Crenshaw Nursing Home
1900 S Longwood Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90016 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 55 certified beds · (323) 933-1560 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $47,972 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-21)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.4% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 13.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.27 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.5–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 5.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 80.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.0–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 49.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-11 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who had severe cognitive impairment, was safely discharged when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an Interdisciplinary Meeting ([IDT] gathering where healthcare professionals from different disciplines collaborate to discuss a patient's care, develop shared understandings, and coordinate treatment plans) for discharge planning was conducted for Resident 1. 2. Ensure Resident 1 ' s discharge location (house) could meet the resident ' s needs. 3. Follow up with Resident 1 after his discharge from the facility to the house, to ensure Resident 1 was safe and comfortably settled. 4. Ensure Resident 1 had a designated individual to safely administered his medications including Risperdal (medication to treat mental health conditions) and gabapentin (medication to treat nerve pain). 5. To contact the Local Contact Agency (a state-designated entity that provides options counseling to individuals in long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), from physical abuse (willful infliction of injury with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) by Resident 2, by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 (victim) was not subjected to a repetitive physical abuse from Resident 2 (aggressor). 2. Ensure Resident 1 and Resident 2 were separated and were not left to continue residing in the same room, after Resident 1 reported to a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) that Resident 2 hit him on 4/1/ 2024. 3. Ensure Resident 1 and Resident 2 were separated, after Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the right eye on 4/23/2024, causing Resident 1 to sustain a red bruise (an injury appearing as an area of discolored skin on the body, caused by a blow or impact) and swelling around the right eyelid. 4. Develop a care plan for Resident 1 and 2, with interventions to prevent further abuse on 4/1/2024 and 4/23/2024, after Resident 1 alleged to have been hit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Change In a Resident's Condition, which indicated the facility will notify the Resident's representative (RP) of changes in the resident's medical condition and/or status for one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1), when Resident 1's Public Guardian (PG) was not notified of the Resident's transfer to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 4/4/2026.This failure had the potential to violate Resident 1's RP to be informed regarding the patient's condition and result in the inability for the RP to make informed decisions regarding the Resident's care.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition (a mental health diagnosis for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:Ensure the Annex medication storage refrigerator temperature was below 40 degrees Fahrenheit.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the loss of potency and expired medication.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview, on [DATE] at 8:45 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), the Annex station medication storage refrigerator which contained 7 insulin pens and vials was observed with an internal temperature of 49 degrees Fahrenheit. LVN 3 stated the refrigerator was reading at 49 degrees and was warm. LVN 3 stated the appropriate refrigerator temperature for refrigerated medications should have been below 40 degrees. LVN 3 stated that the risk when the refrigerator is not within the acceptable temperature range is that the medications could lose its potency.During a review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), titled Storage of Medications, dated 3/2023, the P&P indicated Drugs and biologicals used in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) was obtained and an interdisciplinary team ([IDT] - team members from different disciplines who come together to discuss resident care) meeting was conducted before the initiation of a psychotropic drug (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 26) who had diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).This deficient practice placed Resident 26 at risk for sustaining adverse effects (undesired effect of a drug) from psychotropic medication.Findings:During a review of Resident 26's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) for two of 14 sampled residents (Residents 2 and 32) reflected an accurate assessment, by failing to:A. Ensure Resident 2's Gabapentin (a medication used primarily used as anticonvulsant and for treatment of certain types of nerve pain) medication was encoded as anti-convulsant medication in the MDS assessment Section N0415 (High-Risk Drug Classes) K1(Anticonvulsant).B. Ensure Resident 32's dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment was encoded in the MDS assessment Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) 0110 (J1 - Dialysis). This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 screening (a federally required preliminary screening for individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility) was completed and resubmitted for one of two sampled residents (Resident 7), who had diagnoses of mental illness (abnormal behavior or disturbing feelings, thoughts, or actions that interfere with every day functioning) and was receiving psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior).This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 5 not appropriately evaluated and not provided the necessary specialized services for mental illness.Findings: During a review of Resident 7's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to:1). Conduct a Level 2 Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay of necessary care and mental health services.