Autumn Lake Healthcare At Cromwell

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 175 beds and averages 169.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and management of pain for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for pain, when staff did not communicate the resident's report of severe pain to the licensed nurse and failed to ensure timely access to and administration of prescribed PRN pain medication.This resulted in Resident #1 experiencing unrelieved severe pain (rated 8/10 and described as unbearable) for approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes, accompanied by observable signs of distress, including facial grimacing, restlessness, and inability to reposition comfortably, as well as verbalized psychosocial distress.The failure occurred when (1) the nurse aide did not report the resident's complaints of pain to the nurse, (2) the assigned nurse was not available on the unit and medication cart keys were not transferred to another licensed nurse, and (3) no alternate system was in place to ensure timely pain intervention, resulting in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #30, Resident #34, and Resident #69) residing on the secure unit, the facility failed to ensure a systematic way of determining placement, continued placement, involvement by the physician, resident representative, interdisciplinary team, or the impact residing on a secure unit had on the residents. The findings include:1. Resident #30 's diagnoses included Alzheimer's dementia early onset, anxiety disorder, and epilepsy.A wander risk assessment dated [DATE] identified a high risk for wandering.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 was severely cognitively impaired with short- and long-term memory problems, fluctuations in attention and required total staff assistance with eating, hygiene, transfer, bed mobility, dressing and was non ambulatory.The Resident Care Plan dated 1/27/26 identified Resident #30 was an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #180) reviewed during the initial pool screening, the facility failed to provide a privacy bag for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include:Resident # 180's diagnoses included a neurological cause of urinary retention, chronic kidney disease, weakness, and a comprehension communication deficit. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #180 was cognitively intact and required set up or clean up assistance for eating and oral hygiene and partial to moderate assistance for toileting, walking and transferring.The baseline Resident Care Plan in effect 3/27/26 to 3/30/26 identified Resident #180 had an indwelling urinary catheter related to urinary retention. Interventions included positioning the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from the entrance door to the room.A physician's order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #82) for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to follow an intervention to prevent the deterioration of an exisiting pressure ulcer. The findings include:Resident #82's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, hypoxia, and diabetes mellitus 2.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #82 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, sitting to lying, lying to sitting and to stand. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #82 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries and did not exhibit rejection of care necessary to achieve goals for health and wellbeing.The Resident Care Plan dated 2/26/26 identified Resident #82 had a potential for impaired skin/pressure ulcer injury development related to oxygen tubing use. Interventions included administering treatments as ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy review for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #40) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to obtain a consent and provide a resident with podiatry services. The findings include:Resident #40's diagnoses included disc degeneration, chronic kidney disease and heart failure.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #40 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 13 indicating intact cognition and was independent for eating, dressing and toileting.The Resident Care Plan dated 1/29/26 identified Resident #40 had a self-care performance deficit related to a deconditioned status. Interventions included for staff to adjust to the amount of physical function as residents' functional status/participation changed with behavior and to check nail length with bathing.Review of the physician's orders signed 3/11/26 failed to identify an order for podiatry services (although orders for other ancillary services were in place).Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review for 1 of 3 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage, the facility failed to store Schedule II-V controlled medications in a permanently affixed compartment within the medication refrigerator. The findings include:Interview and observation of the second floor medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 on 3/31/26 at 6:41 AM identified the following:For the North Side unit, located in the refrigerator on the second shelf, it was identified that although the controlled substance storage box was noted to be locked, it was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. Inside the North Side controlled medication compartment was 1 unopened bottle Lorazepam two (2) milligram (mg) per milliliter (ml), 30 milliliter (ml) vial with an expiration date of 3/2027.For the South Side unit, located in the refrigerator on the second shelf, it was identified that although the controlled substance storage box was noted to be locked, it was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. Inside the South Side controlled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident identifiable information and resident medical records were stored in a secure location. The findings include:Observation on 3/30/26 at 1:42 PM in the unoccupied and unlocked medical record room located in the basement of the facility identified there were 217 banker boxes with medical records ranging from 2013 to 2026. The boxes contained resident medical records with personally identifiable information including name, date of birth , medical record number, social security numbers, and diagnoses.Observation and interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 3/30/26 at 2:35 PM identified 217 banker boxes in the unoccupied and unlocked medical record room located in the basement of the facility. The boxes contained resident medical records with personally identifiable information including name, date of birth , medical record number, social security numbers, and diagnoses from 2013 to 2026.The DNS indicated that she was not familiar with the facility policy on resident medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (resident #30) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hospice provider communication had occurred for seating and following a fall. The findings include:The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 was severely cognitively impaired with short- and long-term memory problems, fluctuations in inattention and required total staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing and was non ambulatory. Resident #30 had a history of falls prior to admission.The Resident Care plan dated 3/22/26 identified Resident #30 had a terminal prognosis related to hospice services beginning 3/22/26. Interventions included hospice Registered Nurse (RN), work cooperatively with the hospice team to ensure the resident's, physical and social needs were met, and work with nursing staff to provide maximum comfort for Resident #30.A nurse's note dated 3/22/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the tour of the Dietary Department, staff interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure open food items were dated to include dates opened/expired/use by and failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions. The findings include: Tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 7/19/24 at 10:56 AM identified the following: a. The threshold of the walk in refrigerator where the door meets the doorframe had a heavy accumulation of dust and debris. Interview with the Dietary Manager identified that floors were swept after every meal service. b. An opened package containing 5 hotdogs was wrapped in plastic wrap but failed to identify an open date or expiration date. c. A 48 ounce container of Ricotta Cheese with a received date of 6/6/24 (with approximately 1/8 of the contents removed) was observed with a black and orange-like appearing substance along the inner rim and encroaching into the Ricotta Cheese. d. A 25 gallon container/tub of Spanish Onions was observed to be visibly dirty with a brown-like substance on the inside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data (staffing information) for the third quarter (April, May, and June 2023) was submitted as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The findings Include: Interview and review of facility documentation with the Administrator on 7/25/24 at 10:30 AM identified that he was aware that PBJ data for the third quarter of 2023 had not been submitted. The Administrator further indicated that the facility's corporate office was responsible for submitting PBJ data to CMS, however had failed to submit the information as required. Additionally, the Administrator identified that because of the failed data submission, the facility contracted a private based company to submit PBJ data on its behalf effective 1/1/24.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documentation, for 4 of the rooms/resident areas on the Elm Unit, 7 of the rooms/resident areas on the Maple Unit, 9 of the rooms/resident areas on the Oak Unit, and 2 of the rooms/resident areas on the Hickory Unit, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rooms and furnishing were maintained in a clean, safe, homelike and sanitary manner and in good repair. The findings included: 1. On 07/19/24 and 07/24/24, observations throughout the day of the Bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on the Elm Unit identified the following: a. The surface of the wall underneath the sink had the drywall and tile removed. The plumbing and wall studs were exposed with tile debris falling from the wall. An interview and tour with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) on 07/24/24 from approximately 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM identified he was unsure of how long the drywall had been missing. At one point there was a leak that required the drywall and tile to be removed. 2. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,628 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,628 — penalty dated 2026-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT