched her breast and private area on January 23, 2024, at around 4 p.m. The DON further stated, Resident 1 and Resident 2 were monitored after the alleged abuse incident for emotional distress, changes in behavior, and bodily injuries. A review of Resident 2 records indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included altered mental status. A review of Resident 2's History and Physical, dated June 7, 2023, indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three sampled residents (Resident B), treatments were completed, as ordered, for a right hip surgical wound. This failure had the potential to delay wound healing, increase the risk of complications and further infections for Resident B. Findings: On November 14, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an allegation of abuse. On November 14, 2023, Resident B ' s medical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the right hip and Hepatitis C (an infection in the liver caused by a virus). A review of Resident B ' s History and Physical, indicated Resident B has the capacity to make decisions. A review of Resident B ' s Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated November 2023, indicated the following: .Treatment R (right) hip surgical wound: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry apply TAO (triple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two of three residents (Resident A, Resident B), the following: 1) Resident A, a care plan was developed with specific goals and interventions addressing the Resident A's dementia ; and 2) Resident B, monitoring of behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions were implemented prior to starting psychotropic medication. These failures had the potential to result in inconsistent and inadequate management of care for both residents. Findings: On June 28, 2023, at 10:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a facility reported incident. 1) On June 28, 2023, Resident A's record was reviewed. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) and dementia (thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily functioning). A review of Resident A ' s, History and Physical, indicated Resident A does not have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for addressing the resident's hearing problem for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life, inability to communicate his needs effectively, and staff not being aware of the resident's care needs. Findings: On May 23, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of an allegation of abuse. On May 23, 2023, at 10:51 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated, he could not hear well. Resident 1 stated, he needed hearing aids. Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality) and sensorineural hearing loss (caused by damage to the inner ear) bilateral (both). A review of Resident 1's ENT (a medical specialist that focuses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment for the residents and visitors when one out of one dumpster garbage bin located outside the kitchen was overflowing with trash, and the deformed (bent) lid was not securely closed. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and the visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: During the kitchen initial tour on January 23, 2023, at 10:09 a.m., one dumpster bin located outside the facility's kitchen was observed overflowing with trash and the lid was not securely closed. In addition, the dumpster lid was observed deformed (bent) and would not close tightly to prevent rodents or pests from entry. A concurrent interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), she stated the trash should not be overflowing and the lid should be securely closed. On January 24, 2023, at 3:39 p.m., the Registered Dietitian (RD) was interviewed. The RD stated the trash should not overflow and the dumpster lid should completely close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 31's closet space was free from belongings left by a resident who had been discharged . This failure had the potential to inhibit Resident 31's ability to have adequate closet space for her belongings. Findings: On January 23, 2023, at 8:40 a.m., Resident 31's closet was found to contain personal belongings of another resident. On January 23, 2023, at 8:49 a.m., an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, was conducted. LVN 1 stated if a resident is no longer in the room, all personal belongings should be removed. On January 23, 2023, at 8:53 a.m., an interview with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was conducted. CNA 1 stated, when residents are discharged all personal belongings should be sent with them, donated, or thrown away. CNA 1 further stated a discharged resident's personal belongings should not be left in the closet. On January 23, 2023, at 8:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with The Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated the belonging's left in Resident 31's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper behavior monitoring was implemented for the use of Provera (medication to treat behavior in men) medication for one of five residents (Resident 50) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medication (medication which affects behavior). This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings: On January 25, 2022, Resident 50's record was reviewed. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's (brain disorder), depressive disorder (mood disorder), anxiety disorder (mood disorder), schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder), and psychosis (mental health disorder). Resident 50 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 06 (impaired mental status). The Progress Notes dated, November 13, 2022, at 4:38 p.m., indicated, Pharmacy recommendations noted with MD (doctor) notified with new order for monitoring inappropriate sexually (sic)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of twenty-nine opportunities observed during medication administration were free from a medication error rate of five percent or more when: 1. Lidoderm patch (medication for pain) was not removed as scheduled per the physician order; and 2. Albuterol inhaler (medication to help with breathing) was not administered as recommended by the manufacturer's instructions. These failures resulted in a mediation error rate of 6.9% and could potentially result in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication. Findings: 1. On January 24, 2023, at 9:14 a.m., during medication administration, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed. Resident 446 was noted with a white patch on his lower back. LVN 1 removed white patch and then applied a new Lidoderm patch on Resident 446's lower back. On January 24, 2023, Resident 446's record was reviewed. Resident 446 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to the facility's policy and procedure and per state and federal requirements when: 1. Diclofenac gel (medication for pain) had the incorrect drug label on the medication when compared to the physician's order; and 2. Two multi-dose vials of Tuberculin for injection had an opened date that was expired. These failures had the potential for medication error to occur or medication to be used with less efficacy. 1.On [DATE], at 9:36 a.m., during medication administration observation, License Vocation Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed preparing diclofenac gel 1% for Resident 31. The diclofenac gel label indicated, .Apply 2 gm (gram- unit of measurement) topically to left shoulder . LVN 1 was observed to apply diclofenac gel to Resident 31's right shoulder. On [DATE], at 3:11 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review with LVN 1 were conducted. LVN 1 stated the diclofenac gel 1% was to be applied topically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed during the lunch meal on January 24, 2023, when: 1. Resident 18, with CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrate Diet - a meal plan consisting of having the same amount of carbohydrates every day), low fat and low cholesterol diet (a diet that helps reduce the risk of heart disease), received one whole slice of wheat bread instead of half a slice of wheat bread; and 2. Resident 63, with regular low fat and low cholesterol diet, received regular chicken jambalaya with sausage, instead of the chicken jambalaya without sausage. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the medical and nutritional status of Residents 18 and 63. Findings: 1. During an observation of the lunch meal service on January 24, 2023, beginning at 11:55 a.m., the dietary staff was observed to serve one whole slice of wheat bread instead of half a slice of wheat bread, for Resident 18. A concurrent review of the undated facility document titled, Winter Menus Week 4 TUESDAY 1/24/23, indicated residents with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper dishwashing procedure was completed when several various sized metal pans were stacked and stored wet. This failure had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population who consumed food in the facility. The facility census was 80. Findings: On January 23, 2023, at 9:16 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, one three-quarter (3/4) sheet metal pan, two half (1/2) sheet metal pan, and one, one-third (1/3) sheet metal pan were observed stacked wet and stored in the storage area for clean, dry, and ready for use items. On January 23, 2023, at 9:19 a.m., the [NAME] was interviewed. The [NAME] verified the various sized metal pans were wet. The [NAME] stated the metal pans should have been completely dried before they were be stored. On January 23, 2023, at 9:50 p.m., the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was interviewed. The CDM stated the dishes, pots, and pans should all be completely air-dried before storing them away. On January 24, 2023, at 3:39 p.m., a follow-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$77,191 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $32,312 — penalty dated 2025-08-29
  • $21,739 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
  • $23,140 — penalty dated 2024-10-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 5California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 5Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 5Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 5Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 5Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 5Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Santa Fe LodgeEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 3 of 5Green Acres Healthcare CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 5 of 5Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Pico Rivera Healthcare CenterPico Rivera, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
KLAVAN, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN, LIBBYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
NOTIS, SHMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF15%since 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, IRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
CASTILLO, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024
KLAVAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/1986
MANGOBA, MELANCHTONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2015
TAN, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2025
PERVAIZ, ZAIDIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
ADF ENTERPRISES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$910K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 6%Other / private 8%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $910K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,992per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$274per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555135. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next