No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Santa Fe Lodge

5053 Peck Rd., El Monte, CA 91732 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 46 certified beds · (626) 448-4248 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0603) — cited Jan 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Jan 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
117 E Live Oak Ave 101 · (626) 446-8492 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs1.1 mi
11574 Lower Azusa Rd · (626) 350-3550 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
298 E Live Oak Ave · (626) 446-1902 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3371 Peck Rd · (626) 334-1065 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4064 E Live Oak Ave · (626) 447-2126

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.9%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.3%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.5%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.792.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.531.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.7–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 4.6–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
41.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 44.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-08)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-19 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 10 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) were free from involuntary seclusion (separation of a resident from other residents or from her/his room or confinement to her/his room with or without roommates against the resident's will, or the will of the resident representative) by failing to: 1. Ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 did not use two utility/linen carts (material handling cart used for bedding, linens, and other supplies) to block the entrance/exit (only one entrance and exit) to Resident 1, 2, and 3's Room (RM 1) after CNA 1 witnessed Resident 1 spilling liquid on the floor. As a result, CNA 1 violated Resident 1, 2 and 3's rights and prohibited (not allowed) Residents 1, 2, and 3 from leaving RM [ROOM NUMBER]. These deficient practices had the potential for psychosocial (mental, emotional, social, and spiritual effects) harm, serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death to Residents 1, 2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific and individualized care plan (CP) for one of two (Resident 1) sampled resident that addressed Resident 1's wandering, into other resident rooms, behavior.This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet individualized needs for Resident 1 and the potential to affect Resident 1's physical and psychosocial well-being.Cross Reference F689Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Facesheet (FS, admission record), the FS indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/28/2026 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), encephalopathy (broad term for any disease, damage, or malfunction of the brain).During a review of Resident 1's CP, initiated 5/1/2026, the CP indicated Resident 1 was at risk for purposeless wandering and potential for self-injury. The CP did not indicate Resident 1 wandered into other resident rooms or any interventions to prevent the behavior from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a history of wandering (walking aimlessly with no specific direction) into other resident rooms.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 wandering into Resident 2's room on 6/13/2026 and Resident 1 getting close to Resident 2 leading to Resident 2 scratching Resident 1's left upper lip.Cross Reference F656Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Facesheet (FS, admission record), the FS indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/28/2026 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), encephalopathy (broad term for any disease, damage, or malfunction of the brain).During a review of Resident 1's care plan (CP), initiated 5/1/2026, the CP indicated resident one was at risk for unavoidable decline related to dementia. The CP's interventions indicated to provide a safe environment to Resident 1.During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents and/or the residents' responsible parties (RP) were informed in advance, of the risk and benefits of psychotropic medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) for two of five sampled residents (Residents 7 an 8) when:1. Resident 7's Quetiapine (Seroquel) was restarted on 3/26/2026 without an informed consent (IC-a form indicating a resident or responsible party voluntarily agree to a medical treatment or procedure after understanding the risks, benefits, and alternatives) after the Quetiapine was discontinued on 10/3/2025.2. Resident 8 did not have and IC for Lexapro (a medication used to treat mental health disorders), trazodone (a medication used to treat mental health disorders and insomnia [difficulty falling asleep]) and olanzapine indicating the correct dosage (a medication used to treat mental health disorders) prior to 3/25/2026. These deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for psychotropic medications titled, Psychotherapeutic Medications, undated for two of two residents (Residents 1 and 7) by: A. failing to monitor for side effects of Resident 1's mirtazapine (medication used to treat depression.)B. failing to have adequate indication for the use Seroquel for Resident 7 (Quetiapine -Quetiapine is FDA approved for schizophrenia [mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand what is real], acute manic episodes [ A manic episode is a stretch of time when you have one or more symptoms of mania. An episode typically lasts for a week or longer, unless treatment cuts it short] and monitor a specific behavior for it's use.These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 7 to experience unwanted side effects that could affect their physical wellbeing.Findings: A. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, (AR) the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reduce the potential for accidents and/or hazards for two of two residents (Residents 23 and 34) by failing to ensure:1. Resident 23's bed-exit alarm (designed to inform staff by letting them know when a person is attempting to leave the bed, has gotten out of bed. Whether directly attached to the resident as a garment clip or position change alarm, or part of the bed itself [e.g., pressure-sensitive mats, bedside infrared beam detectors, or in-bed pressure sensors] was kept in a place where the alarm could easily be heard by staff and was not muffled. 