No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pico Rivera Healthcare Center

9140 Verner Street, Pico Rivera, CA 90660 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (562) 948-1961 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 948-1961 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Apr 20261 actual-harm citation$26,588 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,588 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-11)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5060 Rosemead Blvd · (562) 942-9895 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9205 Whittier Blvd · (562) 566-3160 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Rocket0.2 mi
9405 Whittier Blvd · (562) 908-9399 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4865 Durfee Ave · (562) 695-0029 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5044 Durfee Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.3%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.1%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.7%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.142.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.401.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.1%CMS range 23.2–45.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.1–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.7–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
47.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-01-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 95) by failing to: a. Notify the physician of a change of condition (COC) when Resident 95's blood sugar level (measure of glucose [sugar] in the blood [normal range 70- 100 milligrams [mg, unit of measurement] per (/) deciliter [dl, unit of measurement] mg/dl) was elevated on 11/8/2023. b. Notify the physician when Resident 95 began to experience congestion (an abnormal or excessive accumulation of a body fluid), gurgling (a hollow bubbling sound), wheezing, and an episode of emesis (vomiting) on 11/9/2023. These failures resulted in Resident 95 experiencing elevated blood sugar levels over a 24-hour period from 11/8/2023 to 11/9/2023, and respiratory distress and emesis on 11/9/2023. 911 (a phone number used to contact emergency services) was called one and a half hours after the resident had a COC and the paramedics pronounced the resident deceased in the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety practices and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices when the facility failed to:1. Maintain cold food items at safe temperatures when broccoli salads measured 66 to 68 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, a scale of temperature).2. Ensure bowls of yogurt were properly immersed in an ice bath or stored to maintain acceptable temperatures of 40 F and below during tray line or pre-handling service.3. Ensure one box of beans and one box of lentils were adequately sealed and stored in the dry food storage area.4. Ensure one can of diced red peppers were labeled with the date received.5. Ensure food items for Resident 59 and Resident 16 were labeled with sufficient information to determine safe storage duration in the facility's resident refrigerator.These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacterial growth that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or chemicals) for 97 medically compromised residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%) during medication pass for two of three sampled residents (Residents 4 and 49) by failing to:1. Ensure the manufacturer label on the bottle of aspirin (a medication used to prevent heart attack [flow of blood and oxygen is blocked] and stroke [loss of blood flow to a part of the brain]) that was used to administer one tablet of aspirin from, to Resident 4 on [DATE] indicated a valid expiration date in accordance with professional standards of practice.2a. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8 checked Resident 49's respiratory rate ([RR] - the rate at which breathing occurs) as per physician's order before administering gabapentin (a medication used to treat nerve pain and seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness]) to Resident 49 on [DATE].2b. Clarify Resident 49's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ask one of two sampled residents' (Resident 86) preference of wearing a bib during meals.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 86's freedom of choice to wearing a bib being violated, as the resident thought it was the facility's protocol to wear a bib during meals.Findings: During a review of Resident 86's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 86 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 86's diagnoses included asthma (long-term lung disease that inflames and narrows the airways) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 86's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/13/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 86's cognition (process of thinking) was moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 86 required set up and clean-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene.During a review of Resident 86's History and Physical (H&P), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents' (Resident 41) Psychiatric Progress Notes were not filed in another residents medical record.This deficient practice resulted in a violation of Resident 41's confidentiality of medical records. Findings:a. During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 41 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 41's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/4/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 41's cognition (process of thinking) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 41 required substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, upper/lower body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 70's) Depakote ([generic name - divalproex sodium] a medication used to treat seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness] and to manage mood disorder symptoms) was prescribed and administered in accordance with the documented prescriber's evaluation, diagnosis and clinical indication for Resident 70. This deficient practice had the potential to place one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 70) at risk for significant adverse consequences (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of Depakote to treat a mental health disorder for an extended period, which could result in impairment or decline in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional and psychosocial status.