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 5 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1). Ensure care plan for oxygen use was initiated for two of 8 sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 6).This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in delivery of care and services.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 22's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 22 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), acute respiratory failure (a critical condition where the lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen to the blood), pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), and bronchitis (inflammation or swelling of the airway tubes that carry air to the lungs, commonly causing a hacking cough with mucus, chest tightness, and wheezing). During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident's (Resident 11) blood pressure was checked prior to the administration of hydrochlorothiazide (drug used to treat high blood pressure). This deficient practice had the potential to result in severe hypotension (low blood pressure) for Resident 11.Findings: During a review of Resident 11's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 11's diagnoses included hypertension ([HTN] - high blood pressure), cerebral infarction (a condition that occurs when the blood flow to the brain is disrupted due to issues with the arteries that supply it) with hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and Diabetes Mellitus ([DM] - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recommendation from the Consultant Pharmacist (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 26), was acted upon. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 26 experiencing a delay in treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 26's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), mood disorder (a mental health condition that primarily affects a person's persistent emotional state, causing intense, long-lasting highs or lows that interferes with daily life), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent felling of sadness and loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher chlorine test paper strips (used to test commercial dishwasher for proper sanitation level) were not expired.This deficient practice could result in inaccurate readings that would lead to under-sanitized dishes.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/2026 at 12:25 p.m., in the kitchen dishwashing machine area, the Dietary Aide 2 (DA 2) tested the dishwashing machine sanitation running water after it was sanitized with chlorine test paper strip. The DA 2 stated the chlorine test paper strip bottle indicated an expiration date of 3/2026. The DA 2 stated he did not check the expiration of the chlorine test paper strip prior to testing. During an interview on 4/22/2026 at 12:30 p.m., with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated using an expired chlorine test paper strip would give a false or inaccurate reading that would lead to improperly sanitized water. During a review of the 2022 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code titled Equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity when requesting to be cleaned by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1.This deficient practice of not cleaning Resident upon request left Resident 1 to feel frustrated and upset. Findings:a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses hemiplegia (a condition characterized by loss of muscle strength), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), osteoarthritis (a condition that causes pain, stiffness, and impaired mobility. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/26/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the ability to make decisions for activities of daily living. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 5/9/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) that an abuse allegation was reported within two hours to the California Department of public Health (CDPH) and other agencies. This deficient practice of not reporting an abuse allegation within two hours caused a delay in investigating by the CDPH.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses hemiplegia (a condition characterized by loss of muscle strength), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), osteoarthritis (a condition that causes pain, stiffness, and impaired mobility. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/26/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the ability to make decisions for activities of daily living. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) prior to administering a psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) for two of four sampled residents (Residents 16 and 41). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychotropic medication. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 16's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent, and irrational worry or fear that interferes with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a chronic lung disease causing difficulty of breathing) and dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent survey of the facility was posted in a place readily accessible to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to violate the rights of residents to examine the survey results of the facility and could lead to residents not being fully informed of the facility's deficient practices and how they were corrected. Findings: During an observation, on 3/20/2025 at 9:00 a.m., at the Annex Station, a signage was observed posted on the wall, inside of the nursing station indicating, CDPH survey information available upon request. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/2025 at 9:47 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated all recertification survey results should have been in a folder at the nursing station, freely accessible to all residents. The DON stated the survey binder was not placed near the signage or around the nurse's station. The DON stated the risk of not providing free access to the facility's survey binder could result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the low air loss mattress ([LALM] a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) was set and maintained at the correct setting according to the manufacturer's setting for two of three sampled residents (Residents 16 and 41). 2. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 105) had a LALM to prevent pressure ulcer. These deficient practices placed Residents 16 and 41 at risk for discomfort and skin breakdown. and had the potential to result in the worsening of Resident 105 pressure ulcer. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 16's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent, and irrational worry or fear that interferes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication room storage refrigerator was maintained below 46 degrees as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Storage in the Facility. This deficient practice had the potential for medications be stored in improper temperature, or humidity and can alter the effectiveness of the medication. Findings: During an observation, on 3/19/2025, at 12:20 p.m., at the medication room storage refrigerator, the refrigerator had unopened insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of blood sugar in the blood) vials, insulin pens, and unopened multidose tuberculin (a substance used in a skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis [TB] infection) injection vials. The medication storage refrigerator temperature was observed at 48 degrees Fahrenheit. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/19/2025, at 12:22 p.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated per policy, the temperature for the refrigerator should be maintained between 36-46 degrees. LVN 1 stated the refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a privacy bag (a cover placed over the urine collection bag, so it was not visible) for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 101) who had a urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 101 to feel uncomfortable while around other residents and negatively affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 101 's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent and excessive fear that interferes with daily life and functioning), calculus of kidney (hard deposits of minerals and salts that form inside the kidneys), and the cerebral infraction (the death of brain tissue due to a lack of blood flow). During a review of Resident 101's History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled resident's (Resident 44) call light was within reach. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 44 not to be able to call for assistance to obtain necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 44 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 44's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder that sends the wrong signals in the brain and cause seizures), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 1/3/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 44 was usually able to understand. The MDS indicated Resident 44' had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 202) who was on dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 202 to not receive appropriate care and treatments specific to the resident's dialysis need. Findings: During a review of Resident 202's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure), hypertension ([HTN] high blood pressure) and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 202's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/9/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 202 had the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 202's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 105) who was receiving oxygen (O2). This deficient practice had the potential for unidentified goals and interventions for Resident 105. Findings: During a review of Resident 105's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 105 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 105's diagnoses included end stage renal disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure, diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 105's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 3/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 105's cognition (ability to learn, reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) was moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 105 was dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and record the blood pressure (BP) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 202) who had a physician's order for Midodrine (a medication to treat low blood pressure) every 8 hours as needed for systolic blood pressure ([SBP] the first number in a blood pressure reading) of less than 120. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving the medication as needed and hypotension (low blood pressure) which could lead to dizziness, falls and stroke (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain). Findings: During a review of Resident 202's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure), hypertension ([HTN] high blood pressure), and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 202's History and Physical (H&P) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care (interventions and therapies aimed at improving or restoring lung function and addressing breathing difficulties) were provided to two of three sampled residents (Residents 12 and 16), in accordance with standards of practice, by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 12's tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck for an airway) site and tube were free of dried secretions (substance such as saliva or mucus). 2. Resident 16's face mask nebulizer (a medical device that uses a small machine to turn liquid medication into a mist that can be inhaled through a face mask, allowing medication to be delivered directly to the lungs) tubing was labeled with date when changed. These failures had the potential to cause respiratory infection for Resident 12 and 16. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received hemodialysis ([HD] - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment received care in accordance with standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 202) by failing to: 1. Monitor and record resident's blood pressure every 8 hours who was receiving Midodrine (a medication to treat low blood pressure) as needed following parameters set by physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unintended consequences of Resident 202's management of low blood pressure. Findings: During a review of Resident 202's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 202's diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease ([ESRD]- irreversible kidney failure), hypertension ([HTN] - high blood pressure), and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on the pharmacist consultant's (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) recommendations timely, for two of four sampled residents (Residents 16 and 41). Cross Reference to F758. This deficient practice placed Residents 16 and 41 at risk for unnecessary medication administration. