No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mayflower Care Center

5043 Peck Rd, El Monte, CA 91732 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (626) 579-1602 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 579-1602 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 40 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
117 E Live Oak Ave 101 · (626) 446-8492 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs1.1 mi
11574 Lower Azusa Rd · (626) 350-3550 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
298 E Live Oak Ave · (626) 446-1902 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3371 Peck Rd · (626) 334-1065 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4064 E Live Oak Ave · (626) 447-2126

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased36.5%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.9%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.5%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.8%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.0%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.9%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.7%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.202.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.341.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.2–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge80.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.3–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.22
RN hours/ resident / day
1.26
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 57.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan (CP - summary of a person's health condition, care needs, treatments, goals of treatment, and specific interventions for each identified condition or care need) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 did not have a care plan for Resident 1's diagnosis of multiple myeloma (a type of blood cancer). 2. Resident 1 did not have a care plan for Resident 1's diagnosis of osteopenia (bones are weaker than normal). These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to receive inappropriate care and services. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, document that contains a patient's personal and contact information, diagnoses, and medical history), the FS indicated Resident 1 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff assisted with cleaning eye discharge around both eyes and underneath the eyes on the resident's face for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact Resident 2's dignity and result in the resident not being treated with respect, kindness, and dignity.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (the blood supply to the brain is blocked or reduced), heart failure (the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should), muscle weakness, and dry eye syndrome (eyes do not have enough tears or do not make the right type of tears or tears evaporate too fast). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 developed and implemented a person-centered care plan (a treatment plan that focused on the needs and preferences of a resident or individual) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) after Resident 2 was observed with skin discoloration on the left upper extremities, the left side of the body, and the right forearm on 12/1/2025. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to receive inadequate and inappropriate care.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness in the arm, leg, and face on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke, damage to brain tissue caused by loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of two sampled residents (Residents 24 and 1). These failures had the potential to result in Residents 24 and 1 to not receive necessary care or receive delayed services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and osteoarthritis (OA, a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 5/4/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 24 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information). The MDS indicated Resident 24 was dependent (helper did all the effort, resident did none of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY c. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and osteoarthritis (OA, a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 5/4/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 24 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information). The MDS indicated Resident 24 was dependent (helper did all the effort, resident did none of the effort to complete the activity) with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower, upper and lower body dressing and personal hygiene. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/24/2025 at 1:08 p.m. with Medical Records (MR), Resident 24's chart, EMR and AD Acknowledgement form, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures for oxygen administration were implemented for two of two sampled residents (Resident 49 and Resident 46) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 49's nasal cannula tubing was not touching the floor when in use. b. Ensure Resident 46's nasal cannula tubing was labeled and was receiving oxygen according to physician's order. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of Resident 49's and Resident 46's care equipment, placing the residents at risk for infection and could have caused complications associated with oxygen therapy for Resident 46. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR), the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and heart failure. During a review of Resident 49's History & Physical (H&P), dated 10/2/2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Physical Restraint, for four of four sampled residents (Residents 29, 57, 7 and 49) by failing to: a. Ensure to obtain an informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) before the installation of side rails. b. Ensure appropriate alternative interventions to side rails/bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars attached to the bed) were attempted and did not meet the needs of Resident 57 and ensure the side rails/bed rails pads for Resident 57 were free from damage and wear and tear. c. Ensure Resident 7 had padded bedside rails for seizures as ordered by the physician. d. Ensure Resident 49 had padded bedside rails for seizures as ordered by the physician These failures placed Residents 29, 57, 7, and 49 at risk for entrapment (an event in which residents were caught,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage and sanitation standards by failing to: a. Ensure there were no expired items stored in the refrigerator: one bag of tortillas, four cheese sandwiches, and seven peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. b. Ensure one tray of apple sauce (20 individual serving containers), and one tray of fruit cocktail (26 individual serving containers) were stored with a preparation date label. c. Ensure monitoring and documenting logs for the Dish machine temperature log, Quat Sanitizer log, and the Refrigerator & Freezer temperature logs for June 2025 were completed. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages). Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview of the initial kitchen tour on 6/24/2025 at 8:47 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) while in the walk-in refrigerator, one bag of tortillas in a clear storage bag had a past best buy date of 6/18/2025, four cheese sandwiches had a past best buy date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for one of one sampled resident (Resident 10) when staff did not close the privacy curtain while changing Resident 10's clothes. This deficient practice violated Resident 10's right to bodily privacy and resulted in unnecessary exposure of Resident 10's upper chest area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 10's psychosocial (mental and emotional) well-being, self-esteem, and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/4/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 10 had severely impaired cognition (mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 46), Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment related to respiratory treatments - oxygen therapy was accurately documented to reflect the resident's use of oxygen. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 46's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR), the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 46's History & Physical (H&P), dated 2/25/2024, the H&P indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/16/2025, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a communication device in a language that the resident understood for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 30's communication with the staff and had the potential to result in a delay in the provision of care, treatment, and services to the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) and anxiety (characterized by excessive, persistent worry and fear that can interfere with daily life). During a review of Resident 30's Care Plan (CP), dated 3/22/2023, the CP indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident who used a plate guard (a dining aid that can help people with limited control, grip, or dexterity eat with one hand and reduce the risk of spills) during meals for one of one sampled resident (Resident 39). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 39's decline in nutritional status and inability to maintain independence during mealtimes. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength), osteoarthritis (OA, a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 39's Care Plan (CP), dated 8/19/2022, the CP indicated Resident 39 had an alteration in nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Assistants 1 and 2 (CNA 1 and CNA 2) donned (put on) the required personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) while providing care to one of one sampled resident (Resident 10) who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, an approach for the use of PPE to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] between residents in skilled nursing facilities). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for the residents and the staff that could result in a widespread infection in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the wheelchair pad alarm was functional to alert the staff for one of one sampled resident (Resident 51) as indicated in the facility's policy titled Alarm Monitor and plan of care. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 51 not receiving care or receiving delayed services to meet the residents' needs and had the potential to result in a fall or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 51 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and Alzheimer's disease (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). During a review of Resident 51's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 of 28 residents (12 residents) in the dining room were encouraged to engage in activities of their choice and/or encouraged to participate in the activity program. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation in the dining room on 12/18/24 at 11:03 am, the Activity Director (AD) was exercising with the residents. The AD was standing in the middle of the dining room and was facing the table located next to the right wall of the dining room. There were 15 residents who faced the AD while doing exercises. The 12 residents sitting behind the AD were just sitting and looking around, and some residents were sleeping in their wheelchair. No one encouraged the 12 residents behind the AD to participate in the exercise program and/or encouraged them to engage in any activity of their choice. One resident was getting a haircut in the right corner of the dining room next to the entrance to the dining room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Policy & Procedure: Accident/Incident Prevention, and Policy: Call Lights, by failing to: 1. Ensure call light was within reach for two of 11 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) in the resident's room. 2. Ensure call light pull cords were within reach for 10 of 11 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) when using the bathroom. 3. Ensure call lights were functioning for three of 11 sampled residents (Residents 2, 6, and 7) when using the bathroom. These deficient practices increased the potential for an accident and/or a delay in care due to the inability to call for help because the call lights did not flash above the room door and/or the pull cords were too short to reach from the toilet. Cross Reference F919 Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning and accessible call light system as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled, Policy: Call Lights, by failing to: 1. Ensure call light was within reach for two of 11 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) in the resident's room. 2. Ensure call light pull cords were within reach for ten of 11 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) when using the bathroom. 