2. A spray bottle of bleach was not left unattended at Resident 34's bedside table. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 23's fall on 5/5/2026 and had the potential to cause harm to Resident 34. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 3/8/2026, with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 13) received the right amount of water flush and enteral feeding via gastrostomy feeding tube (G-tube - a device used for providing nutrition directly to the stomach) as ordered by the physician.These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 13 to experience further weight loss and dehydration. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 1/15/2014 and readmitted the resident on 4/16/2026, with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (FTT-is characterized by unexplained weight loss, malnutrition and disability. FTT has been associated with multiple primary conditions (e.g., infections and malignancies), but always includes 2 defining clinical elements, namely nutritional impairment and disability), acute kidney failure (the kidneys are operating at less than 10 percent of normal function which means…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 7) were free from unnecessary medications:1.For Resident 4, the resident did not meet the Mc Geer's criteria (a criteria used to define true infections by providing surveillance criteria the Infection Preventionist (IP) is required to report for definitive case events (i.e., diagnosed infections) and to estimate the actual incidence/prevalence of disease conditions) for the use of Levaquin on 3/19/2026 and ciprofloxacin on 4/22/2026 for true infections. 2. For Resident 7, there was no behavior monitoring for Resident 7 when Resident 7 was prescribed Seroquel (Quetiapine -Quetiapine is FDA approved for schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand what is real), acute manic episodes ( A manic episode is a stretch of time when you have one or more symptoms of mania. An episode typically lasts for a week or longer, unless treatment cuts it short). There was no specific behavior indicated on the order for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage practices at one of one nurse's station when the residents' (in general) food from home refrigerator was observed with debris and dried liquid on the shelves for two consecutive days.This failure had the potential to result in pests and cross-contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) placing residents (in general) at risk and significantly impacting the residents' health.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/7/2026 at 1 PM with the Certified Dietary Manger (CDM), in the Nurse's Station, the residents' (in general) food from home refrigerator was observed with debris on two shelves and dried brown liquid on the main bottom shelf along with dried brown liquid on the side shelf. The CDM stated this was the refrigerator where residents' food from home was stored. The CDM stated the refrigerator was not clean. Additionally, the CDM stated the importance of keeping the refrigerator clean was to prevent cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's antibiotic stewardship program (a coordinated healthcare initiative designed to promote the most appropriate, safe, and effective use of antibiotics [medication that kills or stops bacteria from reproducing]) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) by failing to,A. Ensure Mc Geer's criteria (a standardized, evidence-based definitions used to identify and track infections in long-term care facilities, allows healthcare workers to accurately count and monitor infections) for infection surveillance was met for Resident 4 for the use of the Levaquin (antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections).B. Ensure Resident 4 was not administered Ciprofloxacin when Resident 4's urine culture and sensitivity (C&S, a two-part laboratory procedure used to diagnose infections) result indicated Resident 4 was resistant (bacteria has changed so antibiotic drugs can no longer kill them or stop the growth, the bacteria causing the infection has adapted, making the disease harder to treat)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide discharge notification documentation for one of one sampled resident (Resident 49) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, when Resident 49's Notice of proposed transfer and discharge (a document a nursing facility must give a resident and/or their representative before the resident is moved out of the facility, explaining why the resident is being discharged , where they are going, the effective date, their right to appeal, and how to contact the State Long Term Care Ombudsman [an advocate who helps protect the rights, safety, and well-being of residents in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities]) was not given to the Ombudsman following Resident 49's discharge on [DATE].This failure resulted in the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman being uninformed of Resident 49's discharge and had the potential to result in Resident 49's discharge needs not being met.Findings:During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident's (Resident 1) diagnosis of depression was accurately reflected in the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/14/2026.This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate Medical Record for Resident 1 and had the potential for Resident 1 to have unmet needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, (AR) the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including depression (mood disorder causing persistent sadness, emptiness, or irritability, along with loss of interest in activities once enjoyed), anxiety (persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable fear or worry that interferes with daily life) and dementia (a gradual decline in mental ability usually caused by a brain disease.)During a review of Resident 1's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 had impaired cognition (ability to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a liquified diet was served as ordered by the physician for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) who had a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).The deficient practice had the potential to result in complications like aspiration pneumonia (lung infection [the invasion and growth of germs in the body] caused by inhaling foreign substances like food into the airways rather than swallowing them), choking, and a physical decline to Resident 3.