(Cross-reference with F641)Findings: During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) assessment for one of five sampled residents (Resident 70) by inaccurately documenting and coding the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) in the MDS without receiving the diagnosis from a physician. This deficient practice had the potential for inaccurate and/or unnecessary care and treatments for bipolar disorder for Resident 70.(Cross-reference with F605)Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 70 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 70's diagnoses included unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, with no other behavioral disturbance, unspecified dementia, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federally mandated screening process designed to ensure individuals with serious mental illnesses or intellectual/development disabilities receive the necessary support) Level 1 Screening for one of three sampled residents (Resident 47) after a significant change in Resident 47's mental condition.This deficient practice resulted in the failure of a more in-depth Level 2 Mental Health Evaluation not being conducted and had the potential for Resident 47 to not receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric level treatment and evaluation in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 47's diagnoses included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT], a coordinated group of experts from several different fields) meeting for one of two sampled residents (Resident 70) after Resident 70 had an unwitnessed fall on 3/31/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate interventions implemented which could result in Resident 70 sustaining another fall.Findings:During a review of Resident 70's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 70 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 70's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and legal blindness (severely vision loss).During a review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/13/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 70's vision was severely impaired (no vision or sees only light, colors or shapes; eyes do not appear to follow objects). The MDS indicated Resident 70's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents' (Resident 8) gastrostomy tube (g-tube- a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) feeding (specialized liquid nutrition through the g-tube) bottle was labeled with Resident 8's name and the date and time the bottle was opened. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 8 to receive the incorrect g-tube feeding and placed Resident 8 at risk of infection.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 8's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), protein-calorie malnutrition (when an individual does not eat enough protein and calories to meet nutritional needs), and adult failure to thrive (gradual functional,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate respiratory monitoring, documentation, and assessments were completed, and ensure a No Smoking/Oxygen in Use sign was displayed on the outside of the entrance of a resident room where an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides oxygen-enriched air to help people breathe) was in use for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 98 and Resident 1).a. Complete a change of condition assessment after Resident 98 developed wheezing (a high-pitched sound made when breathing is restricted/obstructed in the lungs) and required a breathing treatment and oxygen administration.b. Document Resident 98's oxygen administration after the resident's new onset of wheezing.c. Document Resident 98's vital signs (clinical measurements of the body's most basic functions used by healthcare professionals to assess physical health) during the 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift on 2/14/2026 and 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift on 2/15/2026.d. Document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fluid restrictions were followed for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 67), who was receiving hemodialysis (dialysis, a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 67 at risk for fluid retention and overload.Findings: During a review of Resident 67's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 67's diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD- irreversible kidney failure), congestive heart failure (CHF- a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 67's History and Physical (H&P)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two inspected medication carts (West Station Medication Cart) maintained accurate documentation of a resident's (Resident 109's) tramadol (a controlled medication [medications that the use and possession of are controlled by the federal government] used to treat moderate to severe pain) on the accountability record or controlled medication count sheet/controlled drug record ([CDR] - a document indicating perpetual inventory and administration of controlled substances) after tramadol was administered, as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Controlled Substances, dated 3/2023.This deficient practice failed to maintain accurate documentation of an administered controlled medication for Resident 109 and had the potential risk for medication errors, medication misuse, and diversion.Findings: During a review of Resident 109's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 109 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the manufacturer label on a bottle of aspirin (a medication used to prevent heart attack [flow of blood and oxygen is blocked] and stroke [loss of blood flow to a part of the brain]) that was used to administer one tablet of aspirin from, to Resident 4 on [DATE] indicated a valid expiration date, affecting one of three residents (Resident 4) observed during medication administration task.2. Ensure medications and vaccines in one of two medication rooms' refrigerator (East Station Medication Room Refrigerator) requiring refrigeration were stored in accordance with manufacturer specifications and