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 16's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent, and irrational worry or fear that interferes with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty of breathing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 16 and 41), who received as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior), were reevaluated after 14 days. Cross Refer to F756. This deficient practice placed Residents 16 and 41 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects (a harmful and undesired effect resulting from a medication or intervention) related to psychotropic medication use. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 16's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent, and irrational worry or fear that interferes with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty of breathing) and dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Kitchen refrigerator 1 had an external thermometer (an appliance to monitor the temperature of a refrigerator) in working condition. 2. The large clear egg noodle pasta bin in the dry storage area was labeled with name and date. 3. Kitchen refrigerator 2 had proper internal temperature (40 degrees Fahrenheit or lower) maintained for the refrigerated food items. This deficient practice had the potential to cause rapid growth of bacteria that can cause foodborne illness (food poisoning). Findings: 1). During the initial kitchen tour observation, on 3/18/2025, at 8:27 a.m., the external thermometer of refrigerator 1 was observed counting upwards in seconds and minutes starting from zero and the internal thermometer of refrigerator 2 was observed at 42 degrees Fahrenheit. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/18/2025, at 8:30 a.m., with the Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1), DA 1 stated he did not know why the external thermometer of refrigerator 1 was counting upwards or if it had malfunctioned. DA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the humidifier (a product that adds moisture to the air to help with breathing) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 105), was changed and labeled with date. This deficient practice placed Resident 105 at risk for respiratory infection (an infection affecting the nose, throat, sinuses, airways, and lungs). Findings: During a review of Resident 105's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 105 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 105's diagnoses included end stage renal disease ([ESRD] - irreversible kidney failure, diabetes mellitus ([DM]-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 105's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 3/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 105's cognition (ability to learn,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH- the state department responsible for public health in California) of a resident-to-resident physical altercation for two of four sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). This resulted in a delay in investigation by CDPH and placed Resident 3 at risk for further abuse. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2 ' s face sheet, indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), epilepsy (a brain condition that causes seizures), and insomnia (trouble falling asleep or staying asleep). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/3/2025, the MDS Section indicated Resident 2 ' s cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), within 24 hours, for one of three sampled residents, Resident 3, who sustained a total of three bruises (result of a direct blow or an impact, such as a fall or after trauma, such as a blow to the body) of unknown source from 6/2024 to 12/2024. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of investigation by the CDPH. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 3 had impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate swelling and bruises (an injury appearing as an area of discolored skin on the body, caused by a blow or impact rupturing underlying blood vessels) of unknown source, on 6/18/2024, 11/5/2024 and 12/24/2024, for one of three sampled residents, Resident 3. This failure resulted in Resident 3 ' s continued sustaining injuries requiring interventions. This failure placed the resident at risk for severe injuries, resulting in hospitalization and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized plan of care for the safety of a resident that required to be within sight at all times of day and night for one of three sampled resident (Residents 3). This deficient practice had the potential for recurrent injuries or falls for Resident 3. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 3 ' s care plan, titled At Risk for Falls/Injury, dated 2/14/2024, the goal of care plan was to keep Resident 3 free from falls and injury. Interventions indicated facility would visibly observe resident frequently. The care plan did not indicate what frequency Resident 1 should be monitored or observed. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1). Provide an environment free of accident hazards as possible and provided one of three residents ' (Resident 3), adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. 2). Conduct accurate fall risk assessment to one of 3 residents, Resident 3, who had history of fall. 3). Implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, which indicated safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis and the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) review safety and incident/accident data; and a facility-wide commitment to safety at all levels of the organization. These failures resulted in Resident 3 experienced multiple incidents of bruising (an injury appearing as an area of discolored skin on the body, caused by a blow or impact rupturing underlying blood vessels). Resident 3 sustained swollen tibia (shinbone), fibula (calf bone) on 6/18/2024. Resident 3 sustained swollen left wrist on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's dietary staff failed to serve the correct consistency per physician's order on June 1, 2024. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for potential aspiration (happens when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs.) Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 6/8/2024, indicated Resident 1 had an intact cognition (mental capacity). Resident 1 required moderate assistance with eating and dressing and maximal assistance with oral hygiene and showers. Resident 1 was dependent for toileting hygiene, and dressing. A review of Resident 1's care plan, titled Mechanically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) with a pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) was provided with low air loss mattress (small air holes in the mattress top surface continually blow out air causing the patient to float, which reduces skin interface pressure at the mattress surface and moisture is wicked away so the patient stays dry) to promote wound healing. This failure had the potential to cause residents to experience the development or deterioration of pressure ulcers. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (bacterial infection that causes diarrhea), unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed us obscured by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during the night shift for one of 4 sample residents (Resident 4). Resident 4 was observed, going to the bathroom unsupervised on 6/14/2024 and 6/20/2024, while Certified Nurses Assistance (CNA) 2, was asleep at the nurse's station. This failure had the potential to lead to accidents, falls and injuries for Resident 4. Findings: A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety (causes feelings of worry and nervousness,), Major Depressive Disorder (mental illness that could affect a person's mood and thoughts characterized by a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily life), and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities). A review of Resident 4's Fall Risk care plan dated 4/13/2022, indicated Resident 4 was at risk for falls/injury related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents by failing to maintain residents room walls, floors, shower rooms, and laundry area clean. These deficient practices had the potential to result in cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another), pest activity and negatively affect resident's wellbeing. Findings: During an observation on 6/21/2024, at 5:05 a.m., in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls next to bed A and bed B were observed with brown, dry, dirty stains. During an observation on 6/21/2024, at 5:10 a.m., in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor behind bed A's headboard was observed with dry, old mouse dropping. During an observation on 6/21/2024, at 5:20 a.m., in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall, close to the bathroom, was observed with brown spots. During an observation on 6/21/2024, at 5:30 a.m., outside the laundry area, dirty plastic bags was observed placed next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure one out of three Resident (Resident 1) had a documented assessment for an injured right index finger after a notification of change of condition. This deficient practice of not having documented assessment placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening of injury of the right index finger. Findings: During a review of Residents 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 diagnoses not limited to schizoaffective disorder (combination of psychosis and mood symptoms), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes dramatic shifts in a person's mood, energy, and ability to think clearly), and metabolic encephalopathy (a problem with the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood). During a review of Residents 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/9/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 is able to make decisions for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure titled, Abuse & Mistreatment of Residents, which indicated the following: 1. When incidents involving the health, welfare, or safety of residents are reported, the involved resident(s) shall be removed from the environment that threatened resident's health, welfare, or safety. 2. The Charge Nurse and/or nursing supervisor shall conduct an immediate resident assessment to identify any injuries or extent of injuries, if any, shall notify the attending physician of incident for necessary interventions and notify family members and or legal agents of incident. 3. The Charge Nurse and/or Nursing Supervisor shall initiate resident care plan to reflect current conditions and measures taken to prevent recurrence of event. All findings are to be documented and if the suspected perpetrator is another resident, the residents shall be separated to avoid any further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within two hours, the alleged abuse reported on 4/1/2024 and 4/23/2024 for two out of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This violation delayed the investigation by the CDPH. Findings: a.) A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, dated 4/23/2024, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure) type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 4/5/24, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact (involving the processes of thinking and reasoning) in making decisions of activities of daily living (ADLs) and able to understand. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required set up for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate a resident-to-resident altercation on 4/1/2024 between two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 hitting Resident 1 in the face on 4/23/2024, that resulted in a red bruise and swelling on right eyelid. This also placed Resident 1 at risk for repeated physical abuse by Resident 2, which had the potential for more serious injuries requiring hospitalization, possible coma, or death. Findings: a). A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, dated 4/23/2024, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and initial admission date was 4/10/2023 with diagnosis including essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure) type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 4/5/24, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and resident-centered abuse care plan, on two alleged physical abuse incidents on 4/1/2024 and 4/23/2024, for two out of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in a repeated physical abuse to Resident 1 by Resident 2 on 4/23/2024, that resulted in a red bruise and swelling on right eyelid. This also placed Resident 1 at risk for repeated physical abuse by Resident 2, which had the potential for more serious injuries requiring hospitalization, possible coma, or death. Findings: a). A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, dated 