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 6/9/2016, with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and dysphagia. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 3/7/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 3 had severe cognitive (the ability to think and process information) deficit and was dependent with activities of daily living such as eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene.During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure three of six sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1, CNA 2, and Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 1) understood the facility's Policies and Procedures (P&P) on abuse reporting when:1. CNA 1, CNA 2, and LVN 1 did not know who the facility's Abuse Coordinator (a designated staff member responsible for managing and addressing issues related to abuse or neglect within the facility) was.2. CNA 1, CNA 2, and LVN 1 did not know that allegations of abuse must be reported to the California Department of Public Health (the Department), the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and to the local law enforcement within 2 hours.This failure had the potential for residents (in general) to be subjected to abuse while residing at the facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/2/2026 with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (the Department), the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) and to the local law enforcement, within two hours, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised 11/28/2022.This failure resulted in a delay in notification to the Department, the Ombudsman, and local law enforcement, and had the potential for Resident 1 to be subjected to abuse while at the facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/2/2026 with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), impulse disorder (a repeated failure to resist urges, behaviors, or temptations that cause harm to oneself or others), and hypertension (high blood pressure).During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow through (follow up) on one of four sampled resident's (Resident 1), who was at risk for falls, fall that occurred on 1/9/2026, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change of Condition. The facility failed to assess Resident 1 after the fall, report the fall to Resident 1's physician (Medical Doctor [MD] 1), and complete a change in condition (COC, an alteration in a resident's physical health that differs from their previous baseline) for Resident 1.This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving the necessary care and services affecting Resident 1's physical well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including other abnormalities of gait (the pattern of walking) and mobility (ability to move freely), unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consents were obtained for one of one sampled resident (Resident 94) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Informed Consent and Alarm Monitor, by failing to: a. Ensure an informed consent was completed prior to the use of the bed/wheelchair alarms (a safety device, often a sensor pad or clip, that alerts caregivers when a patient attempts to leave their bed or chair, helping to prevent falls and injuries) b. Ensure informed consents were completed prior to the use of Lexapro (anti-depressant, medication used to treat depression [serious illness that negatively affects how one feels, thinks and acts]) and Remeron (medication used to treat depression). These failures resulted in violation of Resident 94/responsible party's right to understand Resident 94's treatment, including the risks and benefits of the medications and the purpose of the use of the alarms. Additionally, the failures had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and ensure Advance Directives (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) were kept in 3 of 5 sampled resident's (Residents 14, 145, 38) medical records. This failure had the potential to cause confusion among the healthcare providers in the event Residents 14, 145 and 38 required immediate medical care and/treatment and had the potential for the residents to receive inadequate or medically unnecessary care and/or treatment or services regarding life-sustaining treatment. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance (a mental health condition characterized by a loss of contact with reality,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights for three of three sampled residents (Resident 34, 28, and 145) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Weight Change, as evidenced by: A. Resident 34's weight was not taken upon readmission to the facility on 3/14/2025 and not taken on 3/18/2025 per the physician order. B. Resident 28 weight was not taken weekly as ordered by the physician. C. Resident 145's weight was not taken on 3/18/2025 as per the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in physical declines to Residents 34, 28, and 145 due to untreated weight loss. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 34 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including heart failure (the inability of the heart to pump blood effectively) and dementia (a gradual decline in mental ability usually caused by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure proper food storage, in one of one kitchen walk-in refrigerator (Refrigerator 1), consistent with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Refrigerator/Freezer Storage, by failing to: a. Ensure a transparent container with sliced cheese was labeled with an open date (date to indicate when it was opened). b. Ensure a halfway-filled pickle jar was labeled with an open date. c. Ensure two unopened plastics of whipping cream were labeled with a received date. These failures had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (illness caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages) to the residents consuming the facility's food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/2025 at 8:58 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) inside Refrigerator 1, the following items were found, 1. A transparent container that had sliced cheese and the container was not dated or labeled with the date when it was opened. 