per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Storage in the Facility - Storage of Medications, dated 01/2025, at temperature range of 36-degree Fahrenheit [( F) is a unit of temperature] to 46 F or 2 Celsius [( C) is a unit of temperature] to 8 C.3. Ensure Resident 48's expired Lantus Solostar ([generic name - insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer one of two sampled residents (Resident 86) meal substitutions.This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 86 being hungry which could lead to weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 86's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 86 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 86's diagnoses included asthma (long-term lung disease that inflames and narrows the airways) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 86's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/13/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 86's cognition (process of thinking) was moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 86 required set up and clean-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene.During a review of Resident 86's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/11/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 86 had the capacity to understand and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures for three of five sampled residents (Residents 74, 49, and 75) when:1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not sanitize a bedside table, brought from another resident room, prior to placing and serving Resident 74's breakfast tray. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8 did not wash their hands before administering Artificial Tears eye drops (a medication used to treat dryness and itchiness in eyes) to Resident 49 during medication pass observation.3. Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- an infection control measure to protect residents at high risk for multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO- bacteria resistant to multiple classes of antibacterial medication]) signage was not displayed at Resident 75's room.These deficient practices had the potential for the avoidable spread of bacteria and disease to Residents 74, 49, and 75, and other residents. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 74's admission Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure the primary care provider (PCP) was notified for one of seven residents ' (Resident 1), when: 1. Resident 1 had missed doses of Macrobid oral capsule (a type of antibiotic) to treat Urinary Tract Infection ([UTI], an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) on 3/11/2025, 3/13/2025, and 3/15/2025. 2. Resident 1 refused the suprapubic catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted directly into the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen above the pubic bone) changed as ordered by the PCP. These failures had the potential to cause unresolved UTI and can lead complications such as sepsis (a life-threatening infection), hospitalization, and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonitis (inflammation of lung tissue, usually caused by a virus) and acute (sudden) pulmonary edema…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, three of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 6, and 7), received oxygen as per physician's orders and oxygen saturations ([O2 sat], a measurement of how much oxygen the blood is carrying as a percentage, normal range is 95-100%) were checked accurately. These failures had the potential to not identify Residents 1, 6, and 7's oxygenation status and placed the residents at risk for complications related to poor oxygenation (the process of supplying blood or tissues with oxygen) such as respiratory distress (a condition where breathing is labored and inadequate), hospitalization and death. Findings: 1). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonitis (inflammation of lung tissue, usually caused by a virus) and acute (sudden) pulmonary edema (excess accumulation of fluid in the lungs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove the identifiable health information (any information that could be used to identify the individual, such as the full name, date of birth , etc.) on the gastrostomy tube (GT, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach, for people with swallowing problems) feeding bottle before disposing in the trash can for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 23). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unauthorized disclosure of Resident 23's personal information to unauthorized users. Findings: During an observation on 1/6/2025 at 10:36 a.m., in Resident 23's room, Resident 23's GT feeding bottle with the resident's name was observed in the trash can. During an observation on 1/7/2025 at 8:50 a.m., in Resident 23's room, Resident 23's GT feeding bottle with the resident's name was observed in the trash can. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care for a resident that exhibited a behavior of teeth grinding for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 4). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the care or treatment of Resident 4's teeth grinding behavior. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) communication deficit, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and adult failure to thrive (a progressive decline in an individual's ability to care for themselves due to multiple contributing factors). During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services that were in accordance with the facility's policy for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 239), when the facility did not display No Smoking/ Oxygen in Use signs on the outside of the door of the resident room or in the room where an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides oxygen-enriched air to help people breathe) was at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fire hazards to all residents, families, visitors, staff, and residents' properties, and result in serious harm and injury. Findings: During an observation on 1/6/2025 at 9:48 a.m., outside of Resident 239's room, there was no No Smoking/ Oxygen in Use sign on the entrance room door. Resident 239 was observed lying on the bed with an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides oxygen-enriched air to help people breathe) at the bedside. There was no No Smoking/ Oxygen in Use sign observed in the room. During an observation on 1/7/2025 at 8:32 a.m., outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater, as evidenced by the identification of 6 medication errors out of 28 opportunities for error, to yield a cumulative error rate of 21.43% for one of two of sampled residents (Residents 43). Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered six oral medications to Resident 43 at one time. Resident 43 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 43 not being able to swallow her medications and had the potential to cause aspiration (when a fluid or solid accidentally enters the windpipe and lungs) or a choking hazard for Resident 43. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, dated 1/8/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 43 had the following diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled resident (Resident 43) was assessed for swallowing ability prior to administering oral medications. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 43 not being able to swallow her medications and had the potential to cause aspiration (when a fluid or solid accidentally enters the windpipe and lungs) or a choking hazard. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, dated 1/8/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 43 had the following diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and encephalopathy (decreased brain function). During a review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/4/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 43's cognition (the ability to think, remember and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the food preferences and offer an alternative menu for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 75). This deficient practice had the potential to impact Resident 75's nutritional status and quality of life and result in food dissatisfaction leading to insufficient food intake. Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, dated 1/8/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 75 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 75 had the following diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (an abnormally high amount of fat in the blood). During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure proper infection control practices were implemented for two of six sampled residents (Resident 189 and Resident 23) when the facility failed to perform the following: 1. Ensure Resident 189, who had a fever and a productive cough, was placed on isolation precautions (methods used to prevent the spread of germs and infections in healthcare and residential settings), as indicated in the facility's policy. 2. Ensure Resident 23's nasal cannula (NC, a plastic medical device to provide additional oxygen to a person directly into the nostrils) was not touching the floor on 1/6/2025 and 1/7/2025. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection to other residents and staff within the facility and had the potential to place Resident 23 at risk for an upper airway respiratory infection (infection affecting the sinuses and throat). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 189's admission Record, the admission Record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the kitchen staff failed to wash their hands prior to becoming in contact with food, failed to check food temperatures, and failed to store food under sanitary conditions when the following occurred: 1. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) did not wash their hands before checking food temperatures. 2. The refrigerator stored food without a use by date. 3. The refrigerator stored food that was spoiled. 4. The freezer stored food without the date that it was placed in the freezer and did not have a use by date. 5. Food temperatures were not checked prior to serving food to residents. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the transmission of infectious agents that could lead to food borne illnesses in vulnerable residents. Findings: During a concurrent initial kitchen tour observation and interview on 1/8/2024 at 8:55 a.m. with [NAME] 1, in the dry storage room, [NAME] 1 stated items placed in the storage room were dated with the received date (date item was placed on the shelf), the date the item was opened, and a use by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 74 and 297) when the following occurred: 1. Licensed staff failed to complete a 72-hour neurological check (a physical examination to identify signs of disorders affecting your brain, spinal cord and nerves) as ordered by the physician and as indicated within the facility's policy after Resident 297, who was admitted to the facility with a history of a fall which resulted in a subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull), had another fall (in the facility) with head trauma (physical injury). 2. Licensed staff documented thirty-seven (37) administrations of Lidocaine 5% patch (medicated patch applied to the skin for pain management) for Resident 74, when only fourteen (14) patches had been dispensed to the facility. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a missed assessment that could have led to an undetected,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments and services to two of seven sampled residents (Residents 27 and 82) to prevent and/or limit a decline in joint (where two bones meet) range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) when the facility failed to: 1. Provide ROM services for Resident 27 to improve or prevent a decline in both of Resident 27's arms. 2. Provide Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents maintain their function and mobility) ambulation (walking) exercise five times a week as ordered for Resident 82. These deficient practices had the potential to cause residents to have a decline in mobility (ability to move), lead to contractures (loss of motion of a joint), and have a decline in physical functioning such as the ability to eat, dress, and walk. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 27…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for medication administration for six out of 10 sampled residents (Resident 28, 35, 51, 68, 81, 82) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 did not administer the routine 9:00 a.m. dose of medication to Resident 28, 35, 68, 81, and 82 on [DATE]. 