Sunnyview Care Center
2000 W Washington Bl, Los Angeles, CA 90018 · For profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (323) 735-5146 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,146 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-25)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.07 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
29.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 29.6%CMS range 19.5–43.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.8–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 6.1–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Identifying Abuse which indicated the facility did not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 physically assaulting Resident 1, causing serious injuries such as a swelling to the right side of Resident 1's forehead, and a zygomatic arch fracture (a break in the cheekbone). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), bilateral hearing loss (hearing loss in both ears), type 2 diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and hypercalcemia (a condition in which the calcium level in the blood becomes too high). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform and consult with the resident ' s physician when a resident experienced a significant change of condition ([COC] a clinical deviation from a resident's baseline) for one of three sample residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 experienced a decline with vital signs (clinical measurements, specifically heart rate, temperature, respiration rate [breathing rate], and blood pressure [BP- the amount of pressure in the arteries during contraction of the heart], that indicated the state of a person's essential body functions) that were not within normal limit. Resident 1 ' s BP was at 96/42 millimeter of mercury (mmHg-unit of measurement) below Resident 1 ' s baseline (104 to148 systolic [when the heart muscle contracts) and 56 to 86 diastolic [when the heart muscle relaxes]) heart rate 117 beats per minute (bpm) normal reference range (NRR) was between 60 to 100 bpm, oxygen (O2-a colorless, odorless reactive gas, and the life-supporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the information on the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) related to Health Conditions, was accurately documented to reflect Resident 1's fall on 1/16/2026. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate facility quality measures and could result in Resident 1 not receiving necessary care and services. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a collection of blood in the brain caused by head trauma), repeated falls, restlessness and agitation.During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/10/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the mental capacity to understand but could not make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 1's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive (ability to think and reason) impairment, no acute change in mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents which indicated the facility would ensure interventions to reduce accident risks would be implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to provide one on one sitter (1:1- one staff delegated to supervise a single resident) for Resident 1 according to the residents care plan and Physician's Order.This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining an unwitnessed fall on 1/16/2026 and had the potential to cause injuries or hospitalization for the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a collection of blood in the brain caused by head trauma), repeated falls, restlessness and agitation.During a review of Resident 1's Rehab Fall Risk Assessment, dated 1/9/2026, the assessment indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transportation was notified of 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1) pick-up time after hemodialysis treatment every Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having to wait for transportation for long periods of time after hemodialysis treatments.This failure also resulted in the hemodialysis center to utilize an Uber (a company that connects riders with drivers, couriers, and delivery providers through a smartphone app) transportation to take the resident back to the facility.This failure had the potential for Resident to experience being tired, uncomfortable, hungry and placed the resident's health and safety in jeopardy.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis (a medical condition in which a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Skin Breakdown when licensed nurses did not perform weekly skin progress reports for one of four residents (Resident 1) who had moisture-associated skin damage (MASD - skin damage caused from prolonged exposure to moisture).This failure had the potential to result in the worsening of Resident 1's MASD and a delay in care or services for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), generalized muscle weakness (lack of strength), and candidiasis (a common fungal skin infection caused by yeast, appearing as red, itchy rashes) of skin.During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/19/2025, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Bed-Holds and Returns when two of four sampled residents (Resident 1, 2) were not provided written notification of bed-hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization) upon admission or at transfer.This failure resulted in Resident 1 to not know their bed-hold rights during transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH) and a potential for Resident 2 to not know their rights.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of malignant neoplasm (mass, cancer) of upper lobe, right bronchus (portion of the airway) or lung, malignant neoplasm of left adrenal gland (hormone-producing organ), and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P/P) titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, 1. to conduct an Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] group of healthcare professionals, including resident/ resident representative, working together to provide residents with needed care) and 2. to document a post fall care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) after sliding out of the wheelchair and onto the floor. This failure resulted in Resident 2, who is non-verbal and bedbound, having another fall on 06/04/2025 of sliding out of the bed and onto the floor and staff returning Resident 2 to bed without informing the charge nurse or supervisor, and without having a qualified staff assess for injuries. This failure also resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a fractured femur (a break in the femur, the long bone in the thigh, and is a serious injury), enduring hours of pain and transferring to the general acute care hospital (GACH). Findings: During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 2), was assessed for pain after a fall incident on 6/5/2025. This failure resulted in the delay of pain assessment and interventions and had the potential for Resident 2 to suffer severe pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right knee osteoarthritis (breakdown of joint cartilage, leading to pain, stiffness, and limited movement in the affected joints), hypertension (high blood pressure), and ataxia (loss of muscle coordination). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 4/15/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with eating, toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 2 '…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) assessment was completed accurately for three of 19 sampled residents (Residents 6, 72, and 10) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 6's risperidone (anti-psychotic medication used to treat several mental health conditions) was encoded as anti-psychotic medication (a type of drug used to treat symptoms of psychosis) under MDS section N (N0415 High Risk Drug Classes - Use and Indication). 2. Ensure Resident 72's significant weight loss (loss of 5 percent ([%] - out of each 100) or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months) was encoded under MDS Section K (K0300 Weight Loss). 3. Ensure Resident 10 had accurate documentation in the MDS to reflect her use of Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate ([anti-coagulant]- medication used to thin the blood). These deficient practices resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY sBased upon interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure smoke break weren't limited for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 55). This deficient practice resulted in violating Resident 55's rights to smoke. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis of the right lower limb (a bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues in the right lower leg), sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), bacteremia (bacteria in the blood) and open wound to the right thigh. During a review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 55 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 55 required substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Obtain a written informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) and conduct an interdisciplinary team (([IDT] - team members from different disciplines who come together to discuss resident care) meeting before initiation of a psychotropic drug (Any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) for resident with diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 35). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 35 to receive unnecessary medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 35 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 35's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the room's curtains and curtain rod was not broken for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 79). This deficient practice resulted in a violation of Resident 79's right to privacy and a potential to result in a safety hazard. Findings: During a review of Resident 79's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral ischemia (insufficient blood flow to the brain), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining), neuropathy (disease or dysfunction of one or more nerves, typically causing numbness or weakness in the hands and feet) and adult failure to thrive (an inability to sustain weight due to poor nutrition, leading to progressive decline). During a review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to prevent a decline in joint range of motion ([ROM] - full movement potential of a joint) for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 24 and 76) who had limited ROM by failing to: 1. Ensure 24 received timely quarterly (every three months) Joint Mobility Screening/Assessment to monitor changes in joint range of motion. 2. Ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 76) received passive range of motion ([PROM]- movement of a joint through its full range of motion without any effort from the individual) exercises seven days a week by the Restorative Nurse Assistant ([RNA]- a healthcare worker who helps residents improve and maintain function in physical abilities) as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices had the potential to cause further decline in Resident 24 and Resident 76's ROM and overall quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (front page of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a peripheral catheter ([IV] - a thin tube inserted into a vein for therapeutic purposes such as administration of medications, fluids and/or blood products) was removed after IV antibiotic (a drug used to treat infections caused by bacteria) was completed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 57). This deficient practice had the potential for the IV insertion site to develop infection and/or hospitalization for Resident 57. Findings: During a review of Resident 57's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 57 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 57's diagnoses included urinary tract infection ([UTI] - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ([DM] - a disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure accurate accounting/documentation of a controlled drug ([Lyrica]- medication used for nerve pain) for one out of seven sampled residents (Resident 21). This deficient practice had the potential to result in drug diversion. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 21's diagnoses included hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), seizure (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness), and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). During a review of Resident 21's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/20/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 21 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a resident assessment tool), dated 6/4/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a pharmacy consultant (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) recommendation to consider ordering valproic acid level (test that measures the concentration of valproic acid, an anticonvulsant medication, in the blood) and ammonia level (test that measures the amount of ammonia level in the blood) was acknowledged and acted upon for one of five sampled residents (Resident 72). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 72 to experience a delay in treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 72 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 72's diagnoses included congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure laboratory test (a medical procedure that analyzes a sample of blood, urine, or other bodily fluid or tissue) to check ammonia level (test that measures the amount of ammonia level in the blood) was completed monthly as ordered by the physician for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 24). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 24 not receiving necessary medical treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 24's diagnoses included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 31) had enhanced barrier precautions ([EBP]- infection control strategy aimed at reducing the transmission of bacteria resistant to antibiotics) was implemented when care was provided to his feeding tube (a flexible plastic tube placed into the stomach to help you get nutrition when you're unable to eat). This deficient practice put Resident 31 at risk for infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 31 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident 31's diagnoses included hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and malnutrition (a condition caused by not getting enough calories or the right amount of key nutrients). During a review of Resident 31's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/19/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 31 had the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement 1 of 3 sampled residents ' , (Resident 1) care plan titled, Resident non-compliant manifested by refusing medications, history of refusing to take medications for 2 months, which indicated to hold an Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] group of healthcare professionals, including resident/ resident representative, working together to provide residents with needed care) to address non-compliant behavior. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s continued refusal of medications not addressed, and had the potential to affect in maintaining the resident ' s highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 2/3/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of schizophrenia (a chronic mental health condition characterized by profound disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors), suicidal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Work Practices, which indicated drinks should not be stored in areas of possible contamination. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination. wellness. Findings: During an observation on 2/3/2025 at 11:15 a.m., the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) was observed reviewing the computer screen on the medication (med) cart and was drinking cranberry juice. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/2025 at 11:35 a.m., LVN 1 was observed again with a cup of cranberry juice and her personal cell phone was ringing on top of the med cart. LVN 1 stated the juice and cell phone belonged to her. LVN 1 stated she knew she should not be drinking cranberry juice and should not place her personal cell phone on top of the med cart because germs may spread, and she could get sick. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Work Practices, dated 4/2023, the P&P indicated food, and drink shall not be stored in areas with possible contamination.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADL- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing, and toileting a person of life-threatening conditions) specific to showering with interventions. These deficient practice had the potential for the resident to not receive care services specific to resident's needs which can result in Resident 1 sustaining another fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), restlessness/agitation (a sense of severe uneasiness, crankiness, or inner tension), lack of coordination ( the inability to control the muscles in your body to coordinate movements), abnormalities of gait/mobility (an unusual walking pattern that can be caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of two of four sampled Resident ' s (Resident 1 and Resident 4) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 ' s ID (identification) card, Medi-Cal card and passport were documented on the resident ' s Inventory List. 2. Ensure Resident 3 ' s Compact Discs (CDs) was not lost or stolen. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 ' s personal belongings to be lost or stolen without accountability and could negatively affect Resident 3 ' s psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included, end stage renal disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure), cardiomegaly (a condition where the heart becomes larger than normal), cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain.) During a review of Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of three residents ' (Resident 1), the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 had an order for oxygen administration. 2. Call the physician for Resident 1, who received oxygen without a physician ' s order and suffered a low oxygen saturation (O2 Sat- [%] measures how much oxygen is in the blood, normal range 95% to 100%) of 79%-81% on 10/2/2024. 3. Provide the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This failure resulted in the resident ' s delay in receiving interventions from the physician which could have prevented resident ' s transfer to the general acute care hospital (GACH). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by chemical imbalance in the blood that affects brain function), sepsis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in incomplete resident records necessary in providing care to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by chemical imbalance in the blood that affects brain function), sepsis (a life-threatening emergency characterized by an extreme response to infection that can result in multi-system organ failure), pneumonitis (inflammation of the walls of the alveoli in the lungs, usually caused by a virus), diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels), anemia (low blood count), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic systolic heart failure (hear failure), bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), kidney failure and adult failure to thrive (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed within reach for three of 19 sampled residents (Resident 43, 65, and 72). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in or inability for the residents to obtain necessary care and services in a timely manner. Findings: a)During observation and interview on 6/4/2024, at 10:36 a.m., Resident 65 was observed in his room, lying in his bed, awake, alert and was able to respond to questions with limited words and gestures. Resident 65 was observed pressing on the television (TV) remote control and continuously shouting for help. Resident 65's call light was observed tied on the nightstand and was not within the resident's reach. A review of Resident 65's of admission Record (facesheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including of cerebral infarction (a lack of adequate blood supply to the brain cells, damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a competency assessment skill (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual need to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) checks were performed yearly for three of five randomly selected staff. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not be able to assess the skills necessary to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident will not be performed within the acceptable standards of practice. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/6/2024 at 9:08 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), five randomly employee files were checked. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 3), and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 5), did not have competency assessment skills done yearly. The DSD stated competency assessment skills check to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A received-by and delivery dates were placed on 3 tubs of frozen ice cream in freezer # 5. 2. Dirty aprons were not placed in the dry storage area of the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an observation, on 6/4/2024 at 8:50 a.m., at Freezer # 5 in the kitchen, Freezer # 5 was observed to have had three ice cream tubs (3 gallons each) with no received-by and delivery date labeled on the items. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/4/2024 at 9:15 a.m., a dirty apron bin was observed sitting in the dry storage area. Dietary [NAME] 1 (DC 1) stated the dirty apron bin was not supposed to be in the dry storage area. DC 1 stated the risk of having a dirty apron bin in the dry storage care could result in contaminating the food. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/5/2024 at 9:05 a.m., with DC 1 at Freezer # 5, DC 1 stated the 3 tubs of ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Implement infection control measures for two of two sampled residents (Residents 15 and 24) by failing to wear Personal Protective Equipment ([PPE] gown - specialized clothing or equipment worn by an employee for protection against infectious materials) prior to entering and administering medication via g-tube to Resident 15 and Resident 24 on Enhanced Standard Precautions ([ESP] a resident-centered and activity-based approach for preventing Multiple Drug Resistant Organism ([MDRO]-are bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics) transmission in skilled nursing facilities). This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another), spread of infections and placed other residents at risk for infection. Findings: A review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 15 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure residents who had physical restraint (any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) were evaluated regularly and less restrictive measures were attempted for one of one sampled resident (Resident 69). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 69 at risk for unnecessary prolonged use of restraint that could lead to decline in physical functioning and not being treated with respect and dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and seizure disorder (sudden change in movement or awareness due to a change in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2), Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] a tool to determine if the person had, or was suspected of having a mental illness, intellectual disability [a term used when a person has certain limitations in cognitive functioning and skills, including communication, social and self-care skills], or related condition) level one (I) screening was re-submitted after a hospital exemption and Resident 2 had stayed in the facility for more than 30 days the appropriate state-designated authority for a PASRR level two (II) evaluation and determination. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 not receiving the necessary and appropriate psychiatric level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Fill out the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR], a tool to determine if the person had, or was suspected of having, a mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition) level one screening and refer one of eight sampled residents (Resident 15) who had a diagnoses of schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behave) to the appropriate state-designated authority for PASRR level two evaluation and determination. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 15 not receiving appropriate treatment recommendations for schizophrenia. Findings: A review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 15's diagnoses included schizophrenia and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning). A review of Resident 15's History…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Implement care plan intervention of placing a bed alarm while in bed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 69) who was identified at risk for fall. This failure had the potential to cause further fall for Resident 69. Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and seizure disorder (sudden change in movement or awareness due to a change in the electrical function of the brain). A review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment and care screening tool) under Section C (Cognitive Patterns), dated 4/6/2024, the MDS indicated, Resident 69's cognitive (ability to reason, understand, remember, judge, and learn) skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS under Section GG (Functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A nasal cannula for oxygen use was dated and properly stored to prevent contamination for one out of 5 residents (Resident 41). This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications associated with oxygen therapy, negatively impacting the health and well-being of the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 41's admission record (face sheet) indicated Resident 41 was initially admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of [DATE]. Resident 41's face sheet indicated diagnoses that included Klebsiella Pneumoniae (a type of bacteria that is resistant to antibiotics), peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive blockage disorder of the blood vessels), dementia (a mental condition resulting in the loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Document one of one sampled resident (Resident 65)'s refusing splints (an external device used to support and immobilize an injury or joint) on the left hand and left knee. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 65's existing contractures (tightening of the muscles and tendons that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff) to worsen. Findings: A review of Resident 65's of admission Record (face sheet), the admission Record indicated, Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infarction (a lack of adequate blood supply to the brain cells, damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss oxygen to the area), contracture of the left hand, major depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with daily living). A review of Resident 65's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/18/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 65 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and person-centered plan of care for one of three sample residents (Resident 1) to address the following Resident's noncompliance related to care and treatment: 1. Refusal to keep the wound dressing on both feet after treatment was performed, and while going outside into the smoking patio with gangrene (dead tissues caused by infection) wounds on his feet. 2. Refusal to refrain from wearing shoes on his feet for prolonged periods with gangrene wounds. This deficient practice had a potential to result in a delay or lack of care and services for Resident 1 which could worsen the resident's condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), dated 8/14/2023, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include gangrene, type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM], abnormal blood sugar), peripheral vascular disease (blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatment was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a diabetic mellitus ([DM], abnormal blood sugar) ulcer (open sore or wound) to the left 1st toe. This deficient practice had to potential to result in the worsening of Resident 1's wound. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), dated 8/14/2023, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include gangrene (dead tissues caused by infection), type 2 DM, peripheral vascular disease (blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels outside of you heart and brain to narrow, often in legs), atherosclerosis (thickening or hardening of the arteries caused by a buildup of plaque in the inner lining of an artery) of extremities (a limb of the body, hand or foot) with gangrene to bilateral (involving two sides) legs. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and consult with the resident ' s physician when a resident had a laboratory result that fall outside of clinical reference ranges for one of one sample resident (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the necessary care and services and placed Resident 1 at increased risk for medical complications, hospitalizations, and death. Findings: a. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record (Face Sheet), dated 7/27/2023 the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), psychotic disturbance (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person ' s mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on the status of three of 23 sampled residents (Resident 32, 43, and 63), Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II and integrate the level of care into a plan of care. The deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 32, 43 and 63 not receiving the appropriate care and management for their mental illness. Findings: During a review of the admission record for Resident 32, the admission record indicated Resident 32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of schizophrenia disorder (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions) and psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which thought, and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality). During a review of the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), (What date?) the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on a comprehensive assessment, that Resident 68 did not receive Lamictal (a mood stabilizer medication that works in the brain) and Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental illness), a psychotropics (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) unless it was necessary to treat a specific condition. The facility also failed to perform a gradual dose reduction and implement behavioral interventions, to discontinue the psychotropic drug. As a result, Resident 68 was placed at unnecessary risk of unwanted and irreversible side effects and adverse drug reactions. Findings: During a review of Resident 68's face sheet (admission record, a document containing medical and demographic information), the face sheet indicated Resident 68 was self-responsible, and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 68's initial admitting diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater as evidenced by six medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error to yield a medication error rate of 24 %, for three of five residents (Residents 14, Resident 15, and Resident 80) observed during medication administration (med pass). a. The facility failed to administer Resident 14's prescribed over the counter (OTC) house supply medication docusate sodium (used to treat constipation) and MiraLAX (used to treat occasional constipation) as ordered by the physician. b. The facility failed to ensure Resident 15 was administered a diabetic (a disease that results in too much sugar in the blood) medication, metformin (a medication that helps control blood sugar levels) with food and administered the correct prescribed dosage of Docusate Sodium as ordered by the physician. c. The facility failed to ensure Resident 80 was administered a diabetic medication, glimepiride (a medication that helps control blood sugar levels) with food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on renal diet (type of diet prescribed for patients with kidney disease) with and soft, bite size texture were served the diet according to the menu and spreadsheet instructions (food portioning and serving guide). This deficient practice had the potential to result in increase in potassium (a chemical that is