2. An undated halfway-filled bottle jar with hamburger pickles. 3. Two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its binding arbitration agreements (AA, a contractual promise where parties agree to resolve disputes through arbitration instead of litigation) included a selection that allowed the residents or their responsible parties/resident representatives to communicate with federal, state, or local officials for two of two sampled residents (Residents 34 and 38). This failure had the potential to violate Resident 34 and Resident 38's rights and result in unjust arbitration. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 34 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) and anxiety (intense, excessive, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body) prevention and control practices for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 14, 16, 38, 40, 18 and 34) by failing to ensure: a. personal toiletries and resident care items were labeled and not stored inside the [NAME] and [NAME] restroom (a restroom that has two doors and is sandwiched between two bedrooms and is accessible by both bedrooms) of Residents 14, 16, 38 and 40. b. communal drinks were not accessible for Resident 18 to pour water by himself. c. the lint traps for 2 of 3 sampled dryers (Dryer 1 and Dryer 2) were kept clean and did not have a heavy thick accumulation of lint. d. Resident 34's bed sheets were clean from smeared stool. e. Proper storage/disposal of a used cup set on top of the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of infection and physical declines to Residents 14, 16, 38, 40, 18, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 145) was treated with dignity by failing to provide privacy and failing to cover Resident 145's right flank (the area on the side of the body between the ribs and the hip) while Resident 145 was in the shower chair. This deficient practice resulted in exposure of Resident 145's right flank to Resident 145's right thigh and had the potential to result in a psychosocial decline to Resident 145. Findings: During a review of Resident 145's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 145 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistent, excessive fear or worry that significantly interferes with daily life), unspecified and unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 14) call light (a device used by a resident to signal the need for assistance) was within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 14's needs to not be met in a timely manner and/or the potential for Resident 14 to experience harm if Resident 14 was unable to alert staff during an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance (a mental health condition characterized by a loss of contact with reality, leading to distorted perceptions, thoughts, and behaviors), mood disturbance (a significant change in a person's emotional state that persists for an extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment after a significant change in condition for one of one sampled resident (Resident 41) to include a bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes clear shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration) diagnosis as indicated in Resident 41's physician order for Depakote (medication used to treat certain psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet needs for Resident 41. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted the resident on 12/10/2024 with multiple diagnosis including dementia (a gradual decline in mental ability usually caused by a brain disease) and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest or pleasure in activities,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an evaluation for Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal assessment requirement to help ensure individuals who have mental disorders or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) for one of one sampled resident (Residents 43). This failure had the potential to result in unmet individualized services to Resident 43. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility 11/12/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a collection of blood that accumulates between the outer and middle layer of the brain's protective membranes after a head injury), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness), and hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes clear shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 41). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Residents 41 not to receive the necessary care and services according to Resident 41's specific needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted the resident on 12/10/2024 with multiple diagnosis including dementia (a gradual decline in mental ability usually caused by a brain disease) and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest or pleasure in activities, significantly impacting daily functioning). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was at risk for elopement (when a resident leaves the facility without authorization) was monitored in the hallway and re-directed away from the exit door as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safety of Residents. Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 10/19/2024 without being noticed by staff and was not found until 10/21/2024. Resident 1 sustained a skin abrasion (scrape) above the left elbow. This deficient practice had the potential to result in serious bodily injury and physical decline to Resident 1 during the time Resident 1 was absent from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of mental skills that affect daily life and cause problems with memory, thinking and planning) and major depressive disorder (mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's temperature was in an acceptable range as indicated, in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Homelike Environment, for six resident's rooms, one dining room, and one hallway out of 23 resident's rooms, two dining rooms, and two hallways. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents, visitors, and staff members at risk for serious illness, harm, and/or death. Findings: During an interview on 9/10/2024 at 4:29 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the facility's air conditioner for the middle part of the nursing unit was broken. The DON stated the air conditioner had malfunctioned since 9/9/2024. The DON stated they started fixing it this morning (9/10/2024) and were providing fans to the residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/10/2024 at 4:40 PM with the Maintenance Director 1 (MD 1), MD 1 stated the facility's acceptable temperature range was 71…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for two of two sampled residents (Residents 15 and 11) when: a. For Resident 15, The facility failed to develop a care plan that included interventions to address Resident 15's urinary incontinence (loss of bladder control). b. For Resident 11, the facility failed to develop a care plan that included goals and interventions to address Resident 11's rash located on Resident 11's left and right buttocks. This failure had the potential to result in unmet individualized needs for Residents 15 and 11 and the potential to affect the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. (Cross reference F690 and F580) Findings: a. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for two of two sampled residents (Residents 41 and 18) by failing to: a. For resident 41, the facility failed to review the comprehensive care plan for falls, as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Initial Fall Risk Assessment. b. For Resident 18, the facility failed to ensure bilateral knee extension splints (B knee splints, material used to extend or straighten the knees as much as possible) and left ankle pressure-relieving ankle foot orthosis (L PRAFO, device to maintain foot/ankle stability while in bed) care plans (CPs) for Resident 18, who had range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and mobility limitations, were in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure had the potential to result in unmet individualized needs for Residents 41 and 18 due to outdated inadequate interventions and had the potential to result in a decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures (P&P) regarding the role of the interdisciplinary team (IDT, staff with varied clinical backgrounds-including nursing staff and resident's physician-that combine experience and knowledge when evaluating the resident's strengths, needs, and preferences to attain the best quality of care and life for the resident), for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 1), who lacked the capacity to make healthcare decisions by failing to: Ensure the IDT consisted of Resident 1's attending physician (MD), registered nurse (RN) responsible for the resident, responsible party (RP), and other appropriate staff in accordance with the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 1's physical or psychosocial well-being related to inadequate representation of the different disciplines in the care planning process. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the facility readmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 11) physician was notified of the development of a rash on Resident 11's left and right buttocks. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in treatment and/or services and could result in a physical decline to Resident 11. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness and schizophrenia (a mental disorder effecting how a person thinks and feels). During a review of a History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/19/24, the H&P indicated Resident 11 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of a MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 11 was dependent (helper does all the effort) with eating, oral hygiene, toilet hygiene, showers, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and required substantial to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN, notice of liability) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letters/forms to one of one sampled resident (Resident 196) three days prior to Resident 196's last day covered as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Understanding Medicare Denial Letters,. This deficient practice had the potential to result with Resident 196 to not be aware of possible charges for services rendered that were not covered after the last Medicare coverage day. Findings: During a review of Resident 192's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 192 was admitted to the facility 6/27/23 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait (walk). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and screening tool), dated 12/28/23 the MDS indicated Resident 192's cognition (ability to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the functional limitation in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) of one of two sampled residents (Resident 18) with mobility and ROM limitations, was complete and accurate. This failure had the potential to lead to Resident 18's worsened contractures and increased risks for pain and skin breakdown related to incorrect treatments and plan of care. Cross reference with F688 and F657 Findings: A. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 18 on 10/19/2023 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with daily activities), syncope (fainting) and collapse, anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 18's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/21/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 18 did not have the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility staff failed to administer Simbrinza 1% - 2% (brinzolamide/brimonidine tartrate, eye drops to treat glaucoma [progressive eye disease causing vision loss and blindness due to the damage to the optic nerve]), in accordance with the professional standards of practice to one of one sampled resident (Resident 7), who was selected for medication administration observation. This failure had the potential to result in worsened vision to Resident 7 due to decreased medication efficacy (ability of the medication to produce the maximal desired effect) due to the systemic absorption of the eye drops and/or subtherapeutic dose (concentration of a drug lower than what is usually prescribed to treat a disease effectively). Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 7 on 2/4/2010 with multiple diagnoses including glaucoma, cataract (clouding of the eye lens causing cloudy, blurry, or unclear vision), astigmatism (imperfection of eye curvature causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 9) was provided a communication tool or resources to effectively communicate Resident 9's needs when Resident 9 spoke Cantonese (a Chinese dialect). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 9's needs not effectively conveyed to facility staff which could lead to a decline in Resident 9's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of an admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia (a deficiency when the body does not have enough iron) and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). During a review of Resident 9's care plan (CP), titled Language Barrier: Vietnamese speaking, non-English speaking, initiated 6/6/16 and revised on 5/24/21, the CP's interventions indicated the facility would provide Vietnamese speaking staff to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 18) with limited mobility or range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) by failing to: A. Ensure an accurate assessment of Resident 18's ROM on both upper extremities (BUEs) on 10/20/2023. B. Properly assess Resident 18's tolerance to the right elbow extension splint (R elbow splint, material used to extend or straighten the elbow as much as possible) after the resident readmitted to the facilltiy on 10/19/2023. C. Ensure the order for the Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, certified nursing aide who helps residents maintain their function and joint mobility) to apply the splints to both knees (B knees) and left ankle (L ankle), dated 12/4/2023, was in accordance with Resident 18's tolerance to splints upon discharge from rehab therapy. These failures had the potential to cause a further decline in Resident 18's mobility and ROM with worsened contractures (chronic joint stiffness) and increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of the resident) failed to accurately assess a resident's fall risk and reassess fall prevention interventions quarterly for one of one sampled resident (Resident 41) who was at high risk of falling, as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures (P&P). These failures had the potential to result in harm and Resident 41 to sustain injury and/or harm due to falls. (Cross reference F657) Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and colostomy (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment to restore continence, to the extent possible, by failing to implement a prompted toileting program (caregiver prompts the resident to use the toilet) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 15). This failure had the potential to result in incontinence and urinary tract infections (UTIs, an infection in any part of the urinary system [system of organs that makes urine]) to Resident 15. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy consultant recommendations were followed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 9). The facility did not act upon recommendations to include ferritin/iron panel (a lab test that determines if the body has enough iron in the cells) in Resident 9's routine labs. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a physical decline to Resident 9. Findings: During a review of an admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia (a deficiency when the body does not have enough iron) and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care-screening tool), dated 2/9/24, indicated Resident 9 needed supervision for touching assistance with sit to lying (moves from lying flat to sitting in bed) and sit to standing (sting in a chair to standing).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Lithium (medication used to treat mood disorders) level (blood drawn to check the Lithium level in the blood and determine if the level is within the therapeutic range [quantitative measurement of the relative safety of a drug], subtherapeutic [concentration of a drug lower than what is usually prescribed to treat a disease effectively], or indicating Lithium toxicity[an adverse drug reaction due to increased drug concentration in the blood]) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6) was obtained as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to cause lithium toxicity, worsened behavioral symptoms due to not enough drug in the blood, and a decline in Resident 6's physical and psychological well-being due to a delay in services. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 6 on 2/5/10 with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (progressive disorder affecting the nervous system and the body parts controlled by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date one opened bag of egg noodles and two open bags of chips in one of one food storage rooms (Food Storage room [ROOM NUMBER]), according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Labeling: Food. This failure had the potential to result in residents to experience food-borne illnesses (illnesses caused by contaminated food). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/4/24 at 10 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in Food Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], three bags of opened foods were observed. There was one undated half full bag of egg noodles, one undated opened bag of tortilla chips, and one undated opened bag of potato chips all sitting on a shelf. The CDM stated the bags needed to be dated when opened to ensure kitchen staff used the bag before the food went bad. The CDM stated residents could get sick if served expired food. During a review of the facility's undated P&P titled, Labeling: Food, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6) were complete and accurate. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to inconsistent and/or inaccurate treatments provided. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 6 on 2/5/10 with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (progressive disorder affecting the nervous system and the body parts controlled by the nerves), and convulsions (uncontrolled shaking of the body). During a review of Resident 6's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/20/24, the H&P indicated Resident 6 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment and care-planning tool), dated 2/16/24, the MDS indicated Resident 6 had severe impairment in cognition (ability to understand and process information). The MDS indicated Resident 6 required supervision or touching assistance (staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the signed binding arbitration agreement (BAA, contract between the facility and resident requiring disputes to be resolved by an arbitrator [third party decision-maker] instead of a judge or jury in court) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 40 and 18) provided for following: A. For Resident 40, the signed BAA failed to provide for the selection of a convenient venue (location to carry out arbitration proceedings agreed upon and suitable to both parties) and a neutral arbitrator (impartial or unbiased third-party decision maker, contracted with, and agreed to by both parties to resolve their dispute). B. For Resident 18, the signed BAA failed to provide for the selection of a convenient venue and a neutral arbitrator. These failures had a potential to result in a decline in the residents' physical and/or psychosocial condition due to the possible hardships related to arbitration proceedings. Findings: A. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement its Infection Control Program to prevent the transmission of disease and infection for one of two sampled resident (Resident 41) when CNA 2 failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) while CNA 2 provided care to Resident 41 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria and viruses [organisms that cause disease] from one surface to another) and the spread of infection to Resident 41. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device used by a resident to signal the need for assistance) system was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 41) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Call Lights. This failure had the potential to result in unmet needs for Resident 41 or the potential to result in Resident 41 to experience harm if Resident 41 was unable to alert staff during an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and colostomy (an operation that creates an opening for the colon, or large intestine, through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement the care plan (CP) for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was walking around the facility, spilling liquid on the floor. This failure resulted in Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 barricading (improvised barrier erected to prevent or delay of movement of residents getting through) Residents 1 ' s doorway with two utility/linen carts (material handling cart used for bedding, linens, and other supplies) to block the entrance/exit (only one trance and exit). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 1 to experience further incidents of involuntary seclusion that could lead to psychosocial (mental, emotional, social, and spiritual effects) harm, serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. (Cross reference F603) Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 20 out of 23 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ,16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24) met the minimum requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measure) per resident in bedrooms with more than one resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not to have enough room or inability to move freely throughout their rooms and limit the space for facility staff to provide necessary services and treatments. Findings: During a review of the facility's Resident Listing Report, (RLR) dated 3/17/2025, the RLR indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] had four residents in one room. During a review of the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis, (CAA), dated 3/17/2025, the CAA indicated the following rooms were less than 80 sq. ft. per resident: Room No. No. of beds: Room Size: Floor Area: 1 2 14 ft. x 10 ft. 140 sq. ft. 2 2 14 ft. x 10 ft. 140 sq. ft. 3 2 14 ft. x 10 ft. 140 sq. ft. 4 2 14 ft.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 20 of 23 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24). Nineteen resident rooms: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 had two beds inside each room and one resident room: 24, had four beds inside the room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not to have enough room or move freely throughout their rooms and limit the space for facility staff to provide services and treatments for the residents residing in the rooms. Findings: During an observation of the initial tour of the facility on 3/4/24, between 11 a.m., to 12:30 p.m., 20 rooms (rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24) were observed and did not meet the requirement of 80 square feet (sq./ft.) per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 5California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 5Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 5Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 5Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 5Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 5Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Highland Springs Care CenterBeaumont, CA 2 of 5Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 3 of 5Green Acres Healthcare CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 5 of 5Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Pico Rivera Healthcare CenterPico Rivera, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, IRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
ESTANDARTE, NOELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2023
KLAVAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/1986
MARAMBA, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025
ZHANG, YANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1966
FRIEDMAN, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
KLAVAN, RACHELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LEHMANN, LIBBYIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
NOTIS, SHMUELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
FLT ACQUISITIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
PERVAIZ, ZAIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$223K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 9%Other / private 1%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $223K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$281per resident / day
operating cost
$8,549per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$280per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555106. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next