2. Resident 28, 35, and 81 was administered Tenormin, Diltiazem, Amlodipine, Labetalol, and Hydralazine (medications used to treat high blood pressure) despite meeting the hold parameters (when a medication is not administered based on a specific condition) for having a heart rate lower than 60. 3. Resident 51 was administered Midodrine (medication used to treat low blood pressure) despite meeting the hold parameters for having a systolic blood pressure (SBP, the maximum blood pressure during contraction of the ventricles [the two lower chambers of the heart responsible for pumping blood out of the heart]) more than 110. These deficient practices caused Resident's 28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 failed to competently administer medications to three (3) of five (5) randomly selected residents (Residents 81, 74, and 7) during the medication administration observation. The outcome was 16 medication errors out of thirty opportunities for errors, which resulted in a Medication Administration Error Rate of fifty-three (53) percent, based on the following: 1. Resident 81 did not receive four (4) ordered medications that were documented as administered, and Resident 81 received one (1) medication more than one hour after the permitted administration time. 2. Resident 74 did not receive seven (7) ordered medications that were documented as administered, and Resident 74 received one (1) medication outside of the ordered holding parameters (specific instructions for when and when not to administer a medication based on measurable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and calibrate (process that ensures the reading and functionality of a device is accurate and in full working order) the ultrasound/electrotherapy modality machine (medical device that includes both ultrasound, a method to produce high-frequency sound waves that can travel deep into tissue and create therapeutic heat and electrotherapy, a method that sends electrical pulses through the skin) for resident use in the rehabilitation department. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury to any resident who used this equipment as part of their therapy treatment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/2024 at 1:41 p.m., in the rehab gym, the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) stated the rehab department had one electrical modality machine that provided both ultrasound and electrotherapy treatment. A sticker on the ultrasound/electrotherapy machine indicated the device was last inspected in 6/2022 and was due for reinspection in 6/2023. The DOR stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were sitting at eye-level while providing feeding assistance to one of five sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure had the potential to result in affecting Resident 10's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), and metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain caused by chemical imbalances in the blood). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 10/19/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 10 was able to sometimes understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information and education regarding an Advance Directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) to one of six sampled residents' (Resident 7) Responsible Party (RP). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 7's preferences for care in an emergency, or in the event she became incapacitated (unable to participate in a meaningful way in medical decisions) or unable to make medical decisions, would not be identified and/or carried out by the facility staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, notice indicating when Medicare [federal health insurance for people 65 or older, and some people under 65 with certain disabilities or conditions] covered services are ending) to the resident's Responsible Party (RP) two days before their Medicare covered services ended for one of three sampled residents (Resident 27). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 27's RP not having ample time to exercise their right to file an appeal. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to improve, prevent and/or limit a decline in joint (where two bones meet) range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 27) who was identified as having a decline in ROM to both arms. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 27 and lead to contracture (loss of motion of a joint associated with stiffness and joint deformity) development and a decline in overall physical functioning such as the ability to move, eat and dress. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 27 on 7/17/2023 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (loss of protective cartilage that cushions the ends of your bones), muscle weakness, and neuropathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the resident-centered care plan (document that helps nurses and other team care members organize aspect of resident care) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 74) who had a change in her ability to carry out her activities of daily living (ADLs, term used to collectively describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, bathing, and mobility). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 74's needs not be met due to the staff being unaware of the required assistance needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not provide adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) 3 received report (oral communication between care providers to describe that status of the resident) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 74) who was readmitted to the facility from the general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure resulted in the nursing staff and physician being unaware of Resident 74's computed tomography (CT, imaging that helps detect internal injuries and diseases) scan results that showed a compression fracture (type of broken bone that can cause the vertebra [bone in the spine] to collapse) of the second lumbar vertebrae (L2, bone in the lower end of the spinal column). Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary care and services to two sampled residents (Resident 85 and 35) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 failed to report Resident 85's change in condition to a licensed nurse. 