critical to the function of nerve and muscle cells, including those in your heart) levels, meal dissatisfaction and decreased food intake in 3 of 6 residents who were on renal diet. Findings: During a review of the facility's lunch menu on 3/7/22,the meal menu indicated the following items would be served for regular diet: Chicken parmesan, scalloped potatoes, garlic spinach, wheat roll, pudding, and milk. During a review of the facility's lunch menu on 3/7/22, indicated the following items would be served on renal diet: Baked chicken with gravy, brown rice, broccoli, wheat roll, apples, and beverage. During a concurrent observation, and interview, of the meal plating on 3/7/22, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage in the kitchen when: 1.Four pieces sliced ready to eat ham were stored in the reach in refrigerator with date of 2/28/22 and a medium size plastic container of sliced ham was stored in reach in refrigerator with date of 3/2/22 exceeding storage period of ready to eat lunch meat. Fully cooked half of a ham was thawing in the reach in refrigerator with no thaw date. 2.A large bag of expired frozen cookie dough was stored in the facility reach in freezer. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in 77 out of 83 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1.During an observation in the kitchen on 3/7/22, at 8:45AM, a plate with four slices of ham were stored in the reach in refrigerator with a date of 2/28/22. In the same reach in refrigerator there was a medium plastic container with three open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent and control the spread of infection in accordance with its infection prevention and control program for three of 83 sampled residents (Residents 22, 81, 10, and 70) by failing to ensure: 1. Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 2 performed hand hygiene before, after and between providing care for Resident 22 and 81. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3 performed hand hygiene before, after and between providing care for Resident 10 and 70. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to the spread of infection among residents and staff in the facility. Findings: 1. During a review of the admission record for Resident 22, the admission record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of conversion disorder (a mental condition in which a person has blindness, paralysis, or other nervous system symptoms that cannot be explained by a medical evaluation) with seizures or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of one sample resident (Resident 36's) privacy and dignity by failing to provide a privacy bag (a pouch that conceals a urinary drainage bag [bag that collects urine] from public view). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 36's self-esteem and self-worth. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (facesheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 36' s diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type 2 (abnormal blood sugar), chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs) and blindness (unable to see). During a review of Resident 36's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/17/2021, the H&P indicated Resident 36 could make his needs known but could not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to involve the Responsible party ([RP] person who makes medical decisions for a resident, who is not able to make decisions for themselves) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 39), in the care planning process. This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 39 RP's right to be an active participant in Resident 39's care. During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (facesheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 39' s diagnoses included Tourette's Syndrome (disorder that involves repetitive movements or unwanted sounds [tics] that can't be easily controlled), depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and kidney failure (disease where kidneys [organ in the body]no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 39's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/31/2021, the H&P indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate self-determination for one resident out of 23 sampled residents (Resident 46), by not allowing resident 46 to exercise her choice of when to take a shower. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a negative impact on the psychosocial well-being of Resident 46. Findings: During a review of the admission record (face-sheet) for Resident 46, the facesheet indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis (The process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body. Dialysis is necessary when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood), and chronic kidney disease stage 4 (stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) has advanced kidney damage with a severe decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to 15-30 ml/min. person with stage 4 CKD will need dialysis or a kidney transplant in the near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan addressing the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a persistent sad mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) for three of 23 sampled residents (Residents 57, 47, and 68). This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to receive individualized care and treatment to meet their psychosocial needs. Findings: 1. During a review Resident 57's, admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 57 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 57 had diagnosis including major depressive disorder and insomnia (inability to sleep). During a review of the History and Physical report (H/P), dated 10/17/2021, the H/P indicated Resident 57 was able to make decisions for activities of daily living. During a review of the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and resident-centered care plans, for three of 23 sample residents (Resident 5,36, 83) by failing to: 1) Implement Resident 5's care plan causing a three-month delay in physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT). 2) Implement Resident 36's care interventions to monitor for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI-infection affecting the organs [kidneys, bladder, urethra] of the urinary system) for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the body to empty urine from the bladder into a bag outside the body). 3) Develop a fall care plan for Resident 83, who was at high risk for falls. These deficient practices have the potential to negatively the health and the delivery of care and services to Residents 5, 36, 83. A. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (facesheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and maintain an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the body to empty urine from the bladder into a bag outside the body) for one of one sample residents (Resident 36). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 36's plan of care and increase the risk of a urinary tract infection ([UTI] an infection affecting the urinary system including). During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (facesheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 36' s diagnoses included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ([BPH] a disease that can affect the flow of urine out of the bladder causing bladder, urinary tract or kidney problems), chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs) and blindness (unable to see). During a review of Resident 36's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/17/2021, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 23 residents (Resident 21 and 47) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 21 had ordered labs drawn for a Hemoglobin A1c ([HgA1c] diagnostic blood test that measures the average blood sugar levels over the past three months) and Digoxin level. (Medication that treats heart failure and heart rhythm problems). 2. Resident 47 was provided proper repositioning care. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to an increased risk of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), risk of infection, delayed wound healing, hospitalizations, diabetic coma, and death for Resident 21 and had the potential to negatively affect Residents 47's physical comfort, skin integrity, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: 1. During a record review of the admission record for Resident 21, the admission record indicated Resident 21 was originally admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of nine sampled residents (Resident 5), with limited range of motion (ROM - the extent of movement of a joint) received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain ROM by failing to: 1. Implement Resident 5's care plan to provide Rehab as ordered by the physician causing a three-month delay in physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT). 2. Ensure PT and OT services were provided as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for further ROM decline and contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). During a review of Resident 5's admission record (facesheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 5' s diagnoses included left sided hemiplegia (unable to move one side of body), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 68). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 68 from attaining or maintaining her highest practicable level of well- being. Findings: During a review of the admission record (face sheet) for Resident 68, the facesheet indicated resident 68 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of aphakia (a condition in which a person is missing the lens of one or both eyes, and blepharochalasis (a rare syndrome consisting of recurrent bouts of upper eyelid edema associated with thinning, stretching, and fine wrinkling of the involved skin). During a review of the Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool) for resident 68 dated 2/6/2022, indicated Resident 68's cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse did not crush seven (7) medications together and administer them to one of five sampled residents (Resident 14) observed. (Cross Reference F759) This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm to the resident due to receiving a medication combination not ordered by the physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's face sheet (admission record, a document containing medical and demographic information), the face sheet indicated Resident 14 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 14's diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (progressive loss of memory), gastroesophageal reflux disease ([GERD] occurs when stomach acid frequently flows back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach) During a review of Resident 14's history and physical (H&P) dated 8/18/2021, indicated, Resident 14 did not have the capacity to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to: 1. Store medication at the correct temperature as required by the manufacturer's specifications for one of two medication carts (Station 2 Medication Cart 2) observed. 2. Ensure expired and discontinued medications was destroyed in accordance with the facility's policy titled, Medication Destruction. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being by improperly storing medications that required refrigeration and failure to destroy expired and discontinued medications remaining in the facility for over 90 days. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/8/2022, at 7:13 a.m., of Station 2 Medication Cart 2, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, inside the of Medication Cart 2 was one Insulin Glargine ([insulin glargine-yfgn] is a long-acting insulin that helps control high blood sugar levels) Injection Pen (an insulin auto-injecting pen device) which was not labeled with an open date found stored at room temperature. LVN 1 confirmed the Insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-06-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure 1 of 2 trash dumpster lids were closed. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unwanted pests and vermin. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/3/2025, at 9:25 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), one trash dumpster lid was observed filled with trash and the lid was open. The DS stated all dumpsters were to remain closed. The DS stated the risk of having an open trash dumpster lid could result in a potential infestation for pests and vermin. During a review of the facility's undated policy and procedures (P&P), titled Waste Control and Disposal, the P&P indicated Trash bins should be covered at all times.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,146 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,146 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JRB INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/26/2000 |
| AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| KLAVAN, RACHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 20% | since 06/30/2023 |
| WUDNEH, ALEM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/01/2017 |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/30/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555071. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.