4/23/2024, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure) type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an oxygen sign was posted and extension cord was free from hazards for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 11 and 34). This deficient practice had the potential for an unsafe environment with a fire hazard risk and placing Resident 34 at risk for a fall and injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 34 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 34's diagnoses include hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - a digestive disease in which stomach acid or contents irritates the food pipe lining), and cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). During a review of Resident 34's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/18/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 34 is able to make decisions for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications were properly labeled with open dates in medication cart 1 for five out of 23 residents (Resident 45, Resident 46, Resident 11, Resident 47, and Resident 29). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unintentional medication administration of possibly expired medications. Findings: During a medication cart inspection and observation of Cart 1 on 3/23/24 at 11:39 AM and a concurrent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), Cart 1 was noted to have 7 opened medications: Humulin (a medication also known as regular insulin used to treat diabetes mellitus), Sucrafate (a medication used in the treatment of gastric ulcers), Pantoprazole (a medication used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease), Lactulose (a medication used to treat constipation and can also treat liver disease), Levetiracetam (a medication used to treat seizures) and Geri-Tussin (Cough medicine and Cold medication) stored in the cart with no indication of any open dates. LVN 2 stated all opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to: 1. Ensure refrigerator temperatures were at or below 40 F. 2. Ensure food items were labeled with open and used by dates in the reach-in refrigerators, reach-in freezers, seasoning rack and dry storage room of the kitchen. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a kitchen observation on 3/23/24 at 7:55 AM and a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1), Refrigerator 2, Refrigerator 3 and Refrigerator 4 was noted to have a internal temperature of 43-45 degrees Fahrenheit. DA 1 stated the protocol for refrigerators temperatures should be at 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below. DA 1 stated the risk of having refrigerator temperatures at or above 40 can cause food to soil and cause residents to become sick. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/24 at 8:00 AM with DA 1, Refrigerator 1, Refrigerator 3, Refrigerator 4, Freezer 1 was noted to have opened milk cartons, a clear plastic bin of tomatoes, glasses of juices and milk, opened boxes of meat, vegetables and bread in each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Have a written Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program in place for a census of 42. This deficient practice had the potential to affect how the facility ensures care and services are delivered meet accepted standards of quality, identify problems and opportunities for improvement, and ensure progress toward correction or improvement is achieved and sustained. Findings: During an observation on 3/24/24 at 09:09 AM, Administrator (Admin) and Director of Nursing 2 (DON 2) was asked to produce the facility's QAPI program binder. During an interview on 3/24/24 at 12:04 PM with Director of Nursing 2, DON 2 stated he was attempting to find the facility's QAPI book. DON 2 stated QAPI meetings should be done every 3 months. [NAME] 2 stated he would speak to the Administrator regarding the program binder. During an interview on 3/24/24 at 12:40 PM with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IP 1), IP 1 states the facility's QAPI meetings are every quarter due to being a small facility. IP Nurse stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Use a dignity bag (blue nonwoven material that conceals fluid in the drainage bag to improve resident dignity) for a foley catheter drainage bag (device that holds the urine that drains from the resident's body) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 40). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 40's self-esteem and self-worth and to cause psychosocial harm or decline to the resident and violates resident's right to be treated with dignity. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 40 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 40's diagnoses include intestinal obstruction (something is blocking your intestine. Food and stool may not be able to move freely), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), and urinary retention (a condition in which you are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the overhead room light was in working condition for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 21). This deficient practice had the potential for an unsafe environment with placing Resident 21 at risk for a fall and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 21's diagnoses include type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), and history of falling. During a review of Resident 21's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/5/2022, the H&P indicated Resident 21 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 21's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-24 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six Residents (Resident 35) had a change of condition (COC) assessment after an altercation. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 35 receiving inadequate and inappropriate care and services necessary to reach their highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well being. Findings: During a review of Residents 35's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility 1/2/2024. Resident 35 diagnoses not limited to schizoaffective disorder (a combination of mood disorder conditions such as depression and [schizophrenia] delusions, hallucinations, unusual physical behavior, disorganized thinking and speech), malignant neoplasm (cancer that can spread and invade nearby tissues), and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During a review of Residents 35's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/2/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-24 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1.Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 11) had a physician order for the use of oxygen. This deficient practice of not having a physician order for oxygen usage placed Resident 11 at risk for incorrect oxygen usage. Findings: During a review of Residents 11's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility 3/20/2024. Resident 11 diagnoses not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disorder known for disrupting the way your body uses sugar), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning in thinking, remembering, and reasoning), and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged). During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/8/2024, MDS indicated Resident 11 cognitive (the ability to understand or to be understood by others) was not able to recall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1.Label and date the humidifiers (a device that adds moisture to a space) and nasal cannula (a device that gives you additional oxygen) for one out of six Residents (Resident 11). This deficient practice placed Resident 11 at risk for respiratory infection. Findings: During a review of Residents 11's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility 3/20/2024. Resident 11 diagnoses not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disorder known for disrupting the way your body uses sugar), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning in thinking, remembering, and reasoning), and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged). During a review of Residents 11's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/2/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 35 had the capacity to make decisions for activities of daily living. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications administered were documented accurately in the medication administration record (MAR) and the controlled drug record sheets (drugs or other substance tightly controlled by the government that may be abused or cause addiction) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for medication errors and can result in overdosage of narcotic medication and/or hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included acute myeloblastic leukemia (type of cancer in which the bone marrow makes a large number of abnormal blood cells), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily), and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the required room size measurement of 80 square feet of room space per resident in rooms with multiple residents.This deficient practice could potentially result in the residents not being able to move around freely and could potentially affect residents' health and safety.Findings:During a review of the facility's Client Analysis form, on 4/22/2026 at 10:18 a.m., the facility's Client Analysis form indicated:House Station Roomsa. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three resident beds, which measured 216 square feet.b. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two resident beds, which measured 144 square feet.c. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four resident beds, which measured 252 square feet.d. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three resident beds, which measured 198 square feet.e. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three resident beds, which measured 208 square feet.f. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three resident beds, which measured 208 square feet.f. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four resident beds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the required 80 square feet for each resident in House Station Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10, and Annex Station room [ROOM NUMBER]. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe condition when providing nursing care and treatment to the residents living in the affected rooms. Findings: During a review of the facility's document titled, Request for Waiver Variation Letter, dated 3/18/2025, the waiver indicated the House Station rooms 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 and Annex Station rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, did not meet the requirement of 80 square feet (sq ft) per resident. During a review of the facility's Client Analysis form, on 3/21/2025, at 9:45 a.m., the facility's Client Analysis form indicated: House Station Rooms a. room [ROOM NUMBER] had three resident beds, which measured 216 square feet. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two resident beds, which measured 144 square feet. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four resident beds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$47,972 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-03-21
- $23,920 — penalty dated 2024-04-26
- $7,903 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-21 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEVORAH DANZIGER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| ELKA KAPLAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| ESTHER HOFF GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| MORDECHAI NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| RACHEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| SARAH DUNNER GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| YEHOSHUA NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| YISROEL NOTIS GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| FRIEDMAN LIVING TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/02/1984 |
| FRIEDMAN, IRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| BRINLEY, BRITTANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| KLAVAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/1986 |
| WUDNEH, ALEM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2024 |
| FRIEDMAN, AARON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| KLAVAN, RACHEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2025 |
| LEHMANN, LIBBY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2025 |
| NOTIS, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2025 |
| AARON FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| IRA DAVID FRIEDMAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LIBBY FRIEDMAN LEHMANN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| RUCHEL FRIEDMAN KLAVAN GROUP A BUSINESS ASSETS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2023 |
| PERVAIZ, ZAID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $619K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055525. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.