3. Ensure call lights were functioning for three of 11 sampled residents (Residents 2, 6, and 7) when using the bathroom. These deficient practices had the potential to delay the provision of care for Residents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 and negatively affect the residents' well-being when the residents were unable to call staff for assistance. Cross Reference F689 Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 1 to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its policy on Advance Directive (AD, a written preferences regarding treatment options, a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents to understand and plan for future healthcare decisions when individuals were no longer able to make their own healthcare decisions) for five of five sampled residents (Residents 14, 26, 36, 44, 48). These failures had the potential for the facility staff to provide medical care and services against the resident's will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia (decrease in the total amount of red blood cells in the blood) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan (CP) to meet the residents' specific needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 10 and 48 ) by failing to: a. Develop an individualized and person- centered care plan for Resident 48 who had a diagnosis of psychosis (severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality) and major depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness and worthlessness and a lack of desire to engage in formerly pleasurable activities). b. Develop an individualized and person- centered care plan for Resident 10 who was on oxygen therapy (supplemental oxygen, a treatment that provides people with breathing problems. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 10 and 48 to not receive necessary care and/or services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plans (CP) were revised according to the resident's needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 10 and 36). These failures had the potential risks for Resident's 10 and 36 not to receive interventions specific to the residents' needs. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 36 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think and make decisions) and seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain that may cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and levels of consciousness). During a review of Resident 36's CP revised on 2/14/2024, the CP indicated Resident 36 was at risk for falls and had history of falls. The CP interventions included for staff to place a pad alarm in bed (device that contain sensors that trigger an alarm to detect a change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided with communication device with the language that the resident understood in accordance to facility's policy titled Accommodation of Needs Related to Communication and the residents plan of care for two of two sampled residents (Residents 19 and 52). These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 19 and 52 to not be able to express their needs and receive necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (elevated levels of glucose/sugar in the blood and urine), dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 19's untitled care plan initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a resident's refusal to follow the physician's order for fasting blood sugar (FBS, measures blood glucose after fasting) test on 6/5/24, 6/14/24, 6/17/24, 6/18/24, 6/19/24, 6/21/24, 6/22/24, 6/24/24, 6/25/24, 6/26/24, 6/27/24, 6/28/24 and 6/30/24 for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive necessary treatment and services that would result to adverse consequences for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus ( elevated blood sugar level) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 12/13/2023, the OSR indicated Resident 1 had an order for FBS daily before breakfast and to notify the physician if the blood sugar level was above 300 milligrams (mg)/ deciliter (dl)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to : a. Ensure one of one walk-in freezer used for food storage was kept clean and sanitary. b. Ensure one fly and two gnats were not found in the kitchen area. These deficient practices had the potential for cross contamination that could lead to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages). Findings: a. During an observation on 7/2/24 at 9:30 am, the walk-in freezer had a mat on the floor. The mat had round holes and the holes were filled with brown, black and dry substance. During an interview on 7/2/24 at 9:31 am, the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) stated staff needed to clean the walk-in freezer once a week on weekends. The DSS stated the area under the mat needed to be cleaned. b. During an observation on 7/2/24 at 9:32 am, the dry storage area was located inside the kitchen with the door open. There was one fly inside the storage area. During an observation on 7/2/24 at 9:45 am, there was an open closet space located inside the kitchen where the mops and mop buckets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's call light was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 38). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 38 not to receive or received delayed care to meet the resident's needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia ( long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and Alzheimer's disease (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 5/26/2024, the MDS indicated, Resident 38 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand) and required moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification to the Long-term care Ombudsman (agency who advocates for residents) of a facility-initiated discharge for one of one sampled resident (Resident 29). This failure had the potential risk to result in inappropriate discharge of Resident 29 without the protection from the Ombudsman. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure (heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and dysphagia (difficult swallowing). During a review of Resident 29's Change of Condition (COC) Form dated 4/22/2024 timed at 9 pm, the COC form indicated Resident 29 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) due to chest pain on 4/22/2024 During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 6/20/2024, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan (CP) intervention to provide night light was implemented for one of two sampled residents (Resident 36) who had a history of falls. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 36 to experience repeated falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 36 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think and make decisions) and seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain that may cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and levels of consciousness). During a review of Resident 36's Change of Condition (COC) form completed on 2/13/2024, the COC form indicated Resident 36 had a fall on 2/12/2024 around 10:10 pm, in Resident 36's room, resulting to a bump in Resident 36's forehead, skin tear on left forearm and discoloration on the right knee. Resident 36 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental oxygen) in accordance with the physician's order for one of one sampled resident (Resident 10). This deficient practice placed Resident 10 at risk for shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) which could lead to serious complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure (condition in which the heart doesn't pump enough blood) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 4/5/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 10 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand) and totally dependent (helper did all of the effort, resident did none of the effort to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper waste disposal in one of two trash (garbage) bins. This deficient practice had the potential to harbor pests and placed the facility at risk for diseases and infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/2/2024 at 9:47 am, there were two trash bins in the facility. Trash Bin 1 was left open because trash from the inside was filled up the brim. Trash Bin 2 had enough space for trash. In an interview, the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) stated the facility staff needed to ensure not to overfill trash bins so that the trash bin lid would be closed. The DSS stated when the trash bin was open, it would attract pests, insects, flies, and rodents (rats). During an interview on 7/3/2024 at 4:34 pm, the facility Administrator stated the facility would need to use a third trash bin to prevent overfilling of garbage and ensure proper waste disposal. The Administrator stated an open trash bin would attract pests. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedures (P&P) titled Hand Washing and Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO, bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antibiotics] ) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 44) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not wear gloves before touching Resident 44's indwelling Foley catheter (FC - thin, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag outside the body) and did not perform hand hygiene before touching Resident 44's Gastrostomy Tube (GT, surgical insertion of a tube, creating an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support) feeding. These failures had the potential for infection for Resident 44 and other residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 44 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0917 — pattern
    Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (PP) titled, Homelike Environment, for 19 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22) by failing to: Ensure Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 were provided bedside tables (adjustable table on wheel that can fit over a resident's bed used for eating, personal items and a table for treatment by nursing staff) to use according to each resident's needs. This deficient practice could result in a decline in Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22's well-being due to failure to promote a homelike environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 to the facility initially on 1/20/2021, and readmitted Resident 2 on 12/28/2023, with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to think, remember or make decisions that interfered with doing everyday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1's bedside tray was within reach and not broken for Resident 1 to use. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 1's psychosocial well-being due to possible loss of homelike environment and maintaining independence to the extent possible. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 1 to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted Resident 1 on 1/2/2024, with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness (weakness of muscles caused by lack of exercise, ageing, injury, or disease), glaucoma (group of eye diseases that could affect vision and cause blindness by damaging the optic nerve), and unqualified visual loss, both eyes (decrease in vision and/or visual field that spanned from mild blurriness to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's notice of transfer was sent to the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (public advocate) for three of 15 sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 37, and Resident 46) by: 1. Failing to send a copy of the transfer/discharge to the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman before or as close as possible to the actual time of a facility-initiated transfer or discharge. 2. Failing to ensure the medical record contained evidence that the notice of transfer was sent to the Ombudsman. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 5, 37, and 46 to be at risk of an inappropriate transfer due to lack of Ombudsman representation. Findings: a. A review of Resident 5's admission Record (face sheet) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bronchitis (inflammation of the airways that carry air to the lungs) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide padded side rails as ordered for two of four sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 20). These deficient practices had the potential to result in accidents and injury to the residents. Findings: a. A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 12 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (alteration in consciousness caused by brain dysfunction) and epileptic seizure (tremors, shaking movements, twitching or jerking movements for body parts or whole body that cannot be controlled). A review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/19/2021, indicated the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others and sometimes made self understood. The MDS indicated Resident 12 required extensive assistance (resident involved in activity, staff provide weight-bearing support) with one person physical assist for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-16 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, a. Staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors b. Staffing information was accurate and current, and c. Staffing information was complete and did not have missing information for 12/11/2021, 12/13/2021, 12/14/2021, and 12/15/2021 as required. This deficient practice had the potential to result in misinformation to the residents and the public of the facility's nursing staffing data. Findings: During an observation of the facility with Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 12/16/2021 at 10:34 a.m. , the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) staffing information was posted in Nursing Station 1. In a concurrent interview, DSD stated DHPPD should be posted in front, by the lobby and easily accessible to residents, family, and visitors. DSD stated the staffing information was only posted inside Nurse Station 1. A review of the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) with DSD on 12/16/2021 at 11:49 a.m., she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods thawed (process of warming food that has been frozen) were labeled and dated in the walk-in refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food contamination and/or foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During an observation of the the kitchen on 12/13/2021 at 10:13 a.m. in the presence of the Dietary Supervisor (DS), four packaged bags of chicken legs (about 15 pounds total) in a tray and one packaged bag of pork leg (5 pounds) in a tray were thawed in the bottom shelf of the walk-in refrigerator without a label and without a date. During an interview with DS on 12/13/2021 at 10:15 a.m., she stated the cook should have labeled and dated the food at the start of the thawing process. A review of the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Thawing Food, revised 2019, indicated all food will be thawed in a safe and sanitary manner, in a refrigerator at 40 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or colder. Allow 2 to 3 days to defrost,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect while assisting with meals for two of 15 sampled residents ( Resident 19 and Resident 52). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the residents' well being. Findings: a. A review of the admission Record (face sheet) indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia (decrease in the total amount of red blood cells in the blood) and Alzheimer's Disease (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment and care screening tool dated 9/21/2021, indicated the resident's cognitive (ability to understand) skills for daily decision making was severely impaired and the resident required extensive assistance to total dependence with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for fall was revised after the resident fell and hit the back of his head on 11/4/2021, for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 57). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for future falls. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 57 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility (ability to move) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). A review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/1/2021 indicated the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others and sometimes made self understood. The MDS indicated, Resident 57 required extensive assistance (resident involved in activity, staff provide weight-bearing support) with one person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI-infection that affects part of the urinary tract) prophylaxis (prevention) for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 12). This deficient practice resulted for Resident 12 not to receive meal as ordered by the physician and placed the resident at risk for infection. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 12 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (alteration in consciousness caused by brain dysfunction) and epileptic seizure (tremors, shaking movements, twitching or jerking movements for body parts or whole body that cannot be controlled). A review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/19/2021, indicated the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others and sometimes made self understood. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated and was not on the floor for one of two sampled residents (Resident 50). This deficient practice had the potential to contaminate the oxygen tubing placing the resident at risk for infection. Findings: A review of Resident 50's admission Record (face sheet) indicated the resident was admitted to facility on 8/1/2021 and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (disease that affects the function or structure of the brain) and G-tube (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for medication / nutritional support). A review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 11/4/2021 indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition ( ability to understand). The MDS indicated the resident required total dependence from staff for her activities of daily living with one person assist for bed mobility and transfer. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow their policy and procedure to sign or initial the maintenance log at the time it was checked. The facility staff signed/initialed the laundry water temperature log and lint cleaning schedule log for future days. This deficient practice had the potential for the laundry washer and dryer not maintained in a timely manner causing potential spread of infection and a potential fire hazard. Findings: During a tour of the laundry area on 12/15/2021 at 3:52 pm, the facility's laundry washer water temperature log and lint cleaning schedule-daily log was posted on a board in the facility's laundry room. A review of the facility's maintenance log titled Facility Washer Water Temperature Log/Temperature must be 160 (F)(Fahrenheit) or Above, dated December 2021 indicated on 12/16/2021 at 11 am, washer #2's temperature was documented at 160 and on 12/16/2021 at 4 am, 11 am and 6 pm, washer #3's temperature was documented at 160. A review of the facility's maintenance log titled Lint Cleaning Schedule-Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 5California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 5Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 5Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 5Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 5Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 5Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Highland Springs Care CenterBeaumont, CA 2 of 5Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Santa Fe LodgeEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 3 of 5Green Acres Healthcare CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 5 of 5Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Pico Rivera Healthcare CenterPico Rivera, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 06/16/2026
KLAVAN, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN, LIBBYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, IRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2015
BANOG, MARY FAITHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/2025
ESTANDARTE, NOELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2023
KLAVAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/1986
ZHANG, YANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2016
NOTIS, SHMUELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
FLT ACQUISITIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
PERVAIZ, ZAIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$327K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 14%Other / private 4%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $327K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$357per resident / day
operating cost
$10,847per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$321per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555374. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next