2. CNA 2 failed to properly reposition Resident 85 in bed. 3. Staff did not reposition Resident 35 and Resident 85 every 2 hours. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 85's health changes to become compromised and go unnoticed, and had the potential to result in skin breakdown or compromised skin integrity for Resident 35 and Resident 83. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 85's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 85 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysarthria (weakness in muscles used for speech, which often causes slowed or slurred speech) and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure precautions were maintained to prevent the development of pressure ulcers (PU, an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue, caused when an area of skin is placed under prolonged pressure) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 73) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 73's weight was accurately set on the low air loss mattress (LALM, a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a broad surface area to help prevent skin breakdown). These failures had the potential to result in the development of skin breakdown and/or pressure ulcers which could result in complications associated with impaired skin integrity for Residents 73. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's admission record, the record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 73 on 7/29/2022 and re-admitted Resident 73 on 10/14/2023. Resident 73's admitting diagnoses included abnormal posture, generalized muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 73's progress note by Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were maintained for two of five sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 73) when the following occurred: 1. Resident 22 did not have fall mats placed at her bedside, and call light was not within her reach. 2. Resident 73 did not have a fall mat placed at her bedside. These failures had the potential to cause avoidable harm to Resident 22 and Resident 73 related to repeat falls and the potential injuries related to sustaining a fall. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 22 on 12/5/2015 and re-admitted Resident 22 on 8/13/2021. Resident 22's admitting diagnoses included osteoarthritis (wearing down of the protective tissue at the ends of bones that occurs gradually and worsens over time), unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), aphakia in both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure the resident's nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow through the nose) and the oxygen concentrator humidifier bottle (medical devise that increases the humidity in the nostrils while using supplemental oxygen) were labeled with the date, time, and initials of the nurse when initially used for Resident 10 and Resident 51. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a negative respiratory outcome and increased the risk for Resident 10 and Resident 51 to acquire a respiratory infection. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body using a machine when the kidneys are not able to do so) treatment was assessed before and after dialysis treatment and the assessment was documented in the Dialysis Communication Records for one of one sampled resident (Resident 81). This deficient practice had the potential for unidentified complications after dialysis treatment such as swelling, pain, bleeding, and bruising. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 81 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis and end stage of renal disease (ESRD, a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a competency assessment for Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 upon hire as per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), which resulted in LVN 4 failing to competently administer medications and supplements as ordered by the physician for three out of five sampled residents (Resident 81, 74, and 7), including one significant medication administration error, during the medication administration observations. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 81, 74, and 7, and other residents at risk for harm related to improper administration of medication, and delays in provision of care related to missed administrations of ordered medications and supplements. Cross Reference: F-tag 726, F-tag 760, and F-tag 684 Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 81 on 7/29/2022 and re-admitted Resident 81 on 12/15/2023. Resident 81's admitting diagnoses included end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 74) was free of significant medication errors by failing to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 did not administer 10 units (a unit of measurement for insulin) of Lantus (insulin glargine, a medication used to control blood sugar levels) when resident 74's blood sugar was outside of the holding parameters (specific instructions for when and when not to administer a medication based on measurable values). 2. Ensure Licensed staff did not document administration of thirty-seven (37) of Lidocaine 5% patches (medicated patch applied to the skin for pain management) for Resident 74, when only fourteen (14) patches had been dispensed to the facility. These deficient practices had the potential to result in avoidable harm from pain related to non-administered pain medication, and low blood sugar related to insulin being administered outside of the ordered parameters. Cross Reference: F-tag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain the results for one of two sampled residents (Resident 74) computed tomography (CT, imaging that helps detect internal injuries and diseases) scan in a timely manner when Resident 74 was readmitted to the facility from the general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure resulted in Resident 74's physician being notified two weeks after the CT scan was completed with results that indicated a compression fracture (type of broken bone that can cause the vertebra [bone in the spine] to collapse) of the second lumbar vertebrae (L2, bone in the lower end of the spinal column). Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 41, 74, and 82) understood the Arbitration Agreement (an agreement between the facility and the resident where they would resolve any disputes through a neutral person rather than going to court) when entering a binding contract by failing to: 1. Present the Arbitration Agreement in a language Resident 82 understood. 2. Ensure Resident 82, Resident 41's Family Member (FM) 1, and Resident 74's Family Member (FM) 2 understood that signing the Arbitration Agreement was not necessary as a condition of admission to the facility. These failures resulted in Resident 82 not understanding in the language he understood and Residents 41, 74, and 82 entering the binding agreement as a pretense that it was mandatory. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 82 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective infection prevention measures for three of seven sampled residents (Resident 2, 10, and 46) when the facility failed to: 1. Post signage in and around Resident 2's room to ensure staff providing direct resident care activities were aware of Resident 2's Enhanced Standard Precautions (ESP, infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms). 2. Ensure the Treatment Nurse (TN) performed hand hygiene (a way of cleaning one's hands that substantially reduces the potential germs on the hands) throughout Resident 46's wound treatment. 3. Ensure Resident 10's enteral hydration (water provided through a feeding tube [a flexible plastic tube placed into the stomach to assist in nutrition and hydration) administration kit (tubing system that delivers the water into the body) was changed within 24 hours. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a call light that was maintained in proper working condition and without a frayed cord with inner wires exposed for one out of 24 sampled residents (Resident 69). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 69 using an unsafe call light and the potential to not have needs met. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 69 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD, gradual loss of kidney function) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, enlarged prostate gland). During a review of Resident 69's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/28/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 69 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 10/3/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 69's cognitive skills (mental action or process of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,588 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $26,588 — penalty dated 2024-01-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.2+2.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.3+1.7 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alameda Care CenterBurbank, CA 1 of 5Burbank Healthcare & RehabBurbank, CA 1 of 5California Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVan Nuys, CA 1 of 5Cerritos Vista Healthcare CenterBellflower, CA 1 of 5Colonial Care CenterLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Imperial Care CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5Live Oak Rehab CenterSan Gabriel, CA 1 of 5Magnolia Gardens Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Northridge Care CenterReseda, CA 1 of 5Sherman Oaks Health & RehabSherman Oaks, CA 1 of 5Sherman Village HccNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Studio City Rehabilitation CenterStudio City, CA 1 of 5West Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterCanoga Park, CA 1 of 5Western Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Broadway Manor Care CenterGlendale, CA 2 of 5Chino Valley Health Care CentePomona, CA 2 of 5Covina Rehabilitation CenterCovina, CA 2 of 5Crenshaw Nursing HomeLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Eastland Subacute And Rehabilitation CenterEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Highland Springs Care CenterBeaumont, CA 2 of 5Intercommunity Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Longwood Manor Conv.hospitalLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Park Anaheim Healthcare CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Santa Fe LodgeEl Monte, CA 2 of 5Whittier Pacific Care CenterWhittier, CA 3 of 5Green Acres Healthcare CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Imperial Crest Health Care CenterHawthorne, CA 3 of 5Laurel Convalescent HospitalFontana, CA 3 of 5Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Montrose Healthcare CenterMontrose, CA 3 of 5San Gabriel Conv CenterRosemead, CA 3 of 5Sunnyview Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5View Park Convalescent CenterLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Burlington Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA 4 of 5Casa Bonita Convalescent HospitalSan Dimas, CA 4 of 5Meadows Ridge Care CenterColton, CA 5 of 5Alden Terrace Convalescent HospitalLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIEDMAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 06/30/2023
IRA D FRIEDMAN 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN FAMILY 1991 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 06/30/2023
THE KLAVAN FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 06/30/2023
THE TZIPPY FRIEDMAN NOTIS 1990 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 06/30/2023
AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2023
FRIEDMAN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF21%since 06/30/2023
KLAVAN, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
LEHMANN, LIBBYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
NOTIS, SHMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF18%since 06/30/2023
PERVAIZ, ZAIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
FRIEDMAN, IRAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
BUHAY, ROWENAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2008
CHAUDHRY, MOHAMMADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/20/2007
KLAVAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/1986
NIEVA, VERNA LYNNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/02/2023
BENEFICIAL HEALTH CARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
PICO RIVERA INVESTMENTS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

20 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 13%Other / private 15%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$387per resident / day
operating cost
$11,754per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$351per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055170. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next